Dee Finney's blog
start date July 20, 2011
today's date April 27, 2014
page 572
TOPIC
YELLOWSTONE IS NOW OWNED BY CHINA - THEY GOT IT AS COLLATERAL AGAINST
U.S. DEBT TO THEM
CRITIQUE
OF
“Feds
Grant Eminent Domain as Collateral to China for U.S. Debts.”
by
Bernadine Smith
This is
written in response to criticisms regarding the article on eminent domain being
circulated, entitled: "Feds Grant Eminent Domain as Collateral to China for U.S.
Debts." Whether it is based on information gained or not, the
circumstances tie into facts that need to be taken into consideration, and it
most likely characterizes reality. In the least it could be a warning of
circumstances which need to be taken into consideration. The thoughts it
evokes is something dreadful, but these possibilities have to be dealt with!
Let's examine the similarity to the facts:
Things have changed ever since the socialists took over the oval office!
Take for instance, our policy of eminent domain. The traditional
policy in this country used to be that
public officials working in government could take control of land held by a
private person, and exercise "eminent domain" over such property, provided such
action met with certain justified constitutional requirements and public
approval. At least, that was the way it started out -- an essential
safety benefit and protection of the public. Then in 2005 the Kelo
Decision came before the Supreme Court. The Court's decision was that land could be
taken from one private owner and
given to another private owner,
simply on the basis that the new owner would generate more tax revenue.
That unbelievable and unfortunate court decision damaged the original intent of
the Bill of Rights affecting man's sovereignty, his sovereign right to own land,
and his right to receive due process.
I recall that while Bill Clinton was president he had some plan going with the
Chinese government to start about 8 new Chinese communities in 8 different U.S.
states. The idea at that time was to bring in communist Chinese, and their
families, into 8 different states to set up new communities. There was
opposition, and as far as I know, the idea is not active, as far as I know.
As I recall, most of the 8 communities, but not all, were designated to be
scattered in states comprising the lower half of the U.S. If that idea
ever becomes revived, it will have big help from the Kelo Decision and a lot of
condemnation proceedings will be practiced to provide adequate space for these
Chinese communities.
Would China be satisfied to get the power of eminent domain as collateral for
the new huge loan Sec. of State Hillary Clinton just managed to negotiate?
Hillary was over there. Two public officials were on television a few nights
ago, and one of them described Hillary "on her bended knee, begging China to
give us another loan". China had been unwilling to take on any more of our
debts. The only backing we have for our money is the words "full faith and
credit". If we collapse because of the poor management and continual
over-spending and inflation of this country's money, where is China's security
for their loan? What collateral did she come up with? There
has to be some worthwhile collateral for these massive loans being expended to
us from a shrewd country, especially on top of what we already owe them. Is it
possible that the federal government has already had to put up land as
collateral for previous debts? What else do we have to put up as
collateral? We have no gold. The federal government holds 50% of the
nation's land, which could be listed as collateral. We need to ask
"WHAT IS the collateral if we should be unable to pay this debt? The
Chinese read the paper and watch TV. They understand our stock market.
The situation begs the question: "How much of our physical assets has been used
as collateral?" In the least, we should be knowing exactly what the
collateral is! If our money is destroyed by more inflation, or if we go
bankrupt, surely the Chinese government is not expecting to recoup their
money in payments of "interest due figures", or wallpaper money. We
realize that much of our land has already been consigned, turned over to the United
Nations: Rivers, national parks, wetlands, Biosphere
reserves, Heritages such as Yellowstone National Park, Grand Canyon,
Independence Hall, etc., and dozens of other national treasures. Do we
have enough other federal land and sites left to cover for all we are borrowing
and spending hand over fist? Or will these huge loans also depend upon our
privately owned land?
If you wonder whether it would be possible for privately owned land to be
collateralized, remember back a few years ago when the National Association of
Realtors' president (Julio
S. Laguarta at the time, and
pictured in the article) warned in his speech to the International Real Estate
Federation in Toronto, Canada that "Failure
to change an official United Nations policy that explicitly opposes the right of
private property ownership will ultimately result in the destruction of our
industry." Mr. Laguarta then
criticized the United Nation's position on "no private ownership of land" as he
warned of and quoted the U.N.'s position as follows:
"Land,
because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot
be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and
subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Social justice,
urban renewal, and development, the provision of decent dwellings and health
conditions for people can only be achieved if
land is used in the interests of society as a whole."
Persons running the upcoming administrations under the "CHANGE" POLICY may be
forced to honor the no private
ownership of land policy!
Our government as a member of the U.N. has already had to adopt such a policy,
even though we are not told about it. This land policy has never been known to
have been rescinded. If there is not enough federal land left to pay off
the Federal Reserve, plus all those countries to whom we are now indebted, and
especially the gigantic debt we owe China, our ruling socialist elite may
try to pay off the debt by including our land (formerly privately owned) to
satisfy the investors! The money was borrowed in the name of the
people of the United States and the money borrowed will have to come from the
assets of the people. It is called a "crash!"
These issues may seem to many people that they cannot happen, but the debt is
there and it is real. We are going to be responsible for it in one
way or another. We need to understand more of the provisions in these
loans, and the consequences. Too few people have no idea that we
are not on the gold standard. FDR took us off the gold standard many
many years ago when he called all the gold in to pay other debts. THERE IS
NO GOLD behind our greenbacks! If we go bankrupt, a different ball game
with different rules will be played, especially now that the socialists have
taken over our country, and have acquired such world power. China
needs land. They are looking to gain it.
Please take time to go over these attachments of which there are a number. Wayne
Hage's article is one of the best
and is a must read.
Plenty of "sources" listed in there. I have added check marks on a
few of the important facts on some of the papers.
Note that "agencies" appears is some of the articles you are receiving.
"Agencies" are not responsible to the people! They are outside of and
beyond the people's authority - not beholden to any Constitutional restraint.
They are run by internationalists. If collateralizing our debts by using
our properties seems unreal, then please consider that our presidents don't
always have our best interest at heart. Ever since Pres. John Kennedy
signed the General & Complete Disarmament Law the Congress keeps funding
Kennedy's Public Law 87-297, the law which divests us of our total U.S. national
armed forces and transfers them to the United Nations on
a permanent basis. We will have no military! The same law also
forbids all law-abiding citizens from owning or having access to a firearm of
any kind.
When he was president, George W. Bush instituted a military government under the
name Homeland Security "Agency". The H.S.A. has merged the military with
the civilian law enforcement systems, something never done in a republic, if it
is to remain a republic. This altered concept of operation changes the United
States from a republic into a dictatorship. Obama is operating under
Presidential Directive Decision 51 (P.D.D. 51) which empowers the president to
be a dictator, and supersede
the power of the Congress. These are all just facts. What makes anyone
think that we don't have to examine what is happening, especially when
government leaders want to eliminate
the Constitution and replace it
with an already prepared world government constitution. Hopefully, this article
"Feds Grant Eminent Domain as Collateral to China for U.S. Debts." will bring
people out of their lethargy.
God bless
America!
FROM:
http://www.libertygunrights.com/CritiqueOfEminentDomain.html
Your Land: Collateral for the National Debt
Submitted by truth
supporter on Sun, 01/04/2009 -
21:05
FOURTH WORLD WILDERNESS
CONGRESS
Ninety percent of the
group consisted of conservationists, ecologists, government and United
Nations bureaucrats. The other ten percent were world
banking heavyweights, such as David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank,
London banker Edmund de Rothschild and the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury,
James Baker, who gave the keynote address.
During the first three
days, the group was told that the WILDERNESS CONGRESS was about beating the
ozone deterioration and bringing the rain forests back. The following days
were closed to the public. With only the bankers in attendance, the topics
discussed centered on the creation of a "WORLD CONSERVATION BANK" with
collateral being derived from receipt of wilderness properties throughout
the world. This bank would have central bank powers similar to the Federal
Reserve. It would create currency and loans and engage in international
discounting, counter-trade, barter and swap actions. Rothschild
personally conducted the monetary matters and the creation of this WORLD
CONSERVATION BANK. This bank
would refinance by swapping debt for assets. A country with a huge national
debt would receive money to pay off the debt by swapping the debt for
wilderness lands. The plan was to swap one trillion dollars of Third World
Debt into this new bank. In
the long term, when the countries won't be able to pay off the loans,
governments from around the world will give title to their wilderness lands
to the bankers.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-SCAM-behind-NAIS--Ou-by...
I consider Wayne Hage one of the most intelligent men I ever met. On our very
first visit he was explaining the World Bank, the International Monetary fund
and how the world bankers planned on collateralizing the world debt with land.
Not just the U.S. national debt, but also the "WORLD" debt.
A listener sent me a copy of a report of the FOURTH WORLD WILDERNESS CONGRESS,
which was held in Denver in 1987. Over 1500 people from sixty countries were
told that wilderness lands were to protect the reindeer, the spotted owl and
other endangered species. Ninety percent of the group consisted of
conservationists, ecologists, government and United Nations bureaucrats. The
other ten percent were world banking heavyweights, such as David Rockefeller of
Chase Manhattan Bank, London banker Edmund de Rothschild and the Secretary of
the U.S. Treasury, James Baker, who gave the keynote address. George W. Hunt, an
investment councilor, served as official host and sat in on all the meetings. It
was George Hunt that wrote the report from which I have gleaned much of my
information.
During the first three days, the group was told that the WILDERNESS CONGRESS was
about beating the ozone deterioration and bringing the rain forests back. The
following days were closed to the public. With only the bankers in attendance.
the topics discussed centered on the creation of a "WORLD CONSERVATION BANK"
with collateral being derived from receipt of wilderness properties throughout
the world. This bank would have central bank powers similar to the Federal
Reserve. It would create currency and loans and engage in international
discounting, counter-trade, barter and swap actions. Rothschild personally
conducted the monetary matters and the creation of this WORLD CONSERVATION BANK.
This bank would refinance by swapping debt for assets. A country with a huge
national debt would receive money to pay off the debt by swapping the debt for
wilderness lands. The plan was to swap one trillion dollars of Third
World Debt into this new
bank. In the long term, when the countries won't be able to pay off the loans,
governments from around the world will give title to their wilderness lands to
the bankers.
George Hunt wrote: "Title to the lands will go to the World Wilderness Land
Inventory Trust. This Trust will float into the World Conservation Bank by the
unanimous decree of the world's people, saying, God bless you for saving our
reindeer. Those people at the congress were ignorant. They don't suspect
anything. They're very naive. Not stupid, ignorant. I'm talking about the 90%
that were not the world banking heavyweights."
Hunt goes on to say that World Bank loans, as they stand now, are not
collateralized. They're saying, we want collateral, so when we loan-swap this
debt, we're going to own the Amazon if you default. They're going to make their
bad loans good by collateralizing them after the fact with all of this land and
somebody is going to end up with title to twelve and half billion acres. They
have multi-trillions of dollars upon which they can create currencies and loans
and they're going to begin to barter and counter-trade and loan-swap against the
United States. The World Conservation Bank is a scheme to monetize land. This
will function as a world central bank and out of that bank there will grow a
one-world fiat currency.
This isn't some scheme conjured up during the Bush and Clinton administrations.
The United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development was created
in 1982. The commission published the "BRUNDTLAND REPORT," setting the stage for
unlimited enactments to take over ecology, and environmental and pollution laws
throughout the world. The report stated: "We will have a proposal for very
harsh, quasi-spiritual ecological laws for MOTHER EARTH. A MOTHER EARTH COMES
FIRST mentality will arise throughout the world."
When James Baker made his keynote speech in 1987, he stated that, "No longer
will the World Bank carry this debt unsecured. The only assets we have to
collateralize are federal lands and national parks." Baker's definition of
federal lands includes Heritage sites, of which there are about 20 in the United
States. I say "about" 20, because they are being added on a regular basis. As I
write this article, Congress is about to vote on a proposed Rim of the Valley
National Park that would include over 500,000 acres of National Forest land and
170,000 parcels of private property including many farms and ranches. At the
same time there is a bill before Congress called the Northern Rockies Ecosystem
Protection Act that would increase the acreage of designated wilderness by 50%
in the lower 48 states. *** While our Heritage sites take in quite a large
amount of territory, such as Yellowstone National Park and Mesa Verde, the Grand
Canyon and the Everglades, other countries have much greater areas. Brazil for
example has the Amazon Conservation Complex and Canada has the Canadian Rocky
Mountain Parks. As I write this story, the list includes 851 properties in 141
countries, comprising over one third of the earth's land mass. Will all this
land collateralize the world's debt? Probably not, so along comes NAIS (the
National Animal Identification System).
According to the United States Department of Agriculture, "The first step in
implementing a national animal identification system (NAIS) is identifying
and registering premises that are associated with the animal agriculture
industry. In terms of the NAIS, a premise is any geographically unique location
in which agricultural animals are raised, held, or boarded. Under this
definition, farms, ranches, feed-yards, auction barns and livestock exhibitions
and fair sites are all examples of premises." That may be the definition some
government bureaucrat will give you, but the word "premises" under the
"international Criminal Court Act 2002- Sect 4, states: The word "premises"
includes a place and a "conveyance." Why check with the International Criminal
Court Act? Because on June 8, 2007, Under-Secretary of Agriculture Bruce Knight,
speaking at the World Pork Expo in Des Moines, Iowa, is quoted as saying, "We
have to live by the same international rules we're expecting other people to
do."
Throughout the entire Draft National Animal Identification System Users Guide,
land is referred to as a premises and not property. A "Premises" has no
protection under the Constitution of the United States, while property always
has the exclusive rights of the owner tied to it. The Fifth and Fourteenth
Amendments of the Constitution protect property rights.
The word "Premise" is a synonym for the word tenement. A definition of the word
tenement in law is: Property, such as land, held by one person "leasing" it to
another. Webster's New World Dictionary 1960 College Edition defines "Premises"
as the part of a deed or "lease" that states its reason, the parties involved
and the property in "conveyance." Webster then defines "conveyance" as the
transfer of ownership of real property from one person to another. It is quite
obvious that the bureaucrats in Washington had a very good reason to use the
term "premises" and never mention "PROPERTY."
Let's take another look at the wilderness areas and the World Bank's plans to
collateralize its loans. While the wilderness areas cover about one third of the
earth's surface, they are wilderness areas for a good reason they were useless
or difficult to homestead, farm or use in a constructive manner. Worldwide, the
best and more valuable land is occupied by farmers, ranchers and people with the
ambition to produce. Wouldn't the World Bankers rather have some productive
property besides mountains, deserts and swamps?
I am convinced that the word "premise" will put an encumbrance on your deed. The
bankers say they want to monetize land. It's your land and my land they want to
monetize.
The bankers are in the process of accumulating the wealth of the world. Very few
privately owned assets can be termed "real wealth." According to scripture, God
made Abraham very wealthy, giving him LAND, CATTLE, silver and gold. (Genesis
24:35) Four thousand years later, wealth continues to be LAND, CATTLE, silver
and gold. I don't know where the world deposits of silver and gold are stored,
but I'm sure the bankers have them in their control. That only leaves LAND and
CATTLE, which I believe could be next on the list. Genesis 47 describes how
Joseph had storehouses full of grain to feed the people, but he didn't have a
welfare program. During the first year of the famine, Joseph took "ALL THE
MONEY" the people had for only one year's supply of grain. The second year he
took all their cattle for another year's supply of grain. The next year they
said, "We have nothing left but our bodies and our land. Buy us and our land in
exchange for food and we and our land will be servants to Pharaoh." Genesis
47:21 states, "And as for the people, he removed them to the cities and made
slaves of them."
James Madison
made a statement concerning how our people could lose our freedom by gradual and
silent encroachment by those in power. Is it possible that those in power today
are gradually and silently in the process of removing the people to the cities
to make slaves of them? Federalizing our land and our cattle would certainly be
a step in that direction.
from
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-SCAM-behind-NAIS--Ou-by-Derry-Brownfield-081130-795.html
Yes, believe
it. The
U.S. debt is over $14 trillion, and is the sum of all outstanding debt owed
by the Federal Government. Nearly two-thirds is the public debt, which is
owed to the people, businesses and foreign governments who bought
Treasury bills, notes, and bonds (http://useconomy.about.com/od/fiscalpolicy/p/US_Debt.htm). A
country's external debt is part of the total debt of a country that is owed
to foreign creditors. These creditors may include other banks, governments,
corporations, and private individuals. For
the purposes of this post, I will use China as my example since it is the
largest external debt holder.
Some may
argue that this debt is backed by the full faith and credit of the United
States government. What does this
mean? It means, in very insidious
terms, the ability of the United States Government to infinitely tax the
hell out of American citizens to pay back debts. But,
if the system fails (i.e., government default, bankruptcy of the country,
and other similar SHTF events) and that taxpayer base no longer exists, that
debt still needs to be satisfied; as of October 2010, the major foreign
holder of treasury securities is China with 906.8 billion dollars. Second
is Japan with 877.4 billion dollars, and third is UK with 477.6 billion. It
is noteworthy to mention that oil exporters are fourth with 213.9 billion
dollars (http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/18/us-federal-deficit-china-america-debt).
While a little over 900 billion dollars is only a fraction of our debt,
it is still significant, especially since we continue to borrow more and
more from China. In 2009,
Speaking at his annual press
conference at the close of China's parliament, Chinese premier Wen
Jiabao said: "We have made a huge amount of loans to the United States.
Of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest,
I'm a little bit worried." He
called on Washington "to honor its words, stay a credible nation and
ensure the safety of Chinese assets" (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/13/china-us-economy).
Let me explain what the premier of China means. In
the United States, external federal debt has been collateralized with
our national lands, though the vast majority of the population is
unaware of this (http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-197641). Yes,
I know that this article is from 2008, but stay with me. It
all started in the Johnson administration when we allowed foreign
investors to buy part of our debt. During these years, beginning in
1964, more and more of our land was set aside in various categories,
such as wilderness and endangered species. Since all original wealth is
derived from the land, what it boils down to is that the natural
resources of this nation are being used as a collateral base for our
national debt (http://www.cblpi.org/resources/speech.cfm?ID=28).
In an article by former Congresswoman Helen
Chenoweth-Hage, she elaborates on the United Nations involvement in the
land grab:
One insidious program that has been eating away at our private property,
as well as at our sovereignty as a nation, has come from the United
Nations. It is called the "American Heritage Sites" and the "Man and
Biosphere Reserves Sites." As
a freshman in Congress, I went one day to visit Independence Hall in
Philadelphia in order to see the Liberty Bell. I discovered that the
Liberty Bell is now incased in a building that was built by the National
Park Service. As I stood in line waiting to go in, I noticed two plaques
in the brick walkways, one of which commemorated the site where John
Kennedy stood when he gave a
speech for a certain occasion, a great tribute to a great patriot. I
then went over to the second plaque, which commemorated the dedication
of this site to
the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization,
UNESCO. I was stunned––Independence Hall was under the jurisdiction of
UNESCO!
Realizing UNESCO uses one of two designations when targeting a site for
its control–– (1) Rural Heritage Sites, and (2) Biosphere Reserves––my
staff and I did some research. We discovered that exactly forty-seven
sites in America have been designated under the Man and Biosphere
Reserve, and twenty sites have been designated as Rural Heritage
sites––all under the jurisdiction of UNESCO. Among the sites designated
as Biosphere Reserves are the Coast Ranges in California, Cascade Head
in Oregon, the Central Gulf Coastal Plain in Florida, the Central Plains
in Colorado, the Adirondacks in New York and Vermont, the Everglades in
Florida, the New Jersey Pine lands, the Rocky Mountains in Colorado, the
Three Sisters in Oregon, and Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming and
Montana––and those are just a few examples of the stretch of the
Biosphere Reserves. Among the twenty World Heritage Sites are the
Carlsbad Caverns National Park, the Grand Canyon National Park, the
great Smokey Mountains in Tennessee and North Carolina, the Hawaiian
Volcanoes National Park, Independence Hall in Pennsylvania, the Liberty
Bell, the Olympic National Park, the Statue of Liberty in New York,
Yellowstone National Park, and Yosemite National Park––that is, our
national heritage and national treasures. After some studies, we found
that all the land that has been taken––land given away by the government
and currently under UN jurisdiction––would fill up the entire state of
Colorado. Hundreds of thousands of American lives have been laid down,
have been sacrificed to protect the sovereignty and land of our nation,
and then our government just turns around and gives our land away; its
jurisdiction has been handed over to others. This was too much (http://www.cblpi.org/resources/speech.cfm?ID=28).
What
happens when The United States government refuses to pay up? Do you
really think that we can continue borrowing based on full faith and
credit? I cannot imagine
China would buy more paper without some sort of collateral. As
much as I dislike him, Glenn Beck had an interesting take on this issue
at http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/glenn-beck/transcript/americas-banker-how-will-china-treat-deadbeat-borrowers
Look at some other countries that have defaulted or went bankrupt. Ireland http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=8324, Icelandhttp://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0904/S00068.htm,
and Greece http://www.thedailybell.com/1162/Greece-Sells-Islands.html
These types of events can happen to the United States if we go bankrupt. Don’t
think for a moment that the IMF, World Bank, and a consortium of other
nations couldn’t get together and pull the same shit on America. There
has never been a country in history that was too big to fail. While I
don’t know the eventual outcomes, I can predict possible outcomes based
on what information I have. The
only way for the United States to financially save itself is to stop
spending what we don’t have. For
those reading, as much as you might want to dismiss this as a case of
overly wrapped tinfoil, ask yourself this question: Do you believe that
the United States government truthfully cares about the rights and
freedoms of all American citizens? If
you do, I’m sorry you wasted your time reading this article.
FROM:
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1142768_Yes__The_National_Debt_Is_Collateralized___Long_Argument___WITH_POLL______.html
Biosphere Reserves:
- Big Bend National Park, Tx. (801,163 acres)
- Big Thicket National Preserve, TX (85,750 acres)
- Congaree Swamp National Monument (SC (22,200 acres)
- Death Valley National Monument, CA (2,067,628)
- Denali National Park and Preserve, AK (6,500,000 acres)
- Everglades National Park and
- Fort Jefferson National Monument, Fl. (1, 571,199 acres)
- Gates of the Arctic National Park and Preserver, AK (7,523,888acres)
- Glacier National Park, Mt (1,013,572 acres)
- Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve, AK (3,283,168 acres)
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park, TN/NC (520,269)
- Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, HI (229,177 acres)
- Isle Royale National Park, MI (571,790 acres)
- Joshua Tree National Monument, CA (559,954 acres)
- Kings Canyon National Park, CA (461,901 acres)
- Mammoth Cave National Park, KY (52,708 acres)
- Noatak National Preserve, AK (6,574,481 acres)
- Olympic National Park, WA (922,651 acres)
- Organ Pipe National Monument, AZ (330,689 acres)
- Redwood National Park, CA (110,232 acres)
- Rocky Mountain National Park (265,727 acres)
- Sequoia National Park, CA (402,482 acres)
- Virgin Islands National Park, VI (14,689 acres)
- Yellowstone National Park, WY (2,219,791 acres)
- See more at:
http://govtslaves.info/united-nations-taking-us-park-police/#sthash.d8vaO9ro.dpuf
In the last few years, the United Nations has purchased all the
state parks in the United States of America, and now they are
working on buying all major U.S. cities. But why? What is the
bigger picture? What is coming to America? The United Nations…