3-3-09 - VISIONS - I saw a man holding a letter
addressed to Airman Nimrod Shellas_______, giving him instructions.
The letter was quite lengthy on the page.
VISION 2: I saw a closeup of Nimrod's face.
He had thick blonde hair and blue eyes with bangs over his forehead.
He raised his hand to brush his bangs upward, and I saw a thick blonde
braid right in the center that was cut short so it wouldn't stick out from
under the bangs which hid it.
The first thing I thought was 'unicorn', and then I
remembered that when I was young, I had a very prominent 'widow's peak in
that same spot and I was blonde and blue-eyed as well as a child.
NIMROD'S BRAID
Braiding usually consists of the
interweaving of at least three strands of material into an overlapping
pattern. Braiding can usually be done with a number of different materials
such as hair, string, yarn and rope and will often serve to increase the
strength and aesthetic value of the interwoven materials.
by Brannon M. Wheeler - 2002 - Religion - 391
pages
It is also mentioned that the two
braids were like horns on his head.
MOSES WITH A HORN OF HAIR
Moses from the Tomb
of Julius II. San Pietro
in Vincoli, Rome.Italy
... The believers
were Solomon, David, and Alexander. The disbelievers
were
Nimrod and Nebuchadnezzar. ...
books.google.com/books?isbn=0826449573...
In the Pagan religion of Mithraism,
Saturn
was another name of Nimrod or Tammuz as The hidden god."
Who was Nimrod?
Nimrod (Hebrew:
נִמְרוֹד,
StandardNimrod
Tiberianנִמְרֹד ;
Nimrōḏ
Persian: نمرود ) is a
Mesopotamian monarch mentioned in the
Book of Genesis, who also figures in many legends and
folktales. He is depicted in the Bible as a mighty ruler and
nation builder who founded many cities including the great
Babel
or
Babylon.
Son of Cush and grandson of Ham; his
name has become proverbial as that of a mighty hunter.
His "kingdom" comprised Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh,
in the land of Sinar, otherwise known as the land of
Nimrod (Gen. x. 8-10; I Chron. i. 10; Micah v. 5
[A. V. 6]).E.G.H.M.Sel.
Nimrod is the prototype of a rebellious
people, his name being interpreted as "he who made all
the people rebellious against God" (Pes. 94b; comp.
Targ. of pseudo-Jonathan and Targ. Yer. to Gen. x. 9).
He is identified with Cush and with Amraphel, the name
of the latter being interpreted as "he whose words are
dark" (; Gen. R.
xlii. 5; for other explanations see below). As he was
the first hunter he was consequently the first who
introduced the eating of meat by man. He was also the
first to make war on other peoples (Midr. Agadah to Gen.
x. 9).
Nimrod was not wicked in his outh. On
the contrary, when a young man he used to sacrifice to
Yhwh the animals which he caught while hunting ("Sefer
ha-Yashar," section "Noa," pp. 9a et seq.,
Leghorn, 1870). His great success in hunting (comp. Gen.
x. 9) was due to the fact that he wore the coats of skin
which God made for Adam and Eve (Gen. iii. 21). These
coats were handed down from father to son, and thus came
into the possession of Noah, who took them with him into
the ark, whence they were stolen by Ham. The latter gave
them to his son Cush, who in turn gave them to
Nimrod, and when the animals saw the latter clad
in them, they crouched before him so that he had no
difficulty in catching them. The people, however,
thought that these feats were due to his extraordinary
strength, so that they made him their king (Pirḳe R. El.
xxiv.; "Sefer ha-Yashar," l.c.; comp. Gen. R. lxv.
12).
According to another account, when
Nimrod was eighteen years old, war broke out
between the Hamites, his kinsmen, and the Japhethites.
The latter were at first victorious, but
Nimrod, at the head of a small army of Cushites,
attacked and defeated them, after which he was made king
over all the people on earth, appointing Terah his
minister. It was then, elated by so much glory, that
Nimrod changed his behavior toward Yhwh
and became the most flagrant idolater. When informed of
Abraham's birth he requested Terah to sell him the
new-born child in order that he might kill it (see
Jew. Encyc. i. 86a, s.v.Abraham in Rabbinical Literature).
Terah hid Abraham and in his stead brought to
Nimrod the child of a slave, which
Nimrod dashed to pieces ("Sefer ha-Yashar,"
l.c.).
Nimrod is generally considered to have
been the one who suggested building the Tower of Babel
and who directed its construction. God said: "I made
Nimrod great; but he built a tower in order that
he might rebel against Me" (Ḥul. 89b). The tower is
called by the Rabbis "the house of
Nimrod," and is considered as a house of idolatry
which the owners abandoned in time of peace;
consequently Jews may make use of it ('Ab. Zarah 53b).
After the builders of the tower were dispersed
Nimrod remained in Shinar, where he reestablished
his kingdom. According to the "Sefer ha-Yashar" (l.c.),
he at this time acquired the name "Amraphel" in allusion
to the fall of his princes ()
during the dispersion. According to the Targum of
pseudo-Jonathan (to Gen. x. 11), however,
Nimrod had left Babylonia before the building of
the tower, and had gone to Assyria, where he built four
other cities, namely, Nineveh, Rehobot, Calah, and Resen
(comp. Naḥmanides ad loc.).
The punishment visited on the builders
of the tower did not cause Nimrod
to change his conduct; he remained an idolater. He
particularly persecuted Abraham, who by his command was
thrown into a heated furnace; and it was on this
account, according to one opinion, that
Nimrod was called "Amraphel" (
= "he said, throw in"; Targ. pseudo-Jonathan to Gen.
xiv. 1; Gen. R. xlii. 5; Cant. R. viii. 8). When
Nimrod was informed that Abraham had come forth
from the furnace uninjured, he remitted his persecution
of the worshiper of Yhwh; but on the following
night he saw in a dream a man coming out of the furnace
and advancing toward him with a drawn sword.
Nimrod thereupon ran away, but the man threw an
egg at him; this was afterward transformed into a large
river in which all his troops were drowned, only he
himself and three of his followers escaping. Then the
river again became an egg, and from the latter came
forth a small fowl, which flew at
Nimrod and pecked out his eye. The dream was
interpreted as forecasting Nimrod's
defeat by Abraham, wherefore
Nimrod sent secretly to kill Abraham; but the
latter emigrated with his family to the land of Canaan.
Ten years later Nimrod came
to wage war with Chedorlaomer, King of Elam, who had
been one of Nimrod's
generals, and who after the dispersion of the builders
of the tower went to Elam and formed there an
independent kingdom. Nimrod
at the head of an army set out with the intention of
punishing his rebellious general, but the latter routed
him. Nimrod then became a
vassal of Chedorlaomer, who involved him in the war with
the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah, with whom he was
defeated by Abraham ("Sefer ha-Yashar," l.c.;
comp. Gen. xiv. 1-17).
Nimrod was slain by Esau, between whom
and himself jealousy existed owing to the fact that they
were both hunters (Targ. pseudo-Jonathan to Gen. xxv.
27; "Sefer ha-Yashar," section "Toledot," p. 40b; Pirḳe
R. El. l.c.; comp. Gen. R. lxv. 12).W.B.M.Sel.
Two prominent theories are now held in
regard to Nimrod's
identity: one, adopted by G. Smith and Jeremias, is that
Nimrod is to be identified with the Babylonian
hero Izdubar or Gishdubar (Gilgamesh); the second, that
of Sayce,Pinches, and others,
identifies Nimrod with
Marduk, the Babylonian Mercury. The former
identification is based on the fact that Izdubar is
represented in the Babylonian epos as a mighty hunter,
always accompanied by four dogs, and as the founder of
the first great kingdom in Asia. Moreover, instead of "Izdubar"—the
correct reading of which had not yet been determined—Jeremias
saw the possibility of reading "Namra Udu" (shining
light), a reading which would have made the
identification with Nimrod
almost certain. Those who identify
Nimrod with Marduk, however, object that the name
of Izdubar must be read, as is now generally conceded,
"Gilgamesh," and that the signs which constitute the
name of Marduk, who also is represented as a hunter, are
read phonetically "Amar Ud"; and ideographically they
may be read "Namr Ud"—in Hebrew "Nimrod." The difficulty
of reconciling the Biblical Nimrod,
the son of Cush, with Marduk, the son of Ea, may be
overcome by interpreting the Biblical words as meaning
that Nimrod was a
descendant of Cush.
Two other theories may be mentioned: one
is that Nimrod represents
the constellation of Orion; the other is that
Nimrod stands for a tribe, not an individual
(comp. Lagarde, "Armenische Studien," in "Abhandlungen
der Göttinger Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften," xxii.
77; Nöldeke, in "Z. D. M. G." xxviii. 279).
Bibliography: E.C.M.Sel.
By the Arabs
Nimrod is considered as the supreme example of
the tyrant ("al-jabbar"). There is some confusion among
Arabian historians as to Nimrod's
genealogy. According to one authority he was the son of
Mash the son of Aram, and consequently a Semite; he
built the Tower of Babel and also a bridge over the
Euphrates, and reigned five hundred years over the
Nabatæans, his kinsmen. But the general opinion is that
he was a Hamite, son of Canaan the son of Cush, or son
of Cush the son of Canaan (Ṭabari gives both); that he
was born at the time of Reu, and was the first to
establish fire-worship. Another legend is to the effect
that there were two Nimrods:
the first was the son of Cush; the second was the
well-known tyrant and contemporary of Abraham; he was
the son of Canaan and therefore a great-grandson of the
first Nimrod. According to
Mas'udi ("Muruj al-Dhahab," ii. 96),
Nimrod was the first Babylonian king, and during
a reign of sixty years he dug many canals in 'Iraḳ.
The author of the "Ta'rikh Muntaḥab"
(quoted by D'Herbelot in his "Bibliothèque Orientale")
identifies Nimrod with
Daḥḥak (the Persian Zoak), the first Persian king after
the Flood. But Al-Kharizmi ("Mafati al-'Ulum," quoted by
D'Herbelot) identifies him with Kai Kaos, the second
king of the second Persian dynasty.
Nimrod reigned where Bagdad is now situated, and
at first he reigned with justice (see Nimrod in Rabbinical Literature);
but Satan perverted him, and then he began to persecute
all the worshipers of God. His chief vizier was Azar (Terah),
the father of Abraham; and the midrashic legends of
Abraham's birth in which Nimrod
is mentioned, as well as those concerning
Nimrod's persecution of Abraham—whom he cast into
a furnace—are narrated also by the Mohammedans (see
Abraham in Apocryphal and Rabbinical Literature
and in Mohammedan Legend).
Nimrod is referred to in the Koran (xxi.
68-69). When Nimrod saw
Abraham come unharmed from the furnace, he said to him:
"Thou hast a powerful God; I wish to offer Him
hospitality." Abraham told him that his God needed
nobody's hospitality. Nevertheless
Nimrod ordered thousands of horned and small
cattle brought, and fowl and fish, and sacrificed them
all to God; but God did not accept them. Humiliated,
Nimrod shut himself in his palace and allowed no
one to approach him. According to another tradition,
Nimrod challenged Abraham, when the latter came
out of the furnace, to fight with him.
Nimrod gathered a considerable army and on the
appointed day was surprised to find Abraham alone. Asked
where his army was, Abraham pointed to a swarm of gnats,
which routed Nimrod's
troops (see, however, below).
Nimrod assembled his ministers and informed them
of his intention to ascend into the heavens and strike
down Abraham's God. His ministers having told him that
it would be difficult to accomplish such a journey, the
heavens being very high, Nimrod
conceived the idea of building a high tower, by means of
which he might accomplish his purpose (comp. Sanh.
109a). After many years had been spent in the
construction of the tower, Nimrod
ascended to its top, but he was greatly surprised to
find that the heavens were still as remote from him as
when he was on the ground. He was still more mortified
on the following day, when the tower collapsed with such
a noise that the people fainted with terror, those that
recovered losing their speech (an allusion to the
confusion of tongues).
Undaunted by this failure,
Nimrod planned another way to reach the heavens.
He had a large chest made with an opening in the top and
another in the bottom. At the four corners of the chest
stakes were fixed, with a piece of flesh on each point.
Then four large vultures, or, according to another
source, four eagles, previously fed upon flesh, were
attached to the stakes below the meat. Accompanied by
one of his most faithful viziers,
Nimrod entered the chest, and the four great
birds soared up in the air carrying the chest with them
(comp. Alexander's ascent into the air; Yer. 'Ab. Zarah
iii. 42c; Num. R. xiii. 13). The vizier opened
alternately the upper and lower doors of the chest in
order that by looking in both directions he might know
whether or not he was approaching heaven. When they were
so high up that they could see nothing in either
direction Nimrod took his
bow and shot arrows into the sky. Gabriel thereupon sent
the arrows back stained with blood, so that
Nimrod was convinced that he had avenged himself
upon Abraham's God. After wandering in the air for a
certain length of time Nimrod
descended, and the chest crashed upon the ground with
such violencethat the mountains trembled and the angels thought an order from
God had descended upon the earth. This event is alluded
to in the Koran (xiv. 47): "The machinations and the
contrivances of the impious cause the mountains to
tremble." Nimrod himself
was not hurt by the fall.
After these adventures
Nimrod continued to reign wickedly. Four hundred
years later an angel in the form of a man appeared to
him and exhorted him to repent, but
Nimrod declared that he himself was sole ruler
and challenged God to fight with him.
Nimrod asked for a delay of three days, during
which he gathered a considerable army; but this was
exterminated by swarms of gnats. One of these insects is
said to have entered Nimrod's
nose, reached the chambers of his brain, and gnawed at
it. To allay the pain Nimrod
ordered some one to strike with a hammer upon an anvil,
in order that the noise might cause the gnat to cease
gnawing (comp. the same story in connection with Titus
in Giṭ. 56b). Nimrod died
after forty years' suffering.
Bibliography: E.
G.H.M.Sel.
Despite his stance as a powerful leader, his
reputation was tarnished by his traditional association with the
construction of the
Tower of Babel. Outside of the Bible, several ruins preserve
Nimrod's name,[1]
and he is featured in the
midrash.
Mention of Nimrod in the Bible is rather limited. According to
the "documentary
hypothesis" of the Bible's origin, the
Jahwist writer(s) make the earliest mention of Nimrod.[1]
He is described as the son of
Cush, grandson of
Ham, great-grandson of
Noah;
and as "a mighty one on the earth" and "a mighty hunter before
the Lord". He also appears in the
First Book of Chronicles and in the
Book of Micah.
Nimrod is said to be the founder and
king of the first empire after the
Flood, and his realm is connected with the
Mesopotamian towns
Babylon (Babel),
Uruk,
Akkad and
Calneh. He is mentioned in the
Table of Nations (Genesis 10), where he is said to have
founded many cities. Owing to an ambiguity in the original Hebrew
text, it is unclear whether it is he or
Asshur who additionally founded
Nineveh,
Resen,
Rehoboth-Ir and
Calah, and both of these interpretations are reflected in the
various English versions.(Genesis
10:8–10)
Traditions and legends
Though not clearly stated in the Bible, Nimrod has since
ancient times traditionally been considered the creator of the
Tower of Babel. Since his kingdom included the towns in
Shinar, it is usually further assumed that it was under his
direction that the building began; this is the view adopted in the
Targums and later texts such as the writings of
Josephus. Some extrabiblical sources,[specify]
however, assert to the contrary, that Nimrod left the district
before the building of the tower.
According to Hebrew traditions, Nimrod was of
Mizraim by his mother, but came from
Cush son of
Ham and expanded Asshur, which he inherited. His name has
become proverbial as that of a "mighty hunter". His "kingdom"
comprised
Babel
(Babylon), Erech (Uruk), Accad (Akkad), and Calneh, in the land of
Shinar, otherwise known as the land of Nimrod (Genesis
10:8-10;
1 Chronicles 1:10,
Micah 5:6).
Josephus wrote:
Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and
contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a
bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not
to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were
happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which
procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the
government into
tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of
God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power…
Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of
Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God;
and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in
any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the
multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner
than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great,
and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height
seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was
built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of
bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When
God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy
them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction
of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by
producing in them diverse languages, and causing that, through
the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to
understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower
is now called
Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which
they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word
Babel,
confusion…
The
Book of Jubilees mentions the name of "Nebrod" (the Greek
form of Nimrod) only as being the father of
Azurad, the wife of
Eber
and mother of
Peleg
(8:7). This account would thus make him an ancestor of Abraham,
and hence of all Hebrews.
An early Arabic work known as Kitab al-Magall or the
Book of Rolls (part of
Clementine literature) states that Nimrod built the towns of
Hadâniûn,
Ellasar,
Seleucia,
Ctesiphon, Rûhîn,
Atrapatene, Telalôn, and others, that he began his reign as
king over earth when
Reu was
163, and that he reigned for 69 years, building
Nisibis, Raha (Edessa)
and
Harran when
Peleg
was 50. It further adds that Nimrod "saw in the sky a piece of
black cloth and a crown; he called Sasan the weaver to his
presence, and commanded him to make him a crown like it; and he
set jewels in it and wore it. He was the first king who wore a
crown. For this reason people who knew nothing about it, said that
a crown came down to him from heaven." Later, the book describes
how Nimrod established fire worship and idolatry, then receives
instruction in divination for 3 years from Bouniter, the
fourth son of Noah[2].
In the Recognitions (R 4.29), one version of the
Clementines, Nimrod is equated with the legendary Assyrian king
Ninus,
who first appears in the Greek historian
Ctesias as the founder of Nineveh. However, in another
version, the Homilies (H 9.4-6), Nimrod is made to be the
same as
Zoroaster.
The
Syriac
Cave of Treasures (ca. 350) contains an account of Nimrod
very similar to that in the Kitab al-Magall, except that
Nisibis, Edessa and Harran are said to be built by Nimrod when Reu
was 50, and that he began his reign as the first king when Reu was
130. In this version, the weaver is called Sisan, and the
fourth son of Noah is called Yonton.
Jerome, writing ca. 390, explains in Hebrew Questions on
Genesis that after Nimrod reigned in Babel, "he also reigned
in Arach [Erech], that is, in Edissa; and in Achad [Accad], which
is now called Nisibis; and in Chalanne [Calneh], which was later
called Seleucia after King Seleucus when its name had been
changed, and which is now in actual fact called Ctesiphon."
However, this traditional identification of the cities built by
Nimrod in Genesis is no longer accepted by modern scholars, who
consider them to be located in Sumer, not Syria.
The
Ge'ez
Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan (ca. 5th century) also
contains a version similar to that in the Cave of Treasures,
but the crown maker is called Santal, and the name of
Noah's fourth son who instructs Nimrod is Barvin.
In the
History of the Prophets and Kings by the 9th century
Muslim historian
al-Tabari, Nimrod has the tower built in Babil, Allah destroys
it, and the language of mankind, formerly
Syriac, is then confused into 72 languages. Another Muslim
historian of the 13th century,
Abu al-Fida relates the same story, adding that the patriarch
Eber
(an ancestor of Abraham) was allowed to keep the original tongue,
Hebrew in this case, because he would not partake in the building.
In
Armenian legend,
Haik, the founder of the Armenian people, defeated Nimrod in
battle near Lake Van.
According to the medieval
Hungarian chronicle
Gesta Hunnorum et Hungarorum, the ancestors of
Huns and
Magyars (Hunor
and Magor, respectively) were the twin sons of Menrot
(son of Tana) and Eneth. In some of the different
versions of this legend (Gesta
Hungarorum,
Chronicon Pictum), Menrot is referred to as
Nimrod, the son of Kush, the "wise and just king" of the "marvellously
beautiful and wealthy city of
Ur"
(where "Ur" is also a Hungarian name for God.) and
Attila the Hun is referred to by the title "Attila, by the
grace of God - son of Bendeguz (Mundzuk),
grandson of the great Nimrod - the king of
Huns,
Medes,
Goths,
Danes, the Fear of World, Scourge of God".
One tradition[who?]
suggests that Nimrod was killed by a wild animal. Another[who?]
says that
Shem killed him because he had led the people into the worship
of Baal.
Then tore his body to pieces and had them sent them out as a
warning to others not to indulge in the false worship. Later his
mother or wife, Shemiramis, collected them, put them together and
claimed he was still alive, but had become a god, similar to the
legend of Isis and Osiris[citation
needed]. Still another mention of Nimrod is
in the
Book of Jasher
Chapter 27:7 , which ascribes his death to
Esau
(grandson of
Abraham), who supposedly beheaded him.
The evil Nimrod vs. the
righteous Abraham
The Bible does not mention any meeting between Nimrod and
Abraham. In fact, there is a gap of seven generations between
them, Nimrod being
Noah's
great grandson while Abraham was ten generations removed from Noah
(Genesis 10,11). Nevertheless, later Jewish tradition brings the
two of them together in a cataclysmic collision, a potent symbol
of the cosmic confrontation between Good and Evil, and
specifically of
Monotheism against
paganism and
idolatry.
This tradition is first attested in the writings of
Pseudo-Philo (van der Toorn and van der Horst 1990, p. 19),
continues in the
Talmud, goes through later rabbinical writings in the Middle
Ages[3],
and is still being added to by contemporary rabbis.[citation
needed]
In some versions - as in Josephus - Nimrod is a man who sets
his will against that of God. In others, he proclaims himself a
god and is worshipped as such by his subjects, sometimes with his
consort
Semiramis worshipped as a goddess at his side. (see also
Ninus)
A portent in the stars tells Nimrod and his astrologers of
the impending birth of Abraham, who would put an end to
idolatry. Nimrod therefore orders the killing of all newborn
babies. However, Abraham's mother escapes into the fields and
gives birth secretly (in some accounts, the baby Abraham is placed
in a manger).
Abraham grows up and already at a young age he recognizes
God and starts worshipping Him. He confronts Nimrod and tells him
face-to-face to cease his idolatry, whereupon Nimrod orders him
burned at the stake. In some versions, Nimrod has his subjects
gather wood for four whole years, so as to burn Abraham in the
biggest bonfire the world had seen (a story possibly inspired or
confused with Nimrod's building of the Tower). Yet when the fire
is lighted, Abraham walks out unscathed.
In some versions, Nimrod then challenges Abraham to battle.
When Nimrod appears at the head of enormous armies, Abraham
produces an army of gnats which destroys Nimrod's army. Some
accounts have a gnat or mosquito enter Nimrod's brain and drive
him out of his mind (a divine retribution which Jewish tradition
also assigned to the Roman Emperor
Titus,
destroyer of the Temple in Jerusalem).
In some versions, Nimrod repents and accepts God, offering
numerous sacrifices that God rejects (as with
Cain). Other versions have Nimrod give to Abraham, as a
reconciliatory gift, the slave
Eliezer, whom some accounts describe as Nimrod's own son. (The
Bible also mentions Eliezer, though not making any connection
between him and Nimrod. He was Abraham's majordomo, entrusted with
missions such as fetching a bride for Abraham's son, and he has
entered Jewish tradition as the archetype of a loyal servant.)
Still other versions have Nimrod persisting in his rebellion
against God, or resuming it. Indeed, Abraham's crucial act of
leaving
Mesopotamia and settling in
Canaan, which effectively sets the stage for the rest of the
Bible, is sometimes interpreted as an escape from Nimrod's
revenge. Some accounts place the building of the Tower many
generations before Abraham's birth (as in the Bible, also
Jubilees). In others, it is a later rebellion after Nimrod
failed in his confrontation with Abraham, and in still other
versions, Nimrod does not give up after the Tower fails, but goes
on to try storming Heaven in person, in a chariot driven by birds.
The story attributes to Abraham elements from the story of
Moses'
birth (the cruel king killing innocent babies, with the midwives
ordered to kill them) and from the careers of
Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego who emerged unscathed from the
fire. Nimrod is thus made to conflate the role and attributes of
two archetypal cruel and persecuting kings -
Nebuchadnezzar and
Pharaoh. Some Jewish traditions also identified him with
Cyrus
whose birth according to
Herodotus was accompanied by portents which made his
grandfather try to kill him.
The same confrontation is also found extensively in the
Islamic
Qur'an, between Namrood, the arch-rebel against Allah's
authority, and the Prophet Ibrahim (Arabic version of "Abraham"),
honoured in Islam as "Allah's khalil", meaning he who
has reached a high state of love for Allah. The Qur'an takes
an even dimmer view of Nimrod than the rabbinic tales. While some
Jewish sources have him repenting in the end of the tale, Muslim
sources usually depict him as obdurate to the bitter end, however
many times his plots were foiled. In Ibrahim's confrontation with
Namrood, the former argues that Allah is the one who gives life
and gives death. Namrood responds by bringing out two people
sentenced to death. He releases one and kills the other as a poor
attempt at making a point that he also brings life and death.
Ibrahim refutes by stating that Allah brings the Sun out from the
East, and so he asks Namrood to bring it from the West. Namrood is
then perplexed and angered. He arranges for Ibrahim to be thrown
into a great fire, but Allah protects him from it by commanding
the fire to be cool and safe for Ibrahim.
Whether or not conceived as having ultimately repented,
Nimrod remained in Jewish and Islamic tradition an emblematic evil
person, an archetype of an idolater and a tyrannical king. In
rabbinical writings up to the present, he is almost invariably
referred to as "Nimrod the Evil"(Hebrew:
נמרוד הרשע), and
to Muslims he is "Nimrod al-Jabbar" (The Tyrant or Thug).
The story of Abraham's confrontation with Nimrod did not
remain within the confines of learned writings and religious
treatises, but also conspicuously influenced popular culture. A
notable example is "Quando el Rey Nimrod" ("When King
Nimrod"), one of the most well-known folksongs in
Ladino, (Judeo-Spanish), apparently written during the reign
of King
Alfonso X of
Castile.
Beginning with the words: "When King Nimrod went out to the
fields/ Looked at the heavens and at the stars/He saw a holy light
in the Jewish quarter/A sign that Abraham, our father, was about
to be born", the song gives a poetic account of the persecutions
perpetrated by the cruel Nimrod and the miraculous birth and deeds
of the savior Abraham[4].
Text of the Midrash Raba Version
The following version of the Abraham vs. Nimrod
confrontation appears in the
Midrash Raba, a major compilation of Jewish Scriptural
exegesis. The part relating to
Genesis, in which this appears (Chapter 38, 13), is considered
to date from the sixth century.
"נטלו ומסרו לנמרוד. אמר לו: עבוד לאש. אמר לו אברהם:
ואעבוד למים, שמכבים את האש? אמר לו נמרוד: עבוד למים! אמר לו:
אם כך, אעבוד לענן, שנושא את המים? אמר לו: עבוד לענן! אמר לו:
אם כך, אעבוד לרוח, שמפזרת עננים? אמר לו: עבוד לרוח! אמר לו:
ונעבוד לבן אדם, שסובל הרוחות? אמר לו: מילים אתה מכביר, אני
איני משתחוה אלא לאוּר - הרי אני משליכך בתוכו, ויבא אלוה שאתה
משתחוה לו ויצילך הימנו! היה שם הרן עומד. אמר: מה נפשך, אם ינצח
אברהם - אומַר 'משל אברהם אני', ואם ינצח נמרוד - אומַר 'משל
נמרוד אני'. כיון שירד אברהם לכבשן האש וניצול, אמרו לו: משל מי
אתה? אמר להם: משל אברהם אני! נטלוהו והשליכוהו לאור, ונחמרו בני
מעיו ויצא ומת על פני תרח אביו. וכך נאמר: וימת הרן על פני תרח
אביו." (בראשית רבה ל"ח, יג)
(...) He [Abraham] was given over to Nimrod. [Nimrod]
told him: Worship the Fire! Abraham said to him: Shall I then
worship the water, which puts off the fire! Nimrod told him:
Worship the water! [Abraham] said to him: If so, shall I
worship the cloud, which carries the water? [Nimrod] told him:
Worship the cloud! [Abraham] said to him: If so, shall I
worship the wind, which scatters the clouds? [Nimrod] said to
him: Worship the wind! [Abraham] said to him: And shall we
worship the human, who withstands the wind? Said [Nimrod] to
him: You pile words upon words, I bow to none but the fire -
in it shall I throw you, and let the God to whom you bow come
and save you from it!
Haran [Abraham's brother] was standing there. He said [to
himself]: what shall I do? If Abraham wins, I shall say: "I am
of Abraham's [followers]", if Nimrod wins I shall say "I am of
Nimrod's [followers]". When Abraham went into the furnace and
survived, Haran was asked: "Whose [follower] are you?" and he
answered: "I am Abraham's!". [Then] they took him and threw
him into the furnace, and his belly opened and he died and
predeceased Terach, his father.
[The
Bible (Genesis
11:28, mentions Haran predeceasing Terach, but gives no
details.]
Interpretations
It is often assumed that Nimrod's reign included war and
terror, and that he was a hunter not only of animals, but also a
person who used aggression against other humans. The Hebrew
translated "before" in the phrase "Mighty hunter before
the LORD" is commonly analysed as meaning
literally "in the Face of" in this interpretation, to suggest a
certain rebelliousness in the establishment of a human government.
Since some of the towns mentioned were in the territory of
Assyria, which is connected to
Shem's
son
Asshur, Nimrod is sometimes speculated to have invaded
territory that did not belong to him. However, various
translations of the Hebrew text leave it ambiguous as to whether
the towns in Assyria were founded by Nimrod or by Asshur.
Inscription of Naram Sin found at the city of
Marad
Historians and mythographers have long tried to find links
between Nimrod and figures from other traditions.
Marduk (Merodach), has been suggested as a possible archetype
for Nimrod, especially at the beginning of the 20th century.[citation
needed] Nimrod's imperial ventures described
in Genesis may be based on the conquests of the
Assyrian king
Tukulti-Ninurta I (Dalley et al., 1998, p. 67).
Alexander Hislop, in his tract
The Two Babylons (Chapter
2, Section II, Sub-Section I) decided that Nimrod was to be
identified with
Ninus,
who according to
Greek legend was a
Mesopotamian king and husband of
Semiramis (see below); with a whole host of deities throughout
the
Mediterranean world, and with the Persian
Zoroaster. The identification with Ninus follows that of the
Clementine Recognitions; the one with Zoroaster, that of
the Clementine Homilies, both works part of
Clementine literature. [5] Ninus (and Venus
presumed to be his great mother Queen Semiramis) ruled Nineveh in
1269 BC, but Greeks placed Ninus as 52 years of 2060-2009 BC
(Abram's birth being year 43 of 52) in Eusebius.
David Rohl, like Hislop, identified Nimrod with a complex of
Mediterranean deities; among those he picked were
Asar,
Baal,
Dumuzi and
Osiris. In Rohl's theory,
Enmerkar the founder of
Uruk
was the original inspiration for Nimrod, because the story of
Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta (see:
[4]) bears a few similarities to the legend of Nimrod and the
Tower of Babel, and because the -KAR in Enmerkar means "hunter".
Additionally, Enmerkar is said to have had ziggurats built in both
Uruk and
Eridu,
which Rohl postulates was the site of the original Babel.
Because another of the cities said to have been built by
Nimrod was Accad, a+n older theory connects him with
Sargon the Great, grandfather of Naram-Sin, since, according
to the
Sumerian king list, that king first built Agade (Akkad). The
assertion of the king list that it was Sargon who built Akkad has
been called into question, however, with the discovery of
inscriptions mentioning the place in the reigns of some of
Sargon's predecessors, such as kings
Enshakushanna and
Lugal-Zage-Si of Uruk. Nimrod is the son of Cush (founder of
the city Kish) who is the son of Ham in Ararat (thus Nimrod is
grandson of Ham). Sargon is the grandson of Purzur-Sin being that
he is the son of Ur-Zababa, who is the son of Puzur-Sin, the son
of the woman Ku-Baba of Ararat (daughter of Noah's vineyard).
Nimrod figures in some very early versions of the history of
Freemasonry, where he was said to have been one of the
fraternity's founders. According to the Encyclopedia of
Freemasonry: The legend of the Craft in the Old Constitutions
refers to Nimrod as one of the founders of Masonry. Thus in the
York MS., No. 1, we read: "At ye making of ye toure of Babell
there was a Masonrie first much esteemed of, and the King of
Babilon yt called Nimrod was a Mason himself and loved well
Masons." However, he does not figure in the current rituals.
8 Cush
fathered Nimrod, who was the first powerful man on earth.
9 He was a
powerful hunter in the sight of the LORD.
That is why it is said, "Like Nimrod, a powerful hunter in the sight
of the LORD."
10 His
kingdom started with Babylon,
(A)
Erech,
[a] Accad,
[b] and
Calneh,
[c] in the
land of Shinar.
(B)
[d]11 From that
land he went to Assyria
(C)
and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-ir, Calah,
12 and Resen,
between Nineveh and the great city Calah.
9
Therefore its name is called Babylon,
(A)
[a]
for there the LORD
confused the language of the whole earth, and from there
the LORD
scattered them over the face of the whole earth.
1 In
those days Amraphel king of Shinar,
Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam,
and
Tidal
king of Goiim
Genesis
14:1 A region in southwest Iran
Genesis
14:1 The name Tidal may be related to the
Hittite royal name Tudhaliya.
6
They will shepherd
the land of Assyria with the sword,
the land of Nimrod
with a drawn blade.
So He will rescue us
from Assyria
when it invades our land,
when it marches against our territory.
4 000 BC -
Nimrod was also a descendent of
Noah. The bible is silent on the time-frame of the
building of the "tower" of Babel, but conservative
bible scholars have placed it between 3500 and 4000 BC
It could have been much earlier than this, and then
again, much later.According
to the biblical account, the "tower" was built during
the reign of "King Nimrod", the first "King" of
Babylon.
Nimrod was also a descendent of
Noah. The bible is silent on the time-frame of the
building of the "tower" of Babel, but conservative
bible scholars have placed it between 3500 and 4000 BC
It could have been much earlier than this, and then
again, much later.
2348 BC -
Civilizations that could not have existed until
after the Tower of Babel, are routinely dated at
1000 or more years before the global Flood in
2348 BC, to which my reply is, ‘how long can you
tread water!?’ Time texts in the Bible are the
main point of Satan’s ...Civilizations
that could not have existed until after the
Tower of Babel, are routinely dated at 1000 or
more years before the global Flood in 2348 BC,
to which my reply is, ‘how long can you tread
water!?’ Time texts in the Bible are the main
point of Satan’s attack on the authority of the
Scriptures. Whether they are in Genesis 1,
Kings, Luke or elsewhere,
2188 BC - THE
natives of Africa are supposed to be descended
from Noah't •on
Ham, who went thither and settled in
Egypt after the building of the tower of
Babel, this country being near the land of
Shinar, The kingdom of Egypt is very ancient,
and was founded by Menes one ...THE
natives of Africa are supposed to be descended
from Noah't •on
Ham, who went thither and settled in
Egypt after the building of the tower of
Babel, this country being near the land of
Shinar, The kingdom of Egypt is very ancient,
and was founded by Menes one of the children of
Ham, 2188 BC In the Bible he is called Misraim.
2. Egypt is bounded north by the Mediterranean
Sea, east by th« Red Sea, south by Nubia, and
west by the desert.
600 BC - Many Jews
would have seen it with their own eyes when they
were deported to Babylon in about 600 BC. This
would have no doubt reminded them of the events
at the Tower of Babel. The Bible reveals very
little about the ziggurat. There are other
sources outside of ...Babylon
in the time of Nebuchadnezzar II was large even
by our standards. In the city they would see the
ziggurat, which would seem to them, usually
living in single story houses, to reach almost
to heaven. Many Jews would have seen it with
their own eyes when they were deported to
Babylon in about 600 BC. This would have no
doubt reminded them of the events at the Tower
of Babel. The Bible reveals very little about
the ziggurat.
The Tower of Babel (Hebrew:
מגדל בבל Migdal
Bavel
Arabic: برج بابل Burj
Babil) according to chapter 11 of the
Book of Genesis, was an enormous
tower
built at the city of
Babel,
the Hebrew name for
Babylon (AkkadianBabilu). According to the biblical account, a united
humanity, speaking a single language and migrating from the
east, took part in the building after the
Great Flood; Babel was also called the "beginning" of
Nimrod's kingdom. The people decided their city should have a
tower so immense that it would have "its top in the
heavens."(וְרֹאשׁוֹ בַשָּׁמַיִם) However, the Tower of Babel was
not built for the worship and praise of God, but was dedicated to
the glory of man, with a motive of making a 'name' for the
builders: "Then they said, 'Come, let us build ourselves a city,
and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name
for ourselves; otherwise we shall be scattered abroad upon the
face of the whole earth.'" (Genesis 11:4). God, seeing what the
people were doing, confounded their languages and scattered the
people throughout the earth. It had been God's original purpose
for mankind to grow and fill the earth. In the Hebrew scriptures
Nimrod is portrayed as a 'mighty hunter'
1 And the
whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
2 And it came to pass, as
they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the
land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
3 And they said one to
another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And
they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar.
4 And they said, Go to, let
us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven;
and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the
face of the whole earth. 5
And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the
children built. 6
And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all
one language; and this they begin to do; and now nothing will be
restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
7 Go to, let us go down,
and there confound their language, that they may not understand
one another's speech. 8
So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of
all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
9 Therefore is the name of
it called Babel; because the Lord did there confound the
language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter
them abroad upon the face of all the earth.
The phrase Tower of Babel does not actually appear in
the Bible; it is always, "the city and its tower" (אֶת-הָעִיר
וְאֶת-הַמִּגְדָּל) or just "the city" (הָעִיר).
Themes
The story explains the origin of nations, of their
languages, and of Babylon (Babel). The story's theme of
competition between the Lord and humans appears elsewhere in
Genesis, in the story of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.[1]
The story displays the Lord's contempt for human pride.[1]
The traditional Judaeo-Christian interpretation, as found
for example in
Flavius Josephus, explains the construction of the tower as a
hubristic act of defiance against God, ordered by the arrogant
tyrant,
Nimrod.
The Greek form of the name is from the native
AkkadianBāb-ilim, which means "Gate of the god". This
correctly summarizes the religious purpose of the great temple
towers (the
ziggurats) of ancient
Sumer
(Biblical
Shinar). In Genesis 10, Babel is said to have formed part of
Nimrod's kingdom. It is not specifically mentioned in the
Bible that he ordered the tower to be built, but Nimrod is often
associated with its construction in other sources. The
Hebrew version of the name of the city and the tower, Babel,
is attributed in Gen. 11:9 to the verb balal, which means
to confuse or confound in Hebrew. The ruins of the city of
Babylon are near
Hillah,
Babil Governorate,
Iraq.
The peoples listed in Chapter 10 of Genesis (the
Table of Nations) are stated by 11:8-9 to have been scattered
over the face of the earth from Shinar only after the abandonment
of the Tower. Some see an internal
contradiction between the mention already in Genesis 10:5 that
"From these the maritime peoples spread out into their territories
by their clans within their nations, each with his own language"
and the subsequent Babel story, which begins "Now the entire earth
was of one language and uniform words" (Genesis 11:1).[2]
However, this view presupposes a rigid chronological sequence of
10:5 and 11:1, whereas the Judeo-Christian interpretation is that
10:5 refers to the same later scattering as mentioned more fully
in 11:9.
Destruction
The account in Genesis makes no mention of any destruction
of the tower. The people whose languages are confounded simply
stop building their city, and are scattered from there over the
face of the Earth. However, in other sources such as the
Book of Jubilees,
Cornelius Alexander (frag. 10),
Abydenus (frags. 5 and 6),
Josephus (Antiquities 1.4.3), and the
Sibylline Oracles (iii. 117-129), God overturns the tower
with a great wind.
Etemenanki, the ziggurat at Babylon
Reconstruction of the Etemenanki (total height 91 m)
Etemenanki (Sumerian: "temple of the foundation of heaven
and earth") was the name of a ziggurat dedicated to Marduk in the
city of Babylon. It was famously rebuilt by the 6th century BC
Neo-Babylonian dynasty rulers
Nabopolassar and
Nebuchadnezzar II. According to modern scholars such as
Stephen L. Harris, the biblical story of the Tower of Babel was
likely influenced by Etemenanki during the Babylonian captivity of
the Hebrews.
Nebuchadnezzar wrote that the original tower had been built
in antiquity: "A former king built the Temple of the Seven Lights
of the Earth, but he did not complete its head. Since a remote
time, people had abandoned it, without order expressing their
words. Since that time earthquakes and lightning had dispersed its
sun-dried clay; the bricks of the casing had split, and the earth
of the interior had been scattered in heaps."
The Greek historian
Herodotus (440 BC) later wrote of this ziggurat, which he
called the "Temple of Zeus Belus", giving an account of its vast
dimensions.
Book of Jubilees
The
Book of Jubilees contains one of the most detailed
accounts found anywhere of the Tower.
And they began to build, and in the fourth week they made
brick with fire, and the bricks served them for stone, and the
clay with which they cemented them together was asphalt which
comes out of the sea, and out of the fountains of water in the
land of Shinar. And they built it: forty and three years were
they building it; its breadth was 203 bricks, and the height [of
a brick] was the third of one; its height amounted to 5433
cubits and 2 palms, and [the extent of one wall was]
thirteen
stades [and of the other thirty stades]. (Jubilees 10:20-21,
Charles' 1913 translation)
The Book of Jubilees recounts Genesis and the
first twelve chapters of
Exodus, elaborating on the text (similar to a
Midrash). It is often categorized as one of the
Pseudepigrapha and dated to the late 2nd century BC[1],
but it is still in the canon of the
Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church[3].
Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews
The Jewish historian
Flavius Josephus, in his
Antiquities of the Jews (c 94 AD), recounted history as
found in the
Hebrew Bible and mentioned the Tower of Babel. He wrote that
it was Nimrod who had the tower built and that Nimrod was a tyrant
who tried to turn the people away from God. In this account, God
confused the people rather than destroying them because destroying
people with a Flood hadn't taught them to be godly.
Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and
contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a
bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not
to ascribe it to God, as if it were through his means they were
happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which
procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the
government into
tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of
God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his
power... Now the multitude were very ready to follow the
determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice
to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any
pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by
reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very
high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it
was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its
great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really
was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar,
made of
bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When
God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy
them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction
of the former sinners [in the Flood]; but he caused a tumult
among them, by producing in them diverse languages, and causing
that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not
be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built
the tower is now called
Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which
they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word
Babel,
confusion...
Greek Apocalypse of Baruch
Third Apocalypse of Baruch (or 3 Baruch, c 2nd
century), one of the
pseudepigrapha, describes the just rewards of sinners and the
righteous in the afterlife.[1]
Among the sinners are those who instigated the Tower of Babel. In
the account, Baruch is first taken (in a vision) to see the
resting place of the souls of "those who built the tower of strife
against God, and the Lord banished them." Next he is shown another
place, and there, occupying the form of dogs,
Those who gave counsel to build the tower, for they whom
thou seest drove forth multitudes of both men and women, to make
bricks; among whom, a woman making bricks was not allowed to be
released in the hour of child-birth, but brought forth while she
was making bricks, and carried her child in her apron, and
continued to make bricks. And the Lord appeared to them and
confused their speech, when they had built the tower to the
height of four hundred and sixty-three cubits. And they took a
gimlet, and sought to pierce the heavens, saying, Let us see
(whether) the heaven is made of clay, or of brass, or of iron.
When God saw this He did not permit them, but smote them with
blindness and confusion of speech, and rendered them as thou
seest. (Greek Apocalypse of Baruch, 3:5-8)
Midrash
Rabbinic literature offers many different accounts of other
causes for building the Tower of
Babel,
and of the intentions of its builders. The
Mishnah (the first written record of the Jewish
Oral Law, c 200 AD) describes the Tower as a rebellion
against God. Some later
midrash record that the builders of the Tower, called "the
generation of secession" in the Jewish sources, said: "God has no
right to choose the upper world for Himself, and to leave the
lower world to us; therefore we will build us a tower, with an
idol on the top holding a sword, so that it may appear as if it
intended to war with God" (Gen. R. xxxviii. 7; Tan., ed. Buber,
Noah, xxvii. et seq.).
The building of the Tower was meant to bid defiance not only
to God, but also to
Abraham, who exhorted the builders to reverence. The passage
mentions that the builders spoke sharp words against God, not
cited in the Bible, saying that once every 1,656 years, heaven
tottered so that the water poured down upon the earth, therefore
they would support it by columns that there might not be another
deluge (Gen. R. l.c.; Tan. l.c.; similarly Josephus, "Ant." i. 4,
§ 2).
Some among that sinful generation even wanted to war against
God in heaven (Talmud Sanhedrin 109a.) They were encouraged in
this wild undertaking by the notion that arrows which they shot
into the sky fell back dripping with blood, so that the people
really believed that they could wage war against the inhabitants
of the heavens (Sefer
ha-Yashar, Noah, ed. Leghorn, 12b). According to
Josephus and Midrash Pirke R. El. xxiv., it was mainly
Nimrod who persuaded his contemporaries to build the Tower,
while other rabbinical sources assert, on the contrary, that
Nimrod separated from the builders.
Kabbalah
Some
Kabbalistic mystics provide intriguing and unusual
descriptions of the Tower of Babel. According to Menachem Tsioni,
an Italian Torah commentator of 15th century, the Tower was a
functional flying craft, empowered by some powerful magic or
technology [4]; the device was
originally intended for holy purposes, but was later misused in
order to gain control over the whole world.
Isaac of Acre wrote that the Tower builders had reached, or at
least planned to reach the distance of 2,360,000,000
parsas or 9-10 billion kilometers above the Earth surface,
which is about the radius of the
Solar System, including most
Trans-Neptunian objects.
[5]. Similar accounts are
also found in the writing of
Jonathan Eybeschutz and the ancient book Brith Menuchah[6], according to which the
builders of the Tower planned to equip it with some shield
technology ("shielding wings") and powerful weapons. Many
Kabbalists believed that the ancient peoples possessed magic
knowledge of the
Nephilim, which allowed them to construct such powerful
devices. Moreover, according to some commentaries, some
Talmudic sages possessed a manual for building such a flying
tower.
These accounts coincide with some of
Zecharia Sitchin's speculations and the
ufological theories concerning the ancient Indian
vimanas[citation
needed]. According to another mysterious
Kabbalistic account, one third of the Tower builders were punished
by turning into various semi-demonic creatures and banished into
three parallel dimensions, inhabited now by their descendants
[7].
Qur'an and Islamic traditions
Though not mentioned by name, the
Qur'an has a story with similarities to the Biblical story of
the Tower of Babel, though set in the Egypt of Moses. In Suras
28:38 and 40:36-37
Pharaoh asks
Haman to build him a clay tower so that he can mount up to
heaven and confront the
God of
Moses.
Another story in Sura 2:102 mentions the name of
Babil, but tells of when two angels taught the people of
Babylon the tricks of magic and warned them that magic is a sin
and that their teaching them magic is a test of faith. A tale
about Babil appears more fully in the writings of
Yaqut (i, 448 f.) and the
Lisan el-'Arab (xiii. 72), but without the tower: mankind
were swept together by winds into the plain that was afterwards
called "Babil", where they were assigned their separate languages
by Allah, and were then scattered again in the same way.
In the
History of the Prophets and Kings by the 9th century
Muslim historian
al-Tabari, a fuller version is given: Nimrod has the tower
built in Babil, Allah destroys it, and the language of mankind,
formerly
Syriac, is then confused into 72 languages. Another Muslim
historian of the 13th century,
Abu al-Fida relates the same story, adding that the patriarch
Eber
(an ancestor of Abraham) was allowed to keep the original tongue,
Hebrew in this case, because he would not partake in the building.
There is a
Sumerian myth similar to that of the Tower of Babel, called
Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta, where
Enmerkar of
Uruk
is building a massive ziggurat in
Eridu
and demands a tribute of precious materials from
Aratta for its construction, at one point reciting an
incantation imploring the god
Enki
to restore (or in Kramer's translation, to disrupt) the linguistic
unity of the inhabited regions — named as
Shubur,
Hamazi, Sumer,
Uri-ki (Akkad), and the
Martu land, "the whole universe, the well-guarded people — may
they all address Enlil together in a single language."[9]
One recent theory first advanced by
David Rohl associates Nimrod, the hunter, builder of Erech and
Babel, with Enmerkar (i.e., Enmer the Hunter) king of
Uruk,
also said to have been the first builder of the
Eridu
temple. (Amar-Sin
(c. 2046–2037 BC), third monarch of the
Third Dynasty of Ur, later attempted to complete the Eridu
ziggurat.) This theory proposes that the remains of the historical
building that via Mesopotamian legend inspired the story of the
Tower of Babel are the ruins of the ziggurat of
Eridu,
just south of
Ur. Among the reasons for this association are the larger size
of the ruins, the older age of the ruins, and the fact that one
title of Eridu was NUN.KI
("mighty place"), which later became a title of Babylon[10].
Both cities also had temples called the
E-Sagila.
Towers
Various traditions similar to that of the tower of Babel are
found in
Central America. One holds that
Xelhua, one of the seven giants rescued from the deluge, built
the
Great Pyramid of Cholula in order to storm Heaven. The gods
destroyed it with fire and confounded the language of the
builders. The
Dominican friar
Diego Duran (1537-1588) reported hearing this account from a
hundred-year-old priest at Cholula, shortly after the conquest of
Mexico.
Another story, attributed by the native historian Don
Ferdinand d'Alva Ixtilxochitl (c. 1565-1648) to the ancient
Toltecs, states that after men had multiplied following a
great deluge, they erected a tall zacuali or tower, to
preserve themselves in the event of a second deluge. However,
their languages were confounded and they went to separate parts of
the earth.
Still another story, attributed to the
Tohono O'odham Indians, holds that
Montezuma escaped a great flood, then became wicked and
attempted to build a house reaching to heaven, but the Great
Spirit destroyed it with thunderbolts. (Bancroft,
vol. 3, p.76; also in
History of Arizona)
According to
Dr Livingstone, the
Africans whom he met living near
Lake Ngami in 1849 had such a tradition, but with the
builders' heads getting "cracked by the fall of the scaffolding" (Missionary
Travels, chap. 26).
In his 1918 book,
Folklore in the Old Testament, Scottish social anthropologist
Sir
James George Frazer documented similarities between Old
Testament stories, such as the Flood, and indigenous legends
around the world. He identified Livingston's account with a tale
found in
Lozi mythology, wherein the wicked men build a tower of masts
to pursue the Creator-God, Nyambe, who has fled to Heaven on a
spider-web, but the men perish when the masts collapse. He further
relates similar tales of the
Ashanti that substitute a pile of porridge pestles for the
masts. Frazer moreover cites such legends found among the
Kongo people, as well as in
Tanzania, where the men stack poles or trees in a failed
attempt to reach the moon [11]. He further cited the
Karbi
and
Kuki people of
Assam
as having a similar story. The traditions of the
Karen people of
Myanmar, which Frazer considered to show clear 'Abrahamic'
influence, also relate that their ancestors migrated there
following the abandonment of a great
pagoda in the land of the
Karenni 30 generations from Adam, when the languages were
confused and the Karen separated from the Karenni. He notes yet
another version current in the
Admiralty Islands where mankind's languages are confused
following a failed attempt to build houses reaching to heaven.
Some of these stories were later revealed to have derived recently
from Christian missionary teaching.
Traces of a somewhat similar story have also been reported
among the
Tharus of
Nepal
and northern
India
(Report of the Census of Bengal, 1872, p. 160).
Multiplication of languages
There have also been a number of traditions around the world
that describe a divine confusion of the one original language into
several, albeit without any tower. Aside from the Ancient Greek
myth that
Hermes confused the languages, causing Zeus to give his throne
to
Phoroneus, Frazer specifically mentions such accounts among
the Wasania of
Kenya,
the Kacha
Naga people of Assam, the inhabitants of
Encounter Bay in Australia, the
Maidu
of California, the
Tlingit of Alaska, and the
K'iche' of Guatemala [12].
Height of the tower
The narrative in the book of Genesis does not mention how
tall the Biblical tower was, but the tower's height is discussed
in various extra-canonical sources.
The Book of Jubilees mentions the tower's height as
being 5433
cubits
and 2 palms, or nearly 2.5 kilometers (about 1.55 miles). The
Third Apocalypse of Baruch mentions that the 'tower of strife'
reached a height of 463
cubits
(696 feet or 212 meters), taller than any structure built in human
history until the construction of the
Eiffel Tower (1,063 feet or 324 meters) in 1889.
Gregory of Tours (I, 6) writing ca. 594, quotes the earlier
historian
Orosius (ca. 417) as saying the tower was "laid out foursquare
on a very level plain. Its wall, made of baked brick cemented with
pitch, is fifty
cubits wide, two hundred high, and four hundred and seventy
stades in
circumference. A stade contains five
agripennes. Twenty-five
gates
are situated on each side, which make in all one hundred. The
doors of these gates, which are of wonderful size, are cast in
bronze. The same historian [Orosius] tells many other tales of
this city, and says: 'Although such was the glory of its building
still it was conquered and destroyed.'"
A typical mediaeval account is given by
Giovanni Villani (1300): He relates that "it measured eighty
miles round, and it was already 4,000
paces high (5,920 m (19,423 ft)) and 1,000 paces thick, and
each pace is three of our feet."
[14]. The 14th century
traveler
John Mandeville also included an account of the tower, and
reported that its height had been 64
furlongs (= 8 miles), according to the local inhabitants.
The 17th century historian
Verstegan provides yet another figure - quoting Isidore, he
says that the tower was 5164 paces high, about 7.6 kilometers, and
quoting Josephus that the tower was wider than it was high, more
like a mountain than a tower. He also quotes unnamed authors who
say that the spiral path was so wide that it contained lodgings
for workers and animals, and other authors who claim that the path
was wide enough to have fields for growing
grain for the animals used in the construction.
In his book, Structures or why things don't fall down
(Pelican 1978–1984), Professor J.E. Gordon considers the height of
the Tower of Babel. He wrote, 'brick and stone weigh about 120 lb
per
cubic foot (2000 kg per cubic metre) and the crushing strength
of these materials is generally rather better than 6000 lbf per
square inch or 40 megapascals. Elementary arithmetic shows that a
tower with parallel walls could have been built to a height of
7000 feet or 2 kilometres before the bricks at the bottom were
crushed. However by making the walls taper towards the top they
... could well have been built to a height where the men of
Shinnar would run short of oxygen and had difficulty in breathing
before the brick walls crushed beneath their own dead weight."
Enumeration of scattered languages
There are several mediaeval historiographic accounts that
attempt to make an enumeration of the languages scattered at the
Tower of Babel. Because a count of all the
descendants of Noah listed by name in chapter 10 of Genesis (LXX)
provides 15 names for Japheth's descendants, 30 for Ham's, and 27
for Shem's, these figures became established as the 72 languages
resulting from the confusion at Babel — although the exact listing
of these languages tended to vary over time. (The LXX Bible has
two additional names, Elisa and Cainan, not found in the Masoretic
text of this chapter, so early rabbinic traditions such as the
Mishna speak instead of "70 languages".) Some of the earliest
sources for 72 (sometimes 73) languages are the 2nd century
Christian writers
Clement of Alexandria (Stromata
I, 21) and
Hippolytus of Rome (On the Psalms 9); it is repeated in
the
Syriac book
Cave of Treasures (c. AD 350),
Epiphanius of Salamis'
Panarion (c. 375) and
St. Augustine's
The City of God 16.6 (c. 410). The chronicles attributed
to Hippolytus (c. 234) contain one of the first attempts to list
each of the 72 peoples who were believed to have spoken these
languages.
The tradition of 72 languages persisted into later times.
Both
José de Acosta in his 1576 treatise De procuranda indorum
salute, and
António Vieira a century later in his Sermão da Epifania,
expressed amazement at how much this 'number of tongues' could be
surpassed, there being hundreds of mutually unintelligible
languages indigenous only to Peru and Brazil, respectively.
15The LORD, the God of their
ancestors, sent word to them through
his messengers again and again,
because he had pity on his people
and on his dwelling place.
16 But
they mocked God's messengers,
despised his words and scoffed at
his prophets until the wrath of the
LORD was aroused against his people
and there was no remedy.
17 He
brought up against them the king of
the Babylonians,
[a]
who killed their young men with the
sword in the sanctuary, and spared
neither young man nor young woman,
the elderly or the aged. God gave
them all into the hands of
Nebuchadnezzar.
18 He
carried to Babylon all the articles
from the temple of God, both large
and small, and the treasures of the
LORD's temple and the treasures of
the king and his officials.
19
They set fire to God's temple and
broke down the wall of Jerusalem;
they burned all the palaces and
destroyed everything of value there.
20
He carried into exile to Babylon the
remnant, who escaped from the sword,
and they became servants to him and
his successors until the kingdom of
Persia came to power.
21 The
land enjoyed its sabbath rests; all
the time of its desolation it
rested, until the seventy years were
completed in fulfillment of the word
of the LORD spoken by Jeremiah.
1 One
of the seven angels who had the seven bowls
came and said to me, "Come, I will show you
the punishment of the great prostitute, who
sits by many waters.
2 With her the kings of the earth
committed adultery, and the inhabitants of
the earth were intoxicated with the wine of
her adulteries."
3 Then
the angel carried me away in the Spirit into
a wilderness. There I saw a woman sitting on
a scarlet beast that was covered with
blasphemous names and had seven heads and
ten horns. 4
The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet,
and was glittering with gold, precious
stones and pearls. She held a golden cup in
her hand, filled with abominable things and
the filth of her adulteries.
5 This title
was written on her forehead:
MYSTERY
BABYLON THE GREAT
THE MOTHER OF PROSTITUTES
AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
6 I saw
that the woman was drunk with the blood of
God's people, the blood of those who bore
testimony to Jesus.
When I saw her, I was greatly
astonished. 7
Then the angel said to me: "Why are you
astonished? I will explain to you the
mystery of the woman and of the beast she
rides, which has the seven heads and ten
horns. 8 The
beast, which you saw, once was, now is not,
and will come up out of the Abyss and go to
its destruction. The inhabitants of the
earth whose names have not been written in
the book of life from the creation of the
world will be astonished when they see the
beast, because it once was, now is not, and
yet will come.
9 "This
calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven
heads are seven hills on which the woman
sits. 10 They
are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one
is, the other has not yet come; but when he
does come, he must remain for a little
while. 11 The
beast who once was, and now is not, is an
eighth king. He belongs to the seven and is
going to his destruction.
12 "The
ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not
yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour
will receive authority as kings along with
the beast. 13
They have one purpose and will give their
power and authority to the beast.
14 They will
make war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will
triumph over them because he is Lord of
lords and King of kings—and with him will be
his called, chosen and faithful followers."
15 Then
the angel said to me, "The waters you saw,
where the prostitute sits, are peoples,
multitudes, nations and languages.
16 The beast
and the ten horns you saw will hate the
prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and
leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and
burn her with fire.
17 For God has put it into their
hearts to accomplish his purpose by agreeing
to give the beast their power to rule, until
God's words are fulfilled.
18 The woman
you saw is the great city that rules over
the kings of the earth."
1 After this I
saw another angel coming down from heaven. He had
great authority, and the earth was illuminated by his
splendor. 2 With a
mighty voice he shouted:
" 'Fallen! Fallen is Babylon the Great!'
[a]
She has become a dwelling for demons
and a haunt for every evil
[b]
spirit,
a haunt for every unclean bird,
a haunt for every unclean and detestable
animal.
3 For all the
nations have drunk
the maddening wine of her adulteries.
The kings of the earth committed adultery with
her,
and the merchants of the earth grew rich from
her excessive luxuries."
Warning to Escape Babylon's Judgment
4 Then I heard
another voice from heaven say:
" 'Come out of her, my people,'
[c]
so that you will not share in her sins,
so that you will not receive any of her
plagues;
5 for her sins
are piled up to heaven,
and God has remembered her crimes.
6 Give back to
her as she has given;
pay her back double for what she has done.
Pour her a double portion from her own cup.
7Give her as
much torment and grief
as the glory and luxury she gave herself.
In her heart she boasts,
'I sit enthroned as queen.
I am not a widow;
[d]
I will never mourn.'
8 Therefore in
one day her plagues will overtake her:
death, mourning and famine.
She will be consumed by fire,
for mighty is the Lord God who judges her.
Threefold Woe Over Babylon's Fall
9"When the kings
of the earth who committed adultery with her and
shared her luxury see the smoke of her burning, they
will weep and mourn over her.
10 Terrified at her torment, they will stand far
off and cry:
" 'Woe! Woe to you, great city,
you mighty city of Babylon!
In one hour your doom has come!'
11 "The merchants
of the earth will weep and mourn over her because no
one buys their cargoes anymore—
12 cargoes of gold,
silver, precious stones and pearls; fine linen,
purple, silk and scarlet cloth; every sort of citron
wood, and articles of every kind made of ivory, costly
wood, bronze, iron and marble;
13 cargoes of cinnamon and spice, of incense,
myrrh and frankincense, of wine and olive oil, of fine
flour and wheat; cattle and sheep; horses and
carriages; and human beings sold as slaves.
14 "They will
say, 'The fruit you longed for is gone from you. All
your luxury and splendor have vanished, never to be
recovered.' 15 The
merchants who sold these things and gained their
wealth from her will stand far off, terrified at her
torment. They will weep and mourn
16 and cry out:
" 'Woe! Woe to you, great city,
dressed in fine linen, purple and scarlet,
and glittering with gold, precious stones and
pearls!
17 In one hour
such great wealth has been brought to ruin!'
"Every sea captain, and all who travel by ship,
the sailors, and all who earn their living from the
sea, will stand far off. 18
When they see the smoke of her burning, they will
exclaim, 'Was there ever a city like this great city?'
19 They will throw dust
on their heads, and with weeping and mourning cry out:
" 'Woe! Woe to you, great city,
where all who had ships on the sea
became rich through her wealth!
In one hour she has been brought to ruin!'
20 "Rejoice over
her, you heavens!
Rejoice, you people of God!
Rejoice, apostles and prophets!
For God has judged her
with the judgment she imposed on you."
The Finality of Babylon's Doom
21Then a mighty
angel picked up a boulder the size of a large
millstone and threw it into the sea, and said:
"With such violence
the great city of Babylon will be thrown down,
never to be found again.
22 The music of
harpists and musicians, pipers and trumpeters,
will never be heard in you again.
No worker of any trade
will ever be found in you again.
The sound of a millstone
will never be heard in you again.
23 The light of a
lamp
will never shine in you again.
The voice of bridegroom and bride
will never be heard in you again.
Your merchants were the world's important
people.
By your magic spell all the nations were led
astray.
24 In her was
found the blood of prophets and of God's people,
of all who have been slaughtered on the earth."
Babylon was a
city-state of ancient
Mesopotamia, sometimes considered an
empire, the remains of which can be found in present-day
Al Hillah,
Babil Province,
Iraq,
about 85 kilometers (55 mi) south of
Baghdad. All that remains today of the ancient famed city of
Babylon is a mound, or
tell,
of broken mud-brick buildings and debris in the fertile
Mesopotamian plain between the
Tigris and
Euphrates rivers, in Iraq. Historical resources inform us that
Babylon was at first a small town, that had sprung up by the
beginning of the third millennium BC (the dawn of the dynasties).
The town flourished and attained prominence and political repute
with the rise of the first Babylonian dynasty. It was the "holy
city" of
Babylonia by approximately 2300 BC, and the seat of the
Neo-Babylonian Empire from 612 BC. The
Hanging Gardens of Babylon were one of the
Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.
The form Babylon is the Greek variant of
Akkadian Babilu (bāb-ilû,
meaning "Gateway of the god(s)", translating
Sumerian Ka.dingir.ra).
In the
Hebrew Bible, the name appears as בבל (Babel),
interpreted by
Book of Genesis 11:9 to mean "confusion" (of languages),
from the verb balbal, "to confuse".
History
The earliest source to mention Babylon may be a dated tablet
of the reign of
Sargon of Akkad (ca. 24th century BC
short chronology). The so-called "Weidner Chronicle" states
that it was Sargon himself who built Babylon "in front of
Akkad" (ABC 19:51). Another chronicle likewise states that
Sargon "dug up the dirt of the pit of Babylon, and made a
counterpart of Babylon next to Agade". (ABC 20:18-19).
Some scholars, including linguist
I.J. Gelb, have suggested that the name Babil is an
echo of an earlier city name. According to Dr. Ranajit Pal, this
city was in the East[1].
Herzfeld wrote about Bawer in Iran, which was allegedly
founded by Jamshid; the name Babil could be an echo of
Bawer.
David Rohl holds that the original Babylon is to be identified
with
Eridu.
The Bible in
Genesis 10 indicates that
Nimrod was the original founder of
Babel
(Babylon). Joan Oates claims in her book Babylon that the
rendering "Gateway of the gods" is no longer accepted by modern
scholars.
Over the years, the power and population of Babylon waned.
From around the 20th century BC, it was occupied by
Amorites, nomadic tribes from the west who were Semitic
speakers like the Akkadians, but did not practice agriculture like
them, preferring to herd sheep.
Map showing the Babylonian territory upon Hammurabi's
ascension in 1792 BC and upon his death in 1750 BC
Old Babylonian period
The
First Babylonian Dynasty was established by Sumu-abum, but the
city-state controlled little surrounding territory until it became
the capital of
Hammurabi's empire (ca. 18th century BC). Subsequently, the
city continued to be the capital of the region known as Babylonia
— although during the almost 400 years of domination by the
Kassites (1530–1155 BC), the city was renamed
Karanduniash.
Hammurabi is also known for codifying the laws of Babylonia
into the
Code of Hammurabi that has had a lasting influence on
legal thought.
The city itself was built upon the
Euphrates, and divided in equal parts along its left and right
banks, with steep embankments to contain the river's seasonal
floods. Babylon grew in extent and grandeur over time, but
gradually became subject to the rule of
Assyria.
It has been estimated that Babylon was the largest city in
the world from ca. 1770 to 1670 BC, and again between ca. 612 and
320 BC. It was perhaps the first city to reach a population above
200,000.[2]
Detail of the Ishtar Gate
Assyrian period
During the reign of
Sennacherib of Assyria, Babylonia was in a constant state of
revolt, led by
Mushezib-Marduk, and suppressed only by the complete
destruction of the city of Babylon. In 689 BC, its walls, temples
and palaces were razed, and the rubble was thrown into the
Arakhtu, the sea bordering the earlier Babylon on the south.
This act shocked the religious conscience of Mesopotamia; the
subsequent murder of Sennacherib was held to be in expiation of
it, and his successor
Esarhaddon hastened to rebuild the old city, to receive there
his crown, and make it his residence during part of the year. On
his death, Babylonia was left to be governed by his elder son
Shamash-shum-ukin, who eventually headed a revolt in 652 BC
against his brother in Nineveh,
Assurbanipal.
Once again, Babylon was besieged by the Assyrians and
starved into surrender. Assurbanipal purified the city and
celebrated a "service of reconciliation", but did not venture to
"take the hands" of Bel. In the subsequent overthrow of the
Assyrian Empire, the Babylonians saw another example of divine
vengeance. (Albert
Houtum-Schindler, "Babylon," Encyclopaedia Britannica,
11th ed.)
Mural near the reconstructed Ishtar Gate, depicting the
palace quarter of Nebuchadnezzar's Babylon. The Ishtar Gate
is shown in the top left corner of the image.
Under
Nabopolassar, Babylon threw off the Assyrian rule in 626 BC
and became the capital of the Neo-Babylonian Chaldean Empire.[3][4][5]
With the recovery of Babylonian independence, a new era of
architectural activity ensued, and his son
Nebuchadnezzar II (604–561 BC) made Babylon into one of the
wonders of the ancient world.[6]
Nebuchadnezzar ordered the complete reconstruction of the imperial
grounds, including rebuilding the
Etemenanki
ziggurat and the construction of the
Ishtar Gate — the most spectacular of eight gates that ringed
the perimeter of Babylon. The Ishtar Gate survives today in the
Pergamon Museum in
Berlin. Nebuchadnezzar is also credited with the construction
of the
Hanging Gardens of Babylon (one of the
seven wonders of the ancient world), said to have been built
for his homesick wife
Amyitis. Whether the gardens did exist is a matter of dispute.
Although excavations by German archaeologist
Robert Koldewey are thought to reveal its foundations, many
historians disagree about the location, and some believe it may
have been confused with gardens in
Nineveh.
Persia captures Babylon
In 539 BC, the Neo-Babylonian Empire fell to
Cyrus the Great, king of
Persia, with an unprecedented military maneuver. The famed
walls of Babylon were indeed impenetrable, with the only way into
the city through one of its many gates or through the Euphrates,
which ebbed beneath its thick walls. Metal gates at the river's
in-flow and out-flow prevented underwater intruders, if one could
hold one's breath to reach them. Cyrus (or his generals) devised a
plan to use the Euphrates as the mode of entry to the city,
ordering large camps of troops at each point and instructed them
to wait for the signal. Awaiting an evening of a national feast
among Babylonians (generally thought to refer to the feast of
Belshazzar mentioned in Daniel V), Cyrus' troops diverted the
Euphrates river upstream, causing the Euphrates to drop to about
'mid thigh level on a man' or to dry up altogether. The soldiers
marched under the walls through thigh-level water or as dry as
mud. The Persian Army conquered the outlying areas of the city's
interior while a majority of Babylonians at the city center were
oblivious to the breach. The account was elaborated upon by
Herodotus,[7]
and is also mentioned by passages in the Hebrew Bible.[8][9]
Cyrus claimed the city by walking through the gates of Babylon
with little or no resistance from the drunken Babylonians.
Cyrus later issued
a decree permitting captive people, including the
Jews, to return to their own land (as explained in the Old
Testament), to allow their temple to be rebuilt back in
Jerusalem.
Under Cyrus and the subsequent Persian king
Darius the Great, Babylon became the capital city of the 9th
Satrapy (Babylonia in the south and Athura in the north), as well
as a centre of learning and scientific advancement. In
Achaemenid Persia, the ancient Babylonian arts of
astronomy and
mathematics were revitalised and flourished, and Babylonian
scholars completed maps of constellations. The city was the
administrative capital of the
Persian Empire, the preeminent power of the then known world,
and it played a vital part in the history of that region for over
two centuries. Many important archaeological discoveries have been
made that can provide a better understanding of that era.[10][11]
The early Persian kings had attempted to maintain the
religious ceremonies of
Marduk, but by the reign of
Darius III, over-taxation and the strains of numerous wars led
to a deterioration of Babylon's main shrines and canals, and the
disintegration of the surrounding region. Despite three attempts
at rebellion in 522 BC, 521 BC and 482 BC, the land and city of
Babylon remained solidly under Persian rule for two centuries,
until
Alexander the Great's entry in 331 BC.
Hellenistic period
In 331 BC, Darius III was defeated by the forces of the
Macedonian ruler
Alexander the Great at the
Battle of Gaugamela, and in October, Babylon fell to the young
conqueror. A native account of this invasion notes a ruling by
Alexander not to enter the homes of its inhabitants.[12]
Under Alexander, Babylon again flourished as a centre of
learning and commerce. But following Alexander's death in 323 BC
in the palace of Nebuchadnezzar, his empire was divided amongst
his generals, and decades of fighting soon began, with Babylon
once again caught in the middle.
The constant turmoil virtually emptied the city of Babylon.
A tablet dated 275 BC states that the inhabitants of Babylon were
transported to
Seleucia, where a palace was built, as well as a temple given
the ancient name of
Esagila. With this deportation, the history of Babylon comes
practically to an end,[citation
needed] though more than a century later, it
was found that sacrifices were still performed in its old
sanctuary. By 141 BC, when the
Parthian Empire took over the region, Babylon was in complete
desolation and obscurity.
Under the Parthian, and later,
Sassanid Persians, Babylon remained a province of the
Persian Empire for nine centuries, until about 650 AD. It
continued to have its own culture and peoples, who spoke varieties
of
Aramaic, and who continued to refer to their homeland as
Babylon. Some examples of their cultural products are often found
in the
Babylonian Talmud, the
Mandaean religion, and the religion of the prophet
Mani.
Archaeology of Babylon
Babylon in 1932
Historical knowledge of Babylon's
topography is derived from classical writers, the inscriptions
of Nebuchadnezzar, and several excavations, including those of the
Deutsche Orientgesellschaft begun in 1899. The layout is that of
the Babylon of Nebuchadnezzar; the older Babylon destroyed by
Sennacherib having left few, if any, traces behind.
Most of the existing remains lie on the east bank of the
Euphrates, the principal ones being three vast mounds: the
Babil to the north, the Qasr or "Palace" (also known as the
Mujelliba) in the centre, and the Ishgn "Amran ibn" All, with the
outlying spur of the Jumjuma, to the south. East of these come the
Ishgn el-Aswad or "Black Mound" and three lines of rampart, one of
which encloses the Babil mound on the north and east sides, while
a third forms a triangle with the southeast angle of the other
two. West of the
Euphrates are other ramparts, and the remains of the ancient
Borsippa.
We learn from
Herodotus and
Ctesias that the city was built on both sides of the river in
the form of a square, and was enclosed within a double row of
lofty walls, or a triple row according to Ctesias. Ctesias
describes the outermost wall as 360
stades (68 kilometers/42 mi) in circumference, while according
to Herodotus it measured 480 stades (90 kilometers/56 mi), which
would include an area of about 520 square kilometers (200 sq mi).
The estimate of Ctesias is essentially the same as that of
Q. Curtius (v. I. 26) — 368 stades — and
Cleitarchus (ap. Diod. Sic. ii. 7) — 365 stades;
Strabo (xvi. 1. 5) makes it 385 stades. But even the estimate
of Ctesias, assuming the stade to be its usual length, would imply
an area of about 260 square kilometers (100 sq mi). According to
Herodotus, the width of the walls was 24 m.
Reconstruction
In 1985,
Saddam Hussein started rebuilding the city on top of the old
ruins (because of this, artifacts and other finds may well be
under the city by now), investing in both restoration and new
construction. He inscribed his name on many of the bricks in
imitation of Nebuchadnezzar. One frequent inscription reads: "This
was built by Saddam Hussein, son of Nebuchadnezzar, to glorify
Iraq". This recalls the
ziggurat at
Ur, where
each individual brick was stamped with "Ur-Nammu, king of Ur, who
built the temple of
Nanna". These bricks became sought after as collectors' items
after the downfall of Hussein, and the ruins are no longer being
restored to their original state. He also installed a huge
portrait of himself and
Nebuchadnezzar at the entrance to the ruins, and shored up
Processional Way, a large boulevard of ancient stones, and the
Lion of Babylon, a black rock sculpture about 2,600 years old.
When the
Gulf War ended, Saddam wanted to build a modern palace, also
over some old ruins; it was made in the pyramidal style of a
Sumerian
ziggurat. He named it Saddam Hill. In 2003, he was ready to
begin the construction of a cable car line over Babylon when the
invasion began and halted the project.
An article published in April 2006 states that UN officials
and Iraqi leaders have plans for restoring Babylon, making it into
a cultural center. [13][14]
US Marines in front of the rebuilt ruins of Babylon,
2003.
US forces have occupied the site for some time and have
caused damage to the archaeological record. In a report of the
British Museum's Near East department, Dr. John Curtis
describes how parts of the archaeological site were levelled to
create a landing area for helicopters, and parking lots for heavy
vehicles. Curtis wrote that the occupation forces
"caused substantial damage to the [replica of the]
Ishtar Gate, one of the most famous monuments from antiquity
[...] US military vehicles crushed 2,600-year-old brick
pavements, archaeological fragments were scattered across the
site, more than 12 trenches were driven into ancient deposits
and military earth-moving projects contaminated the site for
future generations of scientists [...] Add to all that the
damage caused to nine of the moulded brick figures of dragons in
the Ishtar Gate by soldiers trying to remove the bricks from the
wall."
A US Military spokesman claimed that engineering operations
were discussed with the "head of the Babylon museum".
[15]
The head of the Iraqi State Board for Heritage and
Antiquities, Donny George, said that the "mess will take decades
to sort out".[16]
In April 2006, Colonel John Coleman, former chief of staff for the
1st Marine Expeditionary Force, offered to issue an apology for
the damage done by military personnel under his command. However
he claimed that the US presence had deterred far greater damage
from other looters.[17]
Some antiquities were removed since creation of Camp Alpha,
without doubt to be sold on the antiquities market, which is
booming since the beginning of the occupation of Iraq[18].
[3]
The Ancient Middle Eastern Capital City — Reflection and Navel
of the World by Stefan Maul ("Die altorientalische
Hauptstadt — Abbild und Nabel der Welt," in Die Orientalische
Stadt: Kontinuität. Wandel. Bruch. 1 Internationales
Kolloquium der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft. 9.-1 0. Mai 1996
in Halle/Saale, Saarbrücker Druckerei und Verlag (1997),
p.109-124.
^
Bradford, Alfred S. (2001). With Arrow, Sword, and Spear: A
History of Warfare in the Ancient World, pp. 47-48.
Greenwood Publishing Group.
ISBN 0275952592.
^
Curtis, Adrian; Herbert Gordon May (2007). Oxford Bible
Atlas Oxford University Press ISBN: 978-0191001581 p. 122
"chaldean+empire"&num=100
^
Beck, Roger B.; Linda Black, Larry S. Krieger, Phillip C.
Naylor, Dahia Ibo Shabaka, (1999). World History: Patterns
of Interaction. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell.
ISBN 0-395-87274-X.
In his diligently documented book,mented book, BABYLON
MYSTERY RELIGION (1966,1981 ISBN#
091693800X), Ralph Woodrow explains, ---
"Instead of this day (Dec. 25) being the time of our Saviour's birth,
it was the very day and season on which the pagans for centuries had
celebrated the birth of the Sun-god! December 25th was the day of the
old Roman feast of the birth of Sol—one of the names of the sun-god.
In pagan days, this birth of the sun-god was especially popular among
that branch of the "mysteries" known as Mithraism. Concerning this we
read: 'The largest pagan religious cult which fostered the celebration
of December 25 as a holiday throughout the Roman and Greek worlds was
the pagan sun worship—Mithraism. This winter festival was called THE
NATIVITY—the nativity of the SUN.' And not only was Mithra, the
sun-god of Mithraism, said to be born at this time of the year, but
Osiris, Horus, Hercules, Bacchus, Adonis, Jupiter, Tammuz, and other
sun-gods were also supposedly born at what is today called the
'Christmas' season—the winter solstice! Says a noted writer: 'The
winter solstice was the time at which all the sun-gods from Osiris to
Jupiter and Mithra had celebrated their birthdays, the celebration
being adorned with the pine tree of Adonis, the holly of Saturn, and
the mistletoe...tapers represented the kindling of the newborn
sun-god's fire.' Now the fact that the various sungods that were
worshipped in different countries were all believed to have been born
at the same season (in the old fables), would seem to indicate that
they were but different forms (under different names) of the original
son of THE SUN-god, TAMMUZ, of Babylon, THE LAND From WHICH
SUN-worship originally SPREAD. In Babylon, the birthday of Tammuz was
celebrated at the time of the winter solstice with great feasts,
revelry, and drunkenness—the same way many celebrate today! The
ancient celebration spread and became so much an established custom
that in pagan Rome and Greece, in the days of the Teutonic barbarians,
in the remote times of ancient Egyptian civilization, in the infancy
of the race, the period of the winter solstice was ever a period of
rejoicing and festivity. When this mid-winter festival came to Rome,
it was known as the Saturnalia—Saturn being but another name of Nimrod
or Tammuz as The hidden god." -- end quote/book excerpt.
The nativity worship of the sun-god Tammuz
was performed with carved idol images that were set up in chamber
rooms (manger scene sets) and prayed to. These are mentioned by the
prophet of God, Ezekiel:
"Then said he unto me, Son of man, hast thou seen what the
ancients of the house of Israel do in the dark, every man in the
chambers of his imagery?("inner rooms
of carved idols"; see Strong's Heb.Dict.#s 2315,4906; compare
Lev.26:1) for they say, Yahweh seeth us not;
Yahweh hath forsaken the earth. He said also unto me, Turn thee yet
again, and thou shalt see greater abominations that they do. Then He
brought me to the door of the gate of Yahweh's house which was toward
the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz."
(Ezek.8:12-14)
The figures of the "modern" nativity sets have
been given "Christian names" (such as Mary, Joseph, Three Wise men,
shepherds, etc) but these are only an evolved corruption of the real
representation of Tammuz worship.
The Bible in Matthew 2:11-16 has no mention of a " new-born manger
scene" nor "three wise men" visiting Mary and Joseph AT THE
TIME OF CHRIST'S BIRTH! The Bible story explains that wise men came
INTO A HOUSE to visit the messiah child Jesus when He was
already TWO YEARS OLD! However we find in the ancient Babylonian
religion, traditions of beliefs that Baal priests attended the birth
of their baby god Tammuz at the time of the winter solstice. It was
this heathen figurine Nativity Scene concept which the Roman Catholic
Church incorporated into the story of the birth of Jesus at Bethlehem,
which we read about in the Bible.
Other Sumerian texts showed that kings were to be
married to Inanna in a
mystical marriage, for example a hymn that describes
the mystical marriage of King Iddid-Dagan (ca 1900
BCE).[5]
Dumuzid and Inanna
Today several versions of the Sumerian death of
Dumuzi have been recovered, "Inanna's Descent to the
Underworld", "Dumuzi's dream" and "Dumuzi and the galla",
as well as a tablet separately recounting Dumuzi's death,
mourned by holy Inanna, and his noble sister Geštinanna,
and even his dog and the lambs and kids in his fold;
Dumuzi himself is weeping at the hard fate in store for
him, after he had walked among men, and the cruel galla
of the Underworld seize him.[6]
A number of pastoral poems and songs relate the love
affair of
Inanna and
Dumuzid the shepherd. A text recovered in 1963
recounts "The Courtship of Inanna and
Dumuzi" in terms that are tender and frankly erotic.
According to the myth of Inanna's
descent to the underworld, represented in parallel
Sumerian and Akkadian[7]
tablets, Inanna (Ishtar in the Akkadian texts) set off for
the netherworld, or Kur, which was ruled by her sister
Ereshkigal, perhaps to take it as her own. She passed
through seven gates and at each one was required to leave
a garment or an ornament so that when she had passed
through the seventh gate she was entirely naked. Despite
warnings about her presumption, she did not turn back but
dared to sit herself down on Ereshkigal's throne.
Immediately the
Anunnaki of the
underworld judged her, gazed at her with the eyes of
death, and she became a corpse, hung up on a nail.
Based on the incomplete texts as first found, it was
assumed that Ishtar/Inanna's descent into Kur occurred
after the death of Tammuz/Dumuzid rather than before
and that her purpose was to rescue Tammuz/Dumuzid. This is
the familiar form of the myth as it appeared in M.
Jastrow's Descent of the Goddess Ishtar into the Lower
World, 1915, widely available on the Internet. New
texts uncovered in 1963 filled in the story in quite
another fashion,[8]
showing that Dumuzi was in fact consigned to the
Underworld himself, in order to secure Inanna's release.
Inanna's faithful servant attempted to get help from
the other gods but only wise
Enki/Ea
responded. The details of Enki/Ea's plan differ slightly
in the two surviving accounts, but in the end,
Inanna/Ishtar was resurrected. However, a "conservation of
souls" law required her to find a replacement for herself
in Kur. She went from one god to another, but each one
pleaded with her and she had not the heart to go through
with it until she found Dumuzid/Tammuz richly dressed and
on her throne. Inanna/Ishtar immediately set her
accompanying demons on Dumuzid/Tammuz. At this point the
Akkadian text fails as Tammuz' sister Belili, introduced
for the first time, strips herself of her jewelry in
mourning but claims that Tammuz and the dead will come
back.
There is some confusion here. The name Belili occurs
in one of the Sumerian texts also, but it is not the name
of Dumuzid's sister who is there named
Geshtinana, but is the name of an old woman whom
another text calls Bilulu.
In any case, the Sumerian texts relate how Dumuzid
fled to his sister Geshtinana who attempted to hide him
but who could not in the end stand up to the demons.
Dumuzid has two close calls until the demons finally catch
up with him under the supposed protection of this old
woman called Bilulu or Belili and then they take him.
However Inanna repents.
Inanna seeks vengeance on Bilulu, on Bilulu's
murderous son G̃irg̃ire and on G̃irg̃ire's consort Shirru
"of the haunted desert, no-one's child and no-one's
friend". Inanna changes Bilulu into a waterskin and
G̃irg̃ire into a protective god of the desert while Shirru
is assigned to watch always that the proper rites are
performed for protection against the hazards of the
desert.
Finally, Inanna relents and changes her decree
thereby restoring her husband Dumuzi to life; an
arrangement is made by which Geshtinana will take
Dumuzid's place in Kur for six months of the year: "You
(Dumuzi), half the year. Your sister (Geštinanna), half
the year!" This newly-recovered final line upset
Samuel Noah Kramer's former interpretation, as he
allowed: "my conclusion that Dumuzi dies and "stays dead"
forever (cf e.g. Mythologies of the Ancient World
p. 10) was quite erroneous: Dumuzi according to the
Sumerian mythographers rises from the dead annually and,
after staying on earth for half the year, descends to the
Nether World for the other half".[9]
The "Courtship of Inanna and
Dumuzi"
Aside from this extended epic "The Descent of
Inanna," a previously unknown "Courtship of Inanna and
Dumuzi" was first translated into English and annotated by
Sumerian scholar Samuel Noah Kramer and folklorist Diane
Wolkstein working in tandem, and published in 1983.[10]
In this tale Inanna's lover, the shepherd-king Dumuzi,
brought a wedding gift of milk in pails, yoked across his
shoulders.
The myth of Inanna and Dumuzi formed the subject of
a Lindisfarne Symposium, published as The Story of
Inanna and Dumuzi: From Folk-Tale to Civilized Literature:
A Lindisfarne Symposium, (William
Irwin Thompson, editor, 1995).
Notes
^
Joseph Campbell "the dead and resurrected god Tammuz
(Sumerian Dumuzi), prototype of the Classical Adonis,
who was the consort as well as son by virgin birth, of
the goddess-mother of many names: Inanna, Ninhursag,
Ishtar, Astarte, Artemis, Demeter, Aphrodite, Venus"
(in Oriental Mythology: The Masks of God pp
39-40).
^
Marcovich,"From Ishtar to Aphrodite" Journal of
Aesthetic Education 30.2, Special Issue:
Distinguished Humanities Lectures II (Summer 1996) p
49.
^
Edwin M. Yamauchi, "Tammuz and the Bible" Journal
of Biblical Literature 84.3 (September
1965:283-290).
^Inana and Bilulu: an ulila to Inana, from
Black, J.A., Cunningham, G., Robson, E., and Zólyomi,
G., The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature
(Oxford)[1][2]
^
Samuel Noah Kramer, "Cuneiform studies and the
history of literature: The Sumerian sacred marriage
texts", ''Proceedings of the American Philosophical
Society107 (1963:485-527).
^
Samuel Noah Kramer, "The Death of Dumuzi: A New
Sumerian Version" Anatolian Studies 30, Special
Number in Honour of the Seventieth Birthday of
Professor O. R. Gurney (1980:5-13).
^
Edwin M. Yamauchi, "Tammuz and the Bible" Journal
of Biblical Literature 84.3 (September
1965:283-290).
^
S. N. Kramer, "Dumuzi's Annual Resurrection: An
Important Correction to 'Inanna's Descent'"
Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research
183 (October 1966:31), interpreting this
newly-recovered final line as uttered by Inanna,
though the immediately preceding context is
incomplete.
^
Diane Wolkstein and Samuel Noah Kramer
editors/translators 1983. Inanna, Queen of Heaven &
Earth: Her Stories and Hymns from Sumer. (New
York: Harper Colophon).
External links
Sumerian Poems about Dumuzid and Inanna
ETSCL: Narratives: Inanna and Dumuzid in
Unicode and
ASCII
More than twenty claims of beings invested with divine honor
(deified)—have come forward and presented themselves at the bar of the
world with their credentials, to contest the verdict of Christendom, in
having proclaimed Jesus Christ, "the only son, and sent of God:" twenty
Messiahs, Saviors, and Sons of God, according to history or tradition,
have, in past times, descended from heaven, and taken upon themselves the
form of men, clothing themselves with human flesh, and furnishing
incontestable evidence of a divine origin, by various miracles, marvelous
works, and superlative virtues; and finally these twenty Jesus Christs
(accepting their character
for the name) laid the foundation for the salvation of the world,
and ascended back to heaven.
1. Chrishna of Hindostan.
2. Budha Sakia of India.
3. Salivahana of Bermuda.
4. Zulis, or Zhule, also Osiris and Orus, of Egypt.
5. Odin of the Scandinavians.
6. Crite of Chaldea.
7. Zoroaster and Mithra of Persia.
8. Baal and Taut, "the only Begotten of God," of Phenicia.
9. Indra of Thibet.
10. Bali of Afghanistan.
11. Jao of Nepaul.
12. Wittoba of the Bilingonese.
13. Thammuz of Syria.
14. Atys of Phrygia.
15. Xaniolxis of Thrace.
16. Zoar of the Bonzes.
17. Adad of Assyria.
18. Deva Tat, and Sammonocadam of Siam.
19. Alcides of Thebes.
20. Mikado of the Sintoos.
21. Beddru of Japan.
22. Hesus or Eros, and Bremrillah, of the Druids.
23. Thor, son of Odin, of the Gauls.
24. Cadmus of Greece.
25. Hil and Feta of the Mandaites.
26. Gentaut and Quexalcote of Mexico.
27. Universal Monarch of the Sibyls.
28. Ischy of the Island of Formosa.
29. Divine Teacher of Plato.
30. Holy One of Xaca.
31. Fohi and Tien of China.
32. Adonis, son of the virgin Io of Greece.
33. Ixion and Quirinus of Rome.
34. Prometheus of Caucasus.
35. Mohamud, or Mahomet, of Arabia.
These have all received divine honors, have nearly all been
worshiped as Gods, or sons of God; were mostly incarnated as Christs,
Saviors, Messiahs, or Mediators; not a few of them were reputedly born of
virgins; some of them filling a character almost identical with that
ascribed by the Christian's bible to Jesus Christ; many of them, like
him, are reported to have been crucified; and all of them, taken
together, furnish a prototype and parallel for nearly every important
incident and wonder-inciting miracle, doctrine and precept recorded in the
New Testament, of the Christian's Savior. Surely, with so many Saviors the
world cannot, or should not, be lost.
We have now presented before us a two-fold ground for doubting and
disputing the claims put forth by the Christian world in behalf of "Our
Lord and Savior Jesus Christ." In the first place, allowing the question
to be answered in the affirmative as to whether he was really a Savior, or
supernatural being, or more than a mere man, a negative answer to which
seems to have been sprung (as previously intimated) at the very hour of
his birth, and that by his kindred, his own nearest relatives; as it is
declared, "his own brethren did not believe on him"—a skepticism which has
been growing deeper and broader from that day to this.
And now, upon the heel of this question, we find another formidable
query to be met and answered, viz.: Was he (Christ) the only Savior,
seeing that a multitude of similar claims are now upon our council-board
to be disposed of?
We shall, however, leave the theologians of the various religious
schools to adjust and settle this difficulty among themselves. We shall
leave them to settle the question as best they can as to whether Jesus
Christ was the only son and sent of God—"the only begotten of the Father,"
as John declares him to be (John i. 14)—in view of the fact that long
prior to his time various personages, in different nations, were invested
with the title "Son of God," and have left behind them similar proofs and
credentials of the justness of their claims to such a title, if being
essentially alike—as we shall prove and demonstrate them to be—can make
their claims similar.
We shall present an array of facts and historical proofs,
drawn from numerous histories and the Holy Scriptures and bibles
appertaining to these various Saviors, and which include a history of
their lives and doctrines, that will go to show that in nearly all their
leading features, and mostly even in their details, they are strikingly
similar.
A comparison, or parallel view, extended through their sacred
histories, so as to include an exhibition presented in parallels of the
teachings of their respective bibles, would make it clearly manifest that,
with respect to nearly every important thought, deed, word, action,
doctrine, principle, receipt, tenet, ritual, ordinance or ceremony, and
even the various important characters or personages, who figure in their
religious dramas as Saviors, prophets, apostles, angels, devils, demons,
exalted or fallen genii—in a word, nearly every miraculous or marvelous
story, moral precept, or tenet of religious faith, noticed in either the
Old or New Testament Scriptures of Christendom—from the Jewish cosmogony,
or story of creation in Genesis, to the last legendary tale in St. John's
"Arabian Nights" (alias the Apocalypse)—there is to be found an
antitype for, or outline of, somewhere in the sacred records or bibles of
the oriental heathen nations, making equal if not higher pretention to a
divine emanation and divine inspiration, and admitted by all historians,
even the most orthodox, to be of much more ancient date; for while
Christians only claim, for the earthly advent of their Savior and the
birth of their religion, a period less than nineteen hundred years in the
past, on the contrary, most of the deific or divine incarnations of the
heathen and their respective religions are, by the concurrent and united
verdict of all history, assigned a date several hundred or several
thousand years earlier, thus leaving the inference patent that so far as
there has been any borrowing or transfer of materials from one system to
another, Christianity has been the borrower.