TOPIC: MICROCHIPS - COUNTERFEITS DESTROYED THE RUSSIAN FOBOS GRUNT
MISSION
THE CONTAMINATED FAILED MISSION CAME BACK TO EARTH IN 2012
THEY PLAN TO DO IT AGAIN IN 2018
WE ARE ALL GOING TO BE MICROCHIPPED WHETHER WE WANT TO OR NOT
10-3-12 - DREAM - I was starting a new job at Allis-Chalmers, sitting
at a computer screen and copying screen after screen of what looked like a
cursive foreign language written in blue, line after line horizontally and then
vertically onto another screen, hoping I was getting everything on the screen,
but not only what I could see but what was embedded behind the lines. This
was extremely important work about microchips.
I was then called into a meeting where I was introduced to a group of
engineers and scientists at a table that sat 12 people, however, the seat
directly across from me was empty.
I was introduced to the group first, and then asked to re-introduce myself
and tell my history of the topic I had been working on for quite some time.
My voice sounded like an old person, very gravily, and I began by saying that
I had been working at Allis-Chalmers since about 1970 which sounds like a very
long time ago, but was not that long as time goes.
All the other people at the table had a lot of experience with microchips I
knew, and I had to impress them about not only what I had been doing, but what I
about to reveal to them - the importance of the work itself.
NOTE: I really did start work at Allis-Chalmers sometime during 1973
and worked there for 11 years, working my way up from a clerical job in the
publishing department of the executive building, to head secretary of the
engineering department in Pumps and Compressors, and then moved into the
purchasing department where I handled not only the secretarial work of the
purchasing agents, but was trained by my superiors to read bluerprints so I
could read the details over the telephone if necessary to the men who did the
traveling, and went to school every year to improve my skills in a supervisory
capacity. My main job was to track and ship the wooden forms from which
the metal impellers and other components were poured at various manufacturing
plants around the United States. After Allis-Chalmera had a massive layoff in
1984, I left there and ultimately ended up working for Simpson Electric Company
in Dundee, Illinois as an Executive Secretary for several years, before moving
back to Milwaukee, WI and starting a new career in Property Management. There I
was trained by my superiors to handle million dollar budgets. During all
that time, I was also trained in computer work, but that was in the days before
people used PC's like we do now. These were all computers that had huge
rooms set aside for them in the basement and we had small consoles on our desks
on the 4th floor. Those were exciting days for me.
I've written about microchips before, but we used to know is nothing compared
to what is coming in the future for every citizen of this world to come.
10-3-12 - MEDITATION - I was sitting in a comfy chair thinkikng about the
language from the dream, and thinking about what language it wasn't, i.e. it
wasn't English for example, and tried to think what language it could have been.
All of a sudden, I was seeing the blue cursive writing again, and saw a
two-tone brown bear standing upright. The brown bear reached up and took
it's head off like it was a costume and I saw a blonde woman inside the brown
bear costume, with long wavy shoulder length hair.
I was awake and able to think, and realized that a brown bear could represent
Russia, so the cursive writing was evidently Russian, which surprised me as I've
never seen cursive Russian writing before.
Fobos-Grunt
Fobos-Grunt
A model of Fobos-Grunt presented during
CeBIT
2011
It was launched
on 9 November 2011 at 02:16 local time (8 November 2011, 20:16
UTC) from the
Baikonur Cosmodrome, but subsequent rocket burns intended to
set the
craft on a course for Mars failed, leaving it stranded in
low Earth orbit.[3][4]
Efforts to reactivate the
craft were unsuccessful, and it fell back to Earth in an
uncontrolled
re-entry on 15 January 2012, reportedly over the
Pacific Ocean west of Chile.[5][6][7][8][9]
The
return vehicle was to have returned to Earth in August 2014,
carrying up to 200 g of soil from Phobos.
Funded by the
Russian space agency
Roscosmos and developed by
NPO Lavochkin and the
Russian Space Research Institute, Fobos-Grunt was the
first Russian-led interplanetary mission since the
failed Mars 96.
The
last successful Russian interplanetary missions
were Vega 2
in 1985–1986, and the
partially successful
Fobos 2 in 1988–1989.[10]
Fobos-Grunt was designed to become the
first spacecraft to return a macroscopic sample from an
extraterrestrial body since Luna 24
in 1976.[11]
(Hayabusa
returned microscopic grains of asteroid material in 2010, and
Stardust returned cometary dust in 2006[12]).
Budget
The
cost of
the project was 1.5 billion rubles ($64.4 million USD).[13]
Project funding for
the timeframe 2009–2012, including post-launch operations, was about 2.4
billion rubles.[14]
The total cost of
the mission was to have been 5 billion rubles ($163 million USD).
According to lead scientist
Alexander Zakharov,
the entire spacecraft and most of
the instruments were new, though
the designs draw upon
the nation's legacy of three successful
Luna missions, which in
the 1970s retrieved a few hundred grams of Moon rocks.[15]
Zakharov had described
the Phobos sample return project as "possibly
the most difficult interplanetary one to date."[16]
Image of Phobos.
The
Fobos-Grunt project began with
the feasibility study of a Phobos sample-return mission in
1999.
The
Fobos-Grunt project began in 1999, when
the
Russian Space Research Institute and
NPO Lavochkin,
the main developer of Soviet and Russian interplanetary probes, initiated
a 9 million
rouble feasibility study into a Phobos sample-return mission.
The initial spacecraft design was to be similar to
the probes of
the
Fobos program launched in
the late 1980s.[17]
Development of
the spacecraft started in 2001 and
the preliminary design was completed in 2004.[13]
For years,
the project stalled as a result of low levels of financing of
the Russian space program. This changed in
the summer of 2005, when
the new government plan for space activities in 2006–2015 was published.
Fobos-Grunt was now made one of
the program's flagship missions. With substantially improved funding,
the launch date was set for October 2009.
The 2004 design was revised a couple of times and international partners
were invited to join
the project.[17]
In June 2006, NPO Lavochkin announced that it had begun manufacturing and
testing
the development version of
the spacecraft's onboard equipment.[18]
On 26 March 2007, Russia and China signed a cooperative agreement on
the joint exploration of Mars, which included sending China's first
interplanetary probe, Yinghuo-1,
to Mars together
with
the
Fobos-Grunt spacecraft.[19]
Yinghuo-1 weighed 115 kg (250 pounds) and would have been released by
the main spacecraft into a Mars orbit.[20]
Partners
NPO Lavochkin was
the project's main contractor developing its components.
The Chief Designer of
Fobos-Grunt was
Maksim Martynov.[21]
Phobos soil sampling and downloading were developed by
the GEOHI RAN Institute of
the
Russian Academy of Sciences (Vernadski Institute of Geochemistry and
Analytical chemistry) and
the integrated scientific studies of Phobos and Mars by remote and
contact methods were
the responsibility of
the
Russian Space Research Institute,[22]
where
Alexander Zakharov served as lead scientist of
the mission[16]
The
Chinese Yinghuo-1
orbiter was launched together
with
Fobos-Grunt.[23]
In late 2012, after a 10–11.5 month cruise, Yinghuo-1 would have separated and
entered a 800×80,000 km equatorial orbit (5° inclination) with a period of three
days.
The spacecraft was expected to remain on Martian orbit for one year.
Yinghuo-1 would have focused mainly on
the study of
the external environment of Mars. Space center researchers expected to
use photographs and data to study
the magnetic field of Mars and
the interaction between ionospheres,
escape particles and
solar wind.[24]
A second Chinese payload,
the Soil Offloading and Preparation System (SOPSYS), was integrated in
the lander. SOPSYS was a microgravity grinding tool developed by
the
Hong Kong Polytechnic University.[25][26]
Another
payload on
Fobos-Grunt was an experiment
from the
Planetary Society called
Living Interplanetary Flight Experiment; its goal was to test whether
selected organisms
can survive a few years in
deep
space by flying
them through interplanetary space.
The experiment would have tested one aspect of
transpermia,
the hypothesis
that life could survive space travel, if protected inside rocks blasted by
impact off one planet to land on another.[27][28][29][30][31]
The
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences contributed with a radiation measurement
experiment on
Fobos-Grunt.[32]
Two MetNet
Mars landers developed by
the
Finnish Meteorological Institute, were planned to be included as
payload of
the
Fobos-Grunt mission,[33][34]
but weight constraints on
the spacecraft required dropping
the MetNet landers
from the
mission.[14]
Postponed 2009 launch
The
October 2009 launch date could not be achieved due to delays in
the spacecraft development. During 2009, officials admitted that
the schedule was very tight, but still hoped until
the last moment that a launch could be made.[30]
On 21 September 2009
the mission was officially announced to be delayed until
the next launch window in 2011.[14][35][36][37]
A main reason for
the delay was difficulties encountered during development of
the spacecraft's onboard computers. While
the Moscow-based company Tehkhom provided
the computer hardware on time,
the internal NPO Lavochkin team responsible for integration and software
development fell behind schedule.[38]
The retirement of NPO Lavochkin's head Valeriy N. Poletskiy in January
2010 was widely seen as linked to
the delay of
Fobos-Grunt. Viktor Khartov was appointed
the new head of
the company. During
the extra development time resulting
from the
delay, a Polish-built drill was added to
the Phobos lander as a back-up soil extraction device.[39]
2011 launch
The
spacecraft arrived at
Baikonur on 17 October 2011 and was transported to Site 31 for pre-launch
processing.[40]
The Zenit-2SB41 rocket carrying
Fobos-Grunt successfully lifted off
from Baikonur Cosmodrome at 20:16 UTC on 8 November 2011.[41]
The Zenit booster inserted
the spacecraft into an initial 207 km × 347 km (129 mi × 216 mi)
elliptical
low Earth orbit with an inclination of 51.4 degrees.[42]
Two firings of
the main propulsion unit in Earth orbit were required to send
the spacecraft onto
the interplanetary trajectory. Since both engine ignitions would have
taken place outside
the range of Russian ground stations,
the project participants asked volunteers around
the world to take optical observations of
the burns, e.g. with telescopes, and report
the results to enable more accurate prediction of
the mission flight path upon entry into
the range of Russian ground stations.[43]
Post-launch
Overview of planned trajectories.
Baikonour launch
First Burn
Spent fuel tank ejected
Second Burn (Departure to Martian system)
It was expected that after 2.5 hours and 1.7 revolutions in
the initial orbit,
the autonomous main propulsion unit (MDU), derived
from the
Fregat upper stage, would conduct its firing to insert
the spacecraft into
the elliptical orbit (250 km x 4,150–4,170 km) with a period of about 2.2
hours. After
the completion of
the first burn,
the external fuel tank of
the propulsion unit was expected to be jettisoned, with ignition for a
second burn to depart Earth orbit scheduled for one orbit, or 2.1 hours, after
the end of
the first burn.[42][44][45]
The propulsion module constitutes
the cruise-stage bus of
Fobos-Grunt. According to original plans, Mars orbit arrival had been
expected during September 2012 and
the return vehicle was scheduled to reach Earth in August 2014.[22][46]
Following what would have been
the planned end of
the first burn,
the spacecraft could not be located in
the target orbit.
The spacecraft was subsequently discovered to still be in its initial
parking orbit and it was determined that
the burn had not taken place.[3]
Initially, engineers had about three days
from launch to rescue
the spacecraft before its batteries ran out.[20]
It was
then established that
the craft's solar panels had deployed, giving engineers more time to
restore control. It was soon discovered
the spacecraft was adjusting its orbit, changing its expected re-entry
from late November or December to as late as early 2012.[47]
Even though it had not been contacted,
the spacecraft seemed to be actively adjusting its
perigee (the
point it is closest to Earth in its orbit).[47][48]
Contact
On 22 November 2011, a signal
from the
probe was picked up by
the
European Space Agency's tracking station in Perth, Australia, after it
had sent
the probe
the command to turn on one of its transmitters.
The
European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) in
Darmstadt
reported that
the contact was made at 20:25 UTC on 22 November 2011 after some
modifications had been made to
the 15 m dish facility in Perth to improve
its chances of getting a signal.[49]
No telemetry
was received in this communication.[50]
It remained unclear whether
the communications link would have been sufficient to command
the spacecraft to switch on its engines to take it on its intended
trajectory toward Mars.[51]
Roscosmos officials said that
the window of opportunity to salvage
Fobos-Grunt would close in early December.[51]
The
next day, on 23 November,
the Perth station again made contact with
the spacecraft and during 6 minutes, about 400 telemetry "frames" and
Doppler information were received.[50][52][53]
The amount of information received during this communication was not
sufficient, and
therefore it was not possible to identify
the problem with
the probe.[53][54]
Further
communication attempts made by ESA were unsuccessful and contact was not
reestablished.[55]
The space vehicle did not respond to
the commands sent by
the
European Space Agency to raise its orbit. Roscosmos provided
these commands to ESA.[50]
From
Baikonour, Kazakhstan, Roscosmos was able to receive telemetry
from
Fobos-Grunt on 24 November[56]
but attempts to contact it failed. This telemetry demonstrated that
the probe's radio equipment was working and that it was communicating
with
the spacecraft's flight control systems.[56]
Moreover, Roscosmos's top officials believed
Fobos-Grunt to be functional, stably oriented and charging batteries
through its solar panels.[50]
In a late November 2011 interview,
the service manager of
the European Space Agency for
Fobos-Grunt,
Wolfgang Hell, stated that Roscosmos had a better understanding of
the problem with
the spacecraft, saying
they reached
the conclusion that
they have some kind of power problem on board.[57]
ESA failed to communicate with
the space probe in all of
the five opportunities
the agency had between 28 and 29 November. During those occasions
the spacecraft did not comply with orders to fire
the engines and raise its orbit.
The Russian space agency
then requested that ESA repeat
the orders.[58]
The European Space Agency decided to end
the efforts to contact
the probe on 2 December 2011, with one analyst saying
Fobos-Grunt appeared "dead in
the water".[59]
However, ESA made teams available to assist
the
Fobos-Grunt mission if
there was a change in situation.[54]
In spite of that Roscosmos stated
their intention to continue to try to contact
the space vehicle until it entered
the atmosphere.[60]
The
US Strategic Command’s
Joint Space Operations Center (JSpOC) tracked
the probe and identified at
the start of December that
Fobos-Grunt had an elliptical orbit at an altitude of between 130 miles
(209 km) and 190 miles (305 km), but falling a few miles each day.[61][62]
Re-entry
Before reentry,
the spacecraft still carried about 7.51 metric tonnes of highly toxic
hydrazine and
nitrogen tetroxide on board.[4][20]
This was mostly fuel for
the spacecraft's upper stage.
These compounds, with melting points of 2 °C and −11.2 °C, are normally
kept in liquid form and were expected to burn out during re-entry.[20]
NASA veteran
James
Oberg said
the hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide "could
freeze before ultimately entering", thus contaminating
the impact area.[4]
He also stated that if
Fobos-Grunt is not salvaged, it may be
the most dangerous object to fall
from orbit.[4]
Meanwhile,
the head of Roscomos said
the probability of parts reaching
the Earth surface was "highly unlikely", and that
the spacecraft, including
the LIFE module and
the Yinghuo-1 orbiter, would be destroyed during re-entry.[20]
Russian military sources claimed that
Fobos-Grunt was somewhere over
the Pacific Ocean between New Zealand and South America when it
re-entered
the atmosphere at about 17:45 UTC.[63]
Although it was initially feared its remains would reach land as close as 145 km
west of
Santa Fe, Argentina,
the Russian military Air and Space Defense Forces reported that it
ultimately fell into
the Pacific Ocean, 775 miles (1,247 km) west of
Wellington Island, Chile.[6]
The Defence Ministry spokesman subsequently revealed that such estimate
was based on calculations, without witness reports. In contrast, Russian
civilian ballistic experts said that
the fragments had fallen over a broader patch of Earth's surface, and
that
the midpoint of
the crash zone was located in
the
Goiás state of Brazil.[64][65][66]
It was hoped that
the re-entry capsule might be recovered, giving at least some scientific
information in
the form of engineering assessment of
the capsule design, and life sciences data with
the
LIFE module, but
the spacecraft remains could not be found.[67][68][69]
Aftermath
Initially,
the head of Roscosmos
Vladimir Popovkin, suggested that
the
Fobos-Grunt failure might have been
the result of sabotage by a foreign nation.[70][71]
He also stated that risky technical decisions had been made because of limited
funding. On 17 January 2012, an unidentified Russian official speculated that a
U.S. radar stationed on
the
Marshall Islands may have inadvertently disabled
the probe, but cited no evidence.[72]
Popovkin suggested
the microchips may have been counterfeit,[73][74]
then he announced on 1 February that a burst of
cosmic radiation may have caused computers to reboot and go into a standby
mode.[75][76]
Industry experts cast doubt on
the claim citing how unlikely
the effects of such a burst are in low Earth orbit, inside
the protection of
Earth's magnetic field.[77]
On 6 February 2012,
the commission investigating
the mishap concluded that
Fobos-Grunt mission failed because of "a programming error which led to a
simultaneous reboot of two working channels of an onboard computer."
The craft's rocket pack never fired due to
the computer reboot, leaving
the craft stranded in Earth orbit.[78][79]
Although
the specific failure was identified, experts suggest it was
the culmination of poor quality control,[80][81]
lack of testing,[82]
and corruption.[83]
Russian president
Dmitry Medvedev suggested that those responsible should be punished and
perhaps criminally prosecuted.[73][84][85]
Repeat mission
In January 2012, scientists and engineers at
the
Russian Space Research Institute and
NPO Lavochkin called for a repeat sample return mission called
Fobos-Grunt-2[86]
for launch in 2018[87][88]
or 2020[89]
which was acknowledged in April 2012 by Roscosmos.[90][91][92][93]
Popovkin declared that
they would soon attempt to repeat
the
Fobos-Grunt mission, if an agreement was not reached for Russian
co-operation in
the
European Space Agency's
ExoMars
program.[94]
However, since an agreement was reached for
the inclusion of Russia as a full project partner,[95][96][97][98]
some instruments originally developed for
Fobos-Grunt would be flown in ExoMars.[99]
Russia’s financing of ExoMars could be partially covered by insurance payments
of 1.2 billion rubles ($40.7 million USD) for
the loss of
Fobos-Grunt,[98][100]
and reassigning funds for a possible coordination between
Mars-NET and ExoMars project.[101][102]
The
Roscosmos-ESA co-operation on ExoMars will thus probably delay any future
Russian sample-return mission to Phobos. Although Russian researchers and
scientists remain interested in pursuing such a mission in
the future,[103]
Roscosmos' resources are currently directed to ExoMars and
the Luna-Glob
mission to
the Moon.[90][104]
Roscosmos is also currently studying a proposal for a
Mars surface sample return mission called
Mars-Grunt.[102][105]
Objectives
Fobos-Grunt was an intended interplanetary probe that included a lander
to study Phobos and a sample return vehicle to return a sample of about 200 g
(7.1 oz) of soil to Earth.[1]
It was also to study Mars
from orbit, including its
atmosphere and dust storms, plasma and radiation.
Science goals
Delivery of samples of Phobos soil to Earth for scientific research of
Phobos, Mars and Martian vicinity;
In
situ and remote studies of Phobos (to include analysis of soil
samples);
Monitoring
the atmospheric behavior of Mars, including
the dynamics of dust storms;
Studies of
the vicinity of Mars, including its radiation environment,
plasma and dust;[22]
Study of
the origin of
the Martian moons and
their relation to Mars;
Study of
the role played by asteroid impacts in
the formation of terrestrial planets;
The
spacecraft's journey to Mars would take about ten months. After arriving
in Mars orbit,
the main propulsion unit and
the transfer truss would separate and
the Chinese Mars orbiter would be released.
Fobos-Grunt would
then spend several months studying
the planet and its moons
from orbit, before landing on
Phobos. It was imperative to prevent
the introduction to Mars of contaminants
from Earth; according to
Fobos-Grunt Chief Designer
Maksim Martynov,
the probability of
the probe accidentally reaching
the surface of Mars was much lower than
the maximum specified for Category III missions,
the type assigned to
Fobos-Grunt and defined in
COSPAR's
planetary protection policy (in accordance with
Article IX of
the Outer Space Treaty).[112][113]
On Phobos
The
planned landing site at Phobos was a region
from 5°S to 5°N, 230° to 235°E.[114]
Soil sample collection would begin immediately after
the lander touched down on Phobos, with collection lasting 2–7 days. An
emergency mode existed for
the case of communications breakdown, which enabled
the lander to automatically launch
the return rocket to deliver
the samples to Earth.[115]
A robotic arm would have collected samples up to 0.5 inches (1.3 cm) in
diameter. At
the end of
the arm was a pipe-shaped tool which split to form a claw.
The tool contained a piston which would have pushed
the sample into a cylindrical container. A light-sensitive photo-diode
would have confirmed whether
material collection was successful and also allowed visual inspection of
the digging area.
The sample extraction device would have performed 15 to 20 scoops
yielding a total of 3 to 5.5 ounces (85 to 160 g) of soil.[115]
The samples would be loaded into a capsule which would
then be moved inside a special pipeline into
the descent module by inflating an elastic bag within
the pipe with gas.[13][112]
Because
the characteristics of Phobos soil are uncertain,
the lander included another
soil-extraction device, a Polish-built drill, which would have been used in case
the soil turned out to be too rocky for
the main scooping device.[11][39]
After
the departure of
the return stage,
the lander's experiments would have continued in situ
on Phobos' surface for a year. To conserve power, mission control would have
turned
these on and off in a precise sequence.
The robotic arm would have placed more samples in a chamber that would
heat it and analyze its
Emission spectra. This analysis might have been able to determine
the presence of volatile compounds, such as water.[115]
Sample return to
Earth
The
return stage was mounted on top of
the lander. It would have needed to accelerate to 35 km/h (22 mph) to
escape Phobos' gravity. In order to avoid harming
the experiments remaining at
the lander,
the return stage would have ignited its engine once
the vehicle had been vaulted to a safe height by springs. It would
then have begun maneuvers for
the eventual trip to Earth, where it would have arrived in August 2014.[115]
An 11-kg descent vehicle containing
the capsule with soil samples (up to 0.2 kg (0.44 lb)) would have been
released on direct approach to Earth at 12 km/s (7.5 mi/s).[109]
Following
the aerodynamic braking to 30 m/s (98 ft/s)
the conical-shaped descent vehicle would perform a hard landing without a
parachute within
the Sary
Shagan test range in
Kazakhstan.[112]
The vehicle did not have any radio equipment.[11]
Ground-based radar and optical observations would have been used to track
the vehicle's return.[116]
Communications with
the spacecraft on
the initial parking orbit are described in a two-volume publication.[119]
Scientific critiques
Barry E. DiGregorio, Director of
the International Committee Against Mars Sample Return (ICAMSR),
criticised
the
LIFE experiment carried by
Fobos-Grunt as a violation of
the
Outer Space Treaty due to
the possibility of contamination of Phobos or Mars with
the microbial spores and live bacteria it contains should it have lost
control and crash-landed on either
body.[120]
It is speculated that
the heat-resistant extremophile bacteria could survive such a crash, on
the basis that Microbispora bacteria survived
the
Space Shuttle Columbia disaster.[121]
According to
Fobos-Grunt Chief Designer
Maksim Martynov,
the probability of
the probe accidentally reaching
the surface of Mars was much lower than
the maximum specified for Category III missions,
the type assigned to
Fobos-Grunt and defined in
COSPAR's
planetary protection policy (in accordance with
Article IX of
the Outer Space Treaty).[112][113]
^
abHarvey,
Brian (2007). "Resurgent –
the new projects".
The Rebirth of
the Russian Space Program (1st ed.). Germany:
Springer. pp. 326–330.
ISBN
978-0-387-71354-0.
^
abcdefghHarvey,
Brian (2007). "Resurgent –
the new projects".
The Rebirth of
the Russian Space Program (1st ed.). Germany:
Springer.
ISBN
978-0-387-71354-0.
M. Ya. Marov, V. S. Avduevsky, E. L.
Akim, T. M. Eneev, R. S. Kremnevich, S. D. Kulikovich, K. M. Pichkhadzec, G.
A. Popov, G. N. Rogovshyc (2004). "Phobos-Grunt: Russian sample return
mission". Advances in Space Research33 (12): 2276–2280.
Bibcode
2004AdSpR..33.2276M.
doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00515-5.
Rodionov, D. S.; Klingelhoefer, G.;
Evlanov, E. N.; Blumers, M.; Bernhardt, B.; Gironés, J.; Maul, J.;
Fleischer, I. et al. (2010). "The
miniaturized Möessbauer spectrometer MIMOS II for
the Phobos-Grunt mission". Solar System Research44
(5): 362.
Bibcode
2010SoSyR..44..362R.
doi:10.1134/S0038094610050023.
US
And Allies To Microchip All Citizens To Prevent
Bird Flu Pandemic
WDIM By: Sorcha
Faal, and as reported to her Western
Subscribers
Russian
infectious disease specialists are reporting
in
the Kremlin today that
the World
Health Organization (WHO)
is set to approve an ‘emergency measure’
mandating that all human beings on our
planet have implanted within
their bodies a newly invented
microchip said to be able to prevent
the deaths
of over a billion people from
the dreaded avian flu virus H5N1.
Prompting
this horrific WHO actions,
these reports continue, is Europe's
top semiconductor maker,
STMicroelectronics, announcement
of its development
of this new microchip, and as we can
read as reported by
the Reuters News Service, and as we
can read:
Indonesia,
the World’s largest Muslim Nation,
however, and which
the United Nations has stated is ‘losing
the battle against
the bird flu’,
has accused
the United States
of using
the avian flu virus to produce
biological weapons, and as we can read as
reported by China’s Xinhua News Service, and
as we can read:
Russian Military Analysts further
state in
these reports that
the United States,
and its Western Allies, have long sought to
microchip
their population, indeed
the entire World, to further
their goal
of establishing a New World Order
through
the establishment
of a One World Government, and
Religion, under
their complete control.
But,
these madmen in
the West have been constantly
thwarted in
their efforts to have mass public
acceptance for
the microchiping
of human beings by
their Christian believers, and who
say that such a scheme would introduce into
our World
their prophecies
of
the Anti-Christ, and who, according
to
these Christians, would seek to have
all
of humanity accept
the
Mark
of
the Beast.
The Christian’s prophetic book
of Revelations says about this ‘mark’
that,"He also forced
everyone, small and great, rich and poor,
free and slave, to receive a mark on his
right hand or on his forehead.",
and further
warns
of ‘eternal destruction’
for any human being accepting it.
It is, without doubt, clearly
apparent that
the United States, and its allies,
have embarked upon a course
of terrorizing
their citizens into
the accepting
of some
of
the most draconian laws meant to deny
them
their freedoms and liberties, and one
can, also, clearly see
these people accepting
these new microchips under
the belief that it will further
protect
them from
the dangers
they face.
But, one cannot help but wonder
what catastrophes lie ahead
for
these people when forced to accept
these microchips for ‘their
own good’ and threats to
their very lives should
they trade
their religious beliefs for those
of
their new Earth masters.
...
security cameras, television, microchips....even
the ability to control the weather, as a
step toward overcoming the seeming
limitations of the material world.
Oct 31,
2005 – In show 3 -
they said, "They were stealing dime-size
microchips." The microchips
downloaded virus information into cell
phones, and other...
The
microchips downloaded virus information
into cell phones, and other machines like
computers, etc. These viruses changed the
DNA of people to alien DNA.
Dogs
bearing tattoos and subcutaneous
microchips -- unmistakable forms of
identification -- were found in the kennel
supplying the Universities of Iowa and...
Feb 4, 2002
– There is Novato,
where there was a town resolution to install
microchips in pets, something that
serves as a bad harbinger. But none of these...
Jan 12,
2012 – Hitachi is
selling microchip technology to the
public, called the Mu chip,...The public has been
gradually drawn into accepting
microchips that...
File Format:
PDF/Adobe Acrobat have put
implants, microchips, alien
circuitry and foreign objects in me and all...performed mind
control on me, Groups that have put
implants, microchips, alien...
A microchip implant is an identifying
integrated circuit placed under the skin of a dog, cat, horse,
parrot or other animal. The chip, about the size of a large grain
...
Get a HomeAgain microchip for dogs or cats
and enroll in our annual membership program that enhances a pet
microchip with pet safety & wellness benefits.
Pet microchips and scanners from
Microchip ID Systems, HomeAgain, Pro ID and Avid. Sold to
breeders, pet owners and veterinarians. Register your micrcochip
...
May 26, 2012 – All about
Russia ... a bill that would
block its dangerous provisions from themselves.
...
Instead each pupil will be monitored with
microchips
Jul 24, 2012 –
In 2010, my book “Are You Ready for the
Microchip? ...The
built-in
and evolving
capacity of
microchip
technology makes this a dangerous
possibility......is
to be put
INTO and no people
in
Russia and other places not ON,...
Wide angle shot of the memory
microchip shown in detail below. The
microchips have a transparent window, showing the
integrated circuit inside. The window...
May 9, 2012 – What would you
do if someday the government made it mandatory for everyone to
receive an implantable
microchip for identification purposes?
Dec 11, 2011 – The
100-million dollar 'military' microchips market of
Russia is represented by Russian and Byelorussian
companies and 'Milandr' having over ...
Feb 1, 2012 – Counterfeit
microchips are suspected as a cause in the crash of a
Russian-Chinese space mission. The 14-ton Russian-made
vehicle hurtled ...
Feb 29, 2012 – Russian
Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said on Wednesday he is
considering the construction of plants to produce microchips
in ...
Apr 17, 2008 – The first
operations on electronic chips implantation were held in
Saint Petersburg Scientific Ear, Throat, Nose and Speech Research
Institute.
Within the dynamic world of nanotechnology, Russian
experts predict that by 2020 any individual will be able
to afford a microchip, which will store his or
her ...
Feb 11, 2010 – Russian
President Dmitry Medvedev on Thursday urged the government to lower
customs duties on imported microchips in a bid to spur the
...
The "TB-BIOCHIP" developed in the Engelhardt
Institute of Molecular Biology are able to detect over 95% of
TB-strains resistant to rifampin and above 80% of ...
Aug 26, 2010 – "The launch of the 90-nm microchip
production project is of considerable strategic importance for
Russia. Nanoelectronic production in Russia
...
In the vid, you can also see how in the Kenkeme
National Park near Yakutsk local farmers care Yakut horses, milk
mares, and what winter conditions they live in.
Jul 14, 2012 – However, the clear majority of this
information is about the possible
dangers to... “U.S. Military
Seeking
Implantable
Microchips
in Soldiers” ...
May 25, 2012 –
To ward off potential dangers from this,
Russia must start producing
the necessary
microchips itself as soon as
possible. According
to (then)...
