Timeline of the Progress Toward a North American Union
Canadian, U.S., and Mexican elites, including CEOS and politicians,
have a plan to create common North American policies and
further
integrate our economies. This plan goes by various names and euphemisms,
such as "deep integration", "NAFTA-plus",
"harmonization", the "Big
Idea", the "Grand Bargain", and the "North American Security and
Prosperity Initiative". Regardless
of which name your prefer, the end
goal of all of these plans is to create a new political and economic
entity that would supercede
the existing countries. Advocates refer to
it as a "North American Community", but it is also known as the North
American Union
(NAU). Theoretically, it would be similar to and
competetive with the European Union (EU). The individual currencies of
each
country would be replaced by a common currency called the "Amero"
and everything from environmental regulations to security
would be
brought in line with a common standard.
Vive le Canada.ca offers the following timeline as a resource to
educate the general public about the progress of the three countries
toward a new North American Union (NAU).
Vive le Canada.ca opposes the creation of the North American Union (NAU)
because we believe it will mean the loss of Canadian
sovereignty and
democracy and hand over more power to giant, unelected corporations. We
also believe that unlike the EU, the
countries joining the NAU are not
roughly equal in size and power and that this means the U.S. will most
certainly be setting policy
for all three countries. Considering the
unpopularity of the Bush administration and its policies in the U.S.,
Canada, and around the
world we believe that erasing the borders between
our countries and adopting U.S. policies at this time is a bad idea and
will create
economic, political and military insecurity in this country.
We hope that raising awareness about the plan to create a North American
Union (NAU) will create opposition and encourage debate in all three
countries, but especially in Canada.
Note: This timeline is a work in progress and will be updated as
events progress. If you notice a correction that needs to be made or
an
event that should be included, please email
susan.thompson@vivelecanada.ca.
Please allow time for updates to be made as they
will be made less
frequently than updates to the main page of the site.
Timeline
- 1921: The Council on Foreign Relations is founded by Edward
Mandell House, who had been the chief advisor of President
Woodrow
Wilson.
- 1973: David Rockefeller asks Zbigniew Brzezinski and a few
others, including from the Brookings Institution, Council on
Foreign
Relations and the Ford Foundation, to put together an organization of
the top political, and business leaders from
around the world. He
calls this group the Trilateral Commission (TC). The first meeting of
the group is held in Tokyo in
October. See:
Trilateral
Commission FAQ
- 1974: Richard Gardner, one of the members of the Trilateral
Commission, publishes an article titled "The Hard Road to
World Order"
which appeared in Foreign Affairs magazine, published by the Council
on Foreign Relations (CFR). In the
article he wrote: "In short, the
'house of world order' would have to be built from the bottom up
rather than from the top down.
It will look like a great 'booming,
buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of
reality, but an end run
around national sovereignty, eroding it piece
by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal
assault."
Gardner advocated treaties and trade agreements as a means
of creating a new economic world order. See:
The Hard Road
to World Order
- November 13, 1979: While officially declaring his candidacy
for U.S. President, Ronald Reagan proposes a “North American
Agreement” which will produce “a North American continent in which the
goods and people of the three countries will cross
boundaries more
freely.”
- January 1981: U.S. President Ronald Reagan proposes a North
American common market.
- September 4, 1984: Conservative Brian Mulroney is elected
Prime Minister of Canada after opposing free trade during the
campaign.
- September 25, 1984: Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney
meets President Reagan in Washington and promises closer
relations
with the US.
- October 9, 1984: The US Congress adopts the Trade and
Tariff Act, an omnibus trade act that notably extends the powers of
the president to concede trade benefits and enter into bilateral free
trade agreements. The Act would be passed on October
30, 1984.
- 1985: A Canadian Royal Commission on the economy chaired by
former Liberal Minister of Finance Donald S. Macdonald
issues a report
to the Government of Canada recommending free trade with the United
States.
- St. Patrick's Day, 1985: Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and
President Ronald Reagan sing "When Irish Eyes Are Smiling"
together to
cap off the "Shamrock Summit", a 24-hour meeting in Quebec City that
opened the door to future free trade talks
between the countries.
Commentator Eric Kierans observed that "The general impression you
get, is that our prime minister
invited his boss home for dinner."
Canadian historian Jack Granatstein said that this "public display of
sucking up to Reagan
may have been the single most demeaning moment in
the entire political history of Canada's relations with the United
States."
- September 26, 1985: Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney
announces that Canada will try to reach a free trade
agreement with
the US.
- December 10, 1985: U.S. President Reagan officially informs
Congress about his intention to negotiate a free trade
agreement with
Canada under the authority of trade promotion. Referred to as fast
track, trade promotion authority is an
accelerated legislative
procedure which obliges the House of Representatives and the Senate to
decide within 90 days
whether or not to establish a trade trade unit.
No amendments are permitted.
- May 1986: Canadian and American negotiators begin to work
out a free trade deal. The Canadian team is led by former
deputy
Minister of Finance Simon Reisman and the American side by Peter O.
Murphy, the former deputy United States
trade representative in
Geneva.
- October 3, 1987: The 20-chapter Canada–United States Free
Trade Agreement (CUSFTA or FTA) is finalized. U.S. trade
representative Clayton Yeutter offers this observation: "We've signed
a stunning new trade pact with Canada. The
Canadians don't understand
what they've signed. In twenty years, they will be sucked into the
U.S. economy."
- November 6, 1987: Signing of a framework agreement between
the US and Mexico.
- January 2, 1988: Prime Minister Mulroney and President
Reagan officially sign the FTA.
- January 1, 1989: The Canada US Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA
or FTA) goes into effect.
- June 10, 1990: Presidents Bush (U.S.) and Salinas (Mexico)
announce that they will begin discussions aimed at liberalizing
trade
between their countries.
- August 21, 1990: Mexican President Salinas officially
proposes to the US president the negotiation of a free trade agreement
between Mexico and the US.
- February 5, 1991: Negotiations between the US and Mexico
aimed at liberalizing trade between the two countries officially
become trilateral at the request of the Canadian government under
Brian Mulroney.
- April 7 to 10, 1991: Cooperation agreements are signed
between Mexico and Canada covering taxation, cultural production
and
exports.
- May 24, 1991: The American Senate endorses the extension of
fast track authority in order to facilitate the negotiation of
free
trade with Mexico.
- June 12, 1991: Start of trade negotiations between Canada,
the US and Mexico.
- April 4, 1992 Signing in Mexico by Canada and Mexico of a
protocol agreement on cooperation projects regarding labour.
- August 12, 1992: Signing of an agreement in principle on
NAFTA.
- September 17, 1992: Creation of a trilateral commission
responsible for examining cooperation in the area of the environment.
- October 7, 1992: Official signing of NAFTA by Michael
Wilson of Canada (minister), American ambassador Carla Hills and
Mexican secretary Jaime Serra Puche, in San Antonio (Texas).
- December 17, 1992: Official signing of NAFTA by Canadian
Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, US president George Bush,
and Mexican
president Carlos Salinas de Gortari, subject to its final approval by
the federal Parliaments of the three countries.
- March 17 and 18, 1993: Start of tripartite discussions in
Washington aimed at reaching subsidiary agreements covering labor
and
the environment.
- September 14, 1993: Official signing of parallel agreements
covering labor and the environment in the capitals of the three
countries.
- 1993: The Liberal Party under Jean Chretien promises to
renegotiate NAFTA in its campaign platform, titled "Creating
Opportunity: the Liberal Plan for Canada" and also known as The Red
Book.
- December 1993: Newly elected Canadian Prime Minister Jean
Chretien signs NAFTA without changes, breaking his promise
to
renegotiate NAFTA. U.S. President Bill Clinton signs NAFTA for the
U.S.
- November 1993: The North American Development Bank (NADB)
and its sister institution, the Border Environment
Cooperation
Commission (BECC), are created under the auspices of the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
to address environmental issues
in the U.S.-Mexico border region. The two institutions initiate
operations under the November
1993 Agreement Between the Government of
the United States of America and the Government of the United Mexican
States
Concerning the Establishment of a Border Environment
Cooperation Commission and a North American Development Bank
(the
“Charter”). See:
About Us
(The North American Development Bank)
- January 1, 1994: NAFTA and the two agreements on labour and
the environment go into effect, replacing CUSFTA.
- November 16, 1994: Canada and Mexico sign a cooperation
agreement regarding the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
- December 1994: The Summit of the Americas is held in Miami.
The three signatories of NAFTA officially invite Chile to
become a
contractual party of the agreement. The Free Trade Area of the
Americas or FTAA is initiated. According to the
official FTAA website,
"the Heads of State and Government of the 34 democracies in the region
agreed to construct a Free
Trade Area of the Americas, or FTAA, in
which barriers to trade and investment will be progressively
eliminated. They
agreed to complete negotiations towards this
agreement by the year 2005 and to achieve substantial progress toward
building
the FTAA by 2000." See:
FTAA
- December 22, 1994: Mexican monetary authorities decide to
let the Peso float. The US and Canada open a US$6 billion line of
credit for Mexico.
- January 3, 1995: Mexican president Ernesto Zedillo presents
an emergency plan.
- January 1995: President Clinton announces an aid plan for
Mexico.
- February 9, 1995: Mickey Kantor, the US Foreign Trade
representative, announces Washington’s intention to include the
provisions of NAFTA regarding labor and the environment in
negotiations with Chile.
- February 21, 1995: Signing in Washington of an agreement
regarding the financial assistance given to Mexico. Mexico in turn
promises to pay Mexican oil export revenue as a guarantee into an
account at the Federal Reserve in New York.
- February 28, 1995: Mexico announces the increase of its
customs duties on a number of imports from countries with which it
does not have a free trade agreement.
- March 9, 1995: President Zedillo presents austerity
measures. The plan envisages a 50% increase in value added taxes, a
10% reduction of government expenditure, a 35% increase in gas prices,
a 20% increase in electricity prices and a 100%
increase in
transportation prices. The minimum wage is increased by 10%. The
private sector can benefit from government
assistance. The inter-bank
rate that is reduced to 74% will be increased to 109% on March 15.
- March 29, 1995: Statistical data on US foreign trade
confirms the sharp increase in Mexican exports to the US.
- April 10, 1995: The US dollar reaches its lowest level in
history on the international market. It depreciated by 50% relative
to
the Japanese yen in only four years.
- June 7, 1995: First meeting of the ministers of Foreign
Trade of Canada (Roy MacLaren), the US (Mickey Kantor), Mexico
(Herminio
Blanco) and Chile (Eduardo Aninat) to start negotiations.
- December 29, 1995: Chile and Canada commit to negotiate a
bilateral free trade agreement.
- June 3, 1996: Chile and Canada start negotiating the
reciprocal opening of markets in Santiago.
- November 18, 1996: Signing in Ottawa of the Canada-Chile
free trade agreement by Jean Chrétien, Prime Minister of Canada
and
Eduardo Frei, President of Chile. The agreement frees 80% of trade
between the two countries. It is the first free trade
agreement signed
between Chile and a member of the G 7.
- July 4, 1997: The Canada-Chile free trade agreement comes
into effect.
- 1997: The US presidency proposes applying NAFTA parity to
Caribbean countries.
- April 17, 1998: Signing in Santiago, Chile of the free
trade agreement between Chile and Mexico by President Ernesto Zedillo
Ponce de León of Mexico, and President Eduardo Frei of Chile.
- August 1, 1999: The Chile-Mexico free trade agreement comes
into effect.
- September, 1999: The Canadian right-wing think tank the
Fraser Institute publishes a paper by Herbert G. Grubel titled
"The
Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American
Monetary Union." In the paper Grubel argues
that a common currency is
not inevitable but it is desirable. See:
The Case for the Amero
- July 2, 2000: Vicente Fox Quesada of the National Action
Party (PAN), is elected president of Mexico, thus ending the reign
of
the Revolutionary Institutional Party (RIP) that had held power for 71
years. Mr. Fox is sworn in on 1 December 2000.
- July 4, 2000: Mexican president Vicente Fox proposes a 20
to 30 year timeline for the creation of a common North American
market. President Fox’s “20/20 vision” as it is commonly called,
includes the following: a customs union, a common external
tariff,
greater coordination of policies, common monetary policies, free flow
of labor, and fiscal transfers for the development
of poor Mexican
regions. With the model of the European Fund in mind, President Fox
suggests that US$10 to 30 billion be
invested in NAFTA to support
underdeveloped regions. The fund could be administered by an
international financial
institution such as the Inter-American
Development Bank.
- November 27, 2000: Trade negotiations resume between the US
and Chile for Chile’s possible entry into NAFTA.
- 2001: Robert Pastor's 2001 book "Toward a North American
Community" is published. The book calls for the creation of a
North
American Union (NAU).
- April 2001: Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien and US
President George W. Bush sign the Declaration of Quebec City
at the
third Summit of the Americas: “This is a ‘commitment to hemispheric
integration." See:
Declaration of Quebec City
- August 30, 2001: The Institute for International Economics
issues a press release advocating that the United States and
Mexico
should use the occasion of the visit of President Vicente Fox of
Mexico on September 4-7 to develop a North
American Community as
advocated by Robert Pastor in his book "Toward a North American
Community."
See:
A Blueprint for a North American Community
- September 11, 2001: A series of coordinated suicide
terrorist attacks upon the United States, predominantly targeting
civilians,
are carried out on Tuesday, September 11, 2001. Two planes
(United Airlines Flight 175 and American Airlines Flight 11) crash
into the World Trade Center in New York City, one plane into each
tower (One and Two). Both towers collapse within two hours.
The pilot
of the third team crashes a plane into the Pentagon in Arlington
County, Virginia. Passengers and members of the flight
crew on the
fourth aircraft attempts to retake control of their plane from the
hijackers; that plane crashes into a field near the
town of Shanksville in rural Somerset County, Pennsylvania. Excluding the 19
hijackers, a confirmed 2,973 people die and
another 24 remain listed
as missing as a result of these attacks. U.S. borders with Canada and
Mexico shut down temporarily
after terrorists attack the World Trade
Centre in New York City. Business leaders in all three countries,
worried that trade
had come to a halt, hatch a plan to create Fortress
North America -- a continental economic and security zone.
- December 2001: New U.S. Ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci
publicly advocates "NAFTA-plus".
See:
The Emergence of a North American Community?
- December 12, 2001: U.S. Governor Tom Ridge and Canadian
Deputy Prime Minister John Manley sign the Smart Border
Declaration
and Associated 30-Point Action Plan to Enhance the Security of Our
Shared Border While Facilitating the
Legitimate Flow of People and
Goods. The Action Plan has four pillars: the secure flow of people,
the secure flow of goods,
secure infrastructure, and information. It
includes shared customs data, a safe third-country agreement,
harmonized
commercial processing, etc.
- February 7, 2002: Robert Pastor gives invited testimony
before the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International
Trade, House of Commons, Government of Canada, Ottawa. See:
INVITED TESTIMONY OF DR. ROBERT A. PASTOR
- April 2002: The Canadian right-wing think tank the C.D.
Howe Institute publishes the first paper in the "Border Papers"
series,
which they have described as "a project on Canada's choices
regarding North American integration." The Border Papers were
published with the financial backing of the Donner Canadian
Foundation. Generally the border papers advocate deep integration
between Canada and the U.S., and the first border paper "Shaping the
Future of the North American Economic Space: A
Framework for Action"
by Wendy Dobson popularized the term "the Big Idea" as one euphemism
for deep integration. To
read the border papers, you can visit the
C.D. Howe Institute website at
www.cdhowe.org. Use the publication search form
(1996 to current,
PDF) and choose "border papers" from the "Serie contains" drop down
menu.
- June 28, 2002: John Manley and Tom Ridge announce progress
on the Smart Border Declaration, including “stepped up
intelligence
cooperation with Canada,” “common standards for using biometric
identifiers, such as fingerprints, facial
recognition, and iris
scanning, to confirm the identify of travelers,” and “a common
approach to screen international air
passengers before they arrive in
either country and identify those who warrant additional security
scrutiny.”
- September 9, 2002: President Bush and Prime Minister
Chrétien meet to discuss progress on the Smart Border Action Plan
and
ask that they be updated regularly on the work being done to harmonize
our common border.
- December 5, 2002: The text of the Safe Third Country
Agreement is signed by officials of Canada and the United States as
part of the Smart Border Action Plan. See the final text here:
Final
Text of the Safe Third Country Agreement Refugee
support groups on
both sides of the Canadian-U.S. border criticize the new agreement
dealing with refugees for stipulating
that refugees must seek asylum
in whichever of the two countries they reach first. Critics say that
preventing individuals who
first set foot in the U.S. from making a
claim in Canada will increase cases of human smuggling, and that other
refugees will
be forced to live without any kind of legal status in
the U.S. See for example:
10 Reasons Why Safe
Third Country is a Bad Deal
- September 11, 2002: The National Post publishes an article
by Alan Gotlieb, the chairman of the Donner Canadian
Foundation and
Canada's ambassador to the United States from 1981 to 1989, titled
"Why not a grand bargain with the
U.S.?" In the article, Gotlieb asks
"Rather than eschewing further integration with the United States,
shouldn't we be
building on NAFTA to create new rules, new tribunals,
new institutions to secure our trade? Wouldn't this 'legal
integration'
be superior to ad hoc responses and largely ineffective
lobbying to prevent harm from Congressional protectionist sorties?
Wouldn't our economic security be enhanced by establishing a single
North American competitive market without anti-
dumping and countervail
rules? Are there not elements of a grand bargain to be struck,
combining North American economic,
defence and security arrangements
within a common perimeter?" See:
Why not a grand bargain with the U.S.?
- September 26, 2002: Canadian citizen Maher Arar is detained
in New York while passing through John F. Kennedy Airport
and held for
12 days by U.S. officials then deported to Syria where he is tortured
and imprisoned for a year. In 2006, a
Canadian government commission
into the affair blames the unfiltered sharing of faulty information
between Canadian and
U.S. security agencies, which is specifically
mandated in the Smart Border Declaration.
- November 1-2, 2002: Robert Pastor presents "A North
American Community. A Modest Proposal To the Trilateral Commission,"
to the North American Regional Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pastor called for implementation of "a series of political
proposals
which would have authority over the sovereignty of the United States,
Canada and Mexico. ... the creation of North
American passports and a
North American Customs and Immigrations, which would have authority
over U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the
Department of Homeland Security. A North American Parliamentary Group
would
oversee the U.S. Congress. A Permanent Court on Trade and
Investment would resolve disputes within NAFTA, exerting final
authority over the judgments of the U.S. Supreme Court. A North
American Commission would 'develop an integrated continental
plan for
transportation and infrastructure.'" See:
A North American Community. A Modest Proposal To the Trilateral
Commission
- December 6, 2002: The White House issues an update on the
progress of the Smart Border Action Plan. See:
U.S. Canada Smart
Border 30 Point Action Plan Update
- December, 2002: US Secretary Colin Powell signs an
agreement between the United States and Canada to establish a new
bi-
national planning group at the North American Aerospace Defense
Command (NORAD) headquarters in Colorado Springs.
The new bi-national
planning group is expected to release a report recommending how the
militaries of U.S. and Canada can
"work together more effectively to
counter land-based and maritime threats." See:
U.S. and
Canada Sign Bi-National
Agreement on Military Planning
- January 2003: The Canadian Council of Chief Executives
headed by Tom D'Aquino (also a member of the trinational Task
Force on
the Future of North America) launches the North American Security and
Prosperity Initiative (NASPI) in January
2003 in response to an
alleged "need for a comprehensive North American strategy integrating
economic and security issues".
NASPI has five main elements, which
include: Reinventing borders, Maximizing regulatory efficiencies,
Negotiation of a
comprehensive resource security pact, Reinvigorating
the North American defence alliance, and Creating a new institutional
framework. See:
North American Security and Prosperity Initiative (PDF).
- April 3, 2003: The CCCE sets up an “Action Group on North
American Security and Prosperity,” which is comprised of 30
CEOs
including former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney’s former chief
of staff, Derek Burney. On April 7, this
action group meets with Tom
Ridge, John Manley, then U.S. ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci and
prominent U.S. neocon
Richard Perle in Washington, D.C. to discuss the
Security and Prosperity Initiative.
- October 21, 2003: Dr. Robert Pastor gives testimony to the
U.S. House of Representatives, International Relations Committee,
Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs on "U.S. Policy toward the
Western Hemisphere:Challenges and Opportunities"
in which he
recommends the formation of a "North American Community."
- January 2004: NAFTA celebrates its tenth anniversary with
controversy, as it is both praised and criticized.
- January/February 2004: The Council on Foreign Relations
publishes Robert Pastor's paper "North America's Second Decade,"
which
advocates further North American integration. Read it at:
North America's Second Decade
- April 16, 2004: The CCCE holds its Spring Members meeting
in Washington, D.C., bringing close to 100 CEOs together to
discuss
North American integration with politicians including John Manley, Condoleeza Rice and Jim Peterson.
- April 2004: The Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE)
publishes a major discussion paper titled "New Frontiers:
Building a
21st Century Canada-United States Partnership in North America." Some
of the paper’s 15 recommendations
expand on the NASPI framework in
areas such as tariff harmonization, rules of origin, trade remedies,
energy strategy, core
defence priorities and the need to strengthen
Canada-United States institutions, including the North American
Aerospace
Defence Command (NORAD). Other recommendations focus on the
process for developing and executing a comprehensive
strategy,
including the need for greater coordination across government
departments, between federal and provincial
governments and between
the public and private sectors. See:
Building a 21st Century Canada-United States Partnership in
North
America
- October 2004: The Canada-Mexico Partnership (CMP) is
launched during the visit of President Vicente Fox to Ottawa.
See:
Canada-Mexico Partnership (CMP)
- November 1, 2004: The Independent Task Force on the Future
of North America is formed. The task force is a trilateral task
force
charged with developing a "roadmap" to promote North American security
and advance the well-being of citizens of all
three countries. The
task force is chaired by former Liberal Deputy Prime Minister John
Manley. It is sponsored by the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in
association with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE) and
the Consejo
Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales.
- December 29, 2004: The Safe Third Country Agreement comes
into force. See:
Safe
Third Country Agreement Comes Into
Force Today
- March 14, 2005: The Independent Task Force on the Future of
North America releases "Creating a North American Community -
Chairmen’s Statement." Three former high-ranking government officials
from Canada, Mexico, and the United States call for a
North American
economic and security community by 2010 to address shared security
threats, challenges to competitiveness,
and interest in broad-based
development across the three countries. Among its key recommendations
are the establishment of
a continental security perimeter, a common
external tariff, a common border pass for all North Americans, a North
American
energy and natural resources strategy, and an annual meeting
where North American leaders can discuss steps towards economic
and
security integration. See:
Creating a North American Community Chairmen’s Statement
- March 14, 2005: Robert Pastor, author of "Toward a North
American Community" and member of the task force on the future of
North America, publishes an article titled "The Paramount Challenge
for North America: Closing the Development Gap,"
sponsored by the
North American Development Bank, which recommends forming a North
American Community as a way to
address economic inequalities due to
NAFTA between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. See:
THE
PARAMOUNT CHALLENGE
FOR NORTH AMERICA: CLOSING THE DEVELOPMENT GAP
(PDF)
- March 23, 2005: The leaders of Canada, the United States
and Mexico sign the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of
North
America at the trilateral summit in Waco, Texas. Canada is signed on
by Prime Minister Paul Martin. See:
www.spp.gov.
- March 24, 2005: The 40 Point Smart Regulation Plan is
launched as part of the SPP agreement. It is a far-reaching plan to
introduce huge changes to Canada's regulatory system in order to
eliminate some regulations and harmonize other regulations
with the
U.S. Reg Alcock, President of the Treasury Board and Minister
responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board, launches
the Government of
Canada's implementation plan for Smart Regulation at a Newsmaker
Breakfast at the National Press Club.
For the original plan and
updates see:
Smart Regulation: Report on Actions and Plans
- March 2005: Agreement to build the Texas NAFTA
Superhighway: “A ‘Comprehensive Development Agreement’ [is] signed
by
the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to build the ‘TTC-35
High Priority Corridor’ parallel to Interstate 35.
The contracting
party involved a limited partnership formed between Cintra Concesiones
de Infraestructuras de Transporte,
S.A., a publically listed company
headquartered in Spain, owned by the Madrid-based Groupo Ferrovial,
and a San Antonio-
based construction company, Zachry Construction
Corp.” Texas Segment of NAFTA Super Highway Nears Construction,
Jerome
R. Corsi, June 2006, www.Humaneventsonline.com The proposed NAFTA
superhighway will be a 10 lane super
highway four football fields wide
that will travel through the heart of the U.S. along Interstate 35,
from the Mexican border
at Laredo, Tex., to the Canadian border north
of Duluth. Minn. The "Trans-Texas Corridor" or TTC will be the first
leg of
the NAFTA superhighway.
- April 2005: U.S. Senate Bill 853 is introduced by Senator
Richard G. Lugar (IN) and six cosponsors. “The North American
Security
Cooperative Act (NASCA) is touted as a bill to protect the American
public from terrorists by creating the North
American Union. The North
American Union consists of three countries, U.S., Canada, and Mexico,
with open borders,
something that is proposed to be in effect by 2010.
Thus, it would ensure the fulfillment of the Security and Prosperity
Partnership of North America.” NASCA Rips America, April 2005,
www.Freemarketnews.com
- May 2005: The Council on Foreign Relations Press publishes
the report of the Independent Task Force on the Future of
North
America, titled "Building a North American Community" (task force
report 53).
See:
Building a North American Community
- June 2005: A follow-up SPP meeting is held in Ottawa,
Canada.
- June 2005: A U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee policy
paper is released: “The CFR did not mention the Central
America Free
Trade Agreement (CAFTA), but it is obvious that it is part of the
scheme. This was made clear by the Senate
Republican Policy Committee
policy paper released in June 2005. It argued that Congress should
pass CAFTA … The Senate
Republican policy paper argued that CAFTA
‘will promote democratic governance.’But there is nothing democratic
about
CAFTA’s many pages of grants of vague authority to foreign
tribunals on which foreign judges can force us to change our
domestic
laws to be ‘no more burdensome than necessary’on foreign trade.” CFR's
Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and
Canada, July 2005, www.Eagleforum.org
- June 9, 2005: CNN's Lou Dobbs, reporting on Dr. Robert
Pastor's congressional testimony as one of the six co-chairmen of
the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Independent Task Force on North
America, began his evening broadcast with this
announcement: "Good
evening, everybody. Tonight, an astonishing proposal to expand our
borders to incorporate Mexico
and Canada and simultaneously further
diminish U.S. sovereignty. Have our political elites gone mad?"
- June 27, 2005: NDP critic for International Trade and
Globalization, Peter Julian (Burnaby-New Westminster) says "The
Liberal minority government is fast tracking Canada into an agenda of
deep integration with the US and Mexico without a
mandate from
Canadians or consultation with Parliament". See
NDP Demands Transparency In
Can/US/Mexico Talks
- July 2005: The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA)
passes in the U.S. House of Representatives by a
217-215 vote.
- October 2005: The inaugural meeting of the North American
Forum, which brings together U.S., Canadian and Mexican
government and
business representatives to discuss issues related to continental
economic and social integration, is held at
a secret location in
Sonoma, California. Invitees to the event, which is chaired jointly by
former U.S. secretary of state George
Shultz, former Mexican finance
minister Pedro Aspe, and former Alberta premier Peter Lougheed,
include John Manley,
Mexican ambassador to the U.S. Carlos de Icaza,
Chevron CEO David O'Reilly, former head of the CIA James Woolsey,
and
a host of U.S. policy advisors to George W. Bush.
- November 2005: Canadian Action Party leader Connie Fogal
publishes an article called "Summary and
Part 1:The Metamorphosis and
Sabotage of Canada by Our Own Government- The North American Union."
See
Summary and Part 1:The Metamorphosis and Sabotage of Canada by Our Own
Government The North American Union
- January 2006: Conservative Stephen Harper is elected Prime
Minister of Canada with a minority government.
- January 10-11, 2006: Government officials and corporate
leaders from Canada, the U.S. and Mexico meet in Louisville,
Kentucky
for a “Public-Private Dialogue” around the SPP. Discussion hits on
“marrying policy issues with business priorities,”
expanding the SPP
“beyond those identified in the initial stages of the process,” and
building a “genuine constituency for North
American integration.” A
North American council on competitiveness, comprised entirely of
corporate leaders, is discussed.
- March 31, 2006: At the Summit of the Americas in Cancun,
Canada (under new Prime Minister Stephen Harper) along with the
U.S.
and Mexico release the Leaders' Joint Statement. The statement
presents six action points to move toward a North
American Union, aka
a North American Community. These action points include: 1)
Establishment of a Trilateral Regulatory
Cooperative Framework 2)
Establishment of the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) 3)
Provision for North
American Emergency Management 4) Provision for
Avian and Human Pandemic Influenza Management 5) Development
of North
American Energy Security 6) Assure Smart, Secure North American
Borders. Read the full statement at:
Leaders' Joint Statement
- April 2006: A draft environmental impact statement on the
proposed first leg of the "NAFTA superhighway", the "Trans-
Texas
Corridor" or TTC, is completed.
- June 2006: Tom Tancredo, R-Colorado. demands superstate
accounting from the Bush administration: “Responding to a
Worldnetdaily.com report, Tom Tancredo is demanding the Bush
administration fully disclose the activities of an office
implementing
a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that apparently could
lead to a North American union, despite
having no authorization from
Congress.” Tancredo Confronts 'Super-State' Effort, June 2006, www.Worldnetdaily.com
- June 15, 2006: U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez
convenes the first meeting of the North American Competitiveness
Council (NACC), the advisory group organized by the Department of
Commerce (DOC) under the auspices of the Security and
Prosperity
Partnership (SPP) and announced by the leaders of Canada, the U.S. and
Mexico on March 31, 2006.
- July 2006: Public hearings on the proposed "NAFTA
superhighway" begin in the U.S.
- July 25, 2006: The article "Meet Robert Pastor, Father of
the North American Union" is published.
See:
Meet Robert
Pastor: Father of the North American Union
- August 15, 2006: The NACC meets in Washington, D.C. to hash
out priority issues for the SPP. The business leaders decide
that the
U.S. secretariat of the NACC will deal with “regulatory convergence,”
the Canadian secretariat, housed by the CCCE,
will deal with “border
facilitation,” and the Mexican secretariat will handle “energy
integration.” There is no media coverage
of this event.
- August 21, 2006: An article titled
North
American Union Threatens U.S. Sovereignty" is posted to
informationliberation.com.
- August 27, 2006: Patrick Wood (U.S.) publishes an article
titled "Toward a North American Union" for The August Review.
See:
Toward a North American Union
- August 28, 2006: A North American United Nations? by
Republican Congressman Ron Paul (Texas) is published.
See:
A North American United Nations?
- August 29, 2006: Patrick Buchanan (U.S.) criticizes a North
American union in his article "The NAFTA super highway."
See:
The NAFTA super highway
- September 12-14, 2006: A secret "North American Forum" on
integration is held at the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel. Elite
participants from Canada, the U.S. and Mexico are present to discuss
“demographic and social dimensions of North Americ
an integration,”
security cooperation and a “North American energy strategy.” It is
ignored by the mainstream media.
See the Vive le Canada.ca article for
the secret agenda and participant list:
Deep Integration Planned at Secret Conference Ignored by the Media
- September 13, 2006: Maclean’s magazine finally covers the
August 15 NACC meeting in an article by Luiza Savage titled
“Meet
NAFTA 2.0.” The Maclean's article on integration notes that according
to Ron Covais, the president of the Americas
for defence giant
Lockheed Martin, a former Pentagon adviser to Dick Cheney, and one of
the architects of North American
integration, the political will to
make deep integration of the continent happen will last only for "less
than two years".
According to the article, to make sure that the
establishment of a North American Union will take place in that time,
"The executives have boiled their priorities down to three: the
Canadian CEOs are focusing on 'border crossing facilitation,'
the
Americans have taken on 'regulatory convergence,' and the Mexicans are
looking at 'energy integration' in everything
from electrical grids to
the locating of liquid natural gas terminals. They plan to present
recommendations to the ministers in
October. This is how the future of
North America now promises to be written: not in a sweeping trade
agreement on which
elections will turn, but by the accretion of
hundreds of incremental changes implemented by executive agencies,
bureaucracies
and regulators. 'We've decided not to recommend any
things that would require legislative changes,' says Covais. 'Because
we won't get anywhere.' " See:
Meet NAFTA 2.0
- September 28, 2006: Stockwell Day says there was "nothing
secret" about the forum on integration held in Banff.
See:
Nothing secret about Banff forum, says Stockwell Day
- February 23, 2007: SPP Ministerial meeting is held in
Ottawa, Canada, and attended by Canadian Ministry of Industry
Maxime
Bernier, Mexican Secretary of the Economy Eduardo Sojo, U.S. Secretary
of State Condoleezza Rice, Canadian
Minister of Foreign Affairs Peter
MacKay, Mexican Secretary of External Affairs Patricia Espinosa Castellano,
U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff,
Canadian Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day, and Mexican
Secretary of the Interior Francisco Javier Ramirez Acuna. Officials
also consult with corporate CEOs, members of the
North American
Competitiveness Council (NACC). The Council's 10 Canadian members were
appointed last summer by
Prime Minister Harper and given privileged
access to government Ministers to push their corporate vision for
continental
"integration". In a statement, the ministers responsible
for the SPP noted that they “recognize the importance of focusing
on
initiatives that will further competitiveness and quality of life in
North America, and will continue to work together to
successfully meet
the security and prosperity challenges of the 21st century.” The
agenda of the meeting is challenged by
an alliance of citizen's groups
in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. See:
Tri-national ministerial
meeting to star Rice and
Chertoff,
Trade, Competitiveness, and Security Issues at the Forefront of North
American Ministerial Meeting and
United States Strengthens Ties with Canada, Mexico: Neighbors coming
together through Security and Prosperity
Partnership, By David McKeeby
- March 31-April 1, 2007: The Council of Canadians, the
Canadian Labour Congress and other progressive organizations hold
a
teach-in in ottawa called Integrate This! Challenging the Security and
Prosperity Partnership. See
Integrate This!
- April 26-27, 2007: A closed-door roundtable meeting on the
Future of North American Environment 2025 is held in Calgary on
April
26 and 27 2007. This is the final concluding roundtable initiated by
three think tanks to address issues around where the
Security and
Prosperity Partnership is going. The report is to be sent to the three
national governments, both for feedback and
comments, at the end of
June 2007. NDP MP Peter Julian crashes the meeting, and due to his
presence there the Harper
government pulls its delegation. Organisers
tell Julian that the federal government delegation was basically
stopped at the
Airport from attending the final roundtable meetings on
the subject.
- April-May 2007: Thanks to the efforts of NDP International
Trade Critic Peter Julian (Burnaby - New Westminster), the
Standing
Committee on International Trade holds the first ever hearings on the
so-called "Security and Prosperity Partnership"
(SPP) of North
America. The televised hearings are held on April 26, May 1st and 3rd,
2007 in Ottawa. To read the transcripts
of the hearings, see
Info on SPP Hearings from NDP MP Peter Julian and
Update on Hearings at Trade Committee re SPP
from NDP MP Peter Julian
Contributed by: sthompson
- Thursday, May 10, 2007: Amid heated charges of a coverup,
Tory MPs abruptly shut down parliamentary hearings on the
SPP, a
controversial plan to further integrate Canada and the U.S. They shut
the hearings down in reaction to the testimony
of University of
Alberta professor and director of the Parkland Institute Gordon Laxer,
who testifies that Canadians will be left
"to freeze in the dark" if
the government forges ahead with plans to integrate energy supplies
across North America. In
response, the chair of the committee,
Conservative MP Leon Benoit (Vegreville-Wainwright), rules his
testimony out of order
for being "irrelevant" to the hearings. When
opposition MPs on the committee vote down his ruling, Benoit blurts
out that he
is adjourning the meeting, and proceeds to storm out with
two other Conservative MPs. [Some of this information was
paraphrased
from the article in the Ottawa Citizen. For full article see "Tory
chair storms out of SPP hearing", Friday
May 11, the Ottawa Citizen,
Tory chair storms out of SPP hearing.] Later, Gordon Laxer's
presentation to the trade
committee on SPP is officially voted in as
evidence by the committee. The full testimony is printed in both the
Calgary
Herald and the Edmonton Journal on May 16, 2007. You can read
it on Vive at:
Latest News from Parkland Institute:
Laxer Creates Stir on the Hill;
or see the Edmonton Journal article,
Canada-first energy strategy needed.
- UPCOMING June 26-29, or possibly August 2007: Canadian
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, George W. Bush, and
Mexican President
Felipe Calderon will meet for the planned third summit of the Security
and Prosperity Partnership.
We'll update details on this as we get
them.
Sources aside from articles provided within the timeline:
Vive le Canada.ca, FAQ,
Sovereignty vs Deep Integration
North American Forum on Integration,
NAFTA Timeline
North American Union/Testimony, Publications and Reports, Sourcewatch, a
project of the Center for Media and Democracy,
North American Union/Testimony, Publications and Reports
Free Market News Network Corp,
N. AM. UNION TIMELINE
SPP Timeline,
SPP: What You Don't Know CAN Hurt You!
Wikipedia, various entries,
Wikipedia.org
Also, wherever possible links to the full text of various agreements
have been provided.
We also recommend the Council of Canadians' deep integration
timeline:
DI timeline (PDF)
Last Updated Wednesday, May 16 2007 @ 02:52 PM MDT
|
of the 49th a more vocal opposition will emerge, however, now that construction of the NAFTA Super Highway -a 10-lane
monstrosity linking Monterrey to Winnipeg- has begun on the TCC or 'Trans-Texas Corridor', I suspect that American nationalists
will be the first to protest.
Here's a map: http://www.nascocorridor.com/
In Canada, NAU was originally supported by the Liberals (John Manley) and is now being fostered by the Conservatives (Stockwell
Day). Recently, officials from all three countries (Mexico/Canada/US) met in Banff this past September albeit in secrecy. Why?
Because there's A LOT MORE on the table than just transportation or trade issues. Allow me to illuminate.
For those of you who 'missed it', NORAD no longer exists.
Control of what was once sovereign Canadian airspace under a bi-national and 'shared' command was effectively dissolved in
October 02' by the creation of USNORTHCOM. Under this new command, Cheyenne mountain is being mothballed and operations
of what used to be NORAD have been transferred to what is refered to as N2C2.
Asisde from North American aerospace, USNORTHCOM also fully intends to take control of all North American sea lanes and
approaches out to 500 miles which may seem a little confusing for a command structure based in Colorado, however, once one
notices that the commander of USNORTHCOM is an Admiral, the strategy makes sense.
Ahh but what about the land component you ask?
Meet America's newest command - USARNORTH: http://www.arnorth.army.mil established to 'protect the American people and
their way of life'.
And where might we find USARNORTH? How about Ft. Sam Houston where low and behold... construction of the NAFTA
Superhighway has begun.
~~~~
May/June 2007
Is a superhighway shaping the economic and political future of Canada? That’s what Richard D. Vogel argues in the cover story
of the current issue of Canadian Dimension. We also celebrate May Day with articles on “women’s” work (by Bernadette
Wagner) and human trafficking (by Amardeep Kaur Gill) in our second-annual feature, Labour Activists who are Changing the
World, and we get the dirt on Canadian mining companies operating in Guatemala and Honduras.
~~~
Bush's unpublicized project that's going to make a lot of people really angry.
center of the country, four football fields wide. Isn't that 400 yards? Equals 1200 feet? Which is almost a quarter of a mile
or half a kilometer?
You can open your eyes now and see where the highway goes.
It's a little like a tree with its roots in Mexico, two major roots running north and northeast to Laredo. Once past Laredo and
into south Texas, it charges straight north, 400 yards wide, to Kansas City. There it splits, one branch running through Chicago
and Detroit to Toronto and Montreal, the other branch running northwest through Omaha and Fargo to Winnipeg and then to
the west coast of Canada.
It's no bike path. It's new NAFTA highway.
You think I'm kidding? The project has been on the hotplate here in Texas for a couple of years with protesters trying to stop it.
They can't.
You haven't heard about it? Maybe that's because the plan includes a lot of politically very unpopular features. For starters, it will
have a huge and very negative environmental impact, starting with the farm and ranchland seized in order to have 400 yards of
asphalt and pollution, not even taking into account the service industries growing up along the length of it. Then there's the matter
of bypassing union labor. Oh, and the open border it requires at both ends -- that should send some Minute Men into convulsions.
And no "robust debate." No way.
For more on this quiet blockbuster of a project yet to hit the mainstream media,
you'll need to check out the article at Human Events, a conservative journal.
Posted on June 17, 2006
~~~~
YouTube - Winnipeg - North American Union Trade Hub
Winnipeg - North American Union Trade Hub .... NAFTA ...Watch video - 2 min 18 sec -
www.youtube.com/watch?v=vM1yDHt3TT4
The Mother of All Bureaucracies-NASCO
By Nancy Thomson
It isn't possible to have a Mother of All Highways unless there is an equivalent organization to back it up. Voila, we have the
North America's Superhighway Coalition, Inc. (NASCO)
In the past it was our American companies going international overseas, the UN, IMF (International Monetary Fund) and the
World Bank that were frittering away our money for use in the far reaches of the globe. With the introduction of NASCO the US
has become its own global target. We are internationalizing ourselves!
According to their own pubic relation's release, NASCO is a multi-state, international non-profit corporation. Their board of
directors successfully lobbied Congress to create and provide funds for the International Trade Corridors "(ITC) This included
$7oo million in Contract Authority under the new federal highway bill... the Transportation Equity Act (TEA 21) Again lobbying
Congress successfully, NASCO was able to get almost $350 million for special projects along the Corridor. Highways I-36 and
I-29 were named as "high priority corridors" under the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 and (TEA-21)"
Did Mexico and Canada also lobby their governments for money to build this colossal rite of passage for imports?
Many of our national highways will start charging tolls and we will have to pay to travel on our own roads. These additional fees
will be added to the International Highway coffers along with federal, state, and "private"(Chinese?) funding. The manufacturing
of many high line products have left US shores and transplanted themselves in slave labor China. We now import goods from the
Chinese that were originally made in the USA. This accounts for the $60 billion dollar trade deficit with this communist country.
Importing to us is the most important way to fund their military and this NAFTA trade Corridor will increase their access
exponentially.
Why shouldn't the Chinese donate to a cause that increases their income, allots some control of the project, and furthers the
US economic downslide?
The membership of this trade organization is a conglomeration of US cities, counties, and states, Canadian cities and provinces,
many Chamber's of Commerce, and private sector businesses such as the Ambassador Bridge at the international border crossing
of Detroit and Windsor. Coalition leadership has passed to Oklahoma State Majority Whip, Keith Leftwich, and a Democrat who
wrote the resolution authorizing his states' membership in NASCO.
Leftwich hopes to add new funding for trade corridors, and increased research for technology in dealing with increased traffic
demands. He also wants creation of International Trade Processing Centers (ITPCS) to manage trade flow, and a "clean corridor"
to reduce congestion. Links to local, state, and provincial economies along the corridor will be encouraged.
The three NAFTA nations mid-continent corridor will be intermodal trade, and the goal is to facilitate movement of people (illegal
aliens?) and goods. NASCO will increase the "public private partnerships"(this means international control of everything) They
will "explore strategic alliances with other corridor coalitions."
This veiled language doesn't fool anyone who knows the government's trade agenda of incorporating all of this hemisphere and
Africa into NAFTA. These added areas would become the "strategic partners mentioned for other coalitions.
Buried among all the hype about The International Trade Corridor (ITC) is language that indicates this system will function is a
variety of regulatory ways.
environmental and that taxes, fees , and tolls are being fairly assessed and collected.
Getting local people and officials in the Corridor areas all involved is key to implementing the program. Locals have all sorts of
traffic problems they want solved by using federal funds. .A good example of this is Austin Texas and the surrounding territory.
Traffic congestion abounds on the I-35, and the cost of alleviating the situation by building a bypass would cost $1 billion dollars.
NAFTA supporters have always considered I-35 as the preliminary super highway for goods from Mexico coming into the US.
This of course, is the explanation for the traffic overflow.
A Texas delegation wants Congress to create "an international trade corridor" and make Texas eligible for hundreds of millions
of dollars. This internationalizing transportation is a new money source! Texas gets the money and the internationalists working
in conjunction with Washington have a hook in another state's transportation structure.
A state study, which would officially accept NASCO'S own 1995 version of the Superhighway and this, would unite state and
Coalition projects. Public meetings will be held in major Texas cities this March.
In April, 1994, Denton County Judge Jeff Moseley founded the eight - state coalition.
His coalition employs three Washington lobbyists to pressure Congress on behalf of the Corridor cause. How could anyone
question an enterprise in which a judge becomes a leader?
The arrogance of officials involved in spending of taxpayer's money is nowhere more evident than in the statements of Jim
Francis, the coalition's strategic advisor. NASCO'S study identified $5.5 billion for 1-35 long term, He stated that the Interstate
29 interlocking road that heads north to Winnipeg Canada could have major improvements by spending" several hundred million
dollars" in the next five years.
But , Francis said," But it is more then just getting money for 1-35 It's getting Congress to recognize funds for trade corridors
over and beyond the various state funds."
Major heartland points represented in the NAFTA trade route are Winnipeg Canada, Iowa. Kansas
City Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, and Detroit/ Windsor. Officials in all these areas are looking forward to globalization increasing
their income in the marketplace. Our industries are disappearing so there is less and less to export. We have a $ 3 hundred billion
dollar trade deficit even without this trade corridor. How short sighted these Americans in their push to establish US subsidized
markets for foreign countries. They are so easily led by false crusaders of globalism.
http://isburg.net/essays/MotherOfAllBureaucracies.html
~~~~~
Quebec’s minority government will seek a free-trade agreement with Ontario as part of Premier
Jean Charest’s attempt to revive the province’s economy and regain popular support. Mr. Charest
also reiterated his proposal to seek a free-trade deal with the European Union.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Globe and Mail
Quebec seeks free-trade deals with Ontario, EU
RHÉAL SÉGUIN
May 10, 2007
QUEBEC — Quebec’s minority government will seek a free-trade agreement with Ontario as part
of Premier Jean Charest’s attempt to revive the province’s economy and regain popular support
after March’s disappointing election result for his Liberal government.
In the inaugural speech outlining the priorities of the province’s first minority government in more
than a century, Mr. Charest also reiterated his proposal to seek a free-trade deal with the
European Union.
"We are in the process of building an interconnection with Ontario in order to export more
electricity to our neighbours," the Premier said. "We will draw inspiration from this connection to
lift the barriers that still hamper trade between us. We will propose that Ontario enter into a
free-trade agreement with Quebec."
The deal would be similar to the one signed between Alberta and British Columbia that
eliminated trade barriers between the two provinces, a Charest aide said.
At the same time, Mr. Charest hopes to persuade businesses and other political leaders to rally
"behind our proposal for a new economic partnership with the European Union."
He is pushing economic development as the focus of his new mandate in an attempt
to overcome voter dissatisfaction after the Liberals’ worst electoral performance to date. In
the March 26 election, the party got just 33 per cent of the vote and won 48 of the 125 ridings.
The setback was in part due to the Liberals’ failure to meet a 2003 campaign promise to cut
taxes by $1-billion a year.
In his inaugural speech yesterday, Mr. Charest warned that he will defy the opposition parties’
objections to his latest promise to cut taxes.
The Liberals plan to take advantage of the upheaval in the Parti Québécois, sparked by the
sudden resignation on Tuesday of leader André Boisclair, to push through a promise to use
new federal funds to cut taxes by $950-million.
Yesterday, newly elected PQ interim leader François Gendron said that a tax cut is not a good
idea, but the PQ may have no choice but to support it.
"What is certain is that voters do not want to go into another election this June," he said.
Mr. Charest is gambling that the PQ will eventually vote in favour of the tax cut to forestall
another election.
Responding to what he believes is voter demand for a more right-wing agenda, Mr. Charest
also promised to open the door to more private clinics and lift the freeze on university tuition.
The speech contained few bold initiatives, prompting Official Opposition Leader Mario Dumont
to say that the Liberals adopted many of the proposals of his Action Démocratique du Québec.
"It seems Mr. Charest stole ingredients from the ADQ buffet and it shows he has no clear recipe
in his head, no clear vision for Quebec," Mr. Dumont said.
Mr. Charest’s minority government also promised to respond to voter concerns about the
"reasonable accommodation" of certain religious groups.
Voter backlash on this issue cost the Liberals votes and boosted support for the ADQ, which
denounced the demands of some minorities.
Mr. Charest emphasized the need to strike a balance between accommodating religious
minorities and protecting Quebec’s identity and values.
"To be born in Quebec is a blessing, to immigrate to Quebec is a privilege. Integrating
immigrants is a responsibility. It is a reciprocal gesture," Mr. Charest said in arguing that
immigrants need to embrace Quebec values, such as the equality between men and women.
One of the more popular initiatives announced yesterday is a bill to limit access to semi-automatic
guns. Dubbed the Anastasia bill in memory of Anastasia De Sousa, who was killed in a shooting
rampage at Montreal’s Dawson College last September, the bill could require gun owners to
store semi-automatic guns in special facilities at designated firing ranges.
My feeling is that if Quebec wants full integration with the EU then it's probably better if they
are a country quite removed from Canada if at all possible. I also have my doubts if there is
such a thing as a 'free' trade deal with the European Union. As others have said though it's
quite possible the EU don't really give a flying f--k about having another free trade deal with
Canada or other parts of Canada.
It occurred to me that this is just more trolling-agit prop bullshit put out by the anarchist-punk
types so they can snicker up their sleeves at us just like that bullshit story about the NAFTA
superhighway from Mexico over the US to Winnipeg. Fcuken brilliant assholes. However the
fact that a moron like Jean Charest in control of a whole province of Canada thinks this is a
good idea is cause for alarm. Does this assclown know anything?
http://unitednorthamerica.org/post-80863.html
Posted: July 29, 2007
5:00 p.m. Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
Vice President Cheney
Despite evidence to the contrary, Vice President Dick Cheney says there is no "secret plan" to create a continent-crossing superhighway to help facilitate a merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada. "The administration is not engaged in a secret plan to create a 'NAFTA super highway,'" asserts Cheney in a recent letter to a constituent, according to a copy of the message obtained by WND. The vice president's letter quotes an Aug. 21 statement from the U.S. Department of Transportation that, "The concept of a super highway has been around since the early 1990s, usually in the form of a claim that the U.S. Department of Transportation is going to designate such a highway."
DOT then refutes the claim, stating, "The Department of Transportation has never had the statutory authority to designate a NAFTA super highway and has never sought such authority." The DOT statement then retracts the absolute nature of that statement, qualifying that, "The Department of Transportation will continue to cooperate with the State transportation departments in the I-35 corridor as they upgrade this vital interstate highway to meet 21st century needs.
See: http://www.greatdreams.com/bridges/bridges.htm
for the I-35W bridge collapse on 7-31-07 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
President George Bush states that he will help get the bridge rebuilt quickly. The cost will be about $500,000,000.
However, these efforts are the routine activities of a Department that cooperates with all the state transportation departments to improve the Nation's intermodal transportation network." The DOT statement cited by the vice president seems to model the denial recently fashioned by the North America's SuperCorridor Coalition, Inc., or NASCO, on its website. There NASCO states, "There a no plans to build a new NAFTA Superhighway ¨C it exists today as I-35." The coalition continues to distinguish its support for a North American "SuperCorridor" from a "NAFTA Superhighway," asserting that a "SuperCorridor is not 'Super-sized."
The website then claims NASCO uses the term "SuperCorridor" to demonstrate "we are more than just a highway coalition." In a July 21, 2006, internal e-mail obtained by WND under a Missouri Sunshine Law request, Tiffany Melvin, executive director of NASCO, cautions "NASCO friends and members" that, "We have to stay away from 'SuperCorridor' because it is a very bad, hot button right now." As WND previously reported, Jeffrey Shane, undersecretary of transportation for policy at the U.S. Department of Transportation got into a spirited exchange in January with congressmen after he asserted to a House
subcommittee that NAFTA Superhighways were an "urban legend." In response to questioning by Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, before the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Shane asserted he was "not familiar with any plan at all, related to NAFTA or cross-border traffic." Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., then questioned aloud whether Shane was just "gaming semantics" when responding to Poe's question.
In June 2006, when first writing about NASCO, WND displayed the original homepage of NASCO, which used to open with a map highlighting the I-35 corridor from Mexico to Canada, arguing the trade group and its members were actively promoting a NAFTA superhighway.
NASCO's original map highlighted the I-35 corridor from Mexico to Canada (See top of page)
Click to join catapultthepropaganda
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda/join
Click to join openmindopencodenews
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join
In what appears to be the third major revamping of the NASCO website since WND first began writing articles about NASCO, the Dallas-based trade group carefully removes identifying NASCO with the words behind the acronym, "North America's SuperCorridor Coalition, Inc.," which the original NASCO website once proudly
proclaimed. The current NASCO homepage displays a photo montage of intermodal highway scenes, presumably taken along I-35, but without any map displaying a continental I-35 super corridor linking Mexico and Canada.
NASCO currently relegates the continental I-35 map to an internal webpage that describes the North American Inland Ports Network as a "working group" within NASCO that supports inland member cities who have designated themselves as "inland ports," seeking to warehouse container traffic originating in Mexican
ports on the Pacific such as Manzanillo and Lázaro Cárdenas. The beige and blue continental I-35 map now
positioned on an internal page of the NASCO website was originally used as the second NASCO website, in make-over of the original NASCO blue and yellow continental I-35 map that made the continental nature of the I-35 appear graphically more pronounced. WND has also previously reported that in a speech to NASCO on April 30, 2004, Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta referred to Interstate Highways 35, 29 and 94 ¨C the core highways supported by NASCO as a prime "North American Super Corridor" ¨C Mineta commented to NASCO that the trade group "recognized that the success of the NAFTA relationship depends on mobility ¨C on the movement of people, of products, and of capital across borders." WND has also reported Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., a GOP presidential candidate, introduced an amendment to H.R.
3074, the Transportation Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2008, prohibiting the use of federal funds for participating in working groups under the Security and Prosperity Partnership, including the creation of NAFTA
Superhighways. On July 24, Hunter's amendment passed 362 to 63, with strong bipartisan support. Later, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 3074 by a margin of 268-153. The bill has been sent to the Senate with Hunter's amendment included. According to Freedom of Information Request documents obtained by WND, Jeffrey Shane has been appointed by the Bush administration to be the U.S. lead bureaucrat on the North American Transportation Working Group under the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. On July 23, 1997, the NAFTA Superhighway Coalition was formed to promote continental highway development in association with the Ambassador Bridge.
---------------------------------
Jerome R. Corsi is a staff reporter for WND. He received a Ph.D. from Harvard
University in political science in 1972 and has written many books and articles,
including his latest best-seller, "The Late Great USA." Corsi co-authored with
John O'Neill the No. 1 New York Times best-seller, "Unfit for Command: Swift
Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry." Other books include "Showdown with
Nuclear Iran," "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics
of Oil," which he co-authored with WND columnist Craig. R. Smith, and "Atomic
Iran."
North American Union driver's license created
Logo intended to standardize documentation across continent
New security logo on the reverse of
North Carolina's driver's licenses
Security and Prosperity Partnership logo
Posted: September 6, 2007
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
The first "North American Union" driver's license, complete with a hologram of the continent on the reverse, has been created in North Carolina.
"The North Carolina driver's license is 'North American Union' ready," charges William Gheen, president of Americans for Legal Immigration.
Gheen provided WND with a photo of an actual North Carolina license which clearly shows the hologram of the North American continent embedded on the reverse.
"The hologram looks exactly [like] the map of North America that is used as the background for the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America logo on the SPP website," Gheen told WND. "I object to the loss of sovereignty that is proceeding under the agreements being made by these unelected government bureaucrats who think we should be North American instead of the United States of America.
"To protest, I don't plan on applying for a North Carolina driver's license," Gheen told WND, "even though I am a resident of the state. I don't see how a Division of Motor Vehicles authorized in a Department of Transportation of a state of the United States can force me to have a license place that is designed with a North American Union insignia printed on the backside.
"My decision not to get a North Carolina driver's license could have very difficult consequences for me," Gheen told WND. "Without a valid driver's license, I may not be able to drive a car, fly on an airplane, or enter a government building."
Gheen told WND he does not have a U.S. passport.
INVASION OF AMERICA
www.greatdreams.com/political/invasion_of_america.htm
GREATDREAMS.COM - MAIN INDEX