Nollert's Constant and Loop Quantum
Gravity
(Black Holes and the Beast 666)
In an article by J. Baez :
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog21/node11.html
. . . are the mathematics for the most striking consequence of loop quantum gravity, that is the area of the singularity surface is the " soul " of the energy black hole ( 666 ) not the volume as in Newtonian gravity. According to Baez the Barrbero-Immirzi parameter ,
4 * ( IN 2 ) , is the key to the quantum areas of spin net-work edging. Baez states , after some mathematics that...." And now for a miracle ! A non-rotating black hole will exhibit damped oscillations when you perturb it momentarily in any way , and there are different vibrational modes called quasi-normal modes, each with its own characteristic frequency and damping. In 1993 Nollert used computer calculations to show that in the limit of large damping, the frequency of these modes approaches a specific number depending only on the mass of the black hole . . . :
. . . plugging this into the previous formula, Hod in 1994 obtained the quantum of the area:
. . . end Baez quote." . . . Later it was shown that the quantum area is indeed , 4* ( IN 3 ).This form is ancient in text as can be demonstrated through the collective unconscious form:
. . . the answer to what the composition of 80 is, can be shown as a complex variable relating to the following constants: unification of product and sum
h = Planck's constant = 6.6260693 * ( 10 ^ - 34 ) J |
. . . the electron - proton mass ratio:
. . . the weak force fermi-coupler is the ratio of the electron-proton masses:
. . . which then rewrites to :
. . . but Gw/Gf can rewrite to:
...which is by substitution for gravity , Gn :
. . . since ( Gn^3) * ( Mp^6 ) = Gf / Gw then the gravity form can be rewritten:
. . . the Beast is the black hole both symbolically and literally (mathematical) As mathematical proof can be shown by the amazing equality that simplifies everything to its minimum. That is, if one states that the black hole form is literally(mathematically)
represented by the symbolic number 666 and the frequency to mass constant that always occurs in black hole singularities: Nollert's constant . . . 04371235
Wfrequency = .04371235 / Mmass |
. . . is attached exponentially ( ^ ) to the black hole singularity as energy, or frequency squared , then the result is a perfect rational integer, which suggests quantum gravitational frequencies of perfect integer modules ....mod 1/80
666 ^ (( Wfrequency*Mmass) ^ 2 ) = 1 + ( 1/ 80 ) |
The collective unconscious exists as a function of this black hole (666) through the electro-magnetic (carnal) rules , guided by the amplitude for matter(electron) to change into energy(photon) . . . aem = fine-structure constant = 1/137.03599911 . . . note the module connection of 1/80 to 144 through one-half the variables of the Beast . . .
144 * 1/ 80 = 1.8 |
. . . or one-half the Beast factor . . . 37 * 144 * 1/80 = 66.6
-----
From the J.Baez article . . .
" And now for the miracle! A nonrotating black hole will exhibit damped oscillations when you perturb it momentarily in any way, and there are different vibrational modes called quasinormal modes, each with its own characteristic frequency and damping. In 1993, Nollert [15] used computer calculations to show that in the limit of large damping, the frequency of these modes approaches a specific number depending only on the mass of the black hole:
|
Plugging this into the previous formula, Hod obtained the quantum of area
|
and noticed that this was extremely close to
On the basis of this, he daringly
concluded that 
Our story now catches up with recent developments. In November 2002, Dreyer
[1] found an ingenious way to reconcile Hod's result with the loop quantum
gravity calculation. The calculation due to Ashtekar et al used a version
of loop quantum gravity where the gauge group is
This is why so many formulas resemble those familiar from the quantum mechanics
of angular momentum, and this is why the smallest nonzero area comes from
a spin network edge labeled by the smallest nonzero spin:
But there is also a version of
loop quantum gravity with gauge group
in which the smallest nonzero
spin is . Dreyer observed out that if we repeat the black hole entropy
calculation using this theory,
we get a quantum of area that matches Hod's result! One can easily check
this by redoing the calculation sketched earlier, replacing
by
. One finds a new value of the
Immirzi parameter:
|
and obtains 
as the new quantum
of area. But ultimately, all that really matters is that when
there are 3 spin states
instead of 2. Thus each quantum of area carries a `trit' of information instead
of a bit, which is why Dreyer obtains
With the appearance of Dreyer's
paper, the suspense became almost unbearable. After all, Hod's observation
relied on numerical calculations, so the very next digit of his number might
fail to match that of .
Luckily, in December 2002, Motl [2] showed that the match is exact! He used an ingenious analysis of Nollert's continued fraction expansion for the asymptotic frequencies of quasinormal modes.
While exciting, these developments raise even more questions than they answer.
Why should loop quantum gravity
be the right theory to use? After all, it seems impossible to couple spin-1/2
particles to this version of the theory. Corichi has sketched a way out of
this problem [16], but much work remains to see whether his proposal is feasible.
Can we turn Hod's argument from a heuristic into something a bit more rigorous?
He cites Bohr's correspondence principle in this form: ``transition frequencies
at large quantum numbers should equal classical oscillation frequencies.''
However, this differs significantly from the idea behind Bohr-Sommerfeld
quantization, and it is also unclear why we should apply it only to the
asymptotic frequencies of highly damped quasinormal modes. Can the mysterious
agreement between loop quantum
gravity and Hod's calculation be extended to rotating black holes? Here a
new paper by Hod makes some interesting progress [17]. Can it be extended
to black holes in higher dimensions? Here Motl's new work with Neitzke gives
some enigmatic clues [17]. Stay tuned for further developments.
J. Iuliano
(Sent via e-mail August 1, 2006)
