Michael,
I've been studying your GPVs for the Giza complex and specifically the Sphinx. I'm troubled by the high GPV of 5400 and the reason it occurs is that you use only the arc-seconds value for the longitude of the Sphinx, obviously because it's so close to the Prime Meridian.
It's value is 00*00'11.77245771"
However, in other places, you have put in 360 to replace 0 deg, and 60 to replace 0' so the multiplication by zero is avoided. If you do this to the Sphinx number, you get its LONG as
360* 60' 11.77245771"
Its GPV is then 254285.0865
Dividing this number by the grid LAT of 63571.27163, you get exactly the integer 4.
Of course, you can get it easier by taking 360*60/5400 = 4
Anyway, I'm used to CI numbers being in the single digits (less than 10)
Tom
99.22.2 My 1993 Article on the Face (TomBuoyed)
Michael,
I've been meaning to send you the link to read an article I wrote about the Face on Mars in 1993 for the Journal of Anthroposophy, but then I visited the Cydonia mailing list and found that on May 30, Tim Edwards had posted my entire article on the Cydonia list. It's message #9623, but if you'd like to read it in much better format go to my old Steiner98 site at this URL:
http://www.steiner98.org/Archives/index-3.html
Tom
99.22.3 A Thought on the Grid LAT of Great Pyramid .. and more .. (Michael Morton)
From Michael,
The Grid LAT of The Great Pyramid is well-down on its North Face. In fact, it seems to me .. to be at about the identical latitude as the "entrance" to the Ascending Passage .. the lower entrance to The Grand Gallery !!!
"Ascension" !! Several researchers, such as Graham Hancock, have said the length of The Grand Gallery is "153" feet. That's a good approximation, and very appropriate, too .. 153 is HALF 306 .. and .. 306 = 144 + 162 ... the Bruce Cathie speed-of-light decimal harmonics in terms of nautical miles per "grid sec" and per sec .. 144000 and 162000. Then, of course, now, whenever I see 144 and 162 together ... I think of the repeating 8s .. 0.888888889 = 144/162. Then .. that's, in turn, a decimal harmonic of my "ASM" Jan.1, 2000 Grid POINT Value for ALDEBARAN .. 8.888888889 .. the "eye" of Taurus the Bull.
I have written (Internet) that my exact "intended" length .. for The Grand Gallery .. is .. 152.8992539 regular feet. Why ? Because .. 480.3471728 / 3.141592654 = 152.8992539 .. where "480.3471728" .. is the "ASM" original Apex Height, including capstone, of The Great Pyramid (Munck, 1992, "The Code") in _regular_feet !!
AND .. because .. 48.66934411 X 3.141592654 = 152.8992539 .. where "48.66934411" .. is the "ASM"_radius_of the Sarsen Circle of Stonehenge !!! In regular feet !!
Watch this ... take the "ASM" Grid POINT Value of Stonehenge ... which is .. 2.433467206 .. and ...
152.8992539 / 2.433467206 = 10 X 6.283185307 ... exactly 10 times (2Pi) !!!!
Now .. are you familiar with the longitude .. from the Giza prime meridian .. of The Great Sphinx ? 11.77245771 arc-sec E. Giza. The Chephren Pyramid longitude is 11.77245771 W.Giza arc-sec !!!
11.77245771 X 152.8992539 = 1800 .. right on the button.
And 1800 = 10 times 180, of course.
And 180 is .. Pi Radians (arc), in our "360" system, where Radian (arc) is equivalent, numerically, to 57.29577951 arc-deg.
57.29577951 X 152.8992539 = 8760.48194 ... my "Tetrahedral Grid LAT". (Morton, 1999, Internet).
The "Tetrahedral Grid LAT" is based_directly_on the (Hoagland) "Tetrahedral Latitude" of .. 19.47122061 (deg) North and South, on rotating planetary bodies .. where "energy-up-wellings" happen.
What I did, was .. I converted the 19.47122061 "ideal" geometric
latitude of the 2 tetahedrons circumscribed in a sphere (model) ..to degrees, minutes, and seconds. Like this ..
19 (deg) X 28 (min) X 16.46707132 (sec) north and south .. = 8760.48194 North and South.
Yes .. I know that the "mathematically-precise-ideal" for the number
of arc-seconds, there .. is .. 16.394196 .. rather than 16.46707132 ..
but .. I propose that the "real-life-quantum" number is "actually" ...
16.46707132, in terms of number of arc-seconds.
Notice how this figure .. the "Tetrahedral Grid LAT" (Morton, 1999, Internet) .. is such an integral part of the STONEHENGE Grid LONG ...
52562.89164 / 8760.48194 = 6. That really impresses me !!
Now, Tom .. watch this ...
(21,600 / 8760.48194) = (Square Root of 60 / 3.141592654) .. = (7.745966692 / 3.141592654).
How about that, Tom !!! The POLAR circumference of Earth, in nautical miles, is ALSO the Grid LAT of STONEHENGE .. and then .. you have the
"Tetrahedral Grid LAT" precisely meshing with it .. to reveal the Pi constant_and_the Square Root of 60 !!!
And 60 .. is our number for time and arc-distance measure !!!
60 stones comprising the ORIGINAL Sarsen Circle of Stonehenge .. 30 uprights and 30 lintels !! 60 X 360 = 21,600.
Tom .. !!! ... watch this ...
Using the "ASM" diameter of the Sarsen Circle of Stonehenge .... in regular feet ...
8760.48194 / 97.33868822 = 90.
The right angle !!!! Hellooooooooo, Arthur Young !!!!
I hope you're smilin', Tom.
-- Michael L.M.
99.22.4 A Thought on the Grid LAT of Great Pyramid .. and more .. (TomBuoyed)
Go, Michael! Yes, I'm smiling and so is Arthur Young, a fellow Pennsylvanian with you in his most recent incarnation.
One question we've got to settle. Is the grid LAT of a very precise spot like the center of Stonehenge or the apex of the Great Pyramid equal to what a topographic map would give you, or is there a discrepancy?
You say the grid LAT of the apex is not on the apex but shifted north about 171 feet. I know you went through Munck's precession calculaiton, but I need to pin down the differences, if any, between what the Munck system calculates and what a surveyor would record, or the GPS satellite would give as the excat LONG & LAT.
Tom
99.22.5 Re: Sphinx GPV revisited (TomBuoyed)
In a message dated 07/04/2001 3:23:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time, TomBuoyed writes:
Subj: Sphinx GPV revisited
To: Milamo, MetPhys, Peace2go
Michael,
I've been studying your GPVs for the Giza complex and specifically the Sphinx. I'm troubled by the high GPV of 5400 and the reason it occurs is that you use only the arc-seconds value for the longitude of the Sphinx, obviously because it's so close to the Prime Meridian.
It's value is 00*00'11.77245771"
However, in other places, you have put in 360 to replace 0 deg, and 60 to replace 0' so the multiplication by zero is avoided. If you do this to the Sphinx number, you get its LONG as
360* 60' 11.77245771"
ITs GPV is then 254285.0865
Dividing this number by the grid LAT of 63571.27163, you get exactly the integer 4.
Of course, you can get it easier by taking 360*60/5400 = 4
Anyway, I'm used to CI numbers being in the single digits (less than 10)
Tom
99.22.6 Re: Sphinx GPV revisited (Michael Morton)
From Michael:
Aha !!! Tom ..
I know what you're having trouble with. I used to be troubled by
that sort of "inconsistency", myself, in the "ASM".
But .. I then realized that there are "always" exceptions to the rule.
That may be a cliche .. but .. it's true in this case .. and in the "ASM",
in various places.
I always come back around to the realization that the "ASM"
is essentially self-evident and self-referential .. and it "knows itself"
better than I do. Of course .. it_makes sense_that The Great Sphinx,
and The Chephren Pyramid .. both having longitudes of 11.77245771,
one E.Giza and the other W.Giza .. would indeed have "high" Grid
POINT Values .. being so close to the Giza prime meridian.
The Chephren Pyramid's Grid POINT Value .. 5764.166073 ...
is exactly "12" times the original (derived) Apex Height of The Great
Pyramid in regular feet. (480.3471728 X 12) = 5764.166073 regular
inches !!! A match !!! It shows the ("British") feet and inches relationship !
And .. "5400" .. is exactly_1/4th_of the POLAR circumference of Earth
in nautical miles ! (The arc-distance on Earth, from either pole to the
equator).
And 5400 is a decimal harmonic of the very important number "54".
Sine of 54 = HALF the Golden Section (Phi) constant = 0.809016994
The thing you discovered, there ... 360 X 60 X 11.77245771 .. = 4 X (Grid LAT of Great Sphinx) ... is ... "DYNAMITE" !!!!!! It's BEAUTIFUL !!!! (-; It's .. CONFIRMATION .. of the truth and of the beauty of this whole thing !!! I really think your "concern" has been wonderfully and thoughtfully anticipated by the designers .. (-;
-- Michael L.M.
99.22.7 Re: My 1993 Article on the Face (TomBuoyed)
From TomBuoyed:
In a message dated 07/04/2001 6:23:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, TomBuoyed writes:
Michael,
I've been meaning to send you the link to read an article I wrote about the Face on Mars in 1993 for the Journal of Anthroposophy, but then I visited the Cydonia mailing list and found that on May 30, Tim Edwards had posted my entire article on the Cydonia list. It's message #9623, but if you'd like to read it in much better format go to my old Steiner98 site at this URL:
http://www.steiner98.org/Archives/index-3.html
Tom
From Michael:
Tom ...
Yes ... very good ... I'll go there .. thanks .. I somehow missed Tim Edwards' post on it. Thanks, again .. will do ..
-- Michael L.M.
© Copyright. Robert Grace. 2001
Date: 07/04/2001 3:23:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: TomBuoyed