compiled by Dee Finney
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9-29-04 - DREAM - I was in the office of Juneau
Village Garden Apartments in Milwaukee, WI. I was helping a short, small Jewish woman who was taking over as manager of the building. I gave her a new set of keys that hadn't even been cut yet. The locksmith would have to be called to cut the keys for her. There was also a taller, thinner woman there, who was the current manager. She was leaving the job in three weeks and would be training the Jewish woman to do her job. The taller woman told me that she had kicked out everyone I had rented to when I was Manager. I asked her why she had done that. I told her that many of these people were long-time residents, always paid their rent on time and never caused any problems and for many months at a time the building would be full and there would be no turn-over at all. She just shrugged her shoulders. She knew that she had made a mistake. I was going to have to trust the woman because she was going to be the one training the Jewish woman. I went into the supply and key closet with the Jewish woman and I showed them a folder with gold and white striped socks. I gave the smaller Jewish woman the smallest of the socks and I gave the taller woman the longer socks. I didn't need any of these socks because mine were pure white. I then helped the woman decorate the office with little Christmas trinkets. They weren't very large, but it was enough to show that they celebrated Christmas. As I woke up, I heard a booming male voice which said: "ISRAEL: THE MARRIAGE BOND!" "Jehovah! Is very hurt. He has built a nation which is being destroyed from inside. He would appreciate help from the United States to turn it around and Christianize it."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
God and Israel: The Marriage MetaphorThe Lord said to me…, “Have you seen what faithless Israel has
done? She has gone up on every high mountain and under every green tree
and there she has played the harlot.”
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
name “Hosea” is from a familiar root, “Yeshuah,” from which we
derive the word, “Salvation,” or the “Lord saveth.” The verb
form appears in ch. 1:7, “I will have mercy upon the house of
Judah, and will save them by the Lord their God, and will not save them
by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen.” THEME:
To declare God’s loving kindness, tender mercy and forbearance with a
disloyal people, and His readiness to reverse the calamities caused by
their failures, and change the punishment for national sins on the
conditions of repentance and return to Him. 2.
The Divine communications received and its resultant repose. (Chs. 8-
14) TEACHING:
The method of instruction in this prophecy may be indicated as follows: The
figures used are wonderfully instructive and include the freshness of
the dew, the fairness of the lily and the fragrance of Lebanon. These
gracious benefits replaced the drought, defilement and dearth that had
so long blighted their civil and social life. Yet
such blessings in themselves were not enough to meet the national need.
Unless cleansing is followed by constancy, forgiveness combined with
fidelity, and faith conjoined with fruitfulness there can be no lasting
stability. Therefore their roots were to become strong like the bastions
of the Lebanon forests. Their beauty was to be as the olive, they were
to revive as the corn and flourish as the vine. The
corn, wine and oil imply fruit, more fruit and much fruit. He forgave
their guilt, and furnished them with gifts. Such
love is beyond all telling, more perfect it breaks the backs of all
words when we attempt to describe it. More majestic than the heavens,
more extensive than the firmament, more expansive than the ocean, His
love surpasseth knowledge. Hosea dwells more on the love of God than any
other Old Testament prophet. “Who
is wise and he shall understand these things, prudent and he shall know
them.” (Hos. 14:9) ISRAEL’S
INSINCERITY In
the Old .Testament. History there is found no other instance in which a prophet of
God is called upon to enter into the deepest degree of agonizing grief
and appalling anguish in the sphere of domestic life, in order to
demonstrate to a people the grievous way in which they had wounded the
love of God. ISRAEL’S
INCONSTANCY, Ch. 2 While
I was working with Dr. Walter L. Wilson of Kansas City, a young married
woman with her two little girls called at the surgery. Upon entering the
consulting room, she left the children in the waiting lounge. Her story
was of the usual type. Her husband had found someone who gave him more
time and attention, and when she had completed her story of woe, the
Doctor looked at her, and said, “Yes, and you are largely to blame.”
He asked the young wife if she did her best when preparing meals, to
select the food she knew her husband liked best. “No,” said she,
“I would not put myself out for him, to prepare anything he liked.”
“And was that always your attitude?" asked the Doctor. “No,”
said she. “At one time I prepared everything that he said he liked,
but I would not do it for him now.” “And do you ever go out to meet
him when he is returning from the office?” asked the Doctor. “No”
she said, “I have long since given over that practice. He prefers
other company to mine.” “Very well,” he said, “I will now tell
you what to do. This paramour is giving him all the time he wants, she
is meeting his wishes at every turn, and the only way to rectify the
situation is for you to go one better. Ask him tomorrow morning when he
leaves for work what time he will be home, and what he would like most
for his dinner. Dress the two children in their newest, prettiest
frocks; dress yourself in your very best; be ready at the corner when he
turns into your street. Say to him as he approaches, ‘Daddy, we are so
glad that you've come home,’ and let him take the hand of each child
as he walks to the house. When you get inside greet him the way you used
to do, and tell him you have something nice for his dinner. Practice
this for a week, and come back and tell me the result.” She replied,
“I don't know whether I could do it, Dr. Wilson.” “Did you once do
it?” he asked. “Oh, yes,” she said, “I was in the habit of doing
it once.” Then he said, “You do it again.” The remedy was crucial,
exasperating, but she faced it, and did it and in three weeks' time
returned, with a new light in her eyes, and the care‑worn
appearance gone. She said to Dr. Wilson, with tears streaming from her
eyes, O Doctor, it worked so wonderfully. I cannot tell you all, but we
had the matter out in solitude, and everything is now put right. Thank
you so much for the advice.” Revealing
— “And the Lord took Israel aside,” and, in the solitude,
loftier heights than the cliffs of Achor loomed on the landscape, a
society of Holy fellowship, set in the surroundings of spiritual
sacredness, with a distant outlook of greater and more radiant glory,
greeted her. Achor was to become a fresh spring for the renewal of
courage to stiffen character and sustain in conflict. Well may we repair
again to the valley, reflect on the adversary who was inflicted with
ignominious defeat, and then recall the secret of victorious recovery.
The place of rebuke and retreat will then become the place of
revelation, rapture, and rejoicing. The
southernmost Cape in Africa had for centuries been called the Cape of
Death because the ships that tried to negotiate the treacherous currents
seldom returned. At length in 1487 the great Portuguese sailor, Admiral
Diaz, turned the prow of his vessel into the teeth of the gale and
succeeded in navigating the turbulent waters. To his amazement on the
eastern side he discovered a vast placid ocean, whereupon it was
considered appropriate to rename the African promontory, and change it
from the Cape of Death, to the Cape of Good Hope. Vasco da Gama followed
the course ten years later, and landed at Goa on the west coast of
India. So likewise the Valley of Achor with its humiliation was
transformed into a vision of hope with prospective triumph. Responding
— “Thou shalt call
him Ishi, my husband.” This is consistent with the great
prophet Isaiah, and corresponds to his declaration in Isa. 62:4-5. God
requires from His people whole-hearted and utter, unreserved committal.
How close He draws: Into what a degree of intimacy He initiates us, and
invites our participation, yet He will not share a title or a treasure
with another. He refuses the double heart and cannot accept such. Love
is one for one. To love is to live. To love earnestly is to live
effectively; to love endearingly is to live enduringly; to love evermore
is to live eternally. God will not tolerate any longer the more common name for husband, “Balli,” meaning “Master,” for this title had been prostituted to evil associations, it savored too much of Baal-peor, Baal-zephon, Baal-gad, Baal-zebub, and a score of others. “I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth,” v. 17. What a cleansing! To have the very remembrances of the former lewd, licentious lapses obliterated so that the slightest degree of recollection is lost to all consciousness. Ratifying
— The
confirming of the covenant ratifies the relationship forever, v. 18. The
world of nature is so harmonious that the harassing things become
harmless. The hostile factors are now a help; forces that frustrated
hopes are now listed among the friendly aids. The noxious things become
innoxious; in place of the perturbation of war, there is prevailing
peace. All hostility is transmuted into harmony. The Septuagint Version
of the last line of v. 10, reads, “I will make thee to lie down in
hope.” It is rendered “in safety,” Psa. 4:8, Deut. 33:12,28.
The figure is that of reclining restfully and safely in the delectable
field of hope where perfect peace prevails, all this because the
glorious Bridegroom is now both Guardian and Guide. The Shepherd-lover
has secured His objective. Creation itself contributes to the charm of
the contentment shared in His companionship. Reinstating,
vs. 19-20 — As the beauties of earth and bounties of heaven
combine in blessing the betrothed, so, nearer and nearer, dearer and
dearer, becomes the relationship. The immutables of the triune God are
indicated and intimated in the three-fold testament of intention —“I
will betroth,” “I will betroth,” “I will betroth.” Let us
consider carefully the character of this changeless covenant, for no
neutral tints appear here. The colors are flaming, gorgeously brilliant
and intense. Lo-ruhamah
— “not having obtained mercy,” is changed to Ruhamah, “having
obtained mercy,” and Lo-ammi — “not my people” — is changed to
Ammi “my people.” This culmination is the outcome of a great
reversal, and notice that the last verse in ch. 2 is a repetition of the
first verse of the same chapter, as if used as a refrain to communicate
an achieved aim. Therefore, the truth of Isaiah is demonstrated, viz.,
declaring the end from the beginning, Isa. 46:10.
Remembering,
ch.
3:1 — Israel was not chosen as a people because of being
affable and lovable, Deut. 7:6-9. God’s faithfulness to His promise
made to the fathers is given as the reason why He so resolutely and
readily honored His word. The enormity of Gomer’s guilt and the
indecency of her iniquitous behavior did not quench Hosea's love, nor
did the floods of ingratitude drown it.
Notice how this fact is clearly indicated in the use made of the
words, “Beloved of her friend,” Hos. 3:1. The sensual appetite that
longed for flagons of wine and cakes of raisins was stronger than
spiritual apprehension and adoration. Here in the two parts of a
vitally-connected symbolism supply the illustration of the truth which
is presented in the prophecy, while the prophecy itself is the
explanation of the symbolical transaction. In other words, the single
truth is submitted first in illustration and then by explanation. The
explanation of the meaning of the illustration is stated in the words
“according to the love of the Lord for the children of Israel,”
v. 1. The theme is so lovely and lofty in beauty that it is worthy of
more careful consideration and space than we can devote to it. Hosea
previously went to a certain section of the community to win the fallen,
he is now bidden to go promptly to the same society and win back the
faithless. The
conclusion of this illustrative story is indicated in a sentence. “According
to the love of the Lord toward the Children of Israel.” The true
quality of friendship is interpreted as being the attachment of love,
while the quintessence of that friendship is the adherence of loyalty.
True love is not an attitude which stands hard by when the sea is
smooth, the sky blue, the supplies plentiful, and the strength vigorous,
but forsakes when the way is rough, the task rugged, the provision
restricted, and the weather rigorous. The best friend is better far than
a thousand butterflies that flit from flower to flower in the sunshine,
but fly away when the storm begins to gather on the horizon. Reviewing
— Nothing
in history is so problematical as the persistent persecution of the Jews
and yet, withal, their perpetual preservation. Although they are
citizens in every country in the world, they are denied citizenship in a
national home. Although banished, buffeted and bereaved, and forbidden
the rights of a country with their own governing policy, they,
nevertheless, flourish and are maintained in undiminished hope and in an
unbroken spirit of expectancy. They still await the call of the outcasts
of Israel and the dispersed of Judah. No other people possess a line of
descendants that witnessed the golden age of Egypt, the greatness of
Nineveh, the grandeur of Babylon, the growth of Medo-Persia, the Grecian
conquests, and the glory of Rome. These, and many other features, form a
definite proof that they are being preserved through the centuries to
participate in the ultimate consummation revealed in ch. 2. They are yet
to return, and seek the Lord their God, and David their King. We
sometimes overlook that the meaning of David is “beloved,” and the
voice from the excellent glory actually said, “This is my son David in
whom I am well pleased.” ISRAEL’S
INDECENCY Ch. 4: 1-10
The Lord is said to have a controversy with the nation, which
implies a legal cause with a lawful charge attached. The purpose of this
is to demonstrate that Jehovah had righteous claims which were being
wholly ignored, and in order to prevent misunderstanding among the
surrounding nations and all future posterity, God exposed the crime and
expressed the sentence. In ch. 4 charges are laid, the conduct is
described, and the condemnation passed upon the offenders. The
vagrancy and villainy that idolatry breeds violates every vestige of
spiritual virtue. In themselves, idols lack the qualities that entitle
them to the respect and reverence or all such as are just and upright.
Somehow there is a strong tendency in the human heart to want something
to behold rather than something to believe. Gaudy glitter is considered
preferable to the glorious grace of God. Tawdry tinsel is esteemed more
highly than trust in truth. Sensuous séances are sought after more
eagerly than spiritual secrets. These people vaunted their vulgarities
to such an extent that God withdrew Himself. The word may be rendered,
“He delivered or freed Himself from them.” The priests, clad
in the saintly robes of the sanctuary, cloaked their corruption,
participated in outrage, while the state policy connived and condoned
idol worship. The spirit of idolatry motivates its votaries equally as
does the immortal Spirit of God move and energize those who venerate
God. “I
will be unto Ephraim as a moth.” “I
will be unto Ephraim as a lion.”
-vs. 12,14.
The change in the divine attitude must have been startling and
acute enough to shock their susceptibilities had Israel not looked upon
Assyria and Egypt as nations that were outside the boundaries of the
administration of the Almighty, while they themselves constituted the
inner circle of His intimate associates.
How staggering the thought that the Lord would work invisibly and
invidiously as a moth, and as rottenness from within for their
destruction, and as an obvious overbearing oppressor from without, for
their devastation. The lion pounces upon its prey regardless of pity, so
would Assyria devastate the land. “The Lord shall hiss for the fly
that is in the uttermost part of the rivers of Egypt, and for the bee
that is in the land of Assyria.” Isa. 7:18.
The moth may come out of a folded mantle, the fly may emerge from
a festering carcass, the bee may appear from the far-flung forest, yet
these are within the orbit of omnipotence for Him to use when and how He
will. Mysterious powers may be hidden away that God can harness to fulfill
His plan. The Lord's controlling purpose and comprehensive providence
are untrammeled by the limitations of human thinking. Are we in the
habit of confining God's activity to the smallness of parochial
perimeters and circumscribed circles? Momentous movements that fashion
the forces exercised in national judgments and which in turn determine
destinies often have a very insignificant origin. We may well ask.
“What can a moth or a fly or a bee achieve?” “They
have not cried unto Me with their heart."
ch. 7:2,14. The
Responsive Complaint, v.
4 — The sorrows of an
almighty Lover are expressed in vs. 4-11. “O
Ephraim, what shall I do unto thee?” “O
Judah, what shall I do unto thee?”
Love mourns when all possible resources for restoration are
exhausted without the designed recovery being effected. God bemoaned
that their goodness was as a morning cloud which looked so promising at
dawn, but dwindled away as the day developed.
The
Reproving Chastisement, v.
5 — The words of the Prophet had flashed fire when denouncing the
social sins of the nation. The accusations, however, were blended with
appeals. “My judgment is as the light that goeth forth,”
which signifies God's judgment as being clear and convicting and
impossible of being challenged or obstructed. Today the perverted codes
of national morality in public, politic, and civic life which cater for
loose living, need the same vigorous protest of the prophet's voice.
The
Regrettable Cause, v.
6 — “I desired mercy, and not sacrifice.” The unmerciful
methods practiced, and the unmitigated murder of spiritual aspiration
were intermingled with the many sacrifices of the Mosaic order. Such
behavior was blasphemous and utterly incongruous. Why devote a sacrifice
to God while their own hearts were devoid of sympathy toward their
fellows whom they were slaughtering instead of saving? The priests
themselves instead of accepting sacrifices for the salvation of the
people were making them idolaters and teaching them to commit lewdness,
whereas they should have taught them the knowledge of God.
The
Repressed Covenant, v.
7 — “They like men have transgressed the covenant.” Solemn
vows were violated, sacred contracts were cancelled without concern.
Sacrificial pledges were prostituted, stipulated instructions were
ignored, steadfast bonds were broken, statutory resolves were
repudiated, while selfish indulgences and sinful impunities were
greedily and flagrantly perpetrated. Some people are like snails, they
leave a slime track wherever they go. The
national attitude is made clear by the use of eight negatives in the
chapter: “They consider not,” v. 2; “none calleth unto
Me,” v. 7; “he knoweth it not,” v. 9; “they do not
return,” v. 10; “nor seek Him for all this,” v. 10; “without
heart,” v. 11; “they have not cried unto Me,” v. 14;
“they return, but not to the most High," v. 16. Their
falsity and flattery were aggravated by their friendship with scorners,
v. 5. The fires of lust were well supplied with fuel, v. 6, and the New
Testament description, “They burned in their lust, one toward
another,” is very applicable. Fraternity with strangers had
depleted their strength so that they became flaccid as dough on one
side, and hard as a cinder on the other, vs. 8, 9. Failing vigor and
decay of devotion signified by gray hairs, together with the folly
demonstrated in being as a silly dove, and seeking help from Egypt and
Assyria, illustrated their unhappy plight, vs. 9-11.
Ezekiel described Jerusalem's undignified birth, Eze. 16:1-5, her
unmerited covenant, vs. 6‑14, and her unseemly behavior, vs.
15-34.Yet withal the divine beneficence bestowed upon her the
supreme treasure in the gift of life, v. 6, the sublime trousseau in the
gift of love, vs. 7‑12, and the stately throne in the gift of
liability, longevity and liberty. “Thou didst prosper as a kingdom,”
v. 13.
For a people to forsake the fathomless felicities of divine
faithfulness for the frivolous fancies of idolatry is an inscrutable
moral mystery.
Remember that the city is a symbol of the maximum of society,
therefore ultimately the Holy City, New Jerusalem, is destined to
descend from God out of heaven as a bride adorned for her husband, Rev.
21:10. Isaiah also depicts the perfected society, the new name, and
queenly dignity, all of which are divinely bestowed, Isa. 62:1-9. Surely
the appeal of this amazing aim should win and woo the soul to abide in
steadfast constancy, in relation to a Bridegroom of such dignity,
majesty and glory.
ISRAEL’S
INSOLENCE Ch. 8 Every
aspect contributes fresh evidence against the sinning nation as being
the offending party. The charges made declared in plainest terms the
stark inconsistency of the national attitude. When, in earlier history,
the nation was faced with the facts of the covenant, they wholeheartedly
resolved to render allegiance, but were now flagrantly rebelling against
it. The trouble did not involve some trifling detail, but the whole
mediatorial contract was violated. The
word joy in v. 1 means “exultation” and implies “leaping for very
joy.” This is the only occurrence of the word in the prophecy,
although the cognate verb occurs in ch. 10:5. The noun form is traceable
but ten times over the whole range of Scripture from Job 3:22 to Dan.
1:10. This exultant bridal joy had been hindered by a history that was
blighted with unfaithfulness and intemperance. On this account,
fellowship, felicity, and fruitful growth had ceased entirely. ISRAEL’S
IRREVERENCE Ch. 10 ISRAEL’S
INDIFFERENCE Ch. 11
God's
Endearing Grace — “But
they knew not that I healed them.” God ministered to the moral
maladies of the soul, the mental immaturities of the spirit, as well as
the many forms of physical frailty. In His patience He perfected that
which concerned them, although they were unmindful of His mercy and
ungrateful for His unfailing faithfulness.
The
Lord's Controversy
2nd
Charge:Unfaithfulness — Israel
lapsed when she lost the consciousness of the immediateness of her
Defender and Deliverer. Inconstancy is usually enacted at a distance
from right relationship, and in darkness which is the occasion of evil.
When a soul is environed with a real sense of God, there is a reverence
for His rights and regard for His righteousness which makes it easy to
do right and hard to do wrong.
3rd
Charge:Unsteadfastness
— A marginal rendering of the last portion of v. 12 reads as follows:
“Judah is yet unsteadfast with God and with the Holy One who is
faithful.” The verb employed here is used of cattle when they have
broken loose, or as yet have not been fastened or tethered. They are
still in a condition and position to ramble about. This is a very apt
picture of roaming, roving Christians. Far too many are living lives
that are unbridled, unruly, uncurbed, yea, unsubmitted to the yoke, like
animals that have not been broken in. How many are living God-ignoring
lives, ranging wherever they like, to gratify self-will. During the
reigns of Hezekiah, Jehoshaphat, and Josiah, the people of Israel seemed
willing to submit to “the yoke that is easy” and to the One Whose
“burden is light,” but how soon they broke loose again. The
unsteadfastness is aptly described in the following chapter where they
are spoken of as a cloud, as dew, as chaff, and as smoke. (ch. 13:3)
These figures suggest all that is unstable, unreliable, undesirable and
unsociable. We need these Heavenly estimates of our purposeless living
to curb and counteract instability. Veneer cannot hide vanity, nor can
cosmetics cover up contrariety. Surface repentance is usually a device,
or a decoy to deceive.
4th
Charge:Ungodliness
—
“Ephraim
feedeth on wind.” This figure suggests a self‑deluded,
self-deceived condition of life. Oh, “the deceitfulness of sin,”
which results in the soul striving after glamour, tinsel, vagaries, and
vanities that are nothing but an empty show. The cast wind that is
mentioned is scorching and withering, and creates a craving thirst, but
never refreshes, never satiates, and never suffices. When God is
displaced no substitute can secure contentment.
5th
Charge:Unbelief — Covenant‑making
with Assyria and Egypt, instead of confiding in God, is a very costly
business, and gallons of rich oil, one of the real requisites and foods
of the people, were carried to Egypt as the price of ratification for
unholy alliances. They were trusting in the arm of flesh instead of
resting on the everlasting arms. Unbelief and compromise lie at the root
of so much Christian failure, and that is why the exhortation of James
is given in such clear and explicit language. Jas. 4:4. We reap what we
sow, and Jacob is promised recompense for his renegade activities.
The
Lord's Compassion, vs.
3-6 — The prominence given to Jacob in this passage and the play
made upon the meaning of his name, are strikingly suggestive, yet what
mercy was shown him, this man of supplanting disposition who prevailed
by tearful pleading. Penitence and faith lay behind his prayer as an
encouragement to all Jacobs who are moved to tears when their trickery
or treachery has been discovered. Tears frequently turn the tables in
the favor of those who shed them. The tears of the child in the
bulrushes touched a tender spot in the heart of Pharaoh's daughter; the
tears of Ishmael, the outcast, when as a boy perishing in the
wilderness, his very weeping led to a springing well being disclosed to
him; when David was reflecting upon such occasions of grief in his own
experience, he addressed the Almighty, petitioning Him in the words, “Put
my tears into Thy bottle,” Psa. 56:8; but the crisis in Jacob's
history was not merely attended with mercy, but marked the time when a
lasting memorial was erected, for it was on that occasion he saw God's
host encamped about his own company for protection against Esau's
approaching host; the same angelic host which undoubtedly had delivered
him from Laban's band of retainers that had been turned back to its
base. Jacob's experience at that time led to the coining of the new
name, “The Lord of Hosts,” a memorial throughout all generations and
one which marked the moment of the great change that came to Jacob's
character and made him Israel, “God is Prince.” Note particularly
that his power with God, and prevailing over the angel, were not wrought
by wrestling, but by weeping. The eventual message of these events is
stated in v. 6, “Therefore turn thou to thy God.” He is still thine
and through this representative man He spake with us, v. 4. What a
relationship! What a responsibility, what a resource, and all that is
required is true repentance. Turn thou, although a very Jacob in nature
and practice there is nothing to hinder us having the same wonderful
experience, even to the extent of being transformed into an Israel. The
Lord's Constancy, vs.
7-11 — As the picture unfolds, conditions become sad in the
extreme. In the face of infinite generosity, Ephraim turns to defraud
and deceive, and devote heart‑interests to the gaining of wealth.
In other words, he makes pleasure, treasure, and leisure life's
objective. The word rendered “substance” in v. 8, is the same as
“strength” in v. 3. Combined with this spirit of presumption and
prostitution, mark the use he makes of the pronoun “I” in v. 8. To
counteract Ephraim's perverseness, God uses the same pronoun
emphatically three times over in vs. 9-10, but how gracious the
emphasis, recalling the bondage of Egypt, recounting the redemption
wrought for their deliverance, and reminding of the innumerable benefits
and blessings brought to the nation by the prophetic ministry. Did not
that very ministry present God in the reality of His loving-kindness,
ready to receive and forgive, ready again to reestablish the Feast of
Tabernacles with its matchless joy accompanying the bounty of harvest?
They had lost the enjoyment of these festivities because of their
unfaithfulness, ch. 1:1-2. (See also ch. 2:9-11) Nevertheless His
love is willing to do this work all over again. His constancy is the
more effectively demonstrated by virtue of His maintaining communication
with them in their unfaithfulness. Through the medium of the prophets He
had kept up correspondence although they had long since ceased to reply.
Had it not been His habit all through the years to send His messengers
to make advances and to seek for any trace of a desire that might be
awakened in their heart to return to their true Lover? The
Lord's Care, vs.
12,14 — The defending of Judah in his dilemma, the direction of
Israel in his difficulty, the deliverance from the dinners of Egypt,
were all providential dealings which witnessed to His watchful care.
These activities were not undertaken by an array of armies controlled by
great generals, but were effected by the prophets, a method that God has
continued to adopt through the centuries. In the bitter days of Charles
I He called Oliver Cromwell from a little farm in Huntington. He
summoned John Knox for the deliverance of Scotland, and Whitfield and
Wesley to save England from revolution. He is still mindful of His
unfaithful bride. For till this day the church of God demonstrates her
infidelity in her resorting to scientific deductions and modernistic
tendencies while ignoring His ineffable love. ISRAEL’S
EXPERIENCE Ch. 13 Forwardness
of Pride, vs.
1-2 —The opening verse implies there was a time when Ephraim
walked with God, and his authority caused people to tremble. His power
had been paramount, but pride and presumption paralyzed his ability to
rule, and his dignity was degraded to such a depth that all spiritual
aspiration perished. “He died,” reminding of our Lord's statement,
“This my son was dead.” (Luke 15:24) The description given recalls
that the great warrior-leader Joshua was born of this tribe and subdued
the heathen nations of the Promised Land. When the tribe in its
haughtiness of pride resorted to incipient idolatry, homage was given to
calves, which were relics of Egyptian worship, with the inevitable
outcome that Ephraim was humiliated. The
Fickleness of Petulance, vs.
3-6 — The Shepherd of Israel knew His sheep, “I knew thee in the
wilderness,” v. 5. This truth was emphasized by Christ, the good
Shepherd, who said, “I know my sheep and am known of mine.”
(John 10:14) The
Fierceness of Punishment, vs.
7-14 — The seven-fold use of "I will" in this
section, indicates the Divine determination to dispense justice to a
degree that their defiance and decadence warranted. The four beasts that
are figurative of the true nature of Gentile dominion are suggestive of
characteristics of administration in the kingdoms represented. The lion
suggested supreme power without pity; the leopard expressed snarling
ferocity without feeling; the bear symbolized superior might without
mercy; and the wild beast portrays severe cruelty without conscience.
These combined, forecast the ambitious forces that were being prepared
as a scourge of correction to cleanse the people of their corruption.
The prophecy of Joel describes these powers as comprising a great army,
and likens them to the palmerworm, locust, cankerworm, and caterpillar.
The book of Daniel reveals these same powers with a more detailed
description, in order to set out in broad contrast the great difference
between the beastly powers of human administration, and the beneficent
rule of the Divine authority. The grim picture of threatening distress
and disaster grows denser and darker as we proceed, yet withal, there is
a rift in the dark cloud, and a gleam of light and hope flashes from the
distant horizon, “I will ransom thee from the hand of the grave, I
will redeem them from death,” v. 4. But in the meantime sounds
forth the pathetic wail, “O death where be thy plagues, O grave
where be thy destruction; repentance shall be hid from thine eyes,”
v. 14. So, in the midst of these rapids of retribution there is a rock
of hope. A mount of mercy towers above the landscape, its gleaming
summit rising from the midst of an avalanche of misery. The nation had
withdrawn all allegiance from serving the Lord, so the Lord had
withdrawn all assurance of safeguarding Israel, Hos. 5:6. The sowing and
reaping is the inevitable working of God’s righteous and irrevocable
law. This caused the Lord to say, “O Israel, thou hast destroyed
thyself but in me is thine help.”
Where is thy king? v. 9. The last of the kings of the ten tribes
was already a prisoner to the Assyrians, II Kings 17:3- 4. The first
twenty-three verses of the chapter should be read with care in the light
of Hosea ch. 13. Had the Prophet not warned the nation that the time
would come when they would no longer obtain mercy from God, and would
not be owned as His people? (ch. 1:6-9)
The
Fatalness of Peversity, vs.
15,16 — The word
“shall” is used nine times in these two verses to describe the utter
desolation that would destroy Samaria. There is no longer any reprieve.
The hour of doom has struck. Nevertheless, the words of Moses ring out
over the centuries, “But if from thence thou shalt seek the Lord
thy God thou shalt find Him.” When we allow Him to have the
mastery He deals with the deepest malady of the soul, and proves Himself
a comforter for heart troubles, and a physician for spiritual agonies.
“Where is there any other that may save thee?” (v. 10) ISRAEL’S
REPENTANCE Ch. 14: 1- 4 ISRAEL’S
ACCEPTANCE Ch. 14:4-9 The
Fatherless — “With
thee the fatherless findeth mercy.” The nation had
long‑since forsaken the God of Israel for idolatry, and now at
this stage they jettison the idols of heathenism and are therefore
pictured as being in a fatherless state. God had commanded the nation to
show sympathy to the fatherless, Deut. 24:17‑22, and they knew
that He would not do less for them than He commanded that they should do
for others. In their confession they repeat the expression, “We will,
we will, we will,” vs. 2 & 3, and receive the ready response from
God, “I will, I will, I will,” vs. 4 & 5, which was all so
reminiscent in character of the promises made to the Fathers. The
Forgiveness — “I
will heal their backsliding,” v. 4. This is one of the singularly
wonderful features of the divine dealing with Israel, and one of the
most momentous displays of the divine disposition in activity. National
forgiveness is assured in the high hour of failure when the absolute
futility of unfaithfulness has been impressed upon the heart. Their
attitude of approach and acknowledgment of wrong indicates a confidence
in the fidelity of God to Whom they were now repairing. Besides all
this, they received a clearer conception of the falsity of the system
they were about to relinquish. Where is the arbiter who is in a position
to determine the degree of guilt which caused such injury to be
inflicted on the infinitely tender heart of their age-long Benefactor
Whose love they had outraged, Whose name they had dishonored, Whose law
they had disregarded, Whose worship they had discarded, and Whose
goodness they had despised? The
Fullness — “I
will love them freely.” This is without limitation. Heavenly
affection is immune from human limitation and, measured in the
immeasurable favor shown is one of the hallmarks of the divine God's
unchanging faithfulness. They were immediately made conscious of the
Lord's gracious nearness and Fatherly tenderness, a wealth of perfect
love cast out all fear, the charm and calm of contentment immediately
became their heritage because of the divine complacency finding perfect
rest in love's sure character.
What does it mean to be assured of the love of the altogether
lovely One? Does it not speak of stability, for He is steadfast; does it
not impart fidelity, for He is faithful; does it not convey constancy,
for He is changeless; does it not assure strength, for He is the strong
Son of God? The whole range of grace emanates from Him, for this is He
Who is the loftiest and lowliest; the highest and humblest, the greatest
and gentlest, the truest and tenderest, the mightiest and meekest, the
noblest and nearest, yea, the kingliest and kindliest. It is well for us
to remember that “in Him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead
bodily, and ye are complete in Him.” The
Freshness — “I
will be as the dew unto Israel.” The high ranges of northern
Palestine, including Mount Hermon with its perpetual snow, the humidity
in the low lying Jordan Valley with its bountiful evaporation at the
Dead Sea, and the proximity of the Mediterranean, are physical features
that assure the distillation of dew to the otherwise dry Land of
Promise. In poetic and picturesque array Hosea assembles a wealth of
aptly chosen features from the scenic environs of the land to express
his prophetic forecast for the encouragement of the repentant nation.
The figures are drawn from the fields, the flowers, the fruits, the
foliage, and the forests, all of which are familiar to the country folk.
These are used also as a medium for expressing the spiritual substance
of virtue and fidelity characteristic of the new life, which results
from repentance and renewal. When the earthly fountain of human resource
fails, the freshness of the dew-drenched life prevails. We do well to
consider the manner of its congealing, for dew distils silently, gently,
suddenly, and invisibly from the surrounding atmosphere above. The wise
man of Israel, whose counsel was said to be as the oracle of God, gave
expression to the words, “We will light upon him as the dew falleth
upon the ground.” (II Sam. 17:12) What a figure of considerateness
when God descended in manifestation in Christ. It is written of Him, “A
bruised reed shall He not break,” (Isa. 42:3) How delicately and
softly the dew descends without doing the slightest damage to the
tenderest petal of a sensitive plant! What sparkling beauty bedecks the
dew-bespangled shrubs, what a still calmness prevails and presides o'er
the landscape as it settles, what jewel-like flashes of scintillating
light reflect from the flowers as the early rays of light cause the
dew-drops to sparkle! The
Fairness —
“He shall grow as the lily.” The purity, symmetry, and
modesty of the lilies have become proverbial universally, and when in
the morning light its bedewed loveliness is reflected, we have a glimpse
of perfect beauty. Such characteristics in the restored life are
sustained by communion with God. Dew is the purest of water and leaves
no spot nor stain behind it, no, not even on the translucent petal of
the most delicate flower. This fact reminds us of what our Saviour has
purposed doing for His redeemed people when He “presents them
faultless before the presence of His glory,” without spot or
wrinkle or any such thing. The
Faithfulness — “He
cast forth his roots as Lebanon, His branches shall spread.” The
fairness of purity by itself is inadequate. Instability and infidelity
had long held a prominent place among the ugly traits of national
iniquity to which Israel at this stage confessed, v. 2. The time had
arrived when constancy and loyalty were to replace all forms of
duplicity. The
Fearlessness — “They
that dwell under His shadow shall return,” v. 7. From a state of
timidity and from by-ways of obscurity the people return to the Lord and
enter unafraid into His very presence to dwell there as in a permanent
abode. The polluted things that paralyze are purged away; the habits and
haunts that defile are discarded, while the forces and follies that
prevented progress are frustrated forever. 1.
THE SHADOW OF HIS WINGS
— “Because Thou hast been my help, therefore in the shadow of Thy
wings will I rejoice.” (Psa. 63:7) This shadow is for daily
troubles. 2.
THE SHADOW OF THE ALMIGHTY
— “He that dwelleth in the secret place of the Most High, shall
abide (or pass the night) under the shadow of the Almighty.” (Psa.
91:1; c.f. Isa. 26:3) This shadow is for daily trust. 3.
THE SHADOW OF A GREAT ROCK
— “Behold a king shall reign in righteousness and princes shall
rule in judgment, and a man shall be a hiding place from the wind, and a
covet from the tempest; as rivers of water in a dry place, as the shadow
of a great rock in a weary land.” (Isa. 32:1, 2) This shadow is
for daily thirst. 4.
THE SHADOW OF HIS HAND
— “He hath made my mouth like a sharp sword; in the shadow of His
hand hath He hid me, and made me a polished shaft; in His quiver hath He
hid me; and said unto me, Thou art my servant.” (Isa. 49:2) This
shadow is for daily tasks. 5.
THE SHADOW OF HIS PRESENCE —
“I sat down under His shadow with great delight, and His fruit was
sweet to my taste.” (Song of Sol. 2:3) This shadow is for daily
teaching. 6.
THE SHADOW OF HIS TABERNACLE
— “And there shall be a tabernacle for a shadow in the daytime
from the heat, and for a place of refuge, and for a covert from storm
and from rain.” (Isa. 4:6) This shadow is for daily trials. 7.
THE SHADOW OF HIS BOUNTY
— “They that dwell under His shadow shall return, they shall
revive as the corn and grow as the vine.” (Hos. 14:7) This shadow
is for daily triumph. The
Fruitfulness
— “His beauty shall be as the olive tree ... they shall revive as
the corn and grow as the vine.” How amiable life becomes when we
abide in Him, yea, and how abundantly prolific. When wickedness and
lawlessness prevailed, the nation was likened to chaff which as a
symbol, indicates everything that is dry, rootless, lifeless and
fruitless, ch. 13:3. The corn, wine and oil are representative,
metaphors that convey the ideal of all-round sustenance, assuring the
soul of nourishment, enjoyment and contentment. The picture of
prosperity painted in fair colors, figures vigorous energy in the corn,
virtuous enthusiasm in the wine, and victorious endeavor in the oil, and
these three are entirely in harmony with God's will and pleasure. The
vitality of such a life makes it free from superficial trifling and all
sentimental trash. The
Friendliness — “From
me is thy fruit found.” The One Who seeks to set restrictions to
hedge up our way, ch.2:6, does so in order to hinder the soul from
setting out on a profitless venture and worthless course. He Himself has
a definite intent in so doing, for He is waiting to give to His loved
ones who answer His call fresh unveilings that are aflame with glory,
vaster visions, more radiant with beauty and greater glimpses of the
infinite reality of that coming Kingdom. His own perfect loveliness is
sufficient to ravish the heart and satisfy the longing soul with
goodness. Ephraim, which means “double fruitfulness,” a name
designated by Joseph in Egypt, will then say most feelingly and
emphatically, “What have I to do any more with idols? I have heard and
observed Him.” Let us remember that the Son of God said to His
disciples, “The branch cannot bear fruit of itself, no more can ye
except ye abide in me,” and again, “If a man love me he will
keep my sayings, and my Father will love him and we will come unto him
and make our abode with him.” “Who is wise and he will
understand these things, prudent and he shall know them, for the ways of
the Lord are right, and the just shall walk therein?"
THE
LORD’S INTIMACY FROM: http://www.fbinstitute.com/Rolls/Hosea.htm |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Marriage Contract
There was once a king—relates the Midrash—who went off on a distant journey and left his bride with her maidservants. Because of the promiscuity of the maidservants, rumors began circulating about the king's bride. The king heard of this and wished to kill her. When the bride's guardian heard this, he tore up her marriage contract, saying: "Should the king say, 'My wife did such and such,' we shall say to him, 'She's not your wife yet.'"[9] The king in this parable—the Midrash goes on to explain— is G-d, the bride is the nation of Israel, the corrupt maids are the eirev rav (the "mixed multitude" who had joined the Jewish people at the Exodus and were responsible for the making of the Golden Calf), the bride's guardian is Moses, and the marital contract is the Torah. When G-d wished to destroy Israel because of their involvement in the worship of the Golden Calf, Moses broke the Tablets upon which G-d had transcribed the essence of His covenant with them, thereby dissolving the marriage-bond that Israel had allegedly violated and leaving G-d no grounds on which to punish His bride's unfaithfulness. And this the Torah considers to be Moses' highest virtue: his unequivocal loyalty to the Jewish people, a loyalty even greater than his loyalty to the Torah. When the very existence of the Jewish people was threatened, Moses tore up the wedding contract in order to save the bride. When the existence of Israel was in jeopardy, Moses did not consult with anyone, not even with G-d. When Moses had to choose between the Torah and Israel, his devotion to Israel superseded all—including that which defines the very essence of his own being. It is for this reason that Moses' breaking of the Tablets was the greatest deed of his life. In everything else he did, he was acting on a clear mandate from G-d: G-d had instructed and empowered him to take the Jews out of Egypt, to split the Red Sea, and to transmit His wisdom and will to humanity. Always it was G-d's desire that he followed. Here, it was his own initiative. Here, he wrestled with G-d, "grabbing hold" of the Tablets to save the people of Israel. In breaking the Tablets, Moses was acting on his own, contrary to his divine mission to deliver G-d's Torah to the world. In breaking the Tablets, Moses, who could not presume that G-d would replace the first Tablets with a second pair, was eradicating his very being, his very raison d'être, for the sake of his people. And Moses did not go off to a corner to carry out the most painful and potentially self-destructive act of his life. He broke the Tablets "before the eyes of all Israel"—a fact which the Torah repeatedly emphasizes, and then reiterates in its concluding words. For Moses wished to demonstrate to all of Israel, and to all generations to come, the duty of a leader of the Jewish people: to be prepared not only to sacrifice his physical life for his flock, but his very soul and spiritual essence as well. First Among Firsts Not only does the Torah record that G-d endorsed Moses' breaking of the Tablets; not only does it proclaim that Moses' greatest deed was his placing the preservation of Israel above the integrity of their "marriage contract"; it also chooses to make this its own culminating message. With its closing words the Torah establishes that it sees its own existence as secondary to the existence of the people of Israel. The Midrash says it thus: Two things preceded G-d's creation of the world: Torah and Israel. Still, I do not know which preceded which. But when Torah states 'Speak to the Children of Israel...,' 'Command the Children of Israel...'—I know that Israel preceded all.[10] In other words, since the purpose of G-d's creation of the universe is that the people of Israel should implement His will as outlined in the Torah, the concepts of "Israel" and "Torah" both precede the concept of a "world" in the Creator's "mind." Yet which is the more deeply rooted idea within the divine consciousness, Torah or Israel? Does Israel exist so that the Torah may be implemented, or does the Torah exist to serve the Jew in the fulfillment of his mission and the realization of his relationship with G-d? Says the Midrash: if the Torah describes itself as a communication to Israel, this presumes the concept of Israel as primary to that of Torah. Without the people of Israel to implement it, there cannot be a Torah, since the very idea of a Torah was conceived by the divine mind as a tool to facilitate the bond between G-d and His people. Hence, when the Torah speaks of the shattering of the Tablets, it speaks not of its own destruction, but, ultimately, of its preservation: if the breaking of the Tablets saved Israel from extinction, it also saved the Torah from extinction, since the very concept of a "Torah" is dependent upon the existence of the people of Israel.[11] Pressing for Redemption Moses' self-negating devotion to his people characterized his leadership from its very start. When G-d first appeared to Moses in the burning bush and commanded him to take the Jewish people out of Egypt, Moses refused. For seven days and nights Moses argued with G-d. Don't send me, pleaded Moses, "Send the one whom You will send."[12] "G-d's anger raged against Moses," the Torah tells us.[13] Understandably so: the people of Israel are languishing under the Egyptian whip, and G-d's chosen redeemer is refusing his commission? Still Moses argued with G-d to "Send the one whom You will send" instead of himself. Why did Moses refuse to go? Was it his humility? True, the Torah attests that "Moses was the most humble man on the face of the earth."[14] But surely Moses was not one to allow his humility to interfere with the salvation of his people. Our sages explain that Moses knew that he would not merit to bring Israel into the Holy Land and thereby achieve the ultimate redemption of his people.[15] He knew that Israel would again be exiled, would again suffer the physical and spiritual afflictions of galut. So Moses refused to go. Do not send me, he pleaded; send now the one whom You will send in the end of days. If the time for Israel's redemption has come, send Moshiach, through whom You will effect the complete and eternal Redemption.[16] For seven days and nights Moses contested G-d's script for history, prepared to incur G-d's wrath upon himself for the sake of his people. Nor did Moses ever accept the decree of galut. After assuming, by force of the divine command, the mission to take Israel out of Egypt, he embarked on a lifelong struggle to make this the final and ultimate Redemption. To the very last day of his life, Moses beseeched G-d to allow him to lead Israel into the Holy Land, which would have settled Israel in their land, and G-d in Israel's midst, for all eternity;[17] to his very last day he braved G-d's anger in his endeavor to effect the ultimate Redemption. In Moses' own words: "I beseeched G-d at that time, saying: …'Please, let me cross over and see the good land across the Jordan, the good mountain (Jerusalem) and the Levanon (the Holy Temple).' And G-d grew angry with me for your sakes... and He said to me: 'Enough! Speak no more to Me of this matter.…'"[18] G-d said "Enough!" but Moses was not silenced. For Moses' challenge of the divine plan did not end with his passing from physical life. The Zohar tells us that every Jewish soul has at its core a spark of Moses' soul.[19] So every Jew who storms the gates of heaven clamoring for redemption continues Moses' struggle against the decree of galut. Based on the Rebbe's talks on Simchat Torah of 5747 (1986) and on other occasions[20] FROM: http://www.meaningfullife.com/torah/parsha/devarim/eikev/MosesDIV_Choice.php
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Events in the world are fulfilling End of the Age prophecies. But, he continues to print Conventional Wisdom about a conflict between America, Russia, and China, even though all the evidence from New World Order writings, and Biblical prophecy, dictate an intimate cooperation! The Bible predicted great "harmony" between End of the Age national leaders [Revelation 16-17], and it even states that the End of the Age is going to be characterized by two distinct ideologies that would enter into a marriage bond, even though they were so very different [Daniel 2:41-44, Amplified Bible Commentary] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
H O S E A. CHAP. I. The mind of God is revealed to this prophet, and by him to the people, in the first three chapters, by signs and types, but afterwards only by discourse. In this chapter we have, I. The general title of the whole book, ver. 1. II. Some particular instructions which he was ordered to give to the people of God. 1. He must convince them of their sin in going a whoring from God, by marrying a wife of whoredoms, ver. 2, 3. 2. He must foretel the ruin coming upon them for their sin, in the names of his sons, which signified God's disowning and abandoning them, ver. 4-6, 8, 9. 3. He must speak comfortable to the kingdom of Judah, which still retained the pure worship of God, and assure them of the salvation of the Lord, ver. 7. 4. He must give an intimation of the great mercy God had in store both for Israel and Judah, in the latter days (ver. 10, 11), for in this prophecy many precious promises of mercy are mixed with the threatenings of wrath.
1 The word of the LORD that came unto Hosea, the son of Beeri, in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah, and in the days of Jeroboam the son of Joash, king of Israel. 1. Here is the prophet's name and surname; which he himself, as other prophets, prefixes to his prophecy, for the satisfaction of all that he is ready to attest what he writes to be of God; he sets his hand to it, as that which he will stand by. His name, Hosea, or Hosea (for it is the very same with Joshua's original name), signifies a saviour; for prophets were instruments of salvation to the people of God, so are faithful ministers; they help to save many a soul from death, by saving it from sin. his surname was Ben-Beeri, or the son of Beeri. As with us now, so with them then, some had their surname from their place, as Micah the Morashite, Nahum the Elkoshite; others from their parents, as Joel the son of Bethuel, and here Hosea the son of Beeri. And perhaps they made use of that distinction when the eminence of their parents was such as would bring honour upon them; but it is a groundless conceit of the Jews that where a prophet's father is names he also was a prophet. Beeri signifies a well, which may put us in mind of the fountain of life and living waters from which prophets are drawn and must be continually drawing. 2. Here are his authority and commission: The word of the Lord came to him. It was to him; it came with power and efficacy to him; it was revealed to him as a real thing, and not a fancy or imagination of his own, in some such way as God then discovered himself to his servants the prophets. What he said and wrote was by divine inspiration; it was by the word of the Lord, as St. Paul speaks concerning that which he had purely by revelation, 1 Thess. iv. 15. Therefore this book was always received among the canonical books of the Old Testament, which is confirmed by what is quoted out of it in the New Testament, Matt. ii. 15; ix. 13; xii. 7; Rom. ix. 25, 26; 1 Pet. ii. 10. For the word of the Lord endures for ever. 3. Here is a particular account of the times in which he prophesied--in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah, and in the days of Jeroboam the son of Joash, king of Israel. We have only this general date of his prophecy; and not the date of any particular part of it, as, before, in Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel, and, afterwards, in Haggai and Zechariah. Here is only one king of Israel named, though there were many more within this time, because, having mentioned the kings of Judah, there was no necessity of naming the other; and, they being all wicked, he took no pleasure in naming them, nor would do them the honour. Now by this account here given of the several reigns in which Hosea prophesied (and it should seem the word of the Lord still came to him, more or less, at times, throughout all these reigns) it appears, (1.) That he prophesied a long time, that he began when he was very young, which gave him the advantage of strength and sprightliness, and that he continued at his work till he was very old, which gave him the advantage of experience and authority. It was a great honour to him to be thus long employed in such good work, and a great mercy to the people to have a minister so long among them that so well knew their state, and naturally cared for it, one they had been long used to and who therefore was the more likely to be useful to them. And yet, for aught that appears, he did but little good among them; the longer they enjoyed him the less they regarded him; they despised his youth first, and afterwards his age. (2.) That he passed through a variety of conditions. Some of these kings were very good, and, it is likely, countenanced and encouraged him; others were very bad, who (we may suppose) frowned upon him and discouraged him; and yet he was still the same. God's ministers must expect to pass through honour and dishonour, evil report and good report, and must resolve in both to hold fast their integrity and keep close to their work. (3.) That he began to prophesy at a time when the judgments of God were abroad, when God was himself contending in a more immediate way with that sinful people, who fell into the hands of the Lord, before they were turned over into the hands of man; for in the days of Uzziah, and of Jeroboam his contemporary, the dreadful earthquake was, mentioned Zech. xiv. 5 and Amos i. 1. And then was the plague of locusts, Joel i. 2-4; Amos vii. 1; Hos. iv. 3. The rod of God is sent to enforce the word and the word of God is sent to explain the rod, yet neither prevails till God by his Spirit opens the ear to instruction and discipline. (4.) That he began to prophesy in Israel at a time when their kingdom was in a flourishing prosperous condition, for so it was in the reign of Jeroboam the second, as we find 2 Kings xiv. 25, He restored the coast of Israel, and God saved them by his hand; yet then Hosea boldly tells them of their sins and foretels their destruction. Men are not to be flattered in their sinful ways because they prosper in the world, but even then must be faithfully reproved, and plainly told that their prosperity will not be their security, nor will it last long if they go on still in their trespasses.
2 The beginning of the word of the LORD by Hosea. And the LORD said to Hosea, Go, take unto thee a wife of whoredoms and children of whoredoms: for the land hath committed great whoredom, departing from the LORD. 3 So he went and took Gomer the daughter of Diblaim; which conceived, and bare him a son. 4 And the LORD said unto him, Call his name Jezreel; for yet a little while, and I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, and will cause to cease the kingdom of the house of Israel. 5 And it shall come to pass at that day, that I will break the bow of Israel in the valley of Jezreel. 6 And she conceived again, and bare a daughter. And God said unto him, Call her name Lo-ruhamah: for I will no more have mercy upon the house of Israel; but I will utterly take them away. 7 But I will have mercy upon the house of Judah, and will save them by the LORD their God, and will not save them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen. These words, The beginning of the word of the Lord by Hosea, may refer either, 1. To that glorious set of prophets which was raised up about this time. About this time there lived and prophesied Joel, Amos, Micah, Jonah, Obadiah, and Isaiah; but Hosea was the first of them that foretold the destruction of Israel; the beginning of this word of the Lord was by him. We read in the history of this Jeroboam here named (2 Kings xiv. 27) that the Lord had not yet said he would blot out the name of Israel, but soon after he said he would, and Hosea was the man that began to say it, which made it so much the harder task to him, to be the first that should carry an unpleasing message and some time before any were raised up to second him. Or, rather, 2. To Hosea's own prophecies. This was the first message God sent him upon to this people, to tell them that they were an evil and an adulterous generation. He might have desired to be excused from dealing so roughly with them till he had gained authority and reputation, and some interest in their affections. No; he must begin with this, that they might know what to expect from a prophet of the Lord. Nay, he must not only preach this to them, but he must write it, and publish it, and leave it upon record as a witness against them. Now here, I. The prophet must, as it were in a looking-glass, show them their sin, and show it to be exceedingly sinful, exceedingly hateful. The prophet is ordered to take unto him a wife of whoredoms and children of whoredoms, v. 2. And he did so, v. 3. He married a woman of ill fame, Gomer the daughter of Diblaim, not one that had been married and had committed adultery, for then she must have been put to death, but one that had lived scandalously in the single state. To marry such a one was not malum in se--evil in itself, but only malum per accidens--incidentally an evil, not prudent, decent, or expedient, and therefore forbidden to the priests, and which, if it were really done, would be an affliction to the prophet (it is threatened as a curse on Amaziah that his wife should be a harlot, Amos vii. 17), but not a sin when God commanded it for a holy end; nay, if commanded, it was his duty, and he must trust God with his reputation. But most commentators think that it was done in vision, or that it is no more than a parable; and that was a way of teaching commonly used among the ancients, particularly prophets; what they meant of others they transferred to themselves in a figure, as St. Paul speaks, 1 Cor. iv. 6. He must take a wife of whoredoms, and have such children by her as every one would suspect, though born in wedlock, to be children of whoredoms, begotten in adultery, because it is too common for those who have lived lewdly in the single state to live no better in the married state. "Now" (saith God) "Hosea, this people is to me such a dishonour, and such a grief and vexation, as a wife of whoredoms and children of whoredoms would be to thee. For the land has committed great whoredoms." In all instances of wickedness they had departed from the Lord; but their idolatry especially is the whoredom they are here charged with. Giving that glory to any creature which is due to God alone is such an injury and affront to God as for a wife to embrace the bosom of a stranger is to her husband. It is especially so in those that have made a profession of religion, and have been taken into covenant with God; it is breaking the marriage-bond; it is a heinous odious sin, and, as much as any thing, besots the mind and takes away the heart. Idolatry is great whoredom, worse than any other; it is departing from the Lord, to whom we lie under greater obligations than any wife does or can do to her husband. The land has committed whoredom; it is not here and there a particular person that is guilty of idolatry, but the whole land is polluted with it; the sin has become national, the disease epidemical. What an odious thing would it be for the prophet, a holy man, to have a whorish wife, and children whorish like her! What an exercise would it be of his patience, and, if she persisted in it, what could be expected but that he should give her a bill of divorce! And is it not then much more offensive to the holy God to have such a people as this to be called by his name and have a place in his house? How great is his patience with them! And how justly may he cast them off! It was as if he should have married Gomer the daughter of Diblaim, who probably was at that time a noted harlot. The land of Israel was like Gomer the daughter of Diblaim. Gomer signifies corruption; Diblaim signifies two cakes, or lumps of figs; this denotes that Israel was near to ruin, and that their luxury and sensuality were the cause of it. They were as the evil figs that could not be eaten, they were so evil. It intimates sin to be the daughter of plenty and destruction the daughter of the abuse of plenty. Some give this sense of the command here given to the prophet: "Go, take thee a wife of whoredoms, for, if thou shouldst go to seek for an honest modest woman, thou wouldst not find any such, for the whole land, and all the people of it, are given to whoredom, the usual concomitant of idolatry." II. The prophet must, as it were through a perspective glass, show them their ruin; and this he does in the names given to the children born of this adulteress; for as lust, when it has conceived, brings forth sin, so sin, when it is finished, brings forth death. 1. He foretels the fall of the royal family in the name he is appointed to give to his first child, which was a son: Call his name Jezreel, v. 4. We find that the prophet Isaiah gave prophetical names to his children (Isa. vii. 3; viii. 3), so this prophet here. Jezreel signifies the seed of God (so they should have been); but it signifies also the scattered of God; they shall be as sheep on the mountains that have no shepherds. Call them not Israel, which signifies dominion, they have lost all the honour of that name; but call them Jezreel, which signifies dispersion, for those that have departed from the Lord will wander endlessly. Hitherto they have been scattered as seek; let them now be scattered as chaff. Jezreel was the name of one of the royal seats of the kings of Israel; it was a beautiful city, seated in a pleasant valley, and it is with allusion to that city that this child is called Jezreel, for yet a little while and I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, from whom the present king, Jeroboam, was lineally descended. The house of Jehu smarted for the sins of Jehu, for God often lays up men's iniquity for their children and visits it upon them. It is the kingdom of the house of Israel, which may be meant either of the present royal family, that of Jehu, which God did quickly cause to cease (for the son of this Jeroboam, Zechariah, reigned but six months, and he was the last of Jehu's race), or of the whole kingdom in general, which continued corrupt and wicked, and which was made to cease in the reign of Hoshea, about seventy years after; and with God that is but a little while. Note, Note, Neither the pomp of kings nor the power of kingdoms can secure them from God's destroying judgments, if they continue to rebel against him. (2.) What is the ground of this controversy: I will revenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, the blood which Jehu shed at Jezreel, when by commission from God and in obedience to his command, he utterly destroyed the house of Ahab, and all that were in alliance with it, with all the worshippers of Baal. God approved of what he did (2 Kings x. 30): Thou has done well in executing that which is right in my eyes; and yet here God will avenge that blood upon the house of Jehu, when the time has expired during which it was promised that his family should reign, even to the fourth generation. But how comes the same action to be both rewarded and punished? Very justly; the matter of it was good; it was the execution of a righteous sentence passed upon the house of Ahab, and, as such, it was rewarded; but Jehu did it not in a right manner; he aimed at his own advancement, not at the glory of God, and mingled his own resentments with the execution of God's justice. He did it with a malice against the sinners, but not with any antipathy to the sin; for he kept up the worship of the golden calves, and took no heed to walk in the law of God, 2 Kings x. 31. And therefore when the measure of the iniquity of his house was full, and God came to reckon with them, the first article in the account is (and, being first, it is put for all the rest) for the blood of the house of Ahab, here called the blood of Jezreel. Thus when the house of Baasha was rooted out it was because he did like the house of Jeroboam, and because he killed him, 1 Kings xvi. 7. Note, Those that are entrusted with the administration of justice are concerned to see to it that they do it from a right principle and with a right intention, and that they do not themselves live in those sins which they punish in others, lest even their just executions should be reckoned for, another day, as little less than murders. (3.) How far the controversy shall proceed; it shall be not a correction, but a destruction. Some make those words, I will visit, or appoint, the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, to signify, not as we read it the revenging of that bloodshed, but the repeating of that bloodshed: "I will punish the house of Jehu, as I punished the house of Ahab, because Jehu did not take warning by the punishment of his predecessors, but trod in the steps of their idolatry. And after the house of Jehu is destroyed I will cause to cease the kingdom of the house of Israel; I will begin to bring it down, though now it flourish." After the death of Zechariah, the last of the house of Jehu, the kingdom of the ten tribes went to decay, and dwindled sensibly. And, in order to the ruin of it, it is threatened (v. 5), I will break the bow of Israel in the valley of Jezreel; the strength of the warriors of Israel, so the Chaldee. God will disable them either to defend themselves or to resist their enemies. And the bow abiding in strength, and being renewed in the hand, intimates a growing power, so the breaking of the bow intimates a sinking ruined power. The bow shall be broken in the valley of Jezreel, where, probably, the armoury was; or, it may be, in that valley some battle was fought, wherein the kingdom of Israel was very much weakened. Note, There is no fence against God's controversy; when he comes forth against a people their strong bows are soon broken and their strong-holds broken down. In the valley of Jezreel they shed that blood which the righteous God would in that very place avenge upon them; as some notorious malefactors are hanged in chains just where the villainy they suffer for was perpetrated, that the punishment may answer the sin. 2. He foretels God's abandoning the whole nation in the name he gives to the second child. This was a daughter, as the former was a son, to intimate that both sons and daughters had corrupted their way. Some make to signify that Israel grew effeminate, and was thereby enfeebled and made weak. Call the name of this daughter Lo-ruhamah--not beloved (so it is translated Rom. ix. 25), or not having obtained mercy, so it is translated 1 Pet. ii. 10. It comes all to one. This reads the doom of the house of Israel: I will no more have mercy upon them. It intimates that God had shown them great mercy, but they had abused his favours, and forfeited them, and now he would show them favour no more. Note, Those that forsake their own mercies for lying vanities have reason to expect that their own mercies should forsake them, and that they should be left to their lying vanities, Jonah ii. 8. Sin turns away the mercy of God even from the house of Israel, his own professing people, whose case is sad indeed when God says that he will no more have mercy upon them. And then it follows, I will utterly take them away, will utterly remove them (so some), will utterly pluck them up, so others. Note, When the streams of mercy are stopped we can expect no other than that the vials of wrath should be opened. Those whom God will no more have mercy upon shall be utterly taken away, as dross and dung. The word for taking away sometimes signifies to forgive sin; and some take it in that sense here: I will no more have mercy upon them, though in pardoning I have pardoned them heretofore. Though God has borne long, he will not bear always, with a people that hate to be reformed. Or, I will no more have mercy upon them, that I should in any wise pardon them, or (as our margin reads it) that I should altogether pardon them. If pardoning mercy is denied, no other mercy can be expected, for that opens the door to all the rest. Some make this to speak comfort: I will no more have mercy upon them till in pardoning I shall pardon them, that is, till the Redeemer comes to Zion to turn away ungodliness from Jacob. The Chaldee reads it, But, if they repent, in pardoning I will pardon them. Even the greatest sinners, if in time they bethink themselves and return, will find that there is forgiveness with God. III. He must show them what mercy God had in store for the house of Judah, at the same time that he was thus contending with the house of Israel (v. 7): But I will have mercy upon the house of Judah. Note, Though some are justly cast off for their disobedience, yet God will always secure to himself a remnant that shall be the vessels and monuments of mercy. When divine justice is glorified in some, yet there are others in whom free grace is glorified. And, though some through unbelief are broken off, yet God will have a church in this world till the end of time. It aggravates the rejection of Israel that God will have mercy on Judah, and not on them, and magnifies God's mercy to Judah that, though they also have done wickedly, yet God did not reject them, as he rejected Israel: I will have mercy upon them and will save them. Note, Our salvation is owing purely to God's mercy, and not to any merit of our own. Now, 1. This, without doubt, refers to the temporal salvations which God wrought for Judah in a distinguishing way, the favours shown to them and not to Israel. When the Assyrian armies had destroyed Samaria, and carried the ten tribes away into captivity, they proceeded to besiege Jerusalem; but God had mercy on the house of Judah, and saved them by the vast slaughter which an angel made, in one night, in the camp of the Assyrians; then they were saved by the Lord their God immediately, and not by sword or bow. When the ten tribes were continued in their captivity, and their land was possessed by others, they being utterly taken away, God had mercy on the house of Judah and saved them, and, after seventy years, brought them back, not by might or power, but by the Spirit of the Lord of hosts, Zech. iv. 6. I will save them by the Lord their God, that is, by myself. God will be exalted in his own strength, will take the work into his own hands. That salvation is sure which he undertakes to be the author of; for, if he will work, none shall hinder. And that salvation is most acceptable which he does by himself. So the Lord alone did lead him. The less there is of man in any salvation, and the more of God, the brighter it shines and the sweeter it tastes. I will save them in the word of the Lord (so the Chaldee), for the sake of Christ, the eternal word, and by his power. I will save them not by bow nor by sword, that is, (1.) They shall be saved when they are reduced to so low an ebb that they have neither bow nor sword to defend themselves with, Judg. v. 8; 1 Sam. xiii. 22. (2.) They shall be saved by the Lord when they are brought off from trusting to their own strength and their weapons of war, Ps. xliv. 6. (3.) They shall be saved easily, without the trouble of sword and bow, v. 7. Isa. ix. 5, I will save them by the Lord their God. In the calling him their God, he upbraids the ten tribes who had cast him off from being theirs, for which reason he had cast them off, and intimates what was the true reason why he had mercy, distinguishing mercy, for the house of Judah, and saved them: it was in pursuance of his covenant with them as the Lord their God, and in recompence for their faithful adherence to him and to his word and worship. But, 2. This may refer also to the salvation of Judah from idolatry, which qualified and prepared them for their other salvations. And this is indeed a salvation by the Lord their God; it is wrought only by the power of his grace, and can never be wrought by sword or bow. Just at the time that the kingdom of Israel was utterly taken away, under Hoshea, the kingdom of Judah was gloriously reformed, under Hezekiah, and was therefore preserved; and in Babylon God saved them from their idolatry first, and then from their captivity. 3. Some make this promise to look forward to the great salvation which, in the fulness of time, was to be wrought out by the Lord our God, Jesus Christ, who came into the world to save his people from their sins.
8 Now when she had weaned Lo-ruhamah, she conceived, and bare a son. 9 Then said God, Call his name Lo-ammi: for ye are not my people, and I will not be your God. 10 Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people, there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living God. 11 Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together, and appoint themselves one head, and they shall come up out of the land: for great shall be the day of Jezreel. We have here a prediction, I. Of the rejection of Israel for a time, which is signified by the name of another child that Hosea had by his adulterous spouse, v. 8, 9. And still we must observe that those children whose names carried these direful omens in them to Israel were all children of whoredoms (v. 2), all born of the harlot that Hosea married, to intimate that the ruin of Israel was the natural product of the sin of Israel. If they had not first revolted from God, they would never have been rejected by him; God never leaves any till they first leave him. Here is, 1. The birth of this child: When she had weaned her daughter, she conceived and bore a son. Notice is taken of the delay of the birth of this child, which was to carry in its name a certain presage of their utter rejection, to intimate God's patience with them, and his unwillingness to proceed to extremity. Some think that her bearing another son signifies that people's persisting in their wickedness; lust still conceived and brought forth sin. They added to do evil (so the Chaldee paraphrase expounds it); they were old in adulteries, and obstinate. 2. The name given him: Call him Lo-ammi--Not my people. When they were told that God would no more have mercy on them they regarded it not, but buoyed up themselves with this conceit, that they were God's people, whom he could not but have mercy on. And therefore he plucks that staff from under them, and disowns all relation to them: You are not my people, and I will not be your God. "I will not be yours (so the word it); I will be in no relation to you, will have nothing to do with you; I will not be your King, your Father, your patron and protector." We supply it very well with that which includes all, "I will not be your God; I will not be to you what I have been, nor what you vainly expect I should be, nor what I would have been if you had kept close to me." Observe, "You are not my people; you do not act as becomes my people; you are not observant of me and obedient to me, as my people should be; you are not my people, but the people of this and the other dunghill-deity; and therefore I will not own you for my people, will not protect you, will not put in any claim to you, not demand you, not deliver you out of the hands of those that have seized you; let them take you; you are none of mine. You will not have me to be your God, but pay your homage to the pretenders, and therefore I will not be your God; you shall have no interest in me, shall expect no benefit from me." Note, Our being taken into covenant with God is owing purely to him and to his grace, for then it begins on his side: I will be to them a God, and then they shall be to me a people; we love him because he first loved us. But our being cast out of covenant is owing purely to ourselves and our own folly. The breach is on man's side: You are not my people, and therefore I will not be your God; if God hate any, it is because they first hated him. This was fulfilled in Israel when they were utterly taken away into the land of Assyria, and their place knew them no more. They were no longer God's people, for they lost the knowledge and worship of him; no prophets were sent to them, no promises made to them, as were to the two tribes in their captivity; nay, they were no longer a people, but, for aught that appears, were mingled with the nations into which they were carried, and lost among them. II. Of the reduction and restoration of Israel in the fulness of time. Here, as before, mercy is remembered in the midst of wrath; the rejection, as it shall not be total, so it shall not be final (v. 10, 11): Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea. See how the same hand that wounded is stretched forth to heal, and how tenderly he that has torn binds up; though God cause grief by his threatenings, yet he will have compassion, and will gather with everlasting kindness. They are very precious promises which are here made concerning the Israel of God, and which may be of use to us now. 1. Some think that these promises had their accomplishment in the return of the Jews out of their captivity in Babylon, when many of the ten tribes joined themselves to Judah, and took the benefit of the liberty which Cyrus proclaimed, came up in great numbers out of the several countries into which they were dispersed, to their own land, appointed Zerubbabel their head, and coalesced into one people, whereas before they had been two distinct nations. And in their own land, where God had by his prophets disowned and rejected them as none of his, he would by his prophets own them and appear for them as his children; and from all parts of the country they should come up to the temple to worship. And we have reason to think that, though this promise has a further reference, yet it was graciously intended and piously used for the support and comfort of the captives in Babylon, as giving them a general assurance of mercy which God had in store for them and their land; their nation could not be destroyed so long as this blessing was in it, was in reserve for it. 2. Some think that these promises will not have their accomplishment, at least not in full, till the general conversion of the Jews in the latter days, which is expected yet to come, when the vast incredible numbers of Jews, that are now dispersed as the sand of the sea, shall be brought to embrace the faith of Christ and be incorporated in the gospel-church. Then, and not till then, God will own them as his people, his children, even there where they had lain under the dismal tokens of their rejection. The Jewish doctors look upon this promise as not having had its accomplishment yet. But, 3. It is certain that this promise had its accomplishment in the setting up of the kingdom of Christ, by the preaching of the gospel, and the bringing in both of Jews and Gentiles to it, for to this these words are applied by St. Paul (Rom. ix. 25, 26), and by St. Peter when he writes to the Jews of the dispersion, 1 Pet. ii. 10. Israel here is the gospel-church, the spiritual Israel (Gal. vi. 16), all believers who follow the steps, and inherit the blessing of faithful Abraham, who is the father of all that believe, whether Jews or Gentiles, Rom. iv. 11, 12. Now let us see what is promised concerning this Israel. (1.) That it shall greatly multiply, and the numbers of it be increased; it shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered. Though Israel according to the flesh be diminished and made few, the spiritual Israel shall be numerous, shall be innumerable. In the vast multitudes that by the preaching of the gospel have been brought to Christ, both in the first ages of Christianity and ever since, this promise is fulfilled, thousands out of every tribe in Israel, and out of other nations, a multitude which no man can number, Rev. vii. 4, 9; Gal. iv. 27. In this the promise made to Abraham, when God called him Abraham the high father of a multitude, had its full accomplishment (Gen. xvii. 5), and that Gen. xxii. 17. Some observe that they are here compared to the sand of the sea, not only for their numbers, but as the sand of the sea serves for a boundary to the waters, that they shall not overflow the earth, so the Israelites indeed are a wall of defence to the places where they live, to keep off judgments. God can do nothing against Sodom while Lot is there. (2.) That God will renew his covenant with the gospel-Israel, and will incorporate it a church to himself, by as full and ample a charter as that whereby the Old-Testament church was incorporated; nay, and its privileges shall be much greater: "In the place where it was said unto them, You are not my people, there shall you be again admitted into covenant, and owned as my people." The abandoned Gentiles in their respective places, and the rejected Jews in theirs, shall be favoured and blessed. There, where the fathers were cast off for their unbelief, the children, upon their believing, shall be taken in. This is a blessed resurrection, the making of those the people of God that were not a people. Nay, but the privilege is enlarged; now it is not only, You are my people, as formerly, but You are the sons of the living God, whether by birth you were Jews or Gentiles. Israel under the law was God's son, his first-born, but then they were as children under age; now, under the gospel, they have grown up both to greater understanding and greater liberty, Gal. iv. 1, 2. Note, [1.] It is the unspeakable privilege of all believers that they have the living God for their Father, the ever-living God, and may look upon themselves as his children by grace and adoption. [2.] The sonship of believers shall be owned and acknowledged; it shall be said to them, for their comfort and satisfaction, nay, and it shall be said for their honour in the hearing of the world, You are the sons of the living God. Let not the saints disquiet themselves; let not others despise them; for, sooner or later, there shall be a manifestation of the children of God, and all the world shall be made to know their excellency and the value God has for them. [3.] It will add much to their comfort, very much to their honour, when they are dignified with the tokens of God's favour in that very place where they had long lain under the tokens of his displeasure. This speaks comfort to the believing Gentiles, that they need not go up to Jerusalem, to be received and owned as God's children; no, they may stay where they are, and in that place, though it be in the remotest corner of the earth, in that place where they were at a distance, where it was said to them, "You are not God's people," but are separated from them (Isa. lvi. 3, 6), even there, without leaving their country and kindred, they may by faith receive the Spirit of adoption, witnessing with their spirits that "they are the children of God." (3.) That those who had been at variance should be happily brought together (v. 11): Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together. This uniting of Judah and Israel, those two kingdoms that were now so much at variance, biting and devouring one another, is mentioned only as a specimen, or one instance, of the happy effect of the setting up of Christ's kingdom in the world, the bringing of those that had been at the greatest enmity one against another to a good understanding one of another and a good affection one to another. This was literally fulfilled when the Galileans, who inhabited that part of the country which belonged to the ten tribes, and probably for the most part descended from them, so heartily joined with those that were probably called Jews (that were of Judea) in following Christ and embracing his gospel; and his first disciples were partly Jews and partly Galileans. The first that were blessed with the light of the gospel were of the land of Zebulun and Naphtali (Matt. iv. 15); and, though there was no good-will at all between the Jews and the Galileans, yet, upon their believing in Christ, they were happily consolidated, and there were no remains of the former disaffection they had to one another; nay, when the Samaritans believed, though between them and the Jews there was a much greater enmity, yet in Christ there was a perfect unanimity, Acts viii. 14. Thus Judah and Israel were gathered together; yet this was but a type of the much more celebrated coalition between Jews and Gentiles, when, by the death of Christ, the partition-wall of the ceremonial law was taken down. See Eph. ii. 14-16. Christ died, to gather together in one all the children of God that were scattered abroad, John xi. 51; Eph. i. 10. (4.) That Jesus Christ should be the centre of unity to all God's spiritual Israel. They shall all agree to appoint to themselves one head, which can be no other than he whom God has appointed, even Christ. Note, Jesus Christ is the head of the church, the one only head of it, not only a head of government, as of the body politic, but a head of vital influence, as of the natural body. To believe in Christ is to appoint him to ourselves for our head, that is, to consent to God's appointment, and willingly commit ourselves to his guidance and government; and this in concurrence and communion with all good Christians that make him their head; so that, though they are many, yet in him they are one, and so become one with each other. Qui conveniunt in aliquo tertio inter se conveniunt--Those who agree with a third agree with each other. (5.) That, having appointed Christ for their head, they shall come up out of the land; they shall come, some of all sorts, from all parts, to join themselves to the church, as, under the Jewish economy, they came up from all corners of the land of Israel to Jerusalem, to worship (Ps. cxxii. 4), Thither the tribes go up, to which there is a plain allusion in that prophecy of the accession of the Gentiles to the church (Isa. ii. 3), Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord. It denotes not a local remove (for they are said to be in the same place, v. 10), but a change of their mind, a spiritual ascent to Christ. They shall come up from the earth (so it may be read); for those who have given up themselves to Christ as their head take their affections off from this earth, and the things of it, to set them upon things above (Col. iii. 1, 2); for they are not of the world (John xv. 19), but have their conversation in heaven. They shall come up out of the land, though it be the land of their nativity; they shall, in affection, come out from it, that they may follow the Lamb withersoever he goes. Thus the learned Dr. Pocock takes it. (6.) That, when all this comes to pass, great shall be the day of Jezreel. Though great is the day of Jezreel's affliction (so some understand it), yet great shall be the day of Jezreel's glory. This shall be Israel's day; the day shall be their own, after their enemies have long had their day. Israel is here called Jezreel, the seed of God, the holy seed (Isa. vi. 13), the substance of the land. This seed is now sown in the earth, and buried under the clods; but great shall be its day when the harvest comes. Great was the church's day when there were added to it daily such as should be saved; then did the Almighty do great things for it. FROM: http://www.ccel.org/h/henry/mhc2/MHC28001.HTM [Table
of Contents]Matthew Henry STRIPED SOCKS A Tale of Two Sisters Except for a few age spots, Sally still looks the same as she did the year I stitched her up and placed her under the Christmas tree beside her sister. Her red yarn hair is still bright and stringy. Her stenciled face still smiles. Her red-and-white-striped socks and black cotton shoes still dangle beneath her long bloomers and white pinafore. Although Sally has been with us for many years now, I just recently learned the story behind her name. Even though Sally and her famous sister were both cut from the same fabric and stuffed with the same stuffing, Sally was destined to become the rag doll of a younger sibling. In spite of being loved just as much and dragged around more than her twin, Sally never received the recognition that she deserved. Even the authentic red heart tattooed on her chest wasn’t enough to stop an older sister’s decree that there just couldn’t be two dolls named Raggedy Ann. With only a three year old to defend her against the dictates of a six-year-old authoritarian, Sally never got the name she deserved. She was given a second-best name, Sally. I’m glad that God doesn’t care what names his children are given at birth. The apostle Peter tells us that God loves and accepts all of us in spite of our names. Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him. (Acts 10:35 KJV) To God, a Sally is just as important as a Raggedy Ann. He places His mark of identity upon the hearts of all those who are willing to receive Him. WHITE
- Spirit, innocence, protection, peace, purity, gentleness,
perfection, maiden, illumination |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Sinai Covenant
Arafat is not an Arab - He is Egyptian
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SPIRIT SPEAKS ABOUT THE ARK OF THE COVENANT
IS THE ARK OF THE COVENANT IN ETHIOPIA?
STRUGGLING WITH 11:11 - THE ROD OF AARON
THE MOST SYNCHRONISTIC DAY OF THE MILLENNIUM - 11 AUGUST 1999
THE SYMBOLISM AND SPIRITUAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE NUMBER FIVE
DREAMS OF THE GREAT EARTHCHANGES - RELIGIOUS DREAMS
|