But this allied extraterrestrial race is far from being the only one to visit us, and to supervise us like neurotic children.  There are other benevolent races but also malevolent races.  The difficulty of comprehension comes from the fact that these races are, for the majority, immaterial (luminous or invisible); except when atomic weapon detonate upon Earth, thereby materializing their vessels, and destroying the spirits of Nature existing in another reality. 

According to any probability, the majority will cease reading this text starting from this line.  My reflections will seem to you to be delirious. If I announce to you that the military industrial complex directs your country under one form or another, and that this same complex is covertly influenced by malevolent extraterrestrial that seek total domination of humanity after having partially destroyed it, that will seem to be a conspiracy theory from some cheap tabloid.

What is delirious, actually, is the cover up of silence and misinformation that has prevailed for sixty years on the extraterrestrial subject.  What is delirious is the nuclear war that certain leaders, or advisers of leaders, prepare us for, in the name of peace!  One coldly announces a preventive war with the atomic weapon to us, by standardizing this one with the row of conventional weapons, to fight against the spread of atomic weapons! 

Consequently, the preventive attack seems to be the option chosen by certain extraterrestrials by means of a heavenly object, mysteriously burst asunder in 1995, to minimize its own devastating effects on Earth.  Schwassmann-Wachmann should strike the Earth around MAY 25, 2006 as a public warning.  Except if, of course, the leaders go into reverse.  That enormously will depend on you, of the actions that you will take to convince them of their folly! 

What occured for extraterrestrials, as I suspect it, to transform in 1995 a comet into a weapon of massive super destruction?  1994 is the year that saw an upsurge of interest in the UFO Roswell crash, but also, to choke this, there was a hoaxed film of an alien autopsy; importantly, the United States of America decides behind the scenes to implement the National Missile Defense, i.e. the Star Wars program!  This program cannot objectively be intended for a terrestrial potential enemy as claimed by the government.  The enemy was extraterrestrial! 

We see here that the government secrecy policy combined with the aggressive behavior of the military were enough for some extraterrestrials to prepare a preemptive shot at the Earth. In the next few days, we are precisely facing important strategic decisions for the fate of the world.

Consequently, vis-a-vis the nuclear armada created by humanity, vis-a-vis the laser program of directed energy weapons, certain ‘star visitors’ have taken "convincing" measures and decided on the use of a first public warning for MAY 25, 2006, a few weeks before the launching of the nuclear offensive against Iran, involving an escalating potential for planetary atomic war which, I point out it, would destroy whole or part of the planes of existence, invisible in our eyes, where the ‘star visitors’ live. 

Events accelerate but the consciousness of individuals remain deadened.  We are in the ignorance of the danger that the scientists and the soldiers, the politicians and the religious orders have consciously created here for nearly sixty years.  They knew of this connection between UFOs and nuclear weapons.  If it were not so, they would not have manufactured 4000 times the nuclear capacity needed for the destruction of two sub-continents.  The danger is imminent today because, for the first time in human history, a war with destructive atomic weapons is marked on the calendar for 2006. 

This war - as any other in the history - constitutes a real danger to our extraterrestrial neighbors.  Failing to take these remarks seriously, they will let us brutally know it.  But we can react while letting our extraterrestrial allies know that we understand what’s at stake.  By circulating as widely as possible, even on a purely anonymous basis, the World Referendum "Do you wish us to Show Up?", perhaps we will increase the chances of a peaceful resolution of the extraterrestrial question.  The era of human fraternity would become thus a reality. 

The enemies of humanity are human and extraterrestrial, just as extraterrestrials are also humanity’s allies.  Our remaining time is but a few days.  If we alert our leaders and our fellow-citizens by widely diffusing the extraterrestrial message[i] and this article that each one is free to translate and make known, the worst should be avoided.  The comet fragment, probably still invisible for our measuring instruments, would then be destroyed by the extraterrestrial ones which can protect its trajectory, as has already occurred in the past. 

Sooner or later, one always meets one more extreme than oneself.  Better it is then to build peace within our civilization, before it takes-off into space. 

After this possible public warning of MAY 25, 2006 , the next projectile could be much larger and infinitely more destructive to the point of eliminating the human race from the surface of the Earth as suggested in the crop circle "Missing Earth".  The logic of the highest bidder is extremely likely to took us towards the worst outcome.  It is thus now, I believe, we should choose to act!  Perhaps you can personally save a few million lives...

Notes  

More graphics of the near-miss

[1] http://www.exopoliticsinstitute.org/Eric-Julien-extrait-Montagne.doc

[1] http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/24mar_73p.htm

[1] http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/db?rec=900444

[1] 1 AU = 1 Astronomical Unit = 149 597 871 kilometers

[1] http://www.swirlednews.com/article.asp?artID=659

[1] http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/24mar_73p.htm

[1] http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/24mar_73p.htm

[1] http://www.objetvolant.com/html/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=5755#53816

[1] http://www.swirlednews.com/article.asp?artID=673

[1] http://www.swirlednews.com/

[1] http://www.etreferendum.com/

[1] Enfants des Etoiles, Désirez-vous nous voir apparaître ?, éditions JMG, avril 2006

[1] http://www.exopoliticsinstitute.org/EricJulien-EDE-extraits.doc

[1] http://www.exopoliticsinstitute.org/Journal-vol-1-3-Julien.doc

[1] Ryan Wood, Majic Eyes Only: Earth’s Encounters with Extraterrestrial Technology (Wood Enterprises 2005).

[1] La Science des Extraterrestres, éditions JMG, juillet 2005.

[1] Drawing by Elaine Thompson.

[1] http://www.etreferendum.com/

[iv] 1 AU = 1 Astronomical Unit = 149 597 871 kilometers

---

Article #2

Translated from the French: 

This night meditation of April 7, 2006 thus led me to receive on behalf of creatures which I earlier describe as extratemporelles  [extraterrestrials] a date - that of MAY 25, 2006 - dependent on an extremely lucid vision of giant catastrophe three years ago. I duly consigned this vision, like others to come, in a ouvrage[1] published recently. , 

Then, having spoken about this communication in a forum français, I learned that a split up comet, 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 (SW-3), was precisely to pass very close from the Earth in May 2006, and that 25 this month precisely corresponded to the crossing, by split up comet, of the plane of the ecliptic on which the Earth is.

This surprising "coincidence", of which the probability borders a chance on a few million, must be examined in detail. Let us recall that the fragmentation of comet SW-3 took place in 1995 under strange conditions and that only three fragments were seen. Since this date the comet carried out two elliptic revolutions around the sun.

Here is a comment of Philippe Morel of the Astronomical Company of France: "On June 6, 2006 it will enter again the very restricted circle of the comets whose distance nearest to the Earth will be lower than 15 million kilometers. Accustomed to passages closer to the Earth than comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 (SW3) had approached us with the Astronomical distance from 0.0617 Unit (UA) in 1930. "

 

 

There are 175 comets referred as short period, of which the most famous is Halley's Comet. The table above shows the passages closer than comet SW-3. Having been discovered in 1930 by Arnold Schwassmann and Arno Arthur Wachmann in May 1930, it is seen indeed that it passed nearest in 1930. 

But in May 2006, the passage is closer in, for the fragment S which will interest us, estimated at 0,0487 UA (7,3 million kilometers). It is true that the majority of the fragments should pass on average to 0,065 UA, but it is enough for ONLY ONE FRAGMENT to start a major event. What to thus say this restricted circle of comets is less than 8 million kilometers?

Only two passages to 0,03 UA for Halley (837 after JC), and 0,04 UA for C/1132 T1 (1132) did better than the fragment S of SW-3! But they were not fragmented, and thus not likely to deviate, by gravitation, towards the Earth.

In May 2006, SW-3 will be not only among the rare ones to also approach close to the Earth, but also among comets having known the greatest magnitude ever reached. This is the first time that a fragmented comet crosses our road at such a short distance.  It is thus the first time in the known history which such an event will have taken place. The predictions of the astronomers are not thus founded on any historical scientific asset in the very precise case which occupies us.

What do we see in the remarkable one? Three essential elements appear clearly for our comprehension of the stake. What is striking initially is the existence of three different cometary trajectories. Then, we see four "groups" of objects: With, Y, B-X and S. Enfin, the distances between "groups" are very large. For example, 25 million kilometers separate fragment A from the fragment S. It should be indicated that at the date of April 18 a twenty-second fragment appeared, fragment Z. It is not mentioned here but belongs to the group of B with X. In the same way, April 19, thirteen other fragments, noted AA with AM, made their appearance while resulting from this same group B-X.

I call the fragments A, Y and S "groups fragments" for two reasons. Initially parce we are unaware of the existence of inobservable fragments bus too small around these principal fragments. Then because while approaching the Earth, these fragments A, Y and S doubtless will split up themselves.

We immediately see in the figure above that it does not act at all of a "collar of pearls" as announced here and there. With the origin, in 1995, the astronomers saw four fragments then three (A, B, C), the fourth having been vaporized and/or made invisible by its size.

Taking into account the distance separating the groups between them we let us deduce an "abnormal" activity from it. Indeed, the three fragments of origin (A, B, C) are in front of, on the trajectory of fragment A. Something thus slowed down the fragment S, either in a small explosion having moved away in direction opposed Y and S, or by a voluntary braking. In both cases, there is no reason so that there are not other fragments around, and especially behind S.

We see that the fragment S is an extremely serious candidate for a collision with the Earth. If it is not the fragment S, it can be a fragment, still inobservable per hour when I write, being with the back of this one. Let us observe the alignment of the "collar of pearls". The plan of the ecliptic is represented below by a green straight line.

In the two following diagrams we visualize the trajectory that the fragment S, or another resulting from S, can borrow. Seen top (first appears below) the trajectory of collision is registered perfectly between the extremes.

In the same way, taking into account the variations of distance in height in a sight "of profile", it is not improbable that a fragment moves towards the Earth on a trajectory "parallel" with the others (see below). The angular difference between the blue and orange slopes is only of 5°, identical to the difference between the trajectories "known" after the plan of the ecliptic (represented here by a green straight line)

I recall that I was unaware of the existence of this comet when I received the date of MAY 25, 2006 for the realization of my visions of catastrophe in the Atlantic? It is important to take some precautions on the assumption that some would affirm that it was obvious that such an event was to occur. It is thanks to extraterrestrial that I learned much on the man...

Actually, in spite of appearances, the OBJECTIVE chances of a catastrophe are statistically very mean. This is why, when that arrives, the reasons of this one, the intervention of extraterrestrial for reason of nuclear weapons, will remain engraved in the memory of the people because such an intervention is necessary!

To be complete on the question, we must present an alternative to the scenario which I presented. You will find below the trajectories relative (sight of top and profile) of three groups of objects for the dates of 1st, 5, MAY 15, and 25 2006. These three groups are the group of fragments B-X, S and the asteroid 2006 GY2 about which I spoke higher. At the three dates indicated taken independently, there is no risk, as indicates it clearly the figures. On left the sights of top are, on the right the sights of profile. The asteroid 2006 GY2 is in is a potential danger with its point with more close to the Earth of 0,0171 UA (MAY 16, 2006), a diameter from 500 to 1000 meters and a speed of relative approach compared to the Earth of 20 km/s.

But the true danger is perhaps indirect. Indeed, this asteroid 2006 GY2 will pass in the medium of the group of fragments SW-3B-X which forms in fact a swarm much larger than on the figures (see the figures of the preceding pages). This danger comes at the same time from its convergent trajectory at worst the moment (approach with more), of its one kilometer broad size and its relative speed of 5 km/s (20 km/s (asteroid) less 15 km/s (comet)) accounting for 18000 all the same kilomètres/heure, eighteen times speed of sound. This speed of approach constitutes a very great danger to the Earth because the struck fragments would be not only deviated towards the Earth, but, would have moreover acquired an increased speed of collision, increasing terribly the power of striking of the object.

May 5, 2006

SW-3B represents here a group of 40 fragments!

End of article #2

---

TO UNDERSTAND THE TSUNAMI OF MAY 25, 2006.

By Eric Julien, MAY 3, 2006.

This is the third article on my prediction of huge tsunami in the Atlantic Ocean on MAY 25, 2006. It aims first of all at safeguarding the lives of the coastal populations around the Atlantic Ocean where a fragment from comet SW-3 will impact, involving a brutal awakening of underwater volcanoes.

We will reveal aspects which were not covered, until now, in the preceding articles – namely, the direct and indirect incidences of the impact of a comet fragment. We will highlight, in a forthcoming article, the major reasons (beyond natural appearances) which may generate this major catastrophe so that, in the immediate future, we may manifest our collective destiny as well as possible. Of course, I will approach the concrete consequences for the populations.

Let us initially point out the essential facts which pushed me to spend a very great amount of energy to communicate with the public on this future event, considering that I've earnestly made affirmations that we are protected from the main comet fragments. Last April 7th, I received the telepathic message of extraterrestrial entities indicating that the vision of a giant tsunami received three years earlier was going to occur on MAY 25, 2006. I then learned of the existence of a fragmented comet, which not only passed more closer to Earth in MAY 2006, but which was to pass through the ecliptic plane on MAY 25! I have the retrospective proof of my vision substantiated by the registered copyright of my second book who presents it.

It's a one-in-a-million chance that such a fortuitous “coincidence” took place! Similarly, it is more “improbable” that my contacts had also given me the information on the earthquake of Bam in Iran at the end of 2003. Furthermore, the principles of the 'Science of the Extraterrestrials', having been accepted by many scientists, also allowed them the incredible exploits by hundreds observing thousands of UFO in the past. Additionally, since my first article on this event, I have received many testimonies of people having had the same vision of giant waves in the Atlantic, particularly for the end of MAY 2006.

Therefore, I invite each one to request for a happy end, to visualize a future free from misfortunes. By doing this, I'm acting on my affirmation. It is necessary for all to warn our fellow-citizens about the risk of large wave - possibly 200 meters in the most exposed areas - around May 25, 2006 (the Ascension Day for Christians). The majority of them are precisely around the Atlantic. By chance?

To avoid any panic by relying on the assumption of timely, forthcoming alert, the precautions to be taken are very simple: Move away from the coasts and to go up on the heights sufficiently early, and even the day before. Remember that those which declare that no impact will occur on May 25, 2006 will not be there to provide you shelter at the proper time, nor your beloved ones. You will be surprised, alone and without help from them. Warn people around you. Save lives at the end of May 2006 !

It is not “The End Of The World!” being considered here. It is only an application of PRUDENCE regarding the potential of a major catastrophe of which we must minimize the effects on the lives that are at risk.

Some reminders.

Astronomers are informed of the existence of a certain number of comet fragments but are technically incapable of counting them all. A great number of them could drastically threaten the Earth without ANYBODY knowing anything about it until a few days, or even hours before impact. This is an irrefutable scientific fact!

One will be able to confuse you with statistical conjectures about the probability of such an event, but in the balance, the factors will equally bear the same weight as the opposing assumptions. It is a scientific fact, especially considering the crash landing of two space shuttles was a scientific fact. They belonged to NASA, which implies that previously withheld vital information on this comet of was used to support claims that the comet fragments do not represent a danger. In statistical terms, two out of four represents a 50% error in accuracy by NASA. Historical patterns support this conclusion.

Astronomers remembered the asteroid 2002 MN, a hundred meters wide, which they could detect only AFTER it had passed within less 120,000 kilometres of Earth, a third of the distance between the Earth and the Moon. Also, let's speak about 2004 FH, about 30 m in diameter, located only three days before it passed to 43,000 kilometres of our planet. These are FACTS.

Similarly, NO ONE on this planet understands the reasons of the fragmentation of the comet 73P/SW-3 in 1995 in the first place! I still consider the relevance of the two crop circles of extraordinary importance for our common destiny that appeared two months later. Let's initially recall that a crop circle called "galaxy" had forewarned, only five years earlier, one of the greatest solar flare periods of our history. This suggests that the authors of this geometric language, the extraterrestrials, have the capacity to travel in or envision the future. The crop circles of which I speak, "Asteroid" and "Missing Earth", were adequately detailed in my preceding article. Let us suggest that these are proof that these advanced intelligences, cloaked behind the event of MAY 25 2006, have envisaged, and caused, long in advance, the scenario that proceeds in this event.

After a long period of cold war between extraterrestrial and human, concurrently evidenced by abductions and nuclear tests comes a precursor, what is more accurately called the Apocalypse (i.e. the Revelation of their existence in the world), generated by a “premeditated” major catastrophe. This upheaval does not constitute the end of the world but is a warning intended to prohibit the use of our nuclear weapons (which attack them in their plane of existence). Works of an Italian physicist , Gorgio Fontana, offers precise conclusions in support of the scientific contribution (Absolute Relativity) by my extraterrestrial contacts (Science of the Extraterrestrials), who wrote to me recently:

"Absolute Relativity is a real variant of Special Relativity!!! (...) It may happen that the effect of nuclear explosions can affect millions of parallel worlds, which we cannot see."

There are two extraterrestrial factions. One of them is opposed to this comet striking. It is that which I consider by ethical principle. The following image synthesizes the normal path of this comet, fragmented in 1995 in an unexplainable way.

The figures hereafter point out the conditions of approach of the fragments of the comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, being concurrent with this article are already 61. These figures result from the data obtained by the site of the Near Earth Object Program within NASA

The representation above is a "photograph" provided May 14, 2006, a date on which the most important fragments, whose fragment B indicated here, gain critical global attention for astronomical projections regarding their proximity to the Earth (red circle).

 

This second illustration shows the relative “top view” position of the fragments. We clearly see  that the orange trajectory of one “identified” comet fragment, unobservable at the moment, is perfectly between the most extreme parameters (trajectories of the fragments Y and S).

 

The perspective of the same fragments above implies a weak angular difference between the “officially” located fragments and another possible deviation in fragment trajectory. Below, the figure represents the orientation of the comet tail compared to the trajectory of the core (fragment B and C mainly). This orientation is primarily due to solar wind. In the case of SW-3, the tail will be also made up of abnormally large fragments. The Earth will cross this tail approximately MAY 24, 2006. The risks of MAY 25 are substantial.

A deep study on comet SW-3 was published... one year ago, in May 2005. It shows that the Earth would be swept by a meteor shower in May 2006 named Tau Herculids, precisely coming from comet SW-3. Many comets have a long plume that the sun creates or facilitates. This plume widens under, more or less, due to strong influence of the gravitation of other planets, in particular, Jupiter, which is the largest planet of the solar system. Originally, it appeared that the comet had a size of 1.5 kilometres. The study estimates 64,000 small pieces were released by SW-3!

However, between the end of 2002 and mid-2003, when SW-3 had its slowest speed, Jupiter and Saturn influenced the previously fragmented comet. The relative positions of these planets tended to cause the fragments to deviate towards the outside of the elliptic orbit of the comet. In other words, this gravitational action strongly supported trajectories of collision with the Earth.

Knowing that speeds of ejection can reach a hundred meters a second due to the exceptional outburst which SW-3 experienced, one can imagine that fragments are very dispersed. For example, the ejection speed of 30 meters a second, due to the worsening gravitational influence evidenced above since the beginning of the fragmentation of SW-3, represents more than 10 million kilometres between the main core and ejected fragments. The principal fragments will pass between 9 and 12 million kilometres of us. This results in our being exactly in the middle of the meteor cloud!

In spite of the empirical data provided in the aforementioned study, calculated by a Gaussian distribution of the fragments around the principal core, many unknown factors remain, particularly the fragmentation of SW-3. Fragment S is an obvious example. All the scientific debate about the collision, pro and con, of a fragment with the Earth comes from primitive evaluations, as the study referred to above reveals. In short, my critics assure safety, bolstered by press releases, predicated upon a hypothesis eclipsed by an enormous unknown factor that they prefer to evade.

This unknown factor is extraterrestrial intervention. Of course, no astro-mathematical model applies to extraterrestrial intervention! This is what I recently explained to a physicist who clings to Newtonian Physics. The safety of millions of people rests in the hands of very questionable theoretical study based on a traditional model for ejection of comet fragments whereas the original circumstances of these ejections were not traditional.

Regardless of counterclaims, accelerated fragmentations of B and G at the end of April 2006 has startled astronomers. It gets even better, NASA's deceiving “short-sightedness” was revealed in "convenient” updating of data! More than disconcerting, it is highly suspect. NASA's press release on my collision alert of May 25, 2006 was disseminated on an international scale, after my interview had taken place on April 24 on the main stream Coast to Coast AM radio show with George Noory, NASA sent out a press release on April 27^th reassuring the public about the unpredictable character of this comet. It directly coincided with my prediction! It was not uplifting for me, but instilled greater doubt and distrust. I benefited by checking the data of the fragments on NASA's Near Earth Object Program after Elder Hale informed me that George Noory had expressed new concerns during a later broadcast which referenced NASA's Near Earth Object Program, revealing new, disconcerting data.

“Imagine my surprise” - of course I expected the news about fragment S, having previously emphasized its dangerously abnormal character. NASA's auspicious press release served to increase support my recent warnings. And not just a little: More than 1.5 million kilometres! This suggested to me that this could be expected, so I later checked NASA's belated data on fragments M, N, P, Q, and R at the same time as the fragment S, referenced March 24^th - No notable change! Happily, I kept the proof of this likely deception, as illustrated by the figure of the fragment S below. It will probably remain archived.

One sees well in bottom on the left a distance of 0,0497 Astronomical Unit. Today, it is around 0.0750 AU, that is to say close to 1.5 million kilometres of additional distance according to NASA's spurious distortion of astrophysics. Two assumptions: Either it is an error which one corrected, (and that means that NASA can still make errors) or, NASA's uncertain! The assertions of NASA on  April 27^th were premature at best.

Either there is INFORMATION HIDDEN FROM THE PUBLIC in connection with certain fragments, or it is even more serious! In both cases, my vision seriously gains credit from a purely scientific point of view. The continuation will confirm it.

Still recently (checked at the date of this article), extremely curious data appeared on the table of short distances objects of the Near Earth Object Program :

Object Close-Approach Date (TDB) YYYY-mmm-DD HH:MM ± D_HH:MM Miss Distance Nominal (LD/AU) Miss Distance Minimum  (LD/AU) V relative (km/s) V infinity (km/s) N sigma H (mag)   73P/Schwassmann- Wachmann 3-BD  2006-May-11 21:53 ±   11:11 33.7/0.0867 0.04/0.00010 14.79 14.78 3 n/a

 

 

 

 

The posted distances are 0.04 Lunar Distance or 0.00010 Astronomical Unit. This fragment SW-3BD would thus pass infinitely closer than the other fragments hitherto identified, since it should be at the date of MAY 11, 2006, with the third of the distance Earth - Moon. Two details raise the doubt. It appears with the first line on a list of 70 heavenly objects to be noticed! Particularly, it will pass to 21h53 (2+1+5+3=11) more or less 11H11. This last figure is esoterically known to imply “synchronicity”. It would appear that the person who wrote the data within NASA's Near Earth Object Program wants to “reveal” a message to the world saying : "It is a deliberate error exposing that this table is false!". If it is false, my hypothesis is plausible, and especially the worst of it.

 

Impact in the Atlantic.

In the images below, I endeavored to visualize the trajectory of a hypothetical piece of comet. By doing this, I wanted to check if my vision of eruption of underwater volcanoes, after noon, in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, and close to the tropic of Cancer, corresponded to the available scientific data. Then I reproduced the spinning angle of the Earth coinciding to the most probable trajectory of a fragment in direction of the Earth.

Visualizing that night has just fallen in Western Africa, the trajectory of the fragment would be precisely the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, close to the tropic of Cancer! Of course, the precision of the point of impact is impossible to determine in the current state of the available data (until the last moment). The remarkable fact is that the conjunction of the slopes (Earth + comet fragment) significantly substantiates my vision. However, we cannot confirm that it is the Atlantic Ocean which will face the fragment supposed to strike us, presently. A thing is certain: The fragment, attracted by terrestrial gravity (represented by a cone in the images below) will fall close to the tropic of Cancer! Its trajectory will pass by the center of the Earth as the laws of the gravitation require it. The direction of the movement of the celestial bodies in the figures below go from right-hand side and to the left, upwards.

The sun is on the far left in the above image: The trajectory of the fragment in the shape of cone crosses the ecliptic plane of the Earth, on the trajectory of the latter, at the time when our planet is there.

The purple line represents the trajectory of the Earth around the sun, which is virtually behind us (on the first image above). The yellow trajectory is that of the collision fragment. One sees, in contrast, the ecliptic plane.

 

One of the obvious aspects is that this cometary trajectory is direct, i.e. almost perpendicular to the surface of the Earth, implying minimal breaking through the atmosphere, and continuing  through the ocean before running up against the ocean bottom. Its energy will be enormous.

 

In comparison to the last images, the concentric wave may not be exclusively generated directly by the impact of the cometary fragment, but by the explosive eruption of underwater volcanoes on the mid-Atlantic dorsal having suffered the shock wave of the cometary fragment. It may be that a long period exists between impact and eruption, even one day or two. It was the case for the tsunami of Sumatra. Seven days before an asteroid hit Indonesia. In addition, the moon will be between Earth and Sun, attracting strongly the magma in the upper areas. This configuration was seen in different major catastrophes like the Sumatra, Iran and San Francisco big earthquakes. Remember that the last eclipse occurred in the Atlantic Ocean MARCH 29, 2006! Just two months before the event, i.e. the same time between the “Missing Earth” crop circle appearance and the SW-3 fragmentation.

The concentric circle causing the tsunami enlarges in a predictable way, but calculate the distance of the huge wave towards the African, American, and European coasts. On the day side, in South America, Central America and North America, the inhabitants will see the wave arriving. But in Africa, as in Europe, it will grow dark. It is even probable that the tsunami will touch the French and British coasts on MAY 26, 2006 a little after midnight. Let us remember that the tsunami of Sumatra took 220,000 victims in 11 nations. Calculations suggest 58 million victims in around fifty countries.

 

In the table below, we can evaluate the power of a comet fragment according to its size

The fragment should produce the minimum of one megaton (that is to say 50 times Hiroshima atomic explosion), producing 10 megatons (500 times Hiroshima) and causing a very great seismic reading at a magnitude between 8 and 9. But the true danger comes from the unique  configuration of the mid-Atlantic dorsal. Indeed, it is the zone of the world where the magma is the closest to the Earth's crust. In other words, any shock wave will produce a compression of the magma, which under the intense pressure, will explode with an enormous outburst. This vertical plunge will involve moisture above the surface of the ocean if the ocean floor relatively close to the ocean surface, producing an explosion similar to a spark-ignition engine which violently pushes back the piston by the expansion of gases.

It is auspicious to note that the Tropic of Cancer (located at 23° Northern), where the comet fragment would likely strike the ocean, is not very far from a particular site: Lost City on the Atlantis fault. In addition to the particularity of this mythical name (Atlantis), and of this unusually auspicious location (Lost City), this point is only 700 meters in depth! A comet fragment striking at the mid-Atlantic dorsal with a sufficient energy could awaken the chain of the underwater volcanoes there. Hardly 600 kilometres separate Lost City from the tropic of Cancer. In other words, it's a very tender zone for an impact.

The mid-Atlantic dorsal is a long line of mountains extending 65,000 kilometres and composed of very many volcanoes. The more closer to surface, the more explosive the eruption that will produce spectacular effects, especially near the Lost City, a site discovered very recently (2001), not very deep (700 m), and which offers a particularly unique geochemical anomaly,  according to data completed by IFREMER at the time of the EXOMAR marine exploration.

 

It is speculative to predict that the comet fragment will fall precisely near the Atlantis fault. Nevertheless, this probability is far from being null and is very likely to occur if the volcanoes are significantly shaken in order to activate them as my vision suggested. There exists more than 300,000 underwater volcanoes on Earth, including one substantial part on this dorsal. The precision of the impact is not imperative to create substantial waves, though extremely likely as several volcanoes will be become active the same day, creating a series of waves.

The figures above and below show the continental shelves bordering the emerged crusts in light colours. They will escalate the waves approaching the coasts.  

A cursory investigation gives rise to a certainty of the most probable scenario. Accordingly, the meteorite fragment considered in the event of MAY 25, 2006 will strike the mid-Atlantic dorsal, but will not be able, in any case, to generate, by impact alone, the giant tsunami in my vision. It remains that it is likely that no one locally will see the fragment striking ground since it will fall into an oceanic desert. The huge wave could be only the product of an explosive eruption of one or more underwater volcanoes, which under the enormous pressure exerted by the shock wave of the fragment will expel a great quantity of lava upwards and creating a rise in ocean water, as well as a correlative depression.

The waves of tsunami are propagated out of deep water with a speed which can exceed 800 km/h. Their wavelength from peak to peak goes from several tens to several hundreds of kilometres and a wave height from a few centimetres to several centimetres, so that they are undetectable on board boats. When they reach shallow depths, the waves are slowed down, which causes the formation of a destroying "wall". A wave of one meter can then become a 16 meter wave.

According to the site Futura-Science, "25 Member States take part in the alarm system to the tsunami (T.W.S. = Tsunami Warning System) in the Pacific, which supervises the seismic and maregraphic stations distributed in the Pacific Ocean in order to evaluate the potentials tsunamigenic of the seisms and to diffuse alarm with the tsunami".

In other words, we do not have ANY MONITORING for the Atlantic Ocean. The times of alarm will be reduced to very little time. As I indicated it in a previous article, only MEASUREMENTS OF PRECAUTION - to move away from the coasts or to go up on the heights - BEFORE the EVENT will allow to save lives.

The last largest tsunami which caused a quantity of casualties and damage throughout the Pacific was generated by a seism located at the broadening of the Chilean coast in 1960. This tsunami caused human and material devastations not only on the coasts of Chile, but also with Hawaii and further still in Japan. We see above the time lines, i.e. the position of the wave according to previous time.

The figure above shows the relation existing between the depth of the oceanic bottom, the speed of the wave, and its size. A wave slows down with the approach to the coasts, but, and that is quite disturbing, grows enormously bigger while arriving on the coastline. That means clearly that only a preventive alarm for MAY 25, 2006 will come from the measurement of a seism whose epicenter will be located on the Atlantic dorsal, EVEN IF THE SEISM IS APPARENTLY WEAK.

What could cause the tsunami could be the eruption itself, and not the wave of the seism. The tragic irony of this is that the International Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, subservient to its Member States, begins its FIRST TEST OF TSUNAMI ALARM... in the Pacific: Pacific Wave 06. This test, meeting the requirements to evaluate the reactivity of those countries, will take place on MAY 16, 2006, the period of the closest passage of comet SW3. The commission reminds us: "It will be clearly indicated that it is a test and not a real alarm".

Alarm will be given by the location at Hawaii. (It is precisely where I live!) In addition, the exact day when I finished this article, a REAL SEISM OCCURRED IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN, with a real tsunami! It is PRUDENT to pay attention to the indicator signs and go ahead with precautions. I believe that fate is made of very “synchronistic” signs.

The images below summarize the probable scenario of the tsunami in the ATLANTIC that I predict.

Although diagrammatic, these figures describe the specificity of the event. To create waves of 200 meters on the coasts, a wave located in the middle of the ocean should be enough. The impact need not be very powerful. Indeed, the shallowness of the Earth's crust will easily transmit the shock wave of the cometary fragment to the magma, which under the combined effect of the shock wave and the displacement of the weak mountainous buttress, will be crushed in its housing. Afterwards, by excessive pressure, a violent magmatic explosion will open the mountain and expunge the lava at very high speeds towards oceanic surface. An enormous wave will be formed.

A research shows, indeed, that the volcanism of a dorsal, particularly in the central rift, is very close to the broad magmatic pockets, where the mantle is partially fused. In other words, a sufficiently severe shock wave would be capable of generating a chain reaction. The explosion of the Mount St. Helens in the USA in 1980 was equivalent to 27,000 atomic bombs. Krakatoa projected 50 million tons of ashes in the atmosphere in 1883. In February 1953, a major eruption of an underwater volcano, accompanied by pyroclastic bursts, a hundred meters high, near the Lopévi islands  in the Pacific was reported. 

The French site 'Futura-sciences'  indicates that " the tsunamis, called sometimes seismic oceanic waves or incorrectly tidal waves are generated mainly by seisms, sometimes by underwater landslides, more rarely by volcanic eruptions and exceptionally by the impact of a large meteorite in the ocean. The underwater volcanic eruptions can produce really impressive waves of tsunami. The great eruption of the Krakatoa volcano in 1883 have generated gigantic waves reaching 40 meters above the sea level, killing out of the thousands of people and devastating many coastal villages".

A second phenomenon will make the situation quite worse. The awakening of the underwater volcanoes will inevitably be accompanied by a great earthquake, perhaps about 8 or 9 on the  Richter scale. This earthquake will inevitably have many counterparts. It will create other seisms in extremely distant areas. Very recently, Russia and South America experienced two great seisms in the magnitude of 7-8 on the Richter scale. But we are likely to experience what is called a "tsunami earthquake," i.e. a seism which produces an abnormally powerful tsunami compared to the magnitude of the seism.

The "tsunami earthquakes" are characterized by ripples from far ocean bottoms, faults of a few meters and smaller fault surfaces in comparison with a traditional seism. They are also slow seisms with a slip along the fault below the underwater bottom slower than at the time of a traditional seism. Two other catastrophic tsunamis originating from a "tsunami earthquake" took place in Java in Indonesia (on June 2, 1994) and in Peru (on February 21, 1996). The Atlantic dorsal very regularly experiences weak earthquakes. One sees on the image below this characteristic pattern.

This next seism in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean will probably be contagious, and will affect the whole of the dorsal, in particular the zone of the Azores. But this seismic activity could also shake the zone of the Canaries, that which researchers of Benfield Hazard Research Center studied carefully. It could cause a very large wave, due to the collapse of a whole side of the Mt. La Palma . The height of the wave created depends on many parameters. It could, in the worst case scenario, reach 600 meters when arriving on the shores.

One clearly sees by the figures above that the giant tsunami would reach the coasts of the American continent in six hours. But in the case of an underwater volcanic eruption, this time is reduced to approximately three to four hours. In my next article I will focus on what it is advisable to do to protect oneself according to the zones and countries.

Do not miss it on the site www.savelivesinmay.com , your life, and that of your family or friends, is concerned.

Also see:

[1] Enfants des Etoiles, Eric Julien, Editions JMG, Avril 2006. English re-editing, Elder Hale

[2] La Science des Extraterrestres, Eric Julien, Editions JMG, Juillet 2005.

[3] http://www.ing.unitn.it/~fontana/

[4] http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0410054 et http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0511157

[5] La Science des Extraterrestres, Eric Julien, Editions JMG, Juillet 2005.

[6] http://www.space.com/php/multimedia/imagedisplay/
img_display.php?pic=060414_comet_map_02.jpg&cap=
Sky+Map%3A+The+positions+of+comet+SW-3+at+one-
week+intervals+as+of+1+a.m.+local+time+from+mid-northern+latitudes

[7] http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/db_shm?sstr=73P

[8] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.361..638W

[9] http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/neo_ca?type=NEO;hmax=
all;tlim=recent_future;dmax=0.1AU;max_rows=200;action=
Display%20Table;show=1&sort=dist_min&sdir=ASC

[10] http://astrosurf.com/macombes/tableau%204-2.htm

[11] http://www.ifremer.fr/

[12] http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/dossier514-2.php

[13] http://www.ggl.ulaval.ca/personnel/bourque/s1/volcans.html

[14] http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/dossier473-8.php

[15] http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/dossier514-3.php

[16] http://www-sdt.univ-brest.fr

[17] http://www.benfieldhrc.org/tsunamis

 

Orbital elements of broken comet In 1995, Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 did something unexpected: it fell apart. For no apparent reason, the comet's nucleus split into at least three "mini-comets" flying single file through space. Astronomers watched with interest, but the view was blurry even through large telescopes. The comet was a hundred and fifty million miles away. We're about to get a much closer look. In May 2006 the fragments are going to fly past Earth closer than any comet has come in almost eighty years. "This is a rare opportunity to watch a comet in its death throes—from very close range," says Don Yeomans, head of NASA's Near Earth Object Program at JPL. There's no danger of a collision. "Goodness, no," says Yeomans. "The closest fragment will be about six million miles away--or twenty-five times farther than the Moon." That's close without actually being scary. The flyby is a big deal. "The Hubble Space Telescope will be watching," says Yeomans. "Also, the giant Arecibo radar in Puerto Rico will 'ping' the fragments to determine their shape and spin." Even backyard astronomers will be able to take pictures as the mini-comets file through the constellations Cygnus and Pegasus on May 12, 13 and 14. Ironically, despite being so close, these comets will not be very bright. The largest fragments are expected to glow like 3rd or 4th magnitude stars, which are only dimly visible to the unaided eye. "Remember," says Yeomans, "these are mini-comets." They're not like the Great Comets Hayutake and Hale-Bopp of 1996 and 1997. Those could be seen with the naked eye from light-polluted cities. The fragments of 73P, on the other hand, are best viewed from the countryside—and don't forget your binoculars. The number of fragments is constantly changing. When the breakup began in 1995 there were only three: A, B and C. Astronomers now count at least eight: big fragments B and C plus smaller fragments G, H, J, L, M and N. "It looks as though some of the fragments are themselves forming their own sub-fragments," says Yeomans, which means the number could multiply further as 73P approaches. No knows how long the "string of pearls" will be when it finally arrives. This is very uncertain; indeed, forecasters consider it unlikely. But an expanding cloud of dust from the 1995 break-up of the comet could brush past Earth in May 2006 producing a display of meteors. "We believe the cloud is expanding too slowly to reach Earth only eleven years after the break-up," said astronomer Paul Wiegert at the University of Western Ontario. "but it all depends on what caused the comet to fly apart—and that we don't know. "The most likely explanation is thermal stress, with the icy nucleus cracking like an ice cube dropped into hot soup: the comet broke apart as it approached the Sun after a long sojourn the frigid outer solar system," he explains. "If this is truly what happened, then the debris cloud should be expanding slowly, and there will be no strong meteor shower." On the other hand, what if "the comet was shattered by a hit from a small interplanetary boulder?" A violent collision could produce faster-moving debris that would reach Earth in 2006. Wiegert expects to see nothing, but he encourages sky watchers to be alert. It wouldn't be the first time a dying comet produced a meteor shower: "One outstanding example is comet Biela, which was seen to split in 1846, and had completely broken apart by 1872," he says. "At least three very intense meteor showers (3000-15000 meteors per hour) were produced by this dying comet in 1872, 1885 and 1892." Assuming a thermal breakup for 73P, Wiegert and colleagues have calculated the most likely trajectory of its dust cloud. Their results: dust should reach Earth in 2022, "producing a minor meteor shower--nothing spectacular. However," he adds, "the ongoing splitting of the comet means new meteoroids are being sent in new directions, so a future strong meteor shower from 73P remains a real possibility." The watch begins on May 12th. From: spaceweather.com

WHAT ABOUT THE MOON?  The Sky is Falling NASA researchers are mining old Apollo seismic data for clues to lunar meteoroid impacts By: Dr. Tony Phillips and Dave Dooling, Science@NASA Published: Apr 29, 2006 at 07:01 The Moon's surface is peppered with impact craters. Up on the Moon, the sky is falling. "Every day, more than a metric ton of meteoroids hits the Moon," says Bill Cooke of the Marshall Space Flight Center's Meteoroid Environment Office. They literally fall out of the sky, in all shapes and sizes, from specks of comet dust to full-blown asteroids, traveling up to a hundred thousand mph. And when they hit, they do not disintegrate harmlessly in the atmosphere as most would on Earth. On the airless Moon, meteoroids hit the ground. Apollo astronauts were never bothered by these projectiles. The Moon has a surface area roughly equal to the continent of Africa. "If you spread the impacts over so much terrain, the probability of being hit is very low," says Cooke. It helped that the astronauts didn't stay long: Adding all Apollo missions together, they were on the lunar surface less than two weeks. "The odds of being hit during such a short time were, again, very low." But what about next time? Following the Vision for Space Exploration, NASA is sending astronauts back to the Moon to stay longer and build bigger bases (read: bigger targets) than Apollo astronauts ever did. The odds of something precious being hit will go up. Should NASA be worried? That's what Cooke and MSFC colleague Anne Diekmann are trying to find out. The truth is, "we really don't know how many meteoroids hit the Moon every day," he says. "Our best estimates come from the 'Standard Meteoroid Model,' which NASA uses to evaluate hazards to the space station and the space shuttle." Problem: The Standard Model is based mainly on Earth-data, e.g., satellite observations of meteoroids hitting Earth’s upper atmosphere and human observations of meteors flitting across the night sky. "The Standard Model may not work well for the Moon." For lunar purposes, "we need more data," says Cooke. Fortunately, there are more data. It comes from Apollo: Clues to how often and how hard the Moon is hit lie in data from four seismometers placed on the Moon by the Apollo 12, 14, 15, and 16 missions during 1969-72. They operated until NASA turned them off in 1977. For years, the seismometers recorded all manner of tremors and jolts, including almost 3000 moonquakes, 1700 meteoroid strikes, and 9 spacecraft deliberately crashed into the Moon. All these data were transmitted to Earth for analysis. Buzz Aldrin deploys a seismometer in the Sea of Tranquillity. "Here's what's interesting," says Cooke. "Of some 12,000 events recorded by the seismometers, less than half have been explained by known phenomena. There are thousands of tremors caused by ... no one knows what." He has a hunch: "Many of them may be meteoroid impacts." "Apollo scientists were very bright," says Cooke, "but they didn't have the benefit of modern computers. We do." Cooke and Diekmann are now loading the old seismic data into machines at the MSFC where they can perform digital calculations at speeds impossible 30 years ago, rapidly trying new algorithms to find previously unrecognized impacts. Critical to the analysis are nine man-made impacts. "NASA deliberately crashed some spacecraft into the Moon while the seismometers were operating," he explains. "They were the empty ascent stages of four lunar modules (Apollo 12, 14, 15 and 17) and the SIV-B stages of five Saturn rockets (Apollo 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17)." Their seismic waveforms tell researchers what an impact should look like. A seismic waveform recorded when Apollo 12's lunar ascent module crashed into the Moon on Nov. 20, 1969. Also, in 1972, a 1,100 kg (2,400 lb) asteroid hit the Moon just north of Mare Nubium, the Sea of Clouds. It was a major impact recorded at all four seismic stations. "When we look at the seismic waveform of that asteroid," says Cooke, "we see that it has the same characteristics as the man-made impacts—a good sign that we know what we’re doing." Cooke and Diekmann will hunt for impacts in the Apollo seismic records using these known waveforms as a reference. In theory, they should be able to pick out tremors from objects as small as 10 centimeters (4 inches), weighing as little as 1 kg (2.2 lb). "Four inches doesn't sound like much, but traveling at cosmic velocities, a four-inch meteoroid can blast a crater as wide as your desk." According to the Standard Model, such meteoroids hit the Moon approximately 400 times a year—more than once a day. (Picture a map of Africa stuck with 400 pushpins.) The Apollo seismic dataset can test that prediction and many others. The analysis is just beginning. "We hope to find many impacts," he says. Regardless of the final numbers, however, their work will have value. "We're developing new algorithms to find meteoroid impacts in seismic data." Eventually, Cooke believes, next-generation seismometers will be placed on the Moon and Mars to monitor quakes and impacts, and when the data start pouring in, "we'll be ready." 29 April 2006 THAT'S COMET SENSE.. NASA rap doom scare By Stephen White SPACE agency NASA have rubbished claims the Earth will be destroyed in less than a month. A former air traffic controller has predicted a comet fragment is heading straight for us. But NASA have rejected Eric Julien's predictions, which he says came to him in visions and were confirmed by messages from aliens. Julien says the world will end on May 25 when a chunk of the comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 ploughs into the Atlantic Ocean. He believes it will cause a gigantic tsunami 200 yards high and the comet will trigger eruptions in underwater volcanoes, causing the sea to boil. Julien, a former air traffic controller in Rheims, France, and senior manager at Paris's Orly airport, put his vision on the internet, where it sparked panic. Message' sparks tsunami panic By Ahmed El Amraoui Thursday 25 May 2006, 13:15 Makka Time, 10:15 GMT Julien claims to have received the warning psychically Related: Factfile: Tsunami impact Experts discuss tsunami alert system A website warning of a tsunami has spread panic in Morocco, despite the government's assertion that the alert was merely rumour - and the dubious nature of its source.  The Ufological Research Centre said on its website last week that a tsunami could hit the Atlantic after a comet passes close to earth on Thursday, May 25. Eric Julien, author of La Science Des Extraterrestres (Science of Aliens), claimed that the impact of a comet fragment would trigger powerful volcanoes in the Atlantic and generate a giant tsunami that would be destructive across the coasts of several countries, including Morocco. Julien, who claimed to have received the information psychically, said that waves up to 200 metres high will reach coastlines of countries bordering the Atlantic. The alert caused fear and panic among Moroccan citizens, though the Moroccan meteorological office dismissed it on Monday as insignificant. The Moroccan news agency MAP quoted Mustafa Janah, the head of the Meteorological Office, as saying the comet would pass earth at a distance of about 10 million kilometres. Citing the US space agency, Nasa, he ruled out any risk of a tsunami in the Atlantic Ocean. Janah also said that "the Ufological Research Centre does not have technical means" to observe this kind of phenomenon. But despite all the assurances, many Moroccan coastal residents have abandoned their homes and moved to higher ground, anxiously awaiting May 25. Memories remain of the tsunami that hit Asia in 2004 and left up to 232,000 people dead or missing across large parts of the continent. Less well known, however, is the track record of Eric Julien who, according to the Morocco Times, claimed in May 2004 to have been abducted by aliens who wanted to teach him to drive UFOs. An article purporting to be Eric Julien's warning is available here - http://exodus2006.com/cometfrags/Eric-Julien-25-MAY.htm - under a banner for the "Exopolitics Institute, political analysis and activism in extraterrestrial affairs". Less sensational information and news about the comet is provided here - http://www.physorg.com/news67263241.html - in an article on PhysOrg.com from May 19.   Tens of Millions of Lives Saved on May 25, 2006 Thanks to the Announcement of a Giant Tsunami for That Date 6/6/2006 6:06:00 AM To: National Desk Contact: Craig Boswell, 832-252-6406 or craig@savelivesinmay.com HOUSTON, June 6 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Eric Julien declares that his alert of a giant tsunami, triggered by volcanic eruptions in the Atlantic Ocean which were to have followed the impact of fragments of comet SW-3, these fragments generated in 1995 by the intervention of a hostile extraterrestrial civilization, brought forth the success of the greatest exopolitical operation in history. The forerunner signs of this possible event were numerous, and were secretly taken into account by various government administrations. A NOAA official issued a warning on CNN May 23rd about a new type of "hurricane" which threatened in short order the entire east coast of the United States, including those areas normally spared by hurricanes. He named this curious phenomenon the "splosh model". On May 25th, members of the U.S. Congress received a memo for an evacuation exercise to be held later that day. Likewise, FEMA -- organization which handles natural disasters - had planned a tsunami alert exercise for May 23rd - 25th. Contrary to the declarations of NASA, fragments of comet SW-3 did indeed strike the Atlantic Ocean, as Julien forecast in his article published last April 11th. Despite the appearance of a series of waves of unprecedented height - up to 80 meters high when the known record was 34 meters - no tsunami struck the Atlantic coastlines. The alert of the former twin-engine jet pilot was actually conditional. From his very first article on the subject (see http://www.savelivesinmay.com ) Julien gave the basic reason for his alert, namely the planned use of nuclear weapons - affecting the planes in which ET's exist - in a possible war against Iran. The link between nuclear weapons and the presence of space civilizations on Earth has been clearly established by the author of "The Science of the Extraterrestrials". Yet on May 25th, 2006, the U.S. government unexpectedly delayed its "Divine Strake" test which was to have played a role in the delivery of pre-emptive strikes against the nuclear installations in Iran. Since May 25th, relations between Iran and the United States have thus miraculously improved. The specter of a third world war has momentarily pulled back, and tens of millions of lives have been spared thanks to this program of information. The threat of a giant tsunami by reportedly hostile extraterrestrials, relayed by the world media, had thus for effect the appeasement of international tensions. A well-meaning extraterrestrial civilization, according to Julien, intervened to minimize the awaited effects of the alert. However, the danger has not yet been set aside. Eric Julien declares: "A catastrophe of an unprecedented size, stemming from so-called natural causes, may occur in the coming days if the media of the entire world does not inform the public immediately of the reality of the presence of extraterrestrials on Earth, in a documented and objective fashion, with an open-mindedness worthy of advanced civilizations in order to raise the public consciousness." http://www.usnewswire.com /© 2006 U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/   Ragnar Martinsen had a close encounter with a meteorite while seated in his outhouse Meteorite in Moss For the first time since 1969 a meteorite has gone through a European roof   The object was found last week after a water leak appeared in a warehouse. "It must have had incredible speed and force, and had made a hole in a steel plate in the roof. People from a firm we hired in to find the reason for the leak found a black stone in the roof construction," Norgesgruppen press contact Per Roskifte told Aftenposten.no. Today Astronomer Knut Jørgen Røed Ødegaard from the Astrophysics Institute and Natural History Museum director Elen Roaldset were present to accept the Norgesgruppen meteorite. "It has been a fantastic meteorite summer. This is a very rare meteorite, a so-called carbon meteorite, and it will get a fine spot amongst our others at the museum," said geologist Roaldset. "This is an exceptional find! This is the first time since 1969 that a meteorite has gone through a roof anywhere in Europe. The meteorite is a so-called carbon - CO-meteorite. Previously only five falls of CO-meteorites have been observed on Earth, and the last one occurred in Russia in 1937," said an enthusiastic Ødegaard. On July 14 a huge fireball flared across the sky in the southeast part of eastern Norway. Witnesses spread across a large area could observe the object while it roared and thundered across from a distance of up to 300 kilometers. The Norgesgruppen meteorite is part of this object that broke up over eastern Norway. Bus driver Ragnar Martinsen was sitting in his cabin outhouse when he heard the noise. "I thought it was an exercise at Rygge Air Station. The bang and rumbling in the air over the cabin was terrible," Martinsen told Aftenposten on July 16. A small, 35-gram piece of stone hit the ground a few meters away from him, an extremely rare sighting of impact. Two days later a new and much larger piece of the meteorite was found in a garden near Moss. This 750-gram chunk hit a plum tree, breaking off three branches before burying itself seven centimeters (3 inches) deep in the lawn. The rock was found after the Johansen family returned from their holiday and tried to mow the lawn. These three finds are the only pieces of the July 14th sighting found so far - and Ødegaard urges people in the area to keep looking for more. Aftenposten's Norwegian reporter Rolf L. Larsen Aftenposten English Web Desk Jonathan Tisdall GSI, PRL get only crumbs from meteorite shower Raheel Dhattiwala [ 9 Aug, 2006 2105hrs ISTTIMES NEWS NETWORK ] AHMEDABAD: The Geological Survey of India (GSI) was shocked to find that most of the meteorite fragments it collected from villagers through state authorities, were fake. Apparently, most of the meteorite fragments that fell in and around Kutch last month are either up for sale or remain undisclosed as curious by local residents and officials. On August 1, the GSI team collected meteorite pieces from Kutch and Saurashtra given to them by the respective authorities. However, after examination of the pieces, only about 80 gm have been found to be genuine meteorite. This, experts say is insufficient for radiation studies. At least 500 gm of meteorite sample is required. Because of the lack of sufficient quantity of material, the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) was sent only 5 gm of sample on Tuesday. "For radiation studies, at least half-a-kilogram of the sample is required. A 5-gm sample is useful only after preliminary studies are done," a senior scientist at PRL said. Confirming that a large part of the material was "pseudo-meteorite", ZG Gevariya, director, GSI Gandhinagar said that only a small part of sample could, therefore, be sent for analysis to GSI, Jaipur and to PRL. "Localites collected the material and it is likely they may have mistaken a large part of it to be meteorite," he said. Of the 2.5 kg material collected in Kutch, 1.5 kg turned out to be fake. However, experts at PRL and GSI suspect that genuine samples were most likely cornered by local residents or government authorities. "People have pocketed most of the samples — localites, to earn money and officials as a souvenir," said a senior geologist at GSI. This, he said, is "nothing new" and happens every time there is a meteorite fall. A member of the Kutch Astronomers' Club told TOI, "One piece was recently offered as sale to a geologist friend of mine in Morbi for Rs 20,000." During the Kendrapara meteorite fall in Orissa in 2003, meteorite pieces weighing a few g were sold to tourists for $100 each. Dr SK Bhattacharya, dean of PRL told TOI that during meteorite falls in remote places, it becomes essential to send search teams to "build confidence among localites and coax them into handing over the pieces to scientists". "This happened during the Dhajala meteorite fall in 1976 also when localites refused to part with samples because they wanted to sell or worship them," he said. But Gevariya said that the department had not come across any reports of people selling meteorite pieces.