Electrons and Mythologies

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com
To: rgrace@rgrace.org
Subject: Rubidium and Quark Energies
Date: 03/05/03

___________________________________

99.83.2 Phi derivative of the meter and Egyptian cubit (Iuliano)

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com
To: rgrace@rgrace.org
Subject: Phi derivative of the meter and Egyptian cubit
Date: 03/05/03

Sir:

The following equations proves the hypothesis that the Egyptian Cubit was the precursor of the modern metric system, clarified mathematically as functions of Natures static metric ..phi... and Natures electrical metric.... the dimensionless fine-structure constant:

Flinders Petrie ...1888 expedition to Egypt ... Egyptian cubit = 20.632 inches

Note:
From: "Larry Brasseur"
To: "Robert Grace"
Date: Fri, July 23, 2004 7:39 pm

On your site update 07/03/04 e-mail conversations: electrons:
Title : Derivative of the meter and the Egyptian Cubic

The Egyptian = 20.632 this is taken from the Imperial measure 1 x 2.54 = 2.54 cm. and is used in most calculations. My Canadian Inch , measure is the egyptian cubic = 21 Canadian inches. If you look on my web page Canadian inch and Egyptian measure 2500 BC. you will see that i have demonstrated that the cubic is binary and if we square 21 it equals 441 remove 1 for zero = 440 for the tone of A indicating the cubic was built to harmonic specifications. Ask your friend to use my 21 instead of 20.632 and i think he will find things will work out better for his calculations. Larry. ----- End Note -----

EC:inches = Egyptian cubit...as noted

phi = 1.6180339875...exact

288 = Hebrew/Leahy" 288 sparks from broken vessels"...exact

meter:inches = 39.370074..inches...exact

c:meter = speed of light =- 299792458 meters-length/seconds-time...exact

.37 = Beta, anomalous exponent for all second-order phase transitions, liquids , metals and gases

GOLDEN SECTION FORMULA...1.6180339875.. = phi..EC = 20.632047706 inches

50000 / (( meter:inches / EC:inches ) ^ 16) = phi

BETA FORMULA.....37 = Beta

c:meter / (( phi / 50000 ) ^ ( 1/16 )) / meter:inches / ( 288 ^ 3 ) = .370000075..

FINE-STRUCTURE CONSTANT.....aem = 1/137.036000986..dimensionless

((( c:meter / EC:inches / ( 288 ^ 3 )) ^ 2 ) / ( 10 ^ ( 2 / Pi ) ) = sqrt aem

EC = 20.6320329438 inches

Since the Cheops Pyramid constructs are of the 2/Pi ratio, the link is obvious.

J.Iuliano

___________________________________

99.83.3 Megalithic Yard and Ancient/Modern Metrology (Iuliano)

Subject: Megalithic Yard and Ancient/Modern Metrology
From: JerryIuliano@aol.com
Date: Tue, March 16, 2004 6:40 pm
To: rgrace@rgrace.org

MP:

Contemplate this formula:

Letting:

Feigenbaum delta constant = 4.669201609...exact

F = 4.6692034868...used in formula

c = speed of light in meters per second = 299792458 m/s...exact

Pi = 3.141592654...exact tangent in radians

...then this equivalency can be shown:

F * Pi * ( 10^4 ) / 18 = c / (( tan F ) ^ ( -1/Pi )) / ( 10^5 )

8149.297429... = 8149.297423...

The derivation of this formula has ancient origins. After many years of studious research of ancient megalithic stone structures , Alexander Thom determined the megalithic yard to be exactly 2.72 feet + or - .0003 feet. The metrology of the megalithic yard expressed in English units is the link to the two formulas.

...using exact value for feigenbaum constant...F = 4.669201609... one has:

F = 18 * ( 2.719999901 ^ 9 ) / Pi / ( 10^4 )

....and:

c = (( tan F ) ^ ( -1/Pi )) * ( 2.719995834 ^ 9 ) * ( 10^5 )

One can also substitute the cosine of inverse fine-structure constant...aem... for ( tan F ) ^ ( -1/Pi): aem = 1/137.036000986...cosine in radians:

cos 1/aem = cos 137.036000986... = .367872975

...so that cosine in radians:

c = ( cos 137.036000986 ) * ( 2.720001866 ^ 9 ) * (10^5 )

....or using the 82944 harmonic:

c = ( 82944 ^ ( 1/Pi )) * ( 2.720001866 ^ 9 ) * (10^3 )

...the radian ...180 / Pi.... is hidden in the formula because of 18:

radian * ( 2.719999901 ^ 9 ) / ( 10^5 ) = Feigenbaum constant..exact

J.Iuliano

___________________________________

99.83.4 Angular Measuring System: Degrees / Radian Link (Iuliano)

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com
To: rgrace@rgrace.org
Subject: Angular Measuring System: Degrees / Radian Link
Date: 03/23/04

MP:

From the unification equation, uniting two angular measuring systems..DEGREES...Sumerian ( 360 )..and RADIAN...1/2 Sumerian divided by Pi..180 / Pi = 57.29577951.. cosine = cos ...radians and COSINE = COS...degrees:

Letting fine-structure constant = 1/137.036004346 = aem

...then it can be demonstrated: i = sqrt( - 1 )

(( cos 137.036004346 ) ^ ( COS 137.036004346 )) / 10 = i ^ i = 1 / sqrt ( e^Pi )

...solving for exponential x using master harmonic 82944 in this form:

82944 ^ x = COS 137.036004346...degrees

...leads to the following reduction:

82944 ^ -.027571485 = COS 137.036004346...degrees

...which decays (natural log e ) to the electron in million electron volts:

(( e ^ ( e ^ ( e ^ -.027571485 ))) / 10 ) / cos 137.036004346 = 1/ ( emev ^ 2 )

...where emev = .5109981152 mev....( 2002 NIST = .510998918 mev )

The master harmonic 82944 is equivalent through the electron form:

((( e ^ ( e ^ ( e ^ -.027571485 ))) * 37 * 17.9995953 ) ^ ( emev ^ ( - 1/Pi )) = 82944

...where emev = exact 2002 NIST value = .510998918... mev

J.Iuliano

___________________________________

99.83.5 Electronic Gravity (Iuliano)

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com
To: rgrace@rgrace.org
Subject: Electronic Gravity
Date: Fri, April 9, 2004 7:39 pm

Quote: Originally Posted by kurious:

To clarify:

The frequency of oscillation of the mass of a proton=frequency of oscillation of charge of proton the frequency of oscillation of mass of electron = frequency of oscillation of charge of electron. The wavelength of photon and graviton emitted always has the ratio of 10^12 for all wavelengths. The electric field is just a strong gravitational field!

MP:....

Is this true concerning the wavelength of photon and graviton emitted always has the ratio 10^12 for all wavelengths?...

J.Iuliano

The release of the new 2002 NIST fundamental physical constants has vindicated a discovery made last year that shows the electron as a function of the gravitational constant.

electron = .510998918 mev....2002 NIST = e mev
gravitational constant = 6.6742 * ( 10 ^ - 11 ) m^3 kg-1 / s^-2....2002 NIST =G(n)

...the gravitational constant has had some experimental trouble as of late as to an accurate derivation of it's value , the new 2002 NIST value matches to 9 decimals of accuracy the electron/gravitational form:

10 ^ (( 10 ^ ( .510998918 ^ 2 )) - 12 ) = 6.674201104 * ( 10 ^ -11 )

...which is:

( 10 ^ ( 10 ^ ( .510998918 ^ 2 )) / ( 10 ^ 12 ) = Gn...note the 10^12 form

"The wavelength of photon and graviton emitted always has the ratio of 10^12 for all wavelengths. The electric field is just a strong gravitational field!".................I don't know who this person is..Kurious...

J.Iuliano

....or to derive the electron out of the gravitational constant:

log (( log 6.6742 * ( 10 ^ - 11 )) + 12 ) = .51099890125

...the gravitational value is exact to the 2002 NIST value while the electron is 99.9999967 % of the 2002 NIST value for the electron

J.Iuliano

electron mass energy equivalent in MeV

Value 0.510 998 918 MeV
Standard uncertainty 0.000 000 044 MeV
Relative standard uncertainty 8.6 x 10-8
Concise form 0.510 998 918(44) MeV

Newtonian constant of gravitation

Value 6.6742 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2
Standard uncertainty 0.0010 x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2
Relative standard uncertainty 1.5 x 10-4
Concise form 6.6742(10) x 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

(Note: Jerry,

The experiment says the electron was found to be a function of the gravitational constant. Let's see if my non-mathematic conclusions say the same. I have concluded that "gravity seems to be space vortexing toward the center of the atom" (Grace). I also found that Scientific American (1980?) mentioned that "electrons are anti-matter", so the question might be rephrased, is the anti-matter electron a function of gravity seeing that anti-matter and gravity have some commonality? There is also the conclusion that there is no such thing as anti-gravity but that it is called a "gravifugal force" (Petrus). I also learned that space is what science calls charge..."space IS the charge" (Bearden) and that the "photon is consciousness" (Arthur Young?) or my opinion is that all "spherical bodies from suns to electrons are what consciousness looks like" (Grace). I also read that the gravitational force could be what we call the strong force (Bert Schreiber), however I have not seen any corroborating experiments to reinforce that lone opinion, however, in my lone opinion, the measurements from weak gravity to the strong force depends upon where one measures the spiraling vortexes of space around the center of the atom. I have also learned that "gravity is what space does" (Grace), that is, space vortexes around a center where it forces matter to collect there. Another conclusion I came to is that "gravity is the incoming information called space, while the EM (electromagnetic) force is the opposite, outgoing radiation from the center of atoms" (Grace), so in this light, electricity is the opposite of gravity, just as anti-matter (the electron and the "charge" called space) might be considered to be the opposite of gravity. That means that gravity goes inward first then electricity radiates outward, so the statement "the electron may be considered as a function of gravity" may be technically correct.

Another conclusion I arrived at was the actual, minimal structure that manifests gravity, which should be Buckminster Fuller's Vector Equilibrium. This is 12 spheres around a 13th centerless-center sphere, which isn't there 1/2 the time. This 12-sphere has curious similarities with your +12, -12 in your equations and 10^12.

However, I do not believe that 10^12 is a ratio but it should be referred to as a "relative power" of 10^12 between electron and gravity, and I would, like everyone else, have to see the complete calculations of both gravity and electricity to agree with the commonality of 10^12. I have neither the mathematical skills nor can I recall any mathematical knowledge I have learned that can affirm or deny the statement, at this time. Possibly, someone else can prove or disprove the statement, mathematically. MP).

___________________________________

99.83.6 FSC/Number pi/Golden Ratio (Iuliano)

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com
To: rgrace@rgrace.org
Subject: FSC/Number pi/Golden Ratio
Date: June 9, 2004

MP:

Source: Connection of Three Major Constants: The FSC, number Pi and Golden Ratio (ru)

You must be referring to this from the website, a very accurate representation of the fine-structure I must admit. However I think it fails occam's razor when compared to this connection of mine concerning theta...1.61803398875...and the fine-structure constant...1/137.036...begin quote....

Interrelation revealed between three major dimensionless constants is shown below: fine structure constant (refer to source doc), number pi (refer to source doc) and gold ratio (refer to source doc). The equation has a kind:

Where: (refer to source doc) = (refer to source doc) = 1,6180339 -
With using of (refer to source doc) = phi = 0,6180339 - The formula will look like:..........

endquote

....this connection discovered 2/23/04...J.I.

1 / phi / 2 = .309016994...

HYPOTHESIS: measurement systems linkage of all angular forms of the angular unit circle can be shown as a function of fine-structure constant:...proof as follows

DEGREE....Sumerian 360 unit circle
COS ( 70.99999397104 + 1 ) = .309017094...

GRADIAN...100 ( Leahy's" thinking now created 100 " )unit circle
COS ( 70.99999397104 + 9 ) = .309017084...

RADIAN....180 / Pi... unit circle
COS ( 70.99999397104 + 0 ) = .309016994....

...these forms mean that Plato's cyclic number...25920... is modular to the gradian form such that fine structure is expressed as a collective unconscious form...37 * 18 = 666:

( 10 ^ (( 70.99999397104 + 1 ) * 360 / 6660 )) / 666 = sqrt 137.036000106

( 288 ^ ( 2 / Pi )) / 100...gradian = cos radians 137.036000986

......cosine in gradians for 25920 is exact to theta:

( 70.99999397104 + 1 ) * 360 = 25919.99783 cos gradians 25920 = .309016994...

J.Iuliano

Sir:

Solving for emev ...electron energy = .510999892mev

Fa = Feigenbaum alpha = 2.502907875....exact
Fd = Feigenbaum delta = 4.669201609...exact:
emev = electron energy = .510999892mev.....actual 2002 NIST = .510998918mev

MASTER EQUATION

(((82944^(1/(emev^-(1/Pi))))*10/emev)^(1/Fa)^(1/Fa)^(1/Fa))+Fa = Fd = 4.669201609...

((( Fd - Fa ) ^ Fa ^ Fa ^ Fa ) * emev / 10 ) ^ ( emev ^ ( -1/Pi )) = 82944

((( Fd - Fa ) ^ Fa ^ Fa ^ Fa ) * emev / 10 ) ^ (( emev ^ ( -1/Pi )) / Pi ) = cos 137.036

(( Fd - Fa ) ^ Fa ^ Fa ^ Fa ) * emev = 9.38274257 * (10^8) ev = proton

(( Fa * Pi ) ^ 2 ) * (( Pi ^ Pi ) - 1 )) / 16 =137.035999688

J.Iuliano

Sir:

The extraordinary abilities of the integers of the collective unconscious ratio...144/37... to perform mathematical functions can be demonstrated by this linkage to phi...1.61803398875...through the unification of the three angular measuring systems, degrees, gradients and radians. Both degrees and gradients can describe the phi function through integers:

DEGREES...360 degrees in unit circle:
cos 72 = 1 / (( sqrt 5 ) + 1 ) = .3090170944...

GRADIENT....100 units in circumference of circle:
cos 25920 = 1 / (( sqrt 5 ) + 1 ) = .3090170944...

RADIANS....180/Pi:
cos 70.999993971 = 1 / (( sqrt 5 ) + 1 ) = -.3090170944...

...the radian form is not an integer...70.999993971... What is this values derivation? Amazingly the 144 and 37 integer forms derive this function:

cos in radians:

cos (( 14.4 - 37 ) * Pi ) = - 1 / (( sqrt 5 ) + 1 ) = -.3090170944...

....144 is the 12th number of the Fibonacci series...1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144...55+89 = 144. Thus 144 and 37 shortcut to the actual value of phi without using the infinite ratios of the Fibonacci series. The sum of inverse quark masses are related to these forms:

( 1/u ) + ( 1/d ) + ( 1/c ) + ( 1/s ) + ( 1/b ) + ( 1/t ) = 354.9999699...

....where 354.9999699 / 113 = Pi

...from Brian Greene's book " THE ELEGANT UNIVERSE " page 9 the quark masses are measured in unit proton masses ( pm )

up quark = u = .0047 pm
down quark = d = .0074 pm.....used in formula .00739856126491...
charm quark = c = 1.6 pm
strange quark = s = .16 pm
bottom quark = b = 5.2 pm
top quark = t = 189 pm

...such that:

cos in radians:

cos ((( 1/u ) + ( 1/d ) + ( 1/c ) + ( 1/s ) + ( 1/b ) + ( 1/t )) / 5 ) = -.3090170944

J.Iuliano

Sir:

An interesting discovery concerning phi...1.61803398875... and the electron mass and energy ratio can be demonstrated as follows:

Letting:

electron energy in million electron volts = emev = .510998918 mev electron mass in grams = egms = 9.109382148 * ( 10 ^ - 28 ) gms

...the conversion of electron mass into energy can be shown as:

egms * ( c ^ 2 ) / ( 10 ^ 9 ) / e (one electron volt) = emev

...where using 2002 NIST values:

egms = 9.109382148 * ( 10 ^ -28 ) grams = electron mass
emev = .510998918 million electron volts = electron energy
c = speed of light in meters/second = 299792458 m/s
.037 pn = radius of hydrogen atom
E = permittivity of space = 8.854187818 * ( 10 ^ -12 )
E = ( 10 ^ 7 ) / 4 / Pi / ( c ^ 2 )
e = elementary charge = one electron volt = 1.602176461 * ( 10 ^ -19 ) C
Pi = 3.141592654...

...using the eleventh dimension of the hydrogen radius....037 ^ 11... one can express both electron mass and electron energy as:

ELECTRON ENERGY...emev:
.08 * ( .037 ^ 11 ) / e / ( E ^ 3 ) / ( Pi ^ 3 ) / ( c ^ 4 ) = .5109989229 mev

ELECTRON MASS...egms:
32 * ( .037 ^ 11 ) / ( E ^ 2 ) / ( Pi ^ 2 ) / ( c ^ 4 ) = 9.109382235 * ( 10 ^ - 28 )gms

...putting into a ratio the two forms...egms / emev...results in:
9.109382235 * ( 10 ^ - 28 ) / .5109989229 = 400 * e * E * Pi

...the 128th root of this ratio equals phi - 1 :
( 400 * e * E * Pi ) ^ ( 1 / 128 ) = .618050519...

...of which phi - 1 = .61803398875...

...a simplification of this form using only the elementary charge and the speed of light:
(( 10 ^ 9 ) * e / ( c ^ 2 )) ^ ( 1 / 128 ) = .618050519...

...using the energy conversion formula...energy = mass * ( c ^ 2 ) ... one can show that the 128th power of ( phi - 1 ) is really a mass in grams in disguise:
1 billion electron volts = ( .618050519 ^ 128 ) * ( c ^ 2 )

...the 128th root is related to the horizon areas (A) of black holes through the entropy formula:
S = A * ( 1/ 4 ) * sqrt h * Gn....such that:

((((( sqrt h ) * Gn ) / 4 ) ^ ( 1/ 128 )) + 2 ) / 10 = .511000634 ^ 2 = emev ^ 2

...where
h = Planck's constant = 6.62606874 * ( 10 ^ - 34 ) J
Gn = gravitational constant = 6.674201104 * ( 10 ^ - 11 )

....black hole entropy formula from Lee Smolin's book " THREE ROADS TO QUANTUM GRAVITY", page 90...

J.Iuliano

Sir

An interesting example of the "collective unconscious" constant...144/37 = 3.891891891... as previously demonstrated by Prof. Leahy's dream number

...2808..( 2808 / 37 = 75.891891891...), Plato's cyclic number...25920...( 25920 / 666 = 38.891891891...), the Hindu Kali-Yuga number ....108...( 108 / .37 = 291.891891891...), John of Patmos trance numbers, 144, 666 , 1260 , 9505..(1260 / 666 = 1.891891...), ( 144 / 37 = 3.891891..) ( 9505 / 37 = 256.891891891...), R. Tomes master harmonic number 3456..(34560 / 666 = 51.891891 etc. all having decimal residues of .891891891....

I ran across this interesting article from the book, " THE NATURE OF MATHEMATICS " by Karl L. Smith , page 170...quoting from the book:

Man who wants to be a number... Minneapolis. At a time when many people complained of losing their identities to a long string of numbers, Michael Herbert Dengler is waging a fight for just that---he wants to be called 1069. Dengler, a teacher turned short order cook, is due in Hennepin County District Court Monday to resume the legal struggle he began four years ago.

The case at one point reached the North Dakota Supreme Court. In rejecting Dengler's plea the court said it was " without precedent in the entire experience of Anglo-American law". So Dengler, 32, who once taught social studies in a Fargo N.D. high school, moved to Minneapolis to renew the fight. And until the matter is settled, he's calling himself 1069, pronounced, " one zero six nine," he says.

Dengler says he wants his name changed for personal and philosophic reasons. He says his protracted court battle has resulted in embarrassment and some practical problems. Minnesota refused to issue a drivers license to 1069. And Dengler had trouble landing a job. One company that makes copying machines told him, "You come in here with a name. We'll give you a number".

Four years ago, Dengler circulated a memo among fellow teachers and administrators in Fargo, informing them that henceforth he was to be known as 1069. In the subsequent uproar, Dengler resigned. Dengler says that to understand fully the reasons he wants to change his name, a person must be on his wavelength. Few are, but friends and former colleagues insist he's sincere.

"He was bright, creative, and intelligent", said William Gulickson, principal at Franklin School in Fargo, where Dengler once taught." He's absolutely sincere about this. This is where he's coming from"......end of article.

1069 is a collective unconscious constant number;
1069 / 37 = 28.891891891...

...which can describe the fine-structure constant from physics...aem = 1 / 137.036

DENGLER NUMBER: 1069
(( 10 ^ ( 1068.999988 / 37 ) - 25 )) / 666 ) ^ - 2 = 1 / 137.036

LEAHY'S DREAM NUMBER: 2808
(( 10 ^ (( 2807.999988 / 37 ) - 72 )) / 666 ) ^ - 2 = 1 / 137.036

PLATO"S CYCLIC NUMBER: 25920
(( 10 ^ ( 2591.999783 / 666 )) / 666 ) ^ - 2 = 1 / 137.036

JOHN OF PATMOS TRANCE NUMBERS: 144, 1260, 9505
(( 10 ^ ( 143.9999879 / 37 )) / 666 ) ^ - 2 = 1 / 137.036
(( 10 ^ (( 1259.999783 / 666 ) + 2 )) / 666 ) ^ - 2 = 1/137.036
(( 10 ^ (( 9504.999988 / 37 ) - 253 )) / 666 ) ^ - 2 = 1/ 137.036

HINDU YUGA NUMBER : 108
(( 10 ^ (( 107.999999 / .37 ) - 288 )) / 666 ) ^ - 2 = 1/137.036

J.Iuliano

___________________________________

99.83.7 Brun's constant, Gravity and Collective Unconscious (Iuliano)

From: Jerryiuliano@aol.com
To: rgrace@rgrace.org
Subject: Brun's constant, Gravity and Collective Unconscious
Date: July 5, 2004

A link between twin prime numbers...Brun's constant , the Omega-2 constant of elliptic curves and the fine-structure constant has been discovered:

Bruns constant = 1.90216058
Omega-2 constant = 1.529954037
fine-structure constant = a(em) = 1/137.036000986..

...the Brun's constant is in the 12th dimension while the Omega-2 constant is in the identity power form...1.529954037 ^ 1.529954037...as follows:

( 1.902160818^12 ) / (1.529954037^1.529954037) / 10000 =sqrt(1/a(em)) = 11.70623765 ....1.902160818 is 99.9999875% of Bruns twin prime constant.

J.Iuliano

ADDENDUM........

Brun's constant exact to light speed , c, with electron mev and proton mev as a correction factor to the collective unconscious ratio...10^(144/37)...with 144 corrected by the electron/proton ratio...144 - ( .510998918 / 938.272029 ) = x

emev = electron million volts =.510998918 mev ...exact to 2002 NIST
pmev = proton million volts = 938.272029 mev....exact to 2002 NIST
c = light speed in meters per second = 299792458 m/s....exact to 2002 NIST

....as demonstrated:

( c / ( 10 ^ ((( 144 - ( emev / pmev )) / 37 ) -1 ))) ^ ( 1/20 )=1.90216057703

The gravitational constant can be attached to the Brun constant because of this exact relationship to light speed...c...

Letting the gravitational constant for Euclidean space newton ...Gn...equal a length expressed as the radius of an arced curve:

Gn * 2 * Pi = 4.193576707 * ( 10 ^ -10 ) meters....this a very tiny, one-dimensional ring or a perfect circle's circumference...2 * Pi * radius equals the circumference of a circle. Divide this ring into one-million equal arc lengths..( because of the metric system one length = one gram ):

Gn * 2 * Pi / ( 10 ^ 6 ) = 4.193526707 * ( 10 ^ -16 ) meters

....one now expands this length by dividing by the smallest quantum in nature, Planck's constant ...h = 6.62606874 * ( 10 ^ - 34 ) Joules...2002 NIST

Gn * 2 * Pi / ( 10 ^ 6 ) / h = 6.32883067 * ( 10 ^ 17 ) meters/Joules

...now comes the strange part, dividing this very long expanded length by an exact rational fractal ( .1 ) of the speed of light unit...c. creates the exact energy in one gram of matter....energy = mass in grams times light speed squared...e = m * ( c ^ 2 ):

Gn * 2 * Pi / ( 10 ^ 6 ) / h / ( c ^ .1 ) = c ^ 2

...Planck mass...Mp.. can be expressed by these root formulas:

Mp =Planck mass = 2.176449594 * ( 10 ^ - 8 ) kilograms
c = ( Mp ^ - 1 ) * ( c ^ .45 ) / ( 10 ^ 3 )
c ^ 1.1 = ( Mp ^ - 2 ) / ( 10 ^ 6 )
c ^ 2 = Gn / (h-bar) / ( c ^ .1 ) / ( 10 ^ 6 )
c ^ 2.1 = Gn / (h-bar) * ( 10 ^ 6 )

...where h-bar = h / 2 / Pi

...from the Brun constant for speed of light ..c...one gets:

Letting ...144 - ( emev / pmev ) = x

Letting Bruns constant = Bc = 1.90216057703 ( Bc ^ 20 ) * ( 10 ^ (( x / 37 ) - 1 )) = c

...transforming to the twin primes summation formula:

Bc = [ (( 1/3 ) ^ 20 ) * ( 10 ^ (( x / 37 ) - 1 )) / c ] + [ (( 1/5 ) ^ 20 ) * ( 10 ^ (( x / 37..]...

...gravitational constant can be expressed as :

Gn = ( c ^ 2.1 ) * ( h-bar ) * ( 10 ^ 6 ) = 6.674205043 * ( 10 ^ - 11 )

...electron energy can be expressed in the double log form:

emev ^ 2 = log (( log ( c ^ 2.1 ) * ( h-bar )) + 18 ) = .261119955 mev

...the electron mev calculates to .510998977mev...where 2002 NIST = .51998918 mev...

...the gravitational constant is exact to 2002 NIST

J.Iuliano

....BRUN'S CONSTANT

Brun's constant is defined to be the sum of the reciprocals of all twin primes:

It's known that the series is convergent and B is finite. Shanks & Wrench and Brent calculated

B = 1.9021605...

assuming the truth of the Hardy–Littlewood conjecture and based on a large dataset of twin primes. Thomas Nicely calculated

B = 1.9021605824...

and needed all twin primes up to 1.5 · 1015 to achieve this level of accuracy. In the process of doing this, Nicely uncovered the Intel Pentium error.

More recently, Nicely has reported his latest estimate

B = 1.9021605820 +/- 0.0000000024

in anticipation of new results to be announced soon.

OMEGA-2 CONSTANT

at this website:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Omega-2Constant.html

In the equianharmonic case of the Weierstrass elliptic function, corresponding to invariants and, the corresponding real half-period is given by ..............

Page 83

Sections List- 99 Electrons and Mythologies Impossible Correspondence Index