computer virus

Dee Finney's blog

start date July 20, 2011

Today's date August 31, 2011

page 36

8-31-11 -  I DREAMED THIS 5 TIMES.

There was a blurry scene of people and the statement over it.

"THE WORLD WILL END DIFFERENT THAN YOU HAVE KNOWN IT."

At the end of the fifth statement, the dream voice said, "The leaders will be Biden and Liebermann."

LATER - As I was contemplating the statement - the TV blurted out - 'different than you thought."

Biden and Liebermann don't see eye to eye on anything:

http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oGdVX3O15OyVUAdQxXNyoA;_ylc=X1MDUCMyNzY2Njc5BF9yAzIEYW8DMARmcgNzbHY4LWF0dARmcjIDc2J0bgRuX2dwcwMxBHF1ZXJ5A2JpZGVuIGxpZWJlcm1hbgRzYW8DMQR1bmRlZmluZWQDdW5kZWZpbmVkBHVuZGVmaW5lZAN1bmRlZmluZWQEdW5kZWZpbmVkA3VuZGVmaW5lZA--?p=biden+lieberman&fr2=sb-top&fr=slv8-att&type_param=

I spent all day dwelling on this, even meditating on it and getting some answers that made sense, but I still wasn't satisfied.  Finally, I just got so tired I fell asleep and got the answer in a dream.

The thing that would end the world as we know it that is different than what we thought - is A COMPUTER BOMB.

In my dream, I was working on a large screen computer monitor and looking at my e-mails.  I saw two e-mails that stood out from the others - they had short titles and were multicolored links.

The thing was - there were two of them I had received as e-mails.  If I clicked on one link to look at it, it activated the other one t destroy my computer and automatically sent the virus on to everyone else on my e-mail address book.

We've probably all had that happen to us before that destroyed our harddrive from working and had to buy a new computer.

But what if it got into government computers and THIS CAN AND DOEeS HAPPEN.  It happened in Iran recently where someone entered their nuclear facility and uploaded a virus with one of those little cheap hand held files that we can transfer files from one computer to another through a USB port.

If those computer bombs got into government computers, bank computers, wall street computers - it would wipe out society in minutes.

In my dream, the authorities caught the man after he jumped into a muddy river and almost drowned himself.  He was actually the same color as the mud when they dragged him out.  But it was too late to save the world.  The computer bombs had already done their dirty work.

 

NOTE FROM DEE:  I know that we all think this can't happen to us - we're too smart for that - we all have MacAfee or Norton or some other kind of program that kills Trojans, etc. before they can do any damage.  But what if these programs for one reason or another can't be fixed by computer virus experts?  What if its sneaked into a government, bank, or wall street computer before anyone knows it exists?????

 

Computer virus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with Malware.

A computer virus is a computer program that can replicate itself[1] and spread from one computer to another. The term "virus" is also commonly but erroneously used to refer to other types of malware, including but not limited to adware and spyware programs that do not have the reproductive ability. A true virus can spread from one computer to another (in some form of executable code) when its host is taken to the target computer; for instance because a user sent it over a network or the Internet, or carried it on a removable medium such as a floppy disk, CD, DVD, or USB drive.[2]

Viruses can increase their chances of spreading to other computers by infecting files on a network file system or a file system that is accessed by another computer.[3][4]

As stated above, the term "computer virus" is sometimes used as a catch-all phrase to include all types of malware, even those that do not have the reproductive ability. Malware includes computer viruses, computer worms, Trojan horses, most rootkits, spyware, dishonest adware and other malicious and unwanted software, including true viruses. Viruses are sometimes confused with worms and Trojan horses, which are technically different. A worm can exploit security vulnerabilities to spread itself automatically to other computers through networks, while a Trojan horse is a program that appears harmless but hides malicious functions. Worms and Trojan horses, like viruses, may harm a computer system's data or performance. Some viruses and other malware have symptoms noticeable to the computer user, but many are surreptitious or simply do nothing to call attention to themselves. Some viruses do nothing beyond reproducing themselves.

Academic work

The first academic work on the theory of computer viruses (although the term "computer virus" was not invented at that time) was done by John von Neumann in 1949 who held lectures at the University of Illinois about the "Theory and Organization of Complicated Automata". The work of von Neumann was later published as the "Theory of self-reproducing automata".[5] In his essay von Neumann postulated that a computer program could reproduce.

In 1972 Veith Risak published his article "Selbstreproduzierende Automaten mit minimaler Informationsübertragung" (Self-reproducing automata with minimal information exchange).[6] The article describes a fully functional virus written in assembler language for a SIEMENS 4004/35 computer system.

In 1980 Jürgen Kraus wrote his diplom thesis "Selbstreproduktion bei Programmen" (Self-reproduction of programs) at the University of Dortmund.[7] In his work Kraus postulated that computer programs can behave in a way similar to biological viruses.

In 1984 Fred Cohen from the University of Southern California wrote his paper "Computer Viruses - Theory and Experiments".[8] It was the first paper to explicitly call a self-reproducing program a "virus"; a term introduced by his mentor Leonard Adleman.

An article that describes "useful virus functionalities" was published by J. B. Gunn under the title "Use of virus functions to provide a virtual APL interpreter under user control" in 1984.[9]

Science fiction

The actual term "virus" was first used in a short story by David Gerrold in Galaxy magazine in 1969 - and later in his 1972 novel, When HARLIE Was One. In that novel, a sentient computer named HARLIE writes viral software to retrieve damaging personal information from other computers to blackmail the man who wants to turn him off.

The Terminal Man, a science fiction novel by Michael Crichton (1972), told (as a sideline story) of a computer with telephone modem dialing capability, which had been programmed to randomly dial phone numbers until it hit a modem that is answered by another computer. It then attempted to program the answering computer with its own program, so that the second computer would also begin dialing random numbers, in search of yet another computer to program. The program is assumed to spread exponentially through susceptible computers.

Virus programs

The Creeper virus was first detected on ARPANET, the forerunner of the Internet, in the early 1970s.[10] Creeper was an experimental self-replicating program written by Bob Thomas at BBN Technologies in 1971.[11] Creeper used the ARPANET to infect DEC PDP-10 computers running the TENEX operating system.[12] Creeper gained access via the ARPANET and copied itself to the remote system where the message, "I'm the creeper, catch me if you can!" was displayed. The Reaper program was created to delete Creeper.[13]

A program called "Elk Cloner" was the first computer virus to appear "in the wild"—that is, outside the single computer or lab where it was created.[14] Written in 1981 by Richard Skrenta, it attached itself to the Apple DOS 3.3 operating system and spread via floppy disk.[14][15] This virus, created as a practical joke when Skrenta was still in high school, was injected in a game on a floppy disk. On its 50th use the Elk Cloner virus would be activated, infecting the computer and displaying a short poem beginning "Elk Cloner: The program with a personality."

The first PC virus in the wild was a boot sector virus dubbed (c)Brain,[16] created in 1986 by the Farooq Alvi Brothers in Lahore, Pakistan, reportedly to deter piracy of the software they had written.[17]

Before computer networks became widespread, most viruses spread on removable media, particularly floppy disks. In the early days of the personal computer, many users regularly exchanged information and programs on floppies. Some viruses spread by infecting programs stored on these disks, while others installed themselves into the disk boot sector, ensuring that they would be run when the user booted the computer from the disk, usually inadvertently. PCs of the era would attempt to boot first from a floppy if one had been left in the drive. Until floppy disks fell out of use, this was the most successful infection strategy and boot sector viruses were the most common in the wild for many years.[1]

Traditional computer viruses emerged in the 1980s, driven by the spread of personal computers and the resultant increase in BBS, modem use, and software sharing. Bulletin board-driven software sharing contributed directly to the spread of Trojan horse programs, and viruses were written to infect popularly traded software. Shareware and bootleg software were equally common vectors for viruses on BBS's.[citation needed]

Macro viruses have become common since the mid-1990s. Most of these viruses are written in the scripting languages for Microsoft programs such as Word and Excel and spread throughout Microsoft Office by infecting documents and spreadsheets. Since Word and Excel were also available for Mac OS, most could also spread to Macintosh computers. Although most of these viruses did not have the ability to send infected email messages, those viruses which did take advantage of the Microsoft Outlook COM interface.[citation needed]

Some old versions of Microsoft Word allow macros to replicate themselves with additional blank lines. If two macro viruses simultaneously infect a document, the combination of the two, if also self-replicating, can appear as a "mating" of the two and would likely be detected as a virus unique from the "parents".[18]

A virus may also send a web address link as an instant message to all the contacts on an infected machine. If the recipient, thinking the link is from a friend (a trusted source) follows the link to the website, the virus hosted at the site may be able to infect this new computer and continue propagating.

Viruses that spread using cross-site scripting were first reported in 2002

,[19] and were academically demonstrated in 2005.[20] There have been multiple instances of the cross-site scripting viruses in the wild, exploiting websites such as MySpace and Yahoo.

Infection strategies

In order to replicate itself, a virus must be permitted to execute code and write to memory. For this reason, many viruses attach themselves to executable files that may be part of legitimate programs. If a user attempts to launch an infected program, the virus' code may be executed simultaneously. Viruses can be divided into two types based on their behavior when they are executed. Nonresident viruses immediately search for other hosts that can be infected, infect those targets, and finally transfer control to the application program they infected. Resident viruses do not search for hosts when they are started. Instead, a resident virus loads itself into memory on execution and transfers control to the host program. The virus stays active in the background and infects new hosts when those files are accessed by other programs or the operating system itself.

Nonresident viruses

Nonresident viruses can be thought of as consisting of a finder module and a replication module. The finder module is responsible for finding new files to infect. For each new executable file the finder module encounters, it calls the replication module to infect that file.

Resident viruses

Resident viruses contain a replication module that is similar to the one that is employed by nonresident viruses. This module, however, is not called by a finder module. The virus loads the replication module into memory when it is executed instead and ensures that this module is executed each time the operating system is called to perform a certain operation. The replication module can be called, for example, each time the operating system executes a file. In this case the virus infects every suitable program that is executed on the computer.

Resident viruses are sometimes subdivided into a category of fast infectors and a category of slow infectors. Fast infectors are designed to infect as many files as possible. A fast infector, for instance, can infect every potential host file that is accessed. This poses a special problem when using anti-virus software, since a virus scanner will access every potential host file on a computer when it performs a system-wide scan. If the virus scanner fails to notice that such a virus is present in memory the virus can "piggy-back" on the virus scanner and in this way infect all files that are scanned. Fast infectors rely on their fast infection rate to spread. The disadvantage of this method is that infecting many files may make detection more likely, because the virus may slow down a computer or perform many suspicious actions that can be noticed by anti-virus software. Slow infectors, on the other hand, are designed to infect hosts infrequently. Some slow infectors, for instance, only infect files when they are copied. Slow infectors are designed to avoid detection by limiting their actions: they are less likely to slow down a computer noticeably and will, at most, infrequently trigger anti-virus software that detects suspicious behavior by programs. The slow infector approach, however, does not seem very successful.

Vectors and hosts

 This section does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2011)

Viruses have targeted various types of transmission media or hosts. This list is not exhaustive:

PDFs, like HTML, may link to malicious code. PDFs can also be infected with malicious code.

In operating systems that use file extensions to determine program associations (such as Microsoft Windows), the extensions may be hidden from the user by default. This makes it possible to create a file that is of a different type than it appears to the user. For example, an executable may be created named "picture.png.exe", in which the user sees only "picture.png" and therefore assumes that this file is an image and most likely is safe, yet when opened runs the executable on the client machine.

An additional method is to generate the virus code from parts of existing operating system files by using the CRC16/CRC32 data. The initial code can be quite small (tens of bytes) and unpack a fairly large virus. This is analogous to a biological "prion" in the way it works but is vulnerable to signature based detection. This attack has not yet been seen "in the wild".

Methods to avoid detection

In order to avoid detection by users, some viruses employ different kinds of deception. Some old viruses, especially on the MS-DOS platform, make sure that the "last modified" date of a host file stays the same when the file is infected by the virus. This approach does not fool anti-virus software, however, especially those which maintain and date Cyclic redundancy checks on file changes.

Some viruses can infect files without increasing their sizes or damaging the files. They accomplish this by overwriting unused areas of executable files. These are called cavity viruses. For example, the CIH virus, or Chernobyl Virus, infects Portable Executable files. Because those files have many empty gaps, the virus, which was 1 KB in length, did not add to the size of the file.

Some viruses try to avoid detection by killing the tasks associated with antivirus software before it can detect them.

As computers and operating systems grow larger and more complex, old hiding techniques need to be updated or replaced. Defending a computer against viruses may demand that a file system migrate towards detailed and explicit permission for every kind of file access.

Avoiding bait files and other undesirable hosts

A virus needs to infect hosts in order to spread further. In some cases, it might be a bad idea to infect a host program. For example, many anti-virus programs perform an integrity check of their own code. Infecting such programs will therefore increase the likelihood that the virus is detected. For this reason, some viruses are programmed not to infect programs that are known to be part of anti-virus software. Another type of host that viruses sometimes avoid are bait files. Bait files (or goat files) are files that are specially created by anti-virus software, or by anti-virus professionals themselves, to be infected by a virus. These files can be created for various reasons, all of which are related to the detection of the virus:

Since bait files are used to detect the virus, or to make detection possible, a virus can benefit from not infecting them. Viruses typically do this by avoiding suspicious programs, such as small program files or programs that contain certain patterns of 'garbage instructions'.

A related strategy to make baiting difficult is sparse infection. Sometimes, sparse infectors do not infect a host file that would be a suitable candidate for infection in other circumstances. For example, a virus can decide on a random basis whether to infect a file or not, or a virus can only infect host files on particular days of the week.

Stealth

Some viruses try to trick antivirus software by intercepting its requests to the operating system. A virus can hide itself by intercepting the antivirus software’s request to read the file and passing the request to the virus, instead of the OS. The virus can then return an uninfected version of the file to the antivirus software, so that it seems that the file is "clean". Modern antivirus software employs various techniques to counter stealth mechanisms of viruses. The only completely reliable method to avoid stealth is to boot from a medium that is known to be clean.

Self-modification

Most modern antivirus programs try to find virus-patterns inside ordinary programs by scanning them for so-called virus signatures. A signature is a characteristic byte-pattern that is part of a certain virus or family of viruses. If a virus scanner finds such a pattern in a file, it notifies the user that the file is infected. The user can then delete, or (in some cases) "clean" or "heal" the infected file. Some viruses employ techniques that make detection by means of signatures difficult but probably not impossible. These viruses modify their code on each infection. That is, each infected file contains a different variant of the virus.

Encryption with a variable key

A more advanced method is the use of simple encryption to encipher the virus. In this case, the virus consists of a small decrypting module and an encrypted copy of the virus code. If the virus is encrypted with a different key for each infected file, the only part of the virus that remains constant is the decrypting module, which would (for example) be appended to the end. In this case, a virus scanner cannot directly detect the virus using signatures, but it can still detect the decrypting module, which still makes indirect detection of the virus possible. Since these would be symmetric keys, stored on the infected host, it is in fact entirely possible to decrypt the final virus, but this is probably not required, since self-modifying code is such a rarity that it may be reason for virus scanners to at least flag the file as suspicious.

An old, but compact, encryption involves XORing each byte in a virus with a constant, so that the exclusive-or operation had only to be repeated for decryption. It is suspicious for a code to modify itself, so the code to do the encryption/decryption may be part of the signature in many virus definitions.

Polymorphic code

Polymorphic code was the first technique that posed a serious threat to virus scanners. Just like regular encrypted viruses, a polymorphic virus infects files with an encrypted copy of itself, which is decoded by a decryption module. In the case of polymorphic viruses, however, this decryption module is also modified on each infection. A well-written polymorphic virus therefore has no parts which remain identical between infections, making it very difficult to detect directly using signatures. Antivirus software can detect it by decrypting the viruses using an emulator, or by statistical pattern analysis of the encrypted virus body. To enable polymorphic code, the virus has to have a polymorphic engine (also called mutating engine or mutation engine) somewhere in its encrypted body. See Polymorphic code for technical detail on how such engines operate.[21]

Some viruses employ polymorphic code in a way that constrains the mutation rate of the virus significantly. For example, a virus can be programmed to mutate only slightly over time, or it can be programmed to refrain from mutating when it infects a file on a computer that already contains copies of the virus. The advantage of using such slow polymorphic code is that it makes it more difficult for antivirus professionals to obtain representative samples of the virus, because bait files that are infected in one run will typically contain identical or similar samples of the virus. This will make it more likely that the detection by the virus scanner will be unreliable, and that some instances of the virus may be able to avoid detection.

Metamorphic code

To avoid being detected by emulation, some viruses rewrite themselves completely each time they are to infect new executables. Viruses that utilize this technique are said to be metamorphic. To enable metamorphism, a metamorphic engine is needed. A metamorphic virus is usually very large and complex. For example, W32/Simile consisted of over 14000 lines of Assembly language code, 90% of which is part of the metamorphic engine.[22][23]

Vulnerability and countermeasures

The vulnerability of operating systems to viruses

Just as genetic diversity in a population decreases the chance of a single disease wiping out a population, the diversity of software systems on a network similarly limits the destructive potential of viruses. This became a particular concern in the 1990s, when Microsoft gained market dominance in desktop operating systems and office suites. Microsoft software is targeted by virus writers due to their desktop dominance.

Although Windows is by far the most popular target operating system for virus writers, viruses also exist on other platforms. Any operating system that allows third-party programs to run can theoretically run viruses.

An Internet based experiment revealed that there were cases when people willingly pressed a particular button to download a virus. Security analyst Didier Stevens ran a half year advertising campaign on Google AdWords which said "Is your PC virus-free? Get it infected here!". The result was 409 clicks.[24][25]

As of 2006[update], there were relatively few security exploits targeting Mac OS X (with a Unix-based file system and kernel).[26] The number of viruses for the older Apple operating systems, known as Mac OS Classic, varies greatly from source to source, with Apple stating that there are only four known viruses, and independent sources stating there are as many as 63 viruses. Many Mac OS Classic viruses targeted the HyperCard authoring environment. The difference in virus vulnerability between Macs and Windows is a chief selling point, one that Apple uses in their Get a Mac advertising.[27] In January 2009, Symantec announced the discovery of a trojan that targets Macs.[28] This discovery did not gain much coverage until April 2009.[28]

While Linux, and Unix in general, has always natively blocked normal users from having access to make changes to the operating system environment, Windows users are generally not. This difference has continued partly due to the widespread use of administrator accounts in contemporary versions like XP. In 1997, when a virus for Linux was released – known as "Bliss" – leading antivirus vendors issued warnings that Unix-like systems could fall prey to viruses just like Windows.[29] The Bliss virus may be considered characteristic of viruses – as opposed to worms – on Unix systems. Bliss requires that the user run it explicitly, and it can only infect programs that the user has the access to modify. Unlike Windows users, most Unix users do not log in as an administrator user except to install or configure software; as a result, even if a user ran the virus, it could not harm their operating system. The Bliss virus never became widespread, and remains chiefly a research curiosity. Its creator later posted the source code to Usenet, allowing researchers to see how it worked.[30]

The role of software development

Because software is often designed with security features to prevent unauthorized use of system resources, many viruses must exploit software bugs in a system or application to spread. Software development strategies that produce large numbers of bugs will generally also produce potential exploits.

Anti-virus software and other preventive measures

Many users install anti-virus software that can detect and eliminate known viruses after the computer downloads or runs the executable. There are two common methods that an anti-virus software application uses to detect viruses. The first, and by far the most common method of virus detection is using a list of virus signature definitions. This works by examining the content of the computer's memory (its RAM, and boot sectors) and the files stored on fixed or removable drives (hard drives, floppy drives), and comparing those files against a database of known virus "signatures". The disadvantage of this detection method is that users are only protected from viruses that pre-date their last virus definition update. The second method is to use a heuristic algorithm to find viruses based on common behaviors. This method has the ability to detect novel viruses that anti-virus security firms have yet to create a signature for.

Some anti-virus programs are able to scan opened files in addition to sent and received email messages "on the fly" in a similar manner. This practice is known as "on-access scanning". Anti-virus software does not change the underlying capability of host software to transmit viruses. Users must update their software regularly to patch security holes. Anti-virus software also needs to be regularly updated in order to recognize the latest threats.

One may also minimize the damage done by viruses by making regular backups of data (and the operating systems) on different media, that are either kept unconnected to the system (most of the time), read-only or not accessible for other reasons, such as using different file systems. This way, if data is lost through a virus, one can start again using the backup (which should preferably be recent).

If a backup session on optical media like CD and DVD is closed, it becomes read-only and can no longer be affected by a virus (so long as a virus or infected file was not copied onto the CD/DVD). Likewise, an operating system on a bootable CD can be used to start the computer if the installed operating systems become unusable. Backups on removable media must be carefully inspected before restoration. The Gammima virus, for example, propagates via removable flash drives.[31][32]

Recovery methods

A number of recovery options exist after a computer has a virus. These actions depend on the virus. Some may be safely removed by functions available in most anti-virus software products. Others may require re-installation of damaged programs. It is necessary to know the characteristics of the virus involved to take the correct action, and anti-virus products will identify known viruses precisely before trying to "dis-infect" a computer; otherwise such action could itself cause a lot of damage. New viruses that anti-virus researchers have not yet studied therefore present an ongoing problem, which requires anti-virus packages to be updated frequently.

Virus removal

One possibility on Windows Me, Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 is a tool known as System Restore, which restores the registry and critical system files to a previous checkpoint. Often a virus will cause a system to hang, and a subsequent hard reboot will render a system restore point from the same day corrupt. Restore points from previous days should work provided the virus is not designed to corrupt the restore files or also exists in previous restore points.[33] Some viruses, however, disable System Restore and other important tools such as Task Manager and Command Prompt. An example of a virus that does this is CiaDoor. However, many such viruses can be removed by rebooting the computer, entering Windows safe mode, and then using system tools.

Administrators have the option to disable such tools from limited users for various reasons (for example, to reduce potential damage from and the spread of viruses). A virus can modify the registry to do the same even if the Administrator is controlling the computer; it blocks all users including the administrator from accessing the tools. The message "Task Manager has been disabled by your administrator" may be displayed, even to the administrator.[citation needed]

Users running a Microsoft operating system can access Microsoft's website to run a free scan, provided they have their 20-digit registration number. Many websites run by anti-virus software companies provide free online virus scanning, with limited cleaning facilities (the purpose of the sites is to sell anti-virus products). Some websites allow a single suspicious file to be checked by many antivirus programs in one operation.

Operating system reinstallation

Reinstalling the operating system is another approach to virus removal. It involves either reformatting the computer's hard drive and installing the OS and all programs from original media, or restoring the entire partition with a clean backup image. User data can be restored by booting from a Live CD, or putting the hard drive into another computer and booting from its operating system with great care not to infect the second computer by executing any infected programs on the original drive; and once the system has been restored precautions must be taken to avoid reinfection from a restored executable file.

These methods are simple to do, may be faster than disinfecting a computer, and are guaranteed to remove any malware. If the operating system and programs must be reinstalled from scratch, the time and effort to reinstall, reconfigure, and restore user preferences must be taken into account.

See also

Monitor padlock.svg Computer security portal

References

  1. ^ a b Dr. Solomon's Virus Encyclopedia, 1995, ISBN 1897661002, Abstract at http://vx.netlux.org/lib/aas10.html
  2. ^ Jussi Parikka (2007) "Digital Contagions. A Media Archaeology of Computer Viruses", Peter Lang: New York. Digital Formations-series. ISBN 978-0-8204-8837-0, p. 19
  3. ^ http://www.bartleby.com/61/97/C0539700.html
  4. ^ "What is a Computer Virus?". Actlab.utexas.edu. 1996-03-31. http://www.actlab.utexas.edu/~aviva/compsec/virus/whatis.html. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
  5. ^ von Neumann, John (1966). "Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata". Essays on Cellular Automata (University of Illinois Press): 66–87. http://cba.mit.edu/events/03.11.ASE/docs/VonNeumann.pdf. Retrieved June 10., 2010.
  6. ^ Risak, Veith (1972), "Selbstreproduzierende Automaten mit minimaler Informationsübertragung", Zeitschrift für Maschinenbau und Elektrotechnik, http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~risak/bilder/selbstrep.html
  7. ^ Kraus, Jürgen (February 1980), Selbstreproduktion bei Programmen, http://vx.netlux.org/lib/pdf/Selbstreproduktion%20bei%20programmen.pdf
  8. ^ Cohen, Fred (1984), Computer Viruses - Theory and Experiments, http://all.net/books/virus/index.html
  9. ^ Gunn, J.B. (June 1984). "Use of virus functions to provide a virtual APL interpreter under user control". ACM SIGAPL APL Quote Quad archive (ACM New York, NY, USA) 14 (4): 163–168. ISSN 0163-6006. http://portal.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=801093&type=pdf&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=93800866&CFTOKEN=49244432.
  10. ^ "Virus list". http://www.viruslist.com/en/viruses/encyclopedia?chapter=153310937. Retrieved 2008-02-07.
  11. ^ Thomas Chen, Jean-Marc Robert (2004). "The Evolution of Viruses and Worms". http://vx.netlux.org/lib/atc01.html. Retrieved 2009-02-16.
  12. ^ Jussi Parikka (2007) "Digital Contagions. A Media Archaeology of Computer Viruses", Peter Lang: New York. Digital Formations-series. ISBN 978-0-8204-8837-0, p. 50
  13. ^ See page 86 of Computer Security Basics by Deborah Russell and G. T. Gangemi. O'Reilly, 1991. ISBN 0937175714
  14. ^ a b Anick Jesdanun (1 September 2007). "School prank starts 25 years of security woes". CNBC. http://www.cnbc.com/id/20534084/. Retrieved 2010-01-07.
  15. ^ "The anniversary of a nuisance". http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/09/03/computer.virus.ap/. [dead link]
  16. ^ "Boot sector virus repair". Antivirus.about.com. 2010-06-10. http://antivirus.about.com/od/securitytips/a/bootsectorvirus.htm. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
  17. ^ "Amjad Farooq Alvi Inventor of first PC Virus post by Zagham". YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m58MqJdWgDc. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
  18. ^ Vesselin Bontchev. "Macro Virus Identification Problems". FRISK Software International. http://www.people.frisk-software.com/~bontchev/papers/macidpro.html.
  19. ^ Berend-Jan Wever. "XSS bug in hotmail login page". http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2002/Oct/119.
  20. ^ Wade Alcorn. "The Cross-site Scripting Virus". http://www.bindshell.net/papers/xssv/.
  21. ^ "Virus Bulletin : Glossary - Polymorphic virus". Virusbtn.com. 2009-10-01. http://www.virusbtn.com/resources/glossary/polymorphic_virus.xml. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
  22. ^ Perriot, Fredrick; Peter Ferrie and Peter Szor (May 2002). "Striking Similarities" (PDF). http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/reference/simile.pdf. Retrieved September 9, 2007.
  23. ^ "Virus Bulletin : Glossary — Metamorphic virus". Virusbtn.com. http://www.virusbtn.com/resources/glossary/metamorphic_virus.xml. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
  24. ^ "Need a computer virus?- download now". Infoniac.com. http://www.infoniac.com/offbeat-news/computervirus.html. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
  25. ^ ""Is your PC virus-free? Get it infected here!" « Didier Stevens". Blog.didierstevens.com. 2006-10-23. http://blog.didierstevens.com/2007/05/07/is-your-pc-virus-free-get-it-infected-here/. Retrieved 2010-08-27.
  26. ^ "Malware Evolution: Mac OS X Vulnerabilities 2005-2006". Kaspersky Lab. 2006-07-24. http://www.viruslist.com/en/analysis?pubid=191968025. Retrieved August 19, 2006.
  27. ^ Apple - Get a Mac
  28. ^ a b Sutter, John D. (22 April 2009). "Experts: Malicious program targets Macs". CNN.com. http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/04/22/first.mac.botnet/index.html. Retrieved 24 April 2009.
  29. ^ McAfee. "McAfee discovers first Linux virus". news article. http://math-www.uni-paderborn.de/~axel/bliss/mcafee_press.html.
  30. ^ Axel Boldt. "Bliss, a Linux "virus"". news article. http://math-www.uni-paderborn.de/~axel/bliss/.
  31. ^ "Symantec Security Summary — W32.Gammima.AG." http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2007-082706-1742-99
  32. ^ "Yahoo Tech: Viruses! In! Space!" http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/103826
  33. ^ "Symantec Security Summary — W32.Gammima.AG and removal details." http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2007-082706-1742-99&tabid=3

Further reading

External links


 

UK News

Hackers target Government websites with computer virus

Hackers have attacked government websites with a computer virus, allowing them to steal the personal data of visitors.

By Jon Swaine

11:44AM BST 23 Jul 2008

In the past fortnight Eastern European hackers have infected more than a thousand British websites with the virus, known as Asprox, including those belonging to local government offices and the NHS, it has been claimed.

Asprox last week infected the Norfolk NHS website, which is used by thousands of people every day to access local services. Twelve local council websites, including that of Hackney Council in London, were also compromised, putting at risk hundreds of residents logging on to pay their council tax.

Web experts have said that unlike conventional computer viruses, which spread through email or illicit websites, Asprox lies on mainstream sites, waiting to infect the computers of those who visit. Once it does, it can allow a hacker to access sensitive information, and steal files, emails or passwords.

Security experts say that it has so far spread to about two million computers worldwide. Any computer not protected by the most up-to-date anti-virus software is vulnerable to the virus.

It is thought that several people have discovered that their computers have been infected only after they found money had been removed from their bank accounts or that they had suffered other frauds committed using their personal data.

Detective Constable Bob Burls, from the Metropolitan Police computer crime unit, confirmed that there had been a sudden rise in the number of computers being infected by Asprox.

He said: "The virus got into the job pages of a local council's internet page. It's a new thing that people who visit mainstream websites are clobbered."

"We've dealt with two major websites in as many weeks," he said.

Yuval Ben-Itzhak, the chief technical officer of Finjan, the internet security company who first exposed the threat of Asprox, said: "This is very serious threat. Five years ago when your computer got infected by a virus, you noticed immediately that your PC was broken. These days, you don't notice anything."

The virus has not been confined to Government sites.

Visitors to Nigella Lawson's official website were last week also put at risk, as the chef's home page was attacked by Asprox. However, a spokesman for Ms Lawson said that the problem was dealt with "instantly" and that none of her fans was infected.

Pentagon Cyber Network Attacked by Devastating Virus

Posted by DR. CLARISSA PINKOLA ESTÉS, Managing Editor of TMV, and Columnist in Politics, War.
Nov 20th, 2008 | 5 responses

According to Fox news, the Pentagon’s computer network has been breached, but to what extent is not clear.

Unnamed sources are speaking about ‘a devastating virus.’ Orders have been given to cease using all phone drives and other external drives

One wonders about what billy goat gruff has not been leaving his/ her dorm while eating delivery pizza for breakfast, lunch and dinner…and plotting how to un-knit the five-armed sweater … a/k/a: the Pentagon’s electronic arterial system.

From Stars and Stripeswhere it already Friday, to our Thursday: by Jennifer Svan and David Allen. The article tells about how there appear to have been plenty of warnings this was coming… but from where?

The Defense Department has banned the use of removable flash media and storage devices from all government computers, according to a series of notices put out by the services this week.

The action comes following reports that a worm virus known as “Agent.btz” was discovered infecting some DOD networks, according to Wired magazine.

LeAnne MacAllister, 5th Signal Command’s director of Strategic Communication, U.S. Army Europe, said this week that leadership directed her office to stop using thumb drives — portable memory devices used to store or transfer files.

A separate internal Army e-mail told some government

computer users across Europe to turn in all removable media devices.

In an e-mail sent Thursday to all Navy European customers in Naples, officials said “effective immediately all USB Thumb drives, memory sticks/cards and camera flash cards are PROHIBITED from use on any Navy Network (NIPR or SIPR) until further notice.”

A worldwide directive issued Thursday by the Marine Corps offered similar restrictions.

“The only authorized media for use on DOD networks is media purchased and provided by the government,” the Marine announcement said. “Under no circumstances will personally owned removable media be considered mission essential or used on government networks.”

DOD officials at the Pentagon would not confirm the ban.

For security reasons, DOD officials won’t discuss “specific measures commanders in the field may be taking to protect and defend our networks,” said Air Force Lt. Col. Eric Butterbaugh, a DOD spokesman.

But Wired magazine, citing an internal Army e-mail on its online edition Wednesday, said the ban comes from the commander of U.S. Strategic Command and applies to both the secret SIPR and unclassified NIPR nets.

The worm virus “Agent.btz” is a variation of an older worm that copies itself to removable USB drives from infected computers and then spreads itself to whatever new systems it is connected to through USB ports, Wired reported.

The worm seriously degrades computer performance by copying itself to multiple programs.

The ban includes memory sticks, thumb drives and camera flash memory cards, according to the Marine Corps directive. External hard disk drives are not included in the ban.

Butterbaugh said DOD’s Global Information Grid includes more than 17,000 local- and regional-area networks and approximately 7 million individual computersFROM  http://themoderatevoice.com/24502/pentagon-cyber-network-attacked-by-devastating-virus/

Computer Worm Hits Iran Power Plant

Computer Worm Affects Computers at Iran's First Nuclear Power Station

Published September 26, 2010

| Associated Press

Iran Nuke Site

AP

Aug. 21: The reactor building of Bushehr nuclear power plant, just outside the southern city of Bushehr, Iran.

TEHRAN, Iran – A complex computer worm capable of seizing control of industrial plants has affected the personal computers of staff working at Iran's first nuclear power station weeks before the facility is to go online, the official news agency reported Sunday.

The project manager at the Bushehr nuclear plant, Mahmoud Jafari, said a team is trying to remove the malware from several affected computers, though it "has not caused any damage to major systems of the plant," the IRNA news agency reported.

It was the first sign that the malicious computer code, dubbed Stuxnet, which has spread to many industries in Iran, has also affected equipment linked to the country's nuclear program, which is at the core of the dispute between Tehran and Western powers like the United States.

Experts in Germany discovered the worm in July, and it has since shown up in a number of attacks -- primarily in Iran, Indonesia, India and the U.S.

The malware is capable of taking over systems that control the inner workings of industrial plants.

In a sign of the high-level concern in Iran, experts from the country's nuclear agency met last week to discuss ways of fighting the worm.

The infection of several computers belonging to workers at Bushehr will not affect plans to bring the plant online in October, Jafari was quoted as saying.

The Russian-built plant will be internationally supervised, but world powers are concerned that Iran wants to use other aspects of its civil nuclear power program as a cover for making weapons. Of highest concern to world powers is Iran's main uranium enrichment facility in the city of Natanz.

Iran, which denies having any nuclear weapons ambitions, says it only wants to enrich uranium to the lower levels needed for producing fuel for power plants. At higher levels of processing, the material can also be used in nuclear warheads.

The destructive Stuxnet worm has surprised experts because it is the first one specifically created to take over industrial control systems, rather than just steal or manipulate data.

The United States is also tracking the worm, and the Department of Homeland Security is building specialized teams that can respond quickly to cyber emergencies at industrial facilities across the country.

On Saturday, Iran's semi-official ISNA news agency reported that the malware had spread throughout Iran, but did not name specific sites affected.

  • P

  • Think Before You Click! ‘Here You Have…’ a Major Computer Virus

    If your internet seemed a little slower today, or perhaps not even there at all at times, blame this: a major computer virus spread via email slamming servers at some heavy-duty websites. Affected sites include Google, NASA and Comcast. Computer World reports the virus is spread via a worm that comes attached

    to an email that typically has a subject line reading, “Here you have…” Anyone unwary enough to click on what looks like a link to a PDF embedded in the message is directed to a site that asks to download a screensaver file onto your computer. Users who are truly asleep at the wheel and click okay to install the screensaver are gifted with a worm that then propagates to the victim’s contact list.

    Admins who confronted this cyber-disaster today must have felt like it was 2001 all over again:

    The worm is similar to the ILoveYou and Anna Kournikova worms, which spread in 2000

  • HERE ARE SOME VIDEOS TO WATCH ABOUT COMPUTER VIRUSES
  • http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oGdV0B.15OTwgAPilXNyoA?ei=UTF-8&fr=slv8-att&p=youtube.com+pc+virus&SpellState=&fr2=sp-qrw-corr-top

 

CONTINUED ON PAGE 37  

August 31, 2011

http://www.greatdreams.com
http://www.earthmountainview.com

 

 
































more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704082104575515581009698978.html#ixzz1WfJbPGJs