| I have had multiple dreams and visions about comets, 
      which I have written about previously.  You will find those pages in 
      the database file below.  This one is incoming as we speak and has 
      not yet arrived, but has been seen by astronomers, ETs, government, etc.   
      You will see in the following paragraph why I'm writing about this old 
      poleshift. 
 The information about the new poleshift coming, you will find on this page: 
      
      http://www.greatdreams.com/poleshift.htm
 Poleshift is what happened before, and Poleshift is what is going to 
      happen this time as well.  Hopefully, positive thinking by many 
      people will help events to be calmer than they might otherwise be.   | 
    
      | 11-18-09 - DREAM - I found out that there were two comets incoming. One of 
      them was named "Watermark". The other one hadn't been named yet. A new law 
      was passed that forced people to pay the government more money because of 
      these comets, so I sat down and wrote a check for each one and sent them 
      in.
 
 I then went home to change clothes  and there were "suited" people in 
      my apartment making decisions about something, and one of the men was a 
      tall black man who I knew lived next door to me. I wondered why they were 
      using my apartment for their meeting instead of his. All the doors were 
      open down the hallway at the time I noticed.
 
 After I changed clothes, I went outside to look at the sky to watch for 
      the comets. The sky was a darker shade of blue but not yet dark 
      but the sun had gone down. I walked around outside wrapped in a white 
      sheet like a shroud. I didn't see anyone else out there watching the sky, 
      though there were people coming and going. It was like I was the only one 
      who knew the comets were coming, but I realized I looked like a religious 
      zealot walking around wearing the sheet.
 
          I received the book 'WATERMARK' by Joseph Christy 
      Vitale. I haven't opened it yet. It's about the comet that caused the 
      catastrophe on earth 12,000 years ago. I bought this book about my 
      previous dream in which I found out about two comets coming and one being 
      called 'Watermark'. 
 This is what I dreamed last night - I felt compelled to take a nap at 
      quarter past 8 and this is what I dreamed:
 
 11-25-09- DREAM - I was looking at a series of newspaper headlines and 
      actually plugging them into a program of some kind on a computer. The 
      headlines were all about disasters. The last three were, "COMETS COMING - 
      COMETS COMING - COMETS COMING!"
 11-25-09 - DREAM - I was working in a medium size office with some men.  
  The program on my computer was a file called  tuit2.  This program 
  had to end on December 31st, 2009 and it was all math calculations of some 
  kind.  A new file would be started on January 1st 2010, and would be 
  called  tuit3 .  The men did their calculations at their own desks 
  and the uploaded their files onto my computer when they were complete.  I 
  told them that as of January 1st, they would have to keep their own files on 
  floppies because tuit3 looked like a woman dressed in pink on television 
  giving the news - like the calculations for tuit2 were complete by then.
    I wanted to go home and when I went outside I forgot to take my sweater 
  or coat because it didn't seem necessary, but the farther I went along the 
  street, the colder it was getting - I was even seeing snow on the ground where 
  it wasn't before and shouldn't be that cold.  So I went back to the 
  office.   I was walking down the hall at work.  The floor was made of wood 
  with tiny slats - very shiny.  Ahead of me I saw my boss talking to 
  another man and it appeared that the other man was new and was in training to 
  be the new boss.  I had had the same boss for quite some time, so I 
  didn't know how a new boss would be to work with.  I hoped he'd be a good 
  guy and easy to work with but I had no way of knowing.  We hadn't been 
  introduced yet.   When I did go home, I turned on the TV which was quite large and sat on 
  the floor - not on a table.  It was a square box.  The program that 
  came on looked just like my computer screen at work, a lady dressed in pink 
  giving the news.  I tried to change the station and no matter what knob I 
  turned, the same program came on.  I even remarked that it seemed like 
  the knobs on the TV were upsidedown.  I couldn't change the channel no 
  matter what.
 | 
    
      | 
        
          
            11-27-09 - VISION - The words Miranmar and 
            Balincourt. Then 'Ruth Montgomery', and two extremely beautiful 
            silver scrolled necklaces. One was hers and one was mine and they 
            were identical. 
 http://www.dealbase.com/Destin/Majestic-Condos-Seascape-Resort-hotel-deals-4209  
            which is on the west coast of Mexico
 .
 http://www.balincourt.co.uk/_ (http://www.balincourt.co.uk/  
            which is on the west coast of England.
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Montgomery
 
 Montgomery also predicted in the 1970s and 1980s, that America would 
            have a "_walk-in_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walk-in) 
            " as president in the 1990s, ("unsure which term, 1992 or 1996") 
            before the Polar Shift, which was to happen "in the last months of 
            the century" as it seemed to "the Guides."
 
 NOTE: President Ronald Reagan was a walkin after he was shot. If 
            there is another one to come, we just have to wait for a 
            Presidential incident to know.
 
 In the late 1990s, the Guides predicted in her 1999 book, The World 
            To Come, that the walk-in president would not come until 2008 at the 
            earliest, and therefore the Shift would be delayed until 2010-2012 
            at least. The potential catastrophe of the shift was also reduced by 
            human free will. Except for Florida and the coast of California, the 
            Guides reported, most of America will survive.
 
 NOTE: My own predictions are the same - the coastlines of all 
            countries are in danger from tsunamis from the Watermark comet.
 
 I am also a walkin and corresponded with Ruth Montgomery back in the 
            1970's.  I'm more correctly a 'starseed' which is a bit 
            different, but life on earth is the same for both types - we are 
            here to learn lessons just like everyone else, but expected to do 
            more with our lives than most people here.  My page is at: 
            
            http://www.greatdreams.com/walkins.htm  It's been there 
            many years before today.
   | 
    
      | 11-26-09 - VISIONS -  I a drawing of a comet 
      coming down into the atmosphere.  Then I saw multiple yellow maps of 
      states but I couldn't read any of them.  I just knew it was similar 
      to maps I've seen of states.  I didn't see any large lakes or rivers 
      so it didn't seem to be in the Great Lakes area, nor on a coastline.
       NOTE:  This does not seem to match what has been 
      given by others about something hitting the water in an ocean and causing 
      a large tsunami.  It could however be another object than the 
      'Watermark' comet. I have seen two of them coming at the same time. | 
    
      | A VISION FROM ANOTHER SITE 
            I had a vision in DEC 2003 that to 
            this day makes me shiver even to think about it!
 I was hallucinating with few degrees of high fever and a very bad 
            Flu when had a vision in a dream state of mind half sleep half 
            awake.
 
 The vision I saw was about the coming Pole Shift, I saw two giant 
            Asteroids which were Comet type coming towards the earth the first 
            one passed by as people prayed and landed lots of hot brim stones 
            from it's tail on the earth causing many cities to burn and millions 
            to die and injure.
 
 About 6 month later the second Asteroid approached us hitting the 
            earth in Atlantic Ocean the asteroid was over 200 miles long, 
            causing 300 feet Tsunami waves.
 
 As we heard the giant noise the shift was starting since the Earth 
            was tilted because of massive impact and few hours of roaring sound 
            of earth crying laud like a pregnant mother ready to deliver it's 
            baby!
 
 After 6 hours of hell on earth our planet stopped rotating 
            completely here came the dead Silent! Our side the Americas was dark 
            near early morning around 5 AM dawn light but Sun Light was not 
            arriving all the people were waiting no one could move talk or say 
            anything most of them were sitting in a traffic jams in the free 
            ways, no radio, TV or any phone was working all satellites were off 
            their orbits all communications were down.
 
 Only some people could talk with Ham Radio.
 
 No one knew what to do all Gas stations were out due to shut down of 
            power no one knew what to say as clocks stopped earth stopped 
            rotating everyone was getting a panic attack.
 
 As we were waiting for sun to come out over 3 long days and nights 
            which was all night I was praying some Angel to come and take me to 
            hell and burn me so that I will not see these things and go thru 
            this pain of truth and reality which I was experiencing.
 
 This was not a Judgment day but almost the same since when time 
            stops your mind looses all references and starts going backward and 
            forward experiencing a total dimensional shift an Alienshift or 
            total ultimate Truth! At the same time it was a total fear factor.
 
 As I woke up from the dream the vision still was haunting me and 
            could not come out of it completely.
 
            
            I was keep looking outside was dark 
            about 4 AM also checking the clock and I noticed the time is not 
            moving again for about few minutes which was odd this was hell again 
            this time my eyes was wide open. 
 
            
            I was asking in a prayer why me, they 
            told me you asked for the vision that's why why was shown to you. 
            
            Then I asked are we going to die in 
            the Pole Shift they said no there are choices to be made.   
 As Bible mentions the Earth starts rotating again 3 days after the 
            shift with total darkness after the asteroid called Wormwood hits 
            the Earth.
 
 
            
            So remember that the earth goes 
            through this shift every 12,500 years.
 
            
            Alienshift believes Professor Sitchin 
            theory of every 3675 years of returning of planet X and Pole Shift 
            is wrong and correct number is every 12500 years. FROM:  http://www.alienshift.com/id1.html   | 
    
      | CHAPTER 1:  WATERMARK 
 
                  
                    Chapter One: In the Beginning 
                    Twelve thousand years ago countless 
                    humans, animals, and plants perished almost overnight, and 
                    great portions of the world were drastically and violently 
                    altered. Our ancestors, numb with shock and exhaustion, 
                    faced a challenge: either cease to exist as a species or 
                    survive in a grave new world. This is not exactly the 
                    history most of us were taught in school. Yet it is there, 
                    told in the scars on stones, the broken and buried bones of 
                    animals, and the memories of our species. 
 We thrust a stick into a clear pond, and it looks broken. It 
                    is just a distortion of light, but our eyes, ignorant of the 
                    physics behind it, see only a broken stick. As we look back 
                    in history, time distorts what we perceive, and even though 
                    we believe we understand its nature, we see history like 
                    that broken stick. This distortion is then magnified by both 
                    facts and our subjectivity, leaving us, in the end, with a 
                    flawed view of our past. This view, when enough people 
                    believe it to be true, becomes our worldview or paradigm.
 This book is about a subject as simple 
                    yet as complex as that stick. It involves time, space, the 
                    Ice Age, Paradise, the nature of God, how we came to be who 
                    we are, and the end of the world. In other words: 
                    everything.  Our story begins in the late 18th and 
                    early 19th centuries when scholars and scientists developed 
                    a global paradigm. They had grown aware, through accumulated 
                    evidence, of immense scarred rocks scattered across the 
                    world in unexpected places. They also found deep deposits of 
                    sands, gravels, and mud in valleys and on mountaintops, 
                    broken and shattered animal bones in vast numbers, and made 
                    the first discoveries of frozen mammoth carcasses in the 
                    Arctic. From this hard evidence these scientists and 
                    scholars concluded that at some time in the not-too-distant 
                    past, the world suffered an appalling disaster. The 
                    hypothesis they developed was called Catastrophism. Much 
                    debate determined that water, in massive and swiftly moving 
                    amounts, was probably the main culprit. Among scientists and 
                    the general public many saw this as evidence of the Biblical 
                    Flood. To the surprise and pleasure of the clergy, science 
                    now supported their religious convictions. Yet even as they 
                    spoke of this momentous conversion from the pulpit, the 
                    Floodwaters, in some minds, were already beginning to 
                    freeze.  In 1830, Charles Lyell, a lawyer and 
                    amateur geologist, published his Principles of Geology. He 
                    insisted that instead of a sudden worldwide flood, a long, 
                    gradual accumulation of debris over millions of years had 
                    created the evidence. The hypothesis came to be called 
                    Uniformitarianism. He went on to say that the cause was 
                    terrestrial rather than cosmic and divine in nature, and if 
                    ever there was a catastrophic flood it was a regional and 
                    not global event. Lyell's idea proved to be popular among 
                    scientists. Over the following century his approach to 
                    geology and history replaced the catastrophic point-of-view 
                    and opened the door to the concept of the Ice Age, Darwin's 
                    revolution in evolution, and more recently the belief in 
                    continental drift and plate tectonics. Considered together 
                    they have established the current unifying paradigm of our 
                    world.  Today the wind has changed. Our current 
                    fascination with Uniformity and our belief in the long, slow 
                    geological and evolutionary process is beginning to crumble, 
                    like immense stone blocks falling from a walled city. 
                     How do we know the walls are crumbling? Imagine a barking 
                    dog nipping at your heels, demanding your attention. Most of 
                    us would look down to see what the commotion was about, 
                    because from our earliest memories this companion has 
                    alerted us to things we should pay heed to. Our association 
                    with dogs has changed us profoundly, though some consider 
                    them a nuisance. Science would call this pesky canine 
                    behavior an anomaly. An anomaly is an unexplained fact, a 
                    fact that can contradict part of the prevailing paradigm. 
                    When enough anomalies are taken together, creating a 
                    hypothesis that better explains the nature of life, they can 
                    alter or push aside an old crumbling worldview.
 This push has been occurring, for a 
                    number of years, with patience only Job or a glacier could 
                    muster. It has come from many quarters. Among others, are 
                    the observations of Immanuel Velikovsky, with his Worlds in 
                    Collision books, which have received either howls of 
                    indignation or the cold silence of an empty church from the 
                    orthodox science establishment. His ideas in general have 
                    been rejected but not refuted. Undeniable truths have 
                    survived and become seeds that have, over the years, erupted 
                    through to the public and are splintering and cracking the 
                    foundations of the current paradigm.  The first seed sprouted in 1972 when 
                    Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould proposed their 
                    "punctuated equilibrium" hypothesis. It says that a period 
                    of geological and/or evolutionary stability can be regularly 
                    interrupted by swift and even radical change. In other 
                    words, catastrophes can happen. A serious crack in Lyell's 
                    Uniformity then appeared in 1980 when Louis and Walter 
                    Alvarez introduced their impact hypothesis, which attempts 
                    to explain the mass extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million 
                    years ago. Their idea of a comet or asteroid colliding with 
                    Earth was first met with the same shrill reception as 
                    Velikovsky's ideas, but today most scientists accept it. 
                    Both "punctuated equilibrium" and the Alvarez impact have 
                    helped move science away from a narrow and extreme view of 
                    Uniformity toward a middle ground where occasional (in 
                    geological time) catastrophes occur.  The cracks are also appearing, rarely 
                    noticed by the general public or even science journals, down 
                    corridors and around coffee machines of universities, 
                    museums, and in the field. The debates revolve around the 
                    nature of these catastrophes and whether they ever occurred, 
                    particularly the one central to our story. The discussions 
                    are heated, because a new scientific revolution is being 
                    born. For some, change is difficult.  In this book we are embarking on a 
                    journey back through time to a momentous event 12,000 years 
                    ago. (Sources agree that the actual event described in these 
                    pages occurred 11,500 years ago, rather than the 12,000 year 
                    figure I use in this book. I've added 500 years -- a blink 
                    of an eye in the geological time span -- merely for the 
                    convenience of a nice round number, and for ease of 
                    discussion.) This event dramatically altered the makeup of 
                    our solar system. It has been ignored, misrepresented, and 
                    forgotten by most, though we glimpse it, like a phantom 
                    darting in the shadows, out of the corner of our eye. It 
                    haunts us every day in the reality we have created for 
                    ourselves, and in the ways we treat one another and all life 
                    on this planet. It haunts us in the terrible contradictions 
                    we come to accept on a daily basis and feel powerless to 
                    change. It haunts us because it is the source of how and why 
                    we came to be who we are today.  We will trace a path littered with 
                    evidence left for us by a trinity of testimony: biology, 
                    geology, and our human memory. Combining into an image 
                    beautiful and terrible, consistent and complete, it will 
                    challenge what we believe we know about our distant past. We 
                    will follow the drama from its beginning to its inevitable 
                    end, the desperate aftermath, and life's scarred 
                    resurrection on this third planet from the sun. 
                     In a sense it is a pilgrimage, as we 
                    stop along our way to look upon anomalies, recall ancient 
                    memories, and realize that we are reclaiming our past. These 
                    moments may startle us, like a dog's sharp bark, and when we 
                    gaze up the world will begin to change. Not physically but 
                    intuitively. A pilgrimage is really a journey to oneself, 
                    and this book is no different. As we proceed, the complex 
                    and incomplete hypotheses of science and the blinders of 
                    religious beliefs will drop from our eyes. This journey goes 
                    beyond dogmas to look upon the past with clear eyes and to 
                    witness the spirit of all our ancient ancestors, as they 
                    stood on the edge of the abyss. We are going to remove the 
                    stick from the water, gaze upon it unbroken, and remember.
                     Copyright © 2004 by Joseph 
                    Christy-Vitale 
  
Excerpts from Chapter 3 
THE LIVING EVIDENCE Excerpts P. 14 -   The Canary islands are located off the 
Atlantic coast of northwest Africa.  They are volcanic islands partially 
created by volcanic eruptions 12,000 years ago. They were known to the Greeks 
and the Romans over 2,000 years ago. Beneath these islands we find earthworms.  
Earthworms are blind and deaf and are unable to survive immersion in salt water. 
Our Canary island earthworms are so similar to European earthworms, science 
suggests that Europe was once connected to the Canary islands. P. 15 - Crossing the South Atlantic reveals another 
mystery:  the monk seal. Rarely venturing into open ocean, this endangered 
animal is found along the eastern coast of South America and, until the last 
century, in the West Indies. Back across the Atlantic monk seals can be found 
barking on the shores of West Africa and the western Mediterranean. How did 
these seals get from West Africa to South America without crossing the open 
ocean? According to the current continental drift hypothesis, the 
American continents became separated from the old world 65 to over 130 million 
years ago.  At  that point the carnivorous, arboreal, tropical 
forest-dwelling ancestor of the monk seal was not even a glimmer in Nature's 
eye. Another cause is needed. Below Earth's oceans there exist 5,000 species of sponges, 
but only 20 are native to freshwater; these are unable to survive in salt water.  
One, Heteromeyenia ryderi, is found only along rivers and lakes from Florida to 
Newfoundland along the Atlantic Coast of North America, and across 3,000 miles 
of salty ocean on the west coasts of Ireland and Scotland.  This 
distribution has been a puzzle to those scholars who are not worried about what 
questions to ask, or what answers may arise. Many more examples are given. THE DEAD EVIDENCE P. 21 Lignite, sometimes called brown coal, is found world wide. 
Similar to soft coal and peat, it is used as a fuel in northern climates. In 
lignite you will usually find the texture of the original wood that formed it. 
Because of this, its age is not considered great. Difficult questions arise, 
however, when the trees found in the lignite are not local. Where do they come 
from and how did they get there?  In Germany many of the lignite beds are 
associated with swamp bogs. But the remains found in the bogs are sequoia, a 
tree that does not grow in swamps.  They could only have been carried and 
buried here.  Australia has similar deposits. Near Morwell, in Victoria, 
the lignite is found 200 feet below the surface and is nearly 800 feet thick.  
They numbers of trees found are prodigious and well reserved and include many 
that are not common to the region.  Again, they could only have been 
carried and then buried there. P. 23 In treeless Greenland, the remains of pinecones, acorns, 
sequoias, oaks, maples, and magnolia are found together in confused masses in a 
land today synonymous with ice, not temperate forest.   Prehistorians gave the name Fennoscandia to a landmass 
that, 12,000 years ago, sank into what is today the Arctic ocean. It included 
much of northern Eurasia and the now numerous island archipelagos that are found 
in the Arctic Ocean, some laying less than 500 miles from the North Pole. The 
remains of immense forests here staggered the first scientists who explored 
these lands in the 1800s. 12,000 years ago, forests of alder, elm, and oak 
reached far into the Arctic from the Ural mountains and Siberia. Today they lie 
buried in frozen ground where no bushes and trees can survive.  P. 24 The loss of animal life 12,000 years ago was also profound. 
Biologists have difficulty communicating the magnitude of extinction that 
occurred during this time period.  In 'When the Earth Nearly Died', 
paleogeographic researcher Derek Allan and Geological surveyor J. Bernard Delair 
summarize their frustration when they write 'immense herds of diverse animals 
utterly vanished off the face of the earth for no obvious biological reason. 
 Note: He goes on to say that in many lignite beds, bones of 
animals are mixed in a jumbled mass along with trees, bushes, plants and grass. 
Some of the buried forests still have their berries and nuts on them, mixed in 
with the bones of mammoths, horses, hippopotamuses and other species. 
 Whale bones are found near the tops of mountains.  
 P 26. Throughout the Mediterranean region, there are caves and 
fissures filled from the narrowest cracks in the walls and floors all the way up 
to the roofs with the smashed remains of hundreds of species of animals, 
reptiles, amphibians, crustaceans and sediment,  From the Rock of Gibraltar 
to Sicily, Male and Crete scientists have uncovered these dens of death.  
Sea and land shells, turtle, shark, lizard, hyena, bear, elephant, hippopotamus 
- including pigmy hippopotamus found living today only in West Africa - bird, 
rodent, deer, ox, lion, wooly rhinoceros, and mammoth have been found crushed 
together in these caves, fissures, and crevices. P. 29 Siberia is well known for its frozen mammoth carcasses. 
These are still being discovered, and while few in number, speculation and 
hypothesis whirl, like a blizzard, around them. Some scientists believe 
numerous, gradual climate changes melted the ice sheets and broke up the land, 
creating the crevasses that these mammoths fell into, where they died and were 
frozen. Some think the climate changes produced occasional meltdowns, at various 
times over tens of thousands of years, which sent water burning through ice dams 
and caught the animals unaware. In either case the causes remain comfortably 
within the Ice Age hypothesis.  The climate, shown in floral studies, was 
considerably milder than today. These mammoth carcasses were not found in ice, 
but buried in now frozen sediment or mud, meaning the ground was not frozen when 
the animals died, otherwise they could not have been buried whole. The ground 
then had to freeze quickly, not gradually, before the animals decomposed. end chapter notes   | 
    
      | WATERMARK - BOOK REVIEW 
            From Publishers Weekly
            
              The pyramids of Egypt and Central 
              America; diluvial deposits high up on mountain sides; strange 
              collections of animal bones in North American caves— 
              Christy-Vitale, amateur scientist and travel industry consultant, 
              believes these seemingly unconnected phenomena hint at a cosmic 
              catastrophe 12,000 years ago: a supernova 45 light-years from 
              Earth that shot a chunk of the star (which he calls Phaeton) into 
              our solar system, shattering a 10th planet between Mars and 
              Jupiter into what we know as the asteroid belt, killing off 
              thousands of animal species and almost extinguishing an advanced 
              human civilization. Memories of this event live on in stories of a 
              golden age destroyed in a worldwide flood. While Christy-Vitale 
              seems never to have met a myth he didn't like, he ignores some 
              basic scientific facts. If a supernova had exploded in our 
              vicinity even in the last 100,000 years, its glowing shell would 
              still be visible. Also, supernovas don't shoot off 
              mini-stars—rather, these cosmic explosions tend to pepper the 
              surrounding cosmos with an iron isotope; scientists haven't found 
              a layer dating from this era. There is also no evidence of a 
              genetic "bottleneck" in humans dating back a mere 10,000 years. 
              Christy-Vitale believes that the chunk of star dust zooming past 
              us caused Earth to flip back and forth on its axis, resulting in, 
              among other things, the current configuration of the continents. 
              So much for continental drift. Christy-Vitale's scenario is an 
              interesting one, but he seems more a New Age Erik Von Daniken than 
              someone advancing a revisionist theory that will attract serious 
              scientific attention. 
 Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier 
              Inc. All rights reserved.
 
    | 
    
      | Ancient crash, epic wave 
                   By Sandra BlakesleePublished: Saturday, October 14, 2006At the southern end of Madagascar lie four enormous 
                    wedge-shaped sediment deposits, called chevrons, that are 
                    composed of material from the ocean floor. Each covers twice 
                    the area of Manhattan with sediment as deep as the Chrysler 
                    Building is high.On close inspection, the chevron 
                    deposits contain deep ocean microfossils that are fused with 
                    a medley of metals typically formed by cosmic impacts. And 
                    all of them point in the same direction - toward the middle 
                    of the Indian Ocean where a newly discovered crater, 18 
                    miles in diameter, lies 12,500 feet below the surface. The explanation is obvious to some scientists. A large 
                    asteroid or comet, the kind that could kill a quarter of the 
                    world's population, smashed into the Indian Ocean 4,800 
                    years ago, producing a tsunami at least 600 feet high, about 
                    13 times as big as the one that inundated Indonesia nearly 
                    two years ago. The wave carried the huge deposits of 
                    sediment to land. Most astronomers doubt that any large comets or asteroids 
                    have crashed into the Earth in the last 10,000 years. But 
                    the self-described "band of misfits" that make up the 
                    two-year-old Holocene Impact Working Group say that 
                    astronomers simply have not known how or where to look for 
                    evidence of such impacts along the world's shorelines and in 
                    the deep ocean. Scientists in the working group say the evidence for such 
                    impacts during the last 10,000 years, known as the Holocene 
                    epoch, is strong enough to overturn current estimates of how 
                    often the Earth suffers a violent impact on the order of a 
                    10-megaton explosion. Instead of once in 500,000 to one 
                    million years, as astronomers now calculate, catastrophic 
                    impacts could happen every few thousand years. The researchers, who formed the working group after 
                    finding one another through an international conference, are 
                    based in the United States, Australia, Russia, France and 
                    Ireland. They are established experts in geology, 
                    geophysics, geomorphology, tsunamis, tree rings, soil 
                    science and archaeology, including the structural analysis 
                    of myth. Their efforts are just getting under way, but they 
                    will present some of their work at the American Geophysical 
                    Union meeting in December in San Francisco. This year the group started using Google Earth, a free 
                    source of satellite images, to search around the globe for 
                    chevrons, which they interpret as evidence of past giant 
                    tsunamis. Scores of such sites have turned up in Australia, 
                    Africa, Europe and the United States, including the Hudson 
                    River Valley and Long Island. When the chevrons all point in the same direction to open 
                    water, Dallas Abbott, an adjunct research scientist at 
                    Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., uses a 
                    different satellite technology to look for oceanic craters. 
                    With increasing frequency, she finds them, including an 
                    especially large one dating back 4,800 years. So far, astronomers are skeptical but are willing to look 
                    at the evidence, said David Morrison, a leading authority on 
                    asteroids and comets at the NASA Ames Research Center in 
                    Mountain View, Calif. Surveys show that as many as 185 large 
                    asteroids or comets hit the Earth in the far distant past, 
                    although most of the craters are on land. No one has spent 
                    much time looking for craters in the deep ocean, Morrison 
                    said, assuming young ones don't exist and that old ones 
                    would be filled with sediment. Astronomers monitor every small space object with an 
                    orbit close to the Earth. "We know what's out there, when 
                    they return, how close they come," Morrison said. Given 
                    their observations, "there is no reason to think we have had 
                    major hits in the last 10,000 years," he continued, adding, 
                    "But if Dallas is right and they find 10 such events, we'll 
                    have a real contradiction on our hands." Peter Bobrowski, a senior research scientist in natural 
                    hazards at the Geological Survey of Canada, said "chevrons 
                    are fantastic features" but do not prove that megatsunamis 
                    are real. There are other interpretations for how chevrons 
                    are formed, including erosion and glaciation. Bobrowski 
                    said. It is up to the working group to prove its claims, he 
                    said. William Ryan, a marine geologist at the Lamont 
                    Observatory, compared Abbott's work to that of other 
                    pioneering scientists who had to change the way their 
                    colleagues thought about a subject.
          
          
          "Many of us think Dallas is really onto something," Ryan 
                    said. "She is building a story just like Walter Alvarez 
                    did." Alvarez, a professor of earth and planetary sciences 
                    at the University of California, Berkeley, spent a decade 
                    convincing skeptics that a giant asteroid wiped out the 
                    dinosaurs 65 million years ago. 
                  Ted Bryant, a 
                    geomorphologist at the University of Wollongong in New South 
                    Wales, Australia, was the first person to recognize the palm 
                    prints of mega-tsunamis. Large tsunamis of 30 feet or more 
                    are caused by volcanoes, earthquakes and submarine 
                    landslides, he said, and their deposits have different 
                    features. Deposits from mega-tsunamis contain unusual rocks with 
                    marine oyster shells, which cannot be explained by wind 
                    erosion, storm waves, volcanoes or other natural processes, 
                    Bryant said. "We're not talking about any tsunami you're ever seen," 
                    Bryant said. "Aceh was a dimple. No tsunami in the modern 
                    world could have made these features. End-of-the-world 
                    movies do not capture the size of these waves. Submarine 
                    landslides can cause major tsunamis, but they are localized. 
                    These are deposited along whole coastlines." For example, Bryant identified two chevrons found over 
                    four miles inland near Carpentaria in north central 
                    Australia. Both point north. When Abbott visited a year ago, 
                    he asked her to find the craters. To locate craters, Abbott uses sea surface altimetry 
                    data. Satellites scan the ocean surface and log the exact 
                    height of it. Underwater mountain ranges, trenches and holes 
                    in the ground disturb the Earth's gravitational field, 
                    causing sea surface heights to vary by fractions of an inch. 
                    Within 24 hours of searching the shallow water north of the 
                    two chevrons, Abbott found two craters. Not all depressions in the ocean are impact craters, 
                    Abbott said. They can be sink holes, faults or remnant 
                    volcanoes. A check is needed. So she obtained samples from 
                    deep sea sediment cores taken in the area by the Australian 
                    Geological Survey. The cores contain melted rocks and magnetic spheres with 
                    fractures and textures characteristic of a cosmic impact. 
                    "The rock was pulverized, like it was hit with a hammer," 
                    Abbott said. "We found diatoms fused to tektites," a glassy 
                    substance formed by meteors. The molten glass and shattered 
                    rocks could not be produced by anything other than an 
                    impact, she said. "We think these two craters are 1,200 years old," Abbott 
                    said. The chevrons are well preserved and date to about the 
                    same time. Abbott and her colleagues have located chevrons in the 
                    Caribbean, Scotland, Vietnam and North Korea, and several in 
                    the North Sea. Heather Hill State Park on Long Island has a chevron 
                    whose front edge points to a crater in Long Island Sound, 
                    Abbott said. There is another, very faint chevron in 
                    Connecticut, and it points in a different direction. Marie-Agnès Courty, a soil scientist at the European 
                    Center for Prehistoric Research in Tautavel, France, is 
                    studying the worldwide distribution of cosmogenic particles 
                    from what she suspects was a major impact 4,800 years ago. But Madagascar provides the smoking gun for geologically 
                    recent impacts. In August, Abbott, Bryant and Slava 
                    Gusiakov, from the Novosibirsk Tsunami Laboratory in Russia, 
                    visited the four huge chevrons to scoop up samples. Last month, Dee Breger, director of microscopy at Drexel 
                    University in Philadelphia, looked at the samples under a 
                    scanning electron microscope and found benthic foraminifera, 
                    tiny fossils from the ocean floor, sprinkled throughout. Her 
                    close-ups revealed splashes of iron, nickel and chrome fused 
                    to the fossils. When a chondritic meteor, the most common kind, vaporizes 
                    upon impact in the ocean, those three metals are formed in 
                    the same relative proportions as seen in the microfossils, 
                    Abbott said. Breger said the microfossils appear to have melded with 
                    the condensing metals as both were lofted up out of the sea 
                    and carried long distances. About 900 miles southeast from the Madagascar chevrons, 
                    in deep ocean, is Burckle crater, which Abbott discovered 
                    last year. Although its sediments have not been directly 
                    sampled, cores from the area contain high levels of nickel 
                    and magnetic components associated with impact ejecta. Burckle crater has not been dated, but Abbott estimates 
                    that it is 4,500 to 5,000 years old. It would be a great help to the cause if the National 
                    Science Foundation sent a ship equipped with modern acoustic 
                    equipment to take a closer look at Burckle, Ryan said. "If 
                    it had clear impact features, the nonbelievers would 
                    believe," he said. But they might have more trouble believing one of the 
                    scientists, Bruce Masse, an environmental archaeologist at 
                    the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. He thinks 
                    he can say precisely when the comet fell: on the morning of 
                    May 10, 2807 B.C. Masse analyzed 175 flood myths from around the world, and 
                    tried to relate them to known and accurately dated natural 
                    events like solar eclipses and volcanic eruptions. Among 
                    other evidence, he said, 14 flood myths specifically mention 
                    a full solar eclipse, which could have been the one that 
                    occurred in May 2807 B.C. Half the myths talk of a torrential downpour, Masse said. 
                    A third talk of a tsunami. Worldwide they describe hurricane 
                    force winds and darkness during the storm. All of these 
                    could come from a mega-tsunami. Of course, extraordinary claims require extraordinary 
                    proof, Masse said, "and we're not there yet."
           
                    
           
                    
           
       FROM:
      
      http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/14/health/14iht-web.1114meteor.3522140.html?_r=1   | 
    
      | ussian scientists to establish origin of Great Flood Russian researchers from the University 
                      oat the Great Flood 
                      of 2800 BCE came as a result of Earth’s collision with 
                      some heavenly body.     Scientists research Great Flood 
                  theories Viacheslav Gusiakov, the laboratory’s 
                      director at the Calculus and Mathematical Geophysics 
                      Institute, told Interfax that the actual cause of the 
                      ancient global catastrophe could be established within a 
                      few months as soon the researchers complete their 
                      examining of the sand hill samples.   These samples were collected by the 
                      international expedition members in the area of difficult 
                      access near the Madagascar Island between the Fenambosi 
                      and Ampalaza gulfs.   With the help of the satellite images 
                      scientists were able to discover at this particular spot 
                      the so-called herringbone dunes, which were located far 
                      beyond the regular shore dunes but were clearly formed by 
                      the rising water flow judging by their design.   The size of one sand dune that 
                      stretches out for 40 km from the shore back into the 
                      depths of dry land suggests that the wave, which became 
                      its source of origin, washed out onto the shore to the 
                      distance of few dozens kilometers.   
                      Source: Agencies Translated by Natalia 
                      VysotskayaPravda.ru
 FROM:
                      
                      http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/23-10-2006/85159-dunes-0 | 
    
      | VELIKOVSKY - COMET 
      WHO WAS VELIKOVSKY? Pole Shifts - Velikovsky
                       
   
                        
 Immanuel Velikovsky(1895-1979)
 Velikovsky was born in Vitebsk, 
                        Russia. As a child he learned several languages, and 
                        excelled in mathematics. In 1913 he travelled to Europe, 
                        visiting Palestine, briefly studying medicine at 
                        Montpelier, France, and taking premedical courses at the 
                        University of Edinburgh.  Just before the outbreak of World War 
                        I, Velikovsky returned to his homeland and enrolled in 
                        the University of Moscow, where he received a medical 
                        degree in 1921. From there he went to Berlin, where he 
                        married a young violinist and became the general editor 
                        of the journal, Scripta Universitatis. During 
                        this time he became acquainted with Albert Einstein, who 
                        edited the journal's mathematical-physical section. 
                        Velikovsky shifted to Palestine in 1924 and practiced 
                        psychoanalysis for the next 15 years. Some of his 
                        writings appeared in Freud's Imago.  In 1940, Velikovsky studied a number 
                        of natural disasters that occur in the Bible, such as 
                        the parting of the Red Sea and the eruption of Mt. 
                        Sinai. When he compared these biblical passages to 
                        similar entries in some obscure Egyptian texts, he 
                        became convinced they were describing the same 
                        catastrophes, and went about reconstructing ancient 
                        Middle Eastern time-lines to make both sides fit. 
                        
                         After studying other historical 
                        records, he became convinced that many catastrophes were 
                        linked to a single global cataclysm, and that Venus was 
                        involved. In 1939 he shifted to the United States and 
                        for the next ten years he researched these topics, the 
                        result being two separate books: Ages in Chaos - 
                        a historical reconstruction covering the years 1450 BC 
                        to 840 B.C, and Worlds in Collision. In 1950 Macmillan published Worlds 
                        in Collision. It described how 3,500 years ago Venus 
                        was ejected from Jupiter as a comet - then started a 
                        wayward path through the solar system. Its gravitational 
                        field moved other planets out of their orbits or 
                        affected their rotation - including Earth's. Macmillan, 
                        who publish many textbooks, came under fire from 
                        scientists and academics who considered Velikovsky's 
                        ideas to be unacceptable - ideas at odds with 
                        uniformitarianism. The book was consequently banned from 
                        many academic institutions. Although it was at the top 
                        of the New York Times non-fiction bestseller list, 
                        Macmillan gave in and transferred the book to Doubleday. 
                        In 1952 Doubleday pub1ished Velikovsky's Ages in 
                        Chaos.  As an answer to 
                        his critics, Velikovsky's third book, Earth in 
                        Upheaval (1955), presented raw data that would 
                        validate any global cataclysm theory: 
                          "I have excluded from [these pages] 
                          all references to ancient literature, traditions, and 
                          folklore; and this I have done with intent, so that 
                          careless critics cannot decry the entire work as 
                          "tales and legends". Stones and bones are the only 
                          witness."[4] It was fully 
                        referenced and designed to gain the support of orthodox 
                        science - however academia had already determined that 
                        anything he ever wrote would automatically be 
                        unacceptable. Meanwhile Velikovsky had been 
                        maintaining contact with Einstein - he would send him 
                        letters and manuscripts and Einstein would return them, 
                        usually with comments written in the margins. With 
                        regards to Earth in Upheaval, Einstein accepted 
                        all the evidence of sudden violence upon the Earth, but 
                        he rejected Venus as being the cause. Nine days after 
                        their final meeting Einstein died, and a copy of 
                        Worlds in Collision was found open on his desk. He 
                        was rereading it because latest discoveries concerning 
                        Jupiter had confirmed one of Velikovsky's predictions. It is currently accepted that a comet 
                        wiped out the dinosaurs, yet in the 1950s, when 
                        Velikovsky suggested similar ideas, he was rejected. In 
                        fact many of his radical ideas that orthodox science 
                        originally laughed at, due to their lack of scientific 
                        foundation, have become proven facts: 
                          Velikovsky deduced each of these facts 
                        many years before mainstream science found ways to prove 
                        them. He also stated that after its close encounters 
                        with Earth, Mars and the Sun, Venus would have a much 
                        higher than expected temperature, would be enveloped in 
                        hydrocarbon clouds (remnants of its comet's tail), and 
                        would have an anomalous rotation. The scientists' 
                        predictions - a similar temperature to Earth, an 
                        atmosphere of carbon dioxide or water and standard 
                        rotation - have all since been shown to be wrong. Venus 
                        has a surface temperature of 750 degrees Kelvin - hot 
                        enough to melt lead. Its atmosphere is full of 
                        hydrocarbons and its rotation is in an opposite 
                        direction to all the other planets.
                          ·
                          Jupiter periodically 
                          becomes unstable and ejects excess mass. 
                           
                          ·
                          Jupiter emits non-thermal radio noise.
                           
                          ·
                          Comets can be rich in 
                          hydrocarbons, with highly energetic electrical tails.
                           
                          ·
                          The Moon has had 
                          recent surface melting, seismic and volcanic activity, 
                          none of which should be true for a body that had 
                          supposedly been dead for 4.5 billion years. With hindsight, academia should be 
                        re-examining his work, for more of his startling ideas 
                        could also be correct. Here is Velikovsky's hypothesis 
                        on what may have previously happened to our planet: 
                          ".that under the impact of a force 
                          or the influence of an agent - and the earth does not 
                          travel in an empty universe - the axis of the earth 
                          shifted or tilted. At that moment an earthquake would 
                          make the globe shudder. Air and water would continue 
                          to move through inertia; hurricanes would sweep the 
                          earth and the seas would rush over continents, 
                          carrying gravel and sand and marine animals, and 
                          casting them on the land. Heat would be developed, 
                          rocks would melt, volcanoes would erupt, and lava 
                          would flow from fissures in the ruptured ground and 
                          cover vast areas. Mountains would spring up from the 
                          plains and would travel and climb on the shoulders of 
                          other mountains, causing faults and rifts. Lakes would 
                          be tilted and emptied, rivers would change their beds; 
                          large land areas with all their inhabitants would slip 
                          under the sea. Forests would burn, and the hurricanes 
                          and wild seas would wrest them from the ground on 
                          which they grew and pile them, branch and root, in 
                          huge heaps." "Water evaporated from the oceans 
                        would rise in clouds and fall again in torrential rains 
                        and snowfalls. Clouds of dust, ejected by numerous 
                        volcanoes and swept by hurricanes from the ground.all 
                        this dust would keep the rays of the sun from 
                        penetrating to the earth."[5] Perhaps the extra-terrestrial agent 
                        was a force such as an electromagnetic field? The Earth 
                        is a giant magnet, and the fields would act upon each 
                        other. Duration would not be a factor - if the strength 
                        of this field were strong enough to tip the earth over, 
                        it would happen instantly, triggering the effects 
                        Velikovsky listed above.  
                          
                          
                          [4] Immanuel Velikovsky, Earth in Upheaval 
                          (1955), preface. 
                          
                          
                          [5] Immanuel Velikovsky, Earth in Upheaval 
                          (1955), p.120-121  
                 
                        FROM:
                        
                        http://survive2012.com/index.php/pole-shifts-velikovsky.html   | 
    
      | VELIKOVSKY OPINION JUPITER IN COLLISION: IN SEARCH OF VELIKOVSKY'S COMET
Milton Zysman
Introduction
"Of all the mysterious phenomena which accompanied the Exodus, this mysterious
pillar seems the first to demand explanation."
Velikovsky came to his catastrophic thesis through a search for a reliable
chronology for ancient middle eastern history.  This search, born of the
realization that both Egyptians and Israelites alike went through a great
physical upheaval, gave rise to the most influential work on catastrophism
published in this century.
Hebrew traditions of the red and poisonous Nile, the impenetrable darkness,
the hot stones from heaven, the great winds and noise, the anomalous
behaviour of insects and animals and the tidal effect at the Sea of Passage
were collected and matched to other worldwide ancient traditions, convincing
Velikovsky that the Exodus event was part of a global upheaval caused in
great part by the passage of the Earth through the tail of a giant
protoplanet.
Velikovsky drew this original inspiration not from Exodus, but from an event
that occurred, according to Biblical sources, 52 years later in the time of
Joshua.  On that great day, when the sun did not hasten to go down,
Velikovsky remembered the shower of hot stones which killed more of Joshua's
enemies than did the battling Israelites.
Velikovsky realized that these scientifically naive people could not have
deliberately coupled a large scale meteoric shower with a disturbance in the
Earth's diurnal rotation.  Since meteoric showers, great and .small, are
understood to be debris entrained by comets, Velikovsky took the next logical
step by gleaning the Bible and associated Talmudic sources for evidence of a
comet during Exodus and Joshua.
It was then that the "mysterious pillar" became the tail of the protoplanet
Venus.  Velikovsky claimed: "Because of the proximity of the Earth, the comet
left its own orbit and for a while followed the orbit of the Earth.  The
great ball of the comet retreated, then again approached the Earth, shrouded
in a dark column of gases which looked like a pillar of smoke during the day
and of fire by night and the Earth once more passed through the atmosphere of
the comet, this time at its neck."
It has been for some time this author's opinion that this "mysterious pillar"
is not a comet's tail, but the Earth's north and south magnetic poles
illuminated by the joint action of electrical discharge and the commingling of
Earthly and cometary gases.  In other words, a giant aurora.
In this paper I will argue that the early reports from the Jupiter/Comet
Shoemaker-Levy 9 event can cast further light on the aurora thesis and bring
us closer to understanding the full significance of Velikovsky's catastrophic
vision.
Comet of Typhon
It may have evaded the scrutiny of even the most assiduous Velikovskians that
there is very little direct evidence for the appearance of a comet during
both the Exodus and the Joshua stories. All the indicators of a great
meteoric shower are in place and it can be argued that any well-informed
tribal leader or court magician would have little trouble inferring its
involvement, yet we have no specific mention of a comet being observed before
or during the event. Great signs were in abundance in the heavens- in
particular the enigmatic arm of the Lord mentioned many times in Exodus and
other rabbinical sources.  Little, however, in the way of a glowing body with
a tail is mentioned.
It is no wonder then that Velikovsky calls on the "mysterious pillar" for
help.  Yet it is not Exodus he turns to in reconstructing the days of Exodus
and Joshua, but to the great Greek tradition of the fight between Zeus and
Typhon.  Velikovsky inserted this account of a central god throwing
thunderbolts and great balls of fire at an encircling deity as an explanation
of how a comet loses and regains its tail:
"Some saw the pillar of cloud- Typhon defeated by Jupiter, the ball of fire
that emerged from the pillar and battled with it.  Others interpreted the
globe as a body different from Jupiter ... the imagination of the people saw
in this the planet-god Jupiter-Marduk rushing to save the Earth by killing the
serpent-monster Typhon/Tiamat."
I will not dwell on the physical adequacy of this imported image, for it
contains intrinsic difficulties.  The greater problem is that, inadequate as
this exotic image is, it is not described in similar terms either in Exodus or
Joshua.  It is always, in Hebrew traditions, a singular body.  Its only
variant is the crooked or brazen serpent. Moreover, Velikovsky does not
deal adequately with the remarkably stable nature of the pillar.  Neither the
atmospheric nor the orbital elements of a comet's tail could have retained the
definite shape of a column for any length of time, yet-this same column was
reported to have shed light on the wandering tribes for over 40 years.
The Great Aurora
Velikovsky's decision to identify the "mysterious pillar" as the tail of Venus
effectively foreclosed his further access to one of the most powerful ancient
icons, for the pillar of light and smoke can be none other than the northern
extension of the world axis or Axis Mundi.
The primal universe pictured the world axis with its principal pillar to the
north- the less important southern element appearing to pass through the disc
or sphere of the Earth and extend into the underworld.
Hebrew tradition, like most major cultures, gives us many static and dynamic
variations of the pillar of smoke and fire.  In Genesis it is the trunk of
the trees of life and knowledge.  In the post-Exodus period, the wooden
pillar, emblematic of the Hebrew goddess, was offered human sacrifices "in
high places."  So important was this idol that it replaced the ark of the
covenant in the temple on a number of occasions.
Velikovsky would have found it difficult to miss this icon in his research. 
An author he referred to, Holmberg, devoted an entire chapter to the pillar
in his work on Siberian myth.  Plato would not have confused the battle of
Zeus and Typhon as relating to a pillar of light.  He acknowledged this symbol
as the highway for the souls of the dead to reach heaven.
Our Neon World
In other published works, I have argued that an enhanced aurora at the north
and south poles is an inevitable outcome of encounters with great meteoric
showers.  Present auroral displays, sometimes called the Northern Lights, are
the product of periodic solar flares which cause temporary charge imbalances
in the Earth's magnetic field.  When these entrapped charges reach a critical
point, they rush from the trailing end of the tear shaped geomagnetic belt
and cascade down the north and south magnetic poles in a spiral pattern. 
These charged particles become visible as they collide with rising atoms of
oxygen and nitrogen, producing a distinctive belt of glowing gases in the
Earth's upper atmosphere.
The great pillar aurora is most easily understood as an upward extension of
the present auroral oval and its interior polar cap.
The great pillar of the Exodus would be initiated by a discharge from the
Earth's field to the impinging ionized cometary debris.  This" short circuit
would cause the temporary reduction of the Earth's magnetic field, subjecting
the Earth to greater penetration of the solar wind.  The Earth would also lose
some charge from its interior, depending on the relative ionization of the
impinging debris.  These two conditions would lead to overcharging of the
Earth's geomagnetic field, powering great auroras until the Earth regains its
electrical equilibrium.
Auroral Icons
The full range of iconography provided by the great auroras of the past could
fill many volumes, and is dealt with in greater detail in Catastrophism 2000.
  The essential direct image presented to our ancestors was that of a fluted
cylinder composed of the Earth's overcharged field lines, projecting upwards
thousands of kilometres, and made visible at night by rising glowing green
and red gases ionized by the electrons passing through them, and by day by
the iron-bearing dust attracted by the same electromagnetic field lines.  This
effect was demonstrated by P Shoemaker-Levy 9's ferrous dust, aligning itself
along Jupiter's north-south field lines shortly after impact.
The Serpents
Charged particles spiraling down and reflected upwards by the ionosphere
sometimes illuminated the rising atomic oxygen and nitrogen into the single
and double helixes which are equally popular in global iconography.
The leather straps (phylacteries) wound around the left arm by pious Jews
prior to prayer, and the serpent encircling the tree of life, are Hebrew
remembrances of the illuminated spiraling electrons.
The idea is also found in the serpent Moses made of brass, which he put upon a
pole. Velikovsky himself stated: "The brazen serpent was most probably the
image of a pillar of cloud and fire which appeared as a moving serpent to all
people of the world."
The Light of Noga
The influence of Venus is never quite absent in Velikovsky's Exodus narrative,
and this quotation from Isaiah is compelling. "The people that walked in
darkness have seen a great light; they that dwell in the land of the shadow
of death, the light of Noga was upon them."
Velikovsky rightly claims, "It (Noga) is, in fact, the usual name of this
planet in Hebrew, and it is therefore an omission not to translate it so."
This construction can be understood if we acknowledge that the auroral pillar
was one of the effects of passing through the tail of the protoplanet Venus,
a hypothesis that is still compelling today.
Velikovsky's reference to Amos is also convincing. "Amos says that during the
forty years in the wilderness the Israelites did not sacrifice to the Lord,
but carried 'the star of your god, which you made to yourselves.'  St. Jerome
interprets this 'star of your god' as Lucifer (the Morning Star.)"
Do We Need The Nucleus ?
In tearing apart the head and tail of the protoplanet Venus, Velikovsky was
probably on the right track. Perhaps if he had further decoupled the nucleus
and its trailing debris, he could have presented a stronger argument for a
major encounter with a comet's tail during the Exodus and Joshua episodes.
It would not shock any scientist today to suggest that the Exodus and Joshua
events were the result of an encounter with a great meteoric shower.  The
fact that the comet's nucleus was not sighted during the encounters could be
explained simply by imposing a daytime event.  Half of the meteoric showers,
such as the Taurids, are not seen due to sunlight which obscures the classic
radiation of glowing gas and dust that is seen during the nights of great
Leonid and Perseid showers.  It has been claimed recently in Icarus that the
Tsunguska event was the product of this shower.
Enter Shoemaker-Levy 9
At this point we may bring Shoemaker-Levy 9 into the equation.  One of the
greatest difficulties in Velikovsky's Exodus scenario is the significant time
lapse between catastrophes.  Even making allowances for the red world that
preceded the Passover night, there existed six days between the night of the
great flash of light and profound darkness and the events at the Sea of
Passage. Velikovsky's argument that Venus became entangled in the Earth's
orbit, and then returned to display its nucleus-shrouding tail, is not
convincing.  As has been stated earlier, there is no direct evidence of the
presence of either the head or the visible tail of a comet, let alone a
viable model or physical theory to explain the exotic motions necessary to
justify this sophisticated cosmic scenario.  A train of asteroids captured by
the Earth's gravity a la Shoemaker-Levy 9, which took place over a five-day
period, or an angled passage through a single or multiple train of meteoric
showers, is a simpler and familiar explanation.  This  in no way excludes
Venus, Mars nor Super Encke from the parental role.
Creating the Great Aurora
Bringing the pillar of smoke and fire into its proper iconographic niche as
the northern extension of the Axis Mundi and explaining it as a visual
product of an encounter with a great meteoric shower, further confirms
Velikovsky's intuitions concerning the essential nature of the Exodus
catastrophes.  The great wandering, like the night of July 16, 1994, began
with a great flash of light.
I presume that the dazzling light of the Passover night and the flashes of
Shoemaker-Levy 9 were similar occurrences.  The Israelites had good reason to
give only a passing reference to this phenomenon, since they had other things
on their minds, but the Jovian flashes were watched by thousands of human and
electronic eyes from the Earth and sun and Earth-orbiting satellites.  What
they observed and recorded of this unique event not only provides compelling
evidence of the super auroral hypothesis, but brings us closer to a clearer
understanding of the nature of comets.
Looking behind Jupiter
We do not yet fully understand what happened behind Jupiter in July.  The only
satellite in a position to observe the night side of Jupiter was Galileo,
whose great distance from Jupiter could only provide very grainy images of
the 14  explosions.
But the dust marks left on the planet's atmosphere were approximately the
diameter of the Earth.  If the same fragments would have exploded above the
Earth, the effects would most probably have been of a greater scale.  Using
Jupiter as a model for Earth must be carefully qualified. Its magnetic field
is immense. Its magnetopause, if visible, would have the apparent diameter of
the moon.  The pulse of electromagnetic energy released by its moon Io is 10
to the 18th ergs, enough to toast the city of Portland.  On the other side of
the coin, a fragment of several kilometres is, in relative mass, less than a
gnat's breath to this planetary giant whose volume is 1,300 times that of the
Earth.  Nevertheless, Jupiter did not take the onslaught lightly.  Vincent
Caracci, an American amateur radio astronomer, monitored the same band (21.5
Mhz) that produces Jupiter's Io related electrical storms.  He characterized
the energy released by the fragments as sounding like a machine gun compared
to the typical ocean surf sound released by Io.
The University of Florida, which has been monitoring Jupiter's radio signals
since their discovery in the early 1950s, did not rule out "lightning"
discharging from Jupiter's field, but the results must have surprised even
those who expected measurable disturbances in Jupiter's field.  Before the
plume or ball of fire associated with each impact was observed, a flash
hotter than the sun itself was recorded.    What was anomalous and still
unexplained by astronomers was the fact that these flashes were recorded by
observers on both the day and night side of Jupiter.
Galileo, the Earth-orbiting Hubble telescope, and many ground observers
witnessed the flash simultaneously. Another puzzling occurrence was the
absence of reflection from Jupiter's moons and torus.  Hopes that light from
the impacts would be mirrored back to Earthbound observers were dashed when no
observable intensity of light was recorded.  A simple explanation may lie in
recognizing that the flash occurred in Jupiter's magnetosphere and not on the
planet's surface.  The interval of six to eight minutes from flash to the
first sight of the ball of fire gives further support to this thesis.
I would go further and suggest that the explosion of each fragment was caused
by electrical shock.  Evidence is being put forth that the fragments were
solid asteroids.  If this proves true, it will be helpful to find a mechanism
that explains how a solid body, more than two kilometres in diameter, can
explode well above Jupiter's atmosphere.  Finally, can the discharge of fire
from Jupiter's clouds come from the impinging debris, or as part of a general
electrical discharge phenomenon?  If the latter process took place, there
ought to be more than one mark on Jupiter's surface.
This suggested electrical mechanism is not critical to prove the super-Aurora
hypothesis.  It is presented as further evidence that electrical
interactions, and not physical impacts, are key to understanding comets and
their effects on planetary evolution.  In any event the appearance of enhanced
auroras as a direct result of cometary contact is no longer speculative.  A
recent news release from the Goddard Space Flight Centre stated: "HST (Hubble
Space Telescope) detected unusual auroral activity in Jupiter's northern
hemisphere just after the impact of the comet's K fragment.  This impact
completely disrupted the radiation belts which have been stable over the last
20 years of radio observations."
Moreover, evidence that Jupiter has sustained a continuing charge of greater
intensity is being compiled. Imke DePater of the University of California,
Los Angeles will be publishing, in the new year, data registering a 20 to 30
per cent sustained increase in Jupiter's geo-magnetic field.  The mysterious
pillar of Exodus could well have lighted their way through their forty years
of desert wanderings.
More critical to my contention that the mysterious pillar was an auroral
phenomenon was the dynamic effect of the electromagnetic disturbances. 
"Aurorae, glowing gases that create the northern and southern lights, are
common on Jupiter because energetic charged particles needed to excite the
gases are always trapped in Jupiter's magnetosphere.  However, this new
feature seen by Hubble was unusual because it was temporarily as bright or
brighter than the normal aurora, short-lived, and outside the area where
Jovian aurorae are normally found."
Finding Jupiter's aurora displaced is to be expected since this is normal
operating procedure during auroral storms on Earth which can displace Earthly
aurorae as far south as Mexico City.
A similar movement of the mysterious pillar in Exodus was quoted and
interpreted by Velikovsky in Worlds In Collision. "And the Angel of God,
which went before the camp of Israel, removed and went behind them; and the
pillar of the cloud went from before their face and stood behind them ... and
it was a cloud and darkness but it gave light by night.'  An exceedingly
strong wind and lightnings rent the cloud.  In the morning the waters rose as
a wall and moved away.  'And the children of Israel went into the midst of the
sea upon the dry ground."
If the lightning which rent the cloud pillar was a discharge between the Earth
and meteoric debris, are we not then dealing with essentially the same
electromagnetic phenomena witnessed on and around Jupiter?
The aurora created by the flash on the first night of Passover- the same
aurora that the children of Israel followed on northward passage- may have
moved due to a permanent displacement of the Earth's terrestrial axis, as
Velikovsky claimed, or by the more temporary movement witnessed some months
ago on Jupiter. Either explanation is easier to maintain than Velikovsky's
elaborate detached comet tail model.
Conclusion
Intensive aurorae and increased radiation from Jupiter's geomagnetic field
would not be a total surprise to professional Jupiter watchers.  The enormous
energies pulsed to Io could just as easily be short-circuited, in retrospect,
to highly ionized comet fragments.  What is of more significance is that
Jupiter/Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 has struck a fatal blow to Whipple's
characterization of a comet as a dirty snowball.  A close scrutiny of
fragments entering Jupiter's magnetopause and a similar study of ejecta
revealed little or no evidence of water.  The fragments were found to contain
magnesium, a common component of asteroids and dust.  If Jupiter were hit by
a series of solid bodies, what caused them to explode above Jupiter's
atmosphere?  And more importantly, what forces created the clouds dust that
obscured each nucleus?  Present models of comets as conglomerations of ice
and volatiles were conjured up to explain this phenomenon- the "shedding" of
cometary matter at distances well beyond any heat contribution from the sun. 
If comet shedding proves to be a product of electromagnetic forces, it will
introduce a new dimension in our understanding of the way our universe
evolves.
 W. Phythian-Adams, The Call of Israel, in Worlds In Collision, Immanuel
Velikovsky (Garden City: Doubleday & Company, 1950), p. 81.
 Immanuel Velikovsky, Worlds In Collision  (Garden City: Doubleday & Company),
p.
 Velikovsky, op. cit., pp. 173-174.
 Velikovsky, op. cit., p. 184.
 Louis Ginzberg, The Legends Of The Jews (Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication
Society Of America), Volume II, p. 375.
 Milton Zysman, "Let There Be Lights," in Catastrophism 2000, ed. Milton
Zysman and Clark Whelton (Toronto: Heretic Press, 1990), pp. 143-198.
 Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, International Astronomical Union,
Circular No. 6036.
 Velikovsky, op. cit., p. 184.
 Velikovsky, op. cit., p. 175.
 Velikovsky, op. cit., p. 175.
 Velikovsky, op. cit., p. 176.
 Jack B. Hartung, "Giordano Bruno, the June 1975 Meteoroid Storm, Encke, and
Other Taurid Complex Objects," in Icarus 104, pp. 280-290.
 Public Information Office, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
Technology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Galileo Comet
Shoemaker-Levy Observations, 10/31/94.
 Hubble Discoveries 94-161.
 Hubble Discoveries 94-161.
 Velikovsky, op. cit., pp. 85-86.
FROM: http://www.kronia.com/symposium/zysman.txt   | 
    
      | ANOTHER VELIKOVSKY OPINION 
      Dr. 
      Velikovsky brought with him to America an unfinished book on Freud and His 
      Heroes. In the study of Moses and Ikhnaton in preparation for this work, 
      he came upon the idea that great physical catastrophes might be used to 
      synchronize the the records of the ancient peoples of the Near East, and 
      before the end of 1940 the main outlines of his work were clear. It is so 
      far composed of Worlds in Collision, a natural history of the world 
      catastrophes, and of two further volumes called Ages in Chaos. The latter 
      (completed first though they will be published second) contain the 
      elaborately documented rewriting of ancient history assumed in Worlds in 
      Collision. "I ask a credence of the reader," says Dr. Velikovsky, "that he 
      allow me to use this chronology until Ages in Chaos is published." He has 
      been working on both books concurrently for the past nine years. 
       
      Professor 
      Horace M. Kallen, former dean of the New School For Social Research, was 
      among the first to read the manuscript of Worlds in Collision. "Even if I 
      thought that Velikovsky's theories were entirely ungrounded," writes 
      Professor Kallen of Velikovsky's historical and archaeological work, "I 
      would treat them as an extraordinary achievement of the scientific and 
      historical imgination....But it is myt belief that Velikovsky has 
      supported his thesis with substantial evidence and made an effective and 
      persuasive argument." Gordon A. Atwater, curator of the Hayden 
      Planetarium, wrote to the Macmillan Company that, "the theories presented 
      by Dr. Velikovsky are unique and should be presented to the world of 
      science in order that the underpinning of modern science can be 
      re-examined....I believe the author has done an outstanding job. In fact, 
      he has gone beyond what normally be expected of a single individual." 
      II.The comet, at the first of the two meetings reconstructed in Worlds in 
      Collision, touched the earth with its gaseous tail, and one of the first 
      signs of the encounter was a rain of fine, rusty pigment. The world turned 
      red. “All the waters that were in the river,” reads the Book of Exodus, 
      “were turned to blood.” The Manuscript Quiche’ of the Mayas tells of the 
      rivers turning to blood, and so does the Papyrus Ipuwer of the Egyptians. 
      Then, as the story continues in the Visuddhi-Magga of the Buddhists, the 
      fine dust turned to coarse dust, “and then fine sand, and then coarse 
      sand, and then grit, stones, up to boulders as large... as mighty trees on 
      the hilltops.”
 
      And with the 
      shower of meteorites the earth stopped turning. 
      It came to 
      rest so faced to the sun that a long night, darkened by the cosmic refuse 
      sweeping in from interplanetary space, fell on Europe, Africa, the 
      Americas, and the valleys of the Euphrates and the Indus. The Babylonians, 
      the tribes of the Sudan, the Finns, the Greeks, the Peruvians, and the 
      American Indians all have traditions of a long night accompanying a 
      catastrophe which the earth did not survive. Further east, the Iranians 
      saw the sun suspended several days in the sky. In china, it is said that 
      in the reign of the Emperor Yahou the sun did not set for a number of days 
      and all the forests burned.We suppose that if the earth stopped turning it would destroy itself, as 
      HG Wells imagined it would when his “man who could work miracles” 
      commanded the same act. Our idea of momentum - and the Law of Gravitation, 
      about which Dr. Velikovsky has much to say - leads us to assume that the 
      earth’s surface would fly onward in the direction of its rotation and be 
      torn apart. A great global catastrophe, with seas and continents changing 
      their places,is in fact described in the traditions of mankind. The world 
      gave every sign to its inhabitants of being on the brink of destruction.
 
      Approached by 
      the body of the comet, the earth was forced out of its regular motion; a 
      major shock convulsed its entire surface. The major shift in the 
      atmosphere caused by the approach of the comet and the stasis of the 
      planet, itself produced hurricanes of enormous velocity and force. “The 
      face of the earth changed,” writes Dr. Velikovsky, summarizing the Mayan 
      account from the Manuscript Troano, “mountains collapsed, other mountains 
      grew and rose over the onrushing cataract of water driven from the oceanic 
      spaces, numberless rivers lost their beds, and a wild tornado moved 
      through the debris descending from the sky.” 
      The human 
      population was decimated and many species of animals perished entirely. 
      The surface of the earth burst. Three Mexican manuscripts tell how 
      everywhere in the Western hemisphere new mountains came into being. New 
      volcanos opened and fissures in the flat land threw forth fire and smoke 
      and liquid basalt. The rivers steamed and the sea boiled. The Zendi-Avesta 
      of the Persians says that a star made the sea boil. The Polynesians say 
      that a star caused new islands to appear. 
      It was the 
      tenth plague of Egypt, the night of Passover, when the Lord passed over 
      the huts of the Israelites and struck the mansions of the Egyptians (the 
      light rush houses would survive and earthquake more easily than heavy 
      stone ones). “There was not a house where there was not one dead,” says 
      the Book of Exodus, and St. Jerome wrote that “in the night in which 
      Exodus took place, all the temples of Egypt were destroyed either by an 
      earth shock or by the thunderbolt.” The head of the comet cam close to the 
      earth, breaking through the darkness of the dust cloud, and the Hebrew 
      tradition tells that the last night of the Jews in Egypt was as bright as 
      the noon of the summer solstice. 
      The blow fell 
      at midnight. Dr. Velikovsky observes in passing that as the israelites 
      counted the days from sunset it was for them the 14th Aviv; and, ever 
      since, the Passover has been celebrated on the fourteenth day of the first 
      month of spring. The Egyptians counted from sunrise, as we do, and for 
      them it was the 13th Thout, a day forever after unlucky. As for the 
      thirteenth of any month, said the Egyptians, “thou shalt not do anything 
      on this day.” The Aztecs also counted the day from sunrise, and in their 
      calendar it was noted that on the 13th Olin, a month called “earthquake,” 
      a new world age had come into being. 
      When a comet 
      encounters a planet, it may become entangled and drawn from its path, then 
      forced into a new orbit, and finally liberated. This is what happened to 
      Lexell’s comet, which was captured by Jupiter and its moons in 1767 and 
      did not free itself until 1779. Some form of balance between attraction 
      and inertia was maintained for twelve years; Jupiter and the comet did not 
      crash together. Neither, according to Dr. Velikovsky’s thesis, did the 
      earth and the comet that came near it in 1500 b.c. They exchanged 
      discharges of electrical potential.  
      The action of 
      the sun and the moon on the earth produces the ocean tides. If the earth 
      were to slow down, the seas would first recede toward the poles; but the 
      attraction of a large comet close to the earth would draw them back toward 
      itself and heap them high in the air. The story of the seas divided and 
      then rising to break over the land is widespread. The Choctaw Indians say 
      that when the land was in darkness a bright light appeared in the north, 
      “but it was mountain-high waves, coming nearer”; the Peruvians say that 
      the ocean left the shore and inundated the continent; the Chinese annals 
      say that in the reign of the Emperor Yahou a great tidal wave broke over 
      the mountains into the Chinese Empire and flooded the land for decades. 
      The tides 
      carried huge rocks along them. For instance, the Madison Boulder, near 
      Conway, New Hampshire, is a ten-thousand-ton piece of granite quite 
      different from the bedrock beneath it. An early nineteenth century 
      explanation of this and other “erratic” boulders was that great tidal 
      waves, originating in the north, must have swept the rocks and geologic 
      till (clay, mud and gravel) across the land. According to the calculations 
      based on the amount erosion under them, the boulders were deposited in 
      their places less than six thousand years ago. It has been assumed that 
      the stones were drawn along by the glacial ice sheet, but the disquieting 
      fact is that accumulations of rock were moved from lower latitudes to 
      higher latitudes - and even uphill toward the Himalaya, through the 
      existing glaciers push stones down, not up, the slopes. 
      At the Sea of 
      the Passage the Israelite tribes saw the water drawn aside and heaped up 
      in a double tide; and, after they crossed, the waters of the Mediterranean 
      fell and broke into the Red Sea ina great wave. “It was an unusual event,” 
      writes Dr. Velikovsky, “and because it was unusual it became the most 
      impressive recollection in the long history of this people. All peoples 
      and nations were blasted by the same fire and shattered in the same fury. 
      The tribes of Israel on the shore of a sea found in this annihilation 
      their salvation from bondage. They escaped destruction but their 
      oppressors perished before their eyes. They extolled their Creator, took 
      upon themselves the burden of moral rules, and considered themselves 
      chosen for a great destiny.” 
      Here is what 
      Dr. Velikovsky’s description of the pageant that took place in the sky:When the tidal waves reached their highest point, and the seas were torn 
      apart,
 a tremendous spark flew between the earth and the globe of the comet, 
      which
 instantly pushed down the miles-high billows. Meanwhile, the tail of the 
      comet and
 its head, having become entangled with each other by their close contact 
      with the
 earth, exchanged violent discharges of electricity. It looked like a 
      battle between
 the brilliant globe and the dark column of smoke. In the exchange of 
      electrical
 potentials, the tail and the head were attracted one to the other and 
      repelled one
 from the other. From the serpent like tail extensions grew, and it lost 
      the form of a
 column. It now looked like a furious animal with legs and many heads. The 
      discharges
 tore the column to pieces, a process that was accompanied by the brilliant 
      globe
 buried in the sea, or wherever the meteorites fell. The gases of the tail 
      subsequently
 enveloped the earth.
 
      To the peoples 
      of the earth below who witnessed this spectacle, the head of the comet and 
      its tail seemed to be two separate bodies, The bright globe fought the 
      “crooked serpent” and destroyed it, thus saving the world from further 
      harm. It would be difficult, Dr. Velikovsky writes, “to find a people or a 
      tribe on earth that does not have the same motif at the very focus of its 
      religious beliefs.” The great spark that flew between the comet and Earth 
      is remembered as the bolt of lightning, placed in the hand of a god who 
      threw this thunderbolt at a world overwhelmed by water and fire: Zeus of 
      the Greeks, Odin of the Icelanders, Ukko of the Finns, Wotan of the 
      Germans, Mazda of the Persians, Marduk of the Babylonians, Siva of the 
      Hindus. The pattern of conflict between the comet and its tail takes 
      almost identical form in the battles of Zeus with Typhon, Isis with Seth, 
      Vishnu with the Serpent, Indra with Rahu, marduk with Tiamat, Ormuzd with 
      Ahriman. “A terrible comet was seen by the people of Ethiopia and Egypt,” 
      wrote Pliny in his Natural History, “to which Typhon , the king of that 
      period gave his name; it had a fiery appearance and was twisted like a 
      coil, and it was very grim to behold; it was not really a star so much as 
      what might be called a ball of fire.” 
      The earth was 
      wrapped for decades in the gases of the comet and the dust of exploding 
      volcanoes. No green thing could grow. The chinese called this time the 
      Valley of Obscurity and the Somber Residence; the Nordics called it the 
      Twilight of the Gods. According to the Annals of Cuauhtitlan there was 
      darkness in Mexico for twenty-five years. The American Indians say that it 
      was not until the fifteenth year that plants would bloom. And for the 
      Hebrew tribes, who had been led out of bondage by the pillar of smoke by 
      day and of fire by night, this was the Shadow of Death. 
      How did 
      mankind live when nothing grew? The tail of a comet is composed of carbon 
      and hydrogen gases, and these elements were in suspension in the earth’s 
      atmosphere after the comet departed. The Hindu Vedas, the egyptian papyri, 
      and the Hebrew legends say that the wind smelled sweet, and eventually the 
      carbohydrates combining in the air precipitated. mankind fed on morning 
      dew, say the Icelandic traditions, and the Vedas tell of the honey-lash 
      falling - as the Greeks say ambrosia all fell - from the clouds. Where the 
      honey-frost fell on the waters, it turned them milky and sweet. Ovid, the 
      Vedas, and the Egyptians say the rivers flowed with milk and honey. The 
      precipitate also fell among the Israelites, they called it Manna. 
      III.The astronomical records of the ancient past raise perplexing issues. A 
      scholar who examined the computations of the longest and shortest shadows 
      observed at noontime in China about 1100 B.C. remarked that “they do not 
      really represent the true lengths.” The Hindu astronomical tables compiled 
      by the Brahmans show a uniform error of 21 degrees 46’. The astronomical 
      tablets of of Babylon of the eighth century B.C. present three different 
      schedules of planetary motion. The Venus Tables of Babylon, excavated by 
      Sir henry Layard from the ruins of the library of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh, 
      show an irregular behavior of the planet Venus that differs from modern 
      observations not by minutes but by weeks and months. The water clock of 
      the Amon Temple of Karnak is consistently inaccurate for day and night, at 
      any season, in the latitudes of Egypt. The shadow clock found at Fayum, 
      Egypt, originating in the eight century B.C., will not show time correctly 
      at Fayum or anywhere else in Egypt. And in the tomb of Senmut, the 
      architect of Queen Hatshepsut of Egypt, there is an astronomical panel in 
      the ceiling which refers to an earlier period; it is completely reversed 
      and shows Orion Sirius group proceeding in the wrong direction.
 
      Dr. Velikovsky 
      presents historical evidence that these ancient records were not incorrect 
      at the time when they were made. Astronomers will find this particular 
      suggestion difficult to take, as the calculations of contemporary 
      astronomy are precise and the play of mechanical forces on which they are 
      based has been well understood for over two hundred years. Celestial 
      mechanics, in fact, is one of the few sciences that has not been rudely 
      disturbed by the discoveries of the past century, for the behavior of the 
      solar system can be predicted so accurately on mechanical principles that 
      no one has been able to replace them by another. Even with the tiny 
      discrepancies which need the modification of the Theory of Relativity, the 
      planets follow the immutable Law of Gravitation. They roll on and on, but 
      only because the primevil inertia implanted within them. 
      Dr. Velikovsky 
      willingly conceded that the behavior of the earth and the comet in his 
      description is not in accord with the celestial mechanics of Newton. 
      Indeed, it invites skepticism as to the infallibility of the law of 
      Gravitation, a law heretofore so firmly established that it has never been 
      successfully combined into one system with the laws of electromagnetics. 
      It is Dr. Velikovsky’s contention that over three thousand years ago 
      Nature performed a great experiment, in which it was demonstrated that the 
      electromagnetic laws are as supreme in the heavens as they are inside the 
      atom.Niels Bohr was one of the first to compare the atom with the sun and the 
      planets. The nucleus is like the sun, and the electrons are like the 
      planets - but in applying the quantum theory to the atom it was found that 
      things happen inside it that are not supposed to happen in the solar 
      system. John J. O’Neill, science editor of the New york Herald Tribune, 
      has written this description of the atom’s peculiarities:
 
      In the atom, 
      electrons revolve around the nucleus of the atom in a quiet,orderly, orbital, rotation, just like the earth moving around the sun, and 
      may
 go through billions of rotations, or atomic years, without any major 
      changes
 taking place. Suddenly the atom emits a quantum of energy, and [an] 
      electron
 drops to an orbit nearer the nucleus, where its “year” is shorter, or the 
      reverse
 may happen: a quantum of energy is absorbed by the atom, and [an] electron
 jumps to a higher, or outer orbit, where its year is longer.
 
      In the same 
      article from which this quotation is taken, Mr. O’Neill discussed the 
      probable impact of Dr. Velikovsky’s research on the comfortable assumption 
      that the planets and the jumping electron have nothing gin common. “Dr. 
      Velikovsky finds evidence for new planets appearing in the sky,” wrote Mr. 
      O’Neill, “and for the earth being struck by and passing through tails of 
      comets.... [His work] presents a stupendous panorama of terrestrial and 
      human history which will stand as a challenge to scientists to frame a 
      realistic picture of the cosmos.  
      A charged body 
      which rotates creates a magnetic field. The sun is a charged body, and it 
      rotates, and charged particles arrive from it in a continuous stream. The 
      earth is a charged body, and it rotates, and it possesses a magnetic 
      field. If the magnetic field of the sun were to govern the earth’s motion, 
      then after an encounter with a comet the earth could resume its rotation, 
      though on a changed orbit. If it is true that the comet and the earth 
      exchanged electrical discharges, as Dr. Velikovsky maintains that they 
      did, then there may be even reason to suppose that the earth’s “inertia” 
      is electrical in character. How do we know that the earth and the planets 
      are so different from the electrons inside the atom. The answer has been 
      phrased thus: “We do not read in the morning paper that Saturn and Mars 
      have changed their places.” But we do read in the ancient records, says 
      Dr. Velikovsky, that Venus, mars, and Earth have changed theirs. 
      Venus is the 
      Morning and the Evening Star. It is the most conspicuous of the planets. 
      Early astronomers observed its motion with great care, and the Mexicans 
      computed the day when they thought the world would end by a cycle of 
      fifty-two years based on Venus. So bright is Venus in the sky, in fact, 
      that it is most remarkable to fin no record of its existence prior to the 
      second millennium B.C. 
      Early 
      Babylonian astronomy counted four planets and four only - Saturn, Jupiter, 
      Mars, and Mercury. In the Hindu table of the planets attributed to 3012 
      B.C., Venus alone is missing, and it is said that the Brahmans “never 
      mentioned five planets.” Later Venus is called “the great star that joins 
      the other great stars” by the Babylonians. In all traditions the Morning 
      Star is described as having a special birth, an event of great 
      significance to the Tahitians, the Eskimos, and the Buriats, the Kirghiz, 
      and the Yakuts of Siberia, as well as to more sophisticated peoples. 
      Hesiod said the Phaeton, whose name means blazing star, drove the chariot 
      of the sun too close to the earth, disturbing its rotation and was later 
      changed into the Morning Star. The Chinese tell of a “brilliant Star” that 
      appeared in the region of Yahou, and a Samaritan chronicle says that 
      during the invasion of palestine by Joshua “a star arose out of the east 
      against which all magic is in vain.” At the time of great catastrophes, 
      Quetzalcoatl, the Venus of the Mayans, appeared in the sky for the first 
      time. And the Chaldeans and the Chinese are in agreement that Venus 
      “rivaled the sun in brightness.” 
      Dr. Velikovsky 
      brings strong evidence to bear that the comet which so terrorized the 
      earth was in fact the planet Venus - newly born, by eruption from a larger 
      planet. While is was still a comet, Venus wandered erratically, which is 
      why its course was so closely watched, why the Venus Tablets of Nineveh do 
      not seem to make sense, and why the appearance of a comet has always 
      aroused premonitions of disaster everywhere in the world. The dreaded 
      comet Venus that was later to become a planet had many names -- Tistrya, 
      Ishtar, Astarte, Isis, Baal, Beelzebub, Lucifer. Often it was confused 
      with Jupiter (Isis in Egypt and Ishtar in Babylon were first names for 
      Venus), for Jupiter was the planet from which Venus erupted as a planet.
       
      Student of 
      Greek and Roman mythology may object that according to legend it was 
      Pallas Athene, or Minerva, who “sprang full grown from the brow of 
      Jupiter.” The classical scholar may wonder, however, why Greek mythology 
      contains no deity for the planet Venus and no planet for the deity Pallas 
      Athene. The Greek equivalent of the Roman “Venus” was Aphrodite, who was 
      identified with the Moon. The answer, once known but long forgotten, is 
      that Pallas Athene was the Greek name for the planet Venus. (Plutarch said 
      that Minerva of the Romans and Athene of the Greeks were the same as Isis 
      of the Egyptians; Pliny said that Isis was the planet Venus.) The birth of 
      Pallas Athene was “a day of wrath in all the calendars of ancient 
      Chaldea.” During the birth of Athene, described in a Homeric hymn, the 
      earth reeled and the sun stopped for a “long while”. 
      For many 
      centuries the inhabitants of the earth were in such fear of Venus that 
      human sacrifice was practiced in both hemispheres in the hope of placating 
      its wrath. The Mexicans were so profoundly affected by the fifty-two year 
      interval between Venus’ two encounters with the earth the they adopted the 
      period in their calendar and made bloody sacrifices to Quetzalcoatl - the 
      feathered serpent” who was identified with the Morning Star - when 
      fifty-two years passed without harm. The years of terror lasted until the 
      seventh century B.C. Venus, as the result of an encounter with another 
      body, took up its present orbit and changed from a wild comet to a tame 
      planet. Venus’ flirtation with another planet - that is, with Mars -- is a 
      common theme in mythology. This meeting, a battle of Athene with the God 
      of War, is described in the lliad, a conflict in the heavens which took 
      place at the same time as the siege of Troy, “It is the conjunction of 
      venus and Mars,” wrote Kucien, “that created the poetry of Homer. 
      The encounter 
      between Venus and Mars disturbed Mars’ orbit, and at intervals of fifteen 
      years Mars also passed close to the earth. On two days in particular - 
      February 26, 747 B.C. and March 23, 687 B.C. - Mars caused a repetition of 
      the earlier catastrophes on a smaller scale. In the year 747 B.C. a new 
      calendar was introduced in the Middle East. It began on the 26th of 
      February, and in the calendar of Mexico the 26th of February was also 
      counted as New Year’s Day. It is during this period that the worship of 
      Mars came into prominence among peoples whose institutions were not fully 
      formed. The Romans had a vigorous cult of mars and regarded Mars as their 
      national god, the founder of their state, and father of Romulus. The chief 
      celebration of the Roams mars cult was on the 23rd of March. On the night 
      of the 23rd of March, 687 B.C., the army of Sennacherib, the Assyrian king 
      who invaded Palestine, was destroyed by a blast of fire from the sky. “On 
      the 23rd of March, 687 B.C.,” wrote Edouard Biot in his catalogue of the 
      meteors which were observed in ancient China, the fixed stars were not 
      visible but, “in the middle of the night stars fell like rain.” 
      The battle 
      between Venus and Mars ended with Venus, shorn of its power to disturb 
      humankind, rotating on the the serene orbit it now occupies. Venus seemed 
      to have fallen from its earlier eminence. This was the period of the 
      Hebrew Prophets, men of astronomical skill who from watchtowers built in 
      Judea, as elsewhere in the East (“Watchman, what of the night?”) recorded 
      and predicted Mars’ fifteen-year approach to the earth and warned the 
      people and their kings of coming catastrophes. After an upheaval that took 
      place in the eighth century B.C., “Isaiah, Joel, Hosea, and Micah insisted 
      unanimously and with great emphasis on the inevitability of another 
      encounter of the earth with some cosmic body.” Their prophecies were 
      fulfilled on the days when Mars came close to the earth and moved it from 
      its place. 
      Finally they 
      observed that a hated enemy - Beelzebub, the Morning Star, who had 
      provoked pagan worship - was no longer powerful. Venus, which had 
      “weakened the nations” and had tried to ascend on high, was cut down to 
      the ground. “How art thou fallen from heaven,” wrote Isaiah, “Oh Lucifer, 
      son of the morning.” 
      IV.The history of the calendar is often used to exhibit the conquest of 
      ignorance. Gradually the errors seem to have been removed from its first 
      primitive efforts to codify time, until now we pride ourselves on a system 
      that closely approximates the actual movements of the earth and its moon. 
      Yet it is curious that the ancients should have used such hopelessly 
      inaccurate calendars when their measurements of celestial motion were so 
      carefully made. The Mexicans knew that the synodical moon period consists 
      of 29.5209 days, a computation more exact than that of the Gregorian 
      calendar, which was not introduced into Europe until long after America 
      was discovered.
 
      The 
      introduction of a new calendar in 747 B.C. indicates to Dr. velikovsky 
      that the orbit of the earth - the length of the year, the months, and the 
      seasons - had actually changed. Previous to this time the Chinese, the 
      Hindus, the persians, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Israelites, the 
      Egyptians, the Romans,and the Mayans all used a calendar of twelve 
      lunations of thirty days each, a year of 360 days. During the period of 
      Mars’ meetings with the earth, the length of the seasons changed 
      repeatedly, but at some time during the seventh century B.C. all these 
      nations add five days to their calendars. The Persians called the five 
      days Gatha days, the Egyptians' called them “the days which are above the 
      year”, and the Mayans called them the “days without a name”. If the 
      earlier calendars were merely mistakes, then in a man’s lifetime and error 
      would have accumulated of an entire year, a dislocation in harvest cycles 
      which could not have been ignored even in the most primitive of 
      agricultural societies. 
      But more than 
      the development of the calendar hangs on the assumption we make today: 
      that the earth has rotated through millions of uninterrupted years, each 
      consisting of 365 days, 5 hours and 48 minutes. Philosophy, science, 
      religion - there is scarcely an area of knowledge or conviction 
      invulnerable to Dr. Velikovsky’s detailed and documented denial that the 
      earth’s history has been one of peaceful evolution. The long erosions of 
      wind and rain, the slow buckling and folding of sedimented rock, and the 
      infinitely graduated series of the developing species have hitherto 
      provided a background of certainty. Now these orderly images have been 
      challenged, and in their place a scholar has offered a basis of evidence 
      for the astonishing pattern of catastrophe implicit in the world 
      traditions. “If Velikovsky’s thesis should withstand the test of time and 
      become generally accepted,” Clifton Fadiman writes, “revolutionary 
      consequences ensue; and prevailing views in a dozen fields - including 
      evolution, mythology, gravitation, and particularly classical and Biblical 
      history - will have to be radically revised”. 
      “Collective 
      amnesia” is the phrase Dr. Velikovsky uses to describe the “psychological 
      phenomenon ...[in which] the most terrifying events of the past may be 
      forgotten or displaced into the subconscious mind,” obscuring the real 
      meaning of many archaeological discoveries and historical texts. Trained 
      in psychoanalysis as well as in history, he is aware of the parallel 
      between the reconstruction of buried events from the past of an individual 
      and his own effort to bring to light the shattering experiences that 
      affected all mankind. 
      In view of the 
      cosmic upheavals of the past, our own time of trouble is dwarfed. There is 
      also a hidden purpose in Dr. Velikovsky's book, a warning to the world 
      that threatens to explode with hatred among the nations: the cosmic 
      catastrophes may repeat themselves. “This world will be destroyed;” reads 
      a passage from the Visuddhi-Magga which serves as motto for his final 
      chapter, “also the mighty ocean will dry up; and this broad earth will be 
      burned up. Therefore, sirs, cultivate friendliness; cultivate compassion.” 
      Bringing to 
      this perspective all the apparatus of learning - from astronomy and 
      physics to folklore, religion, geology, paleontology, biology and 
      psychology - Dr. Velikovsky has undertaken the awesome task of making an 
      “inquiry in the architectonics of the world and its history” and of 
      applying the techniques of scholarship and psychoanalysis to the entire 
      human race.  FROM: 
      
      http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/secret/velikovsky.html   | 
    
      | Crustal Poleshifts: Hapgood and 
                      Bowles    Charles Hapgood (1904-1982)
                        After graduating from Harvard, 
                        Charles Hapgood taught history at Keene State College in 
                        New Hampshire. In 1949 one of his students asked about 
                        Atlantis, and he transformed the query into a research 
                        project, questioning the gradualist rules of geology and 
                        seeking evidence of a catastrophe large enough to 
                        destroy the fabled land. For 10 years, aided by his 
                        eager students, Hapgood worked on his theory of earth 
                        crust displacement - an update of Hugh Auchincloss 
                        Brown's theory that the entire planet has previously 
                        capsized. Brown's theory simply stated that as the 
                        Antarctic polar ice cap gains weight
                        
                        [9], the planet becomes less stable, eventually 
                        becomes unbalanced and topples over. The relative 
                        weights are more akin to a speck of dust on an 
                        automobile tyre than anything more serious - the 
                        Antarctic icecap weighs less than one millionth of the 
                        entire planet. Hapgood doubted that an accumulation of 
                        ice at the poles was enough to tip the entire planet 
                        over. He believed that only the crust shifted. Crustal displacement, from Hapgood's 
                        point of view, is a very violent and sudden shifting of 
                        only the "skin" of the planet Earth (the crust's 
                        thickness is only 0.005% of the equatorial diameter). 
                        This shift causes various disasters, with each disaster 
                        triggering another, and so on. Hapgood suggested that 
                        each Ice Age would not affect the whole earth at the 
                        same time, but only two regions of it - those that 
                        shifted into polar regions. 
                         If it were only 
                        the skin that shifted, as Hapgood proposed, then the ice 
                        cap mechanism becomes more likely. However I do wonder 
                        whether this process could be infinitely repeatable, for 
                        if the poles ever ended up in oceanic areas, then 
                        sufficient ice would never be able to accumulate. In 1958 an in depth explanation was 
                        published in his book titled Earth's Shifting Crust, 
                        with its endorsement by Albert Einstein. Perhaps his 
                        ideas were just too radical for, despite the 
                        endorsement, and although he managed to avoid the 
                        ridicule previously allocated to Velikovsky, academics 
                        and the public alike ignored his book.  Undaunted by this lack of acclaim, he 
                        continued to work on his theory, with a major update 
                        being published in 1970, re-named The Path of 
                        the Pole. Helped by recent advances in geology, 
                        Hapgood replaced the ice cap mechanism with a trigger 
                        coming from within the Earth itself. Although he was 
                        unsure precisely what that trigger was, it was most 
                        likely something involving gravitational imbalances and 
                        centrifugal forces. In the introduction he wrote: 
                          "Polar wandering is based on the 
                          idea that the outer shell of the earth shifts about 
                          from time to time, moving some continents toward and 
                          others away from the poles, changing their climates. 
                          Continental drift is based on the idea that the 
                          continents move individually... A few writers have 
                          suggested that perhaps continental drift causes polar 
                          wandering. This book advances the notion that polar 
                          wandering is primary and causes the displacement of 
                          continents.... This book will present evidence that 
                          the last shift of the earth's crust (the lithosphere) 
                          took place in recent time, at the close of the last 
                          ice age, and that it was the cause of the improvement 
                          in climate."[10] Hapgood suggested three previous 
                        locations of the poles. The most recent North Pole is 
                        Hudson Bay, which was the epicentre of the North 
                        American ice sheet during the last Ice Age. The previous 
                        sites were in the Greenland Sea, and the Yukon district 
                        of Canada, although his evidence for these is totally 
                        dependant on radio-carbon dating.[11] 
                        Each shift was approximately 30°. These diagrams show 
                        where the previous North Poles were located, with their 
                        corresponding equators: 
                          
                            | 
                              Yukon 
                              
                              Greenland 
                              Sea 
                              
                              Hudson 
                              Bay 
                              
                              Present 
                              Pole  | 
                            
                             |  
                            
                            1. Yukon |  
                            |  
                            
                            2. 
                            Greenland Sea |  
                            
                            3. Hudson 
                            Bay |  Interestingly, the Amazon jungle has 
                        remained at the equator during each of these shifts, 
                        which may account for its enormity.
 
 
                          
                            |  | James Bowles |  James Bowles is a retired civil 
                        engineer who worked for NASA sub-contractors on the 
                        Apollo moon program. In his book The Gods, Gemini, 
                        and the Great Pyramid, gives us a straightforward, 
                        easy to grasp theory on how the crust can shift. 
                        
                         
                          On the day of the pig roast 
                          everything was ready. The spit mechanism was in place, 
                          the pit had been dug, there were all kinds of 
                          charcoal, and all the guests were milling about. All 
                          we needed to start the festivities was the pig and a 
                          match. So my dear wife, along with Bonny, led us into 
                          the bathroom where the pig was laying covered with ice 
                          in the bathtub. But one look at the pig and I knew we 
                          were in trouble! . I'd figured on a fifty pound pig, 
                          because that's what we'd talked about, but this had to 
                          be 100 pounds if it was an ounce.. Well now that 
                          one and a half inch of galvanized water pipe looked 
                          like a tooth pick next to the pig, but it was too late 
                          to do anything about it at this point, besides 
                          somebody had lit the charcoal.. Half way through the 
                          night, the pipe broke, and the pig fell into the 
                          fire.. Well to make a long story short, a friend of 
                          mine and I went into town and got a bigger pipe from 
                          behind the garage and put everything back together 
                          again.[11a]
                           
                          
                            
                              | The Spit 
                              Mechanism |  |  
 The point is that the pipe didn't 
                        just break, it broke from fatigue.  This is torque, forces created by 
                        rotation. Bowles calls it Rotational-Bending, or the RB-Effect. 
                        If enough tension is happening within our planet, and it 
                        is constant, then one day something must give, slip or 
                        break. Everything that suffers stress will eventually 
                        crack. In our planet's case it would be the semi-plastic 
                        attachment of the crust to the asthenosphere. The stress 
                        would also create heat, and this could be a simple 
                        explanation for volcanoes - an outlet valve for all the 
                        heat created by the stresses within the earth. Bowles 
                        points out that an easy way to break a piece of wire is 
                        to bend it backwards and forwards, over and over, until 
                        it snaps. The ends of the broken wire will be quite hot 
                        - heat being a by-product of stress. Bowles uses the analogy of cargo on a 
                        ship to further clarify his idea: When cargo is tied 
                        securely, it will ride with the ship and not come to any 
                        harm. But if the ropes are loose, and the cargo slips 
                        and slides, then damage can occur.  The earth's crust is not securely 
                        tied; rather it is connected to the core via a series of 
                        semi-plastic layers, some of which are seas of molten 
                        rock and liquid iron. The waves in the cargo analogy 
                        correspond to the gravitational pulls of the moon, sun 
                        and (to a much lesser extent) the other planets. Our 
                        situation is that we have a crust that is 99.9% securely 
                        tied to the planet's core. The sun and moon are 
                        constantly tugging away, testing the attachment. 
                        Eventually something has to give. The centrifugal forces try to shift 
                        matter towards the equator. This is where the stress is. 
                        We talk about a pole shift, but technically it's the 
                        entire crust that shifts, around two fulcrum points, due 
                        to stresses towards the equator. I came across a science 
                        Q&A website run by NASA, and found questions regarding 
                        the number of earthquakes in Antarctica. Here are the 
                        expert's answers: 
                          Antarctica is unusual in that there 
                          are very few earthquakes there. Of all the seven or 
                          nine continents, or of all the 7 or 25 plates 
                          (depending on how you count), it has the fewest 
                          earthquakes, and it has none of the big, damaging 
                          kind.There are very few earthquakes in Antarctica. It 
                          is one of the questions we are trying to answer out 
                          there. There are numbers of plate boundaries and we 
                          have always been astonished that we haven't seen more 
                          earthquakes. We have wanted to see them, we have tried 
                          to record them, but Antarctica is a real puzzle 
                          because there are very few earthquakes. There should 
                          be many more considering the type of plate boundaries 
                          there are, and the type of continental structures 
                          there are, but there aren't that many. We are trying 
                          to work it out. But now it is still a puzzle. 
                          
                            |  |  
                            | The polar regions 
                            of this globe are unaffected by the forces at work, 
                            hence very few earthquakes. |  It is a puzzle if the standard 
                        continental drift model remains in use. The R-B Effect 
                        theory of Bowles declares that the closer to the equator 
                        you get, the more earthquakes there are, due to the 
                        forces of tension and compression.  When I went to high school, I was 
                        shown a trick that fascinated me. Firstly, you wedge a 
                        ballpoint pen into your desk somehow. Then you get the 
                        spring from inside a broken pen, and you stretch it out. 
                        Using this wire like a two person wood saw, you cut 
                        through the bottom of the pen's clip, and saw right 
                        through to the top of the pen. It has to be done fast. 
                        This action cuts the plastic, but friction creates heat 
                        and causes the plastic to melt together again, just 
                        behind the cutting action. The result is a pen with a 
                        surgical scar where the clip joins. I figure this is 
                        what happens to the earth when the crust slips - it 
                        breaks away, and then cements itself in place again. In recent times 
                        orthodox scientists are re-assessing our planet's 
                        internal mechanics, and have finally started to accept 
                        pole shifts as a possibility: July 
                        1996: 
                        Scientists at Columbia University in New York
                        confirmed that the earth's 
                        inner core was spinning faster than the planet 
                        itself, by approximately 1/3 
                        of a second per day, allowing it to lap the 
                        Earth's surface approximately once every 400 years. This 
                        may help explain Earth's magnetic fields, and why they 
                        periodically reverse. 1997: 
                        Researchers at the California Institute of Technology 
                        reported that an evolutionary big bang, with relative 
                        evolutionary rates of more than 20 times normal, 
                        coincided with another apparently unique event in earth 
                        history; a 90-degree change in the direction of Earth's 
                        spin axis relative to the continents. The poleshift 
                        began about 530 million years ago, taking roughly 15 
                        million years to complete. [Throughout this book I ask 
                        that you ignore these large time periods, and allow that 
                        current dating techniques might, for some reason, be 
                        fallible.] As slow as this 
                        sounds, normal continental drift cannot account for 
                        movement at such a speed. Dr. Joseph Kirschvink, a 
                        geologist and lead author of the study, speculates that 
                        it was due to: 
                          "true polar wander" which is caused 
                          by "an imbalance in the mass distribution of the 
                          planet itself, which the laws of physics force to 
                          equalise in comparatively rapid time scales. During 
                          this redistribution, the entire solid part of the 
                          planet moves together, avoiding the internal shearing 
                          effects which impose the speed limit on conventional 
                          plate motions."
                          
                          [12] The study 
                        speculates that changing weather patterns broke up 
                        ecosystems into smaller, isolated communities, thus 
                        promoting rapid evolution. The study also 
                        implies that poleshifts and evolution have occurred in 
                        unison, although a different reason for this will be 
                        explained in Chapter XX January 2000: 
                        Professor Sagar of Texas A&M University and Anthony 
                        Koppers of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography have, 
                        while studying underwater volcanoes, found evidence of 
                        poles shifting, albeit 84 million years ago. The shift 
                        consisted of "rapid latitude changes in various 
                        locales", with rapid meaning a relatively rapid 
                        period of two million years.   "We calculate that the sites of 
                        Washington D.C. and Dakar, Senegal would have shifted 
                        south by 15 to 20 degrees".  The article is 
                        highly technical but it appears they locate a previous 
                        pole at 58.9°N, 337.4°E[13] How long will it 
                        be before a poleshift of 10,000 years ago is validated 
                        by scientists? 
                          
                          
                          [9] Note: there have been numerous studies 
                          undertaken and as many show that the Antarctic ice cap 
                          is growing as those that show it to be melting. 
                          
                          
                          [11] Hapgood stated that as hard as it was to find 
                          evidence for the Hudson Bay location, the difficulties 
                          in locating the previous poles were much greater.
                          Earth's Shifting Crust, page 275 
                          
                          [11a] James Bowles, 
                          
                          The Gods, Gemini, and the Great Pyramid, 
                          Gemini Books, 1998, pages 33-34 
                          
                          
                          
                          [12] Science, 
                          July 25, 1997 - Evidence for a Large-Scale 
                          Reorganization of Early Cambrian Continental Masses by 
                          Inertial Interchange True Polar Wander by Joseph L. 
                          Kirschvink, Robert L. Ripperdan, and David A. Evans 
                          
                          
                          [13] Science, 
                          Jan 21, 2000, p455-459 FROM: 
      
      
      http://survive2012.com/index.php/hapgood-bowles.html   | 
    
      | 
                        
                          
                            
                              
                              
                              Newswise — Two University of 
                              Oregon researchers are on a multi-institutional 
                              26-member team proposing a startling new theory: 
                              that an extraterrestrial impact, possibly a comet, 
                              set off a 1,000-year-long cold spell and wiped out 
                              or fragmented the prehistoric Clovis culture and a 
                              variety of animal genera across North America 
                              almost 13,000 years ago. Driving the theory is a 
                              carbon-rich layer of soil that has been found, but 
                              not definitively explained, at some 50 Clovis-age 
                              sites in North America that date to the onset of a 
                              cooling period known as the Younger Dryas Event. 
                              The sites include several on the Channel Islands 
                              off California where UO archaeologists Douglas J. 
                              Kennett and Jon M. Erlandson have conducted 
                              research. The theory is being discussed 
                              publicly, for the first time, Wednesday, May 23, 
                              at the 2007 Joint Assembly of the American 
                              Geophysical Union in Acapulco, Mexico. Kennett is 
                              among the attendees who will be available to 
                              discuss the theory with their peers. The British 
                              journal Nature first addressed the theory in a 
                              news-section story in its May 18 issue. Before today, members of the 
                              team " including Kennett's father, James P. 
                              Kennett of the University of California, Santa 
                              Barbara, and Richard B. Firestone of Lawrence 
                              Berkeley National Laboratory " had been quietly 
                              introducing the theory to their professional 
                              colleagues. Douglas Kennett, with 
                              Erlandson watching, detailed the theory May 19 to 
                              a fully packed UO classroom, where students and 
                              faculty members from archaeology, art history, 
                              anthropology, biology, geology, geography, 
                              political science and psychology, pelted Kennett 
                              with questions. The researchers propose that 
                              a known reversal in the world's ocean currents and 
                              associated rapid global cooling, which some 
                              scientists blame for the extinction of multiple 
                              species of animals and the end of the Clovis 
                              Period, was itself the result of a bigger event. 
                              While generally accepted theory says glacial 
                              melting from the North American interior caused 
                              the shift in currents, the new proposal points to 
                              a large extraterrestrial object exploding above or 
                              even into the Laurentide Ice Sheet north of the 
                              Great Lakes. "Highest concentrations of 
                              extraterrestrial impact materials occur in the 
                              Great Lakes area and spread out from there," 
                              Kennett said. "It would have had major effects on 
                              humans. Immediate effects would have been in the 
                              North and East, producing shockwaves, heat, 
                              flooding, wildfires, and a reduction and 
                              fragmentation of the human population." 
                               The carbon-rich layer 
                              contains metallic microspherules, iridium, carbon 
                              spherules, fullerenes, charcoal and soot. Some of 
                              those ingredients were found worldwide in soils 
                              dating to the K-T Boundary of 65 million years 
                              ago. The K-T layer marks the end 
                              of the Cretaceous Period and the beginning of the 
                              Tertiary Period, when numerous species were wiped 
                              out after a massive asteroid is believed to have 
                              struck Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula and the Gulf of 
                              Mexico. Missing in the new theory is 
                              a crater marking an impact, but researchers argue 
                              that a strike above or into the Laurentide ice 
                              sheet could have absorbed it since it was less 
                              intense than the K-T event. Kennett said that 35 animal 
                              genera went extinct at the end of the Pleistocene, 
                              with at least 15 clearly being wiped out close to 
                              12,900 years ago. There would have been major 
                              ecological shifts, driving Clovis survivors into 
                              isolated groups in search of food and warmth. 
                              There is evidence, he said, that pockets of Clovis 
                              people survived in refugia, especially in the 
                              western United States. "This was a massive 
                              continental scale, if not global, event," Kennett 
                              said. He and Erlandson say that they are currently 
                              evaluating the existing Paleo-Indian 
                              archaeological datasets, which Kennett describes 
                              as "suggestive of significant population reduction 
                              and fragmentation, but additional work is 
                              necessary to test this hypothesis further." 
                              Earlier research efforts need to be re-evaluated 
                              using new technologies that can narrow radiocarbon 
                              date ranges, and, as funding becomes available, 
                              new sites can be located and studied, Erlandson 
                              said. "As we have grown more 
                              confident in the theory," Erlandson said, "we've 
                              been letting some of it out in informal talks to 
                              gage the response to see where we are headed and 
                              what the initial objections are, which will help 
                              us to maintain our own objectivity." 
                               The interest in pursuing both 
                              old and new leads could ignite a major surge of 
                              interdisciplinary questioning and attract a new 
                              wave of interested students, Kennett and Erlandson 
                              said. Links: Kennett faculty Web 
                              page:
                              
                              http://www.uoregon.edu/~dkennett/Welcome.html;
                              Erlandson faculty Web page: 
                              
                              
                              http://www.uoregon.edu/~dkennett/Welcome.html
 Two University of Oregon 
                              researchers are on a multi-institutional 26-member 
                              team proposing a startling new theory: that an 
                              extraterrestrial impact, possibly a comet, set off 
                              a 1,000-year-long cold spell and wiped out or 
                              fragmented the prehistoric Clovis culture and a 
                              variety of animal genera across North America 
                              almost 13,000 years ago.   | 
    
      | Pole shift 
            hypothesis
               
                This article is about the hypothesis of pole 
                shift in its historical context. For a description of the modern 
                scientific understanding, see
                
                true polar wander. The pole shift hypothesis is the
              
              hypothesis that the
              
              axis of rotation of a planet has not always been at its 
              present-day locations or that the axis will not persist there; in 
              other words, that its physical poles had been or will be shifted 
              with respect to the underlying surface. The Pole shift hypothesis 
              is almost always discussed in the context of
              Earth, 
              but other bodies in the
              
              Solar System may have experienced axial reorientation during 
              their existences. The pole shift hypothesis has attracted
              
              pseudoscientific interest because of the idea that a sudden 
              change in the position of the poles could explain some past 
              historical calamities, such as massive floods and tectonic events.[1] 
              Among the scientific community, however, the evidence shows that 
              no rapid shifts in the pole have occurred during the last 200 
              million years.[2]
              
              True polar wander is known to occur, but only at rates of 1° 
              per million years or less.[3] 
              The last rapid shift in the poles may have occurred 800 million 
              years ago,[4] 
              when the
              
              supercontinent
              
              Rodinia still existed. 
              Definition and clarificationThe
              
              geographic poles of the Earth refer to the points on the 
              surface of the planet that are intersected by the axis of 
              rotation. The pole shift hypothesis refers to a change in location 
              of these poles with respect to the underlying surface. Note that 
              this is a different phenomenon than the changes in axial 
              orientation with respect to the
              
              plane of the ecliptic that are caused by
              
              precession and
              
              nutation. Pole shift hypotheses are not to be confused 
              with
              
              plate tectonics, the well-accepted geological theory that the 
              Earth's surface consists of solid plates which shift over a fluid
              
              asthenosphere; nor with
              
              continental drift, the corollary to plate tectonics which 
              maintains that locations of the continents have moved slowly over 
              the face of the Earth,[5] 
              resulting in the gradual emerging and breakup of continents and 
              oceans over hundreds of millions of years.[6] Pole shift hypotheses are also not to be 
              confused with
              
              geomagnetic reversal, the periodic reversal of the Earth's 
              magnetic field (effectively switching the north and south magnetic 
              poles). Geomagnetic reversal has more acceptance in the scientific 
              community than pole shift hypotheses. 
              Causes and effectsIt is now established that
              
              true polar wander has occurred at various times in the past, 
              but at rates of 1° per million years or less.[3][7][8] 
              However, in popular literature, many conjectures have been 
              suggested involving very rapid polar shift. The potential forces 
              that could cause a reorientation of the Earth's axis of rotation 
              include: 
                A postglacial crustal rebound.[9]
                A high-velocity
                
                asteroid or
                comet 
                which hits Earth at such an angle that the
                
                lithosphere moves independent of the
                
                mantle.A high-velocity asteroid or comet which 
                hits Earth at such an angle that the entire planet shifts axis.An unusually magnetic
                
                celestial object which passes close enough to Earth to 
                temporarily reorient the
                
                magnetic field, which then "drags" the
                
                lithosphere about a new axis of rotation. Eventually, the 
                sun's magnetic field again determines the Earth's, after the 
                intruding celestial object "returns" to a location from which it 
                cannot influence Earth.Perturbations of the topography of the 
                core-mantle boundary, perhaps induced by differential core 
                rotation and shift of its axial rotation vector, leading to CMB 
                mass redistributions. See, e.g., Bowin.[10]
                Mass redistributions in the mantle from 
                mantle avalanches or other deformations. See, e.g., Ladbury,[11] 
                and Steinberger and O'Connell.[12]
                 A slow pole shift in the poles would display 
              the most minor alterations and no destruction. A more dramatic 
              view assumes more rapid changes, with dramatic alterations of 
              geography and localized areas of destruction due to earthquakes 
              and tsunamis. Several recent books propose changes that take place 
              in weeks, days, or even hours, resulting in a variety of doomsday 
              scenarios. 
              Early proponentsAn early mention of a shifting of the Earth's 
              axis can be found in an 1872 article entitled "Chronologie 
              historique des Mexicains"[13] 
              by
              
              Charles Étienne Brasseur de Bourbourg, an eccentric expert on
              
              Mesoamerican codices who interpreted ancient Mexican myths as 
              evidence for four periods of global cataclysms that had begun 
              around 10,500 B.C. In 1948,
              
              Hugh Auchincloss Brown, an electrical engineer, advanced a 
              hypothesis of catastrophic pole shift. Brown also argued that 
              accumulation of ice at the poles caused recurring tipping of the 
              axis, identifying cycles of approximately seven millennia.[14][15] 
              
              Charles Hapgood is now 
              perhaps the best remembered early proponent. In his books The 
              Earth's Shifting Crust (1958) (which includes a foreword by
              
              Albert Einstein who was writing before the theory of plate 
              tectonics was developed) and Path of the Pole (1970). Hapgood, 
              building on Adhemar's much earlier model, speculated that the ice 
              mass at one or both poles over-accumulates and destabilizes the 
              Earth's rotational balance, causing slippage of all or much of 
              Earth's outer crust around the Earth's core, which retains its 
              axial orientation. Based on his own research, Hapgood argued 
              that each shift took approximately 5,000 years, followed by 
              20,000- to 30,000-year periods with no polar movements. Also, in 
              his calculations, the area of movement never covered more than 40 
              degrees. Hapgood's examples of recent locations for the North Pole 
              include
              
              Hudson Bay (60˚N, 73˚W) , the Atlantic Ocean between
              
              Iceland and
              
              Norway (72˚N, 10˚E) and
              Yukon 
              (63˚N, 135˚W).[16] However, in his subsequent work The Path of 
              the Pole, Hapgood conceded Einstein's point that the weight of the 
              polar ice would be insufficient to bring about a polar shift. 
              Instead, Hapgood argued that the forces that caused the shifts in 
              the crust must be located below the surface. He had no 
              satisfactory explanation for how this could occur.[17] Hapgood wrote to the Canadian librarian,
              
              Rand Flem-Ath, encouraging him in his pursuit of scientific 
              evidence to back Hapgood's claims and in his expansion of the 
              hypothesis. Flem-Ath published the results of this work in 1995 in 
              When the Sky Fell co-written with his wife, Rose. 
              Recent researchStarting with research published in 1981 by 
              Donna Jurdy, titled True Polar Wander,[18] 
              interest in the hypothesis and its mechanisms has increased. In 
              2001, the true polar hypothesis was tested by examining 
              paleomagnetic data from granitic rocks from across North America. 
              The data from these rocks conflicted with the hypothesis. This 
              evidence indicated that the spin axis has not deviated by more 
              than about 5° over the last 130 million years.[19] In 2006, the early work by Donna Jurdy was 
              validated with empirical evidence of polar wanderings published by
              
              Adam Maloof of
              
              Princeton University and
              
              Galen Halverson of
              
              Paul Sabatier University in
              
              Toulouse, France. They found evidence that the Earth 
              rebalanced around 800 million years ago during the
              
              Precambrian time period. 
                "They tested this idea by studying 
                magnetic minerals in sedimentary rocks in a Norwegian 
                archipelago. As the mineral grains were deposited or excreted by 
                microbes, they aligned themselves with Earth's magnetic field. 
                So they act as frozen compasses pointing to an ancient north 
                pole.  
                Using these minerals, Maloof and Halverson 
                found that the north pole shifted more than 50 degrees--about 
                the current distance between Alaska and the equator--in less 
                than 20 million years. Earth's tectonic plates move much more 
                slowly than that, says Maloof, so the best explanation for this 
                wandering pole is planetary rebalancing. This reasoning is 
                supported by a record of changes in sea level and ocean 
                chemistry in the Norwegian sediments that could be explained by 
                true polar wander, the team reports in the September-October 
                2006 issue of the Geological Society of America Bulletin."[4][20]
                 Subsequent research at the University of 
              Colorado Department of Physics published in 2007 has elaborated 
              the model of the effect thermal convection has on true polar 
              wandering. This work predicts the occurrence of polar wandering 
              prior to, during and after the breakup of
              
              Pangaea.[21] A Harvard University Department of Earth and 
              Planetary Sciences research project published in 2007 found 
              through modeling that the amount of polar wander on a short time 
              scale is less than would be expected by plate tectonics, but more 
              than would be expected on a long time scale. Empirical evidence of 
              the maximum wander predicted by the model have not been observed 
              by the authors.[22] 
              PseudoscienceThe field has attracted
              
              pseudoscientific authors offering a variety of evidence, 
              including psychic readings, possibly linked to other beliefs such 
              as
              
              Tollmann's hypothetical bolide,
              
              Black Sea deluge theory or the
              
              Deluge myth. In the 1970s and 1980s a series of 
              non-fiction books authored by former Washington Newspaper reporter 
              Ruth Shick Montgomery elaborates on Edgar Cayce readings.[23] In 1997,
              
              Richard W. Noone published the novel 5/5/2000, ICE: The 
              Ultimate Disaster which depicts a cataclysmic shift of the Earth's
              ice 
              cap covering
              
              Antarctica caused by a
              
              planetary alignment and
              
              solar storms, leading to crustal displacement. This book falls 
              under pseudoscience rather than pop culture because Noone used 
              scientific reasoning and backing to support his claim that the 
              Earth's crust would "turn on its side" on 5 May 2000.[24] 
              This did not happen. In 1998, retired civil engineer
              
              James G. Bowles proposed in a non-peer reviewed journal a 
              mechanism by which a polar shift could occur. He named this 
              Rotational-Bending, or the RB-effect. He hypothesized that 
              combined gravitational effects of the Sun and the Moon pulled at 
              the Earth's crust at an oblique angle. This force steadily wore 
              away at the underpinnings that linked the crust to the inner 
              mantle. This generates a plastic zone that allows the crust to 
              rotate with respect to the lower layers. Centrifugal forces acting 
              on the mass of ice at the poles, causing them to move to the 
              equator.[25] Books on this subject have been published by
              
              William Hutton including the 1996 book Coming Earth Changes: 
              Causes and Consequences of the Approaching Pole Shift (ISBN 
              0876043619), which compared geologic records with the psychic 
              readings of
              
              Edgar Cayce and predicted catastrophic
              
              climate changes before the end of 2001. In 2004 Hutton and 
              co-author Jonathan Eagle published Earth's Catastrophic Past and 
              Future: A Scientific Analysis of Information Channeled by Edgar 
              Cayce (ISBN 
              1-58112-517-8), which summarizes possible mechanisms and the 
              timing of a future pole shift. In 
              mediaThe movie
              
              2012 depicts pole shift hypothesis as one of the
              
              doomsday scenarios in the film[26]. See 
              alsoNotes
                
                  ^
                  Kiger, Patrick J..
                  
                  Ends of the Earth: Shifting of the Poles. National 
                  Geographic.
                  
                  http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/ends-of-the-earth-pole-shift-2. 
                  Retrieved 2009-11-22. 
                  ^
                  Besse, Jean; Courtillot, 
                  Vincent. "Apparent and true polar wander and the geometry of 
                  the geomagnetic field over the last 200 Myr". Journal of 
                  Geophysical Research (Solid Earth) 107 (B11): EPM 6-1 to EPM 
                  6-31.
                  
                  doi:10.1029/2000JB000050. 
                  ^ 
                  a 
                  b 
                  Andrews, J. A. (August 10, 
                  1985).
                  
                  True polar wander - An analysis of cenozoic and mesozoic 
                  paleomagnetic poles. 90. pp. 7737–7750.
                  
                  doi:10.1029/JB090iB09p07737.
                  
                  http://adsabs.harvard.edu//abs/1985JGR....90.7737A. 
                  Retrieved 2009-11-08. 
                  ^ 
                  a 
                  b 
                  Maloof, Adam C.; et al.. "Combined 
                  paleomagnetic, isotopic, and stratigraphic evidence for true 
                  polar wander from the Neoproterozoic Akademikerbreen Group, 
                  Svalbard, Norway". Geological Society of America Bulletin 
                  118 (9): 1099–1124.
                  
                  doi:10.1130/B25892.1.
                  
                  http://gsabulletin.gsapubs.org/content/118/9-10/1099.abstract. 
                  ^
                  
                  The PaleoMap Project ^
                  
                  Science Magazine, “Late Cretaceous True Polar Wander: Not So 
                  Fast” ^
                  Hoffman, P. (1999). "The 
                  break-up of Rodinia, birth of Gondwana, true polar wander and 
                  the snowball Earth". Journal of African Earth Sciences 28 
                  (1): 17–33.
                  
                  doi:10.1016/S0899-5362(99)00018-4.
                  
                  http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999JAfES..28...17H. 
                  Retrieved 2009-11-08. 
                  ^
                  Besse, Jean; Courtillot, 
                  Vincent (November 2002). "Apparent 
                  and true polar wander and the geometry of the geomagnetic 
                  field over the last 200 Myr". Journal of Geophysical 
                  Research (Solid Earth) 107 (B11): EPM 6-1.
                  
                  doi:10.1029/2000JB000050.
                  
                  http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002JGRB..107.2300B. 
                  Retrieved 2009-11-08. 
                  ^
                  Vermeersen, L. L. A.; 
                  Fournier, A.; Sabadini, R.. "Changes in rotation induced by 
                  Pleistocene ice masses with stratified analytical Earth 
                  models". Journal of Geophysical Research 102 (B12): 
                  27689–27702.
                  
                  doi:10.1029/97JB01738.
                  
                  Bibcode: 1997JGR...10227689V. 
                  ^ 
                  Carl Bowin, "Mass anomaly structure of the Earth," Reviews of 
                  Geophysics 38(3; August 2000):355-387. 
                  ^ R. Ladbury, "Model 
                  suggests deep-mantle topography goes with the flow", Physics 
                  Today, August 1999, 21-24. 
                  ^ B. Steinberger and 
                  R. J. O'Connell, "Changes of the Earth's rotation axis owing 
                  to advection of mantle density heterogeneities", Nature 387(8 
                  May 1997):169. 
                  ^ 
                  "Chronologie 
                  historique des Mexicains" (in French), L'ethnographie 
                  (Paris, France: Société d'Ethnographie) 7: 77–85, 1871,
                  
                  http://books.google.com/books?id=BvwpAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA77#v=onepage&q=&f=false, 
                  retrieved 2009-11-08 
                  
                  ^
                  Brown, Hugh Auchincloss (1967). 
                  Cataclysms of the Earth. Twayne Publishers. 
                  
                  ^
                  "Science: 
                  Can the Earth Capsize?". Time. September 13, 1948.
                  
                  http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,888482,00.html. 
                  Retrieved 2009-11-08. 
                  
                  ^
                  
                  Theory of Crustal Displacement — summarized by Ellie Crystal
                  
                  ^
                  Perilous planet earth: 
                  catastrophes and catastrophism through the ages. Cambridge 
                  University Press. 2003. pp. 113–114.
                  
                  ISBN
                  
                  0521819288. 
                  
                  ^ 
                  Jurdy, Donna M.. "True 
                  polar wander". Tectonophysics 74 (1-2).
                  
                  doi:10.1016/0040-1951(81)90124-4..
                  
                  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V72-48B5CJV-20/2/fceafe7c2b9eab38d796c22ab1a6f6e5. 
                  
                  ^ 
                  Tarduno, John A.; Smirnova, 
                  Alexei V. (January 15, 2001). "Stability of the Earth with 
                  respect to the spin axis for the last 130 million years". 
                  Earth and Planetary Science Letters 184 (2): 549–553.
                  
                  doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00348-4. 
                  
                  ^
                  Mason, Betsy (August 2006). "Earth's 
                  Poles May Have Wandered". Science NOW Daily News.
                  
                  http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2006/830/2. 
                  
                  ^ 
                  Zhong, Shijie; et al.. "Supercontinent 
                  cycles, true polar wander, and very long-wavelength mantle 
                  convection". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 261 
                  (3-4): 551-564.
                  
                  doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.049..
                  
                  http://www.es.ucsc.edu/~jhr/research/Zhong_etal_EPSL2007.pdf. 
                  
                  ^ 
                  Tsai, Victor; et al.. "Theoretical 
                  constraints on true polar wander". JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL 
                  RESEARCH 112.
                  
                  doi:10.1029/2005JB003923.
                  
                  http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~vtsai/files/TsaiStevenson_JGR2007.pdf. 
                  
                  ^ "Threshold to 
                  Tomorrow", (1984)
                  
                  ISBN 9780449201824
                  
                  ISBN 0449201821; "Strangers Among Us", (1979); "Aliens 
                  Among Us", (1985) and "The World to Come: The Guides' 
                  Long-Awaited Predictions for the Dawning Age", (1999). 
                  
                  ^
                  Noone, Richard W. (May 20, 1997). 
                  5/5/2000, ICE: The Ultimate Disaster. New York, NY: Three 
                  Rivers Press.
                  
                  ISBN
                  
                  0-60980-067-1.  
                  Preface, Table of Contents, Appendices. 
                  ^
                  Bowles, James (1999). "Hapgood 
                  Revisited". Atlantis Rising (18).
                  
                  http://www.atlantisrising.com/backissues/issue18/18hapgood.html. 
                  Retrieved 2009-11-09. 
                  
                  ^
                  
                  http://www.instituteforhumancontinuity.org/ 
                   
              External links | 
    
      | COMET DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
      
      ASTEROID DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
      EARTHQUAKE DATABASE ON THIS SITE 
      NIBIRU TRUTH 
      POLESHIFT 
      DATABASE ON THIS SITE DREAMS OF THE GREAT EARTHCHANGES - MAIN INDEX   |