As an adult, Hope donated sizable sums of money to the institution.
Silent film comedian
Fatty Arbuckle saw one of his performances with his first
partner,
Lloyd "Lefty" Durbin, and in 1925 got the pair steady work with Hurley's
Jolly Follies. Within a year, Hope had formed an act called the
Dancemedians with
George Byrne and the
Hilton Sisters, conjoined twins who had a tap dancing routine.
Hope
and his partner George Byrne had an act as a pair of Siamese twins as
well,
and both danced and sang while wearing
blackface, before friends advised Hope that
he was funnier as himself. In 1929, he changed his first name to "Bob". In one version
of the
story, he named himself after racecar driver
Bob
Burman. In another, he said
he chose Bob because he wanted a name
with a friendly "Hiya Fellas!" sound to it.
After five years on the
vaudeville circuit, by his own account, Hope was surprised and
humbled
when he and his partner (and future wife) Grace Louise Troxell failed a
1930
screen test for
Pathé at
Culver City, California.
]Career
Film
Hope, like other stage performers, made his first films in New York.
Educational Pictures employed him in 1934 for a short-subject
comedy,
Going Spanish.
Hope sealed his fate with Educational when
Walter Winchell asked him about the film.
Hope cracked, "When they
catch
John Dillinger, they're going to make him sit through
it twice."
Educational fired him, but he was soon before the cameras at New York's
Vitaphone studio starring in 20-minute comedies and musicals from
1934 through 1936,
beginning with
Paree, Paree (1934).
Paramount Pictures signed Hope for the 1938 film
The Big Broadcast of 1938. During
a duet with
Shirley Ross as accompanied by
Shep Fields and his orchestra, Hope
introduced the song later to
become his trademark, "Thanks
for the Memory", which
became a major hit and was praised by
critics. The sentimental, fluid nature of the
music allowed Hope's
writers (whom he is said to have depended upon heavily
throughout his
career) to later invent endless variations of the song to fit specific
circumstances, such as bidding farewell to troops while on tour.
Hope became one of Paramount's biggest stars, and
would remain with the studio
through the 1950s. Hope's regular appearances in Hollywood films and
radio made
him one of the best known entertainers in North America, and at the
height of his
career he was also making a large income from live concert performances
As a movie star, he was best known for
My Favorite Brunette and the highly
successful
"Road" movies in which he starred with
Bing Crosby and
Dorothy
Lamour. Hope had seen Lamour as a nightclub singer in New
York, and invited
her to work on his
USO tours. Lamour is said to have arrived for filming
prepared with
her lines, only to be baffled by completely re-written scripts from
Hope's writers without studio permission. Hope and Lamour were lifelong
friends,
and she is the actress most associated with his film career.
beginning with
Paree, Paree (1934).
Paramount Pictures signed Hope for the 1938 film
The Big Broadcast of 1938.
During a duet with
Shirley Ross as accompanied by
Shep Fields and his orchestra,
Hope introduced the song later to
become his trademark, "Thanks
for the Memory",
which became a major hit and was praised by
critics. The sentimental, fluid nature
of the music allowed Hope's
writers (whom he is said to have depended upon heavily
throughout his
career) to later invent endless variations of the song to fit specific
circumstances, such as bidding farewell to troops while on tour.
Hope became one of Paramount's biggest stars, and would remain with
the studio
through the 1950s. Hope's regular appearances in Hollywood
films and radio made
him one of the best known entertainers in North
America, and at the height of his
career he was also making a large
income from live concert performances.
As a movie star, he was best known for
My Favorite Brunette and the highly
successful
"Road" movies in which he starred with
Bing Crosby and
Dorothy
Lamour. Hope had seen Lamour as a nightclub singer in New
York, and invited
her to work on his
USO tours. Lamour is said to have arrived for filming prepared
with
her lines, only to be baffled by completely re-written scripts from
Hope's
writers without studio permission. Hope and Lamour were lifelong
friends, and she
is the actress most associated with his film career.
In October 1956, Hope appeared on an episode of the most-viewed
program in
America at the time,
I
Love Lucy. He said, upon receiving the script: "What?
A script?
I don't need one of these"[cite
this quote], and ad-libbed the entire episode.
Desi Arnaz said of Hope after his appearance: "Bob is a very nice
man, he can
crack you up, no matter how much you try for him to not."[cite
this quote] Lucy
and Desi returned the favor by appearing
on one of his Chevy Show specials (with
Vivian Vance and
William Frawley) later that season.
Hope's 1970 and 1971 Christmas specials for NBC—filmed in
Vietnam
in front of
military audiences at the height of the war—are on the list
of the
Top 30 U.S. Network
Primetime Telecasts of All Time. Both were seen
by more than 60% of the U.S.
households watching television.
In 1992, Bob Hope made a guest appearance as himself on
The Simpsons, in the episode
"Lisa
the Beauty Queen" (season 4, episode 4). The episode attracted 11.1
million
viewers when it premiered on October 15. His final television
special, Laughing with
the Presidents, was broadcast in 1996,
with
Tony Danza helping Hope present a
personal retrospective of
presidents of the United States known to the comedian.
USO
For more on this topic see
USO – Honoring Bob Hope
Bob Hope's 1966 Christmas Show at Nakhon Phanom, Thailand
his first
United
Service Organizations (USO) show on May 6, 1941, at
March Field,
California. He continued to travel and entertain troops
for the rest of World War II
and later during the
Korean War, the
Vietnam War, the third phase of the
Lebanon
Civil War, the latter years of the
Iran–Iraq War, and the 1990–1991
Persian
Gulf War.
When overseas he almost always performed in Army
fatigues as a show of support for
his audience. Hope's USO career
lasted half a century, during which he headlined
approximately 60 tours.
For his service to his country through the USO, he was
awarded the
Sylvanus Thayer Award by the
United States Military Academy at
West Point in 1968.
Of Hope's USO shows in World War II, writer
John Steinbeck, who was then working
as a war correspondent, wrote
in 1943:
“ |
When the time for recognition of service to the nation in
wartime comes to be
considered, Bob Hope should be high on the
list. This man drives himself and is
driven. It is impossible to
see how he can do so much, can cover so much ground,
can work so
hard, and can be so effective. He works month after month at a
pace
that would kill most people.
|
” |
A 1997 act of
Congress signed by
President Clinton named Hope an "Honorary Veteran."
He remarked,
"I've been given many awards in my lifetime — but to be numbered
among
the men and women I admire most — is the greatest honor I have ever
received."
Hope appeared in so many theaters of war over the decades that it was
often cracked
(in Bob Hope style) that "Where there's death, there's
Hope".
In 2009,
Stephen Colbert carried a golf club on stage each night during his
own week-
long USO performance and taping of
The Colbert Report[17]
and explained in his last
episode that it was an homage to Hope.
Theater
Hope's first Broadway appearances, in 1927's The Sidewalks of New
York and 1928's
Ups-a-Daisy, were minor walk-on parts.
He returned to Broadway in 1933 to star
as Huckleberry Haines in the
Jerome Kern/Dorothy
Fields musical
Roberta.
Stints in
the musicals
Say
When, the 1936
Ziegfeld Follies (with
Fanny Brice), and
Red, Hot and
Blue with
Ethel Merman and
Jimmy Durante followed. His performances were generally
well-received and critics noted his keen sense of comedic timing. Hope
reprised his role
as Huck Haines in a 1958 production of Roberta
at
The
Muny Theater in
Forest Park,
St. Louis, Missouri.
Hope rescued Eltham Little Theatre from closure by providing the
funds to buy the
property, he continued his interest and support and
regularly visited when in London.
The Theatre was renamed in his honor
in 1982.
[Sports
Hope was an avid golfer. He was introduced to the game in the 1930s,
and eventually
played to a four
handicap. His love for the game, and the humor he could find in it,
made him a much sought-after
foursome member. He once remarked that President
Dwight D. Eisenhower gave up golf for painting – "fewer strokes, you
know."
In 1978,
he putted against a then two-year-old
Tiger Woods in a television appearance on
The Mike Douglas Show. By the 1980s, a golf club became an integral
prop for Hope
during the
stand-up segments of his television specials and USO Shows.
The
Bob Hope Classic was founded in 1960, and is currently the only
FedEx
Cup
tournament that takes place over five rounds. The tournament
made history in 1995,
when Hope teed up for the opening round in a
foursome that included Presidents
Gerald R. Ford,
George H.W. Bush and
Bill Clinton – the only time ever that three
presidents participated
in a golf foursome.
Hope would frequently use his television specials to promote the
annual
College
Football All-America Team. The team members would enter the
stage one by one
and introduce themselves, and Hope would then give a
one-liner about the player or
his school. Hope would often don a
football uniform for these presentations.
[Personal life
[Marriages
Hope's first wife was his vaudeville partner Grace Louise Troxell,
whom he married
on January 25, 1933. When the marriage record was
unearthed some years later,
Hope denied that the marriage had any
substance and said they had quickly divorced.
There were rumors that he
fathered a daughter with Troxell and that he continued to
send generous
cheques to her despite a widely documented reputation for
frugality.
In 1934 Bob Hope married
Dolores Reade, and adopted four children at The Cradle
in
Evanston, Illinois: Linda, Anthony, Kelly, and Nora.From them he had several
grandchildren, including Andrew, Miranda, and
Zachary Hope.
Later years
As Hope entered his ninth decade, he showed no signs of slowing down
and
continued appearing in numerous television specials. He was given an
80th
birthday party in 1983 at the
Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. which
was attended by President
Ronald Reagan. In 1985, he was presented with the
Life Achievement Award
at the
Kennedy Center Honors. He was presented
with the
Ronald Reagan Freedom Award in 1997 by
Nancy Reagan.[23]
The
following year, Hope was appointed an honorary Knight Commander of
the
Most Excellent
Order of the British Empire by
Queen Elizabeth II. Upon
accepting the appointment, Hope quipped,
"I'm speechless. 70 years of ad lib
material and I'm speechless".
At the age of 95, Hope made an appearance at the 50th anniversary of
the
Primetime Emmy Awards with
Milton Berle and
Sid
Caesar. Two years later,
Hope was present at the opening of the Bob
Hope Gallery of American
Entertainment at the
Library of Congress. The Library of Congress has
immortalized Bob
Hope's life with two major exhibitions - 'Hope for America:
Performers,
Politics and Pop Culture' and 'Bob Hope and American Variety'.
Hope celebrated his 100th birthday on May 29, 2003. He is among a
small group
of notable
centenarians in the field of
entertainment, which include:
Irving Berlin,
Hal
Roach,
Senor Wences,
George Abbott,
Adolph Zukor,
Barbara Kent,
Charles Lane,
Luise Rainer,
Gloria Stuart, and
George Burns. To mark this
event, the intersection of
Hollywood and Vine in Los Angeles, California was
named Bob Hope
Square and his centennial was declared Bob Hope Day in
35
states. Hope spent the day privately in his
Toluca Lake, Los Angeles home
where he had lived since 1937. Even at
100, Hope was said to have maintained
his self-deprecating sense of
humor, quipping, "I'm so old, they've canceled my
blood type."
He converted to
Roman Catholicism and was a devout Catholic.
Death
Hope had
premature obituaries on two separate occasions. In 1998 a prepared
obituary by
The Associated Press was inadvertently released on the Internet,
prompting Hope's death to be announced in the
US House of Representatives]
In 2003 he was among several famous figures whose pre-written obituaries
were
published on
CNN's website due to a lapse in password protection.
Beginning in 2000, Hope's health steadily declined and he was
hospitalized several
times before his death. In June 2000 he spent
nearly a week in a California hospital
after being hospitalized for
gastrointestinal bleeding.In August 2001, he spent
close to two weeks in the hospital recovering
from
pneumonia.
On July 27, 2003, Bob Hope died at his home in Toluca Lake at 9:28
p.m.
According to the Soledad O'Brien interview with Hope's grandson,
when asked
on his deathbed where he wanted to be buried, Hope told his
wife, "Surprise me
He was interred in the Bob Hope Memorial Garden at
San Fernando Mission Cemetery in Los Angeles, where his mother is
also buried.
Short subjects
[eBob Hope wrote or contributed to more than 15 books over his career.
Honors
- In 1962, Bob Hope was presented with the United States
Congressional
Gold Medal.
- In 1969, President
Lyndon Johnson bestowed the
Presidential Medal of F
reedom on Bob Hope for his service to the
men and women of the armed
forces through the
USO.
- Inducted into the
World Golf Hall of Fame in 1983.
- He was a member of the
National Association of Broadcasters Hall of Fame
in the radio
division.
- Knight Commander of the
Order of St. Gregory the Great (KCSG) – 1989
- In 1995, Bob Hope was presented with the
National Medal of Arts.
- Hope received the
Ronald Reagan Freedom Award in 1997.[36]
- Honorary
Knight Commander of the
Order of the British Empire
(KBE) – 1998
- Member of the
Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels
- One of the few non-members given the privilege of dotting the
'i' in the
S
cript Ohio routine performed by
The Ohio State University Marching Band.
- The historic chapel at the
Los Angeles National Cemetery was renamed as the
Bob Hope
Veterans Chapel on his 99th birthday, May 29, 2002 in "celebration
of his lifelong service to our American Veterans".
- The
Burbank, California, public airport was renamed
Bob Hope Airport in 2003.
- The historic
Bob Hope Patriotic Hall building on
Figueroa Street in
Los Angeles County was named in his honor on August 3, 2003, by
the
Board of
Supervisors.
-
USNS Bob Hope (T-AKR-300) of the U.S.
Military Sealift Command was named
after the performer in 1997.
It is one of very few
U.S. naval ships that were
named after living people.
-
The United States Air Force named a
C-17 Globemaster III transport aircraft
after Hope, the
Spirit of Bob Hope.
- The dining facility at Camp Lemonier (Djibouti, Africa) is named
the Bob Hope
Galley.
- In 2008, the research library at the
Ellis Island Immigration Museum was renamed
by Congress with the
consent of the President, as the Bob Hope Memorial Library.
- For contributions to the live theater, radio, motion picture,
and television, Bob
Hope was honored with four stars on the
Hollywood Walk of Fame.
- At the U.S. Naval Academy,
Alumni Hall is home to the Bob Hope Performing
Arts Center.
- The
Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in
Washington,
D.C. has a wing funded by Dolores and Bob Hope in memory
of his mother.
It is
dedicated to a miracle in
Pontmain,
France.
- The municipal clock tower of
Utica, New York is named the Tower of Hope in
honor of Bob Hope.
- In 2009, "A National Salute to Bob Hope and the Military" was
dedicated in
San Diego, California.
- The 64th and only civilian recipient of the United States Air
Force "Order of
the Sword." The Order of the Sword recognizes
individuals who have made
significant contributions to the enlisted
corps. Presented June 10, 1980.
FRANK ZAPPA
Frank Vincent Zappa[1]
(pronounced
/ˈzæpə/; December 21, 1940 – December 4, 1993)
was an
American
composer,
electric guitarist, record producer, and
film director. In
a career spanning more than 30 years, Zappa wrote
rock,
jazz,
electronic,
orchestral,
and
musique concrète works. He also directed feature-length films and
music videos, a
nd designed album covers. Zappa produced almost all
of the more than 60 albums he
released with the band
Mothers of Invention and as a solo artist.
While in his teens, he acquired a taste for percussion-based
avant-garde composers
such as
Edgard Varèse and 1950s
rhythm and blues music. He began writing classical
music in high
school, while at the same time playing drums in rhythm and blues
bands
—he later switched to electric guitar. He was a self-taught
composer and performer,
and his diverse musical influences led him to
create music that was often impossible
to categorize. His 1966 debut
album with the Mothers of Invention,
Freak Out!,
combined songs in conventional rock and roll format
with collective imp
FRANK ZArovisations and studio-generated sound collages. His
later albums shared
this eclectic and experimental approach,
irrespective of whether the fundamental
format was one of rock, jazz or
classical. He wrote the lyrics to all his songs, which—
often
humorously—reflected his iconoclastic view of established social and
political
processes, structures and movements. He was a strident critic
of mainstream
education and
organized religion, and a forthright and passionate advocate for
freedom of speech,
autodidacticism and the abolition of
censorship.
Zappa was a highly productive and prolific artist and he gained
widespread critical
acclaim. Many of his albums are considered essential
in rock and jazz history. He is
regarded as one of the most original
guitarists and composers of his time. He also
remains a major influence
on musicians and composers. He had some commercial
success, particularly
in Europe, and for most of his career was able to work as an
independent
artist. Zappa was posthumously inducted into the
Rock and Roll Hall
of Fame in 1995 and received the
Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award in 1997.
Zappa was married to Kathryn J. "Kay" Sherman from 1960 to 1964. In
1967 he
married
Adelaide Gail Sloatman, with whom he remained until his death from
prostate cancer in 1993. They had four children:
Moon Unit,
Dweezil,
Ahmet Emuukha Rodan and
Diva Thin Muffin Pigeen. Gail Zappa manages the
businesses of her
late husband under the name the Zappa Family Trust.
Early life
Frank Zappa was born in
Baltimore, Maryland, on December 21, 1940. His mother,
Rose Marie
(née Colimore), was of
Italian and
French descent, and his father,
Francis Vincent Zappa, was a native
of
Partinico,
Sicily
and had
Greek and
Arab
ancestry.Zappa was the eldest of four children, and had two brothers and a
sister.
The family moved often during Zappa's childhood because his father, a
chemist
and
mathematician, had various jobs in the US defense industry. After a
brief time
in
Florida
in the mid-1940s, the family returned to
Maryland, where Zappa's father
worked at the
Edgewood Arsenal
chemical warfare facility at the
Aberdeen Proving
Ground. Due to their home's proximity to the
arsenal, which stored
mustard gas,
gas masks were kept in the house in case of an
accident.[4]
This had a profound
effect on the young Zappa: references to germs, germ
warfare and other aspects of
the defense industry occur throughout his
work.
During his childhood Zappa was often sick, suffering from
asthma,
earaches
and
sinus
problems. A doctor treated the latter by inserting a pellet of
radium
into each of
Zappa's nostrils; little was known at the time about the
potential dangers of being
subjected to even small amounts of
therapeutic radiation]
Nasal imagery and
references appear both in his music and lyrics, as
well as in the collage album covers
created by his long-time visual
collaborator,
Cal Schenkel.
Many of Zappa's childhood diseases may have arisen from exposure to
mustard gas;
furthermore, his health worsened when he lived in the
Baltimore area.]
In 1952, his
family relocated mainly because of Zappa's health.[7]
They next moved to
Monterey, California, where Zappa's father taught
metallurgy at the
Naval Postgraduate School. Shortly afterward, they moved to
Claremont, then to
El Cajon before finally moving to
San Diego.
Musical influenc
ote: "Since I didn't have any kind of formal training, it didn't make
any difference in me if I was listening to Lightnin' Slim, or a
vocal group called the Jewels ..., or Webers, or Varese, or
Stravinsky. To me it was all good music. Frank Zappa - 1989
Zappa joined his first band, The Ramblers, at
Mission Bay High School in San Diego.
He was the band's drummer.
About the same time his parents bought a phonograph,
which allowed him
to develop his interest in music, and to begin building his record
collection.
R&B singles were early purchases, starting a large collection he
kept for
the rest of his life.
He was interested in sounds for their own sake, particularly the
sounds
of drums and other
percussion instruments. By age 12, he had obtained a snare
drum and
began learning the basics of orchestral percussion.
Zappa's deep interest in
modern classical music began
when he read a
LOOK magazine article about the
Sam
Goody record store chain that lauded its ability to sell an LP as
obscure as The
Complete Works of Edgard Varèse, Volume One.The article described
Varèse's
percussion composition
Ionisation, produced by
EMS Recordings, as "a weird
jumble of drums and other unpleasant
sounds". Zappa decided to seek out Varèse's
music. After searching for
over a year, Zappa found a copy (he noticed the LP
because of the "mad
scientist" looking photo of Varèse on the cover). Not having
enough
money with him, he persuaded the salesman to sell him the record at a
discount]
Thus began his lifelong passion for Varèse's music and that of other
modern classical composers.
Zappa grew up influenced by
avant-garde composers such as Varèse,
Igor Stravinsky and
Anton Webern, R&B and
doo-wop
groups (particularly local
pachuco
groups), and modern jazz. His own heterogeneous ethnic background, and
the diverse social and cultural mix in and around greater Los Angeles,
were crucial
in the formation of Zappa as a practitioner of
underground music and of his later
distrustful and openly critical
attitude towards "mainstream" social, political and
musical movements.
He frequently lampooned musical fads like
psychedelia,
rock opera and
disco.Television also exerted a strong influence, as demonstrated
by
quotations from show themes and advertising jingles found in his later
works.
[
Youth and beginning of career (1955–1960)
By 1956, the Zappa family had moved to
Lancaster, a small
aerospace and farming
town in the
Antelope Valley of the
Mojave Desert close to
Edwards Air Force Base,
in northern
Los Angeles County. Zappa's mother encouraged him in his musical
interests. Although she disliked Varèse's music, she was indulgent
enough to give
her son a long distance call to the composer as a 15th
birthday present.U
nfortunately, Varèse was in Europe at the time, so Zappa spoke to the
composer's
wife. He later received a letter from Varèse thanking him for
his interest, and
telling him about a composition he was working on
called "Déserts".
Living in
the desert town of Lancaster, Zappa found this very exciting.
Varèse invited him
to visit if he ever came to New York. The meeting
never took place (Varèse died in
1965), but Zappa framed the letter and
kept it on display for the rest of his life.
At
Antelope Valley High School, Zappa met Don Vliet (who later expanded
his
name to Don Van Vliet and adopted the stage name
Captain Beefheart). Zappa
and Vliet became close friends, sharing an
interest in R&B records and
influencing each other musically throughout
their careers.
Around the same time, Zappa started playing drums in a local band,
The Blackouts.
The band was racially diverse, and included
Euclid James "Motorhead" Sherwood
who later became a member of the
Mothers of Invention. Zappa's interest in the
guitar grew, and in 1957
he was given his first guitar. Among his early influences
were
Johnny "Guitar" Watson,
Howlin' Wolf and
Clarence "Gatemouth" Brown.
(In the 1970s and '80s, he invited Watson to perform on several albums.)
Zappa
considered soloing as the equivalent of forming "air sculptures",
and developed an
eclectic, innovative and personal style.
Zappa's interest in composing and arranging proliferated in his last
high-school
years. By his final year, he was writing,
arranging and
conducting avant-garde
performance pieces for the school
orchestra.
He graduated from Antelope Valley
High School in 1958, and later
acknowledged two of his music teachers on the
sleeve of the 1966 album
Freak Out!Due to his family's frequent moves, Zappa
attended at least six
different
high schools, and as a student he was often bored
and given to
distracting the rest of the class with juvenile antics]
He left
community college after one semester, and maintained thereafter
a disdain for
formal education, taking his children out of school at age
15 and refusing to
pay for their college.
Zappa left home in 1959, and moved into a small apartment in
Echo Park, Los
Angeles. After meeting Kathryn J. "Kay" Sherman
during his short stay at
Pomona College, they moved in together in
Ontario, and were married
December 28, 1960.
Zappa worked for a short period in advertising. His sojourn
in the
commercial world was brief, but gave him valuable insights into how it
works.Throughout his career, he took a keen interest in the visual
presentation
of his work, designing some of his album covers and
directing his own films and
videos.
[
Early 1960s: Studio
Z
Zappa attempted to earn a living as a musician and composer, and
played different
nightclub gigs, some with a new version of The
Blackouts.[28]
Financially more
rewarding were Zappa's earliest professional
recordings, two soundtracks for the
low-budget films
The World's Greatest Sinner (1962) and Run Home Slow
(1965).
The former score was commissioned by actor-producer
Timothy Carey and
recorded in 1961. It contains many themes that
appeared on later Zappa records]
The latter soundtrack was recorded in 1963 after the film was completed,
but it
was commissioned by one of Zappa's former high school teachers in
1959 and
Zappa may have worked on it before the film was shot.
Excerpts from the
soundtrack can be heard on the posthumous album
The Lost Episodes (1996).
During the early 1960s, Zappa wrote and produced songs for other
local artists,
often working with singer-songwriter
Ray Collins and producer Paul Buff.
Their "Memories of El Monte" was
recorded by
The Penguins (although only
Cleve Duncan of the original group was
featured).
Buff owned the small
Pal Recording Studio in
Cucamonga, which included a unique five-track tape
recorder he had
built. At that time, only a handful of the most sophisticated
commercial
studios had
multi-track facilities; the industry standard for smaller
studios
was still mono or two-track.
Although none of the recordings from
the period achieved major
commercial success, Zappa earned enough money
to allow him to stage a
concert of his orchestral music in 1963 and to broadcast
and record it.[
He appeared on
Steve Allen's syndicated late night show the same year, in which
he
played a bicycle as a musical instrument.[34]
With Captain Beefheart, Zappa
recorded some songs under the name of The
Soots. They were rejected by
Dot Records for having no "commercial potential"; a quote Zappa
later used
on the sleeve of
Freak Out!
In 1964, after his marriage started to break up, he moved into the
Pal studio and
began routinely working 12 hours or more per day
recording and experimenting
with
overdubbing and
audio tape manipulation. This set a work pattern that
endured for
most of his life.
Aided by his income from film composing,
Zappa took over the studio from
Paul Buff, who was now working with
Art
Laboe at
Original Sound. It was renamed Studio Z.
Studio Z was rarely
booked for recordings by other musicians. Instead, friends moved in,
notably
James "Motorhead" Sherwoo
Zappa started performing as guitarist with a
power trio, The Muthers, in local bars in order to support himself.
An article in the local press describing Zappa as "the Movie King of
Cucamonga"
prompted the local police to suspect that he was making
pornographic films.
In
March 1965, Zappa was approached by a
vice squad undercover officer, and
accepted an offer of $100 to
produce a suggestive audio tape for an alleged
stag party. Zappa and a female friend faked an erotic recording.
When Zappa
was about to hand over the tape, he was arrested, and the
police stripped the
studio of all recorded material.
The press was tipped beforehand, and next day's
The Daily Report
wrote that "Vice Squad investigators stilled the tape recorders
of a
free-swinging, a-go-go film and recording studio here Friday and
arrested
a self-styled movie producer"]
Zappa was charged with "conspiracy to commit
pornography".
This
felony
charge was reduced and he was sentenced to six
months in jail on a
misdemeanor, with all but ten days suspended.
His entrapment
and brief imprisonment left a permanent mark, and was key
in the formation of his
anti-authoritarian stance.Zappa lost several recordings made at Studio Z in the
process, as the
police only returned 30 out of 80 hours of tape seized.
Eventually
, he could no longer afford to pay the rent on the studio and
was evicted.
Zappa
managed to recover some of his possessions before the studio was
torn down in
1966.
Late
1960s: The Mothers of Invention
In 1965, Zappa was approached by
Ray Collins who asked him to join a local
R&B band, The Soul Giants,
as a guitarist.
Zappa accepted, and soon he assumed
leadership and the role as co-lead
singer (even though he never considered himself
a singer).
He convinced the other members that they should play his music to
i
ncrease the chances of getting a record contract.
The band was renamed The
Mothers, coincidentally on
Mother's Day.
The group increased their bookings
after beginning an association with
manager
Herb Cohen, while they gradually
gained attention on the burgeoning
Los Angeles
underground music scene.
In
early 1966, they were spotted by leading record producer
Tom Wilson when
playing "Trouble Every Day", a song about the
Watts Riots.
Wilson had earned
acclaim as the producer for singer-songwriter
Bob
Dylan and the folk-rock act
Simon & Garfunkel, and was notable as one of the few blacks working
as a major
label pop music producer at this time.
Wilson signed The Mothers to the
Verve Records division of
MGM Records,
which had built up a strong reputation in the
music industry for its releases of
modern jazz recordings in the
1940s and 1950s, but was attempting to diversify
into pop and rock
audiences. Verve insisted that the band officially re-title
themselves "The
Mothers of Invention" because "Mother", in slang terminology,
was
short for "motherfucker"—a
term that apart from its profane meanings can
denote a skilled musician.
[edit]
Debut album: Freak Out! (1966)
With Wilson credited as producer, The Mothers of Invention and a
studio orchestra
recorded the groundbreaking double album
Freak Out! (1966). It mixed R&B,
doo-wop,
musique concrète,
and experimental
sound collages that captured the
"freak" subculture of Los Angeles
at that time.
The album immediately established
Zappa as a radical new voice in rock
music, providing an antidote to the "relentless
consumer culture of
America"]
The sound was raw, but the
arrangements were s
ophisticated. (Some of the
session musicians were shocked that they should read
from
charts with Zappa conducting them, as this was not standard at a
rock
recording.)
The lyrics praised non-conformity, disparaged authorities, and had
dadaist
elements. Yet, there was a place for seemingly conventional love songs]
Most compositions are Zappa's, which set a precedent for the rest of his
recording
career. He had full control over the arrangements and musical
decisions and did
most
overdubs. Wilson provided the industry clout and connections to get
the
group the financial resources needed.
During the recording of Freak Out!, Zappa moved into a house
in
Laurel Canyon
with friend
Pamela Zarubica, who appeared on the album.
The house became a
meeting (and living) place for many LA musicians and
groupies
of the time, despite
Zappa's disapproval of their drug use.
He labeled people on drugs "assholes in
action", and he only tried
cannabis a few times without any pleasure.
He was a
regular
tobacco
smoker for most of his life, and strongly critical of anti-tobacco
campaigns.
After a short promotional tour following the release of Freak Out!,
Zappa met
Adelaide Gail Sloatman. He fell in love within "a couple of
minutes",
and she moved into the house over the summer.
They married in 1967, had four
children and remained together until
Zappa's death.
Wilson produced the follow-up album
Absolutely Free (1967), which was
recorded in November 1966, and
later
mixed in New York. It featured extended
playing by the Mothers of
Invention and focused on songs that defined Zappa's
compositional style
of introducing abrupt, rhythmical changes into songs that
were built
from diverse elements.
Examples are "Plastic People" and "Brown
Shoes Don't Make It", which
contained lyrics critical of the hypocrisy and
conformity of American
society, but also of the
counterculture of the 1960s.
As Zappa put it, "[W]e're satirists, and we are out to satirize
everything."At the
same time, Zappa had recorded material for a self-produced album
based on
orchestral works to be released under his own name. Due to
contractual
problems, the recordings were shelved and only made ready
for release late in
1967. Zappa took the opportunity to radically
restructure the contents, adding
newly recorded, improvised dialogue to
finalize what became his first solo
album (under the name Francis
Vincent Zappa),
Lumpy Gravy (1968)]
It is an
"incredible ambitious musical project",
a "monument to
John
Cage",
which
intertwines orchestral themes, spoken words and electronic noises
through
radical
audio editing techniques.
New York period (1966–1968)
The Mothers of Invention played in New York in late 1966 and were
offered a
contract at the Garrick Theater during Easter 1967. This
proved successful and
Herb Cohen extended the booking, which eventually
lasted half a year.
As a
result, Zappa and his wife, along with the Mothers of Invention,
moved to New
York.
Their shows became a combination of improvised acts showcasing
individual talents of the band as well as tight performances of Zappa's
music.
Everything was directed by Zappa's famous hand signals.
Guest performers and
audience participation became a regular part of the
Garrick Theater shows.
One evening, Zappa managed to entice some US
Marines from the audience onto
the stage, where they proceeded to
dismember a big baby doll, having been told
by Zappa to pretend that it
was a "gook
baby".
Situated in New York, and only interrupted by the band's first
European tour,
the Mothers of Invention recorded the album widely
regarded as the peak of the
group's late 1960s work,
We're Only in It for the Money (released 1968).
It
was produced by Zappa, with Wilson credited as executive producer.
From then
on, Zappa produced all albums released by the Mothers of
Invention and as a
solo artist. We're Only in It for the Money
featured some of the most creative
audio editing and production yet
heard in pop music, and the songs ruthlessly
satirized the
hippie
and
flower power phenomena.[75]
The cover photo parodied
that of
The Beatles'
Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.[76]
The cover art
was provided by
Cal Schenkel whom Zappa met in New York. This initiated a
life-long
collaboration in which Schenkel designed covers for numerous Zappa
and
Mothers albums.
Reflecting Zappa's eclectic approach to music, the next album,
Cruising with
Ruben & the Jets (1968), was very different. It
represented a collection of
doo-wop
songs; listeners and critics were not sure whether the album was a
satire or a tribute.
Zappa has noted that the album was conceived in the way
Stravinsky's
compositions were in his neo-classical period: "If he could take
the
forms and clichés of the classical era and pervert them, why not do the
same
... to doo-wop in the fifties?"
A theme from Stravinsky's
The Rite of Spring is
heard during one song.
In New York, Zappa increasingly used
tape editing as a compositional tool.
A
prime example is found on the double album
Uncle Meat (1969),
where the track
"King Kong" is edited from various studio and live
performances. Zappa had
begun regularly recording concerts,
and because of his insistence on precise
tuning and timing, he was able to augment his studio productions
with excerpts
from live shows, and vice versa.
Later, he combined recordings of different
compositions into new pieces,
irrespective of the
tempo or
meter of the sources.
He dubbed this process "xenochrony"
(strange synchronizations
)—reflecting the Greek "xeno" (alien or strange) and "chrono" (time).
Zappa
also evolved a compositional approach which he called "conceptual
continuity,"
meaning that any project or album was part of a larger
project. Everything
was connected, and musical themes and lyrics
reappeared in different form on
later albums. Conceptual continuity
clues are found throughout Zappa's entire
œuvre.
During the late 1960s, Zappa continued to develop the business sides
of his career
. He and Herb Cohen formed the
Bizarre Records and
Straight Records labels,
distributed by
Warner Bros. Records, as ventures to aid the funding of projects
and
to increase creative control. Zappa produced the double album
Trout Mask
Replica for
Captain Beefheart, and releases by
Alice Cooper,
Wild Man Fischer,
and
The
GTOs, as well as
Lenny Bruce's last live performance.
Disbanding the original Mothers of Invention (1969)
Zappa and the Mothers of Invention returned to Los Angeles in the
summer of
1968, and the Zappas moved into a house on Laurel Canyon
Boulevard, only to
move again to one on Woodrow Wilson Drive in the
autumn.[89]
This was to be
Zappa's home for the rest of his life. Despite being a
success with fans in Europe,
the Mothers of Invention were not faring
well financially.Their first records were
vocally oriented, but Zappa wrote more
instrumental jazz and classical oriented
music for the band's concerts,
which confused audiences. Zappa felt that
audiences failed to appreciate
his "electrical chamber music".
Zappa in Paris, early 1970s
In 1969 there were nine band members and Zappa
was supporting the
group himself from his publishing
royalties whether they played or not.
In late 1969,
Zappa broke up the band. He often cited the financial
strain as the main reason,
but also commented on the
band members' lack of sufficient effort.
Many band
members were bitter about Zappa's decision, and some
took it
as a sign of Zappa's preference for perfection
over feelings]
Others were irritated by "his
autocratic
ways",
which was manifested by the fact that Zappa
never stayed at the same
hotel as the band members.
Several members would, however, play for Zappa in
years to come.
Remaining recordings with the band from this period were
collected on
Weasels Ripped My Flesh and
Burnt Weeny Sandwich (both
released in 1970).
After he disbanded the Mothers of Invention, Zappa released the
acclaimed solo
album
Hot
Rats (1969).
It features, for the first time on record, Zappa playing
extended guitar
solos and contains one of his most enduring compositions,
"Peaches
en Regalia", which reappeared several times on future recordings.It
was backed by jazz, blues and R&B session players including violinist
Don "
Sugarcane" Harris, drummers John Guerin and
Paul Humphrey, multi-
instrumentalist and previous member of Mothers
of Invention
Ian Underwood,
and multi-instrumentalist
Shuggie Otis on bass, along with a guest appearance
by Captain
Beefheart (providing vocals to the only non-instrumental track,
"Willie
the Pimp"). It became a popular album in England]
and had a major
influence on the development of the
jazz-rock fusion genre.
1970s: From the Mothers to Zappa
In 1970 Zappa met conductor
Zubin Mehta. They arranged a May 1970 concert
where Mehta conducted
the
Los Angeles Philharmonic augmented by a rock
band. According to
Zappa, the music was mostly written in motel rooms while
on tour with
the Mothers of Invention. Some of it was later featured in the movie
200
Motels.
Although the concert was a success, Zappa's experience working
with a
symphony orchestra was not a happy one.
His dissatisfaction became a
recurring theme throughout his career,
where he often felt that the money spent
on performances of his
classical music rarely matched the final product.
Rebirth of the Mothers and film making (1970)
Later in 1970, Zappa formed a new version of The Mothers (from then
on, he
mostly dropped the "of Invention"). It included British drummer
Aynsley
Dunbar, jazz keyboardist
George Duke, Ian Underwood,
Jeff Simmons (bass,
rhythm guitar), and three members of
The Turtles: bass player
Jim
Pons, and
singers
Mark Volman and
Howard Kaylan, who, due to persistent legal and
contractual
problems, adopted the stage name "The Phlorescent Leech and
Eddie", or "Flo
& Eddie".
This version of the Mothers debuted on Zappa's next solo album
Chunga's Revenge (1970)]
which was followed by the double-album soundtrack
to the movie 200
Motels (1971), featuring The Mothers,
The
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra,
Ringo Starr,
Theodore Bikel, and
Keith Moon.
Co-directed by Zappa and
Tony Palmer, it was filmed in a week at
Pinewood Studios outside London.
Tensions between Zappa and several cast and
crew members arose before
and during shooting;]
co-director Palmer tried
afterwards to have his name removed from the
film.
The film deals loosely with
life on the road as a rock musician.It was the first feature film photographed
on
videotape and transferred to
35 mm film, a process which allowed for novel
visual effects]
It was released to mixed reviews.
The score relied extensively on
orchestral music, and Zappa's
dissatisfaction with the classical music world
intensified when a
concert, scheduled at the
Royal Albert Hall after filming,
was canceled because a
representative of the venue found some of the lyrics
obscene. In 1975,
he lost a lawsuit against the Royal Albert Hall for breach of
contract.
After 200 Motels, the band went on tour, which resulted in two
live albums,
Fillmore East - June 1971 and
Just Another Band From L.A.; the latter
included the 20-minute
track "Billy
the Mountain", Zappa's satire on rock
opera set in Southern
California. This track was representative of the band's
theatrical
performances in which songs were used to build up sketches
based on
200 Motels scenes as well as new situations often portraying the
band members' sexual encounters on the road.
Accident, attack and their aftermath (1971–1972)
In December 1971, there were two serious setbacks. While performing
at
Casino de Montreux in Switzerland, the Mothers' equipment was
destroyed
when a flare set off by an audience member started a fire that
burned down
the casino.
Immortalized in
Deep Purple's song "Smoke
on the Wat
, the event and immediate aftermath can be heard on the
bootleg album Swiss
Cheese/Fire, released legally as part of
Zappa's
Beat the Boots II compilation.
After a week's break, The Mothers
played at the
Rainbow Theatre, London,
with rented gear. During the encore, an
audience member pushed Zappa off
the stage and into the concrete-floored
orchestra pit. The band thought Zappa
had been killed—he had suffered
serious fractures, head trauma and injuries
to his back, leg, and neck,
as well as a crushed
larynx,
which ultimately caused
his voice to drop a
third after healing.
This left him wheelchair bound, forcing
him off the road for over half a
year. Upon his return to the stage in September
1972, he was still
wearing a leg brace, had a noticeable limp and could not stand
for very
long while on stage. Zappa noted that one leg healed "shorter than the
other" (a reference later found in the lyrics of songs "Zomby Woof" and
"Dancin' Fool"), resulting in chronic back pain
Meanwhile, the Mothers were left in limbo and eventually formed the
core of
Flo and Eddie's band as they set out on their own.
During 1971–1972 Zappa released two strongly jazz-oriented solo LPs,
Waka/Jawaka and
The Grand Wazoo, which were recorded during the forced
layoff
from concert touring, using floating line-ups of session players and
Mothers
alumni.
Musically, the albums were close to that of Hot Rats.[112]
Zappa began
touring again in late 1972.
His first effort was a series of concerts in September
1972 with a
20-piece
big
band referred to as the Grand Wazoo. This was followed
by a
scaled-down version known as the Petit Wazoo that toured the US for five
weeks from October to December 1972.
[edit]
Top
10 album (1973–1975)
Zappa then formed and toured with smaller groups that variously
included
Ian Underwood (reeds, keyboards),
Ruth Underwood (vibes, marimba), Sal
Marquez (trumpet, vocals),
Napoleon Murphy Brock (sax, flute and vocals),
Bruce Fowler (trombone),
Tom Fowler (bass),
Chester Thompson (drums),
Ralph Humphrey (drums), George Duke (keyboards, vocals), and
Jean-Luc Ponty (violin).
By 1973 the Bizarre and Straight labels were discontinued. In their
place,
Zappa and Cohen created
DiscReet Records, also distributed by Warner Bros.
Zappa continued a high rate of production through the first half of the
1970s, i
ncluding the solo album
Apostrophe (') (1974), which reached a career-high #10
on the
Billboard pop album charts
helped by the chart single "Don't Eat The
Yellow Snow]
Other albums from the period are
Over-Nite Sensation (1973),
which contained several future
concert favorites, such as "Dinah-Moe Humm"
and "Montana",
and the albums
Roxy & Elsewhere (1974) and
One Size Fits All
(1975) which feature ever-changing versions of
a band still called the Mothers,
and are notable for the tight
renditions of highly difficult
jazz fusion songs in s
uch pieces as "Inca
Roads", "Echidna's Arf (Of You)" and "Be-Bop Tango (Of
the Old
Jazzmen's Church)".
A live recording from 1974,
You Can't Do That on S
tage Anymore, Vol. 2 (1988), captures "the
full spirit and excellence of the
1973–75 band".
Zappa released
Bongo Fury (1975), which featured live
recordings from a tour
the same year that reunited him with
Captain Beefheart
for a brief period.
They later became estranged for a period of years, but were
in contact
at the end of Zappa's life.[edit]
Business breakups and touring
(1976–1979)
Zappa's relationship with long-time manager Herb Cohen ended in 1976.
Zappa
sued Cohen for skimming more than he was allocated from DiscReet
Records,
as well as for signing acts of which Zappa did not approve.
Cohen filed a
lawsuit against Zappa in return, which froze the money
Zappa and Cohen had
gained from an out-of-court settlement with MGM over
the rights of the early
Mothers of Invention recordings. It also
prevented Zappa access to any of his
previously recorded material during
the trials. Zappa therefore took his
personal master copies of the
rock-oriented
Zoot Allures (1976) directly to
Warner Bros., thereby bypassing DiscReet.
In the mid-1970s Zappa prepared material for
Läther
(pronounced "leather"),
a four-LP project. Läther encapsulated
all the aspects of Zappa's musical styles
—rock tunes, orchestral works,
complex instrumentals, and Zappa's own
trademark distortion-drenched
guitar solos. Wary of a quadruple-LP, Warner
Bros. Records refused to
release it.
Zappa managed to get an agreement with
Mercury-Phonogram, and test pressings were made targeted at a
Halloween
1977 release, but Warner Bros. prevented the release by
claiming rights over
the material.
Zappa responded by appearing on the
Pasadena, California radio
station
KROQ, allowing them to broadcast Läther and encouraging
listeners to
make their own tape recordings.
A lawsuit between Zappa and Warner Bros.
followed, during which no Zappa
material was released for more than a year.
Eventually, Warner Bros.
issued major parts of Läther against Zappa's will as
four
individual albums with limited
promotion.
Läther was released
posthumously in 1996.
Although Zappa eventually gained the rights to all his material
created under
the MGM and Warner Bros. contracts,
the various lawsuits meant that for a
period Zappa's only income came
from touring, which he therefore did extensively
in 1975–1977 with
relatively small, mainly rock-oriented, bands.
Drummer
Terry Bozzio became a regular band member, Napoleon Murphy Brock
stayed on
for a while, and original Mothers of Invention bassist
Roy Estrada joined. Among
other musicians were bassist
Patrick O'Hearn, singer-guitarist
Ray
White and
keyboardist
Eddie Jobson. In December 1976, Zappa appeared as a featured
musical
guest on the
NBC
television show
Saturday Night Live.The
performances included an impromptu musical collaboration with cast
member
John Belushi during the instrumental piece "The Purple Lagoon".
Belushi
appeared as his Samurai Futaba character playing the tenor sax
with Zappa
conducting.
Zappa's song, "I'm the Slime", was performed with a voice-over by
SNL
booth announcer
Don
Pardo, who also introduced "Peaches En Regalia"
on the same airing.
Zappa's band at the time, with the additions of Ruth U
nderwood and a
horn section (featuring
Michael and
Randy Brecker), performed during Christmas in New
York, recordings
of which appear on one of the albums
released by Warner Bros.,
Zappa in New York (1978).
It mixes intense instrumentals such as
"The
Black Page"
and humorous songs like "Titties and Beer".The former
composition, written originally for
drum
kit but later
developed for larger bands, is notorious for its
complexity in rhythmic structure,
radical changes of tempo and meter,
and short, densely arranged passages
Zappa in New York featured a song about sex criminal
Michael H. Kenyon,
"The Illinois Enema Bandit", which featured Don
Pardo providing the opening
narrative in the song. Like many songs on
the album, it contained numerous sexual
references,
leading to many critics objecting and being offended by the content.
Zappa dismissed the criticism by noting that he was a journalist
reporting on life
as he saw it.
Predating his later fight against censorship, he remarked: "What
do you
make of a society that is so primitive that it clings to the belief that
certain
words in its language are so powerful that they could corrupt
you the moment
you hear them?"
The remaining albums released by Warner Bros. Records
without Zappa's
consent were
Studio Tan in 1978 and
Sleep Dirt in 1979, which
contained complex suites of
instrumentally-based tunes recorded between 1973
and 1976, and which was
overlooked in the midst of the legal problems.
Also
released by the label without the artist's consent was
Orchestral Favorites in
1979, which featured recordings of a
concert with orchestral music from 1975.
[edit]
Zappa as an independent artist (1979)
Resolving the lawsuits successfully, Zappa ended the 1970s "stronger
than ever"
by releasing two of his most successful albums in 1979: the best selling
album of
his career,
Sheik Yerbouti,
and the "bona fide masterpiece",
Joe's Garage.
The
double album Sheik Yerbouti was the first release on
Zappa Records, and
contained the
Grammy-nominated single "Dancin' Fool", which reached #45
on the
Billboard charts,and "Jewish Princess", which received attention when
a Jewish lobby
group, the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL), attempted to prevent
the song from
receiving radio airplay due to its alleged
anti-Semitic lyrics.
Zappa
vehemently denied any anti-Semitic sentiments and dismissed the
ADL as a
"noisemaking organization that tries to apply pressure on
people in order to
manufacture a stereotype image of Jews that suits
their idea of a good time"
The
album's commercial success was attributable in part to "Bobby
Brown". Due to
its explicit lyrics about a young man's encounter
with a "dyke by the name of
Freddie", the song did not get airplay in
the US, but it topped the charts in several
European countries where
English is not the primary language.The triple LP
Joe's Garage featured lead singer
Ike
Willis as the voice of the character "Joe" in
a
rock opera about the danger of
political systems,
the suppression of
freedom of speech and music—inspired in part by the
Islamic revolution that
had made music illegal within its
jurisdiction at the time—and
about the
"strange relationship Americans have with sex and sexual
frankness".
The album
contains rock songs like "Catholic Girls" (a
riposte
to the controversies of
"Jewish Princess"),
"Lucille Has Messed My Mind Up", and the title track, as
well as
extended live-recorded guitar improvisations combined with a studio
backup band dominated by drummer
Vinnie Colaiuta (with whom Zappa had a
particularly good musical
rapport)
adopting the
xenochrony process. The
album contains one of Zappa's most famous
guitar "signature pieces",
"Watermelon in Easter Hay".
On December 21, 1979, Zappa's movie
Baby Snakes premiered in New York.
The movie's tagline was "A
movie about people who do stuff that is not normal".
The 2 hour and 40 minutes movie was based on footage from concerts in
New
York around Halloween 1977. It also contained several extraordinary
sequences
of
clay animation by
Bruce Bickford who had earlier provided animation sequences
to Zappa
for a 1974 TV special (which later become available on the video
The Dub Room Special (1982)).]
The movie did not do well in theatrical distribution,
but won the Premier Grand Prix at the First International Music Festival
in Paris in
1981. The Zappa Family Trust released it on DVD, and it has
been available since
2003.
Zappa later expanded on his television appearances in a non-musical
role. He was
an actor or voice artist in episodes of
Shelley Duvall's Faerie Tale Theatre,
Miami
Vice
and
The Ren and Stimpy Show]
A voice part in
The Simpsons never
materialized, to creator
Matt Groening's disappointment
1980s:
Productive as ever
After spending most of 1980 on the road, Zappa released
Tinsel Town Rebellion in
1981. It was the first release on his
own
Barking Pumpkin Records,
and it
contains songs taken from a 1979 tour, one studio track and
material from the
1980 tours. The album is a mixture of complicated
instrumentals and Zappa's use
of
sprechstimme (speaking song or voice)—a compositional technique
utilized by
such composers as
Arnold Schoenberg and
Alban Berg—showcasing some of the
most accomplished bands Zappa ever
had (mostly featuring drummer
Vinnie
Colaiuta).
While some lyrics still raised controversy among critics, in the sense
that some found them sexist,
the political and sociological satire in songs like the
title track and
"The Blue Light" have been described as a "hilarious critique of the
willingness of the American people to believe anything".[155]
The album is also
notable for the presence of guitar
virtuoso
Steve
Vai, who joined Zappa's touring
band in the fall of 1980.
The same year the double album
You Are What You Is was released. Most of it was
recorded in
Zappa's brand new
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen (UMRK) studios,
which were located
at his house,
thereby giving him complete freedom to work.
The
album included one complex instrumental, "Theme from the 3rd
Movement of
Sinister Footwear", but focused mainly on rock songs with
Zappa's sardonic social
commentary—satirical lyrics targeted at
teenagers, the media, and religious and
political hypocrisy.
"Dumb All Over" is a tirade on religion, as is "Heavenly Bank
Account",
wherein Zappa rails against
TV evangelists such as
Jerry Falwell and
Pat Robertson for their purported influence on the US administration
as well as
their use of religion as a means of raising money]
Songs like "Society Pages"
and "I'm a Beautiful Guy" show Zappa's dismay
with the /span>
Reaganite era and its
"obscene pursuit of wealth and happiness".
|
The title track on Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar
features Zappa's guitar improvisations.
|
|
In 1981, Zappa also released three instrumental albums,
Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar, Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar
Some
More, and The Return of the Son of Shut Up 'N
Play Yer Guitar,
which were initially sold via mail
order, but later released through the
CBS label due
to
popular demand.
The albums focus exclusively on
Frank Zappa as a guitar soloist, and the
tracks are
predominantly live recordings from 1979–1980; they
highlight
Zappa's improvisational skills with "beautiful
performances from the
backing group as well".
Another
guitar-only album,
Guitar, was released in 1988, and a
third,
Trance-Fusion, which Zappa completed shortly before his death,
was released
in 2006.
From hit single to classical performances
In May 1982, Zappa released
Ship Arriving Too Late to Save a Drowning Witch,
which featured
his biggest selling single ever, the
Grammy Award-nominated
song
"Valley
Girl" (topping out at #32 on the
Billboard charts).
In her improvised lyrics
to the song, Zappa's daughter
Moon Unit satirized the vapid speech of teenage girls
from the
San Fernando Valley, which popularized many "Valspeak"
expressions
such as "gag me with a spoon," "fer sure, fer sure," "grody"
(gross), and "barf out".
Most Americans who only knew Zappa from his few singles successes now
thought
of him as a person writing "novelty
songs", even though the rest of the album
contained highly
challenging music.
Zappa was irritated by this
and never played
the song live.
In 1983, two different projects were released, beginning with
The Man From Utopia,
a rock-oriented work. The album is
eclectic, featuring the vocal-led "Dangerous
Kitchen" and "The Jazz
Discharge Party Hats", both continuations of the
sprechstimme excursions
on Tinseltown Rebellion. The second album,
London
Symphony Orchestra, Vol. 1, contained orchestral Zappa
compositions conducted
by
Kent Nagano and performed by the
London Symphony Orchestra. A second
record of these sessions,
London Symphony Orchestra, Vol. 2 was released in 1987.
The
material was recorded under a tight schedule with Zappa providing all
funding
, helped by the commercial success of "Valley Girl".
Zappa was not satisfied with the
LSO recordings. One reason is "Strictly
Genteel", which was recorded after the
trumpet section had been out for
drinks on a break: the track took 40 edits to hide
out-of-tune notes.
Conductor Nagano, who was pleased with the experience, noted
that in
"fairness to the orchestra, the music is humanly very, very difficult".
Some reviews noted that the recordings were the best representation
of Zappa's
orchestral work so far.
In 1984 Zappa teamed again with Nagano and the Berkeley
Symphony
Orchestra for a live performance of A Zappa Affair with augmented
orchestra, life-size puppets, and moving stage sets. Although critically
acclaimed
the work was a financial failure, and only performed twice.
For the remainder of his career, much of Zappa's work was influenced
by his use of
the
Synclavier as a compositional and performance tool. Even considering
the
complexity of the music he wrote, the Synclavierhe could dream up.
The
Synclavier could be programmed to play almost anything conceivable,
to
perfection: "With the Synclavier, any group of imaginary instruments
can be i
nvited to play the most difficult passages ... with
one-millisecond accuracy—every
time".
Even though it essentially did away with the need for musicians,
Zappa
viewed the Synclavier and real-life musicians as separate.
In 1984, he released four
albums.
Boulez Conducts Zappa: The Perfect Stranger, contains orchestral
works
commissioned and conducted by world-renowned conductor
Pierre Boulez (who
was listed as an influence on Freak Out!)
and performed by his
Ensemble
InterContemporain, juxtaposed with premiere Synclavier
pieces. Again, Zappa
was not satisfied with the performances of his
orchestral works as he found them
under-rehearsed, but in the album
liner notes he respectfully thanks Boulez's
demands for precision.The Synclavier pieces stood in contrast to the orchestral
works, as the
sounds were electronically generated and not, as became possible
shortly
thereafter,
sampled.
The album
Thing-Fish was an ambitious three-record set in the style of a
Broadway play dealing with a
dystopian "what-if" scenario involving feminism,
homosexuality,
manufacturing and distribution of the AIDS virus, and a
eugenics program conducted by the United States government.
New vocals
were combined with previously released tracks and new
Synclavier music; "the
work is an extraordinary example of
bricolage".Finally, in 1984, Zappa
released
Francesco Zappa, a Synclavier rendition of works by 18th century
composer
Francesco Zappa (no known relation), and
Them or Us, a two-
record set of heavily edited live and session
pieces.
Senate testimony
On September 19, 1985, Zappa testified before the
United States Senate
Commerce, Technology, and Transportation
committee, attacking the
Parents Music Resource Center or
PMRC, a music organization, co-founded
by
Tipper Gore, former wife of then-senator
Al Gore.
The PMRC consisted
of many wives of politicians, including the wives of
five members of the
committee, and was founded to address the issue of
song lyrics with sexual
or satanic content.
Zappa saw their activities as on a path towards
censorship,
and called their proposal for voluntary
labelling of records
with explicit content "extortion" of the music
industry.
In his prepared
statement, he said:
The PMRC proposal is an ill-conceived piece of nonsense which
fails
to deliver any real benefits to children, infringes the civil
liberties of
people who are not children, and promises to keep the
courts busy for
years dealing with the interpretational and
enforcemental problems
inherent in the proposal's design. It is my
understanding that, in law,
First Amendment issues are decided with
a preference for the least
restrictive alternative. In this context,
the PMRC's demands are the
equivalent of treating dandruff by
decapitation ... The establishment
of a rating system, voluntary or
otherwise, opens the door to an
endless parade of moral quality
control programs based on things
certain Christians do not like.
What if the next bunch of Washington
wives demands a large yellow
"J" on all material written or
performed by Jews, in order to save
helpless children from exposure
to concealed Zionist doctrine?
Zappa set excerpts from the PMRC hearings to Synclavier music in his
composition "Porn Wars" on the 1985 album
Frank Zappa Meets the
Mothers of Prevention. Zappa is heard
interacting with Senators
Fritz
Hollings,
Slade Gorton,
Al Gore
(who claimed, at the hearing, to be a
Zappa fan), and in an exchange
with Florida Senator
Paula Hawkins
over what toys Zappa's children played with. Zappa
expressed opinions
on censorship when he appeared on
CNN's
Crossfire TV series and
debated issues with Washington Times
commentator
John Lofton in 1986.
Zappa's passion for American politics was becoming a bigger part of his
life. He had always encouraged his fans to
register to vote on album covers
, and throughout 1988 he had
registration booths at his concerts.
He even considered running for
President of the United States.
[edit]
Digital
medium and last tour
Around 1986, Zappa undertook a comprehensive re-release program of
his
earlier vinyl recordings.
He personally oversaw the remastering of all his
1960s, 1970s and early
1980s albums for the new digital
compact disc
medium.
Certain aspects of these re-issues were, however, criticized by
some
fans as being unfaithful to the original recordings.
Nearly twenty
years before the advent of online music stores, Zappa had
proposed to
replace "phonographic record merchandising" of music by
"direct digital
-to-digital transfer" through phone or cable TV (with
royalty payments
and consumer billing automatically built into the
accompanying software).
In 1989, Zappa considered his idea a "miserable flop".
The album
Jazz From Hell, released in 1986, earned Zappa his first
Grammy Award in 1987 for
Best Rock Instrumental Performance. Except
for one live guitar solo
(St. Etienne), the album exclusively featured
compositions brought to
life by the Synclavier. Although an
instrumental
album, Meyer Music Markets sold Jazz from Hell
featuring an "explicit
lyrics" sticker—a warning label introduced by the
Recording Industry
Association of America in an agreement with the
PMRC.
Zappa's last tour in a rock and jazz band format took place in 1988
with a
12-piece group which had a repertoire of over 100 (mostly Zappa)
compositions, but which split under acrimonious circumstances before the
tour was completed.
The tour was documented on the albums
Broadway
the Hard Way (new material featuring songs with strong
political
emphasis),
The Best Band You Never Heard in Your Life (Zappa
"standards"
and an eclectic collection of cover tunes, ranging from
Maurice Ravel's
Boléro
to
Led Zeppelin's "Stairway
to Heaven"),
and
Make a Jazz Noise Here (mostly instrumental and
avant-
garde music). Parts are also found on You Can't Do That on
Stage
Anymore, volumes
4 and
6.
1990s:
Classical music and death
In early 1990, Zappa visited
Czechoslovakia at the request of President
Václav Havel, and was asked to serve as consultant for the
government on
trade, cultural matters and tourism. Havel was a lifelong
fan of Zappa who
had large influence in the avant-garde and underground
scene in
Central
Europe in the 1970s and 1980s (a
Czech rock group that was imprisoned in
1976 took its name from
Zappa's 1968 song "Plastic
People").
Zappa
enthusiastically agreed and began meeting with corporate officials
interested in investing in Czechoslovakia. Within a few weeks, however,
the US administration put pressure on the Czech government to withdraw
the appointment. Havel made Zappa an unofficial
cultural attaché instead.
Zappa also planned to develop an international consulting enterprise to
facilitate trade between the former Eastern Bloc and Western businesses.
|
One of Zappa's work for Synclavier on Civilization,
Phaze III, cited as his "last great work."[191]
|
|
Most of Zappa's projects came to a halt in 1990,
when he was
diagnosed with terminal
prostate
cancer. The disease had been developing
unnoticed for ten
years and was considered
inoperable.
After his diagnosis, Zappa devoted
most of his energy to modern
orchestral and
Synclavier works. In 1993 he completed
Civilization, Phaze III shortly before his death.
It was a major
Synclavier work which he had
begun in the 1980s.
In 1991, Zappa was chosen to be one of four featured composers at the
world-
acclaimed Frankfurt Festival in 1992 (the others were
John
Cage,
Karlheinz
Stockhausen and
Alexander Knaifel).
Zappa was approached by the German
chamber ensemble,
Ensemble Modern, which was interested in playing his
music for the
event. Although ill, Zappa invited them to Los Angeles for
rehearsals of
new compositions and new arrangements of older material.
In
addition to being satisfied with the ensemble's performances of his
music,
Zappa also got along with the musicians, and the concerts in
Germany and
Austria were set up for the fall.
In September 1992, the concerts went ahead
as scheduled, but Zappa could
only appear at two in Frankfurt due to illness.
At the first concert, he
conducted the opening "Overture", and the final "G-
Spot Tornado" as well
as the theatrical "Food Gathering in Post-Industrial
America, 1992" and
"Welcome to the United States" (the remainder of the
program was
conducted by the ensemble's regular conductor Peter Rundel).
Zappa
received a 20-minute ovation.
It would become his last professional
public appearance, as the cancer
was spreading to such an extent that he
was in too much pain to enjoy an
event that he otherwise found "exhilarating"
Recordings from the concerts appeared on
The Yellow Shark (1993), Zappa's
last release during his
lifetime, and some material from studio rehearsals
appeared on the
posthumous
Everything Is Healing Nicely (1999).
Frank Zappa died on Saturday, December 4, 1993 in his home surrounded
by his wife and children. At a private ceremony the following day, Zappa
was interred in an unmarked grave at the
Westwood Village Memorial Park
Cemetery in
Westwood, Los Angeles.
On Monday, December 6 his family
publicly announced that "Composer Frank
Zappa left for his final tour just
before 6:00 pm on Saturday".
Legacy
Acclaim and honors
Frank Zappa was one of the first to otry tearing down the
barriers between
rock, jazz, and classical msic. In the later Sixties, his Mothers of
Invention
would slip from Straviosky's "Petroushka" into the Dovells' "Bristol
Stomp"
before breaking down into saxaphone squals inspired by Albert Ayler.
The Rolling Stone Illustrated History of Rock % Roll
Zappa earned widespread critical acclaim in his lifetime and after
his death.
The 2004 Rolling Stone Album Guide writes: "Frank
Zappa dabbled in
virtually all kinds of music—and, whether guised as a
satirical rocker,
jazz-rock fusionist, guitar virtuoso, electronics
wizard, or orchestral innovator,
his eccentric genius was undeniable".
Even though his work drew inspiration
from many different genres, Zappa
was seen establishing a coherent and
personal expression. In 1971,
biographer David Walley noted that "The whole
structure of his music is
unified, not neatly divided by dates or time sequences
and it is all
building into a composite".
On commenting on Zappa's music,
politics and philosophy,
Barry Miles noted in 2004 that they cannot be
separated: "It was all
one; all part of his 'conceptual continuity'".
333
Frank Zappa playing his famous
Gibson SG barechested in 1977
Guitar Player Magazine devoted a special issue
to Zappa in
1992, and asked on the cover "Is
FZ America's Best Kept Musical Secret?"
Editor Don Menn remarked that the issue was
about "The most important
composer to come
out of modern popular music".Among those
contributing to the issue was composer and
musicologist
Nicolas Slonimsky, who conducted
premiere performances of works of
Ives and
Varèse in the 1930s.
He became friends with
Zappa in the 1980s,
and said "I admire
everything Frank does, because he practically
created
the new musical millennium. He does
beautiful, beautiful work ... It has
been my luck
to have lived to see the emergence of this totally
new type
of music."
Conductor Kent Nagano remarked in the same issue that
"Frank is a
genius. That's a word I 3don't use often ... In Frank's case it is not
too strong ... He is extremely literate musically. I'm not sure if the
general
public knows that".
Pierre Boulez stated in Musi3cian Magazine's posthumous
Zappa
tribute article that Zappa "was an exceptional figure because he was
part of the worlds of rock and classical music and that both types of
his work
would survive."
Many music scholars acknowledge Zappa as one of the most
influential
composers of his generationAs an electric guitarist, he has become
highly regarded.
In 1994, jazz magazine
Down
Beat's critics poll placed Zappa in its Hall of Fame.
Zappa was posthumously inducted into the
Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1995.
There, it was written that
"Frank Zappa was rock and roll's sharpest musical
mind and most astute
social critic. He was the most prolific composer of his age,
and he
bridged genres—rock, jazz, classical, avant-garde and even novelty
music
—with masterful ease".
He received the
Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award
in 1997.
In 2005, the US
National Recording Preservation Board included We're
Only in It
for the Money in the
National Recording Registry as "Frank Zappa's
inventive and
iconoclastic album presents a unique political stance, both
anti-
conservative and anti-counterculture, and features a scathing
satire on
hippiedom and America's reactions to it".
The same year,
Rolling Stone
magazine ranked him 71 on its list of the 100
Greatest Artists of All Time.
[edit]
Artists
influenced by Zappa
A number of notable musicians, bands and orchestras from diverse
genres have
been influenced by Frank Zappa's music. Rock artists like
Alice Cooper,Primus,
Fee Waybill of
The
Tubes
all cite Zappa's influence, as do progressive rock
artists like
Henry
Cow,
Trey Anastasio of
Phish,
and
John Frusciante.
Paul McC
artney regarded
Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band as
The Beatles' Freak
Out!
Heavy rock and metal acts like
Black Sabbath,
Mike Portnoy,
Warren
DeMartini,
Steve
Vai,
System of a Down,
and
Clawfinger
acknowledge Zappa's
inspiration. On the classical music scene, Tomas
Ulrich,
Meridian Arts
Ensemble,
and the
Fireworks Ensemble
regularly perform Zappa's compositions
and quote his influence.
Contemporary jazz musicians and composers
Bill
Frisell
and
John Zorn
are inspired by Zappa, as is funk legend
George
Clinton.
Other artists whose work is affected by Zappa include new age pianist
George Winston,
electronic composer
Bob Gluck,
parody singer
"Weird Al"
Yankovic,
and
noise music artist Masami Akita of
Merzbow.
Metal musician
Devin Townsend has also cited Zappa as influence.
THE CONCRETE CLARITY OF UNVARSISHED TRUTH3
from
Daily Kos on 09 July 2006 11:04:01 AM. © Daily Kos
Ah, Sunday. A day when perfectly-powdered politicians take to the
morning
shows and speak directly to the American people.
Well, they speak. I see their lips moving, I see their faces get
flushed as they
utter their perfectly-framed buzzwords. But are they
speaking directly to the
American people?
Political discourse today, whether it takes place on the Senate floor
or on
Sunday talk, is slathered with slogans and tired catch-phrases.
It's saturated
with bullshit. It's bloated. It's fat. It's
ineffective. Great ideas and practical
solutions are buried under the
avalanche of platitudes that inevitably pour of
every politicians mouth,
so that every politician regardless of his character
ends up sounding
the exact same.
Let's travel back in time to a real no-spin zone. In 1933, Franklin
D. Roosevelt
was handed the keys to the White House at a time of
national peril, the Great
Depression. In his
inauguration speech, Roosevelt spoke plainly to the America
people.
He revealed the whole truth, "frankly and boldly":
I am certain that my fellow Americans expect that on my induction
into the
Presidency I will address them with a candor and a
decision which the
present situation of our Nation impels. This is
preeminently the time to speak
the truth, the whole truth, frankly
and boldly. Nor need we shrink from
honestly facing
conditions in our country today. This great Nation will
endure as it
has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me
assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear
itself--
nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes
needed efforts to
convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour
of our national life a
leadership of frankness and vigor has met
with that understanding and
support of the people themselves which
is essential to victory. I am
convinced that you will again give
that support to leadership in these
critical days.
"This Nation asks for action, and action now," he said, and proceeded
to state
his solution in beautifully simple terms: putting people to
work. What strikes
me most about his speech is how he knew at a time
when the nation was
starving for leadership, talking down to the
American people or talking past
them with platitudes was not the
answer. Roosevelt followed his frank talk
with an offering of hope:
We do not distrust the future of essential democracy. The people of
the U
nited States have not failed. In their need they have
registered a mandate
that they want direct, vigorous action. They
have asked for discipline and
direction under leadership. They have
made me the present instrument
of their wishes. In the spirit of the
gift I take it.
This formula is what leadership is about: speaking to people as a
person, not
a politician. It's about leveling with them and
speaking to them with a
recognition that they are capable of
handling the unvarnished truth about the
state of our nation. We need to
speak with concrete clarity. The American
people are grow9n-ups who can
handle the unvarnished truth. They will be
more willing to jump on
board with practical solutions when they're invited
to sit at the table
with authentic people they can trust.
Everything else sounds like an empty campaign speech.
So put your Roosevelt hat on. When you speak to your fellow
Americans
about why they should get out and vote Democratic this fall,
what will you
say? Will you repeat tired talking points or will you
connect with them on a
personal level? How will you describe to them
the state of our nation? And,
above all, how will you convince them that
voting Democratic is the most
practical solution of all?
froim:
http://leftword.blogdig.net/archives/articles/July2006/09/Th
e_Concrete_Clarity_of_Unvarnished_Truth.html
Oprah says Obama's tongue 'dipped in the unvarnished truth'
- note that this article was written BEFORE the election.
Oprah says Obama's tongue 'dipped in the unvarnished truth'
Dan Gearino
The Quad-City Times
|
Posted:
Saturday, December 8, 2007 12:00 am |
-
size
Democratic presidential
candidate and U.S. Sen. Barack Obama,
D-Ill., speaks to
a crowd of thousands in Des Moines after Oprah Winfrey
delivered a speech on the fellow Chicagoan's behalf
Saturday.
(AP PHOTO)
DES MOINES – The church of Oprah Winfrey was in session
Saturday,
drawing thousands of Iowans to hear her say why she
supports Barack
Obama for president.
“When you listen to Barack Obama, when you really hear him,
you witness
a very rare thing,” she said in Des Moines. “You
witness a politician who
has an ear for eloquence and a tongue
dipped in the unvarnished truth.”
Winfrey, the television talk show host from Obama’s hometown
of Chicago,
stood at a podium on a small riser, with the crowd
around her on all sides.
Obama’s staff said 18,500 people were
present, which would make it the
largest Iowa event held for a
single candidate this year.
In an afternoon rich with religious allusions, Winfrey began
by saying she’s
nervous in her new role as a political advocate.
“It feels like I’m out of my pew, I’m out of my terrain,” she
said.
Obama supporters hope Winfrey’s star power will help their
candidate win
over undecided voters, particularly undecided
women. The U.S. senator from
Illinois is locked in a close race
in Iowa with U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y
., and former North
Carolina Senator John Edwards.
The audience traveled through freezing rain to get to Hy-Vee
Hall in downtown
Des Moines. The event was the first stop on a
trip that will continue over the
next few days in New Hampshire
and South Carolina.
Nedra Sparland, a retired federal employee from Johnston,
wore a badge
identifying her as a precinct captain for Obama.
She said she’s never
volunteered for a candidate before.
“It’s pretty darn exciting,” she said, as the crowd formed
long lines to enter
the hall.
Gordon Fischer of Des Moines, an Obama supporter and the
former chairman
of the Iowa Democratic Party, said Winfrey
brought more excitement than he
has ever seen at a political
event in Iowa.
“I know this is totally sacrilegious and I should not say
this, but the only thing
I can compare this to is when the Pope
visited Iowa,” Fischer said, referring
to Pope John Paul II’s
visit in 1979.
Obama took the stage after his wife Michelle and after
Winfrey.
“You know you’ve got a pretty good show when I’m the
third-best speaker,”
he said.
He gave a revised version of his speech from last month’s
Jefferson Jackson
Dinner in Des Moines. He said he would value
good ideas over poll-driven
ideas.
“We can’t have a timid politics. We need a bold politics,” he
said.
Dan Gearino can be reached at 515-243-0138 and
dan.gearino@lee.net.
Copyright 2010 The Quad-City Times. All rights reserved.
Posted in
Local on
Saturday, December 8, 2007 12:00 am
FROM:
http://qctimes.com/news/local/article_af9c9ab4-6b7a-5be7-8425-
57c53103d78b.html
|
By Robert Ringer
Feb. 8, 2010
As the U.S. edges ever closer to coming face to face
with the consequences
of its $100+ trillion of debt and
"unfunded liabilities," the cries from the
never-give-up-the-fight progressives over "unfettered"
capitalism are
becoming increasingly louder. The
coalition of communists, Marxists,
socialists,
progressives (a.k.a. "liberals") - along with those who
are simply
envious, ignorant, or angry - are calling for
capitalist scalps.
They say that the worsening depression
(euphemistically referred to by
politicians and media
pundits as "recession" - and one that is on the verge
of
a rebound, at that) is a result of capitalism run amok.
More regulation
and more redistribution of wealth is the
only thing that can save America
, right? Not quite.
If you want to give a true-believing progressive
apoplexy, just tell him the
unvarnished truth: The
overriding reason that the United States has
devolved
into a financial basket case is too
much regulation, too
much
taxation, too
much
printing of fiat currency, too
much
borrowing, too
much government interference in
the marketplace, too much
nannyism.
You can go right down the list - Social Security,
Medicare, Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families - all
of these programs drain capital from
the productive free
market, which makes everyone worse off. Another
unvarnished truth, one that very few people want to
hear, is: The
government has no Constitutional - or
moral
- authority to operate any
wealth-transfer
program, no matter how worthy some people may believ
e it
to be. Unfortunately, the idea that a politician's
self-proclaimed
compassion gives him the right to take
the property of law-abiding citizens
and give it to
others is a perversity that has come to be accepted by a
large
percentage of the population.
A few politicians dance around the edges of this
issue, but none seem to
be willing to speak out on it
unequivocally, which is why the tea party
movement is so
refreshing. Many politicians have finally said that
they've
heard the message of the tea party people loud
and clear. But, in truth,
they haven't.
Even Sarah Palin, whose basic ideology seems to be
pretty much on
target, avoided being specific in her
keynote address at the tea party
convention in
Nashville. Like all other conservatives, Governor Palin
said that government has to cut spending, which is fine.
But, also like all
other conservatives, she did not
specifically mention Social Security and
Medicare, the
two programs that, all by themselves, are 100 percent
guaranteed to bankrupt America - no matter what other
spending
rollbacks government implements.
I'll cut the governor some slack here, because it
probably wasn't a good
time for her to get specific and
take on the sacred cows. But hear me on
this,
Washington: Sooner or later, someone is going to have to
get serious
with a public that is addicted to nanny
statism - a public that doesn't want
to hear about
economic reality, much less morality.
So I end this article with the same question
(borrowed from an article by
Thomas Friedman, no less)
I've asked many times before: Who will tell
the people
the truth? Right now, no politician has the courage to
advocate
the phasing out of
all wealth-redistribution programs, because they do not
believe there is a constituency for cutting
entitlements. (Note that I used
the term
phasing out
, because to pull the rug out from under Social
Security
and Medicare recipients cold turkey would cause
too much pain and
suffering.)
Which is why the tea party people are probably
America's last hope. What
I believe most of the tea
party people are saying is "No!" - no to
any
kind
of wealth redistribution ... no to
any
kind of government involvement in
health care ... no to
any
kind of tax increases ... no to
any
kind of "green"
legislation ... no to
any
kind of new regulations. No! No! No!
If so, strong voices in the tea party movement must
speak up and deliver
that message loud and clear to both
politicians and voters. If they do not,
or if a majority
of voters will not accept it, then the question will be
not
if, but when, the U.S. will experience a
complete
financial collapse - and A
mericans will
lose what is left of their freedom.
Admittedly, it's a tough message to deliver to
everyday Americans, but
someone must be willing not only
to step forward and do it, but explain,
in clear,
easy-to-understand terms, why it is not in their best
interest to
continue to receive government benefits of
any kind. Put simply, the public
has to be taught that
the price of unsustainable wealth-redistribution
programs is servitude. And, like it or not, that's the
unvarnished truth.
From
blog.robertringer.com/2010/02/08/the-unvarnished-truth-2
|
|
|
|
A few politicians dance around the edges of this
issue, but none seem to
be willing to speak out on it
unequivocally...
AIP leaders do it every day.
And the writer, God love him, cuts Sarah Palin way
too much slack, in
my opinion.
|
|
|
|
From
the America's Independent Party Platform :
Restoring limited government
We seek to restore the intended balance between the
three separate
branches of our government, and to
strictly limit government to the
Enumerated Powers
granted and expressed by the will of the people
of the
United States in our Constitution.
All existing functions of the Executive branch that are
outside of those
Enumerated Powers must be eliminated.
All spending and regulation by the Legislative branch
that lies outside
the Enumerated Powers must cease.
Judges who attempt to legislate from the bench, or who
abandon the
clear principles of our Constitution, must
be checked if liberty and j
ustice are to prevail in our
society once again.
We demand a return to adherence to the provisions of the
Tenth
Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United
States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the
States, are reserved to the
States respectively, or to
the people."
|
|
|
|
|
The Bear on
Oct 31 2006 at 8:28 am | Filed under:
Uncategorized
My friends,
What follows below is a note from an Air Force reservist to the
squadron
mates he is leaving behind. His words are inspiring to the
squadron, and
to stateside Americans who seek the unvarnished truth.
As I head out to wrap-up my five month active reserve tour, I am
sad to
notice a certain questioning about the direction of the War
on Terrorism.
So I have something to say to my fellow military
members as I walk out
the door, and it�s something I feel must be
voiced. Please bear with me,
as this has been on my mind often in
the last few weeks.
Every day we hear on the news about another bombing in Baghdad,
or
about unrest on the Pakistani border to Afghanistan. Recently,
another five
soldiers were killed in Iraq and sectarian violence is
threatening to rip the
country apart. And the question that keeps
being asked is, �Can we win this?
�
A simple
question, but one that is entirely misguided. We�ve already won
our
fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. The only question left is �How far
can we
take our victory?�
Never again will Al-Queda use Afghanistan to train and send
terrorists to
attack our homeland. Women now hold elected positions
in the country and
are going to school, homosexuals aren�t being
killed by having walls collapsed
upon them, children can fly kites
with their fathers in fields without being
beaten, people may now
listen to music, adults vote in a representative
government, and the
soccer fields are now used for games instead of mass
executions.
Never again will Saddam Hussein use his once-large army to invade
his
neighbors. The Kurds will not be gassed with WMDs, and have
turned their
portion of the country into the safest part of Iraq.
The two sons of Saddam,
Uday and Qusay, will never again patrol the
streets of Baghdad looking for
women to abduct. The Hussein�s will
never again oversee the dropping of
their enemies into human-sized
shredders, nor will they ever house
international terrorists in
their country as guests. Terrorists such as Abu
Nidal, who killed
over 900 people in 20 countries and who was a guest living
in Iraq
for nearly a decade. And al-Zarqawi, the Iraqi al-Queda leader who
fled to Iraq after our invasion of Afghanistan, obtained medical
treatment
under direction of Uday, and is now taking the eternal
dirtnap.
Sometimes it doesn�t seem like a victory, especially since
al-Queda
appointed a new leader in Iraq to continue the war. But we
know his name
and we know his face, and his time will also come. And
as tiring as the
violence in the Middle East may be, we must
acknowledge that we�ve moved
the forward edge of the battlefield
from the skyline of downtown New York
City to the territory of the
enemy. This may be our greatest victory.
So where do we go from here? How do we capitalize on our
achievement of
removing two despotic regimes placed on the opposite
end of the globe in the
course of several years? By giving the
Afghan and Iraqi people their shot at r
epublican democracy. Note
that I did not say by creating democracy in Iraq
and Afghanistan,
because that can only be done by the citizens, and can never
be
imposed. That is the moral strength of what we are trying to
accomplish;
to come as saviors and not as an empire. It took our
country eight years to win
our own Revolutionary War, and four years
later we had to create a new
constitution before we could make it
work. The French Revolution took longer
than two decades, and
failed, returning the country back into a monarchy.
The Afghans have
had five years to attempt the same; the Iraqis three.
I�m not a predictor of the future. I�m not a seer. Maybe the
nascent Afghan
and Iraqi governments will fall into chaos. Maybe the
will of the people will be
to slaughter one another, neighbor
against neighbor, cousin against cousin. But
for now our fellow
brothers and sisters in uniform are performing amazing
feats
everyday to give those citizens their one shot at achieving a way of
life that
those regions have never known in all their existence. And
should it fail- should
chaos tear their countries apart- there will
be people who will dream of a time
when their voices were
represented by those who governed, and a time when a
statue of a
tyrant was pulled down and people came from the voting booths
while
raising purple-stained hands in pride. And maybe those memories will
allow for the next generation to step forward when their forebears
did not.
But if they do succeed now? Then the band of authoritarian
countries that wrap
around the world from Morocco to Indonesia will
have been sliced, and many of
the world�s tyrants will sleep
uneasily in fear for the rights that their own people
will demand.
For this I pray.
As for me, I have nothing but pride in what my country has done,
and for what it
is attempting to do during these chaotic times.
Instead of sitting back, we are
attempting to change the world for
the better, and are making the conscious
decision to try to actively
engage the world instead of the passive, depressed
manner of other
nations. Whether we succeed in establishing democracy in the
region
or if we fail, we entered with the righteous intention of keeping
our
civilians safe, and the enlightened hope of freeing people
locked in servitude to
the vicious and brutal elements in their
midst. When my daughter grows up,
in whatever uncertain state the
world will be in, I know I can look her in the
eyes and say that I
was there during the initial chaotic years of the new
millennia, and
that I fought to leave the world a better place than I had found
it.
For this opportunity that my country has given me, and for the honor
to
serve alongside the greatest military servicemen in the world, I
will always be
proud.
Related
Hamas’ Must-See TV By Cliff May
Hamas may not have funds to pay the salaries of civil servants
and improve
social services for Palestinians. But resources to fund
its propaganda efforts?
That, evidently, is not a problem. This
month, the terrorist organization that
governs Gaza and the West
Bank launched a satellite television station.
The new station will be broadcast by Arabsat, majority-owned by
the Saudi
government. Arabsat, along with Nilesat, owned by the
Egyptian government,
already distribute the programming of Al Manar,
the television station of
Hezbollah.
Hamas, Hezbollah and Al Manar have all been officially designated
by the U.S.
government as terrorist entities. Meanwhile, the Saudi
government runs
commercials in the U.S. claiming to be America’s
�ally� in the War on
Terrorism. And the Egyptian government presents
itself as our moderate
Arab friend � in exchange for billions of
dollars in American aid.
FROM:
http://www.theabsurdreport.com/2006/the-unvarnished
-truth-from-the-mid-east/
THE UNVARNISHED TRUTH ABOUT CENSORSHIP
Thursday, February 14, 2008
"Facts are stubborn things; and
whatever may be our wishes, our
inclinations,
or the dictates of our
passion, they cannot alter the state of
facts and evidence."
- John Adams,
Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the
Boston Massacre
Trials, December 1770
There are a broad number of unfortunate
facts in the world. There are a wide
range
of unpleasant things which we would prefer
to just not think about. But
as a society,
we are always better served to deal with the
truth instead of
hiding
our heads in the sand. As a
civilization, it is our duty to
prepare our children
for the world by
arming them with facts, even as we
provide
values and beliefs
within which to
understand those facts.
We all do our best to shield our children
from the unpleasant and the unhappy,
but our
kids are exposed to it anyhow. On a trip to
Richmond, or Washington
New York, they are
exposed to
homelessness, even if they live in a
wealthy
subdvision. In their
own neighborhoods they are exposed to
violence, even if
parents have done all they
can to avoid it. Our kids are part of this
world, no
matter how we try to shelter them
from it. In the long-run,
too much shelter
can harm them rather
than helping them, as the reality of the
world is a reality
they will grow-up in,
live in, work in, and ultimately raise their
own families in.
That is why we must
strive to explain rather than
hide reality when our families
are faced
with it. And that is also why the censorship
of a book in our elementary
schools is a
grave disservice to our children.
A children's book about penguins was
pulled recently from general cir
culation
at Loudoun County elementary Schools.
The award-winning book, "And Tango Makes
Three" tells the true story of
two male
Chinstrap Penguins in New York's Central
Park Zoo who raised
an egg together. -
The Loudoun Times-Mirror
There are many things wrong with this
incident in censorship. Let us examine
first
how the decision to ban the book was made.
A parent at Sugarland Elementary in
Sterling raised concerns about the
book
within the last few months, said Wayde
Byard, public information
officer for
Loudoun County Public Schools.
The parent filed a complaint with the
principal, who reviewed the book
and
deemed it to be appropriate for
children. The parent then appealed
that
decision, and a district-level committee
made up of a parent, a teacher
, a school
librarian and administrators reviewed
the book. They ruled it
was acceptable
for general circulation.
Superintendent Edgar Hatrick III had
final say, though, and decided to
override that decision. -
The Loudoun Times-Mirror
It is wrong for Superintendent Hatrick to
substitute his individual judgment
over that
of the dozens of citizens
involved in the decision to retain And
Tango
Makes Three over a single parent's
complaint. No matter how
experienced and
wise Mr. Hatrick is, no
matter that he has been a great leader for
Loudoun
County's Public Schools through his
long tenure, one person should not have
the
authority to censor a book already vetted,
considered and approved. The
community had
its input, the community reached its
decision. The people who
made the decision
to retain the book were as representative,
if not more
representative, of the norms and
values of Loudoun County as Mr. Hatrick
himself.
And if sufficient parents are still angry
over the decision, the right place to
voice
that frustration is
before the School Board. The right place
to effect
change of policy is at the ballot
box.
Next, there is the question of the double
standard.
David Weintraub, president of Equality
Loudoun, a local gay and lesbian
rights
group, said the parent who made the
complaint about the book
has not been
prevented from expressing his or her
beliefs about family.
Therefore, he
said, why should this person prevent a
book from being
accessible to others who
might have a different idea about
family?
Loudoun County Public
Schools serve children from
all kinds of
families,
including families with two
moms or two dads," he said
in
a written statement. "The
Administration and School
Board need to
remember that
when confronted with this
sort of book challenge.
Dr.
Hatrick needs to explain why
he thought this book was
inappropriate for
circulation." -
The Loudoun Times-Mirror
The censorship of this book
represents a chilling double
standard.
It
says that the rights of
certain kinds of parents trump
the rights of other
kinds of
parents. It says that children
from certain kinds of families
will
be denied the right to
browse their school library and
enjoy the delight
of a book that
seems to speak to them, simply
because children from
other
kinds of families might also
find the same book.
Intentionally nor
not,
Superintendent Hatrick's
decision places an explicit
value judgment
on different
family lives in a school system
dedicated to
education of all,
equally.
It says, in effect, that some
are more equal than others.
And finally there is the issue
of truth. The book in question
was not fiction,
it was not a
hypothetical example designed to
make a point, it was the true
story of animals who teamed
up to raise a baby at a zoo. The
story contains
facts told in an
entertaining, narrative form.
The book stands as an amazing,
factual resource for
educating small children about
the world, using real
ideas and
themes (family, zoos, animals)
elementary students can easily
understand, but which can be
placed in a larger context by
parents.
We cannot shield our children
from the truth forever, that way
lies
disappointment and sadness.
We must equip them to deal with
it. Books
like this are an
amazing tool to help parents,
and teachers, do so.
I leave you with a comment from
the discussion of this issue on
the post
from
Living In LoCo.
I'll share this with you: i
was watching the today show
while getting
ready for work
a few years ago, and my 5 yr
old son walks in just as
they showed 2 men kissing
b/c they had just been
married in Mass. my
son
asked "mommy- why are 2 boys
kissing on the LIPS?!?!?" i
said,
some boys were born
liking to kiss boys, and
some boys are born liking
to
kiss girls. Now how about
some coco puffs for
breakfast?"
The world is out there. Our kids
are in it. And no book or lack
thereof will
shield our children
from it.
Published on Tuesday, July
25, 2006 by the
Toronto Star (Canada)
|
Media Self-Censorship Hides
Truth
|
by Antonia Zerbisias
|
|
They were gruesome lunchtime
images, and totally unexpected.
Yesterday, on CNN's Your World
Today, correspondent Becky
Anderson
in Beirut introduced a report by
Karl Penhaul who told
of a Tyre
family devastated by an Israeli air
strike.
"Let me tell you, some of these
pictures are disturbing," Anderson
warned. "Please be aware."
Then came the sights and sounds
of screaming children, their faces
and bodies barbecued by what the
doctor maintains are chemical
weapons which, stunningly, are
legal.
Finally, some reality in reality
programming.
Oh sure, CNN attempted to balance
out this story by preceding it
with
a lengthy report by the fatuous
Miles O'Brien. He led us up and
down
the streets of Haifa playing war
correspondent in a melodrama
mostly
of his own making, unwittingly
mocking the suffering of the
people
there.
"Those Katyusha rockets just keep
raining down," he said. "We're
told
upwards of 100 came down today. Once
again, as we say, Haifa
spared the
worst of it today, unlike yesterday,
with all those rockets
that came in
and a couple of deaths. In this
case, no damage or injury
to report.
And a lot of people here, I'm sure,
breathing a sigh of relief.
Having
said all that, there aren't as many
people here as there should
be."
All of which is why, no matter
how many bombs it rains down on
Lebanon, no matter how many villages
taken, no matter how battles
won,
Israel will lose the war of world
opinion.
That despite how Hezbollah
launches its rockets from downtown
Lebanon, ostensibly using civilians
as shields. The point is, Israel
still fires back, killing those
civilians. And it does it with
superio
r might and firepower, with
the backing of the world's greatest
superpower and, sadly, Canada.
It doesn't play well on TV, no
matter how much the news nets try
to
balance it.
What's different in this war,
unlike that in Iraq or Afghanistan,
is that
the journalists in both
countries are free to roam and
report,
unencumbered by embedding
and unconfined to army briefings
miles from the theatre of
operations.
Oh sure, the Israelis have a
censorship apparatus in place, and
Hezbollah has its media minders, but
the pictures tell their own
stories.
Too bad the mainstream media are not
publishing them.
For example, all last week, the
ghastly photos of torched children
who were part of a civilian convoy
trying to escape southern
Lebanon
were making the rounds on the
Internet.
None were used, as far as I can
tell, by any North American news
organization, including this one.
At the same time, other photos
were circulating on the Web. These
depicted young Israeli girls
scrawling messages on missiles bound
for Lebanon. The messages spoke of
love, but in the ironical sense.
Except for the Philadelphia
Inquirer � which was singled out
for a
scolding by the pro-Israel
media watchdog CAMERA � I am not
aware of any other paper that used
the AP photos.
(Just for the record: Yesterday
the Jerusalem Post confirmed
their
authenticity: "Although an
officer was present during the
incident,
the soldiers, and the IDF
as a whole, did not condone or
condemn
the incident.)
So, for all the freedom of
journalism in this conflict, there's
a lot of
self-censorship.
We see, as associate professor
Richard Fung of the Ontario College
of Art emailed me, "mostly
atmospheric shots of Israeli
soldiers and
military hardware; they
could be ads for arms manufacturers
they are
so beautiful, generic, and
`neutral.'"
We see bombed-out bridges and
buildings, as if no drivers or
inhabitants were killed.
But the truth will come out, with
the help of the Internet, mobile
phones and all the tech advantages
that are widely available on both
sides.
Meanwhile, most news
organizations are trying to be as
even-
handed as possible, as if not
to offend any of their
constituencies.
Trouble is, while they're minding
their pictures, they're slipping up
on their language.
Example: On CBC-TV's Sunday
Report, Israel had "moved into"
Lebanon as if it had taken
possession of a new condo instead of
a
chunk of the country.
Soldiers are "kidnapped" and not
"captured."And so it goes.
The war is such a media minefield
that even bloggers � and I'm
talking
the bigtime US guys � are reluctant
to tiptoe through it.
They're afraid of the hate mail.
"I, for one, sure as heck have no
desire to get sucked into that
no-win
situation," wrote Markos
Moulitsas, the guy behind Daily Kos,
the
biggest progressive blog in the
US.
The almost-as-popular Kevin Drum
(the Washington Monthly)
wrote:
"As near as I can tell, most
conservatives simply take the
uncomplicated stance that
Palestinians are terrorists and that
Israel
should always respond to
provocation in the maximal possible
way.
The fact that this hasn't
worked very well in the past doesn't
deter
them. Liberals don't really
have a similarly undemanding
position
that's suitable for the
quick-hit nature of blogging."
Cop-outs, both of them.
This is a time for truth telling,
no matter how gruesome it is.
Antonia Zerbisias has more
articles at
http://www.thestar.blogs.com.
FROM:
http://www.commondr eams.org/views06/0725-31.htm
.
EDITORS NOTE: This has
become such a big
controversy
starting a
couple of days after I
posted this dream on line,
it couldn't have been a
larger coincidence if there
is such
a thing. We
experience so many of these
coincidences
every day, we
call them little coincidinks. We say
the same
word or type he
same word as someone on TV
says the
same word, or just
before they do, that it is
like we are
reading their
minds.
AS OF 12-88-10 -
IT HAS BEEN DISCOVERED THAT THE
WHOLE
WIKILEAKS
FIASCO WAS SET UP BY THE CIA LIKE A
FALSE FLAG EVENT IN ORDER THAT THE
GOVERNMENT
COULD USE IT TO ELIMINATE FREEDOM OF
SPEECH
AND CURTAIL INTERNET RADIO SHOWS
LIKE ALEX
JONES AND STEVE QUAYLE ET AL, AND
ALTERNATIVE
NEW BLOGS WHERE REAL NEWS IS
REVEALED HAS
COME TO LIGHT.
Needless to say, we have
been so upset by media
control
and government
control over information, we
are proud
that Wikileaks
came out and started telling
the truth. We
need
mmore people like them, not
less We need more
Freedome of the Press - not
less. It's about time
the
secrets come out into
the open.
We want to see the truth
about UFOS, ALIEN
ABDUCTIONS,
SATANISM RITUALS
AND REPTILIANS BEHIND
GOVERMENT
OFFICIALS ALL THE
WAY FROM THE LITTLE GUY IN
CITY
GOVERNMENT, ALL THE WAY
TO THE TOP. AND IF
GOVERNMENT AND RELIGIOUS
LEADERS WANT TO PLAY
HANKIE
PANKIE BEHIND OUR BACKS TO
MAKE BROWNIE
POINTS WITH
OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
TO GET
TO THE TOP, LET THEM
BE KNOWN ABOUT OR LET THEM
STEP DOWN QUIETLY AND GO
AWAY SO WE HAVE
UPSTANDING
CITIZENS IN GOVERNMENT!!!
IF WE DON'T HAVE HONEST
ELECTIONS, WHICH WE DON'T
, ,
LET IT BE KNOWN THAT THE
BILDERBERGERS AND THE
BOHEMIAN GROVE CROWD RUN
THIS COUNTRY AND
OTHER
COUNTRIES, AND THE CFR
CONTROLS THIS
COUNTRY WITH
THEIR SEX GAMES AND WHATEVER
ELSE
THEY DO IN THEIR OCCULT
RITUALS, THEN LET IT BE
KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC.!!!
WIKILEAKS IS A WORLD
PATRIOT!! !WE
APPLAUD THEM!!!
INTRODUCTIONS TO
WIKILEAKS
WikiLeaks Controversies
lISTEN TO THE SHOW AT
http://www.coasttocoastam.com
Appearing during the first two
hours, radio host
Alex Jones offered
commentary on the WikiLeaks
situation and controversies
surrounding Julian Assange's arrest. WikiLeaks founder Assange
is being
set up and framed with rape
charges, he reported. Further,
Jones suggested that Cass Sunstein, the White House regulatory
czar, is actually behind WikiLeaks and is using it to create a kind of
"digital 9-11," or Internet kill switch. "They've got new legislation in
place they're calling the Patriot Act for the Internet-- taxation,
regulation, web IDs, a total iron curtain over the alternative press,"
he declared.
Regarding the Army Private (Bradley
Manning), suspected of
releasing the documents to WikiLeaks, Jones argued that a
low level Private would not have access to super-secret US
documents and cables that aren't
even connected to the US Army.
"It's clear that Manning is a patsy from the military angle," and
Assange is the patsy as the supposed
mastermind, he said. "My
point is that this is all being put
on display to sell a new
McCarthyism in this country, to
persecute anybody," and eliminate
whistleblowers, Jones warned.
"Could become as important a
journalistic tool as the
Freedom of
Information Act."
- Time Magazine
1.1 About WikiLeaks
WikiLeaks is a
not-for-profit media
organisation. Our goal is to
bring
important news and
information to the public.
We provide an
innovative,
secure and anonymous way for
sources to leak
information
to our journalists (our
electronic drop box). One of
our
most important
activities is to publish
original source material
alongside our news stories
so readers and historians
alike can see
evidence of
the truth. We are a young
organisation that has grown
very quickly, relying on a
network of dedicated
volunteers around the
globe.
Since 2007, when the
organisation was officially
launched,
WikiLeaks has
worked to report on and
publish important
information.
We also develop
and adapt technologies to
support these activities.
WikiLeaks has sustained
and triumphed against legal
and political
attacks
designed to silence our
publishing organisation, our
journalists and our
anonymous sources. The
broader principles
on which
our work is based are the
defence of freedom of speech
and media publishing, the
improvement of our common
historical
record and the
support of the rights of all
people to create new
history. We derive these
principles from the
Universal Declaration
of
Human Rights. In particular,
Article 19 inspires the work
of our
journalists and other
volunteers. It states that
everyone has the
right to
freedom of opinion and
expression; this right
includes f
reedom to hold
opinions without
interference and to seek,
receive
and impart
information and ideas
through any media and
regardless of frontiers. We
agree, and we seek to uphold
this and
the other Articles
of the Declaration.
1.2 How WikiLeaks works
WikiLeaks has combined
high-end security
technologies with
journalism
and ethical principles. Like
other media outlets
conducting investigative
journalism, we accept (but
do not solicit)
anonymous
sources of information.
Unlike other outlets, we
provide a high security
anonymous drop box fortified
by cutting-
edge
cryptographic information
technologies. This provides
maximum protection to our
sources. We are fearless in
our efforts
to get the
unvarnished truth out to the
public. When information
comes in, our journalists
analyse the material, verify
it and write a
news piece
about it describing its
significance to society. We
then
publish both the news
story and the original
material in order to
enable
readers to analyse the story
in the context of the
original
source material
themselves. Our news stories
are in the comfortable
presentation style of
Wikipedia, although the two
organisations are
not
otherwise related. Unlike
Wikipedia, random readers
can not edit
our source
documents.
As the media organisation
has grown and developed,
WikiLeaks
been developing
and improving a harm
minimisation procedure.
We
do not censor our news, but
from time to time we may
remove
or significantly
delay the publication of
some identifying details
from original documents to
protect life and limb of
innocent people.
We accept leaked material
in person and via postal
drops as
alternative
methods, although we
recommend the anonymous
electronic drop box as the
preferred method of
submitting any
material. We
do not ask for material, but
we make sure that if
material is going to be
submitted it is done
securely and that the
source
is well protected. Because
we receive so much
information,
and we have
limited resources, it may
take time to review a
source's
submission.
We also have a network of
talented lawyers around the
globe who
are personally
committed to the principles
that WikiLeaks is based
on,
and who defend our media
organisation.
1.3 Why the media (and
particularly Wiki leaks) is
important
Publishing improves
transparency, and this
transparency creates a
better society for all
people. Better scrutiny
leads to reduced
corruption
and stronger democracies in
all society's institutions,
including government,
corporations and other
organisations. A
healthy,
vibrant and inquisitive
journalistic media plays a
vital role
in achieving
these goals. We are part of
that media.
Scrutiny requires
information. Historically,
information has been
costly
in terms of human life,
human rights and economics.
As a
result of technical
advances particularly the
internet and
cryptography -
the risks of conveying
important information can
be
lowered. In its landmark
ruling on the Pentagon
Papers, the US
Supreme Court
ruled that "only a free and
unrestrained press
can
effectively expose deception
in government." We agree.
We believe that it is not
only the people of one
country that keep
their own
government honest, but also
the people of other
countries
who are watching
that government through the
media.
In the years leading up
to the founding of
WikiLeaks, we observed
the
world's publishing media
becoming less independent
and far
less willing to ask
the hard questions of
government, corporations
and
other institutions. We
believed this needed to
change.
WikiLeaks has provided a
new model of journalism.
Because we are
not motivated
by making a profit, we work
cooperatively with other
publishing and media
organisations around the
globe, instead of
following
the traditional model of
competing with other media.
We
don't hoard our
information; we make the
original documents
available
with our news stories.
Readers can verify the truth
of what
we have reported
themselves. Like a wire
service, WikiLeaks reports
stories that are often
picked up by other media
outlets. We encourage
this.
We believe the world's media
should work together as much
as
possible to bring stories
to a broad international
readership.
1.4 How WikiLeaks
verifies its news stories
We assess all news
stories and test their
veracity. We send a
submitted document through a
very detailed examination a
procedure
. Is it real? What
elements prove it is real?
Who would have the
motive to
fake such a document and
why? We use traditional
investigative journalism
techniques as well as more
modern
rtechnology-based
methods. Typically we will
do a forensic analysis
of
the document, determine the
cost of forgery, means,
motive,
opportunity, the
claims of the apparent
authoring organisation,
and
answer a set of other
detailed questions about the
document.
We may also seek
external verification of the
document For example,
for
our release of the
Collateral Murder video, we
sent a team of
journalists
to Iraq to interview the
victims and observers of the
helicopter attack. The team
obtained copies of hospital
records,
death certificates,
eye witness statements and
other corroborating
evidence
supporting the truth of the
story. Our verification
process
does not mean we
will never make a mistake,
but so far our method
has
meant that WikiLeaks has
correctly identified the
veracity of
every document
it has published.
Publishing the original
source material behind each
of our stories
is the way in
which we show the public
that our story is authentic.
Readers don't have to take
our word for it; they can
see for
themselves. In this
way, we also support the
work of other
journalism
organisations, for they can
view and use the original
documents freely as well.
Other journalists may well
see an angle
or detail in
the document that we were
not aware of in the first
instance. By making the
documents freely available,
we hope to
expand analysis
and comment by all the
media. Most of all, we
want
readers know the truth so
they can make up their own
minds.
1.5 The people behind
WikiLeaks
WikiLeaks is a project of
the Sunshine Press. It's
probably pretty
clear by now
that WikiLeaks is not a
front for any intelligence
agency or government despite
a rumour to that effect.
This rumour
was started
early in WikiLeaks'
existence, possibly by the
intelligence agencies
themselves. WikiLeaks is an
independent
global group of
people with a long standing
dedication to the
idea of a
free press and the improved
transparency in society that
comes from this. The group
includes accredited
journalists,
software
programmers, network
engineers, mathematicians
and
others.
To determine the truth of
our statements on this,
simply look at
the evidence.
By definition, intelligence
agencies want to hoard
information. By contrast,
WikiLeaks has shown that it
wants to do
just the
opposite. Our track record
shows we go to great lengths
to bring the truth to the
world without fear or
favour.
The great American
president Thomas Jefferson
once observed
that the price
of freedom is eternal
vigilance. We believe the
journalistic media plays a
key role in this vigilance.
1.6 Anonymity for
sources
As far as we can
ascertain, WikiLeaks has
never revealed any of its
sources. We can not provide
details about the security
of our media
organisation or
its anonymous drop box for
sources because to do
so
would help those who would
like to compromise the
security of
our organisation
and its sources. What we can
say is that we operate
a
number of servers across
multiple international
jurisdictions and
we we do
not keep logs. Hence these
logs can not be seized.
Anonymization occurs early
in the WikiLeaks network,
long before
information
passes to our web servers.
Without specialized global
internet traffic analysis,
multiple parts of our
organisation must
conspire
with each other to strip
submitters of their
anonymity.
However, we also provide
instructions on how to
submit material to
us, via
net cafes, wireless hot
spots and even the post so
that even
if WikiLeaks is
infiltrated by an external
agency, sources can still
not be traced. Because
sources who are of
substantial political or
intelligence interest may
have their computers bugged
or their
homes fitted with
hidden video cameras, we
suggest that if sources
are
going to send WikiLeaks
something very sensitive,
they do so
away from the
home and work.
A number of governments
block access to any address
with
WikiLeaks in the name.
There are ways around this.
WikiLeaks has
many cover
domains, such as
https://destiny.mooo.com,
that don't
have the
organisation in the name. It
is possible to write to us
or
ask around for other
cover domain addresses.
Please make sure
the
cryptographic certificate
says wikileaks.org .
2. WikiLeaks' journalism
record
2.1 Prizes and
background
WikiLeaks is the winner of:
- the 2008 Economist
Index on Censorship
Freedom of
Expression
award
- the 2009 Amnesty
International human
rights reporting
award
(New Media)
WikiLeaks has a history
breaking major stories in
major media
outlets and
robustly protecting sources
and press freedoms. We
have
never revealed a source. We
do not censor material.
Since
formation in 2007,
WikiLeaks has been
victorious over every legal
(and illegal) attack,
including those from the
Pentagon, the
Chinese Public
Security Bureau, the Former
president of Kenya,
the
Premier of Bermuda,
Scientology, the Catholic &
Mormon
Church, the largest
Swiss private bank, and
Russian companies.
WikiLeaks
has released more classified
intelligence documents
than
the rest of the world press
combined.
2.2 Some of the stories
we have broken
- War, killings,
torture and detention
- Government, trade
and corporate
transparency
- Suppression of free
speech and a free press
- Diplomacy, spying
and
(counter-)intelligence
- Ecology, climate,
nature and sciences
- Corruption, finance,
taxes, trading
- Censorship
technology and internet
filtering
- Cults and other
religious organizations
- Abuse, violence,
violation
War, killings, torture
and detention
- Changes in
Guantanamo Bay SOP
manual (2003-2004) -
Guantanamo Bay's main
operations manuals
- Of Orwell, Wikipedia
and Guantanamo Bay - In
where we track
down and
expose Guantanamo Bay's
propaganda team
- Fallujah jail
challenges US -
Classified U.S. report
into
appalling prison
conditions in Fallujah
- U.S lost Fallujah's
info war - Classified
U.S. intelligence report
on the battle of
Fallujah, Iraq
- US Military
Equipment in Iraq (2007)
- Entire unit by unit
equipment list of the
U.S army in Iraq
- Dili investigator
called to Canberra as
evidence of execution
mounts - the Feb 2008
killing of East Timor
rebel leader Reinado
- Como entrenar a
escuadrones de la muerte
y aplastar
revoluciones
de El Salvador a Iraq -
The U.S. Special Forces
manual on how to prop up
unpopular government
with
paramilitaries
Government, trade and
corporate transparency
- Change you can
download: a billion in
secret Congressional
reports - Publication of
more than 6500
Congressional
Research
Reports, worth more than
a billion dollars of US
tax-
funded research,
long sought after by
NGOs, academics and
researchers
- ACTA trade agreement
negotiation lacks
transparency - The
secret ACTA trade
agreement draft,
followed by dozens of
other publications,
presenting the initial
leak for the whole
ACTA
debate happening today
- Toll Collect
Vertraege, 2002 -
Publication of around
10.000
pages of a secret
contract between the
German federal
government and the Toll
Collect consortium, a
private operator
group
for heavy vehicle
tolling system
- Leaked documents
suggest European CAP
reform just a
whitewash
- European farm reform
exposed
- Stasi still in
charge of Stasi files -
Suppressed 2007
investigation into
infiltration of former
Stasi into the Stasi
files commission
- IGES Schlussbericht
Private
Krankenversicherung, 25
Jan 2010
- Hidden report
on the economics of the
German private health
insurance system and its
rentability
Suppression of free
speech and a free press
- The Independent:
Toxic Shame: Thousands
injured in African
city,
17 Sep 2009 -
Publication of an
article originally
published
in UK
newspaper The
Independent, but
censored from the
Independent's website.
WikiLeaks has saved
dozens of articles,
radio and tv recordings
from disappearing after
having been
censored
from BBC, Guardian, and
other major news
organisations archives.
- Secret gag on UK
Times preventing
publication of Minton
report
into toxic waste
dumping, 16 Sep 2009 -
Publication of
variations
of a
so-called
super-injunction, one of
many gag-orders
published
by WikiLeaks
to expose successful
attempts to suppress the
free
press via
repressive legal attacks
- Media suppression
order over Turks and
Caicos Islands
Commission of Inquiry
corruption report, 20
Jul 2009 - Exposure
of a
press gagging order from
the Turks and Caicos
Islands,
related to
WikiLeaks exposure of
the Commission of
Inquiry
corruption
report
- Bermuda's Premier
Brown and the BCC
bankdraft - Brown went
to the Privy council
London to censor the
press in Bermuda
- How German
intelligence infiltrated
Focus magazine - Illegal
spying on German
journalists
Diplomacy, spying and
(counter-)intelligence
- U.S. Intelligence
planned to destroy
WikiLeaks, 18 Mar 2008 -
Classified
(SECRET/NOFORN) 32 page
U.S. counterintelligence
investigation into
WikiLeaks. Has been in
the worldwide news.
- CIA report into
shoring up Afghan war
support in Western
Europe, 11 Mar 2010 -
This classified CIA
analysis from March,
outlines possible
PR-strategies to shore
up public support in
Germany and France for a
continued war in
Afghanistan.
Received
international news
coverage in print, radio
and TV.
- U.S. Embassy
profiles on Icelandic
PM, Foreign Minister,
Ambassador - Publication
of personal profiles for
briefing
documents for
U.S. officials visiting
Iceland. While lowly
classified are
interesting for subtle
tone and internal facts.
- Cross-border clashes
from Iraq O.K. -
Classified documents
reveal destabalizing
U.S. military rules
- Tehran Warns US
Forces against Chasing
Suspects into Iran -
Iran warns the United
States over classified
document on
WikiLeaks
- Inside Somalia and
the Union of Islamic
Courts - Vital
strategy
documents in the Somali
war and a play for
Chinese support
Ecology, climate, nature
and sciences
- Draft Copenhagen
climate change
agreement, 8 Dec 2009 -
Confidential draft
"circle of commitment"
(rich-country)
Copenhagen climate
change agreement
- Draft Copenhagen
Accord Dec 18, 2009 -
Three page draft
Copehagen "accord", from
around Friday 7pm, Dec
18, 2009;
includes
pen-markings
- Climatic Research
Unit emails, data,
models, 1996-2009 - Over
60MB of emails,
documents, code and
models from the Climatic
Research Unit at the
University of East
Anglia, written between
1996 and 2009 that lead
to a worldwide debate
- The Monju nuclear
reactor leak - Three
suppressed videos from
Japan's fast breeder
reactor Monju revealing
the true extent of
the
1995 sodium coolant
disaster
Corruption, finance,
taxes, trading
- The looting of Kenya
under President Moi -
$3,000,000,000
presidential corruption
exposed; swung the Dec
2007 Kenyan
election,
long document, be
patient
- Gusmao's $15m rice
deal alarms UN - Rice
deal corruption in
East
Timor
- How election
violence was financed -
the embargoed Kenyan
Human Rights Commission
report into the Jan 2008
killings
of over 1,300
Kenyans
- Financial collapse:
Confidential exposure
analysis of 205
companies each owing
above EUR45M to
Icelandic bank
Kaupthing, 26 Sep 2008 -
Publication of a
confidential report
that
has lead to hundreds of
newspaper articles
worldwide
- Barclays Bank gags
Guardian over leaked
memos detailing
offshore
tax scam, 16 Mar 2009 -
Publication of censored
documents revealing a
number of elaborate
international tax
avoidance schemes by the
SCM (Structured Capital
Markets)
division of
Barclays
- Bank Julius Baer:
Grand Larceny via Grand
Cayman - How
the largest
private Swiss bank
avoids paying tax to the
Swiss
government
- Der Fall Moonstone
Trust - Cayman Islands
Swiss bank trust
exposed
- Over 40 billion euro
in 28167 claims made
against the
Kaupthing
Bank, 23 Jan 2010 - List
of Kaupthing claimants
after Icelandic banking
crash
- Northern Rock vs.
WikiLeaks - Northern
Rock Bank UK failed
legal injunctions over
the ¡Ì24,000,000,000
collapse
- Whistleblower
exposes insider trading
program at JP Morgan -
Legal insider trading in
three easy steps,
brought to you by
JP
Morgan and the SEC
Censorship technology
and internet filtering
- Eutelsat suppresses
independent
Chinese-language TV
station
NTDTV to satisfy
Beijing - French sat
provider Eutelsat
covertly
removed an
anti-communist TV
channel to satisfy
Beijing
- Internet Censorship
in Thailand - The secret
internet censorship
lists of Thailand's
military junta
Cults and other
religious organizations
- Church of
Scientology's 'Operating
Thetan' documents leaked
online - Scientology's
secret, and highly
litigated bibles
- Censored Legion de
Cristo and Regnum Cristi
document
collection -
Censored internal
documents from the
Catholic
sect Legion de
Cristo (Legion of
Christ)
- US Department of
Labor investigation into
Landmark
Education, 2006
- 2006 investigative
report by the U.S.
Department of Labor on
Landmark Education
Abuse, violence,
violation
- Report on Shriners
raises question of
wrongdoing -
corruption
exposed at 22 U.S. and
Canadian children's
hospitals.
- Claims of
molestation resurface
for US judo official
- Texas Catholic
hospitals did not follow
Catholic ethics,
report
claims - Catholic
hospitals violated
catholic ethics
3. Short essays on how a
more inquiring media can
make a
difference in the
world
3.1 The Malaria Case
Study: the antidote is good
governance
born from a
strong media
Malaria is a case study
in why good governance not
just good
science is the
solution to so much human
suffering. This year,
the
mosquito borne disease will
kill over one million
people.
More than 80% of
these will be children.
Great Britain used
to have
malaria. In North America,
malaria was epidemic and
there are still a handful of
infections each year. In
Africa malaria
kills over
100 people per hour. In
Russia, amidst the
corruption
of the 1990s,
malaria re-established
itself. What is the
difference
between these
cases?
Why does Malaria kill so
many people in one place but
barely
take hold in another?
Why has malaria been allowed
to gain a
foothold in places
like Russia where it was
previously
eradicated? We
know how to prevent malaria
epidemics. The
science is
universal. The difference is
good governance.
Put another way,
unresponsive or corrupt
government, through
malaria
alone, causes a children's
"9/11" every day. [1]
It is only when the
people know the true plans
and behaviour
of their
governments that they can
meaningfully choose to
support or reject them.
Historically, the most
resilient forms of
open
government are those where
publication and revelation
are protected. Where that
protection does not exist,
it is our
mission to provide
it through an energetic and
watchful media.
In Kenya, malaria was
estimated to cause 20% of
all deaths in
children under
five. Before the Dec 2007
national elections,
WikiLeaks exposed $3 billion
of Kenyan corruption, which
swung the vote by 10%. This
led to changes in the
constitution
and the
establishment of a more open
government. It is too
soon
to know if it will
contribute to a change in
the human cost
of malaria in
Kenya but in the long term
we believe it may. It is
one
of many reforms catalyzed by
WikiLeaks unvarnished
reporting.3.2 The importance
of principled leaking to
journalism,
good government
and a healthy society
Principled leaking has
changed the course of
history for the
better. It
can alter the course of
history in the present, and
it
can lead us to a better
future.
Consider Daniel Ellsberg,
working within the US
government
during the
Vietnam War. He comes into
contact with the
Pentagon
Papers, a meticulously kept
record of military and
strategic planning
throughout the war. Those
papers reveal
the depths to
which the US government has
sunk in deceiving
the
American people about the
war. Yet the public and the
media know nothing of this
urgent and shocking
information.
Indeed, secrecy
laws are being used to keep
the public ignorant
of gross
dishonesty practised by
their own government. In
spite of those secrecy laws
and at great personal risk,
Ellsberg
manages to
disseminate the Pentagon
papers to journalists and
to
the world. Despite criminal
charges against Ellsberg,
eventually dropped, the
release of the Pentagon
Papers shocks
the world,
exposes the government lying
and helps to shorten
the war
and save thousands of both
American and Vietnamese
lives.
The power of principled
leaking to call governments,
corporations
and
institutions to account is
amply demonstrated through
recent
history. The public
scrutiny of otherwise
unaccountable and
secretive
institutions forces them to
consider the ethical
implications of their
actions. Which official will
chance a secret,
corrupt
transaction when the public
is likely to find out? What
repressive plan will be
carried out when it is
revealed to the
citizenry,
not just of its own country,
but the world? When the
risks of embarrassment and
discovery increase, the
tables are
turned against
conspiracy, corruption,
exploitation and
oppression.
Open government answers
injustice rather than
causing it. Open government
exposes and undoes
corruption.
Open governance
is the most effective method
of promoting
good
governance.
Today, with authoritarian
governments in power in much
of the
world, increasing
authoritarian tendencies in
democratic
governments, and
increasing amounts of power
vested in
unaccountable
corporations, the need for
openness and
transparency is
greater than ever. WikiLeaks
interest is the
revelation
of the truth. Unlike the
covert activities of state
intelligence agencies, as a
media publisher WikiLeaks
relies
upon the power of
overt fact to enable and
empower citizens
to bring
feared and corrupt
governments and corporations
to
justice.
With its anonymous drop
box, WikiLeaks provides an
avenue
for every government
official, every bureaucrat,
and every
corporate worker,
who becomes privy to damning
information
that their
institution wants to hide
but the public needs to
know.
What conscience cannot
contain, and institutional
secrecy
unjustly conceals,
WikiLeaks can broadcast to
the world. It is
telling
that a number of government
agencies in different
countries
(and indeed some
entire countries) have tried
to ban access to
WikiLeaks.
This is of course a silly
response, akin to the
ostrich
burying its head in
the sand. A far better
response would be to
behave
in more ethical ways.
Authoritarian
governments, oppressive
institutions and corrupt
corporations should be
subject to the pressure, not
merely of
international
diplomacy, freedom of
information laws or even
periodic elections, but of
something far stronger - the
consciences
of the people
within them.
3.3 Should the press
really be free?
In its landmark ruling on
the Pentagon Papers, the US
Supreme
Court ruled that
"only a free and
unrestrained press can
effectively
expose deception
in government." We agree.
The ruling stated that
"paramount among the
responsibilities of a
free
press is the duty to prevent
any part of the government
from
deceiving the people
and sending them off to
distant lands to die
of
foreign fevers and foreign
shot and shell."
It is easy to perceive
the connection between
publication and the
complaints people make about
publication. But this
generates a
perception bias,
because it overlooks the
vastness of the invisible.
It overlooks the unintended
consequences of failing to
publish and
it overlooks all
those who are emancipated by
a climate of free
speech.
Such a climate is a
motivating force for
governments and
corporations
to act justly. If acting in
a just manner is easier than
acting in an unjust manner,
most actions will be just.
Sufficient principled
leaking in tandem with
fearless reporting will
bring down administrations
that rely on concealing
reality from their
own
citizens.
It is increasingly
obvious that corporate fraud
must be effectively
addressed. In the US,
employees account for most
revelations of
fraud,
followed by industry
regulators, media, auditors
and, finally,
the SEC.
Whistleblowers account for
around half of all exposures
of fraud.
Corporate corruption
comes in many forms. The
number of
employees and
turnover of some
corporations exceeds the
population and GDP of some
nation states. When
comparing
countries, after
observations of population
size and GDP, it is
usual to
compare the system of
government, the major power
groupings and the civic
freedoms available to their
populations.
Such
comparisons can also be
illuminating in the case of
corporations.
Considering the largest
corporations as analogous to
a nation state
reveals the
following properties:
- The right to vote
does not exist except
for share holders
(analogous to land
owners) and even there
voting power is in
proportion to ownership.
- All power issues
from a central
committee.
- There is no
balancing division of
power. There is no
fourth
estate. There are
no juries and innocence
is not presumed.
- Failure to submit to
any order may result in
instant exile.
- There is no freedom
of speech.
- There is no right of
association. Even
romance between men
and
women is often forbidden
without approval.
- The economy is
centrally planned.
- There is pervasive
surveillance of movement
and electronic
communication.
- The society is
heavily regulated, to
the degree many
employees
are told when,
where and how many times
a day they can go to t
he
toilet.
- There is little
transparency and
something like the
Freedom of
Information
Act is unimaginable.
- Internal opposition
groups, such as unions,
are blackbanned,
surveilled and/or
marginalized whenever
and wherever possible.
While having a GDP and
population comparable to
Belgium,
Denmark or New
Zealand, many of these
multi-national corporations
have nothing like their
quality of civic freedoms
and protections.
This is
even more striking when the
regional civic laws the
company
operates under are
weak (such as in West Papua,
many African states
or even
South Korea); there, the
character of these corporate
tyrannies is unregulated by
their civilizing
surroundings.
Through governmental
corruption, political
influence, or manipulation
of the judicial system,
abusive corporations are
able to gain control
over
the defining element of
government the sole right to
deploy
coercive force.
Just like a country, a
corrupt or unethical
corporation is a menace to
all
inside and outside it.
Corporations will behave
more ethically if the
world
is watching closely.
WikiLeaks has exposed
unethical plans and
behaviour in corporations
and this as resulted in
recompense or other
forms of
justice forms of justice for
victims.
3.4 Could oppressive
regimes potentially come to
face legal
consequences as a
result of evidence posted on
WikiLeaks?
The laws and immunities
that are applied in national
and international
courts,
committees and other legal
institutions vary, and we
can't
comment on them in
particular. The probative
value of documents
posted on
WikiLeaks in a court of law
is a question for courts to
decide.
While a secure chain of
custody cannot be
established for anonymous
leaks, these leaks can lead
to successful court cases.
In many cases, it
is easier
for journalists or
investigators to confirm the
existence of a
known
document through official
channels (such as an FOI law
or legal
discovery) than it
is to find this information
when starting from nothing.
Having the title, author or
relevant page numbers of an
important
document can
accelerate an investigation,
even if the content itself
has
not been confirmed. In
this way, even unverified
information is an
enabling
jump-off point for media,
civil society or official
investigations.
Principled
leaking has been shown to
contribute to bringing
justice to
victims via the
court system.
|
FROM:
http://wikileaks.org/media/about.html
|
SCRUTINIZING, TILL THE
TRUTH IS KNOWN...
Please see our Fair Use Notice
December 7, 2010br />
Wikileaks or WikIsrael? WikiAngel or WikiWeasel? We Won't Let
Them
Pull The Wool Over Our Eyes!
Hello everysoul!
I just have so much material to share with you that I've decided to
split it into 3 compilations. This first one deals almost (aside from a
special focus below on the tense situation in the Korean peninsula)
solely with the Wikileaks phenomenon that has reached critical mass
in
the last week with a barrage of media coverage, which is now
ebbing away
as everything does in the short attention span of
nowadays shallow media
coverage of current events, always
chasing the next Big Thing as soon as
the last one stops being new
. In fact this whole WikiThing is sooo "last
week" already... Yet there
is much to be concerned and informed about.
You will find below a smorgasborg of viewpoints on it, most of them
being extremely skeptical of the whole charade, many in fact viewing
it
as another kind of 9/11, a view I support as you'll see in my first
long
comment on top of the first article below. If we recall correctly
not
only the original 9/11 false flag operation was used to launch 2
phony
and very bloody wars, but it was also the excuse to ram down
everyone's
throat the infamous Patriot Act which has set the stage
for today's full
spectrum destruction of a growing number of freedoms
and rights that, in
the US, are supposed to be enshrined in the
constitution... Think for
instance about the lunatic gropefest going
on in US airports and before
boarding US-bound flights from
anywhere around the world and you'll have
an idea of what it is
coming to... And BTW I have over 30 pages of Rape
Gate Update
material that I'll also email you separately in the next
couple days as
this is far from over... And I'll also email you a
"regular" fact-filled
compilation... all three adding up to over 103,000
words...
So where is the parallel with 9/11? As the US and other Western
governments come to realize that they cannot wack-a-mole
Wikileaks
out of existence - check
its galaxy of mirror sites -
I would not be
surprised that, as some are beginning to realize, they
will use this
situation as an excuse to take over the Internet and clamp
down
China-style on the freedom of speech that is exponentially hacking
at the branches of their legitimacy, exposing their lies and
lobbies-
driven corruption, and empowering countless good people to not
only question the official lines spewed by the propaganda
shamstream
media, but organize
through all kinds of ways to
change the world from the bottom up.
We may have to go around the "roadblocks" and access-denial
clogged Web
arteries that may result from such possible attempts
to stifle free
speech, but I trust that with enough ingenuity and
persistence, the
voice of the conscience of millions of awakening
souls will continue to
come through loud and clear – and peacefully
– to campaign and cocreate
the changes we can believe in... the
ones we came here to manifest.
Feel free to ERNleak this widely ;-)
Jean Hudon
Earth Rainbow Network Coordinator
http://www.earthrainbownetwork.com
Is WikiLeaks A CIA Operation? Part 1 -
Part 2
HERE -
Part 3
HERE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xw-tvJyPGvc
Webster Tarpley exposes Julian Assange and Wikipedia as a
CIA operation.
WikiLeaks is ZioPoison!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYIC2BMhE5A
LAST MINUTE DEVELOPMENT
Britain Arrests WikiLeaks Founder on Sex Charges
(December 7, 2010)
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/08/world/europe/08assange.html
LONDON — In the latest twist in the drama swirling around the
WikiLeaks
anti-secrecy group, British police officials said on
Tuesday they had
arrested Julian Assange, its beleaguered founder
, on a warrant issued in
Sweden in connection with alleged sex
offenses.Mr. Assange, a
39-year-old Australian, was arrested by
officers from Scotland Yard’s
extradition unit when he went to a
central London police station by
prior agreement with the authorities,
the police said. A court hearing
was expected later.In a statement,
the police said: “Officers from the
Metropolitan Police extradition unit
have this morning arrested Julian
Assange on behalf of the Swedish
authorities on suspicion of rape.”Mr.
Assange denies the charges of
sexual misconduct said to have been
committed while he was in
Sweden in August. It was not immediately clear
if Mr. Assange would
resist extradition to Sweden for questioning by
prosecutors there.
CLIP - AS IS MENTIONED FURTHER BELOW..
.
Assange Accuser Worked with US-Funded, CIA-Tied Anti-Castro
Group
"at least one of which is US-funded and openly supported by
a former CIA
agent convicted in the mass murder of seventy three
Cubans on an
airliner he was involved in blowing up." AS ilyes
(ilyes@earthlink.net)
JUST POINTED OUT TO ME ADDING "the
one who's allegedly CIA-PsyOps
involved is one of the women who
've levied the charge of 'rape' against
him ... in Sweden, 'rape'
includes sexual relations without a condom...
What if he genuinely
IS innocent of all the crazy Zionist/CIA propaganda
charges?" AS
THE TITLE OF THIS COMPILATION IMPLIES - WikiAngel or
WikiWeasel? - THE JURY IS STILL OUT... YOU DECIDE...
To ensure that these compilations are not blocked, please add
globalvisionary@earthrainbownetwork.com to your safe senders list.
If
you don't know how to do so, go at
http://www.truthout.org/whitelisting where you will find a very
comprehensive set of instructions. Your feedback is as always
welcomed
and may be included in a coming compilation - unless
you prefer it is
not. Circulating this compilation (or any part of it)
and personally
inviting your correspondents to subscribe to this
list would also help
enlarge the circle of people who have access
to this material. Please
include the following note and the URL
address for the archived copy
below along with your forwards, so
others may have the opportunity to
explore the original copy, if they
so choose.
THE QUOTES
"Although the election of Barack Obama gave rise to the "outrage"
expressed by the so-called "tea party" movement, if there is any
political group in America that has a right to be outraged, it is the
Progressives. They bought into Obama's message of change and
hope,
believed that the criminals of the Bush dictatorship would
have to
answer for their crimes, and naively dreamed that America'
s respect for
peace, justice and human rights would be restored. But,
as Wikileaks and
the antics of Obama's "Justice" Department have
shown, the Progressives
were deceived. Yet, as in the past, they are
forced to be supportive of
Obama's duplicity because the alternative
is worse. I want to believe
that the Wikileaks documents will change
America for the better. But
what undoubtedly will happen is a
repetition of the past: those who
expose government crimes and
cover-ups will be prosecuted or branded as
criminals; new laws
will be passed to silence dissent; new Liebermans
will arise to
intimidate the corporate-controlled media; and new ways
will be
found to conceal the truth. What Wikileaks has done is make
people understand why so many Americans are politically apathetic
and
content to lose themselves in one or more of the addictions
American
culture offers, be it drugs, alcohol, the Internet, video
games,
celebrity gossip, text-messaging-in essence anything that
serves to
divert attention from the harshness of reality."
- David R. Hoffman - Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru --
Taken from
Valerie Plame, YES! Wikileaks, NO!
below A MUST READ. Powerful, eye-opening articl0
"It is a well-known practice of intelligence agencies to give large
bits
of genuine material, none of it too compromising, in order to
get either
an important piece of intelligence in return or to “bury”
some damaging
deception like a fish hook planted in a minnow."
- Taken from
A rebuke to "Is
Wikileaks a front for the CIA or Mossad?" below
GORDON DUFF: THE WIKI HOAX (December 2, 2010)
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/12/02/gordon-duff-the-wiki-hoax/
True colors, we are seeing them now. Those still trying to peddle the
Wikileaks myth, the boyish grin concealing the powerful conspiracy,
espionage and treason at the highest levels of American society,
these
are the real enemies of the information age. There are two
opinions of
Wikileaks. The worlds intelligence services all, every
single one,
believes Wikileaks is simply an intelligence agency
playing games. They
say this to each other, Vladimir Putin and
Zbigniew Brzezinski have
announced it to the world and others are
following suit. Nobody, at
least nobody typically “answerable” will
say the word “Israel” but it is
what they mean when they say
“intelligence agency.” They mean Israel.
Every Wikileak does
something to help Israel in a different way at a
different time. If I
srael has a problem, a Wikileak is there, part of
the solution. This
time, Secretary Clinton was in the way and Wikileaks
showed up to
gut the State Department and give Israel the usual “buff
and polish”
job they usually do.There is another group, not a group that
actually
believes Wikileaks is real, few but the “Joe Six-Pack” crowd
buys
that, but a group that loves Wikileaks like an addict loves a fix.
The
press loves Wikileaks. I even love Wikileaks. Wikileaks is pushing
readership through the roof, not just America but worldwide.
Wikileaks
is a news marketing phenomenon like any disaster.
There is a reason the
media are compared to vultures and hyenas.
Killing Wikileaks as the hoax
it is, and not a harmless hoax, not by
a long shot, is like killing the
golden goose. Wikileaks sells news,
pulls up website traffic to
unimaginable levels, even crashes servers
from overload. There isn’t
just one story, teaching the world how
bad America is, there is also the
daytime TV drama, the soap opera
of Julian Assange.I wonder when the
public will pick up on the
endless stream of carefully posed, carefully
staged photos. Just
imagine meeting Assange, hiding from Interpol,
running for his life,
the CIA hunting him down, angry “date rape’
victims lurking the
streets of London and Amsterdam. He always has time
for the media,
never misses an interview.
(...) Calling Wikileaks a simple hoax is a kindness. Maybe we can call
9/11 a hoax also. Will the families of the dead feel any better? History
will prove Wikileaks, 9/11, the invasion of Iraq, the mindless and
seemingly eternal fiasco of Afghanistan are all acts in the same play,
certainly a tragedy but hardly Shakespearean. Bradley Manning isn’t
the
“Wikileaker,” not by a long shot. If the FBI’s assertions about
AIPAC
are correct and there is no reason to believe otherwise,
Wikileaks could
easily be the small army of “dual citizens,” the only
possible suspects.
There is no other group able to silence and shelve
the FBI, able to pull
documents out of databases at Defense, State,
foreign embassies. The sad
attempts to blame Manning or the
Chinese, certainly victims of the
recent revelations, are acts of
desperation.Wikileaks the hoax isn’t an
area for rumination. You
accept the fact or show your colors, red white
and blue or blue and
white.That time is here, the debates are long over.
Assange a hero?
Assange a victim? Where you see those questions, look
behind them.
You will see the smiling face of treason, not for the first
time.
Assange Accuser Worked with US-Funded, CIA-Tied Anti-Castro
Group
(December 4, 2010)
http://my.firedoglake.com/kirkmurphy/2010/12/04/assanges-chief-
accuser-has-her-own-history-with-us-funded-anti-castro-groups-
one-of-which-has-cia-ties/
Yesterday Alexander Cockburn reminded us of the news Israel Shamir
and
Paul Bennett broke at Counterpunch in September. Julian
Assange’s chief
accuser in Sweden has a significant history of work
with anti-Castro
groups, at least one of which is US funded and
openly supported by a
former CIA agent convicted in the mass
murder of seventy three Cubans on
an airliner he was involved in
blowing up. CLIP
Wikileaks: Brought to you by the CIA - These guys nailed it back
in July
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjW4s5EtG6s
Everything you wanted to know about Wikileaks but didn't know to
ask
Julian Assange. He's a guy with a vague history... Who travels
the world
without visible means of support... His parents: Members
He hates the
9/11 truth movement... He has no info about the Bush
or Obama White
House...or the Federal Reserve Bank... or Goldman
Sachs (but he is
helping take down Bank of America)... His "leaks"
paint Pakistan as a
threat and foreign politicians the CIA doesn't
ike as jerks... He
believes Osama is alive... and probably in Pakistan
Everything else
he "leaks" is stuff we all already knew... The
mainstream media loves
him... The right wingers love to hate him
and are using him as a
justification to censor the Net... If it looks
like a duck, sounds like
a duck and smells like a duck... Another
intelligence agency spectacle.
(Comment from
BrasscheckTV) If
you like how these 2 guys treat deliver their angle
on the
propaganda of the lamestream check their other releases through
feed://newworldnextweek.blip.tv/rss/itunes/
SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE HEIGHTENED RISK OF A
FULL-BLOWN
WAR IN KOREA
NOTE from Jean: With each passing day, the rising tensions
between
North and South Korea - which the US appears to be keen on
fostering,
perhaps as a smokescreen for its own crumbling economic
situation
but also as part of the Cabal gradual build up of a
casus belli to
engage
at some point into a wider war with China whose growing economic
and military clout, paired with a possible secret alliance with its own
group of ETs (according
to David Wilcock), may be jeopardizing the
Cabal's agenda. I know
this sounds far-fetched but, nevertheless, I feel
there is a growing
cause for concern there and that should some
inconsiderate and yet
deliberate action ignite the power keg that this
whole heavily
militarized peninsula is, it will be extremely difficult to
climb back
from an ensuing full, bloody confrontation that could have
far-reaching
consequences that none of the actors involved seems to
be willing to
seriously consider and factor into their current aggressive
posturing.
So if you feel like sending peaceful and healing vibes to the
millions
of souls who have been trapped into this long tragedy of a
people
separated by 2 opposing paradigms instilled into them by their
respective controllers from day one of their lives, by all means
shower
liberally all souls concerned with the Love-filled Light of
forgiveness,
compassion and reconciliation, for the highest good of
all... as One.
China urges dialogue on North Korea crisis (December 7, 2010)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11934402
China says dialogue and co-operation are the only way forward to help
deal with tensions on the Korean peninsula.The responsibility for
maintaining peace should be "shouldered by all parties in the region,"
foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said.China - North Korea's
main
ally - is under pressure from the US and others to rein in the
"provocative" North.It comes two weeks after North Korea's deadly
attack
on a South Korean island in answer to military drills by Seoul
.Two South
Korean marines and two civilians were killed when
Pyongyang shelled
Yeonpyeong island on 23 November.It was the
first attack on a
civilian-populated area in the South since the end
of the Korean war in
1953.The situation on the peninsula remains
highly unstable. South Korea
has entered a second day of major
live-fire exercises, despite warnings
from the North.
KNOW THE FACTS: North Korea lost close to 30% of its population
as a
result of US bombings in the 1950s by Michel Chossudovsky
(27 November
2010)
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22131
The World is at a dangerous crossroads. The US is seeking a
pretext to
wage war on North Korea. North Korea is said to
constitute a threat to
Global Security. From the Truman Doctrine to
Obama. The history of the
1950s Korean war confirms that extensive
war crimes were committed
against the Korean people. As
confirmed by the statement of General
Curtis Lemay: "Over a period
of three years or so we killed off - what -
twenty percent of the
population." North Korea lost close to thirty
percent of its
population as a result of US led bombings in the 1950s.
US military
sources confirm that 20 percent of North Korea's population
was
killed off over a three period of intensive bombings: "After
destroying North Korea's 78 cities and thousands of her villages,
and
killing countless numbers of her civilians, [General] LeMay
remarked,
"Over a period of three years or so we killed off - what -
twenty
percent of the population." It is now believed that the
population north
of the imposed 38th Parallel lost nearly a third
its population of 8 - 9
million people during the 37-month long
"hot" war, 1950 - 1953, perhaps
an unprecedented percentage of
mortality suffered by one nation due to
the belligerance of another.
" During The Second World War the United
Kingdom lost 0.94% of
its population, France lost 1.35%, China lost
1.89% and the US
lost 0.32%. During the Korean war, North Korea lost
close to 30 %
of its population. These figures of civilian deaths in
North Korea
should also be compared to those compiled for Iraq by the
Lancet
Study (John Hopkins School of Public Health). The Lancet study
e
stimated a total of 655,000 Iraqi civilian deaths, following the US
led
invasion (March 2003- June 2006). We call upon the people of
the US,
Canada and NATO countries to put pressure on their
governments. A war on
North Korea would engulf the entire region.
- CHECK ALSO
Escalation in the Korean Peninsula?
US and South Korea plan more war
games -
Dangers of Military Escalation: Russian,
Chinese foreign ministers
discuss Korean conflict -
US-South Korea military drills.
China opposes any military acts in
exclusive economic zone
without permission -
The Threat of War in Korea:
Philippines prepares for possible mass
evacuation from S.Korea,
requests Japan's aid -
New Korean war could ensnare Canada,
documents suggest -
US
Exploits Korean Clash to Step Up
Pressure on China -
VIDEO: South Korea Admits to Firing
Shells at North Korea -
Skirmish between North and South Korea:
South Korea Fired the First Shot
-
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22139
Korea War Pretext Incident: The Sinking of the Cheonan,
Reviewing the
Evidence
Ron Paul: Korea Conflict May Be Orchestrated Crisis To Boost
Dollar
(November 23, 2010)
RAND Corporation has been aggressively lobbying the Pentagon
to become
embroiled in a major new war to jump-start a recovery
of the US
economy and boost profits for the military-industrial
complex after the
scaling down of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Chinese media sources
reported that RAND had presented a
proposal to the Pentagon that
revolved around fostering a conflict
with a major foreign power in order
to stimulate the American
economy and prevent a double dip recession.
Although at the time
RAND considered North Korea on its own to be too
small a target,
any full scale confrontation between the Koreas would
embroil
the United States on the side of the South and China on the side
of the North. If North Korea were to tap its arsenal of nuclear
weapons,
the entire international community would quickly rubber
stamp a US-led
military assault on the rogue nation. Given the fact
that North Korea's
nuclear belligerency has its foundations in the
best efforts of people
like Donald Rumsfeld and the Bush
administration, through the AQ Khan
weapons trading network,
to provide Communist agitator Kim Jong-Il and
his hereditary
successor with nuclear weapons, the fact that we are now
seeing
tensions reach boiling point represents a huge opportunity for
the
US military-industrial complex to manipulate into being the
massive
war that they have been seeking for years. -
CHECK ALSO
The Korean Crisis: Cui Bono?
S. Korea starts naval firing drills amid tension (Dec 6, 2010)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2010-12-05-koreas-
conflict_N.htm
SEOUL (AP) - South Korean troops pushed ahead with naval
firing drills
Monday, a day after North Korea warned such
exercises would aggravate
already high tensions between the
rivals following the North's deadly
shelling last month of a front-
line South Korean island.South Korea's
army began firing artillery
into the waters off the divided Korean
peninsula as part of week-
long drills set to continue through Sunday,
South Korean army
and Joint Chiefs of Staff officers said.The officers,
who spoke on
condition of anonymity citing office rules, said the drills
were to
take place at nearly 30 sites, but none of Monday's exercises
were
near the disputed western sea border between the Koreas where
last
month's attack took place. The navy said warships were to join
the
drills later this week. South Korea's military and Defense
Ministry
declined to provide further details on the drills.Tensions
have soared
since Nov. 23, when North Korea rained shells on
Yeonpyeong Island,
killing four South Koreans, including two
civilians. The North said
South Korea first fired artillery toward its
territorial waters. South
Korea says it fired shells southward, not
toward North Korea, as part of
routine exercises. Deadly skirmishes
occur periodically along the
disputed maritime border, but the
latest assault on Yeonpyeong, home to
both fishing communities
and military bases, was the North's first to
target a civilian area
since the 1950-53 Korean War. The North also
stoked regional
tension last month by revealing a large
uranium-enrichment facility
that would give it a new method of making
material for atomic
bombs in addition to its known plutonium-based
program. Top
diplomats from the U.S., South Korea and Japan were to meet
in
Washington on Monday to discuss the North's nuclear program
and its
artillery barrage. On Sunday, North Korea lashed out at
South Korea for
causing "uncontrollable, extreme" tension on the
peninsula, pointing to
the planned firing drills and what it called
South Korea's "frantic
provocations." "The South Korean puppet
group, far from drawing a lesson
from the deserved punishment it
faced for its reckless firing of shells
into the territorial waters of the
(North Korea) side around Yeonpyeong
Island, is getting more
frantic in military provocations and war moves,"
the North's official
Korean Central News Agency said. A KCNA dispatch
warned that
a war between the Koreas would disturb regional peace and
security.
South Korean Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin said last week that
jets
would bomb the North if it stages another attack. Kim took office
Saturday, replacing a predecessor who resigned amid criticism that
South
Korea's response to the shelling was too slow and weak.Kim
inspected an
army base near the heavily fortified land border
Sunday and urged troops
to strengthen their combat capability and
mental toughness, according to
his office. A day earlier, he visited
Yeonpyeong Island and vowed to
take strong measures to ensure
North Korea would not dare to make more
provocations. Despite the
recent attack, the Defense Ministry believes
it's unlikely North Korea
would launch a full-scale war because it could
not wage a conflict
for long and because of South Korea's solid military
alliance with
the United States, Yonhap news agency reported Sunday
citing the
military. The Yeonpyeong attack came eight months after the
sinking
of a South Korean warship blamed on a North Korean torpedo
attack
- also near the maritime border. Forty-six sailors were killed.
North
Korea has vehemently denied involvement. The Korean War ended
with
an armistice, not a peace treaty, technically leaving the two
countries
still at war. The U.S. stations 28,500 troops in South Korea
to deter
potential aggression from North Korea.
North Korea: U.S.-South drills may trigger war (Dec 6, 2010)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2010-11-30-korea_N.htm
SEOUL - South Korea on Tuesday rejected China's offer to host talks
over
a North Korean attack on its soil as lawmakers here demanded
the
military better prepare the country for the risk of war.Meanwhile,
North
Korea warned that military drills between the United States and
South
Korea could trigger a "full-blown war."Fighter jets from the USS
George
Washington streaked across overcast skies during the drills
taking place
off the west coast of South Korea. Navy Cmdr. Pete
Walczak said no
unusual movements had been detected from North
Korea. "Absolutely
nothing," Walczak said. "A lot of saber-rattling,
fist-shaking, but once
our presence is here, reality says that it's really
nothing."Hong Lei,
spokesman for China's foreign ministry, reiterated
his country's offer
to host emergency talks for envoys from the
nations that comprise the
suspended six-party discussions on North
Korea's nuclear weapons
program. The U.S. and its allies said China
must do more than ask its
ally North Korea to attend a discussion.
"The Chinese have a duty and
obligation" to pressure "the North
Koreans that their belligerent
behavior has to come to an end," White
House spokesman Robert Gibbs
said.
(...) "If North Korea showers Seoul with artillery rounds and rockets,
there are predictions that half of the capital will be destroyed in just
a day," Yoo said according to The Chosun Ilbo, a Seoul newspaper.
"The
only solution is to deliver precise strikes on North Korean
positions
first through a massive air attack in the early stages of a
war."North
Korea also rejected China's offer of talks and slammed the
presence of
the U.S. Navy at the drills taking place south of
Yeonpyeong, which was
shelled Nov. 23, leaving four people dead.
"Our republic has a war
deterrent that can annihilate any aggressor
at once," said the
government-run newspaper Minju Joson. At a
rally in Seoul, Kim Ji Young
gripped flowers and a "No War" placard
and with her other hand took a
microphone at a gathering outside
the South Korean Defense Ministry
headquarters."I am angry at the
war games. They could start a war," says
Kim, 21, a philosophy
student at Ewha Women's University in Seoul. "Our
president is too
strong toward North Korea."At another rally, veterans
tore and burned
North Korean flags and photos of North Korean leader Kim
Jong Il
and his son and heir apparent Kim Jong Un."We've had enough,"
said
Kim Jin Gyu, 64, adding that North Korea deserves punishment. "We
should just smash it up." CLIP - CHECK ALSO
Carter on North Korea:
'We may well have peace'
Spiralling out of Control: The Risk of a New Korean War
(December 4,
2010)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22252
(,,,) President Lee has promised to take a much harder line on North
Korea, and already the South has sent 400,000 propaganda leaflets
across
the border on balloons. (13) There has also been talk of
resuming
loudspeaker broadcasts across the border. The sending of
leaflets was in
violation of a 2004 agreement between the two sides to
halt propaganda
campaigns aimed at each other. By the end of
December, South Korea
plans to hold another round of artillery drills
on islands lying in
disputed waters, including, dismayingly enough,
Yeonpyeong Island.
Nothing could be calculated to be more
provoking under the
circumstances. In preparation for the response
to the drills that are
expected from North Korea, island defenses are
being beefed up. South
Korea has added multiple rocket launchers,
howitzers, missile systems
and advanced precision-guided artillery
to the Yeonpyeong arsenal.
According to a South Korean official,
"We decided to stage the same kind
of fire drill as the one we carried
out on the island on November 23 to
display our determination."
The new drills appear calculated to provoke
a conflict, and this time
South Korea is intent on an asymmetrical
response. The military is
revising its rules of engagement so as to
jettison concerns about
starting a wider conflict. If former Defense
Minister Kim Tae-young
is to believed, if there is another North Korean
strike, then warships
and fighter jets of both South Korea and the U.S.
will launch attacks
on the North. Incoming Defense Minister Kim
Kwan-jin is if anything
even more determined to fan the flames of
conflict into a wider
conflagration. The South Korean military will
immediately launch
"psychological warfare," including, presumably,
loudspeaker
broadcasts across the border. The North has promised to
target
loudspeakers if they are put in operation, and that would in turn
provide the pretext for the South Korean military to launch combat
operations. If there is another exchange of fire with the North, Kim
announced, "We will definitely air raid North Korea." All combat
forces
available would be mobilized, he promised. The newly minted
rules of
engagement are also going to permit "preemptive" strikes
on North Korea
based on the presumption of a possible attack. In
other words, if North
Korea fails to provide a pretext for military action,
the Lee
Administration can attack the North without provocation, if it
chooses
to do so. Lee Myung-bak has already achieved his dream of
demolishing the Sunshine Policy. Relations between the two Koreas
are at
their lowest point since the end of military dictatorship in
South
Korea. Now he aims to deliberately trigger armed conflict in
order to
demonstrate "toughness," and not incidentally, drive the
final nail into
the coffin of the Sunshine Policy. Defense Minister Kim
Kwan-jin feels
that the risk of war is low. "It will be difficult for North
Korea to
conduct a full-scale war because there are some elements
of insecurity
in the country, such as the national economy and power
transfer." Those
may be arguments against North Korea's ability to
successfully sustain a
long-term war over the course of a year or two,
but it seriously
misreads the ability and will of the North Korean
military to put up a
determined fight. The extent of possible South
Korean air strikes on the
North is not clear, but anything other than
an extremely limited and
localized action is likely to trigger total war.
And that is a war that
the U.S. will inevitably be drawn into. Even
presuming a quick defeat of
the North (which would be unlikely),
eighty percent of North Korea is
mountainous, providing ideal
terrain for North Korean forces to conduct
guerrilla warfare. The
U.S. could find itself involved in another
failing military occupation.
With both sides heavily armed, the
consequences could be much
worse for Koreans, and casualties could reach
alarming totals. Four
million Koreans died in the Korean War. Even one
percent of that
total in a new war would be unconscionable, and Lee
Myung-bak is
deluded if he believes he can ride the tiger of armed
conflict and
remain in control of the path it takes.
Note from Jean: (I wrote this over a week ago when I first tried
to
make sense of it all). Around the world there is a bit of a media
frenzy over the release of these classified US documents and it is
certainly interesting to see what comes to the light now - after
having
been carefully filtered by Wikileaks in conjunction with 5
global
newspapers and some vetting of critically sensible
information by the US
itself. As you'll discover if you delve into
this mass of information,
much of it is of a relatively trivial nature
with little long term
impact. In a couple weeks from now everyone
will have moved on to the
next BIG NEWS of the day and it will all
soon be forgotten - just as
what happened to the information
recently revealed through Wikileaks on
the Afghan and Iraq
war
logs now nearly invisible in the world's rear-view mirror. What
is
REALLY important in this NOT so coincidental release of material
is
once again hidden in plain view, but diluted for the moment in
the mass
of trivia that fascinates so many. You'll see that there is
already ONE
BIG THING that will keep coming up in the media,
which may very well
explain why this was done, and it is the
revelation - which being done
in this manner makes it
indisputable in everyone's gullible mind - that
North Korea has
sold to Iran advanced Russian-designed missile
technology that
may soon allow this uncontrollable (by the Cabal)
country to
threaten European capitals with potentially nuclear-tipped
intermediate range missiles, and possibly even Washington in the
near
future once the Iranian have figured out how to build
intercontinental
ballistic missiles, all of which constitutes a
'wonderful', convenient
justification for launching a US/Israel
-lead preemptive nuclear attack
against Iran, the perfect trigger -
in the Cabal's view - to blow the
global power keg.
Another telling Wikileaks revelation is the fact that, privately, all
Arab countries around Iran want the US to "cut the snake's head",
another convenient psychological justification-for-war element.
There is
also the troubling matter of Pakistan's quickly expanding
nuclear
arsenal and the alleged fear that some hypothetical non-
CIA controlled
terrorist group could put its hands on Pakistani
nuclear material in the
event of a meltdown of the military control
over its fissile material
and weapons, which to me is only a
diversionary psy-op tactic because I
believe that, in fact, the
CIA/Cabal has a firm control over Pakistan's
military establishment
and if ever some nuclear material is leaked to
some patsy terrorist
group, it will be with their clear but covert
approval as part of a plan
hatched to create a false flag dirty bomb
event in some US city to
justify retaliating against Iran - same model
as the 9/11 pretext
to attack Iraq.
Now, very little attention is paid in the propaganda media to the
mysterious source [I don't believe
Bradley
Manning is this source.
That's just another diversion. More on this
below...] at the origin of
all the material released to
Wikileaks over the past year, to
the
motivations behind this massive leaking, and especially to the long
term ramifications of this strategic move by the tight group of
powerful
men - the infamous dark cabal/shadow government - who
are possibly the
only ones with enough string-pulling power to
achieve such a feat
without being detected. Some have called this
event a sort of new 9/11
and there is some truth to it as once again
a highly secret cabal has
mastered a feat of global mind
manipulation towards the furtherance of
its world domination
agenda. I feel it is important to keep this
perspective in mind over
the coming weeks and months so as to better
understand the moves
made on the global chessboard by the worldly agents
of the reptilian
entities who, from their deep underground lairs, battle
with the
galactic federation to keep control of this planet, a battle we
are here
to help turn to the Light Forces's advantage as part of our own
"deep
penetration" covert mission of redemption... if you see what I
mean.
It is up to us now to not get fooled with this whole cooked up
affair
and to turn this, aikido-like, into an opportunity to further
enlighten
everyone about the Cabal's many shenanigans and the
duplicitous
nature of their covertly controlled governments and media...
including Wikileaks!
This being said, I must add that it is very likely that most if not all
people involved in Wikileaks definitely have their heart at the right
place and are convinced they are doing this for the greater good of
all.
They certainly deserve our kudos and support for their courage
and
persistence, even if some of the information they are leaking
has been
planted there to further the Cabal's agenda as I surmise
above. Also it
is probable that there will be unintended
consequences to all this
exposure of government's dealings, some
of which may not turn out to be
exactly supportive of the Cabal's
covert agenda.
Here is also what ERN subscriber Jeff Wefferson
(therockist@yahoo.com)
from Australia wrote about this issue:
"In case you haven't noticed, the
entire "classified" infrastructure
of the United States government has
recently been compromised
by a lone individual wielding a memory stick,
who has
mysteriously accessed a vast amount of top-secret government
information and provided it all to the global public via...yes,
Wiki-Leaks! Or so the story goes that is appearing all over the
mainstream media. There's a reason why this story sounds so
much like
that of the 19 box-cutter-wielding "hijackers" who flew
four hijacked
planes over half of America while the entire U.S. Air
Force 'stood
down', flew two of them into the World Trade Centres
and one into the
Pentagon, causing both towers to collapse into
their own footprint. Both
stories are equally bogus crocks of shite
concocted by the same psy-ops
think-tanks in the basement of CIA
hq in Langley Virginia. 9/11 and its
mainstream story were the
"problems" created by the NWO and PNAC to
provide a "new Pearl
Harbor" which would justify an astronomically
lucrative "war on
terror", their "solution" to not having a credible
global "enemy"
since Communism ate it. Because of 9/11 and its official
story,
otherwise intelligent people have sat and watched while every
right
they had, every dollar they earn, every thought they think has
been
systematically taken from them in the name of the "war on terror."
The internet has long been the one glimmer of hope that we had with
respect to being able to exchange information by-passing the global
media mono-culture, so that, for those of us who still care, we could
formulate a picture of what is REALLY going on. This "Wiki-leaks"
thing
is nothing more than a "9/11" against the internet as we currently
know
it. Obama: "We must seize this opportunity to preserve freedom
and
democracy by cracking down on those who would abuse the
privilege of the
free internet to subvert the peaceful intentions of the
United States of
America. God bless us all. Amen. ps. Yes, we can!"
BEWARE: as usual,
things are NOT what they seem."
MUCH MORE ON THIS IN THE NEXT ARTICLES BELOW
From:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,731580,00.html
The US Diplomatic Leaks -
A Superpower's View of the World
By SPIEGEL Staff - 11/28/2010
251,000 State Department documents, many of them
secret embassy reports
from around the world, show
how the US seeks to safeguard its influence
around the
world. It is nothing short of a political meltdown for US
foreign policy.
What does the United States really think of German
Chancellor Angela
Merkel? Is she a reliable ally? Did
she really make an effort to patch
up relations with
Washington that had been so damaged by her
predecessor? At most, it was a half-hearted one.
The tone of trans-Atlantic relations may have improved,
former US
Ambassador to Germany William Timken
wrote in a cable to the State
Department at the end of
2006, but the chancellor "has not taken bold
steps yet to
improve the substantive content of the relationship."
That
is not exactly high praise.
And the verdict on German Foreign Minister Guido
Westerwelle? His
thoughts "were short on substance,"
wrote the current US ambassador in
Berlin, Philip Murphy,
in a cable. The reason, Murphy suggested, was
that
"Westerwelle's command of complex foreign and security
policy
issues still requires deepening."
Such comments are hardly friendly. But in the eyes of the
American
diplomatic corps, every actor is quickly
categorized as a friend or foe.
King Abdullah of Saudi
Arabia? A friend: Abdullah can't stand his
neighbors in
Iran and, expressing his disdain for the mullah regime,
said, "there is no doubt something unstable about them
." And his ally,
Sheikh bin Zayed of Abu Dhabi? Also a
friend. He believes "a near term
conventional war with Iran
is clearly preferable to the long term
consequences of a
nuclear armed Iran."
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's emissaries also learn
of a special
"Iran observer" in the Azerbaijani capital of
Baku who reports on a
dispute that played out during a
meeting of Iran's Supreme National
Security Council. An
enraged Revolutionary Guard Chief of Staff Mohammed
Ali Jafari allegedly got into a heated argument with
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
and slapped him in the face
because the generally conservative president
had,
surprisingly, advocated freedom of the press.
A Political Meltdown
Such surprises from the annals of US diplomacy will
dominate the
headlines in the coming days when the
New York Times, London's Guardian,
Paris' Le Monde,
Madrid's El Pais and SPIEGEL begin shedding light on
the treasure trove of secret documents from the State
Department.
Included are 243,270 diplomatic cables
filed by US embassies to the
State Department and 8,017
directives that the State Department sent to
its diplomatic
outposts around the world. In the coming days, the
participating media will show in a series of investigative
stories how
America seeks to steer the world. The
development is no less than a
political meltdown for
American foreign policy.
Never before in history has a superpower lost control of
such vast
amounts of such sensitive information -- data
that can help paint a
picture of the foundation upon which
US foreign policy is built. Never
before has the trust
America's partners have in the country been as
badly
shaken. Now, their own personal views and policy
recommendations
have been made public -- as have
America's true views of them.
For example, one can learn that German Defense Minister
Karl-Theodor zu
Guttenberg, the Germany's most beloved
politician according to public
opinion polls, openly
criticizes fellow cabinet member Guido Westerwelle
in
conversations with US diplomats, and even snitches on
him. Or that
Secretary of State Clinton wants her
ambassadors in Moscow and Rome to
inform her whether
there is anything to the rumors that Italian
President Silvio
Berlusconi and Vladimir Putin have private business
ties in
addition to their close friendship -- whispers that both have
vehemently denied.
America's ambassadors can be merciless in their
assessments of the
countries in which they are stationed.
That's their job. Kenya? A swamp
of flourishing corruption
extending across the country. Fifteen
high-ranking Kenyan
officials are already banned from traveling to the
United
States, and almost every single sentence in the embassy
reports
speaks with disdain of the government of President
Mwai Kibaki and Prime
Minister Raila Odinga.
Weighing Public Interest against Confidentiality
Turkey hardly comes away any less scathed in the cables.
Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the cables allege,
governs with the help of a
cabal of incompetent advisors.
Ankara Embassy officials depict a country
on a path to an
Islamist future -- a future that likely won't include
European
Union membership.
As with the close to 92,000 documents on the war in
Afghanistan at the
end of July and the almost 400,000
documents on the Iraq war recently
released, the State
Department cables have also been leaked to the
WikiLeaks
whistleblower platform -- and they presumably came from
the
same source. As before, WikiLeaks has provided the
material to media
partners to review and analyze.
With a team of more than 50 reporters and researchers,
SPIEGEL has
viewed, analyzed and vetted the mass of
documents. In most cases, the
magazine has sought to
protect the identities of the Americans'
informants, unless
the person who served as the informant was senior
enough
to be politically relevant. In some cases, the US government
expressed security concerns and SPIEGEL accepted a
number of such
objections. In other cases, however,
SPIEGEL felt the public interest in
reporting the news was
greater than the threat to security. Throughout
our research,
SPIEGEL reporters and editors weighed the public interest
against the justified interest of countries in security and
confidentiality.
In a statement, a spokesperson for the White House
condemned the
impending publication of the documents
by WikiLeaks as "reckless and
dangerous." The cables,
which contain "candid and often incomplete
information,"
are not an expression of policy and do not always shape
final policy decisions, the statement reads. "Such
disclosures put at
risk our diplomats, intelligence
professionals, and people around the
world," the
spokesperson said. The fact that "private conversations"
are
now being made public "can deeply impact not only
US foreign policy
interests, but those of our allies and
friends around the world."
It is now possible to view many political developments
around the world
through the lens of those who
participated in those events. As such, our
understanding
of those events is deeply enriched. That alone is often
enough to place transparency ahead of national
regulations regarding
confidentiality.
Following the leaks of military secrets from Afghanistan
and Iraq, these
leaks now put US diplomats on the hot
seat. It is the third coup for
WikiLeaks within six months,
and it is one that is likely to leave
Washington feeling
more than a bit exposed. Around half of the cables
that
have been obtained aren't classified and slightly less,
40.5
percent, as classified as "confidential." Six percent
of the reports, or
16,652 cables, are labelled as "secret"
and of those, 4,330 are so
explosive that they are labelled
"NOFORN," meaning access should not be
made available
to non-US nationals. Taken together, the cables provide
enough raw text to fill 66 years' worth of weekly SPIEGEL
magazines.
Gossip and the Unvarnished Truth
Much in the material was noted and sent because those
compiling the
reports or their dialogue partners believed,
with some certainty, that
their transcripts would not be
made public for the next 25 years. That
may also explain
why the ambassadors and emissaries from Washington
were
so willing to report gossip and hearsay back to State
Department
headquarters. One cable from the Moscow
Embassy on Russian first lady
Svetlana Medvedeva, for
example, states that she is "generating tensions
between
the camps and remains the subject of avid gossip." It then
goes
on to report that President Medvedev's wife had
already drawn up a list
of officials who should be made to
"suffer" in their careers because
they had been disloyal to
Medvedev. Another reports that the wife of
Azerbaijan
leader Ilham Aliyev has had so much plastic surgery that
it
is possible to confuse her for one of her daughters from
a distance, but
that she can barely still move her face.
What makes the documents particularly appealing, though,
is that many
politicians speak the unvarnished truth,
confident as they are that
their musings will never be
made public.
What, though, do the thousands of documents prove?
Do they really show a
US which has the world on a leash?
Are Washington's embassies still
self-contained power
centers in their host countries?
In sum, probably not. In the major crisis regions, an image
emerges of a
superpower that can no longer truly be
certain of its allies -- like in
Pakistan, where the Americans
are consumed by fear that the unstable
nuclear power
could become precisely the place where terrorists obtain
dangerous nuclear material.
There are similar fears in Yemen, where the US, against
its better
judgement, allows itself to be instrumentalized
by an unscrupulous
leader. With American military aid
that was intended for the fight
against al-Qaida, Ali
Abdullah Saleh is now able to wage his battle
against
enemy tribes in the northern part of the country.
Insult to Injury
Even after the fall of Saddam Hussein, it still remained a
challenge for
the victorious power to assert its will on Iraq.
In Baghdad, which has
seen a series of powerful US
ambassadors -- men the international press
often like to r
efer to as American viceroys -- it is now up to Vice
President
Joe Biden to make repeated visits to allied Iraqi politicians
in an effort to get them to finally establish a respectable
democracy.
But the embassy cables make it very clear that
Obama's deputy has made
little headway.
Instead, the Americans are forced to endure the endless
tirades of
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarek, who claims to
have always known that
the Iraq war was the "biggest
mistake ever committed" and who advised
the Americans to
"forget about democracy in Iraq." Once the US forces
depart,
Mubarak said, the best way to ensure a peaceful transition is
for there to be a military coup. They are statements that add
insult to
injury.
On the whole, the cables from the Middle East expose the
superpower's
weaknesses. Washington has always viewed it
as vital to its survival to
secure its share of energy reserves,
but the world power is often
quickly reduced to becoming a
plaything of diverse interests. And it is
drawn into the
animosities between Arabs and Israelis, Shiites and
Sunnis,
between Islamists and secularists, between despots and
kings.
Often enough, the lesson of the documents that have
now been obtained,
is that the Arab leaders use their friends
in Washington to expand their
own positions of power.
---
Related articles, information and video:
Russians Refuted US Claim of Iranian Missile Threat to
Europe (Nov 30,
2010)
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=53720
Washington - A diplomatic cable from last February released
by Wikileaks
provides a detailed account of how Russian
specialists on the Iranian
ballistic missile programme refuted
the U.S. suggestion that Iran has
missiles that could target
European capitals or intends to develop such
a capability.In
fact, the Russians challenged the very existence of the
mystery missile the U.S. claims Iran acquired from North
Korea. But
readers of the two leading U.S. newspapers never
learned those key facts
about the document. The New York
Times and Washington Post reported only
that the United
States believed Iran had acquired such missiles -
supposedly
called the BM-25 - from North Korea. Neither newspaper
reported the detailed Russian refutation of the U.S. view on
the issue
or the lack of hard evidence for the BM-25 from
the U.S. side. CLIP
Israel gets a pass in new 'Wikileaks' - Focus is on Iran
(NOVEMBER 28,
2010)
http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/2010/11/israel-
gets-pass-in-new-wikileaks-focus.html
Julian Assange said the release of classified US documents
will cover
"every major issue" in the world while Benjamin
Netanyahu said material
concerning Israel will not be the
focal point of a new exposé by the
whistle-blowing website
WikiLeaks. "Israel is not the center of
international attention"
declared a confident Netanyahu.You can't have
it both ways
fellows. Israel does stand at the center of every major
issue
in the middle east and in manipulating U.S. foreign policy.
There
will be nothing new revealed about the crimes of Israel
but plenty about
their 'enemies.' U.S. spying is featured but
Israeli spying seems to be
missing.From the JPost ... note
that one of the first 'leaks' to come
out and promoted by the
Israeli press is about North Korea and linking
them to Iran.
Very convenient in light of the present North and South
Korea 'crisis.' Barak encourages attack on Iran, N. Korea.
The document,
dated June 2, 2009 and sent from the
American Embassy in Tel Aviv,
details Barak's visit with a
two Congressional delegations. It quotes
Barak as saying
that "'no option should be removed from the table' when
confronting Iran and North Korea.""Barak asked rhetorically
how a lack
of firm response to North Korea would be
interpreted by Iran's
leadership, speculating the US
government would be viewed as a 'paper
tiger'," the
diplomatic cable reads. CLIP
Secret US Embassy Cables
http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/
Wikileaks began on Sunday November 28th publishing
251,287 leaked United
States embassy cables, the largest
set of confidential documents ever to
be released into the
public domain. The documents will give people
around
the world an unprecedented insight into US Government
foreign
activities. The cables, which date from 1966 up
until the end of
February this year, contain confidential
communications between 274
embassies in countries
throughout the world and the State Department in
Washington DC. 15,652 of the cables are classified Secret.
The embassy
cables will be released in stages over the
next few months. The subject
matter of these cables is of
such importance, and the geographical
spread so broad,
that to do otherwise would not do this material
justice.
The cables show the extent of US spying on its allies and
the
UN; turning a blind eye to corruption and human rights
abuse in "client
states"; backroom deals with supposedly
neutral countries; lobbying for
US corporations; and the
measures US diplomats take to advance those who
have
access to them. This document release reveals the
contradictions
between the US’s public persona and what
it says behind closed doors –
and shows that if citizens
in a democracy want their governments to
reflect their
wishes, they should ask to see what’s going on behind the
scenes. Every American schoolchild is taught that George
Washington –
the country’s first President – could not tell
a lie. If the
administrations of his successors lived up to
the same principle,
today’s document flood would be a
mere embarrassment. Instead, the US
Government has
been warning governments -- even the most corrupt --
around the world about the coming leaks and is bracing
itself for the
exposures. The full set consists of 251,287
documents, comprising
261,276,536 words (seven times
the size of "The Iraq War Logs", the
world's previously
largest classified information release). The cables
cover
from 28th December 1966 to 28th February 2010 and
originate from
274 embassies, consulates and diplomatic
missions. How to explore the
data - Search for events
that you remember that happened for example
in your
country. You can browse by date or search for an origin
near
you. Pick out interesting events and tell others about
them. Use
twitter, reddit, mail whatever suits your audience
best.
WikiLeaks Documents Show Hillary Clinton Authorized US
to Spy on Foreign
Diplomats (29 November 2010)
http://www.truth-out.org/wikileaks-documents-show-hillary
-clinton-authorized-us-spy-foreign-diplomats65506
As the WikiLeaks documents steadily reveal more and more
controversial
actions taken by the government in its
international operations, one
report from July 2009 shows
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
authorizing US diplomats
to spy and collect personal information on
members of
foreign agencies.(...) The cable also requested the "current
technical specifications, physical layout, and planned
upgrades to
telecommunications infrastructure and
information systems, networks, and
technologies used by
top officials and their support staffs," as well as
"details on
commercial and private VIP networks used for official
communications, to include upgrades, security measures,
passwords,
personal encryption keys, and types of VPN
versions used."In a statement
on November 28, 2010, White
House press secretary Robert Gibbs said the
documents
were "not an expression of policy," but could nevertheless
"compromise private discussions with foreign governments
and opposition
leaders." "President Obama supports
responsible, accountable, and open
government at home
and around the world, but this reckless and dangerous
action
runs counter to that goal. By releasing stolen and classified
documents, Wikileaks has put at risk not only the cause of
human rights
but also the lives and work of these individuals.
We condemn in the
strongest terms the unauthorized
disclosure of classified documents and
sensitive national
security information."Clinton held a press briefing
Monday
to respond to the leak and said that the U.S. "deeply
regrets"
the release of classified information, promising
to take bold action
against the theft."I want to make clear
that our official foreign policy
is not set through these
messages, but here in Washington," Clinton
said. "I would
also add that to the American people and to our friends
and partners … we are taking aggressive steps to hold
responsible those
who stole this information."
AN INTERACTIVE ATLAS OF THE DIPLOMATIC CABLES
http://www.spiegel.de/flash/flash-24861.html
A time lapse of 251,287 documents: The world map shows
where the
majority of the cables originated from, and where
they had the highest
level of classification.
A cache of diplomatic cables provides a chronicle of the
United States'
relations with the world.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/world/statessecrets.html
Iran Fortifies Its Arsenal With the Aid of North Korea
(November 28,
2010)
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/29/world/middleeast/
29missiles.html
Secret American intelligence assessments have concluded
that Iran has
obtained a cache of advanced missiles, based
on a Russian design, that
are much more powerful than
anything Washington has publicly conceded
that Tehran
has in its arsenal, diplomatic cables show. Iran obtained
19
of the missiles from North Korea, according to a cable
dated Feb. 24 of
this year. The cable is a detailed, highly
classified account of a
meeting between top Russian
officials and an American delegation led by
Vann H. Van
Diepen, an official with the State Department's
nonproliferation division who, as a national intelligence
officer
several years ago, played a crucial role in the 2007
assessment of
Iran's nuclear capacity. The missiles could
for the first time give Iran
the capacity to strike at capitals
in Western Europe or easily reach
Moscow, and American
officials warned that their advanced propulsion
could
speed Iran's development of intercontinental ballistic
missiles.
There has been scattered but persistent
speculation on the topic since
2006, when fragmentary
reports surfaced that North Korea might have sold
Iran
missiles based on a Russian design called the R-27,
once used
aboard Soviet submarines to carry nuclear
warheads. In the unclassified
world, many arms control
experts concluded that isolated components made
their
way to Iran, but there has been little support for the idea
that
complete missiles, with their huge thrusters, had
been secretly shipped.
The Feb. 24 cable, which is among
those obtained by WikiLeaks and made
available to a
number of news organizations, makes it clear that
American intelligence agencies believe that the complete
shipment indeed
took place, and that Iran is taking pains
to master the technology in an
attempt to build a new
generation of missiles. The missile intelligence
also
suggests far deeper military - and perhaps nuclear -
cooperation
between North Korea and Iran than was
previously known. At the request
of the Obama
administration, The New York Times has agreed not to
publish the text of the cable.The North Korean version of
the advanced
missile, known as the BM-25, could carry
a nuclear warhead. Many experts
say that Iran remains
some distance from obtaining a nuclear warhead,
especially one small enough to fit atop a missile, though
they believe
that it has worked hard to do so. Still, the
BM-25 would be a
significant step up for Iran. CLIP
Wiki-Leaks Serves Israeli Agenda Of Demonizing Iran
(30 Nov 2010)
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/218807
The US Embassy Cables
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/the-us-embassy-cables
WikiLeaks cables expose Pakistan nuclear fears
(30 November 2010)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/30/wikileaks-
cables-pakistan-nuclear-fears
US and UK diplomats warn of terrorists getting hold of
fissile material
and of Pakistan-India nuclear exchange --
American and British diplomats
fear Pakistan's nuclear
weapons programme could lead to fissile material
falling
into the hands of terrorists or a devastating nuclear
exchange
with India. The latest cache of US embassy
cables released by WikiLeaks
contains warnings that
Pakistan is rapidly building its nuclear
stockpile despite
the country's growing instability and "pending
economic
catastrophe". Mariot Leslie, a senior British Foreign Office
official, told US diplomats in September 2009: "The UK
has deep concerns
about the safety and security of
Pakistan's nuclear weapons," according
to one cable
classified "secret/noforn [no foreign nationals]". Seven
months earlier the US ambassador to Islamabad, Anne
Patterson, cabled to
Washington: "Our major concern is
not having an Islamic militant steal
an entire weapon but
rather the chance someone working in government of
Pakistan facilities could gradually smuggle enough
material out to
eventually make a weapon." The leak of
classified US diplomatic
correspondence exposes in
detail the deep tensions between Washington
and
Islamabad over a broad range of issues, including
counter-terrorism,
Afghanistan and finance, as well as
the nuclear question. The cables
also revealed that:
* Small teams of US special forces have been
operating
secretly inside Pakistan's tribal areas, with Pakistani
government approval, while senior ministers have
privately supported US
drone attacks. * The ambassador
starkly informed Washington that "no
amount of money"
from the US would stop the Pakistani army backing
Islamist militants and the Afghan Taliban insurgency.
* The US concluded
Pakistani troops were responsible
for a spate of extrajudicial killings
in the Swat Valley
and tribal belt but decided not to comment publicly
to
allow the army to take action on its own. * Diplomats
in Islamabad
were asked by the Pentagon to survey
refugee camps on the Afghan border,
possibly for air
strike targeting information. * The president, Asif
Ali
Zardari - whose wife, Benazir Bhutto was
assassinated - has made
extensive preparations in
case he too is killed, and once told the US
vice-
president, Joe Biden, that he feared the military "might
take me
out". Pakistan's rulers are so sensitive about
their much-prized nuclear
weapons that in July 2009
they stalled on a previously agreed plan for
the US to
recover and dispose of highly enriched uranium spent
fuel from
a nuclear research reactor, in the interests of
preventing proliferation
and theft. They told the US
embassy: "If the local media got word of the
fuel removal,
"they certainly would portray it as the US taking
Pakistan's nuclear weapons". US fears over Pakistan were
spelled out in
an intelligence briefing in 2008. "Despite
pending economic catastrophe,
Pakistan is
producing
nuclear weapons at a faster rate than any other country in
the world," the secret cable said. CLIP
U.S. Chases Foreign Leaders' DNA, WikiLeaks Shows
(November 29, 2010)
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/u-s-chases-
foreign-leaders-dna-wikileaks-shows/
Foreign potentates and diplomats beware: the United States
wants your
DNA.If that chief of mission seemed a bit too
friendly at the last
embassy party, it might be because the
State Department recently
instructed U.S. diplomats to
collect biometric identification on their
foreign interlocutors.
The search for the most personal information of
all is
contained in WikiLeaks' latest publication of tens of
thousands
of sensitive diplomatic cables.A missive from
the Secretary of State's
office in April 2009 asked diplomats
in Africa to step up their
assistance to U.S. intelligence.
Not only should diplomats in Burundi,
Rwanda and Congo
collect basic biographical information on the people
they
talk to - a routine diplomatic function - but they should also
gather "fingerprints, facial images, DNA, and iris scans."
CLIP
Why Wikileaks is Good for Democracy
(November 30, 2010) Yeah, yeah...
And peeing is good for everyone!
http://www.counterpunch.org/quigley11302010.html
Since 9-11, the US government, through Presidents Bush
and Obama, has
increasingly told the US public that
"state secrets" will not be shared
with citizens. Candidate
Obama pledged to reduce the use of state
secrets, but
President Obama continued the Bush tradition. The
Courts
and Congress and international allies have gone
meekly along with the
escalating secrecy demands of
the US Executive. By labeling tens of
millions of
documents secret, the US government has created a
huge
vacuum of information. But information is the
lifeblood of democracy.
Information about government
contributes to a healthy democracy.
Transparency and
accountability are essential elements of good
government. Likewise, "a lack of government
transparency and
accountability undermines
democracy and gives rise to cynicism and
mistrust,
" according to a 2008 Harris survey commissioned by
the
Association of Government Accountants. Into the
secrecy vacuum stepped
Private Bradley Manning, who,
according to the Associated Press, was
able to defeat
"Pentagon security systems using little more than a
Lady
Gaga CD and a portable computer memory stick
."Manning apparently sent
the information to Wikileaks
- a non profit media organization, which
specializes
in publishing leaked information. Wikileaks in turn
shared
the documents to other media around the world
including the New York
Times and published much of
it on its website. CLIP - NOTE from Jean:
Don't you think
that this crappy explanation about how a 22 year old
"hacker" managed to circumvent the most sophisticated
cyber protection
money can buy using only a "Lady
Gaga CD and a portable computer memory
stick" is just
as implausible as the discovery, minutes after the
planes
crashed into the World Trade Center, of evidence
linking a group of
Saudi terrorist to this false flag
attack?... This poor Bradley Manning
is just a fall guy,
a "patsy scapegoat sucker dupe victim stooge
whipping boy" paraded in front of the propaganda
media to "explain"
those darn leaks... Oh! and BTW
just like Osama Bin Laden, they will
never "catch"
Julian Assange... Well as long as he will be useful to
them... But some are getting so 'excited' about this
that someone in the
inner circle of Stephen Harper is
even calling for his death:
Censors block
WikiLeaks website; Interpol issues arrest order;
Canada
demands Assange be killed
Cyberattack Against WikiLeaks Was Weak
(November 29, 2010)
A
MAKE-BELIEVE SMOKESCREEN ATTACK FOR
PLAUSIBLE DENIAL PURPOSE?
"Look! We
tried to punish them so everyone knows we
are angry at them. It cannot
possibly be us who are
behing these darn leaks!"
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/wikileaks
-attack/
In the first test of WikiLeaks' resiliency since a staff
rebellion
earlier this year, the organization recovered
within hours from a
distributed denial-of-service attack
during its rollout of leaked State
Department cables
Sunday. But experts who monitored the disruptive
traffic
say the attack was relatively modest in size.WikiLeaks'
main web
address and its "cablegate" site were
unreachable as the organization's
media partners
published their first analyses from a massive trove of a
quarter-million U.S. diplomatic cables Sunday
afternoon. Hours earlier,
WikiLeaks wrote on Twitter:
"We are currently under a mass distributed
denial-of-
service attack." But Arbor Networks, which analyzes
malicious
network traffic crossing the internet's
backbones, reports that the DDoS
generated between
2 and 4 Gbps of disruptive traffic, slightly above the
average for all DDoS attacks, but well below the peak
60 to 100 Gbps
consumed by truly massive attacks
against other websites over the last
year. CLIP
WikiLeaks Reveals Iran's Secret, Worldwide Arms Hunt
(November 28, 2010)
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/wikileaks
-reveals-irans-secret-worldwide-arms-hunt/
Guns and ammo from Turkey. Missile components from
Germany. Guidance
systems from China. Iran is on a
global, clandestine mission to acquire
weapons and
weapons technologies of all sorts, diplomatic cables
released Sunday by WikiLeaks reveal. And the Tehran
regime is using a
series of front companies in its attempt
to assemble the arsenal. In a
cable from February of 2010,
State Department officials in Washington
alert the staff at
the U.S. embassy in Beijing that a Malaysia-based
firm,
Electronics Component Limited (ECL), is trying to buy
three-axis
fiber optic gyroscopes from a Chinese
company. This isn't just a simple
business deal, the
dispatch makes clear. Gyroscopes measure orientation,
which makes them a critical component of weapons'
inertial navigation
systems. These particular gyroscopes,
the State Department warns, "would
be suitable for use
in the guidance systems of ballistic missiles,
cruise
missiles, and unmanned aerial vehicles."Worse, the cable
adds,
"ECL is part of a network of Iranian-controlled front
companies that…
procures sensitive goods on behalf of
a number of Iranian entities of
proliferation concern,
including the Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group
(SHIG),
which is Iran's primary developer of liquid propellant
ballistic
missiles." The warning is part of a common
thread emerging from
WikiLeaks' three major document
dumps. These diplomatic dispatches,
along with war logs
from Afghanistan and Iraq, detail a globe-spanning
Cold
War between Iran and the United States. Each side has
its proxies,
each side provides weapons to those allies,
and each side uses the game
of global diplomacy to
corral the other's ambitions. "The metaphor most
commonly deployed by Jordanian officials when
discussing Iran is of an
octopus whose tentacles reach
out insidiously to manipulate, foment, and
undermine
the best laid plans of the West and regional moderates,
" one
WikiLeaked cable reports. CLIP
Will Israel Attack Iran By Christmas? (28 NOV 2010)
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_
dish/2010/11/will-israel-attack-iran-by-christmas.html
To me, the most revealing parts of the Wikileaks diplo-
docu-dump are
about the Middle East. We already knew
that the Sunni Arab autocrats
cannot bear the thought
of a Shiite nuclear bomb and are almost as
worried as
the Israelis. But now the evidentiary proof brings it
home:
The Saudi king was recorded as having "frequently
exhorted the US
to attack Iran to put an end to its nuclear
weapons programme", one
cable stated. "He told you
[Americans] to cut off the head of the
snake," the Saudi
ambassador to Washington, Adel al-Jubeir said,
according to a report on Abdullah's meeting with the US
general David
Petraeus in April 2008.The cables also
highlight Israel's anxiety to
preserve its regional nuclear
monopoly, its readiness to go it alone
against Iran –
and its unstinting attempts to influence American policy
.
The defence minister, Ehud Barak, estimated in June
2009 that there was
a window of "between six and 18
months from now in which stopping Iran
from acquiring
nuclear weapons might still be viable". After that, Barak
said, "any military solution would result in unacceptable
collateral
damage."Officials in Jordan and Bahrain have
openly called for Iran's
nuclear programme to be stopped
by any means, including military.
Leaders in Saudi Arabia,
the United Arab Emirates and Egypt referred to
Iran as
"evil", an "existential threat" and a power that "is going
to
take us to war".If we take Barak's word for it, the Israelis
could
launch World War III within a month. And would
carry much of the Sunni
Arab autocrats with it. One notes
that Saudi foreign diplomats and
functionaries are more
wary about war with Iran than the royals. But
there seems
little discussion about the momentous consequences of
a
third war launched by the West against a Muslim country
in less than a
decade.
WikiLeaks Reveals Everybody's Christmas List:
The World Wants Drones
(November 29, 2010)
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/wikileaks
-reveals-everybodys-christmas-list-the-world-wants-drones/
Black Friday has passed, but the holidays are upon us and
shopping days
are increasingly few. Having a hard time
finding the perfect gift for
that tiny emirate hoping to
psych out Iran or the large NATO ally
looking to fight
terrorism in Iraq? Fortunately for you, WikiLeaks has
r
evealed the number one item atop seemingly everybody's
wish list:
drones. Only a select few close American allies
have the
export-restricted Predator B (a.k.a. MQ-9 Reaper)
armed drones, but that
hasn't stopped countries from the
United Arab Emirates to Turkey from
pestering & pleading
with America to sell them the shiniest new toy, the
WikiLeaks document show. The United Arab Emirates, a
tiny nation of 5
million already protected by a U.S. military
presence in the country,
has been looking to purchase
only the latest and greatest military
technology for a while
now, outbuying Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and
Taiwan to
become the American military's top buyer last fiscal year.
The
WikiLeaks documents show that in 2007, UAE officials
pressed then Air
Force chief of staff General Michael
Moseley and then Central Command
chief General John
Abizaid during official visits to sell them the armed
Predator B drone as part of their shopping spree. CLIP
Blocked! WikiLeaks Shows How Iran's Air Defense Deal
Died (November 29,
2010)
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/11/blocked-
wikileaks-shows-how-irans-air-defense-deal-died/
For two years, U.S. diplomats and Israeli leaders steadily
implored
Russia not to sell Iran a powerful anti-aircraft
missile that both
feared could turn air strikes against
Iranian nuclear facilities into a
fiasco. Stopping the sale
of the S-300 missile, an issue obscure to all
but
obsessive observers of the region, became a secret test
for American
diplomacy at the highest levels."For better
or for worse," John Beyrle,
the U.S. ambassador to
Russia cabled back to Washington in February
2009,
"the delivery of S-300's have become a barometer of
our bilateral
relations."It turned out to be a positive
indicator. In September,
Russian officials announced
the cancellation of a years-old agreement to
sell Iran a
potentially game-changing air defense system. The
Iranians
have been crying foul ever since, vowing to take
Russia to court over
the end of an arms transfer worth
an estimated $800 million. But it's
hardly a mere
financial issue. The S-300 can shoot down enemy
aircraft
from up to 200 kilometers away, making it a
system that "scares every
Western air force," in the
words of defense analyst Dan Goure. No wonder
the
U.S. and Israel worked aggressively to stop the sale - an
effort
whose scale is detailed in the diplomatic cables
released on Sunday by
the anti-secrecy organization
WikiLeaks. Almost as soon as the Obama
administration
came into office, diplomats in the Mideast were ordered
to turn regional fears of Iran into pressure on Russia not
to follow
through on the missile sale. CLIP
WikiLeaks' Cablegate: The Taiwanese Animated Version
- EXCELLENT AND
FUNNY!
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/cablegate-
animated/
The Taiwanese news-animation company NMA has
distilled the global
diplomatic furor sparked by the State
Department cable leak into a
90-second computer
generated highlight reel. Think of it as worldwide
anarchy
in a CGI format.
Sweden issues international arrest warrant for WikiLeaks
founder Assange
(19 November 2010)
http://wsws.org/articles/2010/nov2010/assa-n19.shtml
Swedish authorities, stepping up their persecution of
WikiLeaks founder
Julian Assange, have issued an
international arrest warrant for his
detention in relation to
trumped-up “rape” charges.Sweden’s Director of
Prosecution, Marianne Ny, claims that Assange needs to be
questioned.
“So far, we have not been able to meet with
him to accomplish the
interrogations,” she said. The court
ruling will allow prosecutors to
seek assistance from other
nations to have him arrested.The case against
Assange is
aimed at discrediting or weakening WikiLeaks, which has
made
public hundreds of thousands of secret US
documents exposing the
criminal character of the
invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and
Iraq.
(See “
The
WikiLeaks documents and the rape of Iraq”)
The Swedish prosecutor’s
campaign has all the hallmarks
of a “dirty tricks” operation organized
or encouraged by
either the Pentagon or the CIA, or both. The charges
have
nothing to do with sexual assault, despite screaming media
headlines. They relate to Assange’s encounters this past
summer with two
Swedish women. Rebutting prosecutor
Ny’s comments in a strongly worded
statement Tuesday,
Mark Stephens, one of Assange’s British lawyers,
explained
that the allegations “do not constitute what any advanced
legal system considers to be rape; as various media outlets
have
reported ‘the basis for the rape charge’ purely seems
to constitute a
post-facto dispute over consensual, but
unprotected sex days after the
event.”The charges against
Assange were, in fact, properly dropped last
August within
24 hours by chief prosecutor Eva Finne, who found there
was no “reason to suspect that he [Assange] had
committed rape.”
However, Assange’s identity had already
been unlawfully disclosed to the
right-wing media by the
Swedish authorities. Stephens asserts, “The so
called ‘rape
’ story was carried around the world and has caused Mr.
Assange and his organization irreparable harm.” CLIP -
More through
The
Persecution of WikiLeaks
WikiLeaks : dans les coulisses de la diplomatie américaine
http://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2010/11/28/
wikileaks-dans-les-coulisses-de-la-diplomatie-americaine_
1446078_3210.html
LOS PAPELES DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTADO
http://www.elpais.com/documentossecretos/.
Pentagon to test 2nd near-space strike craft - Weapon
designed for
urgent threats (November 25, 2010)
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/nov/25
/pentagon
-to-test-2nd-near-space-strike-craft/
Defense Department scientists are set to conduct a second
test launch
next year of the Falcon HTV-2 experimental
superweapon after the first
flight this year ended when the
autopilot deliberately crashed the
unmanned glider into
the ocean as a safety measure.The Falcon Hypersonic
Test Vehicle is designed to skim the top of the atmosphere
just below
space, and is a key element of the Pentagon's
Conventional Prompt Global
Strike (CPGS) capability - a
program to build non-nuclear strategic
weapons that can
strike conventionally anywhere in the world in less
than
an hour. (...) The $308 million Falcon HTV-2 is a suborbital
near-space vehicle launched on a Minotaur rocket, a
solid-fuel booster
built from a decommissioned ballistic
missile. On the very edge of the
atmosphere, in a procedure
called "clamshell payload fairing release,"
the launch
missile deploys the plane, which is then supposed to glide
above the Earth at more than 13,000 miles per hour - more
than 20 times
the speed of sound. The Pentagon is
developing a generation of such
hypersonic weapons as
a way of being able to strike quickly at urgent
threats - such
as preparations by terrorists or rogue states to use
nuclear
weapons. The issue has been lent urgency by the recent
nuclear
arms treaty negotiated with Russia. Specialists
say the new generation
of hypersonic strike craft would
not count against the limits the treaty
places on strategic
weapons, although in treaty negotiations, U.S.
officials
promised to discuss the new weapons in a treaty
consultation
commission. CLIP -
COULD THIS BE USED IN A SURPRISE ATTACK
AGAINST
IRAN'S DEEP UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR
INSTALLATIONS?
"For the first time in history there is agreement that Iran
] is the
threat."
-
Netanyahu
"Wikileaks certainly is an interesting turn of events to say
] the least!
It has lit up the mainstream, the blogstream,
]and alterna-stream by
changing the traditional rules of
] the game quite a bit! A rattlesnake
never bites before it
]rattles its tail to warn its victim. Wikileaks
seems like it is
] being used to rattle to someone!.
- Anonymous comment posted
HERE
on 30 Nov 201O
----
"In fact, this 'revelation' about Iran's capability to threaten
Europe
is even more believable than the 'sexed-up' Iraq
dossier claim, because
this revelation comes from
Wiki-leaks, an honest-to-god whistle blower
organization,
right? I mean, there's just no way that agents working on
behalf of the US and Israeli governments could possibly
use such an
organization to spread propaganda, right?
(...) Is there no one in the
alternative news community that
can see this for what it is? North Korea
supplying missiles
to Iran to attack Europe?! Right when the US and
Israel
are involved in a protracted effort to demonize Iran to the
world
and the US has an aircraft carrier sitting off the
Korean Coast!? Is all
of this meant to be so obvious, or did
my reading of 'psychological
operations for dummies' gift
me with amazing insight into how political
propaganda
really works? In determining the origin of the Wiki-leaks
documents, we need ask ourselves but one question: in
whose interest is
it to put pressure on the US government
through the release of documents
to the press (via
Wiki-leaks) that force the US to do a certain amount
of
damage control, while simultaneously portraying Iran as
the biggest
threat to world peace? Because that, in the
final analysis, is the
overall effect of the Wiki-leaks
documents. Wiki-leaks performs so
poorly in the 'smell
test' that I feel confident in suggesting that the
documents
may not even be original documents; and if they are, they
have
very likely been amended in such a way that they
serve the
Israeli/Zionist agenda."
- Joe Quinn - Taken from
Wiki-Leaks Serves
Israeli Agenda Of Demonizing Iran
below
2.
NOTE from Jean: After I wrote my lengthy intro note to the
previous
article I found this related comment below
expressing several similar
views... A MUST READ!
From:
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/218807
Wiki-Leaks Serves Israeli Agenda Of Demonizing Iran
by - 30 Nov 2010
I obviously missed the momentous occasion when the
mainstream media
turned anti-war. But who can now deny
that it is so when we see
Wiki-leaks and the mainstream
media joining forces to expose the ugly
truth of the US
invasions of Iraq, Afghanistan, and more recently, what
the US state department thinks of world leaders? I mean,
that is what is
happening, right?
Wrong.
What is happening is that Wiki-leaks is being promoted by
the media in
order to sell the same old lies, except that now
the lies are coming
sugar-coated, with a 'whistle-blower'
gloss to better enable digestion.
The lies themselves don't
frustrate me so much anymore, and I can
understand why
the general public are fooled, but I have to admit to
being
disappointed at how effortlessly the Wiki-leaks poison is
being
swallowed by so many supposedly alternative news
sites. Sites like
Counterpunch, Global Research, Citizens
for a Legitimate Government and
Information Clearing
House, to name but a few, are all disseminating the
Wiki-leaks story without so much as a hint of critical
thought it seems.
">From day one, the Wiki-leaks Afghan - and then Iraq -
war logs
revealed little if anything that was not already
publicly available:
That the US uses assassination squads in Iraq and
Afghanistan? Old news.
Seven years ago the Guardian
informed us that not only were US 'hit squads' operating
in Iraq,
but that they were being trained by the Israelis!
And in any case, is
the idea that 'hit squads' are being
used to track down the evil
'Taliban' in Afghanistan more
appalling than the fact, splashed across
American
broadsheets earlier this year, that Obama
signed a bill
authorizing the assassination of American citizens by
the
CIA?
That the US pays the Iraqi and Afghan media for positive
coverage is not
only old news, it's only half the story!
Have we already forgotten the
Lincoln Group and the
precocious Christian Bailey? In 2005 the Lincoln
group
won (was awarded) a $100 Million contract to essentially
control the entire
Iraqi media via its own 'Iraqi'
publications and the monopolization
of the Iraqi
advertising industry on an ongoing basis. All of these
details have been carried in the mainstream press, yet
they have done
nothing to stop the bogus endless 'war
on terrorism'. Why then are we
being encouraged to
expect that the Wikileaks documents, which convey
the
same information, will fare any better? Is it because
these details
will soon be consigned to the memory
hole (again) while other, more
strategically important,
details will be repeated ad nauseum?
That the US has killed thousands of innocent civilians
in Iraq and
Afghanistan? Old news. In fact, on this one,
the Wiki-leaks documents
offered support for the much
lower estimation of deaths in Iraq and
Afghanistan by the
discredited 'Iraq Body Count' rather than the much more
realistic
estimation of almost 1.5 million (in Iraq) by
Just Foreign Policy
But quibbling over the number of dead Muslims is not
important these
days anyway, after all, they're only
Muslims, not real people, and the
over-all exposure by the
mainstream media of US misdeeds in Iraq and
Afghanistan
is, in itself, no bad thing. If Wiki-leaks left it at that,
I would
be more than happy to applaud the mysterious Mr Assange
and the
equally mysterious provenance of his documents.
But the Wiki-leaks
documents tell much more than arbitrary
killing in wars of conquest,
they also provide support for
the continuation and expansion of those
wars, most notably
to Iran and Pakistan.
For example, the Afghan 'war logs' offered 'evidence' that
Pakistan is
helping the Taliban - that's Pakistan, and not,
as
has been reported, the CIA:
Persistent accounts of western forces in Afghanistan using
their
helicopters to ferry Taleban fighters, strongly denied
by the military,
is feeding mistrust of the forces that are
supposed to be bringing order
to the country.
One such tale came from a soldier from the 209th Shahin
Corps of the
Afghan National Army, fighting against the
growing insurgency in Kunduz
province in northern
Afghanistan. Over several months, he had taken part
in
several pitched battles against the armed opposition.
"Just when the police and army managed to surround the
Taleban in a
village of Qala-e-Zaal district, we saw
helicopters land with support
teams," he said. "They
managed to rescue their friends from our
encirclement
, and even to inflict defeat on the Afghan National Army."
The UK Guardian's
summation of the Afghan war logs
was this:
- How a secret "black" unit of special forces hunts down
Taliban leaders
for "kill or capture" without trial.
- How the US covered up evidence that the Taliban have
acquired deadly
surface-to-air missiles.
- How NATO commanders fear neighbouring Pakistan and
Iran are fueling
the insurgency.
- How the Taliban have caused growing carnage with a
massive escalation
of their roadside bombing campaign,
which has killed more than 2,000
civilians to date.
Are these the type of revelations that are going to cause
serious
problems for the US governments? Are they going
to outrage the public?
Having been conditioned for years
to believe that the 'Taliban' are evil
monsters, are people
going to be angry or quietly proud that a 'secret
special
forces unit' is hunting the Taliban down 'without trial'?
Does the 'revelation' that the Taliban acquired surface-to-air
missiles
damage or bolster the US government claim that
they are fighting a war
against a formidable foe in
Afghanistan? Of what significance is it that
the coalition
covered up this alleged 'fact'?
And the data that the Taliban 'massively escalated their
roadside
bombing campaign, killing more than 2,000
civilians'; is this damaging
to the US government, or
'evidence' that the US is fighting the good
fight in
Afghanistan?
The other English paper that ran with the Afghan 'war logs'
was the
NY
Times. Their headline summation told us:
Pakistan Spy Service Aids Insurgents, Reports Assert
The fate of Combat Outpost Keating illustrates many of
the frustrations
of the allied effort: low troop levels,
unreliable Afghan partners and a
growing insurgency.
The military and intelligence reports provide a real-time
history of the
Afghan war from the vantage point of
American troops actually doing the
fighting and
reconstruction.
So, thanks to Wiki-leaks, the unlikely darling of the
]mainstream media,
the world is being informed that the
'enemy' in Afghanistan is growing
stronger, Pakistan and
Iran are to blame, and brave US troops are
engaged in
'reconstruction' there!
But Pakistan and the Taliban are not the main target of
disinformation
in these documents. As more documents
are released, it becomes clear
that, sitting square in the
bulls-eye, is Iran. The initial round of
leaks provided this
sensational 'revelation', reported here by the UK
Telegraph:
Wiki-leaks: how Iran devised new suicide vest for
al-Qaeda to use in
Iraq
Iranian-backed forces supplied insurgents attacking
coalition troops and
devised new forms of suicide vests
for al-Qaeda, according to
assessments released by
Wiki-leaks.
Only in their wildest dreams could the war-mongers in
Washington and Tel
Aviv have wished for a more on-
message leak of 'secret information'.
And so to the latest raft of documents, partially released
just a few
days ago. When I read their contents, to say that
I was shocked would be
to grossly over-state my reaction.
I could have written them myself:
Wiki-leaks: Iran 'obtains North Korea missiles which can
strike Europe'
This one, I have to admit, is entirely believable because, a
fter all,
everyone knows Saddam had the same capability
several years ago,
remember? In fact, this 'revelation' about
Iran's capability to
threaten Europe is even more believable
than the 'sexed-up' Iraq dossier
claim, because this
revelation comes from Wiki-leaks, an honest-to-god
whistle blower organization, right? I mean, there's just no
way that
agents working on behalf of the US and Israeli
governments could
possibly use such an organization to
spread propaganda, right?
Is there no one in the alternative news community that can
see this for
what it is? North Korea supplying missiles to
Iran to attack Europe?!
Right when the US and Israel are
involved in a protracted effort to
demonize Iran to the
world and the US has an aircraft carrier sitting
off the
Korean Coast!? Is all of this meant to be so obvious, or did
my
reading of 'psychological operations for dummies' gift
me with amazing
insight into how political propaganda
really works?
Does anyone truly believe that the fact that someone in the
US State
Department thinks that Sarkozy is an 'Emperor
with no clothes' will do
any real damage? Is this meant to
be a secret? It is certainly no secret
to over 60% of the
French public who, years ago, openly stated as much.
Likewise the 'revelation' about Berlusconi; 'feckless, vain
and
ineffective as a modern European leader'? What about
'senile,
megalomaniac, psychopath, pedophile' this is what
the Italians and most
Europeans are saying, does the US
State Department not read the papers
before compiling
'secret dossiers' on foreign leaders?
And what of the the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il?
He's a 'flabby
old chap' according to these 'damaging
reports'. Is this meant to cause
some kind of diplomatic rift
between North Korea and Washington before
or after the
USA and its client state of South Korea bombs Kim and a
few
million North Koreans back to the stone age? And
Iranian President
Ahmadinejad - 'Hitler'?? Does anyone
expect the Obama government to want
to retract that one or
hide it from the public? More to the point, are
we all
suffering from collective amnesia? Who has repeatedly
referred to
Iran and it's democratically-elected leader as
Nazi Germany and a new
Hitler? Anyone? Ok, here's a hint.
Ok, so I mentioned Israel a couple of times. Why? Here's
one reason,
from the horse's mouth: In Israel the prime
minister, Benjamin
Netanyahu, said that he felt vindicated
by [Wiki-leaks] revelations
about the extent of international
and Arab concern about Iran and its
nuclear programme.
"Israel has not been damaged at all by the WikiLeaks
publications," Netayahu said.
"The documents show many sources backing Israel's
assessments,
particularly of Iran. Our region has been
hostage to a narrative that is
the result of 60 years of
propaganda, which paints Israel as the
greatest threat.
In reality leaders understand that that view is
bankrupt.
For the first time in history there is agreement that Iran
is
the threat," he said.
There is also the fact that it is public knowledge that
Israel operates
an extensive and very well-entrenched
network of spies in
the US, including the infamous
Israeli art students.
In 2005 the FBI noted, for example, that Israel maintains
"an active
program to gather proprietary information
within the United States." A
key Israeli method, said the
FBI report, is computer intrusion.
And what are we to make of the strange coincidence
where, on the very
same day that Wiki-leaks releases
documents that contain key data about
the Iranian
nuclear program, the
Israeli Mossad murders one
Iranian nuclear scientist and injures another
in Tehran?
In determining the origin of the Wiki-leaks documents,
we need ask
ourselves but one question: in whose
interest is it to put pressure on
the US government
through the release of documents to the press (via
Wiki-leaks) that force the US to do a certain amount of
damage control,
while simultaneously portraying Iran
as the biggest threat to world
peace? Because that, in
the final analysis, is the overall effect of the
Wiki-leaks
documents. Wiki-leaks performs so poorly in the 'smell
test'
that I feel confident in suggesting that the
documents may not even be
original documents; and if
they are, they have very likely been amended
in such a
way that they serve the Israeli/Zionist agenda.
---
Related article:
Yossi Melman: Mossad, MI6, the CIA and the case of the
assassinated
scientist (30 November 2010)
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/
yossi-melman-mossad-mi6-the-cia-and-the-case-of-the-
assassinated-scientist-2146995.html
Three events - not seemingly related - took place yesterday.
The leaking
of State Department documents, many of
which deal with the world's
concerns about Iran's nuclear
programme; the mysterious assassination in
Tehran of a
top Iranian nuclear scientist and the wounding of another,
and the appointment of Tamir Pardo as the new head of
Mossad, Israel's
foreign espionage agency. But there's a
link between them. They are part
of the endless efforts by
the Israeli intelligence community, together
with its
Western counterparts including Britain's MI6 and America's
CIA,
to sabotage, delay and if possible, to stop Iran from
reaching its goal
of having its first nuclear bomb. The
attack on the two scientists, one
of them mentioned as a
top nuclear scientist working with Iran's
Ministry of Defence,
was part of these efforts. No organisation claimed
responsibility but it is obvious, not just because of
accusations by
Iranian officials and Iran's media, that
Israel was behind it. Most
experts who follow Middle East
politics and Mossad history would agree.
It is at least the
fourth attempt to assassinate Iranian scientists
linked with
the country's nuclear programme in four years. There
were
probably other attempts which did not hit the
headlines. The attribution
to Mossad is not because of
the use of motorcycles, though in the past
Mossad has
been involved in similar operations. The best known one
was
in 1995 in Valletta, Malta, when a Mossad hit-team
liquidated Dr Fathi
Shkaki, the leader of the Islamic Jihad.
It has more to do with the
policy of Mossad to deal a
blow to Iran's nuclear programme. On top of
assassinating nuclear scientists to terrorise others and
force some to
quit, it is believed that Mossad was also
behind penetrating Iranian
purchasing networks and
selling them flawed equipment of its nuclear
enrichment
centrifuges and most recently by planting a virus which
has
damaged the nuclear computers at Natanz. Yet
despite these daring ploys,
it is obvious to Israeli
decision-makers as well as to western leaders
that if a
country is determined enough to develop nuclear
weapons
nothing would stop it.
3.
From:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/
comidwiki.php
THE COMPLETE IDIOT'S GUIDE TO WIKILEAKS
LATEST DOCUMENT DUMP
Michael Rivero
Wikileaks, following much media fanfare (reason for
suspicion right
there) has just released a huge number
of documents supposedly leaked to
WikiLeaks and no
other websites'. The media is denouncing this as a
threat to the United States while US politicians wring t
heir hands and
wonder when they will be free of the curse
of the First Amendment and
all that troublesome
nonsense about Freedom of Speech. Many observers
think this is a propaganda set up and that neither Julian
Assange or
WikiLaeks should be taken at face value.
After all, Julian Assange keeps
insisting there was no
9-11 conspiracy and the 9-11 truth movement a
"distraction." Apparently Julian Assange has patented
conspiracy and
nobody else may expose one except
himself!
Of course, there is really not that much that is new in
this latest
dump. Like prior WikiLeaks dumps, most of
it is old news mixed with some
rather dubious claims.
In his last such dump, Julian Assange included a
claim
that Osama bin Laden is still alive and controlling Al
Qaeda. Of
course, it is well documented outside the
United States that Osama bin
Laden has been dead for
many years and that Al Qaeda itself is a fake
front group
created to hoax Americans into endless wars of conquest,
much as the fictional Emmanuel Goldstein was used in
George Orwell's
"1984."
In yet another infamous propaganda attempt, WikiLeaks
tried to claim
that weapons of mass destruction had
been found in Iraq, justifying the
invasion. No such
weapons were ever found.
As for the present batch of documents, again it is a
rehash of stories
already known to the blog-o-sphere.
Even those people who did not know
US diplomats spy
on their United Nations counterparts did not find it
surprising or in any way a new idea.
So what is the real purpose of Assange's little charade?
Propaganda.
Propaganda is like rat poison. 95% of it is tasty, healthy
food. But the
purpose is to get you to swallow the
poison. The same is true of the
WikiLeaks document
dump. The bait are all these old stories which we
already knew about, used to convince us that the entire
pile is "tasty,
healthy food," except that it isn't. Buried
in the pile of delicious,
albeit past the expiration date
morsels are the bits of poison which the
US
Government knows you will no longer accept at face
value from the
controlled media, but hope you will eat
if handed to you by a con artist
posing as hostile to the
government.
So, given that 95% of the current WikiLeaks is really old
news, as a
public service I will point out the bits of
poison that Julian hopes you
will eat.
1. Iran is bad so you should all want to kill them.
2. Saudi Arabia is bad because they are funding Al Qaeda
so you should
all want to kill them.
3. North Korea is bad because they gave really long range
missiles to
Iran for Iran to put their nuclear warheads in,
so you should all want
to kill them.
4. China is messing with your computers, so you should
all want to kill
them.
That about sums it up. Oh yes, there is nothing negative
about Israel in
all these diplomatic messages, an
impossibility given the lethal Israeli
attack on the Aid
Flotilla last May. That suggests who Assange really
works
for.
If WikiLeaks were really bad, why doesn't DHS, which did
not hesitate to
takeover dozens of domains this last week
for copyright infringement,
not take over WikiLeaks
domain for "National Security?" Clearly, the US
Government wants you to read the "leaks!"
---
Related articles:
Wikileaks and The Tel Aviv Connection (Nov-29-2010)
http://www.salem-news.com/
articles/november292010/israel-connection-jg.php
(TEMPE, Az.) - What is Tel Aviv to do now that it’s known
Israelis and
pro-Israelis ‘fixed’ the intelligence that
induced the U.S. to war in
Iraq? Fool me once, shame
on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Con me
consistently for six decades and the relationship is over,
as is
Israel’s credibility as a legitimate nation state.Tel
Aviv knows this.
But what can the Zionist state do about
it? Answer: Wikileaks.Why now?
Misdirection. Shine the
spotlight on Washington to take it off Tel Aviv.
That’s
good old-fashioned psy-ops. And challenge the
credibility of the
U.S. That’s Wikileaks. Any credible
forensics would start by asking: to
whose benefit? Then
look to means, motive and opportunity plus the
presence of stable nation-state intelligence inside the
U.S.Tepid
Support will not Suffice - Obama has behaved
as anticipated by those who
produced his presidency.
Anyone surprised at the lack of change in U.S.
policy in
the Middle East fails to grasp the power of the Israel
lobby.Did he hesitate to support their latest Israeli
strategy for
scuttling peace negotiations? Absent peace,
the U.S. will continue to be
the target of those outraged
at America’s unflinching support for
Israel’s thuggish
behavior in pursuit of its expansionist goals.
Confirming
the lobby’s influence, Netanyahu announced he would
not agree
to halt settlements on Palestinian land until
Obama reduced to writing a
$3 billion bribe. In return for
a proposed 90-day freeze, what form of
bribe will
America provide? Twenty F-35 jets at $150 million each
plus
parts, maintenance, training and armaments. (...)
Wikileaks’ release of
confidential diplomatic cables
provides Israel an opportunity to
undermine U.S. relations
worldwide while also inflicting lasting damage
on U.S.
interests in the Middle East. After this, what nation would
trust the U.S. to maintain a confidence? In October,
Turkey asked that
the U.S. not share intelligence with
Israel. Now who dares share
intelligence with the U.S.?
This may signal the beginning of the end for
the Obama
presidency his domestic policy failures are eclipsed by
his
failures in foreign policy.This may also signal
pre-staging for the 2012
presidential primary with a
weakened Obama forced to name Clinton as his
running
mate or stepping aside so she can lead the ballot.Her
2008
presidential campaign promised recognition of
Israel as a “Jewish state”
and promised an “undivided
Jerusalem as the capital.” Tel Aviv was
elated. A second
Clinton presidency would ensure another victory for
Israel—and no peace.
Wikileaks Is Zionist Poison (October 28, 2010)
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=15318
Disinformation is defined as ‘misinformation that is
deliberately
disseminated in order to influence or
confuse rivals.’ It is used by
governments to mislead
and brainwash their citizen populations,
instigate wars,
and blackmail foreign regimes. It is the ultimate
instrument of the media. The most effective
disinformation is that which
is comprised of falsehood
as well as facts. Wikileaks, founded by Julian
Assange,
fits this description perfectly, right down to the letter.
Seemingly overnight, it has become one of the biggest
‘whistle-blowing’
agencies in modern history. In reality
though, it is one of the biggest
disinformation projects
in modern history, and it may be the most
dangerous
because it is masquerading as an organization of truth.
The
information released by Wikileaks isn’t new; it isn’t
groundbreaking; it
doesn’t hurt the US as much as
people think, it’s fractional really; and
it is overloaded
with as much as propaganda as the day-to-day Zionist
media is. This propaganda is benefitting someone. And
that someone is
the illegal usurping entity of Israel. Even
the Israeli government
itself thinks so (1). CLIP
GORDON DUFF: WIKILEAKS, A TOUCH OF ASSANGE
AND THE STENCH OF AIPAC
(November 27, 2010)
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/11/27/gordon-duff-
wikileak-predictions-sticking-my-neck-out-2/
Wikileaks is like a TV show that never gets off the ground.
We started
with a “shoot ‘em up” in Iraq, the helicopter
slaughter soon forgotten
and move on to, well, what? We
got a deluge of material from
Afghanistan, carefully
gleaned to point fingers at Pakistan. When it
came down
to backing any of it up, it went nowhere.Considering the
massive corruption and drug scandals, even the
revelations that
President Karzai has been in negotiations
with pranksters pretending to
be the Taliban, all the really
juicy stuff from Afghanistan must have
been in another
drawer. Then we got Iraq. Ah, Iraq. There, we could
check.
We know the people who wrote the leaked material. They
told us
Wikileaks edited it, altered it, redacted it more than
the Pentagon. The
“Iraq War Log” was, well…phony.
There is one thing that has been
consistent about
Wikileaks and our prediction is that this next batch,
reputed to be millions of highly sensitive documents, will
prove our
point. Wikileaks is Israel. Wikileaks is an
intelligence operation to
weaken and undermine the
American government, orchestrated from Tel
Aviv, using
dozens of operatives, dual citizens, some at the highest
authority levels, spies for Israel. Through leaking
carefully selected
intelligence along with proven falsified
documents, all fed to a
controlled press, fully complicit,
Wikileaks is, in fact, an act of war
against the United
States. -
CHECK ALSO
GORDON DUFF:
“AIPAC ORDERED BUSH TO ATTACK IRAN”
HOW CAN ISRAEL SIFT THROUGH DEFENSE
DOCUMENTS?
This last week, in a lawsuit over an AIPAC, (Israel’s
lobby) employee
reputedly fired for being caught spying
against the US, news stories
across the United States
reported that, as part of that $20 million
civil case,
evidence will be presented that masses of classified
material come to AIPAC and Israel continually. Is AIPAC
Wikileaks? The
only evidence of any massive leak
discovered in the Pentagon is AIPAC.
(...) WHAT WILL BE IN WIKILEAKS?
If dual citizens who make up much of the Pentagon’s
leadership are
working with Israel or AIPAC to formulate
Wikileaks, as seems to be the
case, then the upcoming
leak will serve a pro-Israeli agenda, even if it
damages the
United States, as other Wikileaks have. These are Israeli
agenda items:Discrediting Obama foreign policy in order
to weaken the
president’s influence with congress to push
for a halt on new
settlements in Palestine and the forced
removal of Islamic property
owners. Accusations
involving Turkey, now feuding with Israel over the
killing
of Turkish citizens on the Mavi Marmara, now recognized
as a
purely humanitarian mission. These accusations
against Turkey may
include weapons being supplied to
terrorists in Iraq, a fanciful abuse
of reality. What will not
be reported, if this story is “leaked” either
through
Wikileaks or the other Israeli sources,
“Debka”..”Stratfor”
..”FamilySecurityMatters.org”..or the infamous
“IsraelNationalNews.com” is Israel’s 40 years of
complicity in the very
acts they now accuse Turkey of.
More importantly, is the issue of blaming
Turkey for the
actions of the terrorist group, PKK, long funded by
Israel and now claimed to be allied to Al Qaeda, is vital
to Israel’s
strategy against Turkey.Expect Pakistan to be
hit, as usual. An Islamic
nuclear power with a top rate
million man army that outclasses Israel
hands down,
Pakistan, primary competitor for US aid dollars, a
country
that actually has agreements with the United
States and real troops
fighting alongside Americans,
will get their usual Wikileaks bashing.
WIKILEAKS IS CHICKENFEED MEANT
TO COVER ISRAEL’S TAIL
Is it a coincidence that documents regarding Israel,
their spying,
influence peddling, suspicions of
complicity in terrorism, Yemen, Iraq,
Pakistan,
Somalia, across Europe and even the Detroit bombing,
those
reports are there, they are classified but you will
never see one on
Wikileaks. In fact, they are the only
classified information that never
gets out to the news.
Is that because, as we have learned, the borders
of
Israel extend well into Washington DC, well into the
Pentagon? What
won’t we see in Wikileaks:Nothing in
Wikileaks will accuse anyone, even
Pakistan or
Afghanistan, or complicity in narcotics trafficking nor
mention the huge new narcotics industry operating in
Iraq. Ask yourself
why.One of the biggest areas of
complaint in the Pentagon, more
classified White
Papers have been written on this than anything else:
“How Israel is Endangering the United States“In fact,
the biggest
“classified” debate in America is what
supporting Israel, a nation with
incredible wealth and
utterly obnoxious leaders costs the United States.
Rumors of such issues aren’t rumors at all. When
General Petraeus
presented his now famous power
-point presentation to Admiral Mullen,
Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, outlining how Israel is
undermining American foreign policy, he wasn’
t operating without tens of
thousands of pages of
intelligence behind him. Not one page, not one
word of these studies will be in Wikileaks. CLIP
4.
From:
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/294/056/Is_
the_Internet_9_11_Under_Way.html
Is the Internet 9/11 Under Way?
By Zen Gardner - 4 December 2010
Think about it. Where is this seemingly staged
Wikileaks furor taking
us? While we participate in
digging into the juicy tidbits of
information that
incriminate just about anybody and everybody,
where is
it all going?
Lessons of 9/11
While 9/11 served as a wake up call to those awake and
aware enough to
see the obvious demolitions and
misinformation and resultant "Pearl
Harbor" effect,
most of the world fell for it. And now people are
literally
bending over, as in airport 'screenings', to the
onslaught of
police state fascism worldwide. It's
staggering. In fact, it's
Orwellian. The armies, police
and private sector are at war with the
vague concept of
terrorism - an unbeatable enemy in a war that can be
drawn out indefinitely and fought in any arena
necessary.
And what was the result of this declared war on
terrorism? Not a war on
terror, but an increase in fear
and terror, all to justify the economic,
social and
political clampdown that has followed.
What will the Wikileaks debacle herald?
You guessed it--the last bastion of freedom of
information and
expression, a free Internet, will topple.
After all, if information is
now the enemy, we must
carefully police any and every aspect of this
dangerous
medium--all for the safety and protection of 'we the
people'.
Oh, we'll still have the Internet, just like you can still fly.
You'll
just have to be on the "approved" list, screened,
stamped, zapped,
mugged and molested if you want to
get "on the net". No biggie. Thanks
Julian--job well
done.
Warning Signs
#1. Wikileaks---WAY too approved and publicized.
Every TV and cable
network, press worldwide, official
recognition from every level of
government. Heck, he
even does a TED talk! Where's anyone else trying to
expose the agenda? Only Julian. Hmmm.
#2. Biggie: This supposed system fighter says the 9/11
truth issue is "a
distraction". Mustn't step on your
bosses' toes now, should we Julian..
Very suspicious
if you ask me.
#3. Wikileaks and Assange's sketchy background:
The WikiLeaks website first appeared on the Internet in
December
2006.[15][16] The site claims to have been
"founded by Chinese
dissidents, journalists,
mathematicians and start-up company
technologists,
from the US, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South
Africa".[5] The creators of WikiLeaks have not been
formally
identified.[17] It has been represented in
public since January 2007 by
Julian Assange and
others. Assange describes himself as a member of
WikiLeaks' advisory board.[18] (Wikipedia)
Also, Assange reportedly wrote for both the New York
Times and the
Economist which is fishy as well--not a
real enlightened or
'alternative' mindset. His
mysterious persona also plays well to the
Wikileaks
furtive image so people won't expect to know too
much, which
also is very 'convenient' for keeping
anything hidden.
[NOTE: There doesn't have to be deliberate,
conscious involvement in
some agenda on Wikileaks'
part, but it helps. He, they, could be 'useful
idiots'
whose program has been conveniently co-opted by
the controllers
to serve their purpose. Either way,
look for the pattern and the
effects.]
#4. Watch the hype: There's a growing crescendo of
anger and hate that
is now being whipped up--to the
point that Assange is being called a new
kind of
terrorist--and more disturbingly, and as expected, the
comparison is now being drawn between Assange and
Bin Laden:
Social Media Leaks Categorize Julian Assange As the
Osama Bin Laden Of
The Internet
The founder of WikiLeaks is not only a wanted man by
the American
authorities, his now infamous Web site
WikiLeaks is also under attack by notorious hackers,
while its services
are being cut-off by Amazon and
EveryDNS.net. Although not officially
announced,
Julian Assange might be considered today's public
enemy
number-one, taking the place of the illusive
Osama bin Laden. Not since
9/11 has any one figure
reached such notoriety due to what many consider
acts against a state.
Like bin Laden, Assange has no permanent address,
does not maintain a
headquarters, employs only a
select few confidants and has taken to
hiding in covert
areas. Younger than bin Laden, Assange at 39 years-
old
may be a little more mobile than the 53 year-old,
choosing to hopscotch
the globe versus hibernating
in the mountains of Pakistan and
Afghanistan.
While his face resides on the covers of magazines and
newspapers around
the world, similar to a Wild West
'Wanted' poster, little is known about
his day-to-day
activities. Like bin Laden's video addresses, while the
CIA and other mercenaries are seeking his
where-a-bouts, it's amazing
that he still finds ways to
release updates justifying his actions.
(SOURCE)
Notice also how we've been hearing about Wikileaks'
exploits for a few
years now, giving us time to make
the connection between it and
sensational and
'destructive informational terrorism'. Similarly we
heard about Osama through the Yemen and Nairobi
attacks being attibuted
to him, imprinting his "brand"
on the collective mind which led to the
foregone
phony conclusion that he had masterminded the 9/11
attacks.
Ah, 'But what about these apparent exposures? Would
they attack their
own?'
Could all these serious indictments against their own
just be a
deflecting smokescreen to hide the real
purpose? Sure worked last time.
So why wouldn't
they risk taking down some of their own to give this
psychological operation credibility?
Pentagon strikes 'its own' on 9/11---need I say more?
The Tactic Is Very Familiar - Know Your Enemy
First there's the Hegelian Dialectic - create a problem,
provoke a
reaction and then implement the pre-
planned solution. The staged 9/11
attacks, including
the internationally inhabited World Trade Center,
'justified' the ensuing wars and worldwide clampdown
on freedoms in the
name of 'security', including the
horrendous Patriot Act that was
already written and
just waiting for an excuse to be signed and
implemented.
Similarly, this attack over the international Internet
and drawing in
diplomatic communities worldwide
by exposing state secrets from a
variety of countries
will greatly help usher in international measures
in
the name of 'security', probably spearheaded once
again by the
fascist US government with coinciding
EU, Canadian & Australian
measures. It's already
under way with the Department of Homeland
Security
confiscating websites.
All they need is 'the right incident" to justify bringing
on full
control. Like "Internet Terrorism"? They just
can't use that term enough
now, can they. After all, it's
a war on terror, and "if you're not for
us, you're for the
terrorists." The ultimate false choice, just like
everything else they foist on the human consciousness.
Pretty clever these ol' boys. It's in their blood.
Those manipulating world events belong to a cult, a
brotherhood that
hides behind many names and guises,
and to which they pledge their
absolute loyalty above
everything, even their own flesh and blood.
Commonly
referred to as the Illuminati, this cult has an agenda
they
work to fulfill using certain rituals, methods and
tactics.
One of their central themes and modus operandums is
"Ordo Ab Chao"--
order out of chaos. Create the chaos,
pitting anyone against anyone
while controlling and
fomenting both sides--hence the double headed red
phoenix symbol-- for any reason, even killing or
exposing their own, to
create an illogical madness
that they think only they can see through
and
understand. All the while they are manipulating
world governments,
banks, armies and corporate
leaders and drawing the net on the outcome
they
have already planned.
Fear and confusion is the climate they love to
foment. As long as
there's a confused and
uninformed populace, the ignorant and fearful
masses will be crying out for help from the
'powers that be' - the very
"powers that be" that
caused all the problems in the first place.
They're not out to help, they're out to control. At
any cost, by any
means necessary.
5.
From:
http://mycatbirdseat.com/2010/12/
the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran/
Is Wikileaks being manipulated by an intelligence
service?
By Alan Hart
The Wikileaks revelation that some Persian Gulf Arab
leaders wanted (and
still want?) America to attack Iran
is confirmation of what some of us
thought we knew –
that Arab leaders are not merely impotent but as
dangerously deluded as their Israeli counterparts.
Netanyahu was absolutely correct when he told a
group of editors in Tel
Aviv that “Israel has not been
damaged at all by the Wikileaks
publications.” A
senior Israeli government official went further in his
response to questions from AFP. He said: “We have
come out looking
good.” The leaked documents, he
added, “confirm that the whole Middle
East is terrified
by the prospect of a nuclear Iran… The Arab countries
are pushing the United States towards military action
more forcefully
than Israel.”
Actually the assertion that “the whole Middle East is
terrified by the
prospect of a nuclear Iran” is nonsense.
The Arab regimes which more or
less do the bidding
of America-and-Zionism are terrified, but the same
cannot be said of many of their repressed subjects.
As Noam Chomsky
pointed out in a recent interview
with Open Democracy’s Amy Goodman, a
poll of Arab
opinion indicates that 80% regard Israel as the major
threat in the region. Iran is seen as a threat by only 10%.
The poll
also indicated that 57% believe the region
would be a more safe place if
Iran had nuclear weapons.
(As with Israel/Palestine, the regimes are
effectively on
one side – that of America-and-Israel, and the Arab
masses are on the other side – that of the Palestinians).
The only good news confirmed by the latest Wiki leaked
documents is that
President Obama has so far resisted
pressure from both Israel and the
Arabs. (In fairness it
should not be forgotten that President George
“Dubya”
Bush also said “No” to an attack on Iran when Vice
President
Cheney wanted him to authorize it).
There is no mystery about why any U.S. president who is
not completely
nuts will refuse to authorize an American
attack on Iran (and do his
best to stop Israel going it alone,
no doubt with clearance through
Saudi airspace). An
American attack on Iran would have huge and possibly
incalculable consequences for American interests. It
would set in motion
an escalating and possibly unending
counter offensive including
unbridled terrorism against
American forces and facilities (civilian and
business as
well as military) around the world. And while that was
happening, what is left of the global economy could be
wrecked by
sustained rises in the price of oil.
If those Arab leaders who pressed America to attack Iran
discount the
catastrophe scenario indicated above, they
are very, very irresponsible.
But there is more to their
folly.
I don’t believe Iran’s ruling mullahs want nuclear
weapons, but under
pressure from the Revolutionary
Guards (the real power in the country
when push comes
to shove?), they may have agreed in principle a while
ago that Iran should have at least the possibility of
developing a
nuclear bomb for deterrence.
Prior to the publication of Wiki’s latest leaks, the question
of how far
and how fast Iran should go to have the
possibility of developing a
nuclear bomb was still the
subject of debate in the leadership in all of
its
manifestations. It may be that Wiki’s revelations will play
into the
hands of those in Tehran who are insisting that
Iran must have a nuclear
bomb for deterrence.
While I was absorbing what the Wiki leaks confirmed
about the attitudes
of Arab leaders, I asked myself this
question: What would I want if I
was an Iranian, even
one who hated the present regime?
My answer?
I would want my government, whatever its composition,
to crash ahead
with developing a nuclear bomb for
deterrence. I would tell myself that
was the only way to
keep Iran safe from Arab-backed Israeli threats. And
when challenged in argument, I would say, “Do you think
America and
Britain would have invaded Iraq if Saddam
Hussein had nuclear weapons?”
My main point?
If Iran does become a nuclear-armed state, it will be
because of Israeli
threats and Arab leadership’s
endorsement of them.
Now to a most controversial question, one at least as
controversial as
the various 9/11 conspiracy theories.
Is Wikileaks being manipulated by intelligence services
– one or
several?
There are a number of bloggers – some of them informed
writers with
credibility, some of them uninformed, anti-
Semitic conspiracy theory
nutters – who think the answer
is “Yes”. More to the point is that no
less a figure than
Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter’s National
Security Advisor, thinks the answer could be “Yes”. He
said so in an
interview with PBS’s Judy Woodruff and
also in a subsequent BBC World
Service (Radio)
interview.
To Judy Woodruff he said:
“The real issue is, who is feeding Wikileaks? They’re
getting a lot of
information which seems trivial,
inconsequential, but some of it seems
surprisingly
pointed… The very pointed references to Arab leaders
could
have as their objective undermining their
political credibility at home,
because this kind of
public identification of their hostility towards
Iran
could actually play against them at home…It’s a
question of whether
Wikileaks are being manipulated
by interested parties that want to
either complicate
our relationship with other governments or want to
undermine some governments… I have no doubt that
Wikileaks is getting a
lot of the stuff from sort of
relatively unimportant sources, like the
one that
perhaps is identified on the air. But it may be getting
stuff
at the same time from interested intelligence
parties who want to
manipulate the process and
achieve certain very specific objectives.”
Another way to look at the matter is to ask this
question. If a visitor
from Outer Space studied the
first two days of Wikileak’s revelations,
what
preliminary conclusion would he (or she) come to?
I think it’s entirely possible that he (or she) would
say: “The main
message is clear. Iran is the biggest
single threat to the peace of the
region and the world
and not only because the Israelis say so. Arab
leaders agree with them. The secondary message is
that apart from the
Arab leaders who say they share
Israel’s assessment, other Muslim
leaders, those in
Turkey and Pakistan especially, are not to be
trusted.”
And here’s another question. Which party benefited
most from the first
two days of Wikileaks revelations?
The obvious answer is the Zionist
state of Israel.
I must also confess that I have a nagging worry (small
but real) about
the possibility that Julian Paul Assange,
Wikileaks’ founder, has been
compromised in some
way and is open to manipulation. My concern on this
account is the fact that he is a 9/11 conspiracy denier.
He is firmly on
the record as saying: “I’m constantly
annoyed that people are distracted
by false
conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we
provide evidence
of real conspiracies, for war or mass
financial fraud.”
As I have said on public platforms in America and
written in a number of
articles for the worldwide web,
I think there is irrefutable evidence
that the Twin
Towers were not brought down by the planes and
their
burning fuel.
My own conclusion at the present time is that I don’t
have a conclusion;
but I think the question of
whether or not Wikileaks is being
manipulated, and
if so by whom, is worthy of deep and serious
investigation.
---
Alan Hart is a former ITN and BBC Panorama
foreign correspondent who
covered wars and
conflicts wherever they were taking place in the
world
and specialized in the Middle East. His
Latest book
Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews,
is a three-volume epic in its
American edition. He
blogs on
http://www.alanhart.net and tweets on
http://www.twitter.com/alanauthor.
From:
http://www.t-room.us/2010/12/posted-
wpermission-wayne-madsen-reports-december-
2-2010-u-s-intelligence-retaliates-against-israels-
role-in-wikileakss-disclosures/
U.S. intelligence retaliates against Israel's role in
Wikileaks's
disclosures
Dec 2, 2010
With Israeli officials, including Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu,
continuing their gloating over
the disclosure by Wikileaks of classified
U.S. State
Department cables, the U.S. intelligence community
is taking
off its gloves and is releasing some
embarrassing information about
Netanyahu and a
Mossad attempt to use a divorce involving the
President
of Yemen's family to penetrate the
president's family's inner circle in
a possible
blackmail attempt.
Wikileaks's founder, Julian Assange, singled out
Netanyahu for praise as
a world leader who believes
the embarrassing leaks will aid "global
diplomacy.
" In an interview with Time magazine, Assange said
"Netanyahu
believes that the result of this
publication, which makes the sentiments
of many
privately held beliefs public, are promising a pretty
good . . .
. [and] will lead to some kind of increase in
the peace process in the
Middle East and particularly
in relation to Iran." Assange, who is
believed to be in
the United Kingdom, is the subject of an INTERPOL
arrest warrant for alleged "sex crimes" in Sweden.
Huseyin Celik, the deputy chief of Turkey's governing
Justice and
Development Party (AKP), said that Israel
appeared to have had advance
knowledge of the
contents of the latest release of State Department
cables. Celik said of the leaks: "One should look at
which country is
content. Israel is extremely content."
Turkish Interior Minister Besir Atalay stated from
Ankara that "It seems
to us that the country which is
not mentioned much, especially in the
Middle East, or
which this development seems to favor, is Israel. This
is how we see it in a way when we look in the context
of who is
benefiting and who is being harmed."
WMR previously reported that Wikileaks, or "WikIsrael",
was part of a
Mossad operation having links within the
neocon and Israel Lobby
apparatus of the United States
government. Turkey has reasons to be
suspicious of the
leaks. Various leaked State Department cables
suggested
that Iran was helping Hamas and secretly helping Iran
with its
nuclear program.
The notorious pro-Israeli publisher of The New Republic,
Martin Peretz,
chimed in with a column in his magazine
stating that the leaks from the
U.S. embassy in Ankara
proved that Obama's outreach to the Turkish
government
of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was a "failure."
In fact, many of the leaked cables favoring Israel, hostile
to Russia
and China, or proving very embarrassing to
President Obama appear to
have been written in total or
in part or contain quotes by political
appointee or career
Jewish diplomats with close ties to Israel and its
lobby in
the United States: U.S. ambassadors to Turkey Eric
Edelman and
James Jeffrey; Deputy Secretary of State
James B. Steinberg; U.S.
ambassador to Brazil Clifford
Sobel; U.S. charge d'affaires in Saudi
Arabia Michael
Gfoeller; Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian
Affairs Philip H. Gordon; ambassador-at-large Daniel
Fried; U.S.
ambassador to Canada David Jacobson;
among others.
A source within the U.S. Secret Service, on deep
background and on the
condition of anonymity, informed
WMR that while on a "business trip" to
New York on
November 8, Netanyahu visited a performing arts theater
in
West Greenwich Village. U.S. Secret Service personnel
were required to
accompany Netanyahu to the theater.
The performance involved extreme
sado-masochistic, as
well as homosexual themes, according to our source,
who added, "I almost threw up." Netanyahu was passing
through New York
on his way to New Orleans where he
addressed the general assembly of the
Jewish Federation
of North America.
Another U.S. intelligence source has revealed to WMR that
a well-known
operative for the American-Israel Public
Affairs Committee (AIPAC) on
Capitol Hill is attempting to
blackmail the daughter of Yemeni President
Ali Abdullah
Saleh in a "honey trap" operation. Saleh's daughter, who
is
recently divorced, has reportedly been writing checks
to the AIPAC
operative, which, subsequently, are not
cashed. The un-cashed checks
appear to be part of a
Mossad operation designed to establish a paper
trail that
can later be used to blackmail Saleh through his daughter.
These are likely the first of many retaliatory moves by
intelligence
agencies around the world against Israel. As
one informed source put it,
"Israel overplayed its hand
with these Wikileaks releases, now it will
suffer the '
blowback.'"
---
MADSEN'S personal observation a few days ago:
This from an Italian journalist who has ane excellent
point about
Wikileaks (of course, no Italian paper got
the same scoops as the NYT,
[Gate] Guardian,
LeMonde, or Spiegel):
"Another interesting issue to remark is the (non)role of
the Italian
journalists in the whole story. It is, at least,
odd that a
remote-located website news service, with no
apparent connection with
the country, is able to get
sensitive information about the Italian
government,
while the local journalists - and especially those who
write
about politics - don't."
7.
The following comment posted at
http://mycatbirdseat.com/
2010/12/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-
to-iran/
is in response to
Is Wikileaks a front for the
CIA or Mossad?
BY RICHARD SPENCER IN
THE TELEGRAPH
IS WIKILEAKS A FRONT FOR THE CIA OR MOSSAD? A
JOURNALIST ASKS AND
IMMEDIATELY DISMISSES A
FAIR QUESTION WITH NO GOOD REASON
“All bizarre and nonsensical conspiracy theory of course.”
It is not at all clear why you should say that. The “of
course” only
emphasizes the lack of analytical basis
for your total dismissal.
Especially when one considers that in the end you
yourself suggest a
theme to the material.
“Ultimately, they put the onus on Middle Eastern
countries to explain
themselves. The cables are
America’s own explanations. Neither Iran nor
many
of its Arab friends and
enemies like being held to account
overmuch.”
In our own lifetimes, we have learned of many dark
operations more
impressive than the selected
release of some not-all-that-secret
documents,
many of them having release dates of not too many
years in
the future. The term “conspiracy theory” is
now consistently used to
disparage those who are
genuinely puzzled about the official
explanations of
certain big events.
Yes, we have the paranoid extreme, but that extends
into the mainstream
too, even into politics.
In the end you must judge major news events by the
standards of the late
I.F. Stone. You must read different
versions and explanations and make
comparisons and
weightings. You must judge the purport of the material
itself, what it is intended to say or not say.
We live in a shadow world as never before in human
history with vast
intelligence establishments working
day and night and a press now
reduced to a small
number of owners who have their own reasons for
giving slants to affairs or even completely
misrepresenting them.
Truth is perceived infrequently, but there are immensely
well-financed
establishments busy “getting out the story”
and even creating it in some
cases. To say otherwise is
to admit to extreme naiveté or perhaps
dishonesty.
When was the last time a paper like your Telegraph or
even the New York
Times did some serious investigative
journalism for readers? Especially
where the earth-
s milk
stuff like the abuse of parliamentary expenses.
Almost never.
Where were you with Blair’s countless lies? Bush’s lies
and absurdities?
We lived through a set of events in
which, after the greatest peace
march in history, Blair
managed to twist the truth and lie his way into
doing
something against the overwhelming sense of the
British people.
And the press pretty well let it happen.
We only have a few genuine investigative journalists in
the world, and
they include notably Seymour Hersh and
Robert Fisk. But even their work
must be subject to
evaluation. They can have things planted on them, and
they make mistakes.
The WikiLeaks material is undoubtedly authentic, but
that does not at
all exclude an underlying purpose in
its release.
It is a well-known practice of intelligence agencies to
give large bits
of genuine material, none of it too
of intelligence in return or to “bury” some damaging
deception like a fish hook planted in a minnow.
The CIA used to brag of having a huge house organ
whose keys could be
played to create the sense of a
Bach fugue of seeming news. It was
talking about all
the publications, both compliant and duped, in which
it could plant a story and have it reverberate ultimately
as a
convincing event.
I’m not sure whether WikiLeaks itself falls into the
compliant or duped
category, but the nature of the
material, the main themes plus the many
important
things undoubtedly missing, say something important
to those
listening carefully.
I am completely underwhelmed by the content of the
military WikiLeaks,
both this time and previously.
Very little there that well-informed people did not already
know. Yes,
of course, the juicy tidbits about so-and-so
said are fun, and so they
are meant to be, but they are
not all that informative.
I am sure there are countless lies and atrocities contained
in the
universe covered so far by WikiLeaks, but they are
not in the material
released.
The idea that no one knows where Assange is also strikes
me as slightly
ridiculous in this age of massive
intelligence operations and the
trampling of individual
rights in the name of fighting terror.
If you think otherwise because of Osama bin Laden, you
are rather late
in learning he has been dead since the
bombing of Tora Bora. The United
States has kept him
alive, as it were, for a focus in its insane War on
Terror.
Cui bono?
The US looks like an innocent victim, just guilty of
some unpleasant
gossip here and there. Who wouldn’t
know that? Israel gains support for
an attack on Iran.
The leaks serve Israeli-Pentagon interests.
And do so in a convincing, seemingly disinterested way.
These leaks also serve America’s now cancerously-
swollen intelligence
apparatus in seeking more
repression and secrecy within American
society.
Your off-hand dismissal is unfair and unwarranted.
8.
From:
http://ramallahonline.com/2010/12/wildfires-
and-wikileaks/
Wildfires and Wikileaks
Mazin Qumsiyeh, 4 December 2010
(...)
Wikileaks
The whole world is talking about the Wikileaks leaking
of previously
classified US documents. Now I
personally am skeptical about the
selective leaking of
documents that show only a tiny whiff of scandal
for
Israel. Most US foreign policy communication with
world leaders and
diplomats has been about protecting
Israeli war crimes and strengthening
Israeli positions.
This is known to be true of both public communication
and secret communications (e.g. already declassified
material from the
Truman era). So I would be excused
to be skeptical when 300,000
documents are released
and only few of them deal with Israel. Much of
them
deal with how various actors (especially western
leaning Arab
dictators) dutifully tell their masters in
Washington (themselves
beholden to the Israel-first
lobbyists) that Iran is indeed the new Nazi
Germany
or the new Soviet Union.
There are really two possibilities here
1) That these “leaks” are a form of psy-ops
engineered (selected) to
benefit Israel’s plan of
confronting Iran. See for example
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
article26967.htm
and
http://criminalstate.com/2010/12/wikileaks-–-
more-israeli-game-theory-warfare/
and
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-ruebner/wikileaks
-israels-securit_b_790100.html
2) That they are psy-ops that are calculated by the US
and Israeli
governments to do a small amount of
exposure of sensitive material but a
lot of confusion
among public opinions in the world (in Europe and
Arab
countries) to change the focus from the
disastrously failing policies in
Palestine, Iraq,
Afghanistan, and Pakistan. (I saw such analysis in
Arab
media e.g.
http://hala.ps/ar/index.php?act=Show&id=62180
but little of it in
Western progressive media).
Here is another analysis by Jonathan Cook:
Wikileaks and the New Global
Order
“At work here is a set of global forces that the US, in its
hubris,
believed it could tame and dominate in its own
cynical interests. By the
early 1990s that arrogance
manifested itself in the claim of the “end of
history”: the
world’s problems were about to be solved by US-
sponsored
corporate capitalism. The new Wikileaks
disclosures will help to dent
those assumptions. If
a small group of activists can embarrass the most
powerful nation on earth, the world’s finite resources
and its laws of
nature promise a much harsher lesson.”
http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details
.php?id=16449
I disagree with many aspects of Fisk’s analysis below
but it is witty
and worth reading.
Now We Know. America Really Doesn’t Care
about Injustice in the Middle
East. By Robert Fisk
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/11/30-3
Political fires are raging and spin doctors in
governments are trying
hard to contain the fires
and change the subject but the real solution
for
most of our problems remain obvious to most
people: free Palestine –
end apartheid.
CHECK ALSO:
John Pilger: Wikileaks and The War You Don’t See
(December 3, 2010)
http://coto2.wordpress.com/2010/12/03/john-pilger-
wikileaks-and-the-war-you-dont-see/
Award winning journalist John Pilger speaks on
Australian radio about
the absurdities put forward
by members of the American government. He
has
a new documentary coming out in Britain on
Dec. 12th called “The War
You Don’t See” which
features an interview with Julian Assange. To see
the trailer, go to
http://www.johnpilger.com/videos/the-war-you-
dont-see-trailer
John Pilger "The Invisible Government" (Sept 25, 2007)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-uq7O1RqQQ
The Propaganda Arm Of The Invisible Government
9.
From:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/
world/assange-threatens-to-release-entire-cache-of-
unfiltered-files/article1825922/
WikiLeaks founder threatens to release entire cache of
unfiltered files
DOUG SAUNDERS - Dec. 05, 2010
At the centre of a tightening web of death threats, sex-
crime
accusations and high-level demands for a treason
trial, WikiLeaks
founder Julian Assange threatened to
unleash a "thermonuclear device" of
completely
unexpurgated government files if he is forced to
appear
before authorities.
Mr. Assange, the 39-year-old Australian Internet activist
whose online
document-leaking service has
embarrassed the United States and other
countries by
publishing hundreds of thousands of secret diplomatic
and
military documents, has referred to the huge,
unfiltered document as his
"insurance policy."
The 1.3-gigabyte file, distributed through file-sharing
services this
summer and protected with an
unbreakable 256-bit encryption key,
contains full
versions of all the U.S. documents received by
WikiLeaks
to date - including those that have been
withheld from publication or
have had names and
details removed in order to protect the lives of
spies,
sources and soldiers.
Silent for the better part of a week as WikiLeaks made
daily headlines
around the globe, Mr. Assange has been
increasingly vocal in recent
days, defending his actions,
decrying his critics and defying world
leaders.
Mr. Assange's lawyer Mark Stephens warned that if
Mr. Assange were to be
brought to trial on rape
accusations he faces in Sweden, or for treason
charges
that have been suggested by U.S. politicians, he would
release
the encryption key. The tens of thousands of
people who have downloaded
the file would instantly
have access to the names, addresses and details
contained in the file.
WikiLeaks, Mr. Stephens said, has "been subject to
cyberattacks and
censorship around the world and they
need to protect themselves ... This
is what they believe
to be a thermonuclear device in the information
age."
He uttered that threat as his client was believed to be in
hiding in
Britain, with prominent U.S. and Saudi officials
calling for Mr.
Assange's arrest or death, justice officials
attempting to shut down his
websites in many countries,
and the Swedish justice system seeking him
for
questioning on the sexual-crime allegations.
Mr. Assange has denied the accusation, made by two
women who hosted a
party for him in Stockholm in
August. He has acknowledged having had
consensual
sex with the complainants. Reports say the sex became
non-consensual over disagreements about condom use.
This weekend he refused to respond to a European arrest
warrant issued
by Sweden, and an Interpol alert related to
the accusation. His lawyers
argued that the accusations
amount to a smear campaign and suggested
that U.S.
officials might be behind them.
The Swedish prosecutor took the unusual step of going
before the news
media to say she has received no
pressure or communication of any sort
from international
or political authorities and that the charges are
unrelated
to the leaks scandal.
"This investigation has proceeded perfectly normally
without any
political pressure of any kind," prosecutor
Marianne Ny told the Agence
France-Presse wire service.
"It is completely independent."
A number of high-profile U.S. figures, including
Republicans Sarah Palin
and Newt Gingrich, have called
for the prosecution of Mr. Assange.
"Julian Assange is engaged in warfare," Mr. Gingrich said,
echoing
similar words spoken by Ms. Palin and others
last week. "Information
terrorism, which leads to people
getting killed, is terrorism. And
Julian Assange is engaged
in terrorism. He should be treated as an enemy
combatant
and WikiLeaks should be closed down permanently and
decisively."
However, U.S. charges against Mr. Assange are unlikely:
He is not a U.S.
citizen and, because he did not steal the
documents himself, but only
participated in their
publication, he would likely be protected under
the U.S.
Constitution's free-speech provisions.
The documents were reportedly stolen from a U.S. military
installation
by Bradley Manning, a former private in the U.S.
Army who copied years
of secret Pentagon and State
Department communiqués and passed them to
Mr. Assange,
who in turn brokered deals with worldwide media outlets
to
publish details from them. Those details, despite some
censorship by Mr.
Assange and the publishers, have shaken
relations between the United
States and Gulf countries,
Russia, Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Mr. Manning is already being held in solitary confinement,
and will
likely face treason and espionage charges. This
has not stopped a
growing chorus of U.S. and foreign
figures from pushing for punishment
for Mr. Assange.
U.S. newspapers reported that a team of Justice Department
and Pentagon
investigators is looking into the possibility
of charges against Mr.
Assange under the Espionage Act.
Attorney-General Eric Holder said "this
is not sabre-rattling"
when asked by reporters about the possibility of
charges.
Justice officials in Australia, where Mr. Assange was born,
are
reportedly also looking into a prosecution.
That did not stop more figures from suggesting that Mr.
Assange should
be harmed or killed - a circle that includes
Canadian Tom Flanagan, a
former campaign manager to
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who told a TV
interviewer
last week that Mr. Assange should be assassinated (he later
apologized for the remark).
In an online interview with the Guardian newspaper, Mr.
Assange said Mr.
Flanagan "should be charged with
incitement to commit murder."
He also told reporters Barack Obama and his Secretary of
State, Hillary
Clinton, should resign if they are shown to
have authorized an operation
to spy on United Nations
top officials - one of the many secrets
revealed in the leaked
State Department cables.
"Obama must answer what he knew about this illegal order
and when. If he
refuses to answer or there is evidence he
approved of these actions, he
must resign," the WikiLeaks
founder told the Spanish newspaper El Pais.
He suggested, not for the first time, that he believes his
document
service has had a profound effect on world history:
"I believe
geopolitics will be separated into pre- and post
-Cablegate phases."
Check also:
A who's-who of the WikiLeaks allegations - 25 pictures and
descriptive
captions
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/a-whos-
who-of-the-wikileaks-allegations/article1817540/?
from=1825922
Highlights of what the most recent WikiLeaks documents
claim, and who's
involved
10.
From:
http://original.antiwar.com/roberts/
2010/11/30/who-precisely-is-attacking-the-world/
Who, Precisely, Is Attacking the World?
by Paul Craig Roberts, December 01, 2010
The stuck pigs are squealing. To shift the onus from the
U.S. State
Department, Hillary Clinton paints WikiLeaks’
release of the “diplomatic
cables” as an “attack on the
international community.” To reveal truth
is equivalent,
in the eyes of the U.S. government, to an attack on the
world.
It is WikiLeaks’ fault that all those U.S. diplomats wrote
a quarter of
a million undiplomatic messages about
America’s allies, a.k.a. puppet
states. It is also WikiLeaks
’ fault that a member of the U.S. government
could no
longer stomach the cynical ways in which the U.S.
government
manipulates foreign governments to serve,
not their own people, but
American interests, and
delivered the incriminating evidence to
WikiLeaks.
The U.S. government actually thinks that it was
WikiLeaks’ patriotic
duty to return the evidence and to
identify the leaker. After all, we
mustn’t let the rest of
the world find out what we are up to. They might
stop
believing our lies.
The influential German magazine Der Spiegel writes:
“It is nothing short
of a political meltdown for U.S.
foreign policy.”
This might be more a hope than a reality. The “Soviet
threat” during the
second half of the 20th century
enabled U.S. governments to create
institutions that
subordinated the interests of other countries to those
of the U.S. government. After decades of following U.S.
leadership,
European “leaders” know no other way to
act. Finding out that the boss
badmouths and deceives
them is unlikely to light a spirit of
independence. At
least not until America’s economic collapse becomes
more noticeable.
The question is: how much will the press tell us about
the documents?
Spiegel itself has said that the
magazine is permitting the U.S.
government to censor,
at least in part, what it prints about the leaked
material.
Most likely, this means the public will not learn the
content
of the 4,330 documents that “are so explosive
that they are labeled
‘NOFORN,’” meaning that
foreigners, including presidents, prime
ministers, and
security services that share information with the CIA
are
not permitted to read the documents. Possibly,
also, the content of the
16,652 cables classified as
“secret” will not be revealed to the public.
Most likely the press, considering their readers’
interests, will focus
on gossip and the unflattering
remarks Americans made about their
foreign
counterparts. It will be good for laughs. Also, the
U.S.
government will attempt to focus the media in
ways that advance U.S.
policies.
Indeed, it has already begun. On Nov. 29, National
Public Radio
emphasized that the cables showed that
Iran was isolated even in the
Muslim world, making it
easier for the Israelis and Americans to attack.
The
leaked cables reveal that the president of Egypt, an
American
puppet, hates Iran, and the Saudi Arabian
government has been long
urging the U.S.
government to attack Iran. In other words, Iran is so
dangerous to the world that even its co-religionists
want Iran wiped off
the face of the earth.
NPR presented several nonobjective “Iranian experts”
who denigrated Iran
and its leadership and declared
that the U.S. government, by resisting
its Middle Eastern
allies’ call for bombing Iran, was the moderate in
the
picture. The fact that President George W. Bush declared
Iran to be
a member of “the axis of evil” and threatened
repeatedly to attack Iran
and that President Obama has
continued the threats – Adm. Michael
Mullen, chairman
of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, has just reiterated
that the
U.S. hasn’t taken the attack option off the table – are not
regarded by American “Iran experts” as indications of
anything other
than American moderation.
Somehow it did not come across the NPR newscast that
it is not Iran but
Israel that routinely slaughters civilians
in Lebanon, Gaza, and the
West Bank, and that it is not
Iran but the U.S. and its NATO mercenaries
who slaughter
civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Pakistan.
Iran has not invaded any of its neighbors, but the
Americans are
invading countries halfway around the
globe.
The “Iranian experts” treated the Saudi and Egyptian
rulers’ hatred of
Iran as a vindication of the U.S. and
Israeli governments’ demonization
of Iran. Not a single
“Iranian expert” was capable of pointing out that
the
tyrants who rule Egypt and Saudi Arabia fear Iran
because the
Iranian government represents the interests
of Muslims, and the Saudi
and Egyptian governments
represent the interests of the Americans.
Think what it must feel like to be a tyrant suppressing
the aspirations
of your own people in order to serve the
hegemony of a foreign country,
while a nearby Muslim
government strives to protect its people’s
independence
from foreign hegemony.
Undoubtedly, the tyrants become very anxious. What if
their oppressed
subjects get ideas? Little wonder the
Saudi and Egyptian rulers want the
Americans to
eliminate the independent-minded country that is a bad
example for Egyptian and Saudi subjects.
As long as the dollar has enough value that it can be
used to purchase
foreign governments, information
damaging to the U.S. government is
unlikely to have
much affect. As Alain of Lille said a long time ago,
“Money is all.”
11.
NOTE from Jean: Despite my initial misgivings about
what looks to
me like a sophisticated Psy-Op, several
people nevertheless point out
the fact that Wikileaks is
providing an invaluable service through
revealing the
true face of our governments and I wish to reflect this
viewpoint as well...
BUT BEFORE you get to review what I have from this
other viewpoint, here
is an excerpt from a LONG
comment by David Wilcock - who believes this
is part
of a staged preparation to get full disclosure of ET
presence
and contacts underway
(See
WikiLeaks: new diplomatic cables contain UFO
details, Julian Assange
says):
China's October Surprise III: The Fight for Disclosure
by David Wilcock
(5 December 2010)
http://divinecosmos.com/index.php/start-here/davids-blog/
898-chinasurpriseiii
(...)
My intuitive data has been very, very consistent in telling me
the
"negative elite" will not succeed. Any apparent victory
they may expect
to have is not part of the grander script
this planet is being led
through -- by high-level angelic
beings, for lack of a better
term.During the last three years
I have had at least 200 different
dreams all saying the Old
World Order will be defeated in a very obvious
and dramatic
fashion. These dreams continue right up to the present and
have not changed -- only gotten more intense.I have had
many years of
experience in how accurate this guidance can
be, particularly when you
get 'clusters' of data that all point
in the same direction. The dreams
have always said that
Disclosure won't happen until we see a clear and
spectacular defeat of the Powers that Were on the world
stage first. The
two must work in conjunction.This is
exactly what's happening right now.
Open your eyes and
take a look at what you see.
IS WIKILEAKS NOTHING MORE THAN "CONTROLLED
OPPOSITION? "Some reliable
insider sources, like
TBRNews, were trying to say Wikileaks was all
'controlled
opposition' -- at least as of November 21st
(emphasis
added):
http://tbrnews.org/wordpress/?p=237
Washington, D.C., November 21,
2010: “Although it is
not a matter of public knowledge, the facts
surrounding
the so-called ‘WikiLeaks’ are such that perhaps a little
publicity would do no harm. This concept is a
government disinformation
site, designed to ‘leak’
information to the public that cannot be
published in
the mainline media. The ‘tens of thousands of vital
messages’ dealing with Afghanistan have been tailor-
made to give Obama
the excuse to exit from
Afghanistan.Unfortunately, the Republican gains
in the
House have made this policy null and void. The new
Republicans do
not want to stop war, they want even
more -- and so Obama’s plans to get
out have been
scrapped. The earlier WikiLeaks stories were all
low-level, not important to U.S. national security and,
aside from the
Administration, of interest only to
inane bloggers and their readers...
The CIA loves to
use people like Julian the Apostate because if they get
caught, Langley always looks the other way and
murmurs, ‘Julian who?’
WIKILEAKS IS THE BLOOD IN THE WATER
The problem with this argument is
that if you start a war,
you can end up getting shot. If you start a
wildfire, your
house could burn down. If this is 'controlled
opposition,'
then whoever started it has absolutely nothing to lose by
potentially disemboweling the entire national security
state. These were
the Drudge headlines from Monday,
November 29th... and they did not
sound good for the
Powers that Were. It's a veritable orgy of 'bad
news',
as far as they are concerned -- the "most embarrassing,
damaging
disclosure in decades": Wikileaks is the
blood in the water that turns
ordinary people into
hungry sharks when they're already pissed off about
the economy. Many disgruntled insiders now have a
democratic,
unregulated way to create more leaks --
or make their own alternative
wiki sites if they can't
get through to Assange.If someone at the top
did
officially sanction Wikileaks, it's the political
equivalent -- at
least for the Powers that Were -- of
playing a hot-potato game with
nuclear fuel rods.
The news system isn't even designed to be able to
handle this much information at once. It typically
grabs two or three
stories in politics, entertainment,
sports, business, comedy, local, et
cetera and that's
basically what you get. CLIP
AND HERE IS ALSO A REQUEST BY LONG-TIME
ERN SUBSCRIBER ILYES
(ilyes@earthlink.net) WHO
WOULD LIKE EVERYONE TO KEEP THIS SITUATION
IN
MIND DURING OUR MEDITATIONS TO HELP...
"all the people of the world
a/w/a JulianAssange and
WikiLeaks, who DO understand what's going on and
also need to be held in The Light, considering the
indeed dangerous and
most urgent conflict on our
planet right now ... this is, for sure, the
'Armageddon
battle' between the forces of Light and Dark, the ones
(most
esp the US) who insist their dominion of
almost all of the world's govts
MUST prevail, using
their long-held and well-developed tool of Secrecy
... I've given up on PrezObama, he's simply another
pawn who declines to
muster any inner strength he
might have behind his alleged convictions
... There's
a critical battle now in progress between the US
(SecrecyControlAll) Govt and ALL the people of the
world who are
determined to birth the New World
which MUST manifest if we're to
continue as a
species, as a viable planet ... the battleground is
WikiLeaks (ie, 'everywhere') ... I know there are
many of us 'out here'
who 'get' the importance of
what's developing ... If one has doubts, one
simply
need take in the herculean efforts the US is making
to silence
WikiLeaks, reaching out and 'touching'
all the sovereigns, for starters,
and arm-twisting
them to take certain steps -- eg: according to their
lawyers, no Australian laws have been broken by
Assange, yet there's an
indication that Oz' govt has
been told to cancel his passport; also note
Pakistan's response below; amazon.com was
ordered to pull WikiLeaks'
servers (which they'd
been hosting), and amazon caved; even Pravda
has
criticized the US, mocking it for these ongoing
violations of its 'free
speech' veneer] ..."
Utterly surreal: Pravda justifiably criticising US for
trying to stifle
a free press... How times change!
From:
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/
03-12-2010/116041-valerie_plame_wikileaks-0/
Valerie Plame, YES! Wikileaks, NO!
03.12.2010
In my recent article Ward Churchill:
The Lie Lives On
(Pravda.Ru,
11/29/2010), I discussed the following
realities about America's legal
"system": it is
duplicitous and corrupt; it will go to any extremes to
insulate from prosecution, and in many cases civil
liability, persons
whose crimes facilitate this duplicity
and corruption; it has abdicated
its responsibility to
serve as a "check-and-balance" against the other
two
branches of government, and has instead been
transformed into a
weapon exploited by the wealthy,
the corporations, and the politically
connected to
defend their criminality, conceal their corruption and
promote their economic interests; and, finally, that
the oft-quoted
adage "Nobody is above the law" is
a lie.
Some critics were quick to dismiss my article as
politically motivated
hyperbole. But with the recent
revelations disclosed by Wikileaks, it
appears that
this article did not even scratch the surface, because
it
is now evident that Barack Obama, who entered the
White House with
optimistic messages of change and
hope, is just as complicit in, and
manipulative of, the
legal "system's" duplicity and corruption as was
his
predecessor George W. Bush.
For example, as I stated in the aforementioned article,
the Obama
administration has refused to prosecute
former Attorney General John
Ashcroft for abusing the
"material witness" statute; refused to
prosecute
Ashcroft's successor (and suspected perjurer) Alberto
Gonzales
for his role in the politically motivated
firing of nine federal
prosecutors; refused to prosecute
Justice Department authors of the now
infamous
"torture memos," like John Yoo and Jay Bybee; and,
more
recently, refused to prosecute former CIA
official Jose Rodriquez Jr.
for destroying tapes that
purportedly showed CIA agents torturing
detainees.
Predictably, the official mantra supporting these
refusals is that
"exhaustive" investigations had been
conducted. But now, thanks to
Wikileaks, the world
has been enlightened to the fact that the Obama
administration not only refused to prosecute these
individuals itself,
it also exerted pressure on the
governments of Germany and Spain not to
prosecute,
or even indict, any of the torturers or war criminals
from
the Bush dictatorship.
This revelation invariably leads to three inescapable
conclusions: these
so-called "exhaustive
investigations" were a sham; the Obama
administration never intended to prosecute such
crimes and, in fact,
went to inordinate lengths to
cover them up; and the American government
has
the proven capacity to influence the legal systems
of other
countries.
And now, given the fact that Wikileaks founder Julian
Assange is facing
criminal charges in Sweden, it is
also evident that America even has the
Swedish
government and Interpol in its hip pocket.
Of course, I do not know if Assange committed the
crime he is accused
of. I do know that to the
American legal "system" the truth is
irrelevant. The
minute Assange revealed the extent of America's
criminality and cover-ups to the world, he became
a marked man. And
America is going to do
anything it can to silence him.
Already we see the treacherous Joe Lieberman, the
man who almost
single-handedly killed the "public
option" in the health care reform
bill so insurance
companies can continue to enjoy record profits,
intimidate an American server into discontinuing
its transmission of
Wikileaks.
And we see many right-wing commentators
demanding that Assange be hunted
down, with some
even calling for his murder, on the grounds that he
may
have endangered lives by releasing confidential
government documents.
Yet, for the right-wing, this apparently was not a
concern when the late
columnist Robert Novak
"outed" CIA agent Valerie Plame after her husband
Joseph Wilson authored an OP-ED piece in The New
York Times criticizing
the motivations for waging
war against Iraq. Even though there was
evidence of
involvement within the highest echelons of the Bush
dictatorship, only one person, Lewis "Scooter" Libby,
was indicted and
convicted of "outing" Plame to
Novak. And, despite the fact that this
"outing"
potentially endangered the lives of Plame's overseas
contacts,
Bush commuted Libby's thirty-month
prison sentence, calling it
"excessive."
Why the disparity? The answer is simple: The Plame
"outing" served the
interests of the military-industrial
complex and helped to conceal the
Bush
dictatorship's lies, tortures and war crimes, while
Wikileaks not
only exposed such evils, but also
revealed how Obama's administration,
and Obama
himself, are little more than "snake oil" merchants
pontificating about government accountability while
undermining it at
every turn.
Of course, I realize that analogizing the Plame case to
Wikileaks is
imperfect, and I certainly do not support
the release of documents that
could endanger any lives.
But it should be remembered that threats to
murder
Assange are just as reprehensible. In addition, they
may serve to
dissuade future whistleblowers from
raising legitimate concerns about
government
corruption and criminality.
And I should also note that while I avidly support the
prosecution of
those who lied, tortured and
committed war crimes during the Bush
dictatorship,
I certainly do not, unlike some critics of Assange,
advocate or support any violence against them, or
against any human
being, regardless of his or her
politics.
Now there is talk of charging Assange under America's
so-called
"espionage" statutes. But American history
has shown how these statutes
have been incessantly
used to conceal government criminality.
When the United States Constitution was being created,
a conflict
emerged between delegates who wanted a
strong federal government (the
Federalists) and those
who wanted a weak federal government (the
anti-
Federalists).
Although the Federalists won the day, one of the most
distinguished
anti-Federalists, George Mason, refused
to sign the new Constitution,
sacrificing in the
process, some historians say, a revered place
amongst
America's founding fathers.
Two of Mason's concerns were that the Constitution
did not contain a
Bill of Rights, and that the
presidential pardon powers would allow
corrupt
presidents to pardon people who had committed
crimes on
presidential orders.
Mason's concerns about the abuse of the pardon
powers were eventually
proven right when Gerald
Ford pardoned Richard Nixon, when Ronald Reagan
pardoned FBI agents convicted of authorizing illegal
break-ins, and when
George H.W. Bush pardoned six
individuals involved in the Iran-Contra
Affair.
Mason was also proven right after the Federalists
realized that the
States would not ratify the
Constitution unless a Bill of Rights was
added. But
this was done begrudgingly, as demonstrated by
America's
second president, Federalist John Adams,
who essentially destroyed the
right to freedom of
speech via the Alien and Sedition Acts, which made
it a crime to say, write or publish anything critical
of the United
States government.
Years later, Adams' precedent would resurface during
the presidency of
Woodrow Wilson, this time via the
Espionage and Sedition Acts. Although
these laws
were designed to prohibit criticism of America's
involvement
in World War One, mainstream religious
leaders who criticized the war
were rarely prosecuted,
but persons and political organizations
considered to
be "radical," like Socialist leader Eugene Debs and
members of the Industrial Workers of the World labor
union (IWW), were
imprisoned and their organizations
decimated.
The McCarthy era of the 1950s brought forth the full
power of the Smith
Act, which was allegedly created
to punish communists who advocated the
violent
overthrow of the United States government, but was
ultimately
used to blacklist and, in many cases,
economically destroy members of
the political left.
During the 1960s and 70s, after the courts diluted
much of the power of
the Sedition laws, government
tactics used to "neutralize" persons and
political
organizations became more covert. Some, like
actress Jean
Seberg, had false rumors circulated
about them in an attempt to destroy
their careers.
(Seberg ultimately committed suicide as a result
of one
of these rumors). Others, like Elmer
"Geronimo" Pratt, were framed and
imprisoned for
crimes they did not commit. And still others, like
Chicago Black Panther leaders Fred Hampton and
Mark Clark, were murdered
outright.
The ironic thing about these so-called "espionage"
acts is that they
actually invert the concepts of crime
and punishment. Most criminals
break laws that
others have created, and people who assist in
exposing
or apprehending them are usually lauded
as heroes. But with the
"espionage" acts, the
criminals themselves have actually created laws to
conceal their crimes, and exploit these laws to
penalize people who
expose them.
The problem with America's system of government
is that it has become
too easy, and too convenient,
to simply stamp "classified" on documents
that
reveal acts of government corruption, cover-up,
mendacity and
malfeasance, or to withhold them
"in the interest of national security."
Given this web
of secrecy, is it any wonder why so many
Americans are
still skeptical about the "official"
versions of the John F. Kennedy or
Martin Luther
King Jr. assassinations, or the events surrounding
the
attacks of September 11, 2001?
In the past, whenever I wrote about the evils of the
Bush dictatorship,
I often quoted a question folk
singer Phil Ochs rhetorically asked
during a 1968
concert in Vancouver, Canada: "What can you do
when you're
a helpless soul, a helpless piece of flesh,
amid all this cruel, cruel
machinery and terrible,
heartless men?"
Ochs subsequently committed suicide in 1976, and
while I am uncertain
that this was the correct path to
take, I can certainly understand his
frustration.
Although the election of Barack Obama gave rise to
the
"outrage" expressed by the so-called "tea party"
movement, if there is
any political group in America
that has a right to be outraged, it is
the Progressives.
They bought into Obama's message of change and
hope,
believed that the criminals of the Bush
dictatorship would have to
answer for their crimes,
and naively dreamed that America's respect for
peace,
justice and human rights would be restored.
But, as Wikileaks and the antics of Obama's "Justice"
Department have
shown, the Progressives were
deceived. Yet, as in the past, they are
forced to be
supportive of Obama's duplicity because the
alternative is
worse.
I want to believe that the Wikileaks documents will
change America for
the better. But what undoubtedly
will happen is a repetition of the
past: those who
expose government crimes and cover-ups will be
prosecuted or branded as criminals; new laws will
be passed to silence
dissent; new Liebermans will
arise to intimidate the
corporate-controlled media;
and new ways will be found to conceal the
truth.
What Wikileaks has done is make people understand
why so many Americans
are politically apathetic and
content to lose themselves in one or more
of the
addictions American culture offers, be it drugs,
alcohol, the
Internet, video games, celebrity gossip,
text-messaging-in essence
anything that serves to
divert attention from the harshness of reality.
After all, the evils committed by those in power can
be suffocating, and
the sense of powerlessness that
erupts from being aware of these evils
can be
paralyzing, especially when accentuated by the
knowledge that
government evildoers almost always
get away with their crimes. The
prevalence of such
evils can shatter faith in goodness and sometimes
even in God. They can transform virtues like honesty,
compassion, and
hope into vices and make those
who cling to them suffer in poverty,
depression and
sorrow.
So shame on Barack Obama, Eric Holder, and all
those who spew platitudes
about integrity, justice
and accountability while allowing war criminals
and
torturers to walk freely upon the earth. And shame
on Germany and
Spain, and all those other guilty
countries, for allowing their sense of
justice to be
distorted by a nation that doesn't seem to know the
meaning of the word.
And damn the right-wing outrage over the Wikileaks
revelations. It is
the American people who should be
outraged that its government has
transformed a
nation with a reputation for freedom, justice,
tolerance
and respect for human rights into a
backwater that revels in its
criminality, cover-ups,
injustices and hypocrisies.
So savor the Wikileaks documents while you can,
because soon they'll be
gone. And for the
government criminals of the world, and for those
who
protect them, it will again be business as usual.
David R. Hoffman - Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
---
AMONG THE MANY COMMENTS THERE...
"This article is spot on. As an American, I am appalled
at the actions
of my country and government
regarding Wikileaks. As a citizen of the
world, I am
furious that other governments would cooperate in
such a
focused and obvious attempt to squash
freedom of speech and the freedoms
of the press,
some of our most important values as Americans.
I'm no fan
of propaganda from any side of the fence.
From a purely objective
viewpoint, anyone who
believes in the US Constitution, must be in
support of
Wikileaks, simply because the first amendment
guarantees the
right to free speech. I have heard the
arguments about how this is
comparable to the
famous exception of yelling "fire" in a crowded
theater,
but really this is not remotely the same thing. I am a
citizen
of the United States, and as such, I have a right
to know what my
government is doing in my name,
and my government has a duty to inform
me. We
will no longer tolerate being lied to, or frightened over
imaginary threats in order that we concede even more
power into the
hands of a corrupt government. These
documents were leaked by an
American, and as a
soldier, PFC. Manningr is sworn to defend the
Constitution of the US. I believe that he was doing
exactly that when he
decided that the world needed
to see these documents."
"The Americans accuse gestapo and kgb of spying
their own people - at
the same time they spy every
man alive on the planet!!they accuse
nationalists of
labour camps - in the meantime a god knows what
happens
in Guantanamo and all the other secret cia
camps around the world. They
accuse nationalist
Germany and Ussr for no freedom of press,
suppressed
opinion and sh** like that - while they
close down websites, they (most
likely) accuse
people (like Assange) with no evidence, they set
ransom
for people's head, they shoot and kill
reporters and children,they use
chemical and
biological weapons,they used atomic bombs, they
create
guerrillas to overthrow governments and then
they call them
terrorists,etc..they try to transform
the meaning of "global peace" so
that anyone who
doesn't shut up and do what America wants is
branded a
terrorist. I'm not suprised by Hillary.
Reinhard Gehlen was the man they
employed back
in the old days to set up their spying network which
works
the same way today."
MUCH MORE THOROUGH...
WikiLeaks news roundup
http://twitter.com/wikileaks
WikiLeaks now available at
http://wikileaks.de/
http://wikileaks.fi/
http://wikileaks.nl/
LOTS of mirror sites of wikileaks! IT IS OUT THERE
AND CANNOT BE DELETED
FROM THE WEB NOW!!
http://typewith.me/wikileaks
Live Q&A with Julian Assange
http://j.mp/fBx8hs
Julian Assange: Why the world needs WikiLeaks
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/julian_assange
_why_the_world_needs_wikileaks.html/a>
TIME's Julian Assange Interview: Full Transcript/Audio
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2034040-
2,00.html
RS: How would you characterize your actions, both in
this latest set of
leaks as well as in the past? Would you
say you're practicing civil
disobedience against breaking
the law in order to expose greater
law-breaking? Is that
the moral calculus that you use to justify the
leaks?
JA: No, not at all. This organization practices civil
obedience, that
is, we are an organization that tries to
make the world more civil and
act against abusive
organizations that are pushing it in the opposite
direction. As for the law, we have now in our four-year
history had over
100 legal attacks of various kinds
and have been victorious in all of
those matters. So if
you want to talk about the law, it's very important
to r
emember the law is not what, not simply what,
powerful people would
want others to believe it is.
The law is not what a general says it is.
The law is not
what Hillary Clinton says it is. The law is not what a
bank says it is. The law, rather, is what the Supr
eme
Court in [the]
land in the end says it is, and the
Supreme Court in the case of the
United States has
an enviable Constitution on which to base its
decisions. And that Constitution comes out of a
revolutionary movement
and has a Bill of Rights
appraised by James Madison and others that
includes a nuanced understanding for the
balancing of power of [the]
states in relation to
the government. CLIP
NO SECRETS: Julian Assange’s mission for total
transparency.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/
06/07/100607fa
_fact_khatchadourian?currentPage=1
(...) Assange is an international trafficker, of sorts.
He and his
colleagues collect documents and
imagery that governments and other
institutions
regard as confidential and publish them on a Web
site
called WikiLeaks.org. Since it went online, three
and a half years ago,
the site has published an
extensive catalogue of secret material,
ranging from
the Standard Operating Procedures at Camp Delta,
in
Guantánamo Bay, and the “Climategate” e-mails
from the University of
East Anglia, in England, to the
contents of Sarah Palin’s private Yahoo
account. The
catalogue is especially remarkable because WikiLeaks
is not
quite an organization; it is better described as
a media insurgency. It
has no paid staff, no copiers,
no desks, no office. Assange does not
even have a
home. He travels from country to country, staying
with
supporters, or friends of friends—as he once put
it to me, “I’m living
in airports these days.” He is the
operation’s prime mover, and it is
fair to say that
WikiLeaks exists wherever he does. At the same time,
hundreds of volunteers from around the world help
maintain the Web
site’s complicated infrastructure;
many participate in small ways, and
between three
and five people dedicate themselves to it full time.
Key
members are known only by initials—M, for
instance—even deep within
WikiLeaks, where
communications are conducted by encrypted online
chat
services. The secretiveness stems from the
belief that a populist
intelligence operation with
virtually no resources, designed to
publicize
information that powerful institutions do not want
public,
will have serious adversaries. CLIP
KEEP US STRONG - Help Wikileak keep
governments open
http://213.251.145.96/
WikiLeaks is a non-profit media organization
dedicated to bringing
important news and
information to the public. We provide an
innovative,
secure and anonymous way for
independent sources around the world to
leak
information to our journalists. We publish
material of ethical,
political and historical
significance while keeping the identity of our
sources anonymous, thus providing a universal
way for the revealing of
suppressed and censored
injustices. WikiLeaks relies on its supporters
in
order to stay strong. Please keep us at the
forefront of
anti-censorship and support
us today.
You can also
read more about WikiLeaks, our
mission and objectives.
Library of Congress Is Latest Government
Institution to Block Wikileaks
http://gawker.com/5705492/library-of-congress
-is-latest-government-institution-to-block-wikileaks
The Library of Congress has blocked access to the
Wikileaks site on its
staff computers and on the
wireless network that visitors use, two
sources tell
TPM.The error message reportedly reads:Ad or
Website
blocked by LC DNSBH. Advertisements
or websites that may be malicious
are blocked.If
this message appears in lieu of an advertisement
(i.e.,
on part of the page), the advertisement site
may be malicious. However
the website is safe to
use.If this message appears on a page by itself,
the website is blocked due to potential malicious
content. More
information - LC IT Security - A
spokesman for the library could not
immediately
comment, but expects to have a statement shortly.
The
library is a governmental institution and
serves as the research arm for
Congress. It was
established in 1800 and, when it was burned down
by the
British in 1814, Thomas Jefferson donated
his own personal library to
replace it. (Not for free,
though; Congress paid $23,950 for the books.)
It
has grown ever since and, according to the library,
it has "more than
144 million items including more
than 33 million cataloged books and
other print
materials in 460 languages; more than 63 million
manuscripts; the largest rare book collection in
North America; and the
world's largest collection
of legal materials, films, maps, sheet music
and
sound recordings."The State and Commerce
departments have also
reportedly told their
employees not to look at the Wikileaks cables,
while the
Department of Education reportedly
blocked it entirely. - CHECK ALSO
U.S. Military in
Iraq Tries to Intimidate Soldiers Into Not Reading
Wikileaks
WikiLeaks cables condemn Russia as 'mafia state'
(1 December 2010)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/0
1/wikileaks-cables-russia-mafia-kleptocracy
Kremlin relies on criminals and rewards them
with political patronage,
while top officials collect
bribes 'like a personal taxation system'
Is Wikileaks Really the Enemy? (Nov 29, 2010)
http://www.philipbrennan.net/2010/11/29/is-
wikileaks-really-the-enemy/
Editor's Note: I am of the opinion that WikiLeaks
mean well but they are
not too careful with double
checking the validity of their sources. Many
of us
believe that WikiLeaks are being used by AIPAC
to further the
agenda of the Industrial Military
Complex by discrediting the
foundations of the US
Government, which will allow President Obama to
rule by Executive Order in the new year...Robert
LeJeune: As I watched
Morning Joe with Joe
Scarborough, I came to wonder exactly why it is
we
are starting to view Wikileaks as the enemy,
and not the U.S Government
itself! All you really
have to do is scan over the cables and war logs,
and the real enemy becomes clear! I find it very
disturbing that Mr.
Scarbourough can sit there
and condemn a PFC and Wikileaks for releasing
the information, yet does nothing to indicate the
guilt of the United
States Administration for the
content of the release. When you step back
and
actually start to review the information in the
cables and war logs,
those whom are our leaders
should be the ones under the gun. Once
reviewed,
we find that the current, and prior administration,
are the
ones whom have continued to lie to the
American people and the world, as
to their actions
in these illegal wars. We find that there have been
over 100 thousand civilian deaths in the ongoing
wars, not the 20 or 30
thousand we were told in
press releases and statements given by both
administrations. Without the PFC and Wikileaks,
it may have been decades
before the American
people were told the truth as to what was done in
their name, if we would have ever been told the
truth at all! I just
wonder the actual number of
civilian deaths in Viet Nam, in light of the
fact that
our government has demonstrated a willingness
to openly lie to
us. CLIP
Don’t Abandon Julian Assange Now by Steve
Beckow (Dec 5, 2010)
http://stevebeckow.com/2010/12/05/dont-abandon
-julian-assange-now/
The latest attack on Julian Assange has come
from lightworker Jane
Burgermeister. (1)
Numerous attacks are coming from various
quarters,
many of them lightworkers.The current
attack suggests that the Economist
gave Assange
an award in 2008 and the Economist is owned by
the
Rothschilds. It also suggests that Amnesty
International gave Assange an
award and AI is
alleged to have a connection to the UN and IMF.
(...)
The effect of Julian’s and Wikileaks’
disclosure is to make it more
difficult for an i
llegal war to be waged in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The
effect of the lightworker suggestions that
Julian is a tool of the cabal
is to nullify the impact
of that disclosure.You have to decide whether
you’re going to abandon Julian now and watch the
cabal survive the
frontal assault that Julian’s
efforts represent or take the risk of
possibly making
a bad decision but have the full impact of Wikileaks’
disclosure stand.Never mind the personalities
involved. The Wikileaks
disclosure is our best shot
at tying the cabal in knots. Abandon Julian
Assange
now and we will lose that tool in our toolbox. (...)
Don’t let
it play upon your desire to be honest and
moral by feeding you
information that makes it
seem as if Julian is compromised – sex
scandals,
awards received, connections, whatever. Even if
they are true,
which I don’t think they are, the time
to deal with that will be later.
Now is the time to
stand firm. CLIP
U.N. Special Rapporteur Juan Méndez: Instead of
Focusing on Assange,
U.S. Should Address
WikiLeaks’ Disclosures of Torture
(December 02,
2010)
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/2/un
_special_rapporteur_juan_mendez_instead
One of the leaked U.S. State Department cables
released by WikiLeaks
urges diplomats to gather
intelligence about "plans and intentions of
member
states or UN Special Rapporteurs to press for
resolutions or
investigations into US
counterterrorism strategies and treatment of
detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan or Guantanamo.
" We speak to Juan Méndez,
the new U.N. Special
Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman
and
Degrading Treatment or Punishment. He has
called on the United States to
investigate and
prosecute torture committed under former
President
George W. Bush. He also said he hopes
to visit Iraq and Guantánamo Bay
to probe
widespread torture allegations. Méndez says, "We
seem to be
focusing on whether disclosing these
cables ... merits some kinds of
action against Julian
Assange... I’m very concerned about the documents
that show that literally thousands of people were
first imprisoned by
American forces and then
transferred to the control of forces in Iraq
and
perhaps even in Afghanistan, where they knew that
these people were
going to be tortured."
Is WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange a Hero?
Glenn Greenwald Debates Steven
Aftergood of
Secrecy News (December 03, 2010)
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/3/is_
wikileaks_julian_assange_a_hero
WikiLeaks is coming under attack from all sides.
The U.S. government and
embassies around the
world are criticizing the whistleblowing group for
releasing a massive trove of secret State
Department cables. The
WikiLeaks website is
struggling to stay online just days after Amazon
pulled the site from its servers following political
pressure. The U.S.
State Department has blocked
all its employees from accessing the site
and is
warning all government employees not to read the
cables, even at
home. "These attacks will not stop
our mission, but should be setting
off alarm bells
about the rule of law in the United States," said
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. We host a
debate between Steven
Aftergood, a transparency
advocate who has become a leading critic of
WikiLeaks, and Glenn Greenwald, a constitutional
law attorney and legal
blogger for Salon.com
L'hébergement de WikiLeaks en France menacé
(03.12.10)
http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2010/
12/03/eric-besson-demande-que-le-site-wikileaks-ne
-soit-plus-heberge-en-france_1448661_651865.html
Eric Besson et les services de l'Etat peuvent-ils faire
interdire
l'hébergement de WikiLeaks par la société
roubaisienne OVH ? "C'est au
juge d'en décider",
répond en substance Octave Klaba, fondateur d'OVH,
dans un message sur le forum de sa société. Il
annonce également qu'OVH
va saisir le juge des
référés "afin qu'il se prononce sur la légalité ou
pas
de ce site sur le territoire français (...) compte tenu
de pressions
qui commencent réellement à se faire
sentir, même à Roubaix Valley".
(...) OVH n'héberge
pas la totalité des serveurs de WikiLeaks. D'après
ZDNet, ces derniers se partageraient entre la France,
la Suède et les
Etats-Unis. Plus précisément, la
société suédoise Bahnhof a confirmé à
ZDNet
qu'elle hébergeait deux serveurs de WikiLeaks.
"Nous leur
fournissons uniquement des ressources
et n'avons aucun contrôle sur leur
contenu ou la
façon dont ils gèrent leur trafic", a précisé la
porte
-parole de l'hébergeur. Toujours selon le site
spécialisé, Bahnhof
héberge la page
Collateralmurder.com, qui contient la vidéo d'un
hélicoptère de l'armée américaine tirant sur des civils
irakiens.OVH
héberge, quant à lui, les pages
WikiLeaks.ch et Cablegate.wikileaks.org,
qui
contient les fameux câbles diplomatiques. Les
pages des War Logs
(carnets de guerre) d'Irak et
d'Afghanistan seraient hébergées aux
Etats-Unis
par le Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
selon
ZDNet, qui n'a pas encore pu avoir
confirmation officielle de la
part de celui-ci. Les
pages en question sont actuellement sous le
coup
d'une cyber-attaque. En parallèle, des
groupes d'internautes à travers
le monde se
sont mobilisés pour héberger sur leurs propres
serveurs des
"sites-miroirs" de WikiLeaks,
c'est-à-dire la copie exacte du site original.
Plusieurs de ces
initiatives proviennent de
France, comme pour le miroir
Wikileaks.fdn.fr.
CLIP
12.
From:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfre
e/cifamerica/2010/dec/06/western-democracies-
must-live-with-leaks
Live with the WikiLeakable world or shut down
the net. It's your choice
Western political elites obfuscate, lie and bluster
– and when the veil
of secrecy is lifted, they try
to kill the messenger
John Naughton - 6 December 201
'Never waste a good crisis" used to be the
catchphrase of the Obama team
in the runup to
the presidential election. In that spirit, let us see
what we can learn from official reactions to the
WikiLeaks revelations.
The most obvious lesson is that it represents the
first really sustained
confrontation between the
established order and the culture of the
internet.
There have been skirmishes before, but this is the
real thing.
And as the backlash unfolds – first with deniable
attacks on internet
service providers hosting
WikiLeaks, later with companies like Amazon
and
eBay and PayPal suddenly "discovering" that their
terms and
conditions preclude them from offering
services to WikiLeaks, and then
with the US
government attempting to intimidate Columbia
students
posting updates about WikiLeaks on
Facebook – the intolerance of the old
order is
emerging from the rosy mist in which it has
hitherto been
obscured. The response has been
vicious, co-ordinated and potentially
comprehensive, and it contains hard lessons for
everyone who cares about
democracy and about
the future of the net.
There is a delicious irony in the fact that it is now
the so-called
liberal democracies that are
clamouring to shut WikiLeaks down.
Consider, for instance, how the views of the US
administration have
changed in just a year. On 21
January, secretary of state Hillary
Clinton made a
landmark speech about internet freedom, in
Washington DC,
which many people welcomed and
most interpreted as a rebuke to China for
its alleged
cyberattack on Google. "Information has never been
so free,"
declared Clinton. "Even in authoritarian
countries, information networks
are helping people
discover new facts and making governments more
accountable."
She went on to relate how, during his visit to China
in November 2009,
Barack Obama had "defended the
right of people to freely access
information, and said
that the more freely information flows the
stronger
societies become. He spoke about how access to
information
helps citizens to hold their governments
accountable, generates new
ideas, and encourages
creativity." Given what we now know, that Clinton
speech reads like a satirical masterpiece.
One thing that might explain the official hysteria
about the revelations
is the way they expose how
political elites in western democracies have
been
deceiving their electorates.
The leaks make it abundantly clear not just that the
US-Anglo-European
adventure in Afghanistan is
doomed but, more important, that the
American,
British and other Nato governments privately admit
that too.
The problem is that they cannot face their electorates
– who also happen
to be the taxpayers funding this
folly – and tell them this. The leaked
dispatches from
the US ambassador to Afghanistan provide vivid
confirmation that the Karzai regime is as corrupt and
incompetent as the
South Vietnamese regime in
Saigon was when the US was propping it up in
the
1970s. And they also make it clear that the US is as
much a captive
of that regime as it was in Vietnam.
The WikiLeaks revelations expose the extent to
which the US and its
allies see no real prospect of
turning Afghanistan into a viable state,
let alone a
functioning democracy. They show that there is no
light at
the end of this tunnel. But the political
establishments in Washington,
London and
Brussels cannot bring themselves to admit this.
Afghanistan is, in that sense, a quagmire in the same
way that Vietnam
was. The only differences are that
the war is now being fought by
non-conscripted
troops and we are not carpet-bombing civilians.
The attack of WikiLeaks also ought to be a wake-up
call for anyone who
has rosy fantasies about whose
side cloud computing providers are on.
These are
firms like Google, Flickr, Facebook, Myspace and
Amazon which
host your blog or store your data on
their servers somewhere on the
internet, or which
enable you to rent "virtual" computers – again
located somewhere on the net. The terms and
conditions under which they
provide both "free" and
paid-for services will always give them grounds
for
dropping your content if they deem it in their interests
to do so.
The moral is that you should not put your
faith in cloud computing – one
day it will rain on your
parade.
Look at the case of Amazon, which dropped
WikiLeaks from its Elastic
Compute Cloud the
moment the going got rough. It seems that Joe
Lieberman, a US senator who suffers from a
terminal case of hubris,
harassed the company over
the matter. Later Lieberman declared grandly
that
he would be "asking Amazon about the extent of its
relationship
with WikiLeaks and what it and other
web service providers will do in
the future to ensure
that their services are not used to distribute
stolen,
classified information". This led the New Yorker's
Amy Davidson
to ask whether "Lieberman feels that
he, or any senator, can call in the
company running
the New Yorker's printing presses when we are
preparing
a story that includes leaked classified
material, and tell it to stop
us".
What WikiLeaks is really exposing is the extent to
which the western
democratic system has been
hollowed out. In the last decade its
political elites
have been shown to be incompetent (Ireland, the
US and
UK in not regulating banks); corrupt (all
governments in relation to the
arms trade); or
recklessly militaristic (the US and UK in Iraq). And
yet
nowhere have they been called to account in
any effective way. Instead
they have obfuscated,
lied or blustered their way through. And when,
finally, the veil of secrecy is lifted, their reflex
reaction is to kill
the messenger.
As Simon Jenkins put it recently in the Guardian,
"Disclosure is messy
and tests moral and legal
boundaries. It is often irresponsible and
usually
embarrassing. But it is all that is left when
regulation does
nothing, politicians are cowed,
lawyers fall silent and audit is
polluted.
Accountability can only default to disclosure."
What we are
hearing from the enraged officialdom
of our democracies is mostly the
petulant
screaming of emperors whose clothes have been
shredded by the
net.
Which brings us back to the larger significance of
this controversy. The
political elites of western
democracies have discovered that the
internet can
be a thorn not just in the side of authoritarian
regimes,
but in their sides too. It has been comical
watching them and their
agencies stomp about the
net like maddened, half-blind giants trying to
whack
a mole. It has been deeply worrying to watch terrified
internet
companies – with the exception of Twitter,
so far – bending to their
will.
But politicians now face an agonising dilemma. The
old, mole-whacking
approach won't work. WikiLeaks
does not depend only on web technology.
Thousands of copies of those secret cables – and
probably of much else
besides – are out there,
distributed by peer-to-peer technologies like
Bit
Torrent. Our rulers have a choice to make: either
they learn to live
in a WikiLeakable world, with all
that implies in terms of their future
behaviour; or
they shut down the internet. Over to them.
13.
From:
http://www.naturalnews.com/030647_
Wikileaks_net_neutrality.html">http://www.
naturalnews.com/030647_Wikileaks_net_
neutrality.html
Net neutrality, the FCC, Wikileaks and the future
of internet freedom
(NaturalNews) Regardless of what you think about
the Wikileaks release
of state secrets, there's no
debating the astonishing fact that the
internet made
these leaks possible. Without the internet, no single
organization such as Wikileaks would have been
able to so widely
propagate secret government
information and make it public. In the old
model of
information distribution -- centralized mainstream
media
newspapers and news broadcasts -- such
information would have been
tightly controlled
thanks to government pressure.
But the Internet allows individual information
publishers to bypass the
censorship of government.
In the case of Wikileaks, it allowed an
Australian
citizen to embarrass the U.S. government while
sitting at a
laptop computer in the United Kingdom.
Governments don't like to be embarrassed. They
don't like their secrets
aired on the Internet. Sure, it's
okay for governments to tap all ofyour
secrets by
monitoring your phone calls, emails and web
browsing habits,
but every government seeks to
protect its own secrets at practically any
cost. That's
why the upshot of this Wikileaks release may be that
governments will now start to look for new ways to
censor and control
the internet in order to prevent
such information leaks from happening
in the
future.
What governments around the world are suddenly
beginning to realize is
thata free internet is ultimately
incompatible with government secrets,
and secrets
are essential to any government that wants to remain
in
power. That's because, as even Noam Chomsky
stated in this DemocracyNow
video interview (http://www.democracynow.org/2010/11/30/noam_
chomsky_wikileaks_cables_reveal_profound),
most
government secrets are based on information
governments wouldn't
want their people to discover
-- secrets that might threaten the
legitimacy of
government if the people found out the truth.
How the FCC plans to seize authority over the
internet
As part of a long-term plan to control content on
the internet, the
FCC is now attempting to assert
authority over the internet in the
same way it has
long exercised content censorship authority over
broadcast television and radio.
The reason you can't say those seven dirty words
on broadcast
television, in other words, is because
the FCC controls broadcast
television content and
can simply revoke the broadcast licenses of any
television station that refuses to comply. This is the
same tactic, in
the internet world, of yanking a web
site's domain name, which the
Department of
Homeland Security has already begun doing over
the last
several weeks (http://www.naturalnews.com/
030542_censorship_internet.html).
The FCC also controls content on the radio and can
yank the broadcast
licenses of any radio stations
that refuse to comply with its content
censorship.
This is why operators of "pirate radio stations" are
dealt
with so harshly: For the government to allow
any radio station to
operate outside its censorship
and control is to invite dissent.
The internet, of course, has been operating freely
and without any real
government censorship for
roughly two decades. In that time, it has
grown to
be what is arguably the most influential medium in
the world
for information distribution. Most
importantly, the internet is the
medium of
information freedom that is not controlled by any
government.
The U.S. government wants to change all that, and
they've dispatched the
FCC to reign in the
"freedoms" of the internet.
How to crush internet Free Speech
The first step to the FCC's crushing of internet
freedom is to assert
authority over the internet
by claiming to run the show. The FCC, of
course,
has no legal authority over the internet. It was only
granted
authority in 1934 over broadcast
communications in the electromagnetic
spectrum
-- you know, radio waves and antennas, that kind
of thing.
There is nothing in the Communications Act of
1934 that grants the FCC
any authority over the
internet because obviously the internet didn't
exist
then, and it would have been impossible for
lawmakers in the
1930's to imagine the internet as
it operates today.
So instead of following the law, the FCC is trying
to "fake" its way
into false authority over the
internet by claiming authority in the
current "net
neutrality" debate. By asserting its authority with
net
neutrality, the FCC will establish a beachhead
of implied authority from
which it can begin to
control and censor the internet.
This is why "net neutrality" is a threat to internet
freedom. It's not
because of anything to do with
net neutrality itself, but rather with
the FCC's big
power grab in its assertion that it has authority
over
websites just like it has authority over
broadcast radio.
The FCC may soon tell you what you can post on
the internet
Where is this all heading? Once the FCC
establishes a foothold on the
'net, it can then
assert that it has the power to tell you what to
post
on the internet. Here's how it might unfold:
First, the FCC will simply ban what it calls
"information traitors,"
which will include people
like Julian Assange (Wikileaks) who publish
state
secrets. (Technically Julian Assange can't be a
traitor since he's
not even American in the first
place, but don't expect the FCC to care
about this
distinction.)
Once the public is comfortable with that, the FCC
will advance its
agenda to include "information
terrorists" which will include anything
posted about
Ron Paul, the federal reserve and the counterfeit
money
supply, G. Edward Griffin, or anything from
true U.S. patriots who
defend the Constitution. The
anti-state website www.LewRockwell.com
(where
some of my own articles have appeared from time
to time) would
also be immediately banned because
its information is so dangerous to
government
control.
After that censorship is in place, the FCC will likely
begin to push the
corporate agenda by banning
websites that harm the profits of large
corporations.
This will include, of course, websites like
NaturalNews.com which teach people about health
freedom, nutritional
cures, natural remedies and
alternatives to Big Pharma's high-profit
pharmaceuticals.
The way this will come about is that the FCC may
require a license to
publish health information on the
web, in much the same way that states
currently
license doctors to practice medicine. This is how
conventional
medicine has operated its monopoly
for so long, by the way: By
controlling the licensing
of doctors at the state level. Any doctor who
dares
prescribe nutritional supplements or suggest that
medication might
be harmful to a patient
immediately gets stripped of his license to
practice
medicine (and thereby put out of business). The
FCC will likely
do the same thing across the
internet. Sites that publish health
information
without a license will be deemed "a threat to
public health"
and be seized by the government.
The first target? Anti-vaccine websites. Vaccines
are so crucial to the
continuation of disease and
medical enslavement in America that any site
questioning the current vaccine mythology will
be deemed a threat to
public health -- or perhaps
even a "terrorism" organization.
Essentially, once the FCC has gained power and
authority over the
internet, it will use that power to
push a Big Government / Big Business
agenda that
censors the truth, keeps people trapped in a
system of
disinformation, and silences anyone
who challenges the status quo.
The FCC is poised to become the FDA of internet
information, banning
alternative speech and
enforcing an information monopoly engineered by
powerful corporations.
Think of the FCC as the new the Ministry of Truth
from George Orwell's
novel 1984
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Truth).
This is not about net neutrality, it's about the FCC
power grab
Remember, I am not arguing here for or against the
principle of net
neutrality itself, but rather warning
about the FCC's imposition of
false authority over
the internet in the first place. The idea of net
neutrality has merits, but granting the FCC the power
to control the
internet is a disastrously bad idea that
will only end in censorship and
"information tyranny"
-- especially now that governments around the
world
are witnessing the "dangers" of information freedom
via the
Wikileaks fiasco.
If there's one thing governments hate, it's real
freedom. Sure, they all
talk about freedom and
publicly claim their allegiance to it, but behind
the
scenes what they really want is total information
control. That's
because freedom gives people the
ability to say what they want, to
whomever they
want, and even to oppose the doctrine of the
government.
Just look at China and how it has censored the
internet to the point
where you can't even log in to
Facebook from that country.
Governments hate freedom because freedom
threatens centralized power and
control over the
People. And because governments hate freedom,
they also
hate the internet as long as it's free. This
is why bloggers and
internet journalists are right
now imprisoned all over the world for
merely
posting the truth
(http://www.cpj.org/imprisoned/cpjs-2008-census
-online-journalists-now-jailed-mor.php).
As Noam Chomsky said in his DemocracyNow
interview (link above), what
the recent Wikileaks
releases really show is that the U.S. government
has "a profound hatred for democracy."
It also happens to have a profound hatred for
actual freedom, because
people who are free to
think for themselves and write whatever they want
are always going to be a threat to a government
that wants people to
conform, obey and acquiesce.
All government agencies seek to expand their
power
What do the FCC, FDA, TSA, DEA, FTC and USDA
all have in common?
They all want more power. They want more
authority, bigger budgets and
more control over
the world around them. They are like cancer tumors,
growing in size and toxicity while they consume
more and more by
stealing resources from a
healthy host. The bigger these cancer tumors
become, the more dangerous they become to the
health of the host body,
and the more urgently they
need to be held in check or excised from the
body
entirely.
There is no such thing as a government agency that
wants to be smaller,
with shrinking budgets and fewer
employees on the taxpayer payroll.
Government
departments -- just like people -- incessantly
seek more
power even at the expense of freedom
among those they claim to serve.
And this move by
the FCC to assume control over the internet is one
of
the most dangerous power grabs yet witnessed
in the short history of the
information age.
CLIP
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/avenging-
wikileaks-anonymous-hackers-takes-mastercard-site/
"ALL-OUT CYBER WAR" ERUPTS OVER WIKILEAKS!
/ 'ANONYMOUS' HACKERS TAKE
MASTERCARD,
VISA OFFLINE AFTER THEY TAKE WIKILEAKS
FINANCIALLY OFFLINE!
/ NOW CALLED BY MANY AS THE "WORLD's FIRST
INFO WAR!" OPERATED BY A
GLOBAL CONSORTIUM OF HACKERS KNOWN AS
"Operation PAYBACK!" –
By Stephen C. Webster, Raw Story, Thursday,
December 9, 2010, 12:47 a.m.
THIRD UPDATE: 'Operation Payback' targets
Visa.com, site goes down in
minutes!
'Anonymous' hackers flexed their muscle again
Wednesday, orchestrating a
successful denial of
service attack against Visa, the largest credit
card provider in the world.
A Twitter account connected to the hackers
declared the start of theattacks and the site was
unavailable less than 16 minutes later.
The attack was allegedly orchestrated as an act of
vengeance over Visa's
decision to cut off
electronic donations to secrets outlet WikiLeaks.
WikiLeaks said Wednesday that its payments
processor, Iceland-based
DataCell, planned to
sue Visa and MasterCard for terminating
payments to
the site.
SECOND UPDATE: Cables show Obama admin
lobbied Russia on behalf of
MasterCard, Visa
UPDATE: MasterCard confirms service
interruption for cardholders
MasterCard
Worldwide confirmed on Wednesday morning
that the "MasterCard
Directory Server" had gone
down and that cardholders were experiencing
service interruptions.
The revelation was made as a massive denial of
service attack was staged
against MasterCard,
ostensibly for refusing further payments to secrets
outlet WikiLeaks.
"Please be advised that MasterCard SecureCode
Support has detected a
service disruption to the
MasterCard Directory Server," MasterCard said.
"The Directory Server service has been failed over
to a secondary site
however customers may still
be experiencing intermittent connectivity
issues.
More information on the estimated time of recovery
will be shared in due
course." MasterCard
transactions appeared to be proceeding as normal
later in the day.
An earlier report follows ...
Sites for Visa, PayPal, Sen. Lieberman also
targeted....
Yesterday, MasterCard Worldwide became the
latest financial institution
to face the wrath of
online hackers acting to avenge secrets outlet
WikiLeaks over the credit card provider's
declaration that the site was
engaged in "illegal"
activities.
Not 36 hours after MasterCard froze payments
to WikiLeaks, their Web
site was down as hackers
with the group "Anonymous" launched a new
wave
of cyberattacks.
The company said its customers could still use
their credit cards for
purchases, but the PayPoint
retail network told a BBC reporter that
MasterCard's "SecureCode" service had been
taken down, interrupting
service all over.
The hackers also claimed responsibility for
taking down the Web site for
Swiss bank
PostFinance, after it froze an account with over
$31,000 set
aside for site founder Julian Assange's
legal defense. Assange wasarrested in London
yesterday on an Interpol warrant out of Sweden,
wherehe's wanted for questioning in an
investigation of sexual
assault.
"Anonymous" has dubbed their cyber warfare
campaign "Operation Payback,"
threatening to
"fire" on any entity that attempts to censor
WikiLeaks.Service to mastercard.com was
unavailable at time of this writing. TheWeb site
for the Swedish prosecutor's office was also offline,
as was asite for the lawyer representing Assange's
accusers.
SECURE COMPUTING Magazine called what's
happening "an all-out cyber
war," noting that
massive botnets were attacking each other by
mid-Wednesday morning as even the
'Anonymous' group had come under fire
from
another group of hackers that sought to defend
U.S. interests.
That group, which was successful in taking
WikiLeaks offline in late
November, was also
thought to be behind attacks on the 'Anonymous'
Web
site, anonops.net, which was still online at
time of this writing.
A "botnet" is Internet slang for a massive shadow
network of computers
that have been unknowingly
hijacked by malicious software. They are
typically
used for nefarious purposes, such as distributed
denial of
service attacks.
Credit card processor Visa also suspended
payments to WikiLeaks on
Tuesday morning, but
its website was functional at time of this story's
publication. It too was expected to come under
denial of service
attacks.
"Operation PAYBACK" also promised to attack
PayPal, the online payment
service that last week
cut off WikiLeaks and froze over $60,000 in
electronic donations, but their site was still online
Wednesday morning.
Topics trending on Twitter suggested an attack
may also target the
micro-blogging site.
Others to suffer downtime this week include
PayPal's blog, EveryDNS --
the domain name
service provider that pulled WikiLeaks off it's .org
address -- and Sen. Joe Lieberman's (I-CT) .gov
Web site. Lieberman's
staff was responsible for
prompting Amazon.com to take WikiLeaks off its
U.S.-based cloud servers.
Researchers with Panda Security have been
tracking the wave of attacks,
blow-for-blow.
In recent days, the online to-do over WikiLeaks
has been called the
world's "first serious
infowar" and a "war for control of the Internet."
"What is this all about? And what does it have
to do with censorship and
Operation Payback?"
'Anonymous' asks on their Web site.
"While we don't have much of an affiliation with
WikiLeaks, we fight for
the same reasons. We
want transparency and we counter censorship.
The
attempts to silence WikiLeaks are long strides
closer to a world where
we can not say what we
think and are unable to express our opinions and
ideas.
"We can NOT let this happen. This is why our
intention is to find out
who is responsible for this
failed attempt at censorship. This is why we
intend to utilize our resources to raise awareness,
attack those against
and support those who are
helping lead our world to freedom and
democracy."
Raw Story will continue following the latest
developments.
------------------------------------------
RELATED LINK ON YOUTUBE:
OPERATION PAYBACK: ANONYMOUS MESSAGE
ABOUT ACTA LAWS, INTERNET
CENSORSHIP and COPYRIGHT!
Watch video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZNDV4hGUGw
"Operation PAYBACK" (is a bitch), this is the
Internet, we run this. An
open message from
Anonymous to the governments of the world and
their
legal leeches regarding the motivation of the
cyber protests.
Corrupt governments of the world, we are
anonymous. For some time now,
voices have been
crying out in unison against the new ACTA laws.
The
gross inadequacies of the new laws being
passed internationally have
been pointed out
repeatedly. Our chief complaint is that such
measures
would restrict people's access to the
internet.
In these modern times access to the internet is
fast becoming a basichuman right. Just like any
other basic human right, we believe that it is wrong
to infringe upon it. To threaten to cut people off
from the
global consciousness as you have is
criminal and abhorrent. To move to
censor content
on the internet based on your own prejudice is at best
laughably impossible, at worst, morally reprehensible.
The unjust restrictions you impose on us will meet
with disaster and
only strengthen our resolve to
disobey and rebel against your tyranny.
Such actions
taken against you, and those you out source your
malignant
litigation too, are inevitable, unavoidable and
unstoppable.
We Are ANONYMOUS,
We Are Legion And Divided By ZERO.
We Do NOT Forgive Internet Censorship
And We Do NOT Forget Free Speech.
We Are Over 9,000,
Expect Us!
------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2010 / The Raw Story
SUBSCRIPTION TO
THE EARTH RAINBOW NETWORK E-LIST
If you are not yet a subcriber to the
Earth Rainbow Network emailing
list
and would like to subscribe to its
automated listserver and
regularly
receive similar compilations covering
a broad range of
subjects, including
each new Meditation Focus issued on
a regular basis,
simply send a blank
email at
earthrainbownetwork-
subscribe@lists.riseup.net from the
email
account to which you want to
receive the material compiled and
networked
by the Earth Rainbow
Network Coordinator. Subscription
is FREE!
Subject: INTERNET DOMAIN SEIZURE OUTRAGE!
Neo-Fascist U.S. Government
Seizes BitTorrent Search Engine Domain and
Tons More in The
Continuing Rise of The
AMERIKAN 4th REICH!
http://torrentfreak.com/u-s-government-seizes
-bittorrent-search-engine-domain-and-more-101126/
NOTE: Scroll DOWN to END to view two (2)
supporting IMAGES!
INTERNET DOMAIN SEIZURE OUTRAGE! /
NEO-FASCIST U.S. GOVERNMENT SEIZES
BitTorrent SEARCH ENGINE and TONS MORE IN
THE CONTINUING RISE
OF THE AMERIKAN 4th
REICH ALL DONE IN THE NAME OF "NATIONAL
SECURITY!" -
Written by Enigmax on Saturday,
November 27, 2010
Following on the heels of this week’s domain
seizure of a large hiphopfile-sharing links forum,
it’s clear today that the U.S. Government has
been very busy. Without any need for COICA,
ICE has just seized the
domain
of a BitTorrent
meta-search engine along with those belonging
to other
music
linking sites and several others
which appear to be connected to
physical
counterfeit goods.
While complex, it’s still possible for U.S.
authorities and copyright
groups
to point at a
fully-fledged BitTorrent site with a tracker and
say
“that’s aninfringing site.” When one looks
at a site which hosts torrents but
operates
no tracker, the finger pointing becomes quite
a bit more difficult.
When a site has no tracker, carries no torrents,
lists no copyright
worksunless someone
searches for them and responds just like
Google, accusingit of infringement becomes
somewhat of a minefield – unless you’re ICE
HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS that is.
This morning, visitors to the Torrent-Finder.com
site are greeted with
an ominous graphic which
indicates that ICE have seized the site’s
domain.
The message below is posted on the seized sites
SEIZED SERVERS
“My domain has been seized without any
previous complaint or notice from
any
court!” the exasperated owner of Torrent-
Finder told TorrentFreak this
morning.
“I firstly had DNS downtime. While I was
contacting GoDaddy I noticed
the DNS
had changed. Godaddy had no idea what was
going on and until now they do
not
understand the situation and they say it was
totally from ICANN,” he
explained.
Aside from the fact that domains are being
seized seemingly at will,
there is
a very
serious problem with the action against
Torrent-Finder. Not only
does
the site not
host or even link to any torrents whatsoever,
it actually
onlyreturns searches through
embedded iframes which display other sites
that
arenot under the control of the Torrent-
Finder owner.
Torrent-Finder remains operational through
another URL,
Torrent-Finder.info,so feel free
to check it out for yourself. The layouts of the
sites it
searches
are clearly visible in the
results shown.
Yesterday we reported that the domain of
hiphop site RapGodFathers had
been seized
and today we can reveal that they are not on their
own. Two other
music
sites in the same field –
OnSmash.com and DaJaz1.com – have fallen to
the same
fate. But ICE activities don’t end there.
Several other domains also appear to have been
seized including
2009jerseys.com,
nfljerseysupply.com,
throwbackguy.com,
cartoon77.com,
lifetimereplicas.com,
handbag9.com,
handbagcom.com
dvdprostore.com.
All seized sites point to the same message.
Domain seizures coming under the much
debated ‘censorship bill’ COICA?
Who needs it?
FLASH UPDATE: Below is an longer list of
domains that were apparently
seized. Most of the sites relate to
counterfeit goods. We assume that
the authorities had a proper warrant for
these sites (as they had for
RapGodFathers yesterday), but were
unable to confirm this.
2009jerseys.com
51607.com
amoyhy.com
b2corder.com
bishoe.com
borntrade.com
borntrade.net
boxedtvseries.com
boxset4less.com
boxsetseries.com
burberryoutletshop.com
cartoon77.com
cheapscarfshop.com
coachoutletfactory.com
dajaz1.com
discountscarvesonsale.com
dvdcollectionsale.com
dvdcollects.com
dvdorderonline.com
dvdprostore.com
dvdscollection.com
dvdsetcollection.com
dvdsetsonline.com
dvdsuperdeal.com
eluxury-outlet.com
getdvdset.com
gofactoryoutlet.com
golfstaring.com
golfwholesale18.com
handbag9.com
handbagcom.com
handbagspop.com
icqshoes.com
ipodnanouk.com
jersey-china.com
jerseyclubhouse.com
jordansbox.com
lifetimereplicas.com
louis-vuitton-outlet-store.com
lv-outlets.com
lv-outlets.net
lv-outletstore.com
massnike.com
merrytimberland.com
mycollects.com
mydreamwatches.com
mygolfwholesale.com
newstylerolex.com
nfljerseysupply.com
nibdvd.com
odvdo.com
oebags.com
onsmash.com
overbestmall.com
rapgodfathers.com
realtimberland.com
rmx4u.com
scarfonlineshop.com
scarfviponsale.com
shawls-store.com
silkscarf-shop.com
silkscarfonsale.com
skyergolf.com
sohob2b.com
sohob2c.com
storeofeast.com
stuff-trade.com
sunglasses-mall.com
sunogolf.com
tbl-sports.com
throwbackguy.com
tiesonsale.com
timberlandlike.com
topabuy.com
torrent-finder.com
usaburberryscarf.com
usaoutlets.net
EDITORS LAST NOTE: WERE YOU AWARE THAT
OSWALD WAS CONSIDERED A HERO BEFORE HE
WAS CALLED A PATSY AFTER
KENNEDY'S
ASSASSINATION IN 1963? IF NOT YOU ARE
BEHIND THE TIMES!
WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN
TOLD THAT A LONG TIME AGO.
KENNEDY DATABASE ON THIS SITE
POLITICS DATABASE ON THIS SITE
DEMOCRAT DATABASE ON THIS SITE
REPUBLICAN DATABASE ON THIS SITE
SATANINSM DATABASE ON THIS SITE
REPTILIAN DATABASE ON THIS SITE
FREEDOM DATABASE ON THIS SITE
JEAN HUDON DATABASE ON THIS SITE
CONSPIRACY DATABASE ON THIS SITE
DREAMS OF
THE GREAT EARTHCHANGES -
MAIN INDEX
|
1 comments:
Very, very nicely done.
Intentionally nor not, Superintendent Hatrick's decision places an explicit
value judgment on different family lives in a school system dedicated to
education of all, equally. It says, in effect, that some are more equal than
others.
There are those who will argue that the book's absence represents the
absence of a moral viewpoint, a viewpoint which is the parents' role to
provide, and is therefore a position of neutrality. They couldn't be
further from the truth. There is nothing neutral about erasing and
silencing people. The act of not talking about sexual minorities is itself
a moral judgment.
Parents in Lexington, Mass. have taken this approach one step further,
not only demanding that their children be shielded from seeing certain
books, but that they also be isolated from any circumstance in which
another child might talk about her own family if she has two dads or
two moms.
Tango is a happy story, as is any story where an orphaned child finds a
loving family - it hardly represents an "unfortunate fact" by any objec
tive standard. But even those parents who see it that way are in no way,
shape or form restricted from teaching their own children what they
think about it, nor should they be. They are completely free to tell their
child that "there are sometimes two men who raise children together
like Roy and Silo, but that it's unnatural and they're going to hell" if
that's what they want to do.
I think that what those parents are ultimately afraid of is that their
children will end up disagreeing with them.
There is another suspicious/peculiar aspect to the way this was
handled, and that is the decision to apply the restriction to all the
schools rather than just the one where the complaint was submitted
Normally, there would have to be a separate challenge and review
process at each school. We need to find out why that didn't happen.
There are links to other resources, including the written policy
governing book challenges, at Equality Loudoun's post.
http://www.leesburgtomorrow.us/2008/02/censorship-of-truth.html